climate shifts within major agricultural seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and...

54
1 Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 and +2.0 °C Worlds: 1 HAPPI Projections and AgMIP Modeling Scenarios 2 3 Alex C. Ruane 1 4 Meridel M. Phillips 2,1 5 Cynthia Rosenzweig 1 6 7 1 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA 8 2 Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, NY, USA 9 10 Original submission: October 31 st , 2017 11 Revised submission: April 22 nd , 2018 12 Accepted at Agricultural and Forest Meteorology: May 12 th , 2018 13 14 Corresponding Author: 15 Alex Ruane 16 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 17 2880 Broadway 18 New York, NY 10025 19 [email protected] 20 21 22 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180007597 2020-05-31T10:08:45+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 28-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

1

Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 and +2.0 °C Worlds: 1

HAPPI Projections and AgMIP Modeling Scenarios 2 3

Alex C. Ruane1 4

Meridel M. Phillips2,1 5

Cynthia Rosenzweig1 6

7 1NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA 8

2Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, NY, USA 9

10

Original submission: October 31st, 2017 11

Revised submission: April 22nd, 2018 12

Accepted at Agricultural and Forest Meteorology: May 12th, 2018 13

14

Corresponding Author: 15

Alex Ruane 16

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 17

2880 Broadway 18

New York, NY 10025 19

[email protected] 20

21

22

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180007597 2020-05-31T10:08:45+00:00Z

Page 2: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

2

Abstract: This study compares climate changes in major agricultural regions and current 23

agricultural seasons associated with global warming of +1.5 or +2.0 ºC above pre-industrial 24

conditions. It describes the generation of climate scenarios for agricultural modeling 25

applications conducted as part of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and 26

Improvement Project (AgMIP) Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments. Climate 27

scenarios from the Half a degree Additional warming, Projections, Prognosis and Impacts 28

project (HAPPI) are largely consistent with transient scenarios extracted from RCP4.5 29

simulations of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5). Focusing on 30

food and agricultural systems and top-producing breadbaskets in particular, we distinguish 31

maize, rice, wheat, and soy season changes from global annual mean climate changes. 32

Many agricultural regions warm at a rate that is faster than the global mean surface 33

temperature (including oceans) but slower than the mean land surface temperature, leading 34

to regional warming that exceeds 0.5 ºC between the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds. Agricultural 35

growing seasons warm at a pace slightly behind the annual temperature trends in most 36

regions, while precipitation increases slightly ahead of the annual rate. Rice cultivation 37

regions show reduced warming as they are concentrated where monsoon rainfall is 38

projected to intensify, although projections are influenced by Asian aerosol loading in 39

climate mitigation scenarios. Compared to CMIP5, HAPPI slightly underestimates the 40

CO2 concentration that corresponds to the +1.5 ºC World but overestimates the CO2 41

concentration for the +2.0 ºC World, which means that HAPPI scenarios may also lead to 42

an overestimate in the beneficial effects of CO2 on crops in the +2.0 ºC World. HAPPI 43

enables detailed analysis of the shifting distribution of extreme growing season 44

temperatures and precipitation, highlighting widespread increases in extreme heat seasons 45

Page 3: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

3

and heightened skewness toward hot seasons in the tropics. Shifts in the probability of 46

extreme drought seasons generally tracked median precipitation changes; however, some 47

regions skewed toward drought conditions even where median precipitation changes were 48

small. Together, these findings highlight unique seasonal and agricultural region changes 49

in the +1.5°C and +2.0°C worlds for adaptation planning in these climate stabilization 50

targets. 51

52

53

Page 4: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

4

1. Introduction 54

Changes in the Earth’s climate present an array of challenging consequences for 55

humankind in the coming decades (IPCC, 2013). Food systems, in particular, are at risk 56

from rising temperatures, droughts, floods, and extreme events (Beddington et al., 2012; 57

Porter et al., 2014; Brown et al., 2015; FAO, 2016). In light of observed and projected 58

impacts, representatives of 196 countries signed the United Nations Framework 59

Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2016) in 60

December 2015, agreeing to pursue efforts that would limit the global mean surface 61

temperature increase to 2°C above pre-industrial temperature levels, with ambition to limit 62

the rise below +1.5°C (both would require substantial deviation from the current business-63

as-usual greenhouse gas emission pathway). These commitments do not eliminate 64

anthropogenic climate change or the need to sustainably adapt natural and human systems, 65

but seek to diminish the risk of increasingly dangerous impacts associated with more 66

extreme climate changes (IPCC, 2014). 67

68

The Paris Agreement is largely focused on major policy and technological issues related to 69

how climate change may be mitigated, but has also given rise to the scientific question: 70

What type of world would be achieved should efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions 71

and land use change be successful at keeping the world at either +1.5 ºC or +2.0 ºC above 72

pre-industrial temperature levels? Answers to this question are aided by the creation and 73

analysis of hypothetical climate states stabilized at +1.5 ºC and +2.0 ºC above pre-industrial 74

conditions, hereafter referred to as the ‘+1.5 ºC World’ and ‘+2.0 ºC World’. These 75

projections allow us to compare future and current conditions and evaluate potentially 76

Page 5: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

5

beneficial or detrimental climate impacts across regions, sectors, and populations. These 77

impacts, the resulting need for adaptation, and pressure on current land use patterns must 78

be considered along with the costs of mitigation in determining future societal pathways 79

and climate targets. 80

81

Here we describe likely challenges for the agricultural sector under +1.5 and +2.0 ºC 82

Worlds, identifying key characteristics of projected changes for current growing seasons 83

in major breadbaskets. Agro-climatic indicators may contribute to more efficient 84

adaptation interventions in the agricultural sector, potentially including shifts in planting 85

date, seed varieties, irrigation applications, crop insurance, farm systems, food value 86

chains, and the management of pests, diseases, and weeds (Howden et al., 2007; 87

Rosenzweig and Tubiello, 2007; Yadav et al., 2011; Rickards and Howden, 2012). 88

89

The agro-climatic projections serve as the driving conditions for agricultural model 90

analyses utilizing protocols developed within the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and 91

Improvement Project (AgMIP; Rosenzweig et al., 2013; 2015; Ruane et al., 2017). 92

AgMIP’s Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments (CGRA) utilize a simulation 93

framework linking biophysical and economic impacts on global and local scales to 94

consistently evaluate the impacts of climate, socioeconomic development, and policy 95

scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 96

of the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds are thus grounded in climate scenarios with consistent 97

methodologies and assumptions, allowing CGRA findings to focus on emergent cross-98

disciplinary and cross-scale findings. 99

Page 6: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

6

100

101

2. Methodology 102

The targets of +1.5 and +2.0 ºC global warming, here defined as global increase in average 103

near-surface air temperature above pre-industrial conditions, are dependent on the selection 104

of a pre-industrial period that was not explicitly delineated by the UNFCCC. A number of 105

pre-industrial period definitions have been utilized in prior Intergovernmental Panel on 106

Climate Change (IPCC) assessments (IPCC, 2013, 2014; Clarke et al., 2014), some 107

pegging it to the early industrial period starting in 1760 or more often connecting it to the 108

1850-1900 period (which is also the beginning of historical period climate simulations; 109

Taylor et al., 2012). Historical station-based temperature datasets are available beginning 110

in 1850 (Hadley Center Climate Research Unit Temperature, HadCRUT4, Morice et al., 111

2012; Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature, BEST, Rohde et al., 2013), with additional 112

datasets available by the 1880-1900 period (Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface 113

Temperature, GISTEMP Team, 2017; Hansen et al., 2010; the National Oceanic and 114

Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, Smith et al., 2008). The climate between 1760 and 115

1900 has relatively small long-term trends, characterized by internal variability and 116

punctuated by brief cooling events caused by aerosol loading from several major volcanic 117

eruptions (Hartmann et al., 2013). We define a pre-industrial period in the next sub-118

section, which allows us to determine the relative global changes between current 119

conditions and the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds. 120

121

Page 7: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

7

From a climate perspective it is theoretically not necessary to specify the exact year for the 122

hypothetical +1.5 or +2.0 ºC Worlds as we define this period to be in a steady state. 123

However, the selection of a stabilization year is affected by long-term trends in land use, 124

ozone hole recovery, and aerosol concentrations, which alter the carbon and radiation 125

balances needed to stabilize climate conditions (Mitchell et al., 2017). The stabilization 126

target year also has large implications beyond climate conditions themselves, owing to 127

transient (time-evolving) pathways for socioeconomic development (O’Neill et al., 2014), 128

greenhouse gas concentration emissions (Moss et al., 2010), climate policy (Kriegler et al., 129

2014), and technological and policy developments affecting a sector like agriculture (Antle 130

et al., 2015; Ruane et al., 2018). Here we concentrate on stabilized climates rather than the 131

temporal progressions (e.g., peak and overshoot, linear, or asymptotic approaches) that 132

could achieve this state. 133

134

Representing the stabilized end climate states for the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds is a 135

challenge given that climate model simulations are typically driven by sets of greenhouse 136

gas emissions and socioeconomic development pathways that result in evolving trajectories 137

of climate changes extending from the present into the future (SRES, 2000; Moss et al., 138

2010; Taylor et al., 2012; Eyring et al., 2016). Given that the Coupled Model 139

Intercomparison Project (CMIP) is currently between its 5th and 6th phases (Taylor et al., 140

2012; Eyring et al., 2016), investigations of +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds require either new 141

simulations performed outside of the CMIP protocols or the extraction of a representative 142

warming signal from existing CMIP5 simulations. 143

144

Page 8: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

8

2.1. HAPPI stabilization scenarios of +1.5 and +2.0 ºC global warming 145

The primary source of climate information examined in this study are projections from the 146

Half a degree Additional warming, Projections, Prognosis and Impacts project (HAPPI; 147

Mitchell et al., 2017). HAPPI is designed to compare current climate (defined as the 2006-148

2015 period) with stabilization scenarios for the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds (nominally run 149

for the 2106-2115 period). HAPPI’s rapid mobilization of the climate modeling 150

community enables an ensemble of simulations focused on the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds, 151

providing updated models, specified scenarios, and enhanced focus on extreme events in 152

these projections of relatively low global temperature changes. Key attributes of the 153

HAPPI Tier 1 experiments are presented in Table 1, with further information in Table 1 of 154

the supplementary material and enhanced detail provided by Mitchell et al. (2017). 155

156

Table 2 shows the GCMs that provided HAPPI experiment output analyzed in this study 157

according to two analysis approaches. First, aggregate statistics were calculated to 158

represent the full GCM ensemble’s changes in monthly mean maximum and minimum 159

temperatures, total precipitation, the number of rainy days, and the standard deviation of 160

daily maximum and minimum temperatures for each grid cell. These were then re-gridded 161

to a common ½º x ½º grid. Climate changes based on the aggregate statistics were then 162

imposed on observational data using a quantile-mapping approach to produce bias-163

corrected future driving conditions (Ruane et al., 2015a,b), which we applied to point-164

based simulations and gridded analyses (Ruane et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018). Second, daily 165

outputs were bias-corrected to the same grid using a quantile-mapping method to match 166

observational statistics in order to capture shifts in inter-annual and intra-seasonal extremes 167

Page 9: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

9

while maintaining long-term trends (Hempel et al., 2013; Schleussner et al., 2018). Daily 168

scenarios have been applied to West African analyses (Webber et al., 2018) and a global 169

examination of agricultural extreme events (Schleussner et al., 2018). Both scenario 170

generation approaches capture mean climate changes and represent shifts in the distribution 171

of extreme events. Further dynamical and statistical downscaling approaches, which could 172

have provided additional detail on shifts in the characteristics of extreme events, were not 173

available for this rapid assessment. 174

175

2.2. Application of the 1980-2009 recent observed climatology 176

Many existing AgMIP model analyses and projection frameworks participating in the 177

AgMIP CGRA use the 1980-2009 period for crop model calibration (‘1995 climate’; as 178

provided by the Agricultural Modeling version of the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis 179

for Research and Applications, AgMERRA; Ruane et al., 2015a). To enable the use of 180

these resources in agricultural assessments of the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds, we extend 181

HAPPI simulations to estimate differences between the 1995 climate and HAPPI 182

simulations of its current climate (2006-2015; ‘2010 climate’) and the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC 183

Worlds. HAPPI simulations directly provide the difference between the 2010 climate and 184

the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds. However, representing the remaining difference between the 185

1995 and 2010 climates is a challenge as we cannot observe a similar 30-year climatology 186

centered on 2010 and HAPPI simulations do not include 1995. 187

188

We employ a simple pattern-scaling approach to estimate how a climatological variable Q 189

(e.g., maximum daily temperatures, precipitation, the number of rainy days, the standard 190

Page 10: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

10

deviation of minimum temperatures) changes between 2010 and 1995 at any given 191

longitude (i) and latitude (j) from the ½ º x ½ º global grid: 192

193

∆𝑄𝑖,𝑗,[2010−1995] = ∆𝑄𝑖,𝑗,[1.5−2010]

∆𝑇𝐺𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙,[1.5−2010]× ∆𝑇𝐺𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙,[2010−1995] (Eqn 1) 194

195

The ratio in Eqn 1 represents the rate of local change in Q in response to a change in global 196

temperature, a pattern that may then be multiplied by any similar global temperature 197

change. This is generated by calculating the local change in Q between the HAPPI 198

ensemble average +1.5 ºC World and current period simulation (2010 climate) and then 199

dividing by the additional global temperature changes expected in the +1.5 ºC World 200

simulation (0.58 ºC). This scaling factor is then multiplied by the observed warming 201

between 1995 and 2010 (ΔTGlobal,[2010-1995] = 0.25 ºC) drawn from the ensemble of historical 202

temperature products (BEST, GISS, HadCRUT4, and NOAA; note that these observations 203

indicate that the 2010 climate is 0.92 ºC warmer than pre-industrial conditions). This 204

results in an estimate of the local offset for the 1995-2010 period, with the process repeated 205

for each month. The same offset is used to calculate climate shifts associated with both 206

the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds so that their differences are determined solely by HAPPI 207

simulations. More complex pattern scaling approaches were not feasible given temporal 208

constraints related to stakeholder interest in the +1.5 ºC and +2.0 ºC Worlds (Tebaldi and 209

Arblaster, 2014). While this approach likely contributed to local biases (Lopez et al., 210

2014), patterns for HAPPI models were largely consistent when compared against patterns 211

derived from the +2.0 ºC World for all but the MIROC5 GCM, which showed polar 212

Page 11: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

11

regions accounting for an increasing proportion of global temperature rise at the expense 213

of other land areas (not shown). 214

215

2.3. CMIP5 transient scenarios of +1.5 and +2.0 ºC global warming 216

Alternative representations of the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds are derived from CMIP5 217

transient simulations whereby climate evolves from anthropogenic and natural influences 218

over the historical period (1850-2005) and future decades (RCPs covering 2006-2100; 219

Moss et al., 2010). As our interest is in understanding the challenges today’s agricultural 220

sector will face from future climate change, we utilize the recent observable 1980-2009 221

climatology (1995 climate) used in many AgMIP analyses for each GCM (drawing from 222

RCP4.5 for 2006-2009). Note that this period had already warmed 0.67 ºC above the 1861-223

1880 pre-industrial period according to the observational products ensemble. For each 224

GCM, +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds are thus defined by their transient thresholds, or the period 225

in which global mean surface temperatures in the transient simulation reach 0.83 ºC and 226

1.33 ºC, respectively, above this 1995 climate. 227

228

We calculate corresponding threshold years for each GCM and RCP, then construct a 229

centered 30-year average climatology (to elevate the mean climate changes above internal 230

variability; WMO, 1989) for comparison to the current period. Threshold years differ by 231

GCM (depending on transient climate sensitivity) and among RCPs, with earlier thresholds 232

reflecting higher climate sensitivity in some GCMs or the accelerated accumulation of 233

greenhouse gases in RCP8.5 compared to RCP2.6. As many of the RCP2.6 simulations do 234

not reach the +2.0 ºC threshold, we focus on the ensemble response of 31 RCP4.5 GCMs 235

Page 12: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

12

in Table 2 given that GCM differences in regional patterns of temperature and precipitation 236

change tend to be robust across RCP and time horizon in the 21st century (Ruane and 237

McDermid, 2017). 238

239

Differences in climate change projections between the transient threshold and the same 240

GCM at stabilization merit further study, with differences relating to aerosol and land-use 241

patterns within the transient RCPs as well as a lag between radiative imbalances and 242

equilibration within the climate system. For this study we assume that this effect is small 243

compared to differences between the GCMs captured in the CMIP5 ensemble. Model 244

versions (among models that contributed to both CMIP5 and HAPPI) likely also contribute 245

to differences between transient and stabilization scenarios, as HAPPI simulations (which 246

were conducted largely in 2016 and 2017) used updated versions compared to CMIP5 247

simulations completed before 2013. 248

249

Rising CO2 concentrations are the largest radiative forcing factor contributing to 250

anthropogenic climate change (IPCC, 2013). The direct impact of CO2 on photosynthesis 251

merits additional focus for agricultural impacts. CO2 concentrations in the CMIP5 252

transients were above HAPPI’s recommended 423ppm at the +1.5 ºC crossing point, but 253

below HAPPI’s 487ppm at the +2.0 ºC crossing point (Figure S1). These results suggest 254

that the change in CO2 concentration and its impacts on agricultural systems are likely 255

overestimated in HAPPI-driven +2.0 ºC analyses (Boote et al., 2010; O’Leary et al., 2015; 256

Kimball, 2016; Deryng et al., 2016). Radiative disequilibrium at transient crossing points 257

also likely overestimates stabilization CO2 concentrations. For example, van Vuuren et al. 258

Page 13: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

13

(2015) indicated that CO2 concentrations must be kept below 450ppm to have a 67% 259

probability of keeping global temperature rise below +2.0 ºC. 260

261

2.4. Regional growing seasons 262

HAPPI and CMIP5 transient projections were distributed onto a ½º x ½º grid using a 263

nearest-neighbor approach in order to facilitate ensemble statistics and agro-climatic 264

analyses. Growing seasons (Julian day ranges) for each grid cell were drawn from the 265

AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison and were assumed to remain constant 266

in current and future worlds (Elliott et al., 2015). Each grid cell’s growing season aims to 267

represent the practice of the majority of farming systems even though many regions include 268

a wide diversity in sowing dates. Static (~2005) cropped areas from the Spatial Production 269

Allocation Model database (SPAM) provide the basis for weighted spatial averages of 270

agro-climatic changes associated with the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds (You et al., 2014). They 271

also form the basis of agricultural area masks to focus figures on grid cells with >10ha 272

rainfed crop area. 273

274

Here we highlight rainfed seasons as they are vulnerable to both temperature and 275

precipitation change impacts. Irrigated systems will face similar temperature challenges 276

but are largely unaffected by precipitation changes other than through supply of managed 277

water resources. Wheat growing seasons include both spring and winter wheat systems – 278

in regions where both are grown we examine only the system with higher mean production 279

in the AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) historical period 280

simulations (Müller et al., 2017). For winter wheat we examine climate changes during 281

Page 14: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

14

the final 90 days before average maturity to avoid the dormant vernalization period that 282

follows early planting. Wheat tends to be grown earlier in the season than maize, rice, and 283

soy, which are most often grown in the local spring and summer (Figure S2). 284

285

Comparison of climate shifts during the local growing season (ΔTGS and ΔPGS) against the 286

annual climate changes (ΔTAnn and ΔPAnn) helps us identify regions where agricultural 287

challenges are projected to be different than the annual signal suggests. We first look for 288

large magnitudes of difference across multiple models, classifying local growing season 289

changes as ‘substantially warmer than annual changes’ or ‘substantially cooler than annual 290

changes’ if ΔTGS - ΔTAnn > 0.2 ºC or ΔTGS - ΔTAnn < -0.2 ºC (respectively) for 3 of the 5 291

HAPPI models. We next examine areas that do not meet those criteria for consistency in 292

the direction of the difference, classifying local growing season changes as ‘consistently 293

warmer than annual changes’ if ΔTGS - ΔTAnn > 0 ºC for all HAPPI models. We do the 294

same in the opposite direction for ‘cooler’ classifications, and then all remaining grid cells 295

are designated as ‘small or inconsistent changes’. A similar procedure classified ‘wetter’ 296

and ‘drier’ local growing seasons using a threshold of +/-5% difference (compared to 297

current period climate) for substantially different ΔPGS. Note that areas meeting both the 298

‘substantially’ and ‘consistently’ different criteria are classified as ‘substantially’ different. 299

300

3. Results of climate change projections for agricultural regions 301

The +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds are defined by their global mean temperature increases, yet 302

projections reveal important variations across regions, seasons, and the characteristics of 303

climate extremes. Uncertainty is heightened for phenomena simulated at finer temporal 304

Page 15: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

15

and spatial scales where there is greater influence from physical processes beyond the limit 305

of climate model resolution and a lack of aggregation. Assessments of agricultural risks 306

are reliant on this fine-scale information given the potential for non-linear climatic 307

responses and the application of crop models on a hectare scale in AgMIP (Asseng et al., 308

2013, 2015; Bassu et al., 2014; Ruane et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Pirttioja et al., 2015; 309

Fleisher et al., 2017). Simulations for the CGRA assessment of +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds 310

likewise need information with more detail than the global annual mean temperature 311

analysis, particularly given that the ½º x ½º resolution grids utilized for global crop model 312

simulations are finer than the horizontal resolution of most global climate models (Ruane 313

et al., 2018; Rosenzweig et al., 2018). 314

315

3.1. Mean changes for +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds 316

Mean annual climate changes in HAPPI projections of the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds 317

compared to the 2010 current climate (Figures 1a-b and 2a-b, respectively) generally 318

reflect the major patterns described in recent IPCC assessments, with the signal of change 319

becoming more clear as global mean temperature increases (Collins et al., 2013). These 320

simulations highlight uncertainties in HAPPI models related to the distribution of 321

additional energy trapped in the system by greenhouse gases and other anthropogenic 322

influences, differentiating climate challenges for agricultural regions. Rosenzweig et al. 323

(2018) provide a comprehensive example of HAPPI uncertainty in displaying each GCM 324

projection for rainfed maize climate changes. 325

326

Page 16: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

16

Warming over land generally exceeds the global mean temperature rise since 2010 (~0.58 327

ºC and ~1.08 ºC for the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds, respectively; recall that 2010 was 0.92 328

ºC above pre-industrial) owing to the ocean’s larger aggregate heat capacity. The poles 329

also warm faster than the tropics given snow-ice albedo feedbacks and the prominence of 330

high-latitude longwave radiation emissions in the global energy balance. Arid region 331

temperatures rise more rapidly as a lack of available soil moisture limits evaporation and 332

causes a larger portion of excess energy to go into sensible heat. Farmlands are not evenly 333

distributed around the globe, however, as agricultural regions are generally rare in arid 334

regions and at higher latitudes where sub-freezing temperatures shorten the viable growing 335

season. Agricultural area-weighted temperature changes are therefore closer to the global 336

average but depend on a given GCM’s distribution of the warming signal owing to ocean-337

atmosphere heat exchanges, radiative feedback processes, and atmospheric circulation 338

patterns. Projections of the +1.5 ºC World show stronger agreement in temperature 339

changes at low and high latitudes as overall temperature changes are comparable to the 340

range between GCM projections; however, many of the mid-latitude agricultural regions 341

have substantial GCM spread. In the +2.0 ºC World, projected temperature changes are 342

at least double the GCM range for most areas and seasons. Uncertainty is larger over 343

prominent wheat-growing regions of Eastern Europe and central North America in addition 344

to regions where agriculture is less prominent, such as over the Tibetan Plateau, the inner 345

Amazon, and north of the Caspian Sea. 346

347

In many regions and agricultural seasons there is not strong agreement in the direction of 348

precipitation changes (Figure 1b). Mean annual precipitation generally increases over land 349

Page 17: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

17

given an overall increase in evaporation and transpiration as warmer conditions lead to 350

higher vapor pressure deficits even when relative humidities are maintained. Regional 351

differences reflect a more vigorous water cycle that exacerbates given atmospheric 352

moisture convergence patterns wherein convergence (wet) areas generally become wetter 353

and divergence (dry) areas are more prone to drying (Trenberth et al., 2011; Collins et al., 354

2013). Notable exceptions include drying over the Amazon (due in part to land cover 355

changes) and an increase in precipitation over Eastern Africa and Western Asia (likely 356

connected to large-scale circulation patterns associated with the South Asian monsoon; 357

Christensen et al., 2013). The South Asian monsoon benefits from more water vapor 358

transport as higher atmospheric specific humidities overwhelm slight reductions in the 359

strength of the monsoon circulation (Christensen et al., 2013). A reduction in aerosols 360

associated with RCP2.6 end-of-century forcings utilized in HAPPI simulations also 361

reduces the inhibition of precipitation in South and Southeast Asia (Carl-Friedrich 362

Schleussner, personal communication). 363

364

Changing precipitation patterns and shifts in the hydrologic cycle will drive shifts in soil 365

moisture and evapotranspiration demand, which HAPPI and CMIP earth system models 366

simulate using dynamic vegetation models of varying complexity (most have a very simple 367

representation of agricultural systems; McDermid et al., 2017). Projected changes in soil 368

moisture and evapotranspiration are beyond the present study’s focus on climate scenarios 369

for agricultural modeling applications given that AgMIP’s agricultural models simulate 370

these quantities internally. 371

372

Page 18: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

18

3.2. Unique characteristics of changes for growing seasons 373

Agricultural systems are most vulnerable to climate changes affecting major production 374

regions and core growing seasons. HAPPI projections for the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds 375

feature substantial seasonal variation reflecting the annual cycle of atmospheric circulation 376

patterns, local radiation balances, and shifts in land surface characteristics. 377

378

Figures 1c-j and 2c-j show the growing season temperature and precipitation change 379

patterns over regions with substantial maize, wheat, rice, and soy production. Many of the 380

highest temperature and precipitation change regions are not agriculturally prominent (e.g., 381

high latitudes, high elevations, and arid regions), and thus the overall comparison reveals 382

more muted climate changes for agricultural regions and seasons than for the annual mean 383

global picture. Regional temperature patterns from the annual change map are generally 384

maintained from season to season, indicating that these are larger than monthly differences 385

in temperature change at any given location. Growing season and annual precipitation 386

changes are similar because rainfed cultivation tends to occur in the local rainy season, 387

which has a disproportionate influence on total annual rainfall totals. Process-based 388

models and empirical studies show that global cereal production responds negatively to 389

increasing temperatures (Rosenzweig et al., 2013; Asseng et al., 2013,4; Bassu et al., 2014; 390

Challinor et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2017), and the food system implications 391

of these projections are explored further within the AgMIP CGRA (Ruane et al., 2018; 392

Rosenzweig et al., 2018). 393

394

Page 19: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

19

Zonal patterns are readily apparent in growing season climate change characteristics using 395

the classifications of ‘substantially’ and ‘consistently’ different than annual climate 396

changes presented in Figure 3 for each growing season in the +1.5 ºC World (Figure S3 397

displays the corresponding +2.0 ºC World maps). Growing seasons are generally projected 398

to warm at a slower rate than the annual mean in the humid tropics (e.g., in Brazil, Central 399

and Western Africa, Southern India, and Southeast Asia). In these regions cultivation is 400

aligned with a strongly seasonal rain band or wet monsoon phase that reduces local 401

warming compared to the dry seasons. Growing seasons in the semi-arid tropics (e.g., 402

Mexico, East Africa, and northern India) tend to warm consistently faster than the annual 403

signal, and in Mediterranean climates (including Eastern Australia) ΔTGS is accelerated in 404

association with drying trends. ΔTGS for high-latitude agricultural regions is lower than 405

the annual average given the pronounced snow-ice feedbacks that dominate the non-406

agricultural winter season. The region around Uruguay is an exception to this zonal 407

pattern, with heightened ΔTGS potentially linked to a precipitation pattern that also 408

enhances seasonal rainfall. 409

410

ΔPGS is substantially and consistently wetter than ΔPAnn over the South Asian and Southeast 411

Asian monsoon, with exceptions where the local growing season does not correspond with 412

the main monsoon rains (e.g., Indonesian maize, Indian wheat; see Figure S3). 413

Mediterranean drying affects agricultural seasons more strongly than the annual average 414

as it is most acute during the agricultural spring and summer seasons (see also Collins et 415

al., 2013). A dipole over North America indicates enhanced growing season drying in the 416

continental interior and wetter conditions in the Southern and Eastern United States, 417

Page 20: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

20

exacerbating the annual trend. ΔPGS is drier than ΔPAnn for most Southern Hemisphere 418

wheat growing seasons, suggesting the potential for shifts in planting and harvest dates as 419

seasonal patterns change amidst a generally drying trend in Australia, Southern Africa, and 420

portions of South America. 421

422

Regional patterns in temperature and precipitation changes are largely consistent between 423

the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds. The magnitude of these regional changes is broadly 424

consistent with an approximate doubling in deviation from today’s conditions between the 425

1.5 and 2.0 ºC Worlds (tracking the global mean temperature rises of 0.58 and 1.08 ºC, 426

respectively). 427

428

3.3. Changes in agro-climatological extremes 429

The stability of agricultural systems under a +1.5 or +2.0 ºC World will depend not only 430

on mean climate conditions but also on interannual variations that exacerbate the risk of 431

poor harvests that stakeholders must manage. Figure 4 demonstrates the ways in which 432

the distributions of extreme heat and drought years shift in comparison to current climate, 433

utilizing the subset of HAPPI daily bias-corrected and downscaled data (each with 200 434

seasons from 20 ensemble-members’ 10-year simulations). In most tropical and extra-435

tropical regions, rainfed maize season temperatures in the +1.5 ºC World exceed the current 436

period ‘extreme heat’ year (defined as the 90th percentile growing season mean 437

temperature) in more than half of all years (Fig. 4a). This is true even in Southeast Asia 438

where mean temperatures rise more slowly, as the extreme temperature threshold is low 439

owing to limited interannual variability in the current climate. A dramatic increase in 440

Page 21: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

21

extreme years is also projected in mid-latitude regions including portions of Northeast 441

Asia, Southern Europe, and the Eastern United States. Thus, even relatively low levels of 442

warming can lead to substantial anomalies, and these are particularly noticeable where 443

current interannual variation is low even as mean climate changes are lower than those at 444

higher latitudes (Figure 1c). 445

446

Diffenbaugh et al. (2018) likewise noted dramatic increases in extreme conditions under 447

+1.5 and +2.0 ºC warming scenarios. Changes in mean conditions alone can increase the 448

probability of crop failures as growing season climate moves closer to dangerous 449

biophysical thresholds (Hatfield et al., 2011; Lobell et al., 2011, 2013; Zhao et al., 2017). 450

The frequency of ‘extreme drought’ years in the +1.5 ºC World (defined as the 10th 451

percentile growing season total precipitation) generally become less common (occurring 452

less than 10% of the time) in areas where rainfall is increasing Fig. 1d), but the frequency 453

of drought conditions increases in many places where median rainfall changes were small 454

or negative (e.g., Indonesia, Peru, Mexico, the Northern US Plains, Europe) (Fig. 4b). 455

456

The additional half-degree warming between the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds is projected to 457

have substantial impacts on extreme conditions. Many mid-latitude regions see 20-40% 458

more years becoming extreme heat years in the +2.0 ºC World (Fig 4c), with smaller 459

increases in the tropics largely because many of those regions already had a high percentage 460

of extreme heat years in the +1.5 ºC World (Fig 4a). Changes between the frequency of 461

extreme drought between the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds (Fig. 4d) show the general 462

exacerbation of changes in the +1.5 ºC World patterns (Fig 4b). However, many areas show 463

Page 22: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

22

a reduction or even slight reversal of these drought frequency trends as the extreme drought 464

years had already been reduced by mean precipitation increases (e.g., in the monsoon 465

regions of South and Eastern Asia). 466

467

It is possible that this increase in climate extremes comes simply from changes in mean 468

conditions, so we additionally examine changes in the temperature and precipitation 469

distributions by comparing changes in the extreme percentiles against median changes for 470

each bias-corrected GCM (Figs. 4d,e). If the 90th percentile of the temperature distribution 471

is warming more rapidly than the median this indicates a skew toward more extreme heat 472

years. This is apparent for many tropical and Asian monsoon regions. The opposite 473

skewness toward less extreme heat years is projected for more northerly latitudes. The 474

Eastern United States inverts this meridional pattern, with more extreme heat skewness in 475

the Great Lakes region and less in the Southern US. Skewness toward more or less extreme 476

drought years (whereby the 10th percentile precipitation dries in comparison to the median 477

change) shows much larger spatial variation and no clear large-scale patterns. Schleussner 478

et al. (2018) examine the effects that changing distributions of climate extremes have on 479

yield reliability within the CGRA crop model simulations. 480

481

482

4. Agro-climatic changes for major breadbaskets 483

Climate change impacts on top cereal-producing countries merit closer investigation as 484

they have a disproportionate influence on global food markets because they drive livestock 485

prices in addition to cereal prices, given the importance of grain-based animal feed. 486

Page 23: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

23

Climate shocks in these countries may also threaten global food security through 487

disruptions in food exports. As agricultural production is concentrated in breadbaskets 488

within these countries, Figures 5 and 6 show the mean growing season temperature and 489

precipitation changes (weighted by area growing the rainfed crop within each country) 490

from each HAPPI GCM for the top 10 maize, wheat, rice, and soy production countries for 491

the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds, respectively (You et al., 2014). 492

493

Overall temperatures in these high-producing countries show mean warming that is larger 494

than the inter-GCM spread, providing higher confidence in projections even as warming is 495

lower in the tropics than at higher latitudes. Precipitation changes are mixed, with large 496

variation in sign and magnitude across GCMs and breadbaskets. Wheat growing seasons 497

demonstrate the largest precipitation change variations, while rice seasons are consistent 498

in projecting wetter conditions given the prominence of the Asian monsoons in global rice 499

production (results in Indonesia, Brazil, and Nigeria are less consistent). 500

501

Projected changes between the current period and the +1.5 ºC World are generally extended 502

in the +2.0 ºC World, with similar variation among breadbaskets and GCMs. Although all 503

GCMs have nearly identical global mean surface temperature increases for a given climate 504

stabilization, the patterns of warming (between oceans, land, specific land areas, and 505

different seasons) depend on internal model parameters and structures. MIROC5 stands 506

out as exceptionally warm for many breadbasket regions in the +1.5 ºC World, but 507

HadAM3P is most often the warmest over main agricultural countries for the +2.0 ºC 508

World. Warming between the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds exceeds the global average 0.5 ºC 509

Page 24: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

24

in several breadbaskets (as discussed in Section 3.1), notably including US and Romanian 510

maize, US and Canadian wheat, and US soy. Many leading rice-producing countries are 511

projected to lag the global warming pace given their tropical location and prevailing wetter 512

conditions. 513

514

515

5. Comparing stabilization and transient projections for agricultural model 516

applications 517

Figure 7 compares aggregate temperature and precipitation changes over land for HAPPI 518

and CMIP5. Despite being a 5-GCM subset representing a much larger GCM ensemble, 519

the HAPPI simulations display an overall spread that is comparable to that of the 31-520

member CMIP5 ensemble. 521

522

5.1 Annual changes 523

Annual changes over land in HAPPI and CMIP5 are larger than the global signal, with the 524

land-sea contrast increasing as median land temperatures rise by more than 0.5 ºC between 525

the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds (0.59 ºC in HAPPI, 0.64 ºC in CMIP5). An earlier arrival of 526

+1.5 and +2.0 ºC conditions and a higher stabilization ceiling was also noted in projections 527

over the US (Karmalker and Bradley, 2017). MIROC5 produces the largest HAPPI land 528

temperature increases for the +1.5 ºC World, but HadAM3P is more extreme for the +2.0 529

ºC World. Precipitation over land increases between the +1.5 ºC and +2.0 ºC Worlds on 530

average, with increases (0.8% in HAPPI and 0.98% in CMIP5) slightly above the 1% K-1 531

Page 25: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

25

noted for global precipitation changes in the CMIP5 ensemble due to an overall 532

amplification of the water cycle and moisture transport (Pendergrass and Hartmann, 2014). 533

534

5.2 Growing season changes 535

ΔTGS for each season (weighted by harvested rainfed area across all land) is more uncertain 536

than the all-land and all-season ΔTAnn across both the stabilization and transient scenarios, 537

as would be expected for more specific geographic regions and seasons. ΔTGS is also lower 538

than ΔTAnn as agricultural lands are disproportionately located away from arid and polar 539

regions that warm most rapidly, in addition to cultivation occurring in the wetter and frost-540

free months of the year. Much of the accelerated ΔTAnn over land comes from high-latitude 541

regions, so agricultural lands fall increasingly behind the pace of land ΔTAnn in the +2.0 ºC 542

World. The largest ΔTGS and ΔPGS uncertainties are in the wheat season, potentially owing 543

to the location of wheat systems predominantly in mid-latitude regions affected by variable 544

storm tracks (recall Figure 1e). ΔPGS in both HAPPI and CMIP5 ensembles lag behind the 545

Δ PAnn for wheat (owing largely to drier conditions in Europe and central North America), 546

while the rice season has the most dramatic lag in warming and an accelerated increase in 547

precipitation (likely due to the importance of monsoon precipitation changes in the global 548

land signal). 549

550

The projected rice-growing season features the largest differences between the HAPPI 551

stabilization and the CMIP5 transient ensembles. Global rice production is dominated by 552

intense rice cultivation in the monsoon regions of Asia that currently experience some of 553

the highest aerosol concentrations in the world. The HAPPI simulations include a dramatic 554

Page 26: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

26

reduction in aerosols according to end-of-century RCP2.6 conditions, while these levels 555

are not achieved in CMIP5 RCP4.5 transients (nor would the same levels be seen in RCP2.6 556

transients that first reach +1.5 or +2.0 ºC warming well before the end of the century). 557

With reduced aerosols the HAPPI simulations warm rice production regions more rapidly, 558

raising global aggregated median rice-season temperatures by 0.19 ºC compared to CMIP5 559

for both stabilization worlds. The signal of aerosols is less clear in rice season 560

precipitation, as there remains substantial uncertainty in GCM simulation of aerosol effects 561

on evaporation, heat pumping, and precipitation inhibition (Ramanathan et al., 2005; Lau 562

and Kim, 2006; Rind et al., 2009; Boucher et al., 2013). 563

564

565

6. Discussion 566

Mean growing season climate changes and shifts in the distribution of interannual events 567

characterize agricultural system challenges for the +1.5 and +2.0 °C Worlds, although 568

climate changes associated with the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds are small in comparison to 569

end-of-century shifts in transient RCP8.5 simulations (~4 to 6 ºC above pre-industrial 570

conditions from ensemble of 39 GCMs in Collins et al., 2013). However, projected 571

conditions in major agricultural regions are likely to require substantial adaptation even 572

under these highly-mitigated climate stabilizations. While cereal-producing regions 573

generally experience a slower pace of warming in growing seasons than other land areas, 574

projected precipitation changes demonstrate high uncertainty and spatial variability that 575

will lead to regional wetting and drying trends even as global precipitation increases 576

slightly. Precipitation patterns over Norther America indicate that the dipole of a drying 577

Page 27: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

27

continental interior and wetter East and Southeast will be more pronounced in the 578

summertime growing seasons than in the annual average. 579

580

Even with these relatively low levels of mean warming farmers are projected to experience 581

a dramatic increase in the probability of what are currently considered extremely hot 582

growing seasons, and many regions experiencing drier average conditions would also 583

experience an increase in extreme drought seasons. These challenges are apparent even in 584

the +1.5 ºC World, and are exacerbated in the +2.0 ºC World, particularly as regional 585

warming patterns cause many agricultural regions to warm by more than 0.5 ºC between 586

Worlds. HAPPI simulations provide useful insight into these targeted end states, but 587

uncertainties remain owing partially to difficulties in representing desired climate 588

stabilizations rather than simulating transient scenarios. Major production regions for 589

maize, wheat, and soy face larger average temperature increases than rice production 590

regions, which also are more likely to see increases in precipitation although both rice 591

effects may be influenced by HAPPI assumptions about reduced aerosol loading and 592

aerosol effects on Asian monsoon regions. For agricultural applications CO2 levels in the 593

+1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds (and their impact on agricultural systems) remains a major 594

uncertainty that can reverse the overall direction of production changes (Ruane et al., 2018; 595

Rosenzweig et al., 2018). 596

597

Agricultural sector impacts for the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds may be characterized by 598

linking the climate conditions described here with biophysical models (to determine 599

climate impacts on plant processes and production), and economic models (to understand 600

Page 28: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

28

profit, trade, and resource allocation). Interdependence of global and regional 601

stakeholders can be explored through markets, policies, global climate, and resource 602

competition. AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments utilize the climate 603

scenarios described in Section 2 to represent +1.5 and +2.0 ºC World climates for a 604

prototype integrated, multi-disciplinary, multi-scale, and multi-model assessment that 605

explores direct biophysical impacts and their implications for regional and global markets 606

(Ruane et al., 2018; Rosenzweig et al., 2018). 607

608

Several important climate-related mechanisms are not directly evaluated here and are 609

needed to further inform the development of effective adaptation strategies for agriculture. 610

Priority areas for scenario generation and future evaluations include: 611

Damages from floods and water-logging in farming regions where precipitation is 612

projected to increase (Ruane et al., 2013); 613

CO2 fertilization effects on crops and their interactions with drought (Boote et al., 614

2010; O’Leary et al., 2015; Kimball, 2016; Deryng et al., 2016); 615

Effects of sea-level rise and shifting hurricane intensities on agricultural production 616

in coastal floodplains (Church et al., 2013); 617

Acute damages from short-duration heat waves affecting critical crop development 618

stages (Asseng et al., 2015; Maiorano et al., 2017); 619

Changes in sowing and harvest dates in response to changing climatic conditions 620

(Tadross et al., 2009; Crespo et al., 2011; Glotter and Elliott, 2016); 621

Shifts in major modes of climate variability (e.g., the El Niño/Southern Oscillation 622

or North Atlantic Oscillation; Iizumi et al., 2014); 623

Page 29: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

29

Competition over managed water resources (Elliott et al., 2014); 624

Shifts in cropping areas associated with climate and socioeconomic development 625

(Wiebe et al., 2015); and 626

Crop losses from damaging pests, diseases, and weeds (Savary et al., 2012; 627

Donatelli et al., 2017). 628

A primary limitation remains the collection and dissemination of high-quality experimental 629

and observational data along the climate-crop-economic-human outcome pathway. 630

Through AgMIP, the agricultural research community is developing improved models and 631

systematic protocols to address many of these gaps. 632

633

The combination of HAPPI and CMIP5 projections analyzed here indicate climate 634

challenges for agricultural regions even under high mitigation scenarios. Results and 635

agricultural model impact assessments, particularly those that compare against lower 636

mitigation scenarios with more dramatic climate changes, can inform cost-benefit analysis 637

that weigh the relative burden placed on adaptation, mitigation, and disruption to the 638

agricultural system. By projecting the challenges facing future farmers, we also aim to 639

provide climate condition targets for agricultural technologies that will increase resilience 640

for vulnerable farm systems around the world. 641

642

Acknowledgements 643

The authors thank the HAPPI team (Dann Mitchell, Myles Allen, Carl-Friedrich 644

Schleussner, Peter Uhe, Mamunur Rashid) for calculating aggregate statistics and 645

providing daily bias-corrected and downscaled outputs. We acknowledge the World 646

Page 30: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

30

Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is 647

responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups (noted in Table 2) for 648

producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the U. S. Department of 649

Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides 650

coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with 651

the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. This work was supported by 652

the National Aeronautics and Space Agency Science Mission Directorate (WBS 653

281945.02.03.06.79) and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA OCE grant 58-0111-654

16-010). We also thank Greg Reppucci for assistance in preparing figure graphics. Results 655

reflect the findings of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the 656

sponsoring agencies. 657

Page 31: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

31

References 658

Antle, J.M., Valdivia, R.O., Boote, K.J., Janssen, S., Jones, J.W., Porter, C.H., Rosenzweig, 659

C., Ruane, A.C., Thorburn, P.J., 2015. AgMIP’s Trans-disciplinary Agricultural 660

Systems Approach to Regional Integrated Assessment of Climate Impact, 661

Vulnerability and Adaptation. In: The Handbook of Climate Change and 662

Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement 663

Project Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments, Part 1 [Rosenzweig, C., Hillel, 664

D. (eds.)]. Imperial College Press, London. 27-44. 665

doi:10.1142/9781783265640_0002. 666

Antle, J.M., Cho, S., Tabatatie, H., Valdivia, R., 2018. Economic and Environmental 667

Performance of the U.S. Pacific Northwest Wheat System in a Low Greenhouse 668

Gas Emissions World. Journal of Environmental Management, submitted. 669

Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J.W., Hatfield, J.L., Ruane, A.C., Boote, 670

K.J., Thorburn, P., Rötter, R.P., Cammarano, D., Brisson, N., Basso, B., Martre, P., 671

Aggarwal, P.K., Angulo, C., Bertuzzi, P., Biernath, C., Challinor, A.J., Doltra, J., 672

Gayler, S., Goldberg, R., Grant, R., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L.A., Ingwersen, 673

J., Izaurralde, R.C., Kersebaum, K.C., Müller, C., Naresh Kumar, S., Nendel, C., 674

O’Leary, G., Olesen, J.E., Osborne, T.M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D., 675

Semenov, M.A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C., Stratonovitch, P., Streck, 676

T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., Wallach, D., White, J.W., Williams, 677

J.R., Wolf, J., 2013. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. 678

Nature Clim. Change 3, 827-832. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916. 679

Asseng, S., and co-authors, 2015: Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. 680

Nature Clim. Change, 5, no. 2, 143-147, doi:10.1038/nclimate2470. 681

Bassu, S., Brisson, N., Durand, J.-L., Boote, K., Lizaso, J., Jones, J.W., Rosenzweig, C., 682

Ruane, A.C., Adam, M., Baron, C., Basso, B., Biernath, C., Boogaard, H., Conijn, 683

S., Corbeels, M., Deryng, D., De Sanctis, G., Gayler, S., Grassini, P., Hatfield, J., 684

Hoek, S., Izaurralde, C., Jongschaap, R., Kemanian, A.R., Kersebaum, K.C., Kim, 685

S.H., Kumar, N.S., Makowski, D., Müller, C., Nendel, C., Priesack, E., Pravia, 686

M.V., Sau, F., Shcherbak, I., Tao, F., Teixeira, E., Timlin, D., Waha, K., 2014. How 687

do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? 688

Glob. Change Biol., 20, no. 7, 2301-2320, doi:10.1111/gcb.12520. 689

Beddington, J., Asaduzzaman, M., Clark, M., Fernández, A., Guillou, M., Jahn, M., Erda, 690

L., Mamo, T., Van Bo, N., Nobre, C.A., Scholes, R., Sharma, R., Wakhungu, J., 691

2012. Achieving food security in the face of climate change: Final report from the 692

Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change. CGIAR Research 693

Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). 694

Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org/commission. 695

Boote, K.J., Allen Jr., L.H., Prasad, P.V.V., Jones, J.W., 2010. Testing Effects of Climate 696

Change in Crop Models. In: The Handbook of Climate Change and 697

Agroecosystems [Rosenzweig, C., Hillel, D. (eds.)]. Imperial College Press, 698

Singapore. 109-129. 699

Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, 700

V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S.K., Sherwood, S., 701

Stevens, B., Zhang, X.Y., 2013. Clouds and Aerosols. In: Climate Change 2013: 702

Page 32: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

32

The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth 703

Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, 704

T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., 705

Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 706

United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 707

Brown, M.E., Antle, J.M., Backlund, P., Carr, E.R., Easterling, W.E., Walsh, M.K., 708

Ammann, C., Attavanich, W., Barrett, C.B., Bellemare, M.F., Dancheck, V., Funk, 709

C., Grace, K., Ingram, J.S.I., Jiang, H., Maletta, H., Mata, T., Murray, A., Ngugi, 710

M., Ojima, D., O’Neill, B., Tebaldi, C., 2015. Climate Change, Global Food 711

Security, and the U.S. Food System. 146 pages. Available online at 712

http://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/FoodSecurity2015Assessment/FullAsse713

ssment.pdf. doi: 10.7930/J0862DC7. 714

Clarke, L., Jiang, K., Akimoto, K., Babiker, M., Blanford, G., Fisher-Vanden, K., 715

Hourcade, J.-C., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Löschel, A., McCollum, D., Paltsev, S., 716

Rose, S., Shukla, P.R., Tavoni, M., van der Zwaan, B.C.C., van Vuuren, D.P., 2014. 717

Assessing Transformation Pathways. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of 718

Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report 719

of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, 720

R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, 721

S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., 722

Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United 723

Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 724

Challinor, A.J., and co-authors, 2014: A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change 725

and adaptation. Nature Climate Change 4(4), 287-291. 726

doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2153 727

Christensen, J.H., Krishna Kumar, K., Aldrian, E., An, S.-I., Cavalcanti, I.F.A., de Castro, 728

M., Dong, W., Goswami, P., Hall, A., Kanyanga, J.K., Kitoh, A., Kossin, J., Lau, 729

N.-C., Renwick, J., Stephenson, D.B., Xie, S.-P., Zhou, T., 2013. Climate 730

Phenomena and their Relevance for Future Regional Climate Change. In: Climate 731

Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the 732

Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 733

[Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., 734

Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 735

Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 736

Church, J.A., Clark, P.U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J.M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., 737

Merrifield, M.A., Milne, G.A., Nerem, R.S., Nunn, P.D., Payne, A.J., Pfeffer, W.T., 738

Stammer, D., Unnikrishnan, A.S., 2013. Sea Level Change. In: Climate Change 739

2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth 740

Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, 741

T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., 742

Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 743

United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 744

Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., Gao, 745

X., Gutowski, W.J., Johns, T., Krinner, G., Shongwe, M., Tebaldi, C., Weaver, A.J., 746

Wehner, M., 2013. Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and 747

irreversibility. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution 748

Page 33: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

33

of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel 749

on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., 750

Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge 751

University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 752

Crespo, O., Hachigonta, S., Tadross, M., 2011. Sensitivity of southern African maize yields 753

to the definition of sowing dekad in a changing climate. Climatic Change 106:267-754

283. 755

Deryng, D., Elliott, J., Ruane, A.C., Folberth, C., Müller, C., Pugh, T.A.M., Schmid, E., 756

Boote, K.J., Conway, D., Gerten, D., Jones, J.W., Khabarov, N., Olin, S., 757

Schaphoff, S., Yang, H., Rosenzweig, C., 2016. Regional disparities in the 758

beneficial effects of rising CO2 concentrations on crop water productivity. Nature 759

Clim. Change, 6(8), 786-790, doi:10.1038/nclimate2995. 760

Diffenbaugh, N.S., Singh, D., Mankin, J.S., 2018. Unprecedented climate events: 761

Historical changes, aspirational targets, and national commitments. Sci. Adv. 4, 762

eaao3354. 763

Donatelli, M., Magarey, R.D., Bregaglio, S., Willocquet, L., Whish, J.P.M., Savary, S., 764

2017. Modelling the impacts of pests and diseases on agricultural systems. 765

Agricultural Systems 155, 213-224. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.019. 766

Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Müller, C., Frieler, K., Konzmann, M., Gerten, D., Glotter, M., 767

Flörke, M., Wada, Y., Best, N., Eisner, S., Fekete, B.M., Folberth, C., Foster, I., 768

Gosling, S.N., Haddeland, I., Khabarov, N., Ludwig, F., Masaki, Y., Olin, S., 769

Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A.C., Satoh, Y., Schmid, E., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., Wisser, 770

D., 2014. Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on 771

agricultural production under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, no. 9, 772

3239-3244, doi:10.1073/pnas.1222474110. 773

Elliott, J., Müller, C., Deryng, D., Chryssanthacopoulos, J., Boote, K.J., Büchner, M., 774

Foster, I., Glotter, M., Heinke, J., Iizumi, T., Izaurralde, R.C., Mueller, N.D., Ray, 775

D.K., Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A.C., Sheffield, J., 2015. The Global Gridded Crop 776

Model Intercomparison: Data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. 777

Model Dev., 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015. 778

Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J., Taylor, K.E., 779

2016a. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) 780

experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937-1958, 781

doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016. 782

FAO, 2016. The State of Food and Agriculture: Climate Change, Agriculture and Food 783

Security. 194 pages. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf. 784

Faye, B., et al., 2018: What does 1.5 versus 2.0°C of global warming mean for cereal yields 785

in the West African Sudan Savannah? Environmental Research Letters 13, 034014. 786

doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaab40. 787

Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S.C., Collins, W., Cox, P., 788

Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P., Guilyardi, E., Jakob, 789

C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., Rummukainen, M., 2013. Evaluation of climate 790

models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of 791

Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel 792

on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., 793

Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge 794

Page 34: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

34

University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 741–795

882, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020. 796

Fleisher, D.H., Condori, B., Quiroz, R., Alva, A., Asseng, S., Barreda, C., Bindi, M., Boote, 797

K.J., Ferrise, R., Franke, A.C., Govindakrishnan, P.M., Harahagazwe, D., 798

Hoogenboom, G., Naresh Kumar, S., Merante, P., Nendel, C., Olesen, J.E., Parker, 799

P.S., Raes, D., Raymundo, R., Ruane, A.C., Stockle, S., Supit, I., Vanuytrecht, E., 800

Wolf, J., Woli, P., 2017. A potato model inter-comparison across varying climates 801

and productivity levels. Glob. Change Biol., 23, no. 3, 1258-1281, 802

doi:10.1111/gcb.13411. 803

Glotter, M., Elliott, J., 2016: Simulating US agriculture in a modern Dust Bowl drought. 804

Nature Plants, 3, 16193, doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.193. 805

Hansen, J., Sato, M., Hearty, P., Ruedy, R., Kelley, M., Masson-Delmotte, V., Russell, G., 806

Tselioudis, G., Cao, J., Rignot, E., Velicogna, I., Tormey, B., Donovan, B., 807

Kandiano, E., von Schuckmann, K., Kharecha, P., LeGrande, A.N., Bauer, M., Lo, 808

K.-M., 2016. Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: Evidence from paleoclimate 809

data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2°C global warming could 810

be dangerous. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3761-3812. 811

Hartmann, D.L., Klein Tank, A.M.G., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L.V., Brönnimann, S., 812

Charabi, Y., Dentener, F.J., Dlugokencky, E.J., Easterling, D.R., Kaplan, A., 813

Soden, B.J., Thorne, P.W., Wild, M., Zhai, P.M., 2013. Observations: Atmosphere 814

and Surface. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution 815

of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel 816

on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., 817

Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge 818

University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 819

Hatfield, J.L., Boote, K.J., Kimball, B.A., Ziska, L.H., Izaurralde, R.C., Ort, D., Thomson, 820

A.M., Wolfe, D., 2011: Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop 821

Production. Agronomy, 103(2), doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0303. 822

Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Shewe, J., Piontek, F., 2013. A trend-preserving 823

bias correction – the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 219–236. 824

Howden, S.M., Soussana, J.F., Tubiello, F.N., Chhetri, N., Dunlop, M., Meinke, H., 2007. 825

Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of 826

Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19691–19696. 827

doi:10.1073/pnas.0701890104. 828

IPCC, 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science 829

Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the 830

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-831

K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, 832

P.M. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New 833

York, NY, USA. 834

IPCC, 2014: Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, 835

and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working 836

Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 837

Change [Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., 838

Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., 839

Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., White, L.L. (eds.)]. 840

Page 35: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

35

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, 841

USA. 1-32. 842

Iizumi, T., Luo, J.-J., Challinor, A.J., Sakurai, G., Yokozawa, M., Sakuma, H., Brown, 843

M.E., Yamagata, T. 2014. Impacts of El Niño Southern Oscillation on the global 844

yields of major crops. Nature Communications 5 (3712), 845

doi:10.1038/ncomms4712. 846

Karmalker, A.V., Bradley, R.S., 2017. Consequences of Global Warming of 1.5 ºC and 2 847

ºC for Regional Temperature and Precipitation Changes in the Contiguous United 848

States. PLOS One, 12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168697. 849

Kimball, B.A., 2016. Crop responses to elevated CO2 and interactions with H2O, N, and 850

temperature. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 31, 36-43. 851

Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Ebi, K.L., Kram, T., Riahi, K., Winkler, H., van 852

Vuuren, D.P., 2014. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the 853

concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climatic Change, 122, 401–414, 854

doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5. 855

Lau, K.-M., Kim, K.-M., 2006. Observational relationships between aerosol and Asian 856

monsoon rainfall, and circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L21810, 857

doi:10.1029/2006GL027546. 858

Li, T., Hasegawa, T., Yin, X., Zhu, Y., Boote, K., Adam, M., Bregaglio, S., Buis, S., 859

Confalonieri, R., Fumoto, T., Gaydon, D., Marcaida III, M., Nakagawa, H., Oriol, 860

P., Ruane, A.C., Ruget, F., Singh, B., Singh, U., Tang, L., Tao, F., Wilkens, P., 861

Yoshida, H., Zhang, Z., Bouman, B., 2015. Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by 862

current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob. Change Biol., 863

21, no. 3, 1328-1341, doi:10.1111/gcb.12758. 864

Lobell, D.B., Hammer, G.L., McLean, G., Messina, C., Roberts, M.J., Schlenker, W., 2013. 865

The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nature 866

Climate Change 3:497. 867

Lobell, D.B., Bänziger, M., Magorokosho, C., Vivek, B., 2011. Nonlinear heat effects on 868

African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate Change 1:42-869

45. 870

Lopez, A., Suckling, E.B., Smith, L.A., 2014. Robustness of pattern scaled climate change 871

scenarios for adaptation decision support. Climatic Change, 122, 555–566, 872

doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1022-y. 873

Maiorano, A., Martre, P., Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Müller, C., Rötter, R., Ruane, A.C., 874

Semenov, M., Wallach, D., Wang, E., Alderman, P., Kassie, B., Biernath, C., 875

Basso, B., Cammarano, D., Challinor, A.J., Doltra, J., Dumont, B., Eyshi Rezaei, 876

E., Gayler, S., Kersebaum, K.C., Kimball, B.A., Koehler, A.K., Liu, B., O'Leary, 877

G.J., Olesen, J.E., Ottman, M.J., Priesack, E., Reynolds, M.P., Stratonovitch, P., 878

Streck, T., Thorburn, P.J., Waha, K., Wall, G.W., White, J.W., Zhao, Z., Zhu, Y., 879

2017. Crop model improvement reduces the uncertainty of the response to 880

temperature of multi-model ensembles. Field Crops Res., 202, 5-20, 881

doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.001. 882

McDermid, S.P., Mearns, L.O., Ruane, A.C., 2017. Representing agriculture in Earth 883

System Models: Approaches and priorities for development. J. Adv. Model. Earth 884

Syst., 9, no. 5, 2230-2265, doi:10.1002/2016MS000749. 885

Page 36: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

36

Mitchell, D., AchutaRao, K., Allen, M., Bethke, I., Beyerle, U., Ciavarella, A., Forster, 886

P.M., Fuglestvedt, J., Gillett, N., Haustein, K., Ingram, W., Iversen, T., Kharin, V., 887

Klingaman, N., Massey, N., Fischer, E., Schleussner, C.-F., Scinocca, J., Seland, 888

Ø., Shiogama, H., Shuckburgh, E., Sparrow, S., Stone, D., Uhe, P., Wallom, D., 889

Wehner, M., Zaaboul, R., 2017. Half a degree additional warming, prognosis and 890

projected impacts (HAPPI): background and experimental design. Geosci. Model 891

Dev., 10, 571–583. 892

Morice, C.P., Kennedy, J.J., Rayner, N.A., Jones, P.D., 2012. Quantifying uncertainties in 893

global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational 894

estimates: The HadCRUT4 dataset. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D08101, doi: 895

10.1029/2011JD017187. 896

Moss, R.H., Edmonds, J.A., Hibbard, K.A., Manning, M.R., Rose, S.K., van Vuuren, D.P., 897

Carter, T.R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G.A., Mitchell, J.F.B., 898

Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S.J., Stouffer, R.J., Thomson, A.M., Weyant, 899

J.P., Wilbanks, T.J., 2010. The next generation of scenarios for climate change 900

research and assessment. Nature, 463(7282), 747–756, doi:10.1038/nature08823. 901

Müller, C., Elliott, J., Chryssanthacopoulos, J., Arneth, A., Balkovič, J., Ciais, P., Deryng, 902

D., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Hoek, S., Iizumi, T., Izaurralde, R.C., Jones, C., 903

Khabarov, N., Lawrence, P., Liu, W., Olin, S., Pugh, T.A.M., Ray, D., Reddy, A., 904

Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A.C., Sakurai, G., Schmid, E., Skalsky, R., Song, C.X., 905

Wang, X., de Wit, A., Yang, H., 2017. Global gridded crop model evaluation: 906

Benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications. Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-907

1422, doi:10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017. 908

O’Leary, G.J., Christy, B., Nuttall, J., Huth, N., Cammarano, D., Stöckle, C., Basso, B., 909

Shcherbak, I., Fitzgerald, G., Luo, Q., Farre-Codina, I., Palta, J., Asseng, S., 2015. 910

Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free-911

Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi-arid 912

environment. Glob. Change Biol., 21, 2670-2686. 913

O’Neill, B.C., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K.L., Hallegatte, S., Cater, T.R., Mathur, R., 914

van Vuuren, D.P., 2014. A new scenario framework for climate change research: 915

the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122, 387–400, 916

doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2. 917

Pendergrass, A.G., Hartmann, D.L., 2014. Changes in the distribution of rain Frequency 918

and intensity in response to global warming. J. Climate 27, 8372-8383, 919

doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00183.1. 920

Pirttioja, N., Carter, T., Fronzek, S., Bindi, M., Hoffmann, H., Palosuo, T., Ruiz-Ramos, 921

M., Tao, F., Acutis, M., Asseng, S., Baranowski, P., Basso, B., Bodin, P., Buis, S., 922

Cammarano, D., Deligios, P., Destain, M.-F., Dumont, B., Ewert, R., Ferrise, R., 923

François, L., Gaiser, T., Hlavinka, P., Jacquemin, I., Kersebaum, K.C., Kollas, C., 924

Krzyszczak, J., Lorite, I.J., Minet, J., Minguez, M.I., Montesino, M., Moriondo, M., 925

Müller, C., Nendel, C., Öztürk, I., Perego, A., Rodríguez, A., Ruane, A.C., Ruget, 926

F., Sanna, M., Semenov, M.A., Slawinski, C., Stratonovitch, P., Supit, I., Waha, 927

K., Wang, E., Wu, L., Zhao, Z., Rötter, R.P., 2015. A crop model ensemble analysis 928

of temperature and precipitation effects on wheat yield across a European transect 929

using impact response surfaces. Clim. Res., 65, 87-105, doi:10.3354/cr01322. 930

Page 37: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

37

Porter, J.R., Xie, L., Challinor, A.J., Cochrane, K., Howden, S.M., Iqbal, M.M., Lobell, 931

D.B., Travasso, M.I., 2014. Food security and food production systems. In: Climate 932

Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral 933

Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the 934

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, 935

D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, 936

Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., 937

Mastrandrea, P.R., White, L.L. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 938

United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 485-533. 939

Ramanathan, V., Chung, C., Kim, D., Bettge, T., Buja, L., Kiehl, J.T., Washington, W.M., 940

Fu, Q., Sikka, D.R., Wild, M., 2005. Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Impacts on South 941

Asian Climate and Hydrological Cycle. PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 15, 5326-5333. 942

Rickards, L., Howden, S.M., 2012. Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate 943

change. Crop & Pasture Science, 2012, 63, 240–250, doi:10.1071/CP11172. 944

Rind, D., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Streets, D., Kahn, R.A., Schwartz, S.E., Yu, H., 2009. 945

Modeling the effects of aerosols on climate, in atmospheric aerosol properties and 946

impacts on climate. In: Aerosol Properties and Their Impacts on Climate, U.S. 947

Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.3 [Chin, M., 948

Kahn, R.A., Schwartz, S.E. (eds.)]. National Aeronautics and Space 949

Administration. 64-97. 950

Rohde, R., Muller, R., Jacobsen, R., Perlmutter, S., Rosenfeld, A., Wurtele, J., Curry, J., 951

Wickham, C., Mosher, S., 2013. Berkeley Earth Temperature Averaging Process. 952

Geoinfor. Geostat: An Overview, 1:2, doi:10.4172/2327-4581.1000103. 953

Rosenzweig, C., Tubiello, F.N., 2007. Adaptation and mitigation strategies in agriculture: 954

an analysis of potential synergies. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change, 12, 855–873, 955

doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9103-8. 956

Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J.W., Hatfield, J.L., Ruane, A.C., Boote, K.J., Thorburn, P., Antle, 957

J.M., Nelson, G.C., Porter, C., Janssen, S., Asseng, S., Basso, B., Ewert, F., 958

Wallach, D., Baigorria, G., Winter, J.M., 2013. The Agricultural Model 959

Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. 960

Agric. Forest Meteorol., 170, 166-182, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011. 961

Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A.C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., Boote, K.J., 962

Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., Neumann, K., Piontek, F., Pugh, T.A.M., 963

Schmid, E., Stehfest, E., Yang, H., Jones, J.W., 2014. Assessing agricultural risks 964

of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model 965

intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, no. 9, 3268-3273, 966

doi:10.1073/pnas.1222463110. 967

Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J.W., Hatfield, J.L., Antle, J.M., Ruane, A.C., Mutter, C.Z., 2015. 968

The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project: Phase I 969

activities by a global community of science. In: The Handbook of Climate Change 970

and Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement 971

Project (AgMIP) [Rosenzweig, C., Hillel, D. (eds.)]. ICP Series on Climate Change 972

Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation, Vol. 3. Imperial College Press, 3-24, 973

doi:10.1142/9781783265640_0001. 974

Rosenzweig, C., Antle, J., Elliott, J., 2016. Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Food 975

Security Worldwide. Eos, 97, doi:10.1029/2016EO047387. 976

Page 38: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

38

Rosenzweig et al., 2018: Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional 977

scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 20160455. 978

doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0455. 979

Ruane, A.C., McDermid, S.P., 2017. Selection of a representative subset of global climate 980

models that captures the profile of regional changes for integrated climate impacts 981

assessment. Earth Perspect., 4, 1, doi:10.1186/s40322-017-0036-4. 982

Ruane, A.C., Major, D.C., Yu, W.H., Alam, M., Hussain, S.G., Khan, A.S., Hassan, A., Al 983

Hossain, B.M.T., Goldberg, R., Horton, R.M., Rosenzweig, C., 2013. Multi-factor 984

impact analysis of agricultural production in Bangladesh with climate change. 985

Glob. Environ. Change A, 23, 336-350, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.09.001. 986

Ruane, A.C., McDermid, S., Rosenzweig, C., Baigorria, G.A., Jones, J.W., Romero, C.C., 987

Cecil, L.D., 2014. Carbon–Temperature–Water change analysis for peanut 988

production under climate change: a prototype for the AgMIP Coordinated Climate-989

Crop Modeling Project (C3MP). Glob. Change Biol., 20, 394–407, doi: 990

10.1111/gcb.12412. 991

Ruane, A.C., R. Goldberg, and J. Chryssanthacopoulos, 2015a: Climate forcing datasets 992

for agricultural modeling: Merged products for gap-filling and historical climate 993

series estimation. Agric. Forest Meteorol., 200, 233-248, 994

doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.016. 995

Ruane, A.C., Winter, J.M., McDermid, S.P., Hudson, N.I., 2015b. AgMIP climate datasets 996

and scenarios for integrated assessment. In: The Handbook of Climate Change and 997

Agroecosystems: The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement 998

Project Integrated Crop and Economic Assessments, Part 1 [Rosenzweig, C., Hillel, 999

D. (eds.)]. ICP Series on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation, Vol. 1000

3. Imperial College Press, 45-78, doi:10.1142/9781783265640_0003. 1001

Ruane, A.C., Rosenzweig, C., Asseng, S., Boote, K.J., Elliott, J., Ewert, F., Jones, J.W., 1002

Martre, P., McDermid, S., Müller, C., Snyder, A., Thorburn, P.J., 2017. An AgMIP 1003

framework for improved agricultural representation in IAMs. Environ. Res. Lett., 1004

in press, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa8da6. 1005

Ruane, A.C., Antle, J., Elliott, J., Folberth, C., Hoogenboom, G., Mason-D’Croz, D., 1006

Müller, C., Porter, C.H., Phillips, M., Raymundo, R., Sands, R., Valdivia, R., 1007

White, J., Wiebe, K., Rosenzweig, C., 2018. Global and Regional Agricultural 1008

Implications of +1.5 and +2.0 °C Warming. Glob. Environ. Change, under review. 1009

Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J.-N., Hollier, C., 2012. Crop losses due to diseases and 1010

their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Sec. 1011

4(2), doi:10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5. 1012

Schleussner et al., 2018: Crop productivity changes at 1.5°C and 2°C under climate 1013

response uncertainty, submitted. 1014

Smith. T.M., Reynolds, R.W., 2008. Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land-1015

ocean surface temperature analysis (1880-2006). J. Climate, 28, 911-930. 1016

SRES, 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, A Special Report of Working Group 1017

III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, 1018

J., Grubler, A., Riahi, K., Roehrl, R.A., Rogner, H.-H., Victor, N.]. 599 pages. 1019

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 1020

Tadross, M., Suarez, P., Lotsch, A., Hachigonta, S., Mdoka, M., Unganai, L., Lucio, F., 1021

Kamdonyo, D., Muchinda, M., 2009. Growing-season rainfall and scenarios of 1022

Page 39: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

39

future change in southeast Africa: implications for cultivating maize. Climate 1023

Research 40:147-169. 1024

Taylor, K.E., Stouffer, R.J., Meehl, G.A., 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment 1025

design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93(4), 485–498, doi:10.1175/BAMSD-11-1026

00094.1. 1027

Tebaldi, C., Arblaster, J.M., 2014. Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an 1028

update on the latest model simulations. Climatic Change, 122, 459, 1029

doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1032-9. 1030

Trenberth, K., 2011. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res., 47, 123–1031

138. doi:10.3354/cr00953. 1032

UNFCCC, 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework 1033

Convention on Climate Change. 32 pages. Available online at: 1034

http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. 1035

van Vuuren, D., van Sluisveld, M., Hof, A.F., 2015. Implications of long-term scenarios 1036

for medium-term targets (2050). PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment 1037

Agency publication number 1871. 30 pages. Available online at: 1038

http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2015-implications-for-1039

long-term-scenarios-for-medium-term-targets-2050_01871.pdf. 1040

Wiebe, K., Lotze-Campen, H., Sands, R., Tabeau, A., van der Mensbrugghe, D., Biewald, 1041

A., Bodirsky, B., Islam, S., Kavallari, A., Mason-D’Croz, D., Müller, C., Popp, A., 1042

Robertson, R., Robinson, S., van Meiji, H., Willenbockel, D., 2015. Climate change 1043

impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and 1044

emissions scenarios, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 085010, doi: 10.1088/1748-1045

9326/10/8/085010. 1046

WMO, 1989. Calculation of Monthly and Annual 30-Year Standard Normals (WCDP928 1047

No.10, WMO-TD/No.341), World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. 1048

Yadav, S.S., Redden, R., Hatfield, J.L., Lotze-Campen, H., Hall, A.J., 2011. Crop 1049

adaptation to climate change. 632 pages. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, United 1050

Kingdom, doi:10.1002/9780470960929. 1051

You, L., Wood-Sichra, U., Fritz, S., Guo, Z., See, L. Koo, J., 2014. Spatial Production 1052

Allocation Model (SPAM) 2005 v2.0. Available online at: http://mapspam.info. 1053

Zhao, C., Liu, B., Piao, S., Wang, X., Lobell, D.B., Huang, Y., Huang, M. Yao, Y., Bassu, 1054

S., Ciais, P., Durand, J.-L., Elliott, J., Ewert, F., Janssens, I.A., Li, T., Lin, E., Liu, 1055

Q., Martre, P., Müller, C., Peng, S., Peñuelas, J., Ruane, A.C., Wallach, D., Wang, 1056

T., Wu, D., Liu, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhu, Z., Asseng, S., 2017. Temperature increase 1057

reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc. Natl. 1058

Acad. Sci., 114, no. 35, 9326-9331, doi:10.1073/pnas.1701762114. 1059

Zhang, H.-M., Huang, B., Lawrimore, J., Menne, M., Smith, T.M., 2017. NOAA Global 1060

Surface Temperature Dataset (NOAAGlobalTemp), Version 4.0 Global Anomalies 1061

and Index Data. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. 1062

doi:10.7289/V5FN144H [accessed March 7, 2017]. 1063

1064

Page 40: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

40

Tables and Figures 1065 Table 1: HAPPI reference and simulation periods. 1066

Climate Period Years [CO2]* Notes

Pre-Industrial** 1861-1880 288 ppm Pre-industrial period with relatively few volcanic

eruptions

Current 2006-2015 390 ppm Based on CMIP historical simulation (coupled models

initiated 100+ years prior; not expected to exactly

match observed interannual variability)

+1.5 ºC World 2106-2115 423 ppm Based on CO2 and sea-surface temperature patterns

from end-of-century RCP2.6 simulations.

+2.0 ºC World 2106-2115 487 ppm Based on CO2 and sea-surface temperature patterns

from end-of-century RCP2.6 and RCP4.5 simulations.

*Current and pre-industrial [CO2] determined from RCP scenarios described by Moss et 1067

al., 2012. 1068

**The Pre-Industrial period was used to determine the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC levels but was 1069

not directly simulated. 1070

1071

Page 41: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

41

Table 2: Global climate model (GCM) ensemble members included in the AgMIP CGRA 1072

study, including initial condition ensembles for multiple models in the a) HAPPI 1073

simulations and b) a multi-model ensemble from CMIP5. For further information on 1074

HAPPI GCMs see Mitchell et al. (2017), and on CMIP5 GCMs see Ruane et al. (2017) and 1075

Flato et al. (2013). Aggregate HAPPI outputs are statistical summaries of broader 1076

ensemble used for mean impacts, while daily outputs included enabled distributional 1077

analysis across all ensemble members. Access date reflects output versions. 1078

a) 1079 Global Climate Model

HAPPI

Current

HAPPI

+1.5 ºC

HAPPI

+2.0 ºC

Horizontal

Resolution (Latitude x

Longitude)

Access

Date

CanAM4 (aggregate) 100 100 100 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 06/2017

CAM4-2degree (aggregate) 500 500 500 1.88˚ x 2.5˚ 06/2017

CAM4-2degree (daily) 20 20 20 0.5˚ x 0.5˚ 09/2017

HadAM3P (aggregate) 94 83 86 1.25˚ x 1.88 06/2017

MIROC5* (aggregate) 160 100 100 1.41˚ x 1.41˚ 06/2017

MIROC5* (daily) 20 20 20 0.5˚ x 0.5˚ 08/2017

NorESM1* (aggregate) 125 125 125 0.94˚ x 1.25˚ 06/2017

NorESM1* (daily) 20 20 20 0.5˚ x 0.5˚ 09/2017

1080

b) CMIP5 GCMs from which Historical and RCP4.5 outputs were analyzed (one 1081

simulation each). 1082 Global Climate

Model

Horizontal

Resolution (Latitude x

Longitude)

Access

Date

Global Climate

Model

Horizontal

Resolution (Latitude x

Longitude)

Access

Date

ACCESS1-0 1.25˚ x 1.88˚ 02/2012 GISS-E2-H 2˚ x 2.5˚ 03/2013

BCC-CSM1-1 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 07/2011 GISS-E2-R 2˚ x 2.5˚ 05/2012

BCC-CSM1-1-m 1.13˚ x 1.13˚ 04/2016 HadGEM2-AO 1.25˚ x 1.88˚ 05/2015

BNU-ESM 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 04/2012 HadGEM2-CC 1.25˚ x 1.88˚ 01/2012

CanESM2 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 04/2011 HadGEM2-ES 1.25˚ x 1.88˚ 01/2011

CCSM4 0.94˚ x 1.25˚ 11/2011 INMCM4.0 1.5˚ x 2˚ 06/2011

CESM1-BGC 0.94˚ x 1.25˚ 03/2012 IPSL-CM5A-LR 1.88˚ x 3.75˚ 06/2011

CMCC-CM 0.75˚ x 0.75˚ 05/2015 IPSL-CM5A-MR 1.27˚ x 2.5˚ 10/2011

CMCC-CMS 1.88˚ x 1.88˚ 05/2015 IPSL-CM5B-LR 1.88˚ x 3.75˚ 05/2015

CNRM-CM5 1.41˚ x 1.41˚ 05/2015 MIROC5 1.41˚ x 1.41˚ 07/2011

CSIRO-Mk3-6-0 1.88˚ x 1.88˚ 04/2012 MIROC-ESM 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 10/2011

EC-Earth 1.13˚ x 1.13˚ 04/2016 MPI-ESM-LR 1.88˚ x 1.88˚ 08/2011

FGOALS-g2 2.81˚ x 2.81˚ 03/2012 MPI-ESM-MR 1.88˚ x 1.88˚ 10/2011

GFDL-CM3 2˚ x 2.5˚ 07/2013 MRI-CGCM3 1.13˚ x 1.13˚ 08/2011

GFDL-ESM2G 2˚ x 2.5˚ 11/2011 NorESM1-M 1.88˚ x 2.5˚ 06/2011

GFDL-ESM2M 2˚ x 2.5˚ 11/2011

Note: * HAPPI versions of MIROC5 and NorESM1 are updated versions of similar 1083

models used for CMIP5. 1084

Page 42: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

42

1085 Figure 1: +1.5 ºC World (a,c,e,g,i) temperature and (b,d,f,h,j) precipitation changes for 1086

(a,b) all land areas and seasons; (c,d) rainfed maize; (e,f) rainfed wheat; (g,h) rainfed rice; 1087

(i,j) rainfed soy. These maps are the basis for estimating local climate change patterns 1088

between the 1995 Climate used by AgMIP protocols and the 2010 climate used by HAPPI. 1089

Hatch marks for temperature indicate that median changes are greater than twice the range 1090

among GCMs, and hatch marks for precipitation indicate agreement on the direction of 1091

change by 4 of the 5 HAPPI models. Grid cells with <10ha rainfed crop area in the SPAM 1092

dataset (You et al., 2014) are omitted to focus on regions with substantial production. 1093

Page 43: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

43

1094 Figure 2: +2.0 ºC World (a,c,e,g,i) temperature and (b,d,f,h,j) precipitation changes for 1095

(a,b) all land areas and seasons; (c,d) rainfed maize; (e,f) rainfed wheat; (g,h) rainfed rice; 1096

(i,j) rainfed soy. Hatch marks and area mask as in Figure 1. 1097

1098

Page 44: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

44

1099 Figure 3: Classes of +1.5 ºC World local (a,c,e,g) temperature and (b,d,f,h) precipitation 1100

change deviations for growing seasons compared to annual changes for (a,b) rainfed maize; 1101

(c,d) rainfed wheat; (e,f) rainfed rice; (g,h) rainfed soy. ‘Substantially’ different indicates 1102

that growing season change differences in at least 3 out of the 5 HAPPI models changed at 1103

a pace that was ‘faster’ or ‘slower’ than 0.2 ºC for temperatures or 5% for precipitation 1104

compared to the annual mean, while ‘Consistently’ different indicates that all 5 HAPPI 1105

GCMs agreed on the sign of difference. Areas that meet both the ‘substantially’ and 1106

‘consistently’ criteria are designated as ‘substantially’ different. Area mask as in Figure 1. 1107

Note that a Figure S3 presents corresponding results for the +2.0 ºC World. 1108

1109

1110

Page 45: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

45

1111 Figure 4: Shifts in extreme conditions for rainfed maize season in +1.5 ºC World. (a) 1112

Change in the frequency of extreme heat years (above 90th percentile in current climate); 1113

(b) change in the frequency of extreme drought years (below 10th percentile in current 1114

climate); (c) additional extreme heat years in the +2.0 C World compared to the +1.5 C 1115

World; (d) additional extreme drought years in the +2.0 C World compared to the 1.5 C 1116

World; (e) change in the skewness of seasonal temperature distribution; (f) change in the 1117

skewness of seasonal precipitation distribution. Hatch marks in (a) and (b) indicate 1118

reduction in frequency of more than ¼ or increases of more than ½. Regions marked as 1119

inconsistent in (e,f) unless 2 of the 3 HAPPI daily GCMs demonstrate substantial shifts in 1120

skewness (percentile change differences greater than 0.1 ºC for temperature and 2% for 1121

precipitation). Area mask as in Figure 1c-d. 1122

1123

Page 46: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

46

1124 Figure 5: +1.5 ºC World HAPPI projected (a,c,e,g) temperature and (b,d,f,h) precipitation 1125

changes, weighted by cropped area within the top 10 producing countries (presented in 1126

descending order from left to right) for (a,b) maize; (c,d) wheat; (e,f) rice; (g,h) soy. 1127

Page 47: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

47

1128 Figure 6: +2.0 ºC World HAPPI projected (a,c,e,g) temperature and (b,d,f,h) precipitation 1129

changes, weighted by cropped area within the top 10 producing countries (presented in 1130

descending order from left to right) for (a,b) maize; (c,d) wheat; (e,f) rice; (g,h) soy. 1131

Page 48: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

48

1132 Figure 7: HAPPI and CMIP5 RCP4.5 (a) temperature changes and (b) precipitation 1133

changes for annual conditions across all land areas as well as maize, wheat, rice, and soy 1134

seasons weighted according to cropped area. Symbols represent HAPPI simulations, while 1135

box-and-whisker diagrams indicate CMIP5 median projections and their interquartile 1136

range, while whiskers extend to the last point within an additional 1.5 times the 1137

interquartile range. 1138

1139

1140 1141

Page 49: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

49

Climate Shifts for Major Agricultural Seasons in +1.5 and +2.0 °C Worlds: HAPPI 1142

Projections and AgMIP Modeling Scenarios 1143 1144

Alex C. Ruane1 1145

Meridel M. Phillips2,1 1146

Cynthia Rosenzweig1 1147

1148 1NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA 1149

2Columbia University Center for Climate Systems Research, New York, NY, USA 1150

1151

Corresponding Author: 1152

Alex Ruane 1153

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 1154

2880 Broadway 1155

New York, NY 10025 1156

[email protected] 1157

1158

Page 50: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

50

S1. Brief summary of the HAPPI Tier 1 simulation approach (see further details in 1159

Mitchell et al., 2017): 1160

HAPPI defines the pre-industrial period as 1861-1880, a 20 year climatology with 1161

little long-term global trend that is also largely devoid of major volcanic eruptions. 1162

Simulations of the 2006-2015 current period climate utilized SSTs provided by 1163

RCP8.5 considering its closest match with observations in this period. Global mean 1164

temperature for this current period is 0.92 ºC above pre-industrial conditions, and 1165

thus we would expect the +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds to be only 0.58 ºC and 1.08 ºC 1166

warmer than current conditions, respectively. 1167

All driving conditions for the +1.5 ºC World were drawn from the lowest emissions 1168

representative concentration pathway RCP2.6 (Moss et al., 2010) end-of-century 1169

(2091-2100) period as the corresponding CMIP5 ensemble averaged 1.55 ºC over 1170

pre-industrial conditions. Note that this does not guarantee that each GCM 1171

produces exactly +1.5C global warming, rather the experiment is designed so that 1172

it is probable that the multi-model ensemble represents the +1.5 ºC World. RCP2.6 1173

also contains substantial reductions in tropospheric aerosols under an assumption 1174

of increased regulation toward the end of the 21st century, with skies particularly 1175

clearer over South and East Asia. 1176

The +2.0 ºC World was created from a weighted average of driving conditions from 1177

the RCP2.6 and RCP4.5 end-of-century scenarios, as the corresponding CMIP5 1178

ensemble of both RCPs averaged ~2.0 ºC global warming. For this scenario HAPPI 1179

derived only new core driving conditions (CO2, sea surface temperatures (SSTs), 1180

Page 51: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

51

sea ice, and natural forcings); all others (including aerosol concentrations) were 1181

held to be the same as the +1.5 ºC World to isolate the effects of core forcings. 1182

SSTs in both future worlds were modified to impose mean changes from end-of-1183

century simulations on top of the SSTs used in the 2006-2015 simulation. 1184

Large (83-500 member) initial condition ensembles were conducted using 1185

atmosphere-only model versions for current and future worlds to more broadly 1186

capture changes in internal variability and extreme events. Given that these 10-1187

year simulations are on a similar time scale to some major modes of variability 1188

(such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation), it is possible that initial conditions or the 1189

imposition of mean SST changes from the end of the century could over-represent 1190

particular phases of natural variability. 1191

HAPPI recommends CO2 concentrations of 423 ppm (1.5 ºC World) and 487 ppm 1192

(2.0 ºC World). The exact CO2 level at which a global climate model (GCM) will 1193

settle into a given stabilization temperature is related to its equilibrium climate 1194

sensitivity (which varies considerably across models; Flato et al., 2013); however, 1195

HAPPI aims to focus applications on the emergent patterns of regional climate 1196

change and shifts in the distribution of extreme events. As a key component of 1197

photosynthesis and stomatal gas transfer in plants, the selection of CO2 1198

concentration introduces further uncertainties (Rosenzweig et al., 2014; Deryng et 1199

al., 2016; Ruane et al., 2018). 1200

1201

Page 52: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

52

1202 Figure S1: CO2 concentrations for current period and +1.5 and +2.0 ºC Worlds. HAPPI 1203

CO2 concentrations presented as gray dashed line for ‘current’ period (year 2010 = 390 1204

ppm) and black boxes for the +1.5 and +2.0C Worlds (423 ppm and 487 ppm, respectively). 1205

Crossing point CO2 concentrations in the CMIP5 RCP4.5 transient ensemble simulations 1206

are presented as box-and-whisker diagrams (indicating median, interquartile range, and 1207

whiskers extending to the last point within an additional 1.5 times the interquartile range). 1208

1209

Page 53: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

53

1210 Figure S2: Middle day of growing season (between planting and harvesting dates in the 1211

AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison) for (a) rainfed maize; (b) rainfed 1212

wheat; (c) rainfed rice; (d) rainfed soy. 1213

1214

Page 54: Climate Shifts within Major Agricultural Seasons for +1.5 ... · 96 scenarios on agriculture and food security (Rosenzweig et al., 2016, 2018). CGRA analyses 97 of the +1.5 and +2.0

54

1215 Figure S3: Classes of +2.0 ºC World local (a,c,e,g) temperature and (b,d,f,h) precipitation 1216

change deviations for growing seasons compared to annual changes for (a,b) rainfed maize; 1217

(c,d) rainfed wheat; (e,f) rainfed rice; (g,h) rainfed soy. ‘Substantially’ different indicates 1218

that growing season differences in at least 3 out of the 5 HAPPI models exceeded 0.2 ºC 1219

for temperatures or 5% for precipitation compared to the annual mean, while ‘Consistently’ 1220

different indicates that all 5 HAPPI GCMs agreed on the sign of difference. Area mask as 1221

in Figure 1. Note that the corresponding +1.5 C World analysis is presented in Figure 3. 1222

1223