cn22ho.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
1/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 1
Management Control Systems,
Transfer Pricing, andMultinational Considerations
Chapter22
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
2/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 2
Overview
What is a Management Control System?
Centralized vs. decentralized control structure
Transfer pricing: Function
Setting TPs
Dual TPs
Negotiated TPs (Calculating Min. & Max. range)
International tax issues
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
3/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 3
Management Control Systems
A management control system is a means
of gathering and using information.
It guides the behavior of managers and
employees.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
4/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 4
Management Control Systems
Financial data
Formal control system
Nonfinancial data
Informal control system
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
5/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 5
Evaluating Management
Control Systems
Motivation Goal congruence Effort
Lead to rewards
Monetary Nonmonetary
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
6/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 6
Organization (control) Structure
Total decentralization
Total centralization
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
7/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 7
Benefits of Decentralization
Creates greater responsiveness to local needs
Leads to gains from quicker decision making
Increases motivation of subunit managers
Assists management development and learning
Sharpens the focus of subunit managers
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
8/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 8
Limitations of Decentralization
Suboptimal decision making may occur
Focuses the managers attention on the subunitrather than the organization as a whole
Increases the costs of gathering information
Results in duplication of activities
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
9/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 9
Decentralization in
Multinational CompaniesDecentralization enables country managers to
make decisions that exploit their knowledge
of local business and political conditions.
Multinational corporations often rotate
managers between foreign locations
and corporate headquarters.
Control Problem: Barings Bank (200 yrs old)1995 Nick Leeson caused
over 1 B loss.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
10/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 10
Responsibility Centers
Cost
center
Revenue
center
Investmentcenter
Profitcenter
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
11/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 11
Transfer Pricing
A transfer price is the price one subunit charges
for a product or service supplied to anothersubunit of the same organization.
Intermediate products are the products
transferred between subunits of anorganization.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
12/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 12
Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing should: (1) help achieve
a companys strategies and goals.(2) fit the organizations structure
(3) promote goal congruence
(4) promote a sustained high level
of management effort
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
13/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 13
Transfer-Pricing Methods
Market-based transfer prices
Cost-based transfer prices
Negotiated transfer prices
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
14/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 14
Market-Based Transfer Prices
By using market-based transfer prices
in a perfectly competitive market, a
company can achieve the following:
Goal congruence
Management effortSubunit performance evaluation
Subunit autonomy
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
15/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 15
Market-Based Transfer Prices
Market prices also serve to evaluate the
economic viability and profitabilityof divisions individually.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
16/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 16
Market-Based Transfer Prices
When supply outstrips demand, market prices
may drop well below their historical average.Distress prices are the drop in prices
expected to be temporary.
Basing transfer prices on depressed market prices will not
always lead to optimal decisions for an organization.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
17/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 17
Cost-based Transfer Prices
When transfer prices are
based on full cost plus a
markup, suboptimal
decisions can result.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
18/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 18
Dual Transfer Prices
An example of dual pricing is for Larry & Co.
to credit the Selling Division with112% of the full cost transfer price of $24.64
per barrel of crude oil.
Debit the Buying Division with the market-basedtransfer price of $23 per barrel of crude oil.
And debit a corporate account for the difference!
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
19/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 19
Negotiated Transfer Prices
Negotiated transfer prices arise from the
outcome of a bargaining process between
selling and buying divisions.
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
20/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 20
General Guideline: min. & max.
transfer price
Minimum transfer price= Incremental costs per unit incurred
up to the point of transfer
+ Opportunity costs per unit to the selling divisionIncremental cost often times = variable cost
Opportunity costs often times = lost CM
Opportunity costs could = lost savings
Maximum transfer price = Market price
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
21/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 21
Min. & Max. transfer price--examples
Some examples:
(1) Slowcar
(2) S.F. Manufacturing
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
22/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 22
Slowcar Company
The Assembly Division of SLOWCAR Company has offered to purchase90,000 batteries from the Electrical Division (ED) for $104 per unit. At anormal volume of 250,000 batteries per year, production costs per battery are:
Direct materials $40
Direct labor 20
Variable factory overhead 12
Fixed factory overhead 42
Total $114
The Electrical Division has been selling 250,000 batteries per year to outsidebuyers for $136 each. Capacity is 350,000 batteries/year. The AssemblyDivision has been buying batteries from outside suppliers for $130 each.
Should the Electrical Division manager accept the offer? Will an internaltransfer be of any benefit to the company?
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
23/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 23
SF Manufacturing
The SF Manufacturing Co. has two divisions in Iowa, the Supply Division andthe BUY Division. Currently, the BUY Division buys a part (3,000 units)from Supply for $12.00 per unit. Supply wants to increase the price to BUY to$15.00. The controller of BUY claims that she cannot afford to go that high,as it will decrease the divisions profit to near zero. BUY can purchase the
part from an outside supplier for $14.00. The cost figures for Supply are: Direct Materials $3.25
Direct Labor 4.75
Variable Overhead 0.60
Fixed Overhead 1.20
A. If Supply ceases to produce the parts for BUY, it will be able to avoid one-
third of the fixed MOH. Supply has no alternative uses for its facilities.Should BUY continue to get the units from Supply or start to purchase theunits from the outside supplier? (From the standpoint of SF as a whole).
(What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?)
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
24/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 24
SF Mfg.continued
Now, assume that Supply could use the facilities currently used to produce the3,000 units for BUY to make 5,000 units of a different product. The newproduct will sell for $16.00 and has the following costs:
Direct Materials $3.00
Direct Labor 4.30
Variable Overhead 5.40
B. What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?
C. What should be done from the companys point of view? Why?
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
25/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 25
Comparison of Methods
Achieves Goal Congruence
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: Often, but not always
Negotiated: Yes
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
26/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 26
Comparison of Methods
Useful for Evaluating Subunit Performance
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based:Difficult, unless transfer
price exceeds full cost
Negotiated: Yes
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
27/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 27
Comparison of Methods
Motivates Management Effort
Market Price: Yes
Cost-Based:
Yes, if based on budgeted
costs; less incentive ifbased on actual cost
Negotiated: Yes
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
28/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost AccountingL.DuCharme
28
Comparison of Methods
Preserves Subunit Autonomy
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: No, it is rule based
Negotiated: Yes
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
29/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost AccountingL.DuCharme
29
Comparison of Methods
Other Factors
Market Price: No market may exist
Cost-Based:Useful for determining
full-cost; easy to implement
Negotiated:Bargaining takes time and
may need to be reviewed
-
7/29/2019 CN22HO.ppt
30/30
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme30
Multinational Transfer Pricing
IRC Section 482 requires that transfer prices
for both tangible and intangible property
between a company and its foreign division
be set to equal the price that would be
charged by an unrelated third party in a
comparable transaction (arms length).This still leaves a little room to wiggle.