Slide 1

Slide 2

Clinical Therapist Life Coach Adjunct Professor, Grand Canyon University PhD Student Regent University Counselor Education and Supervision

Slide 3

Slide 4

Developed in the 1950 1960s Foundational Premise Individuals can best be understood within the context of their environments Influences Cybernetics General Systems Theory

Slide 5

Family systems theory speaks about the individual members of the family, and describes both the inter- relationships between and among members of the family, and the rules that exist to maintain the family in its current functioning.

Slide 6

Systems & Subsystems Structure, Roles & Rules Hierarchy - generational Power Boundaries Feedback loops Homeostasis

Slide 7

VVirginia Satir (1916 1988) Mother of Family Therapy CCommunication / Strategic Family Therapy CConjoint Family Therapy (The Satir Model)

Slide 8

KEY CONCEPTSKEY TERMS & TECHNIQUES Communication the key to understanding human behavior Pathology is an interactional process between family members Function of pathology is homeostatic maintenance Therapy focuses on change in communication patterns between individual family members Double Bind Communication Punctuation Symmetrical / complementary communication Schism Reframing Prescribing the symptom Reduction ad absurdum Therapeutic double binds Straight / Paradoxical directives

Slide 9

Murray Bowen (1913 1990) Psychiatrist Georgetown University Bowenian Family Therapy Bowenian Family Therapy

Slide 10

KEY CONCEPTSKEY TERMS Pathology stems from inadequate differentiation of self from family of origins emotional system Severe pathology such as schizophrenia is the result of a multigenerational transmission process Goal of therapy is to increase differentiation of self Therapists role is to model differentiated self rather than become caught in family triangles Differentiation of self Fusion Undifferentiated family ego mass Triangulation Emotional cut-off Family projection process Multi-generational transmission process Responding from a responsible I position rather than we or you

Slide 11

Salvador Minuchin (1921 - ) Salvador Minuchin (1921 - ) San Salvador, Entre Rios, Argentina Russian-Jewish Heritage Psychiatrist trained in individual psychotherapies Theory developed within the context of the Civil Rights Era Power families have over psychopathology

Slide 12

Treatment occurs best within the social and relational contexts of the family, rather than the individual Delinquency Anorexia Nervosa - Medical Focus on the here and now rather than the past Psychological distress caused and maintained by relationships Family belief structure cognitive schema

Slide 13

Slide 14

Boundary Continuum DisengagedNormal Enmeshed Family Structure Family Structure Family Structure Rigid Clear Diffuse Isolation, Disengagement, limited Frequent Communication, Encroachment on personal and access between subsystems, weak interdependent, supportive, healthy system boundaries, loss of family connections, system closed healthy autonomy, system open to change, autonomy, system resistant to to change, inflexible organization open to change, flexible organization, adaptable change, enmeshment, poor to external change, belonging but separateness differentiation of self Depression, psychosomatic complaints, antisocial symptoms Incest

Slide 15

Slide 16

Active and Directive Aware of structure and rules Focused on the here and now Problem reframer Individualistic ideology vs systemic perspective Focus is on the individual within the system To interpret role of symptoms

Slide 17

Joining Ongoing process of entering a family system to engage & influence its members Enactment Process of changing patterns of interaction in the here and now Blocking of unhealthy interactional patterns Restructuring Activities that attempt to change family rules Accommodation Process of adjusting to and accommodating the rules of the system. Changing family myths Challenging family belief systems Coaching new communication patterns

Slide 18

General considerations Therapists interest in the culture Impacts joining Family observation

Slide 19

Specific Populations Chinese and Hispanic families Highly structured boundaries and roles Emphasis on social context Chinese American cultural disconnects

Slide 20

Cultural assessment tools for Therapists Cultural Auditing through Reflective Practice What are my initial reactions to this family and what does it tell me about my beliefs, values and assumptions? In what ways do I assume that we are similar or different because of our cultural backgrounds? What are my initial hypotheses about the impact of culture on this familys presenting concerns? How sure am I of the accuracy of my hypotheses? How open am I to being wrong, considering new information, and modifying my assumptions?

Slide 21

SFT initially failed to address issues of power within same generation relationships Abuse of power Some disregard the possible positive function of symptomatic behavior within the family only sees it as perpetuating problems in family functioning Many focus on family as a collective disregards need for individuation

Slide 22

General similarities emphasis on family as essential for individual growth and development Bowenian Family Therapy most akin Emphasis on clearly defined family hierarchies parent-child relationships (Exodus 20:12; Deuteronomy 21:18; Proverbs 22:6; Proverbs 29:17), family responsibility (1 Timothy 3:1, 4-5; 5:8), good communication (Ephesians 6:4; Colossians 3:21) marriage like union of Christ and the church (Ephesians 5:25-30).

Slide 23

Modern Primary use of techniques like those used in structural therapy Belief in therapists knowledge, expertise and power to influence change Post Modern Social constructionist view with focus on relational, narrative paradigm Therapist takes not knowing stance Use of language and conversation to elicit clients expertise and story

Slide 24

The Para-Modern Stance A both/and approach to family therapy Dual positioning allows for more effective treatment What is most relevant is what works in practice rather than adherence to a theoretical position such as systemic theories or social construction theory. An ethical stance allows family therapists to access a range of therapeutic languages and techniques at once. The priority is not what knowledge we use but how we use itputting theory to work in the service of others. (Larner, 2009, p. 54) Concerns Dearth of evidence-based research documenting effectiveness Does ethical utilization of theories allow for mixing and matching in the name of integrative practice? Recent documentation of effectiveness with adolescent depression and eating disorders

Slide 25

Conclusion

Slide 26

Teaching Activities Family Therapy with Single Parents Whos Afraid of Virginia Wolfe?

Slide 27

American Counseling Association. (2005). American Counseling Association Code of Ethics, Alexandria, VA. Banmen, J. (1986, December 1). Virginia Satir's family therapy model. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research and Practice, 42(4), 480-493. Banmen, J. (2002, March). The Satir model: Yesterday and today. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), 7-22. Banmen, J. (2009). Satir model developmental phases. The Satir Journal, 30(1), 14-19. Banmen, J. (2010). Forgiveness as therapy in the Satir model. The Satir Journal, 42(1), 6-23. Beels, C. (2011, March). Family process 1962 - 1969. Family Process, 50(1), 4-11. doi:10.1111/j.1545- 5300.2010.01342.x Campbell, J., & Handy, J. (2011). Bound to care: Custodial grandmothers' experiences of double blind family relationships. Feminism and Psychology, 21(3), 431-439. Collins, S., Arthur, N., & Wong-Wylie, G. (2010, Summer). Enhancing reflective practice in multicultural counseling through cultural auditing. Journal of Counseling and Development, 88(3), 340 - 347. DSM-IV-TR. (2000). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. Jones, S. L., & Butman, R. E. (1991). A comprehensive Christian appraisal: Modern psychotherapies. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press Academic.

Slide 28

Jung, M. (1984). Structural family therapy: Its application to Chinese families. Family Process, 23, 365-374. Larner, G. (2009). Integrative family therapy with childhood chronic illness: An ethics of practice. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 30(1), 51-65. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University press. Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B., Rossman, B., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums: An exploration of their structure and treatment. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Muir, J. A., Schwartz, S. J., & Szapocznik, J. (2004, July). A program of research with Hispanic and African American families: Three decades of intervention development and testing influenced by the changing cultural context of Miami. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(3), 285 - 303. Napoliello, A. L., & Sweet, E. S. (1992). Salvador Minuchin's structural family therapy and its application to Native Americans. Family Therapy, 19(2), 155-165. Navarre, S. E. (1998). Salvador Minuchins structural family therapy and its application to multicultural family systems. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 19(6), 557-570. doi:10.1080/016128498248845 Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2010). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. Vetere, A. (2001). Therapy matters: Structural family therapy. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 6(3), 133-139.