coffee cropmonitoring draft

30
Coffee-crop monitoring using sensor networks in Karnataka Rahul Bhargava, [email protected] 10th June 2014 Monitoring for precision agriculture involves the procurement and maintenance of sensing hardware, and software and processes for re- cording, collating and analysing data. A partnership for interpretation of data is anticipated and may result following consultations with plantation personnel and extension experts. Following settling on the hardware, support software and systems can be put together and this proposed sequence of decision mak- ing motivates the presentation of curated options below, hardware followed by software, to present possibilities before entering into consultations with experts. Contents Coffee crop monitoring 2 Agronomy and plant physiology 2 Harvesting and post-harvest .................... 2 Weed management ......................... 3 Pathology .............................. 3 Nutrients ............................... 4 Motivation for monitoring ..................... 4 BBCH-scale 6 Aerial vehicles for collecting data 11 Research platforms and capabilities ............... 11 Tea crop monitoring by Tea Board & National Remote Sensing Centre 13 Objectives .............................. 14 Outputs ................................ 14 Outcomes ............................... 15 Precipitation in Karnataka districts of interest 15 Chikmagalur ............................. 15 Kodagu ................................ 18 Hassan ................................ 19 Evapotranspiration 20 Leaf Area Index 20

Upload: rahul-bhargava

Post on 17-May-2015

318 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Coffee-crop monitoring using sensor networks inKarnatakaRahul Bhargava, [email protected] June 2014

Monitoring for precision agriculture involves the procurement andmaintenance of sensing hardware, and software and processes for re-cording, collating and analysing data. A partnership for interpretationof data is anticipated and may result following consultations withplantation personnel and extension experts.

Following settling on the hardware, support software and systemscan be put together and this proposed sequence of decision mak-ing motivates the presentation of curated options below, hardwarefollowed by software, to present possibilities before entering intoconsultations with experts.

Contents

Coffee crop monitoring 2

Agronomy and plant physiology 2

Harvesting and post-harvest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Weed management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Nutrients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Motivation for monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

BBCH-scale 6

Aerial vehicles for collecting data 11

Research platforms and capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Tea crop monitoring by Tea Board & National Remote Sensing Centre 13

Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Outputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Precipitation in Karnataka districts of interest 15

Chikmagalur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Kodagu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Hassan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Evapotranspiration 20

Leaf Area Index 20

Page 2: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Coffee crop monitoring

Coffee is one of the most valuable primary commodities worldwide.Traditionally, the crop has been cultivated on small (<50 ha) farmswhere repeated hand picking is the standard harvesting procedure.1 1 Herwitz et al. Imaging from an

unmanned aerial vehicle: agriculturalsurveillance and decision support.doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.02.006

The major coffee growing regions in India are the districts ofChikmagalur, Coorg, and Hassan in Karnataka, Wynad, Idduki andNelliampathys in Kerala and Pulneys, Shevroys, Anamalais andNilgiris in Tamil Nadu.2 2 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_

upload/agns/pdf/coffee/Annex-E.2.

pdf

Agronomy and plant physiology

Covers soil, land, water, shade and weed management for increasingthe productivity of various coffee varieties under different agro-climatic conditions.

• Soil management for soil and water conservation, including microirrigation3. 3 http://www.chickmagalur.nic.in/

htmls/ccri_agronomy.htm. Drip irriga-tion was found to be beneficial in theCauvery by Chickmagalur ResearchStation. Four litres of water per day foraround a hundred days during the dryperiod from November to May resultedin yield increases of up to 24 percentwith a cost benefit ratio of [1:5]. How-ever, high initial investment, regularmaintenance etc. makes it unsuitablefor large areas.

• Improving fertilizer use efficiency through fertigation.

• Weather models for predicting pest and disease outbreaks.

• Enhancing yield by stimulating flower induction4. Plant growth

4 Mepiquat Chloride at 1000 ppmtwice between August and Septemberenhances the yield of arabica coffee

regulators increase crop yield with a cost benefit ratio of 1:45.

5 Planofix ( 0.025%) Harmonal (0.025% )

• Identification of highly physiologically efficient cultivars.

• Hormonal manipulation to increase the crop production andcurtailing biennial bearing in coffee.

Harvesting and post-harvest

Coffee blossoms do not appear and develop uniformly throughout aplantation. The resulting fruit thus tends to ripen at different times,with spatial and temporal trends that are difficult to track and predict(Wormer, 1964

6; Cannell, 19757) 6 Wormer, T.M., 1964. The growth of

the coffee cherry. Annals of Botany 27,47–55. Quoted below7 Cannell, M.G.R., 1975. Crop physiolo-gical aspects of coffee bean yields: areview. Journal of Coffee Research 5,7–20. Summarises existing informationon coffee crop physiology emphas-ising whole-plant physiology andcharacteristics influencing yield.

In Kenya the coffee berry stays in the ‘pin-head’ stage for approxim-ately 6–8 weeks after flowering. A period of rapid growth followswhich ends when the berry is about 17 weeks old. Thereafter, a smallloss of fresh weight seems to occur while the dry weight remains con-stant for about two weeks. At this stage the beans have attained their fi-nal size but dry matter can be as low as 9 per cent. Until the time whenripening begins, the fresh weight of the berry increases little while thedry weight increases regularly. In this period dry weight is laid downmainly in the beans which attain their final dry weight when the berryis still green. During ripening of the berry (which is in fact ripeningof the pulp) the fresh weight of the beans drops slightly due to lossof water. Both fresh weight and dry weight of the pulp (includingparchment) increase considerably during ripening by approximately

2

Page 3: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

121 per cent. and 106 per cent. respectively. Annals of Botany (1964) 28

(1): 47-55 http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/1.toc

Due to variations on individual trees as well as in differentsections of a field, mechanical harvesting yields a mixture of un-ripe, ripe, and overripe fruit in varying proportions (Reddy andSrinivasan, 1979

8; Cannell, 1985). Ripe fruit has the highest value, fol- 8 Reddy, G.S.T., Srinivasan, C.S., 1979.Variability for flower production, fruitset and fruit drop in some varietiesof Coffea arabica L. Journal of CoffeeResearch 9, 27–34.

lowed by overripe and then unripe. To maximize value, crop ripenessstage is a main consideration of harvest managers (Watson, 1980

9;

9 Watson, A.G., 1980. The mechanisationof coffee production. In: Proceedings ofthe Ninth International Coffee ResearchConference, London, pp. 681–686.

Willson, 199910). Managers typically rely on repeated manual cherry

10 Willson, K.C., 1999. Coffee, Cocoaand Tea. Crop Production Sciencein Horticulture Series No. 8, CABIPublishing, Oxford, UK.

counts made by field scouts and taken on a few sample brancheswithin each field. Without removing the fruit, the scouts visually sortcherries on each branch by ripeness category to estimate field-levelpercentages.

• Post harvest practices, development and evaluation of machineryand production of value added products from coffee waste.

• Pesticide, residues, and microbial / mycotoxin contamination incoffee.

• Water pollution emanating from wet processing of coffee.

Weed management

Another important and costly aspect of coffee production and harvestis weed proliferation. Weed eradication, which is required to main-tain crop yield, poses significant production and environmental costs.With crop heights generally exceeding 2m and between-rowalleysgenerally difficult to negotiate, field interiors are not readily viewedor mapped from the ground. Large weeds in the form of grassesand vines can significantly slow the harvesting process, and thusadversely affect the overall schedule.

Pathology

Coffee is a perennial crop that remains in the field for many years.This allows some insects to maintain an uninterrupted succession ofgenerations without leaving the plant, unlike those on annual cropswhere the pest must move elsewhere after the plant dies. Othersmay be permanently associated with coffee and have a narrow hostrange, but their populations increase to damaging levels undercertain favourable conditions, e.g. antestia and the Lyonetiid moths(Leucoptera spp.). Those that feed upon the berries, such as theberry borer (Hypothenemus hampei), may be more easily controlledin areas with a defined flowering period rather than in those that

3

Page 4: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

experience intermittent rainfall throughout the year, with continuousavailability of berries. Insect pests rarely kill the tree, but thosethat do, such as stem borers, may have a permanent effect on theplantation, as it can be difficult to re-establish bearing trees in thegap left by a dead tree. Leaf retention is essential for maximizationof coffee yields, and lowlevel but continuous loss of leaves due toleaf-feeding insect pests and Homoptera – which literally drain theplant of nutrients – can contribute to physiological dieback if they arenot controlled.11 11 Waller, J. M.; Bigger, M.; Hillocks,

R. J.. Coffee Pests, Diseases and TheirManagement. Wallingford, Oxon, GBR:CABI Publishing, 2007. p 36.

Chikmagalur has a Plant Pathology Division at the Central CoffeeResearch Institute, Coffee Research Station, that concentrates onmanagement of diseases through cultural, chemical and biologicalmethods12. Periodic surveys of plantations are undertaken, for 12 http://www.chickmagalur.nic.in/

htmls/ccri_plant_path.htmadvisories on possible disease outbreaks, prior to making diseasecontrol recommendations, and training growers, plantation managersand extension personnel.

Current programs address integrated disease management ofcoffee leaf rust disease13, updating disease control recommendations 13 Plantvax 20 EC and Bayleton 25 EC

are being recommended against leafrust disease. An alkaline Bordeaux mix-ture for spraying is being recommendedfor prevention

and developing a spray schedule against coffee diseases.

Nutrients

Water and nutrient availability are key production factors for coffee,as for most other crops. Fertilizer is required to replace substantialquantities of nutrients lost to harvest.

Motivation for monitoring

“India cultivates all of its coffee under a well-defined two-tier mixedshade canopy, comprising evergreen leguminous trees. Nearly 50

different types of shade trees are found in coffee plantations. Shadetrees prevent soil erosion on a sloping terrain; they enrich the soil byrecycling nutrients from deeper layers, protect the coffee plant fromseasonal fluctuations in temperature, and play host to diverse floraand fauna.14 14 http://www.indiacoffee.org/

coffee-regions-india.html“Coffee plantations in India are essential spice worlds too: a widevariety of spices and fruit crops like pepper, cardamom, vanilla,orange and banana grow alongside coffee plants.”

1. Integrated pest management is preferred, using techniques suchas targeted treatment of pest outbreaks, and managing crop en-vironment away from conditions favouring pests, to spraying ofinsecticides which has often proven to be counter-productive,as the predators of the pests are more sensitive than the peststhemselves.

4

Page 5: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Factors Arabica Robusta

Soils Deep, fertile, rich inorganic matter, welldrained and slightlyacidic (pH 6.0–6.5)

Same as Arabica

Slopes Gentle to moderateslopes

Gentle slopes to fairlylevel fields

Elevation 1000–1500m 500–1000mAspect North, East and North–

East aspectsSame as Arabica

Temperature 15◦C–25

◦ C ; cool,equable

20◦C–30

◦ C; hot, humid

Relativehumidity

70–80% 80–90%

Annualrainfall

1600–2500 mm 1000–2000 mm

Blossomshowers

March– April (25–40mm) February –March (25–40

mm)Backingshowers

April–May (50–75 mm)well distributed

March–April (50–75 mm)well distributed

Table 1: Growing conditions

2. Growing coffee is water intensive. Terrain maps may assist withplanning surface runoff. For successful production, a free drainingsoil with a minimum depth of 3 feet (1 m) is required. Coffee willnot tolerate water-logging or ‘wet feet’.15 15 http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/

ae938e/ae938e03.htm3. Testing pH is particularly important for coffee. A pH of 5 or 6

is ideal, lower pH affects yield. Dolomite, Calcium MagnesiumCarbonate, is added as a pH buffer and as a magnesium source.As is lime, Calcium Oxide or Calcium hydroxide, to the soil.16 16 Ibid.

4. Arabica is the more sensitive species to invertebrate predationoverall. For reference, ideal conditions are highlighted for Arabica,from the literature. Arabica coffee prefers a cool temperaturewith an optimum daily temperature of 68

◦ to 75◦F (20

◦ to 24◦C).

Temperatures greater than 86◦F (30

◦C) cause plant stress leadingto a cessation of photosynthesis. Mean temperatures of less than59

◦F (15◦C), limit plant growth and are considered suboptimal. As

Arabica coffee is susceptible to frost damage, use of shade treeswill reduce the incidence.

5. Ideal rainfall for Arabica coffee is greater than 47 to 60 inches(1200 to 1500 mm) per year

6. An easterly or southern facing aspect with a slope less than 15%

5

Page 6: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

is preferable. Steeper slopes present a major erosion risk and re-quire terracing or special management such as contour furrows orpreferably grass strips. A slight slope will improve air drainageand reduce damage from frost. Do not plant coffee at the bottomof a slope or in shallow dips where cold air can pool, as frost dam-age is more likely here. Usually it is best not to plant the bottomthird of a slope as it will be colder and sometimes waterlogged.

7. Coffee requires adequate water during the growing and croppingperiod, however it also requires a dry stress period followed bysufficient rain or irrigation to promote uniform flowering anda good fruit set. Many plantings suffer from moisture stress atthe time of year when they need adequate water for growth andcropping. Unless regular rain is received, young newly plantedtrees should be irrigated (or hand watered at least twice a weekif irrigation is not available) to ensure establishment. Locatingcoffee plantings near a water supply for possible irrigation as wellas for processing of cherry is desirable. Water requirements canbe reduced by use of suitable, well-established shade trees andmulch.

BBCH-scale

Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt und CHemische Indus-trie17. The BBCH scale is a system for a uniform coding of phenolo- 17 Federal Biological Research Centre,

Federal Office of Plant Varieties andCHemical industry

gically similar growth stages of all mono- and dicotyledonous plantspecies.

Phenological development stages of plants to play importantrole in agricultural planning research (eg phytopathology and plantbreeding), so but in applied botanical sciences.

They are used in the agricultural industry (eg agricultural met-eorology, timing of fertilization or pesticide application, agriculturalinsurance)18. 18 http://www.jki.bund.de/en/

startseite/veroeffentlichungen/

bbch-codes.html

6

Page 7: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

00 05

09 1020

19/33

21/90 23/93 25/94 29/97

DryCseed

SeedCradicalprotrusionandChooking

EmergenceCotyledonsunfolded

FirstCpairCofCprimaryCbranchesCvisible

9CorCmoreCleafCpairsunfolded/Branchelongation,C30CnodespresentCinCbranches

Page 8: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

51

59

71

79

77

60

57Inflorescenceybudsyswellingyinyleafyaxils Closedyflowersyvisible

Elongatedyclosedypetals Firstyfloweryopen

Berryygrowthybeginning Fruitsyareydarkygreen

Fruitymature

Page 9: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Growth stage Code Description

0: Germination,vegetative propagation

0 Dry seed (11-12% moisture content), beige color if parch-ment present or bluish-green if parchment and silver skinremoved. Cutting (orthotropic, mononodal, 60 mm long, twohalf trimmed leaves). Stump with bulky nodes and no budsvisible

1 Beginning of seed imbibition, bean swollen, whitish, no radiclevisible. Cutting planted in rooting media, no shoots visible, nocallus visible

2 Seed imbibition complete, bean whitish, small swelling vis-ible at one end of bean where the embryo is located. Callusformation begins on cuttings. Bud burst start on stumps

5 Seed radicle protrusion and hooking. Shoot and root formationon the cuttings. Green, rounded buds visible on the stumps

6 Elongation of radicle, formation of root hairs and lateral rootson seeds and cuttings.

7 Hypocotyl with cotyledons breaking through the seed coat.Cuttings have formed shoots and branched roots.

9 Emergence: Seeds have emerged from soil and show the hy-pocotile with cotyledons still enclosed in the parchment. Thecuttings present roots 6-7 cm. long and shoots with 1-2 nodes.Stumps show sprouts with first leaf initials.

1: Leaf development onmain shoot of the youngplant, and branches ofthe coffee tree

10 Cotyledons completely unfolded. First pair of true leaves separ-ating on shoot or first pair of true leaves separating on branchof the coffee tree

11 first leaf pair unfolded, not yet at full size. Leaves are lightgreen or bronze

12 2 leaf pairs unfolded, not yet at full size. Leaves are light greenor bronze

13 3 leaf pairs unfolded, not yet full size. The third leaf pair fromapex is dark green

14 4 leaf pairs unfolded. The fourth leaf pair from apex is darkgreen and has reached full size

1{5–8} Stages continues till...19 9 or more leaf pairs unfolded

2: Formation of branches(only for plants in thefield)

20 First pair of primary branches are visible21 10 pair of primary branches visible22 20 pair of primary branches visible23 30 pair of primary branches visible2{4–8} Stages continues till...29 90 or more pairs of primary branches visible

3: Branch elongation

31 10 nodes present in the branch(es)

9

Page 10: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Table 3 – continued

Growth stage Code Description

32 20 nodes present in the branch(es)3{3–8} Stages continues till...39 90 or more nodes present in the branch(es)

5: Inflorescenceemergence

51 Inflorescence buds swelling in leaf axils53 Inflorescence buds burst and covered by brown mucilage; no

flowers visible57 Flowers visible, still closed and tightly join, borne on multi-

flowered inflorescence (3-4 flowers per inflorescence)58 Flowers visible, untight, still closed, petals 4-6 mm long and

green (dormant stage)59 Flowers with petals elongated ( 6-10 mm long), still closed and

white color.

6: Flowering

60 First flowers open61 10% of flowers open63 30% of flowers open65 50% of flowers open67 70% of flowers open69 90% of flowers open

7: Development of fruit

70 Fruits visible as small yellowish berries71 Fruit set: Beginning of berry growth. Fruits have reached 10%

of final size (pinheads).73 Fruits are light green and contents are liquid and crystalline.

Fruits have reached 30% of final size (fast growth).75 Fruits are light green and its contents are liquid and crystalline.

Fruits have reached 50% of final size.77 Fruits are dark green and its contents are solid and white.

Fruits have reached 70% of final size.79 Fruits are pale green and its contents are solid and white.

Physiological maturity is complete. Fruits have reached 90% offinal size.

8: Ripening of fruit andseed

81 Beginning of change of fruit coloration from pale green toyellow or red

85 Increase in intensity (variety-specific), yellow or red, fruit color;fruit not yet ready for picking.

88 Fruit is fully ripe color and ready for picking.89 Overripe; beginning of darkening or drying; fruits stay on the

tree or abscission begins.

10

Page 11: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Table 3 – continued

Growth stage Code Description

9: Senescence

90 Shoots have completed their development; the plant appearsof an intense dark green color, leaves are of normal size andharvest locates at the bottom part of the plant.

93 Older leaves change its color from deep green to yellow withred spots, and fall specially at harvesting time.

94 The foliage changes to a pale green color. Defoliation isobserved on the bottom part of the main stem and lowerbranches.

97 The production zone has moved towards the upper parts in themain shoot and outer parts of branches, leaves are of smallersize than normal, strong defoliation is observed on the bottomand inner part of the plant, some dead branches are observedat the bottom.

98 The production zone is limited to a very few branches onthe top of the shoot and a very few nodes on the tip of thesebranches, and the plant is heavily defoliated. A high-degreeof senescence has been reached. 90% or more of the harvestcompleted.

99 Post harvest or storage treatments

Table 3: BBCH-scale, coffee. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBCH-scale_%28coffee%29, J Arcila-Pulgarínet al.(2002), Application of the extended BBCH scale for the description of the growth stages of coffee(Coffea spp.). Annals of Applied Biology, 141: 19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00191.x

Aerial vehicles for collecting data

Research platforms and capabilities

1. Paparazzi UAV Project19. Autopilot system. Small Unmanned Ob- 19 http://wiki.paparazziuav.org/

wiki/Main_Pageserver (SUMO)20 uses industry standard sensors for temperature,20 http://wiki.paparazziuav.org/

wiki/SUMOair pressure, humidity and wind speed/direction as well as morespecialized sensors as infrared/visible light radiation, particleconcentration or ionizing radiation.

(a) Ground station. Laptop, a bi-directional modem, a standardRC transmitter and battery chargers

(b) Ground modem. 2.4GHz Digi XBee Series 121 21 Communication options,

http://www.evelta.com/

semiconductors-and-actives/

communication?page=2

2. Ardupilot UAV platform for controlling autonomous multicopters,fixed-wing aircraft, traditional helicopters and ground rovers.

11

Page 12: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Stage Description

0 Germination / sprouting / bud development1 Leaf development (main shoot)2 Formation of side shoots / tillering3 Stem elongation or rosette growth / shoot development

(main shoot)4 Development of harvestable vegetative plant parts or

vegetatively propagated organs / booting (main shoot)5 Inflorescence emergence (main shoot) / heading6 Flowering (main shoot)7 Development of fruit8 Ripening or maturity of fruit and seed9 Senescence, beginning of dormancy

Table 2: Principal growth stages

0

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 9

9

9

9

9

9

9

9

9

9

SchemeFrui

tRi

peni

ng

Senescence Germ sprouting

Leaves

Inflorescence

Flowering Side shoots

Roset

tes

Plan

tp

arts

Figure 1: Subdivision of thedevelopmental cycle of coffeeplants

3. Flying capabilities. Flight controllers compared22 22 http://oddcopter.com/

flight-controllers/Gyro Stabilization Ability to easily keep the copter stable and level

under the pilot’s control. This is a standard feature of all flightcontrol boards.

Self Leveling Ability to let go of the pitch and roll stick on thetransmitter and have the copter stay level.

Care Free The pilot can control the copter as if it is pointing in itsoriginal direction as the orientation of the copter changes.

Altitude Hold Ability to hover a certain distance from the groundwithout having to manually adjust the throttle.

Position Hold Ability to hover at a specific location.

Return Home Ability to automatically return to the point wherethe copter initially took off.

12

Page 13: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Waypoint Navigation Ability to set specific points on a map thatcopter will follow as part of a flight plan.

Board Ope

nso

urce

Gyr

ost

abil

ised

Self

leve

ling

Car

efr

ee

Alt

itud

eho

ld

Posi

tion

hold

Ret

urn

hom

e

Way

poin

tna

viga

tion

ArduCopter APM 2.5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

AutoQuad 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Hobbyking KK2.1.5 4 4 4

MultiWii Pro 2.0 w/GPS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Pixhawk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Table 4: Controller web links,ArduCopter, AutoQuad,Hobbyking, MultiWii, Pixhawk

Tea crop monitoring by Tea Board & National Remote Sensing Centre

A tea plantation monitoring project is being undertaken by an affili-ated institute, the National Remote Sensing Centre23, Indian Space 23 http://www.nrsc.gov.in/Earth_

Observation_Applications_

Agriculture_Tea_Management.htmlResearch Organisation.

“A pilot study was carried out in Bagdogra area of North Bengalto address the Remote Sensing and GIS (Geographic InformationSystem) capability in tea area development using multispectral andmulti-resolution satellite data supported by ground intelligence toaddress precise mapping of the tea gardens with section details,pruning types, shade tree density, garden landuse and gap areas.

“Based upon the encouraging results of the pilot study, [the]Tea Board [..] agreed formally to initiate the project on “Tea areadevelopment and management using Remote Sensing and GIS”.

“The Tea Board will facilitate

• the collection of garden maps and relevant data,

• field surveys and

• interaction with garden managers, and

• validation of results.

“Based on several interactions with tea garden managers, anResearch and Development component [is part of the] project, apartfrom operations and capacity building, [involving].

• remote estimation of green leaf yield,

13

Page 14: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

• forecasting of some pests and diseases,

• surface hydrology and drainage planning

Objectives

Major objectives include,

• Mapping of tea growing areas (major, medium and small) usinghigh-resolution Indian satellite data.

• Analysis of detailed tea garden land-use and mapping.

• Geo-referencing of tea garden maps with respect to satellite dataand creation of spatial garden database.

• Analysis of canopy density of the shade trees using Cartosat-1satellite data and mapping to characterize optimal, high or lowdensity classes.

• Identification of degraded tea areas for uprooting and re-plantation.

• Generation of fine quality Digital Elevation Model (DEM) usingCartosat-1 satellite stereo pair.

• Use of Cartosat-1 DEM for generation of potential surface waterflow lines for diversion of flood water.

• Site suitability analysis for new area of tea plantation.

• Monitoring uprooting and re-plantation activities.

• Generation of comprehensive database of natural resources andinfrastructure of Tea gardens.

• Development of comprehensive web-enabled GIS and MIS for theTea gardens to establish network between Tea Board, Tea ResearchInstitutes and Tea Gardens for better management and also toprovide technical support to Tea gardens.

Outputs

• Geographically referenced hard- and soft-copy digital maps (incadastral scale24) of all the tea gardens at section- [level resolution] 24 (of a map or survey) shows the extent,

value, and ownership of land, especiallyfor taxation.

including small growers, most of [whom] are unregistered [withthe] tea board.

• Updated information on garden land-use, shade tree density, gapareas, garden areas affected by river bank erosion, changes in theriver course.

14

Page 15: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

• Availability of section-, division-, garden-level detail includingstatic and dynamic attribute information on the desktop for aug-menting informed decision making.

• Near real time acquisition of information across different teagardens through web enabled data sharing.

Outcomes

• Monitoring uprooting and re-plantation especially in the lowyielding areas of old bushes which is the key to long term compet-itiveness of the Indian tea industry.

• Will help [document] small growers enabling them to avail fin-ancial assistance from the Tea Board or from banks and financialinstitutions.

• News flash pertaining to different stakeholders through tea boardportal.

• Long term policy formulation

Year Ara

bica

Rob

usta

Tota

l

2007–08 92,500 169,500 262,000

2008–09 79,500 182,800 262,300

2009–10 94,600 195,000 289,600

2010–11 94,140 207,860 302,000

2011–12 101,500 212,500 314,000

2012–13 98,600 219,600 318,200

2013–14 90,000 190,000 280,000

Table 5: Coffee production intonnes, Coffee Board of India &Karnataka Planters’ Association

Precipitation in Karnataka districts of interest

Chikmagalur

PlaceholderIMD Raingauge Station ListKottigehar toll, Chickmagalur, Mudigere t.o., Aldur, Gonibidu,

Seegehali estate, Chickmagalur (Obsy), Tarikere, Koppa balgadi,Narasimharajapur, Sringeri, Balehonnur (Obsy), Malapur, Attigundi,Lakkavalli, Lingada hally ps, Hariharpur, Kalasa , Hirebyle, Bale-honnur, Mudigere r.r.s., Jayapura, C.r.s. Koppa, Kigga, Kamardi,Hunaseghatta, Kalasapur, Sakrepatna, Lingada hally sf, Yammidoddi,

15

Page 16: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Traditional coffee-growing areas

Non-traditional growing areas

North East region

Assam Nagaland

Arunachal Pradesh

MeghalayaManipur

TripuraMizoram

AndhraPradesh

Orissa

Karnataka

TamilNadu

Kerala

16

Page 17: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Hassan

Chikmagalur

Kodagu

17

Page 18: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Post-monsoon estimate ‘13–‘14 Final estimate ‘12–‘13

State/District Ara

bica

Rob

usta

Tota

l

Ara

bica

Rob

usta

Tota

l

KarnatakaChikmagalur 38280 32220 70500 37325 40300 77625

Kodagu 21075 95500 116575 21300 98700 120000

Hassan 19175 11450 30625 18800 13800 32600

Sub total 78530 139170 217700 77425 152800 230225

KeralaWayanad 0 56925 56925 0 53475 53475

Travancore 900 6800 7700 975 7200 8175

Nelliampathis 1100 1550 2650 1100 1450 2550

Sub total 2000 65275 67275 2075 62125 64200

Tamil NaduPulneys 6975 325 7300 6425 255 6680

Nilgiris 1800 4050 5850 1625 3765 5390

Shevroys (Salem) 3875 50 3925 3450 50 3500

Anamalais (Coimbatore) 1300 500 1800 1300 500 1800

Sub total 13950 4925 18875 12800 4570 17370

Non-traditional AreasAndhra Pradesh 6950 60 7010 5890 30 5920

Orissa 440 0 440 310 0 310

Sub Total 7390 60 7450 6200 30 6230

North Eastern Region 130 70 200 100 75 175

Grand Total (India) 102000 209500 311500 98600 219600 318200

Table 6: Production of coffee inmajor states/districts of India(in MT), Coffee Board of Indiahttp://www.indiacoffee.org/

coffee-statistics.html

Malandur health, Kadur, Yegati, Ajjampur, Sivani ps, Bukkambudi,Sigatagere, Panchanhalli, Basur, Ajjampura polic, Ajjampura c.b.s,Birur, Giriyapur, Hirenallur, Shivani rly.stn., Balehonnur p/crs,Burapura, Chandpura.

Kodagu

IMD Rainguage Station ListKurchy/irrupa, Virajpet, Karike, Makuta, Sampaji, Madapur, Kar-

godu, Talakauveri, Naladi, Mundrote, Galibidu, Dabkoda, Balecove,Mercara (Obsy), Mercara, K.ngr/frazerpet, Somwarpet t.o., Ammathy,Napoklu, Pulingoth, Sanivarsanthe, Poonampet ib, Bhagamandala(Hydro), Dubari , Suntikoppa, Hudugur, Srimangala, Bhagamandala,Ponnampet ars, Somwarpet, Kudige, Anekad, Madikere jail, Karada,Avandoor, Maladare forest, Watekolly, Poorlatti, Mallikarjuna, Har-angi, Murnad, Siddapura, Surlabbi, Nagarhole, Karmadu, Murkhal,Thittimatti, Mathigodu fores, Kallahalla, Devamachi, Dabsad, Kudli-pet, Shantahalli.

18

Page 19: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Name of the Region 2012–13

<10 >10 Total

Chikmagalur 14853 1166 16019

Hassan 11228 350 11578

Madikeri 20422 236 20658

Virajpet 22864 253 23117

Total for Karnataka 69367 2005 71372

Kerala 77110 275 77385

Tamil Nadu 15379 343 15722

Total for Traditional Areas 161856 2623 164479

Non Traditional Areas 118402 26 118428

NER Region 8002 9 8011

Grand total 288260 2658 290918

Table 7: Number of hold-ings, Coffee Board of Indiahttp://www.indiacoffee.org/

coffee-statistics.html

Year Quantity, Metric Tonnes

2000 60000

2001 64000

2002 68000

2003 70000

2004 75000

2005 80200

2006 85000

2007 90000

2008 94400

2009 102000

2010 108000

2011 (prov.) 115000

Table 8: Estimated do-mestic coffee consump-tion, Coffee Board of Indiahttp://www.indiacoffee.org/

coffee-statistics.html

Hassan

IMD Rainguage Station ListMaranahalli ttg, Ramnathpuram, Hasti estate, Gendehally, Saklespur,

Alur, Yeslurpet, Kenchammana hte, Ossoor estate, Mallipatna,Sukravarasathy, Ubban estate, Basapatna, Alur (phc), Sakalesh-pur i.b., Kunduru, Ballupet, Arkalgud, C.r.patna, Holenarsipur,Grama , Kattaya, Konalur, Hiresave, Halli mysore, Sriramdevar dam,Ganging/gorur, Shantigama, Sravanabelagola, Halkote, H.n. Pur,Hemavathy reserv, Palya, Belur, Hanbal, Arehalli, Belagodu, Hassan(Obsy), Dudda , Bagur, Nuggehalli, Gandasi, Hassan t.o., Salagama,Hassan rly, Javagal, Udaipura, Hagari , D. Hagge, Bicodu , Dod-dabommanthini, Chananahalli, Arsikere t.o., Banavara, Kanakatte,Halebid, Yelware, Arsikere s.rly., Halebeedu, Hosurodu, Bage estate,

19

Page 20: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Gandigi, K. Hosokte, Koragawalli est, Madvapur, Mastigar estate,Sondanahally est, Y.r.p.gorur.

Evapotranspiration

The combination of two separate processes whereby water is lost onthe one hand from the soil surface by evaporation and on the otherhand from the crop by transpiration is referred to as evapotranspira-tion (ET).

Evaporation is the process whereby liquid water is convertedto water vapour (vaporization) and removed from the evaporat-ing surface (vapour removal). Water evaporates from a variety ofsurfaces, such as lakes, rivers, pavements, soils and wet vegeta-tion.http://www.fao.org/docrep/x0490e/x0490e04.htm

Leaf Area Index

Leaf area index (LAI) is the total one-sided area of leaf tissue per unitground surface area. It is a key parameter in ecophysiology, espe-cially for scaling up the gas exchange from leaf to canopy level. Itcharac- terizes the canopyatmosphere interface, where most of the en-ergy fluxes exchange. It is also one of the most difÆcult to quantifyproperly, owing to large spatial and temporal variability. Many meth-ods have been developed to quantify LAI from the ground and someof them are also suitable for describing other structural parameters ofthe canopy.

UAVs can be used by growers of different commodities, regardlessof their crop size and type. Potential applications of this technologyin agriculture include:

• Crop scouting

• Pest distribution mapping

• Crop loss assessment

• Bare soil imagery

• Irrigation and drainage planning

• Yield estimation and monitoring

• Inventory management

• Diagnosis of herbicide injury in crops

• Selection of plants for further breeding

20

Page 21: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

• Sampling of plant pathogens in the air

• Efficient use of chemicals and pesticides

• Safety and security

• Automation and navigation of ground vehicles

• Academic and extension education.

21

Page 22: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Monthly precipitation at Chikmagalur(mm)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec2

00

4

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Figure 2: Source: http://www.imd.gov.in/section/

hydro/distrainfall/webrain/

karnataka/chikmagalur.txt

22

Page 23: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Average temperature at Chikmagalur (◦C)

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug Se

pO

ctN

ov Dec

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Figure 3: Chikmagalur averagetemperatures

23

Page 24: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Cloud cover at Chikmagalur

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug Se

pO

ctN

ov Dec

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Figure 4: Chikmagalur cloudcover

24

Page 25: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

23.2◦C

29.5◦C

14.00%

84.39%

18.54hpa

29.25hpa

0.00mm

2167mm

0/day

0.738/d

3.55mm

5.4mm

Figure 5: Chikmagalur longterm data, 1901–2002, averagetemperature (Celcius), cloudcover (%), vapour pressure(hpa), precipitation (mm/day),ground frost frequency (perday) and reference crop evapo-transpiration (mm/day).

25

Page 26: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

02

00

40

06

00

80

01

00

0

Monthly Precipitation at Chikmagalur

Month, 2004–2012

Prec

ipit

atio

n(m

m)

26

Page 27: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Monthly precipitation at Kodagu (mm)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec2

00

4

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Figure 6: Source: http://www.imd.gov.in/section/

hydro/distrainfall/webrain/

karnataka/kodagu.txt

27

Page 28: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

02

00

40

06

00

80

01

00

01

20

0

Monthly Precipitation at Kodagu

Month, 2004–2012

Prec

ipit

atio

n(m

m)

28

Page 29: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Monthly precipitation at Hassan (mm)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec2

00

4

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Figure 7: Source: http://www.imd.gov.in/section/

hydro/distrainfall/webrain/

karnataka/hassan.txt

29

Page 30: Coffee cropmonitoring draft

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

01

00

20

03

00

40

0

Monthly Precipitation at Hassan

Month, 2004–2012

Prec

ipit

atio

n(m

m)

30