coalition formation and price of anarchy in cournot oligopolies

22
Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies Nicole Immorlica, Evangelos Markakis, and Georgios Piliouras Presentation By Sur Samtani

Upload: sur-samtani

Post on 24-Jan-2017

260 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in CournotOligopoliesNicole Immorlica, Evangelos Markakis, and Georgios Piliouras

Presentation By Sur Samtani

Page 2: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Cournot CompetitionAntoine Augustin Cournot (1801-1877) studies competition in local spring water duopoly

Each firm’s production affects market price

Page 3: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Outline1.Introduce Traditional Cournot Model Formally2.Determine “Price of Anarchy”3.Introduce Modified Cournot Model with Coalition Formation4. Determine “New Price of Anarchy”

Page 4: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

1 2 n

Traditional Cournot CompetitionFirms

. . .

Strategy profile q= (q1, q2, …, qn) Strategy Space: R+

Market

q1 q2 qn

C C C

P(q) = max{0, a-b(q1+q2+…+qn)}

ui = pqi-cqi

c = per unit cost

Page 5: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Relevant TermsSocial Welfare: Total Profit of All Firms Nash Equilibrium: A strategy profile (q1, q2, …, qn) for which no firm i has an incentive to deviate from producing qi (profit will not increase by deviating)Price of Anarchy:

Page 6: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Cournot Model ContinuedFor symmetric cost c and linear price function:

}(a,b,c ∊ R and a>c) P

𝑝 (𝑞 )

c

Qqm

pm

q*

p*

Page 7: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Price of Anarchy in CournotSocial Welfare of Socially Optimum = = E• ∀i, qi = q*• ∀i, ui = Social Welfare of Unique N.E. = = F• Price of Anarchy (P.O.A.) = = (linear with respect to the number of firms)

Page 8: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Coalition Formation Model

. . .

S1 S2 Sk

= Firm

= Coalition

𝑢𝑖=𝑢𝑆 𝑗

¿𝑆 𝑗∨¿¿

for firm i in coalition Sj

Partition of Coalitions ∏= (S1, S2, …, Sk)

Page 9: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Legal Moves: Type 1Si Si

Successful move if and only if all firms forming coalition Si

’ increase their payoffs

Page 10: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Legal Moves: Type 2Si Sj

Successful if and only if all deviating members of Si and all members of Sj improve payoff

Page 11: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Legal Moves: Type 3

Successful if and only if all members of merging coalitions increase payoff

Page 12: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Successful Deviations (cont.)A partition ∏ is stable if there exists no successful deviation of any type

New Coalitional Price of Anarchy:

Page 13: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Restricted Moves• Type 1: • Type 2: • Type 3:

A member of a coalition of ∏, decides to form a singleton coalition on his own. The coalition from which the player left dissolves into singleton players. A member of a coalition of ∏ decides to leave its current coalition Si (where |Si | ≥ 2), and join another coalition of ∏, say Sj . The rest of coalition Si dissolves into singleton players. A set of singleton players of ∏ decide to unite and form a coalition.

Page 14: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Roadmap for Rest of Talk1. Find Conditions on stability for each type of move2. Construct an optimization problem to maximize k

(number of coalitions) given that these conditions hold

3. This will give us the value of k for the worst stable outcome, and we will find the Coalitional Price of Anarchy

Page 15: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Establishing Conditions for StabilityLet si =|Si| for Si∊∏, and assume k ≥ 2 and si ≥ 2,For a player j ∊ Si, j can make a Type 1 move (form his own coalition) or Type 2 move (join existing coalition)• Payoff of Type 1 move for player j : • Payoff of Type 2 move for player j : Since k ≥ 2 and si ≥ 2, u ≥ u’Type 1 move is always the most profitable deviation

Page 16: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Establishing Conditions for Stability (Cont.)

•Current payoff of player in coalition Si: •Payoff of most profitable deviation: •For stability, we must have v≥u , ∀i

Page 17: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Establishing Conditions for Stability (Cont.)Suppose that we have k1 singleton coalitions and k2 non-singleton coalitions:

• Current payoff for singleton coalition: • Payoff after Type 3 move (merge with other singleton coalitions): • Current partition is stable if and only if ≥ ≥

Page 18: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Summary of Stability Constraints

, ∀i≥

k coalitions

k1 singleton coalitions

k2 non-singleton coalitions

si = |Si|

n = number of firms

Page 19: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Optimization Problem

s.t.

k coalitions

k1 singleton coalitions

k2 non-singleton coalitions

si = |Si|

n = number of firms

Page 20: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Price of AnarchyLP yields k1 ≤ and k2 ≤ k ≤ + •Upper Bound for P.O.A.= • Separately Calculated Lower Bound for P.O.A.= •New model results in lower Price of Anarchy than original standard Cournot Model with no Coalition Formation•Conclusion: Firms’ flexibility to collude results in lower P.O.A

Page 21: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

Further Research•More natural coalition formation models (coalitions

don’t break up into singletons)

•Price of Anarchy with non-linear price function

•Price of Anarchy with different model for competition between firms (Bertrand Price Competition)

Page 22: Coalition Formation and Price of Anarchy in Cournot Oligopolies

End