coal vs gas power generation

40
1 as Turbine Combustion System

Upload: udhayakumar-venkataraman

Post on 16-Apr-2017

68 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coal vs gas Power generation

1

Gas Turbine Combustion Systems

Page 2: Coal vs gas Power generation

2

About me

• 2007-Present Solar Turbines Inc., Caterpillar Company

• 2002-2007 Ph.D. Combustion Science, MAE, UCSD

• 2000-2002 General Electric Global Research Center

• 1998-2000 M.S., Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology & University of Stuttgart

Page 3: Coal vs gas Power generation

3

• Motivation to study about Industrial Gas Turbines

• What does combustor do?

• Types of combustors

• Design requirements

• Introduction to combustion chemistry

• Alternative fuels, pollutants, oscillations

• Challenges related with variable load conditions

Page 4: Coal vs gas Power generation

4

Energy Outlook ReportUS DOE

Page 5: Coal vs gas Power generation

5

Trend of world’s energy consumption (Data from US Department of Energy)

1 Quadrillion = 1015, 1 BTU = 1.055x103 J

World’s energy requirement can largely be classified into Electric power, transportation energy

1 Quadrillion BTU = 45M Tons Coal or 1T ft3 Natural Gas or 170M Barrels of crude oil1 Barrel crude oil = 42 gallon = 6.1 GJ of energy

Page 6: Coal vs gas Power generation

6

*Organization of economic cooperation and development

Trend of world’s electricity consumption (Data from US Department of Energy)

Fossil fuels: Coal, gasoline, diesel, natural gas and other petroleum products

Alternative sources of energy: Wind turbines, solar panels, hydroelectric, nuclear, geothermal, tidal, and list goes on…Alternative fuels: Ethanol, bio-diesel, biomass, coke oven gas, syngas, municipal waste, landfill gases, anything rotting…

Major sources of electricity production

Page 7: Coal vs gas Power generation

7

There is a very well established energy infrastructure based on fossil fuels in US and across the globe.

Fuel Reserves (Q)Lifetime (y) No Growth

Lifetime (y) w/ Growth

Coal 24,000 258 140Oil 9280 60 50Gas 6966 90 50

The world’s proven fossil fuel reserves and lifetimes

The advantage of alternative fuels is that the existing infrastructure can be used.

Gas turbines industry is going to stay in business for a long time

Page 8: Coal vs gas Power generation

8

About Solar’s Gas Turbines

Page 9: Coal vs gas Power generation

9

How does this story relate with Gas Turbines Combustion systems?

Types of engines- Power generation: Gas Turbines, Steam Turbines, Nuclear, Hydro-Transportation : diesel, gasoline, aircraft engines (based on gas turbine cycles)

“Strictly speaking, energy is not “consumed”, but rather is converted into different forms.”

Various types of engines are used to achieve this objective.

Steam turbines are similar to gas turbines but they have different principles of operation. Nuclear power plants use nuclear energy to make steam which rotates the steam turbines.

Page 10: Coal vs gas Power generation

10

Gas Turbines find their applications in

- electric power generation, mechanical drive systems, supply of process heat and compressed air, pump drives for gas or liquid pipelines

- jet propulsion, land and sea transport (infancy state)

Industrial turbines or prime movers

Page 11: Coal vs gas Power generation

11

• Solar Turbines Incorporated, a subsidiary of Caterpillar Company is a world leading producer of mid-range (1 MW – 25 MW) industrial gas turbines for use in power generation, natural gas compression, and pumping systems.

• There are 12,500+ engines installed in 102 countries

• Solar ranks as one of the 50 largest exporters in the United States

Page 12: Coal vs gas Power generation

12

Our units are used for power generation, gas compression, and mechanical drive applications

-Power generation is the production of electrical energy whether for stand-by or base load power applications.

- Gas compression applications include gathering (at the well head), transmission (pipeline), re-injection (storage), and pressure boost (compression).

- Mechanical drive applications are units sold as prime-movers for non-Solar packaged driven equipment, whether generators, compressors, or pumps

Page 13: Coal vs gas Power generation

13

Harbor Drive Facility

Page 14: Coal vs gas Power generation

14

Gas Turbines OEMs

Page 15: Coal vs gas Power generation

15

Output 1.2 MW Thermal Eff. 24.5%

Output 4.6 MW Thermal Eff. 29.9%

Output 7.7 MW Thermal Eff. 34.8%

Output 11.2 MW Thermal Eff. 33.9%

Output 15.3 MW Thermal Eff. 35.7%

Output 4.6 MW Thermal Eff. 39.5%

Page 16: Coal vs gas Power generation

16

Latest addition…

Output 22.3 MW Thermal Eff. 40%

Page 17: Coal vs gas Power generation

17

1) Compression

2) Combustion

3)Expansion (Turbine)

Output Shaft Power

Output Shaft Power

Two ShaftTurbine Engine

Single ShaftSingle ShaftTurbine EngineTurbine Engine

Power Generation

Mechanical Drive

Page 18: Coal vs gas Power generation

18

Simplistic Gas Turbines working principles

1-2 Isentropic compression (in a compressor)2-3 Constant pressure heat addition (in a combustor)3-4 Isentropic expansion (in a turbine)4-1 Constant pressure heat rejection

Page 19: Coal vs gas Power generation

19

Petrobras, offshore Brazil, Power generation and crude oil production

Power generation for gas fields in Siberia

Natural gas transmission, Desert environment

Page 20: Coal vs gas Power generation

20

Solar’s presence in San Diego- two, soon to be three, Titan 130's at UCSD- two Taurus 60's at SDSU- some recuperated Saturns at landfills in San Marcos and Santee - a Saturn genset at the Hotel Del- a Mercury 50 at the VA hospital- two Mercurys at Qualcomm- two Centaur 40s at the Balboa Naval Hospital- a Taurus 60 at the Children's Hospital

Page 21: Coal vs gas Power generation

21

List of companies and their products

Page 22: Coal vs gas Power generation

22

Page 23: Coal vs gas Power generation

23

Page 24: Coal vs gas Power generation

24

Page 25: Coal vs gas Power generation

25

Industrial Aero-derivativesOverhaul Life 48,000 hours 30,000 hoursHot section inspection 8000 hours 6000 hoursOverhaul Life On-site Gas generator removalEngine weight Heavy Duty LightFast start capability No YesTolerance to poor fuel Fair PoorEase of automation Good GoodSuitable for off-shore Fair GoodPower Up to 325 MW Up to 55 MWThermal Efficiency 25-39% 25-42%

Difference between Heavy Duty and Aeroderivative Turbines

Page 26: Coal vs gas Power generation

26

Evolution of products : Uprates

Page 27: Coal vs gas Power generation

27

Performance of Gas Turbines is limited by1. Component efficiencies2. Turbine working temperature

Current state of the artPr = 35/1components = 85-90%TIT = 1650 K

Page 28: Coal vs gas Power generation

28

What makes Gas Turbines attractive for Industrial prime movers?Advantages• Very high power-to-weight ratio, compared to reciprocating engines• Smaller than most reciprocating engines of the same power rating• Fewer moving parts than reciprocating engines• Low operating pressures• High operation speeds• Low lubricating oil cost and consumption• High reliability• Goes for 30-50K hours before first overhaul. Usually runs for 100K-300K hours (10+ years) life cycle

Disadvantages• Cost is much greater than for a similar-sized reciprocating engine since the material must be stronger and more heat resistant. Machining operations are more complex• Usually less efficient than reciprocating engines, especially at idle• Delayed response to changes in power settingsThese make GT less suitable for road transport and helicopters

Page 29: Coal vs gas Power generation

29

Some Basics

Page 30: Coal vs gas Power generation

30

Gas Turbine componentsInlet system Collects and directs air into the gas turbine. Often, an air cleaner and silencer are part of the inlet system. It is designated for a minimum pressure drop while maximizing clean airflow into the gas turbine.

Compressor Provides compression, and, thus, increases the air density for the combustion process. The higher the compression ratio, the higher the total gas turbine efficiency . Low compressor efficiencies result in high compressor discharge temperatures, therefore, lower gas turbine output power.

Combustor Adds heat energy to the airflow. The output power of the gas turbine is directly proportional to the combustor firing temperature; i.e., the combustor is designed to increase the air temperature up to the material limits of the gas turbine while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop.

Page 31: Coal vs gas Power generation

31

Gas Producer Turbine Expands the air and absorbs just enough energy from the flow to drive the compressor. The higher the gas producer discharge temperature and pressure, the more energy is available to drive the power turbine, therefore, creating shaft work.

Power Turbine Converts the remaining flow energy from the gas producer into useful shaft output work. The higher the temperature difference across the power turbine, the more shaft output power is available.

Exhaust System Directs exhaust flow away from the gas turbine inlet. Often a silencer is part of the exhaust system. Similar to the inlet system, the exhaust system is designed for minimum pressure losses.

Page 32: Coal vs gas Power generation

32

What drives Research and Development work in Gas Turbines?

• In 1950’s component efficiencies• In 1990’s emissions• In 21st century it is emissions and alternative fuels• Nature of application and location are always the factors

Page 33: Coal vs gas Power generation

33

Simplistic Gas Turbines working principles

1-2 Isentropic compression (in a compressor); h2-h1 = mCp(T2-T1)2-3 Constant pressure heat addition (in a combustor); h3-h2 = mCp(T3-T2)3-4 Isentropic expansion (in a turbine); h3-h4 = mCp(T3-T4)4-1 Constant pressure heat rejection

Page 34: Coal vs gas Power generation

34

Gas TurbineminCpTin(min+mF)CpTout

Shaft power

mFqRcomb

Page 35: Coal vs gas Power generation

35

Consider Centaur and Mercury

Known P ratio = 10TIT = 1350 KCompressor Eff. = 0.86Turbine Eff. = 0.89Heat exchanger effectiveness = 0.8Ambient temperature and pressure, 300 K, 1 barSpecific heat Cp = 1.005 kJ/Kg-KSpecific heat ratio = 1.4

Calculate (a) Compressor outlet temperature (b) Turbine out temperature (c) Compressor work (d) Turbine work (e) back work ratio (f) Efficiency for ideal, actual, and recuperator engine

Page 36: Coal vs gas Power generation

36

First Law: WVVhhQ 21

2212 2

1

2

2

0Vhh Stagnation enthalpy

Compressor work )( 1212 TTchh p

Turbine work )( 4343 TTchh p

Heat input )( 2323 TTchh p

For isentropic process 4

3

1

1

2

1

2

1

TT

rPP

TT

Page 37: Coal vs gas Power generation

37

Thermal Efficiency )()()(

inputenergy outputnet work

23

1243

TTcTTcTTc

p

pp

1

11r

Net work out )( 1243 TTcTTcW ppnet

Page 38: Coal vs gas Power generation

38

1

2’2

3

44’

Equipment efficiencies

0102

01'

02

TTTT

C

1

1

01

02010102

PPT

TTC

1

0403030403 /

11PP

TTT T

'0403

0403

TTTT

T

T

S

Process 1-2’ and 3-4’ idealProcess 1-2 and 3-4 actual

Page 39: Coal vs gas Power generation

39

1

2’2

3

44’

T

S

Recuperator

5

6

Heat exchanger effectiveness

0204

0205

TTTT

)()()(

inputenergy outputnet work

53

1243

TTcTTcTTc

p

pp

Page 40: Coal vs gas Power generation

40

Variation of Cp with temperature