closing the achievement gap: poverty funding calculation update
DESCRIPTION
Closing the Achievement Gap: Poverty Funding Calculation Update. Michael Elliott State School Fund Coordinator Oregon Department of Education [email protected]. Previous Calculation HB 2098 Data Set Calculations Case Study Data Runs. Overview of Poverty Calculation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Closing the Achievement Gap:
Poverty Funding Calculation Update
Michael ElliottState School Fund Coordinator
Oregon Department of [email protected]
Overview of Poverty Calculation• Previous Calculation• HB 2098• Data Set• Calculations• Case Study• Data Runs
Current DataTwo Sets of Data:Large districts (greater than 2,500 ADMr)
◦Census Data◦Change in ADMr
Current DataSmall Districts (less than 2,500 ADMr)• Greater of• Census Data (see Large Districts)• Portion of County’s Free and Reduced Lunch count
Current Data• Problems• Accuracy• Severity Changes
HB 2098• Rulemaking Authority• Maintains 0.25 Weight
HB 2098: Legislative Intent• Accurate Data• Generally accessible and accepted data• Use U.S. Census Bureau data
HB 2098: District Concerns• No additional data collections
HB 2098: ODE Goals• Transparency• Accuracy
What about Free and Reduced Lunch Data?• Different Definition• Known underreporting• Accuracy concerns
Small Area Income Poverty Estimate (SAIPE)• U.S. Census Bureau data• http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/
• Updated annually• District level data
SAIPE• Statistical Model• SNAP from U.S. Department of Agriculture• IRS Data• American Community Survey data
SAIPEData provided:• Population of district• Population age 5-17 in district• Population of age 5-17 in families in
poverty
Poverty Calculation• Start with SAIPE Data• Total Population age 5 to 17 in school
district
Poverty CalculationProblem:• Not all children attend public schools• Need accurate population in public
schools
Poverty CalculationSolution:• Use ADMr• Percentage of children attending public
school
Poverty Calculation• 2 Steps:
Poverty CalculationProblem:• Some ADMr to SAIPE 5 to 17 ratios will be
greater than 100%• Charter School enrollment• Inter-district transfers• Open Enrollment
Poverty CalculationSolution:• Cap ADMr to SAIPE 5 to 17 ration to 100%• District gets SAIPE maximum• Charter schools receive district percentage
Does this work?Salem Keizer:1. SAIPE population age 5 to 17 = 45,2692. ADMr = 37,999.073. SAIPE Poverty = 12,572
Does this work?Salem Keizer:• ADMr ÷ SAIPE • 37,999.07 ÷ 45,269 = 83.94%
• ADMr-SAIPE ratio × SAIPE Poverty• 83.94% × 12,572 = 10,553.01
• Change in weights = 904.66 increase
Does this work?• DHS and OHA published report on poverty
hotspots• Hotspot is a high concentration of family in
poverty
Does this work?• Data Used:• Oregon SNAP data• Oregon Employment Data• DHS client data
• Available at: http://www.oregon.gov/dhs/ofra/ofradocuments/High%20Poverty%20Hotspots%202013.pdf
Does this work?• SAIPE v. Free and Reduced Lunch
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
200,000
210,000
220,000
230,000
240,000
250,000
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
300,000
SAIPEFRLP
Data SetsTwo data sets:1. 2014-15 v 2014-15 Poverty Change2. 2012-13 v 2013-14 ADMw
Data SetsFirst Data Set• Compares change in poverty• Change in weights• Change in projected funding
Data SetsSecond Data Set• ADMw for 2012-13 compared to 2013-14 • Shows extended ADMw interaction with
poverty weights• Extended ADMw calculation
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #1: Redmond SD1. Poverty increased2. Total funding increased
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #1: Redmond SDPoverty increased
◦ Increase of 273.53 to 443.49Extended ADMw increased
◦Increase of 273.53 to 8,166.64Increase weights more than loss of $$/wt
◦Increase of $1,940,717◦$$/wt loss of $336,302
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #2: Bandon SD1. Poverty decreased2. Total funding decreased
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #2: Bandon SDPoverty decreased
◦ Decrease of 14.43 to 36.77Extended ADMw remained the sameIncrease weights less than loss of $/wt
◦Same weights◦$/wt loss of $38,602.69
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #3: Corvallis SD1. Poverty increased2. Total funding decreased
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #3: Corvallis SDPoverty increased
◦ Increase of 36.4 to 254.93Extended ADMw increased
◦Increase of 0.43 to 7,128.17Increase weights less than loss of $/wt
◦Increase of $3,049◦$/wt loss of $293,965
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #3: CorvallisBreakdown extended ADMw:1. Greater ADMw between 2013-14 and
2012-132. Charter school ADMw counted separate
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #3: CorvallisExtended ADMw
• Non-charter ADMw Difference: 160.20
School 2012-13 ADMw
2013-14 ADMw
Extended ADMw
Non-Charter 7,021.40 6,861.20 7,021.40Muddy Creek 97.03 106.35 106.35TOTAL 7,127.74
Data Set #1: 3 OutcomesOutcome #3: CorvallisExtended ADMw• 2013-14 ADMw has to increase by more
than 160.2 to affect funding level
Summary1. HB 2098: more accurate and up-to-date2. SAIPE: district level with annual updates3. Calculation: (ADMr/SAIPE Pop)* SAIPE
Poverty4. 3 outcomes5. Next Steps
QUESTIONS?