cmbs/subprime financial crisis: e&o and d&o insurance issues may 16, 2008 carl schwartz...
TRANSCRIPT
CMBS/Subprime Financial Crisis:E&O And D&O Insurance IssuesMay 16, 2008Carl SchwartzElliott M. Kroll
3
Index Performance Comparison(From ING Clarion Real Estate Securities, U.S. Real Estate Securities, Market Commentary)
• Index Performance• • 5 Year•
• •
• MSCI US REIT Index• • 18.2%•
• Dow Jones Wilshire Real Estate Securities Index• • 18.9%•
• FTSE NAREIT • -• Equity REIT Index• • 18.3%•
• S&P 500 Index• • 11.3%•
• Russell 2000 Index• • 14.9%•
• Lehman Government/Corporate Bond• • 5.0%• •
4
Holders of Commercial & Multifamily Mortgage Leases ($ billions)(From Commercial Mortgage Securities Association, Compendium of Statistics)
5
CMBS Issuance ($ billions)(From Commercial Mortgage Securities Association, Compendium of Statistics)
6
CMBS Weekly Spreads to Treasuries and Swaps (From Commercial Mortgage Securities Association, Compendium of Statistics)
7
Insurance Coverage Issues
• Who is suing whom?
• What is the nature of claims asserted?
• What are the potential E&O and D&O coverage issues?
8
Categories of Real Estate-Related Claims
• Subprime mortgage sales to homeowners and bundling of groups of mortgage loans
• CMBS market disruptions
• Rating, securitization and insurance of real estate debt
• Distribution of securitized debt
9
Real Estate Related Securities and Mortgage Claims/Defendants
• Consumer actions (including class actions) v. Mortgage lenders, title insurers, mortgage brokers:
• Mortgage insurers v. Subprime lenders:
• Shareholder derivative suits
• Lenders v. Banks • Suits by State Attorney
Generals against Investment banks and investment advisors
• Hedge fund investors against Asset managers
• Claims against rating agencies
• Suits against Bond insurers, loan originators,
• Actions against debt securities underwriters for alleged SEC violations.
• Claims by Plan beneficiaries against Plan fiduciaries
• Criminal and regulatory investigations into subprime mortgage sales practices:
10
Real Estate Related Securities and Mortgage Claims/Defendants• Borrowers (likely class actions) v. Mortgage lenders:
– Inadequate disclosure of terms of loans (e.g. failure to properly disclose points, pre-payment penalties, “teaser” rates and adjustable nature of loan
– Failure to investigate brokers or supervise employees– Improper reporting to credit agencies– Discriminatory/predatory lending/advertising practices– Statutory violations (Truth in Lending Act/Unfair Competition Act)
• Mortgage insurers v. Subprime lenders:– force lenders to buy back or replace loans that insurer insured
and that were made fraudulent or in violation of lender’s standards
• Lenders v. Banks – improper margin calls and flawed valuation of underlying
collateral by banks that purchased or financed the loans• Criminal and regulatory investigations into subprime mortgage sales
practices:– FBI investigations of companies that participated in subprime
lending
11
Rating, Securitization and Insurance Claims/Defendants• Claims against Rating agencies
– failure to properly rate CDOs• Regulatory investigations into anticompetitive conduct in debt rating
industry• Claims against bond insurers unable to make contractually-obligated
payments• Borrowers v. Investment banks
– providing financial backing to an aggressive lender despite its questionable business practices
• Shareholders v. Lenders– misrepresentation and omission related to accounting for
residuals; bad valuation; poor underwriting standards• Investors in mortgage backed securities v. Funds
– misrepresentation, bad pricing, failing to follow investment guidelines
• Bond purchasers v. bond issuers and affiliates• Bond issuers and affiliates v. Loan originators• Loan originator shareholders v. Underwriters and auditors of loan
originators.
12
Distribution of Securitized Debt Claims/Defendants
• Plan beneficiaries v. Plan fiduciaries
• Clients v. Investment advisors
• Shareholders v. Public companies with substantial subprime securities holdings
• Institutional Investors v. Underwriters/Banks who securitized and sold mortgages (e.g. misrepresenting quality of underlying loans, covering up delinquencies, misrepresenting coverage available for foreclosures)
13
Estimates Of E&O/D&O Exposure To Subprime Losses• $2 -3 billion in D&O losses
(Guy Carpenter Specialty Practice Briefing, Nov. 2007)
• $3.6 billion for D&O losses (Advisen Ltd. 2/08)
• $8-9 billion for both E&O and D&O losses (National Underwriter P&C, Jan 28, 2008 referring to January 2008 Bear Stearns analyst report)
• Estimates do not include investment losses incurred by insurers through investment of their premium dollars
• Basis for estimates unclear– Valuation of loss
entirely problematical at this point
• Insured v. uninsured losses
• Who are the actual defendants? – What is the actual
impact on D&O - Side A Coverage?
14
Number of Subprime-Related Lawsuits
• According to Navigant Consulting Study:
– As of 12/31/07 -- 278 subprime related lawsuits
– As of 3/31/08 – 478 subprime related lawsuits
15
E&O/D&O Coverage• Is there a “Claim”?
– Does definition expressly include administrative/regulatory proceedings and investigations?
• E.g. “. . . a civil, administrative or regulatory proceeding against any Insured Person commenced by the filing of a notice of charges, investigative order or similar document.”
– “formal” vs. “informal” investigation – some definitions only cover “formal” investigations
– Some definitions expressly include:• subpoenas• target letters• “investigations” without distinguishing
between “formal”/”informal”
16
“First Made And Reported During Policy Period”
• Claim Must Be First Made And Reported During Policy Period
– Did the insured become aware, prior to the policy period, of a Claim, or notice of facts and circumstances that may give rise to a Claim, concerning alleged subprime-related losses?
17
Who Is An “Insured”
• E&O policies often define “insured” more broadly to include the company itself, as well as directors, officers, employees and third parties for whose actions the insured is legally responsible.
• D&O policies typically include directors and officers and, in some circumstances, the company and/or employees– Does policy provide “entity coverage” (Part C
Coverage)?– Is Part C Coverage limited to “Securities
Claims”
18
Definition of “Loss”
• Typically excludes:– Punitive damages– Taxes– Fines– Penalties (civil or criminal)– Multiple Damages– Restitution
19
“Professional Services”
• E&O policies expressly afford coverage for “professional services”
• Definitions can vary depending upon industry:– Lenders (“the origination, sale, pooling and
servicing of mortgage loans secured by real property . . .)
– Financial services firms (“services that an Insured renders pursuant to an agreement with a customer or client, as long as the customer pays a fee, commission, or other compensation . . .”
• D&O policies generally exclude claims related to rendering of “professional services”
20
“Professional Services” (cont.)
– Investment Banks (“those services performed . . . by the Insured (or by any other person or entity for whose acts, errors, or omissions the Insured is . . . legally responsible for), for the benefit of, or on behalf of a Customer . . . for a fee, commission or other consideration”).
21
E&O/D&O Exclusions
• Dishonesty/Fraud• Violation of Statutes• predatory lending claims exclusion• Fiduciary liability
22
Dishonesty/Fraud Exclusions
• Did the insured act in a fraudulent manner/ engage in intentional conduct/obtain a profit or advantage to which it was not legally entitled:– Improper mortgage sales practices, including
discriminatory lending practices– Improper property valuation practices– Improper waiver of financial requirements
applicable to borrowers– Reckless/intentional misrepresentations to:
• homebuyers• buyers of securitized subprime loans• Investors regarding exposure to
housing/credit crisis• Final adjudication v. “in fact” standard
23
Violation of Statutes
• Some policies only exclude “willful” violation of statute
• Some policies exclude only certain statutory violations (e.g. civil rights laws, antitrust laws and/or unfair competition statutes)
• Some policies do not exclude statutory violations
24
Specific Endorsements
• Some policies have an endorsement excluding predatory lending claims.
• Some policies contain exclusions barring claims arising from any investor’s interest in mortgage-backed securities or the filing of any registration statement therewith, unless the claim results from the rendering of “Professional Services.”
25
Fiduciary Liability Insurance
• Most D&O/E&O policies exclude fiduciary liability exposures and those exposures pertaining to the ERISA
• Fiduciary liability policy may apply if a pension/retirement fund is largely invested in subprime securities.
• Under ERISA, plan fiduciaries can be held personally liable for losses to a benefit plan incurred as a result of their alleged errors, omissions, or breach of fiduciary duties.
26
Fiduciary Liability Insurance (cont.)
• Insureds: – trust or employee benefit plan – any trustee, officer or employee of the trust or
employee benefit plan– employer who is sole sponsor of a plan– any other individual or organization
designated as a fiduciary.
27
Fiduciary Liability Insurance (cont.)
• Alleged “wrongful acts” may include:– Improper advice or disclosure – Inappropriate selection of advisors or service
providers – Imprudent investments – Lack of investment diversity – Breach of responsibilities or fiduciary duties
imposed by ERISA – Negligence in the administration of a plan – Conflict of interest with regard to investments
28
CONCLUSION
• Litigations will be prevalent• The list of target defendants will be wide• Plaintiff attorneys will be “imaginative”
– New types of claims should be expected by state agencies, regulators, investors and consumers
• Policyholders need to promptly cooperate and coordinate with their insurers– Choice of counsel– Response to investigations/pre-suit claims
• Compliance with policy terms regarding notice to insurer (in writing, within policy period, specific address, etc.)