climate versus the economy: what's the right trade-off?

31
Bruce M. Everett The Fletcher School October 16, 2008 Climate Versus the Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off? Right Trade-off?

Upload: ouida

Post on 14-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?. Bruce M. Everett The Fletcher School October 16, 2008. The climate change argument has two components. How well do we understand the issue?. How hard is it to reduce global carbon emissions?. A simple test of scientific knowledge. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Bruce M. EverettThe Fletcher School

October 16, 2008

Climate Versus the Economy: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?What's the Right Trade-off?

Page 2: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

The climate change argument has two components

Page 3: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

How well do we understand the

issue?

Page 4: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

How hard is it to reduce global carbon emissions?

Page 5: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Drop a golf ball from a height of1 meter. Specify location, air pressure, humidity, wind and rotation.

Ask 100 scientists how long it will take the ball to hit the floor.

Their answers would be identical: 0.45 seconds.

Falsifiable experiments tell us that standard gravity is 9.80665 m/sec2.

Science = quantification

A simple test of scientific knowledgeA simple test of scientific knowledge

Page 6: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

The UN Intergovernmental PanelThe UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)on Climate Change (IPCC)

•Won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize

•Done an excellent literature review

•But do they agree on climate science?

Page 7: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Glo

bal

Su

rfac

e W

arm

ing

(ºC

)IPCC Scenario A1BIPCC Scenario A1B

Scenario specifies: - Population - GDP - Energy demand - Energy supply by fuel - Technology

Page 8: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Glo

bal

Su

rfac

e W

arm

ing

(ºC

)IPCC Scenario A1BIPCC Scenario A1B

Lowest model run(+1.7° C)

Scenario specifies: - Population - GDP - Energy demand - Energy supply by fuel - Technology

Page 9: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Glo

bal

Su

rfac

e W

arm

ing

(ºC

)IPCC Scenario A1BIPCC Scenario A1B

Lowest model run(+1.7° C)

Scenario specifies: - Population - GDP - Energy demand - Energy supply by fuel - Technology

Highest model run(+4.4° C)

Page 10: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Glo

bal

Su

rfac

e W

arm

ing

(ºC

)IPCC Scenario A1BIPCC Scenario A1B

“Consensus”(+2.8° C)

Lowest model run(+1.7° C)

Averaging inconsistent results is an opinion, not science.

Stop agreeing and start arguing!

Highest model run(+4.4° C)

Page 11: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

With all due respect to Al Gore, the scientific debate about climate

change is not over.

Page 12: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

How difficult is it to reduce global carbon emissions?

Page 13: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Bill

ion

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r ye

ar

Other OECD

FSU/EE

Source: EIA

China

Other devel

Projected global COProjected global CO22 emissions emissions

US

Page 14: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

No government has indicated any willingness to sacrifice economic growth for carbon reduction.

Page 15: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

International cooperation is a MYTHInternational cooperation is a MYTH

The Kyoto Protocol creates five groups:

1. Developing countries with rights but no obligations.

2. Russia/Eastern Europe, whose post-1990 economic collapse is treated as energy efficiency.

3. Germany/UK, who had met their targets before they signed the treaty.

4. The rest of the EU, Japan, Canada and Australia who have targets but won’t meet them.

5. The US, which sensibly declined to participate.

Page 16: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Bill

ion

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r ye

ar

Other OECD

FSU/EE

Source: EIA

China

Other devel +20%

If US emissions in 2030 were zero, global emissions would still be 20% above 2005.

Page 17: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

What steps should the US take to reduce carbon emissions?

Page 18: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

2005 carbon emissions = 6,000 MMt

Page 19: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

2008 auto standards

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 20: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Green Office Buildings

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 21: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

+20 nuclear plants

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 22: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

15% renewable standard

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 23: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Fluorescent light bulbs

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 24: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

10-fold increase in public transportation

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 25: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Replace all refrigerators

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 26: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

20 million new solar roofs

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 27: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Reduce driving by 30 miles per month

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 28: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Projected increasein US by 2030

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 29: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Mil

lio

n m

etri

c to

ns

per

yea

r o

f C

O2

6,000

Projected increasein China by 2030.

Steps to reduce US carbon emissionsSteps to reduce US carbon emissions

Page 30: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

Both Presidential candidates agree…Both Presidential candidates agree…

• Frighten the public with scary scenarios.

• Take immediate actions which have:­ High profile­ Low-cost­ Negligible impact.

• Promise strong action in the distant future.

• Participate in unproductive international negotiations.

• Congratulate themselves on their vision.

• Hope the public buys it.

Page 31: Climate Versus the Economy: What's the Right Trade-off?

What we should doWhat we should do

1. Study climate change and portray the results honestly.

2. Acknowledge the high cost of reducing CO2.

3. Look at a 100-year, not a 30-year horizon.

4. Make meaningful promises and keep them.

5. Privatize and deregulate electric power.

6. Remove constraints on natural gas.• Find new domestic supplies• Facilitate international trade

7. Revive the civilian nuclear power industry.

8. Encourage private sector research.