clinical validation webinar
DESCRIPTION
A webinar on the clinical validation of healthcare claims processing, and how Verisk Health is saving its partners millions annually.TRANSCRIPT
Take ACloser LookTop Coding Errors of 2013 (and How to Avoid Them In 2014)
1January 30, 2014
Presented By
Michelle Higginson MS, RN, RHIA, CPC
Director, Clinical Operations – Payment Accuracy Solutions
2
About Verisk Analytics
Publicly-Traded
Focus on The Science of Risk
Financial Services
Property & Casualty
We drive performance in the business of healthcare. By combining clinical and analytics expertise with advanced technology and services, we help payers, employers and providers solve complex problems with measurable results.
$10.2B Market Cap
15.7% Annual Growth 2009-2011
Supply Chain
Healthcare
3
Coding:An Overview
Coding and Modifiers
Code sets used for billing:
• Current Procedural Terminology – CPT
• Developed by the American Medical Association – AMA
• Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System – HCPCS
• Developed by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - CMS
Modifiers:
Explain to insurance carriers that the description of the code is the same, but something about the procedure or service was changed without changing the definition of the CPT code set.
• Some modifiers are informational and some impact reimbursement
• Modifiers can increase the likelihood of getting reimbursed accurately, but they do NOT ensure reimbursement.
How are Medical Services Coded?
When Max was a newborn, he developed high bilirubin levels (or jaundice) and lost weight due to poor feeding.
At his 8 week checkup, Max’s mother mentioned that there seemed to be an issue with the umbilical cord and a possible infection.
How are Medical Services Coded?
The physician performed the following services:
• Periodic comprehensive preventive medicine
• Bilirubin Total, laboratory
• Ultrasound, abdominal, real time with image documentation; limited
How is this Claim Reimbursed?
LineCPT/
HCPCSModifier
199391 Preventive
Medicine Evaluation & Management, Infant
V20.2 Routine Infant Health Check Pay
299214 Outpatient
Office Visit25
774.30 Neonatal Jaundice779.31 Feeding Problem in Newborn
753.7 Anomaly of Urachus
Pay based on clinical review of modifier 25 criteria
3 36415 Venipuncture 774.30 Neonatal Jaundice
Pay (depending on payer, some state Medicaid rules
consider venipuncture bundled to other services)
482247
Total Bilirubin774.30 Neonatal Jaundice Pay
576705
Limited Abdominal Ultrasound
753.7 Anomaly of Urachus Pay
Diagnosis Codes
V20.2 Routine Infant Health Check Pay
774.30 Neonatal Jaundice779.31 Feeding Problem in Newborn
753.7 Anomaly of Urachus
Pay based on clinical review of modifier 25 criteria
774.30 Neonatal Jaundice
Pay (depending on payer, some state Medicaid rules
consider venipuncture bundled to other services)
774.30 Neonatal Jaundice Pay
753.7 Anomaly of Urachus Pay
Action
Pay
Pay based on clinical review of modifier 25 criteria
Pay (depending on payer, some state Medicaid rules
consider venipuncture bundled to other services)
Pay
Pay
The Problem
Potential Losses
Potential Annual Losses Due to Claim Waste and Abuse
$210 Billion
Correct Coding
The detection and prevention of wasteful or abusive claims.
Erroneous and abusive billing types include:
• Duplicate billing• Split billing• Unbundling• Up-coding
11
Healthcare
The Answer
Clinical Validation
Healthcare
13
The experts behind our human touch include nurses, physicians and coding specialists. A unique process to Verisk Health, this process delivers
unmatched payment accuracy and virtually eliminates overpayments.
Improve auto-adjudication rates
Decrease frequency of false-positives
Create transparency with and support for providers
Our Clinical Coding Experts
Extensive additional coding training Representing experience in virtually every area of nursing
Registered Nurses60+
Certified Professional Coders40+
Reviewed in 2013:
Claims4M
Appeals250K
Our Process
15
Claims Exported to VH Claims Processed
Releasedfor Payment
Claims Exported To Client System
Cleared
Clinical Review
Cleared
Validated & Posted to aSecure Website
Flagged
Releasedfor Payment
TheResults
59
Most Commonly Abused Modifiers: 25 & 59
Modifier 25: A Significant, Separately Identifiable Evaluation and Management Service by the Same Physician on the Same Day of a Procedure or Other Service.
Modifier 59: A Distinct Procedural Service.
25
Evaluation & Management with Injections
25
Modifier 25
Coding error rate for $6 million in client savings.26%
For top 50 coding errors related to modifier 25 on established patient office visits 99212-99215:
of this savings is for claim lines where 99212-99215 was billed with a therapeutic injection, 96372. $2Mof the savings is for claim lines where 99212-99215 was billed with a joint injection, 20610. $1M
Unbundling – Modifier 25Example: Evaluation and Management Services with Therapeutic Injections
LineCPT/
HCPCSModifier
1 99213 Office visit
25281.0 Pernicious Anemia
780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue782.0 Disturbance of Skin Sensation
Pay - diagnoses and other services reported support separate and
significant E/M service was provided in addition to the B12 injection.
296372
Therapeutic Injection
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
3J3420
Vitamin B12 Injection
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
436415 Routine
Venipuncture
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
Diagnosis Codes
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue782.0 Disturbance of Skin Sensation
Pay - diagnoses and other services reported support separate and
significant E/M service was provided in addition to the B12 injection.
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
281.0 Pernicious Anemia780.79 OT Malaise/Fatigue
Action
Pay - diagnoses and other services reported support separate and significant E/M service was provided in addition to the B12 injection.
Unbundling – Modifier 25Evaluation and Management Services with Joint Injection 20610
LineCPT/
HCPCSModifier
1 99213 Office Visit
25 1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014 Pay
220610
Drain/Inject Joint Bursa
RT 1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg 1/08/2014
3J1030
Methylprednisolone 40 mg
1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014
473562
X-Ray Exam of Knee
RT 1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014
Date of Service
1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014 Pay
1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg 1/08/2014
1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014
1/08/2014715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized
Primary Involving Lower Leg1/08/2014
Diagnosis Codes
715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized Primary Involving Lower Leg
715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized Primary Involving Lower Leg
715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized Primary Involving Lower Leg
715.16 Osteoarthritis Localized Primary Involving Lower Leg
First Date of Diagnosis
1/08/2014
1/08/2014
1/08/2014
1/08/2014
Action
Pay
Upcoding - Hydration
For unbundling scenarios involving just the add-on hydration code 96361, we found:
Reported incorrectly, or with no support for hydration88%In ClientSavings$1.8MClient Acceptance RateOf our Recommendations93%
LineCPT/
HCPCSUnits
196360
Hydration, initial
1
296361
Hydration, add-on
3
399283
Emergency Dept. Visit
1
4 93005 EKG
1
UpcodingExample: Hydration – Not Supported
Diagnosis Codes
786.59 Other Chest Pain311 Depressive Disorder OT530.81 Esophageal Reflux
401.9 Hypertension Unspecified
786.59 Other Chest Pain311 Depressive Disorder OT530.81 Esophageal Reflux
401.9 Hypertension Unspecified
786.59 Other Chest Pain311 Depressive Disorder OT530.81 Esophageal Reflux
401.9 Hypertension Unspecified
786.59 Other Chest Pain401.9 Hypertension Unspecified
Action
Deny, not
supported
Deny, not
Supported
Cost of Coding Errors
If we look at only the errors related to Modifiers 25 and 59:
For the top 100 coding errors by $$ impact, we see a 36% error rate.
Acceptance Rate98%
In Client Savings$9M
Acceptance Rate87%
In Client Savings$21M
For the top 100 coding errors by line count, we see a 24% error rate.