clothing and infection control (nj talk)
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Michael Edmond, MD, MPH, MPARichard P. Wenzel Professor of Internal Medicine │ Hospital Epidemiologist
It’s Time to Hang Up the White Coat!
Goals
• To raise awareness of the role of clothing in the transmission of pathogens in the healthcare setting
• To examine the conflict between optimal infection prevention and professional values with regard to clothing
The patient-provider encounter
• Common points of physical contact– Hands/
wrists– Sleeves– Stethoscope– Wristwatch
Contact precautions
• Patients with epidemiologically important organisms:
– Placed in a private room or cohorted with another patient infected or colonized with the same organism
– All persons don gowns & gloves on entry to the room
• Based on the evidence that clothing can become contaminated & the assumption that pathogens on contaminated clothing can be transmitted to patients
Bare below the elbows:
How it began
• In January 2008, the UK’s NHS mandated measures to decrease MRSA & C. difficile in the healthcare setting – Public reporting by hospitals on:
• compliance with infection control & cleanliness standards• all MRSA BSIs & C. difficile cases
– Greater use of single rooms, cohort nursing & better management of isolated patients
– Extension of the hand hygiene campaign to the outpatient setting
– Bare below the elbows
Bare below the elbows
• Short sleeves
• No wrist watch
• No jewelry except wedding band
• No neck ties
• No white coats
• Intent: allow good hand/wrist washing, & avoid contamination of sleeve cuffs
Postulated role of white coats in the transmission of pathogens
Patients’ skin & environment are contaminated with pathogens
White coat becomes contaminated via contact with patient or
environment + infrequent laundering
Pathogens are transmitted from the white coat to a subsequent
patient
Contamination in the clinical setting:
NecktiesStudy Pathogen N % positive
Ditchburn I 2006
S. aureus 40 20
Nurkin S2005
S. aureus
Gram-negative rod
Aspergillus spp
42
42
42
29
12
2
Lopez PJ2009
S. aureus 50 26
Contamination in the clinical setting:
White coats
Study Pathogen N % positive
Wong D1991
S. aureus 100 29
Loh W2000
S. aureusAcinetobacter
10057
Osawa K2003
MRSA 14 79
Treakle AM2008
S. aureus 149 23
Uneke CJ2010
S. aureusPs. aeruginosa
1031910
Munoz-Price LS2012
S. aureusAcinetobacterEnterococcus
2232325
Study Pathogen N % positive
Perry C2001
MRSAVRE
571438
Munoz-Price LS2012
S. aureusAcinetobacterEnterococcus
9711113
Krueger CA2012
S. aureus 268 33
Contamination in the clinical setting:
Scrubs & Uniforms
Survival of Pathogens on FabricLength of survival (days)
Organism Cotton Polyester
S. aureus (methicillin S) 4, 5, 19 10, 12, 56
S. aureus (methicillin R) 4, 5, 21 1, 16, 40
E. faecalis (vancomycin S) 11, 33 >90, >90
E. faecalis (vancomycin R) 18, 22 73, 80
E. faecium (vancomycin S) 22, 90 43, >90
E. faecium (vancomycin R) 62, >90 >80, >80
C. albicans 1, 3 1, 1
C. parapsilosis 9, 27 27, >30
A. fumigatus 1, 10, >30 1, 7, 30
Neely AN, Orloff MM. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:3360-3361.Neely AN, Maley MP. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:724-726.
White coats & scrubs:
Frequency of laundering
Mean frequency (days)
Munoz-Price LS et al. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:565-7.
N=160
White coat:
Frequency of laundering
Pellerin J, Edmond MB et al. Unpublished data, 2013.
Survey of 183 attending physicians, housestaff and medical students
Transfer of pathogens from white coat to skin
Time
(min)
Number of organisms inoculated onto lab coat
106 105 104 103 102
MRSA
1 + + – – –
5 + + – – –
30 + + – – –
VRE
1 + + – – –
5 + + – – –
30 + + – – –
PRA
1 + + – – –
5 + + – – –
30 + + + – –+ = organism transferred from coat to skin
Butler D, Edmond M. J Hosp Infect 2010;75:137-138.
Experimental transmission of bacteria to patients• Clothing was inoculated with Micrococcus (distal tie or
corresponding area on shirt, cuffs of long and short sleeves)• Standardized 2.5 minute exam was performed on a mannequin• Mannequin cultured
Mannequins contaminated
With tie Without tie
Long sleeve 4/5 1/5
Short sleeve 2/5 0/5
Tie vs. no tie: p = 0.036Long sleeve vs short sleeve: p > 0.05
Weber RL et al. J Hosp Infection 2012:80:252-254.
Summary of evidence:
White coats & the cycle of transmission
Component Strength of evidence
Pathogens contaminate patients’ skin & the environment
Conclusive
White coats become contaminated with pathogens
Conclusive
White coats can transmit pathogens Some in vitro evidence
Removal of white coats reduces infection rates
No evidence to date
Biologic plausibility
When is biologic plausibility enough to support a change in practice?
• Potential for benefit
• No risk for harm
• Minimal cost
But without strong evidence for benefit, we should recommend, not mandate, the new practice
The action threshold
• The action threshold is the probability of an outcome at which it makes sense to undertake an intervention OR how sure to you need to be?
• AT = harm / improvement
0% 100%
Cancer chemotherapy
Antibiotics for strep pharyngitis
Gross R. Making Medical Decisions, 1999:45-51.
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to skydiving
• Objective: To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge.
• Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).• Main outcome measure: Death or major trauma.• Results: We were unable to identify any randomized
controlled trials of parachute intervention.• Conclusions: As with many interventions intended to prevent
ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using RCTs. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticized the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organized and participated in a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
Smith GCS, Pell JP. BMJ 2003;327:1459-1461.
Conventional wisdom:The paradox
• On the basis of the same evidence:– We are willing to wrap ourselves in plastic &
restrict patients to their hospital room (contact precautions)
– We are not willing to eliminate white coats & ties
Origin of the white coat
Late 1800s: Earliest use was in the operating room
Instruction in Surgery: Scene in the Operating Room Amphitheater of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 1888.
Early 1900s: Physicians began to wear white coats outside the OR to reinforce the stereotype of physicians as scientists
Howard Kelly, MD Professor of Gynecology, Johns
Hopkins Hospital, 1920
Functions of the white Coat
• Storage
• Protects clothing
• Identification
• Warmth
• Symbolism
The White Coat as Symbol
• Purity• Cleanliness• Superhuman power• Candor• Trust• Integrity• Goodness
• Hierarchy & authority• Control• Social & economic
privilege• Inclusion in an elite
community• Separation from the
mass of society because of superior knowledge & thinking skills
Blumhagen DW. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:111-6.Wear D. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:734-7.Flannery MC. Thyroid 2001;11:947-51.Russell PC. Teach Learn Med 2002;14:56-9.
Reasons for wearing a white coat
Warmth12%
Munoz-Price LS et al. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:565-7.
N = 160
Pellerin J, Edmond MB et al. Unpublished data, 2013.
Percentage of respondents who believe the white coat can transmit pathogens
White coat as vector?
Surveys of patient attitudes regarding physician attire
Which doctor would you prefer?
• Graduated near the bottom of his class
• Failed board certification exam on first attempt
• Has difficulties with communication
• Several nurses & medical students have filed complaints against him for dehumanizing comments
• Graduated near the top of his class
• Scored at the 95th percentile on board certification exam
• Numerous patients have written letters to hospital administration regarding his kind demeanor & exceptional availability
Patient preference studies
Hathorn IF et al. Clinical Otolaryngology 2008;33:505-506.Pothier DD et al. British Medical Journal 2007;335:684-b.Neiderhauser A et al. Military Medicine 2009;174:817-820.Palazzo S, Hocken DB. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:30-34.
Site Setting N Findings
UK ENT clinic 93 •49% preferred shirt & tie•40% preferred scrubs•11% preferred open collared shirt, sleeves
UK ENT clinic 100 •76% preferred no tie•63% preferred no white coat
Virginia OB-GYN clinic
328 •61% preferred scrubs•86% preferred no white coat or didn’t matter
UK Inpatients 75 •82% felt doctors should not be expected to wear ties
•75% felt doctors should not wear white coats•83% felt scrubs acceptable
Flaws in many studies of patient attitudes regarding physician attire
• Lack external validity– Mostly small, single center studies
• Confounding– Age
– Geography/culture
– Socioeconomic factors
• Bias– Infer professionalism on the basis of attire– Underestimate how patients choose their doctors– Ignore context
Patient preferences for physician attire:Impact of education
Initial Response (%) After intervention (%)
Traditional (tie, white coat) 52 22
Scrubs 24 62
No preference 24 8
Unsure 0 8
Monkhouse SJW. J Hosp Infect 2008;69:408-409.
Before & after survey of 50 randomly selected surgical inpatients in a British hospital
Intervention: patients were given evidence-based information on contamination of clothing
Patient preferences for physician attire:Randomized studies of actual encountersMethod Findings Conclusion
596 patients
Emergency Dept.
Half of patients cared for by MD in white coat + shirt/tie or blouse/slacks vs. half cared for by MD in white coat + scrubs
No significant difference between the groups on 6 questions assessing satisfaction with care
No relationship between appearance & satisfaction110 patients
Pre-op visit by anesthesiologist
Half seen by MD in suit & tie vs. half seen by MD in jeans, open collar shirt & tennis shoes
Post-visit interview: 70% disapproved of jeans, 67% tennis shoes; no significant difference b/w 2 groups with regard to selection of descriptors denoting professionalism or approachability
Baevsky RH et al. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:82-84.Hennessy N. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:219-222.
“I have had the good fortune to encounter a wide and rich spectrum of opinions from patients, friends, and colleagues on the matter of proper physician attire, perhaps encouraged by my absent white coat, absent necktie, shaved head, bilateral black hoop earrings, and tattoos covering approximately 17% of my skin (according to the Lund-Browder burn chart). With only one exception (a mildly demented man in heart failure), every one of the uncommon suggestions to upgrade my appearance for the sake of patient care has come from a physician colleague. In contrast, there have been countless moments of connection with patients who confided that some aspect of my appearance made them feel more comfortable… One can only hope that each doctor-patient interaction affords the participants the chance to transcend the cursory impressions of attire and engage in the “real” work of medicine, the alleviation of suffering and the healing potential of a positive, productive relationship.”
Bianchi MT. J Gen Int Med 2008;23:641-3.
Matt Bianchi, MD, PhD
Differences between humanism & professionalism
Characteristic Humanism Professionalism
Types of problems Universal Local
Sources of learning Human experience Socialization into profession
Motivation Human welfare Strengthening of professional identity
Primary duty To other humans; to society
To the professional group
Cognitive basis Postconventional thinking: judging behavior through deliberation about universal values
Conventional thinking: judging behavior by comparison with the accepted social norms of a specific group
Outcome Links physicians to patients
Separates physicians from patients
Modified from: Goldberg JL. Academic Medicine 2008;83:715-722.
Humanism Professionalism
•Empathy•Compassion•Respect•Integrity
•Appropriate dress•Demeanor•Language•Habits•Touching strangers•Blend clinical care with teaching
•Envision medicine as a science
•Protection of the autonomy & integrity of the profession
•Courage•Loyalty•Patience•Humility
Adapted from: Goldberg JL. Acad Med 2008; 83:715-722.
The White Coat Ceremony
“We do not need to teach students how to put on their white coats, but how to take them off. Rather than cloak the students in the coats of the elite, I would borrow a scene from the 1991 film The Doctor and dress students in the common garb of human frailty: a hospital gown. Vulnerable and slightly exposed, they could stand in front of a crowd that only slightly outnumbers the daily census of an average hospital room and pledge never to forget how unforgiving medical care can be stripping patients down to their bare humanity. Perhaps students would thus embark on their medical education with a reminder of what they share with their patients rather than what sets them apart.”
Goldberg JL. Acad Med 2008; 83:715-722.
What do patients want from their doctors?Observations from both ends of the stethoscope
• Competency• Access
– Undivided attention & active listening during the encounter
– Ability to contact the doctor readily & to be seen quickly when necessary
• Interest in them as patients and people
VCU Medical Center Infection Control Committee recommended (but did not mandate) a bare below the elbow approach in the inpatient setting, 1/09
Scaling back contact precautions
• Patients colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE are placed on contact precautions only under the following conditions:– Outbreak situation– Wound drainage that is not contained within a
dressing– Uncontained respiratory secretions
Preliminary findings 6 months after discontinuing contact precautions for MRSA & VRE
• Institution-wide surveillance (~850 beds) for all device associated infections:
MRSA VRE Device days
CLABSI 1 2* 19,160
CAUTI 0 0 11,807
Possible/probable VAP 0 0 3,431
TOTAL 1 2* 34,848
*both VRE infections were met criteria for mucosal barrier injury BSI
Summary:
Clothing & pathogen transmission
• Clothing has the potential to transmit pathogens• The white coat serves the doctor & the profession
to a much greater extent than the patient– Vestigial article of clothing that is neither necessary
nor sufficient for good patient care
• Maximizing patient safety should trump concerns for “professional” appearance
• SHEA guidance document on healthcare worker attire is in press
Follow our blog!
On the web:www.stopinfections.org
OR
On Facebook:hospital.infection
OR
On Twitter:@eliowa@mike_edmond