classroom and class lab utilization study update...university of west georgia classroom and class...

Classroom and Class Lab Utilization Study Update Fall 2014/Spring 2015

Prepared by Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc.

Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc. June 2015 1

Table of Contents

Project Overview ................................................................................................................................... 3

Classroom Utilization: Executive Summary .......................................................................................... 3

Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 3

Findings Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4

Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 5

Terms and Classroom Summary ........................................................................................................... 6

Time by Day Distribution ...................................................................................................................... 7

Classroom Utilization ............................................................................................................................ 9

Classroom Needs ................................................................................................................................ 12

Class Lab Utilization ............................................................................................................................ 18

Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 18

Class Lab Utilization: Campus Summary ............................................................................................. 19

Class Lab Utilization by Department/Program ................................................................................... 20

Art Studios ...................................................................................................................................... 20

Biology ............................................................................................................................................ 22

Chemistry ........................................................................................................................................ 23

Geosciences..................................................................................................................................... 24

Physics ............................................................................................................................................ 24

Music Studios.................................................................................................................................. 25

Computer Science ........................................................................................................................... 26

College of Education....................................................................................................................... 27

Leadership and Instruction .............................................................................................................. 28

Mass Communications .................................................................................................................... 28

Speech ............................................................................................................................................. 29

Theater Studios ............................................................................................................................... 30

Appendix A: Classroom Listing ............................................................................................................ 31

Appendix B: Classrooms With No Usage ............................................................................................ 33

Appendix C: Class Lab Utilization Details ........................................................................................... 34


List of Tables

Table 1: Classroom Summary ...............................................................................................................................6

Table 2: Time By Day: All Day (98 Classrooms-Fall 2014) ....................................................................................7

Table 3: Time By Day Percentages: 8am to 5pm Fall 2014 ..................................................................................8

Table 4: Time Blocks: Fall 2014 ............................................................................................................................9

Table 5: Classroom Standards ........................................................................................................................... 10

Table 6: Classroom Utilization: Summary (Fall 2014) ....................................................................................... 10

Table 7: Classroom Utilization by Building (Fall 2014) ...................................................................................... 11

Table 8: Classroom Utilization by Size (Fall 2014) ............................................................................................ 12

Table 9: Classroom Needs Summary ................................................................................................................ 12

Table 10: USG Metric Needs ............................................................................................................................. 13

Table 11: Classroom Needs Detail: (9am to 5pm, 25.6 WRH Expected)........................................................... 14

Table 12: Classroom Needs Detail: By College (25.6 WRH Expected, 9am-5pm, 40 hours available) ............. 15

Table 13: Room Size Versus Class Size .............................................................................................................. 15

Table 14: USG Classroom Graph-Fall 2014 ....................................................................................................... 16

Table 15: Maximize Classrooms ........................................................................................................................ 16

Table 16: Class Lab Utilization Summary .......................................................................................................... 19

Table 17: Art Studio Utilization ......................................................................................................................... 20

Table 18: Biology Lab Utilization ....................................................................................................................... 22

Table 19: Chemistry Lab Utilization .................................................................................................................. 23

Table 20: Geology Lab Utilization ..................................................................................................................... 24

Table 21: Physics Lab Utilization ....................................................................................................................... 24

Table 22: Music Studio Utilization .................................................................................................................... 25

Table 23: Computer Science Lab Utilization ..................................................................................................... 26

Table 24: College of Education Lab Utilization ................................................................................................. 27

Table 25: Leadership and Instruction Lab Utilization ....................................................................................... 28

Table 26: Mass Communications Lab Utilization .............................................................................................. 28

Table 27: Speech Lab Utilization ....................................................................................................................... 29

Table 28: Theater Studio Utilization ................................................................................................................. 30

University of West Georgia Classroom and Class Lab Utilization Study Update


Project Overview The University of West Georgia retained the services of Comprehensive Facilities Planning, Inc. (CFP) to update the

utilization assessment of classrooms and class labs located on the Carrollton campus. Since the Fall 2011 semester, a

detailed analysis of the utilization patterns for the instructional rooms has been completed to assist the University with

tracking and developing trend data regarding the use of these spaces. Classroom utilization has been updated each

year since, however the utilization analysis for class labs is new to this year. This current classroom update is based on

the Fall 2014 semester utilization data. The class labs have been evaluated for both Fall 2014 and Spring 2015

semesters, in order to develop a more comprehensive profile of these rooms as some labs are only used for a single

term. In addition to determining trends, the assessment for classrooms includes a comparative analysis using the USG

metrics established in 2012. Note: similar metrics for class labs were not established.

In addition, the results from this assessment are being applied to develop a relocation plan for the programs and

occupants of the Biology Building while the building undergoes a major renovation.

The process used for this update and a summary of findings and results are presented in the following pages.

Classroom Utilization: Executive Summary

Overview

This section presents the assessment of the Carrollton Campus’ existing classrooms used for scheduled instruction. The

following purposes for this assessment have been identified:

1. Examine the utilization of classrooms from the Fall 2014 class file

2. Compare the Fall 2014 classroom supply and utilization to typical guidelines and the USG classroom metric to

determine classroom need.

3. Evaluate the progression of utilization over the past four years of analysis to identify trends in use to help

inform management decisions regarding classroom scheduling practices and needs.

To help determine if an institution has the correct number of classrooms, seats, and square footage allocated to their

classroom supply, several key utilization expectations and metrics are used:

Average Weekly Room Hours (Avg. WRH): The first metric, Average Weekly Room Hours, is the average

number of hours that classrooms are scheduled per week. Classroom guidelines suggest that these rooms

should be used 60%-70% of available hours with 70% considered maximum capacity. The actual Avg. WRH is

compared to this guideline to measure how efficiently the rooms are currently scheduled and to determine

the correct number of classrooms.

Station Occupancy (SO): The second metric, Station Occupancy, is a measurement of how many seats are

filled while a room is in use. Classroom guidelines suggest that on average 67% of a classrooms seats should

be filled. The actual SO is compared to the SO goal to get an overall picture of how well the seats are utilized.

Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH): WSCH, or instructional demand, is the scheduled face time a student

spends in class multiplied by the number of students enrolled in the class. By using the total WSCH, and the

goals set for Avg. WRH and SO, the number of seats needed to fulfill instructional demand are computed.



WSCH are also used for the USG classroom metric. This calculation uses all WSCH (i.e., includes weekend

hours) scheduled in classrooms.

Assignable Square Feet per seat (ASF/Seat): Classroom guidelines suggest 20 square feet should be allocated

per student station or seat. This guideline is an average that allows for a variety of classroom seating

configurations from a lecture hall, that typically requires less square feet per station, to a computer classroom

or a collaborative learning classroom which typically require more square feet per station. An institution’s

total square footage need is calculated by multiplying the number of seats required times the square foot per

seat goal.

Findings Summary

1. Classroom Supply: 98 Classrooms had scheduled usage for Fall 2014. The study also identified 6 rooms classified as classrooms but have no scheduled use.

2. Distribution of Class Hours: There is an excellent distribution of classes throughout the hours of the day from 9am till 5pm. The 8am time slots have relatively little use with 68 class hours scheduled at 8am compared to the 192 at 9am. The peak was 316 hours scheduled at 11am. However, classes are scheduled well throughout the afternoon. Therefore, this report will calculate classroom utilization and needs for both the 8am-5pm and 9am-5pm time frame.

3. Utilization: Classroom guidelines suggest classrooms should be used 60%-70% of available hours with 70% considered maximum capacity. This guideline helps to ensure the correct number of rooms and square feet are allocated for classrooms. UWG’s classroom demand is driven by the daytime hours. The evening programs peak use is just over half of the daytime peak in demand on classrooms. Therefore, the daytime timeframes of 8am-5pm and 9am-5pm were used, generating 45 and 40 available hours respectively. In applying the 60%-70% utilization guideline, classrooms are expect to be used on average between 27-31.5 hours per week. An Average WRH (Weekly Room Hours) of 28.5 out of 45 hours available, or 64% usage, is considered solid utilization and applied in this analysis.

a. The current supply of 98 classrooms are utilized at 22.3 Average Weekly Room Hours (WRH - average number of hours classrooms are scheduled Monday thru Friday from 8am to 5pm, or 45 total available hours) or 49.5% usage. As compared to typical guidelines which range from 27 to 31.5 WRH for daytime usage, these results put UWG classroom utilization 4.7 hours less than the guideline.

b. As noted, 8am classes are rare and constitute only 3.1% of class meeting times as compared to the 11am peak of 14.5%. Further, 4pm has a relatively high rate of 10.9%. This finding suggests that a more suitable timeframe for measuring classroom demand at UWG would be to use a 9am to 5pm timeframe (40 available hours) which yields a goal of 25.6 Average WRH (64%).

c. The 49 ‘shared’ classrooms (shared usage by CAH, CSM, and CSS) are utilized at 28.0 Average WRH which is considered good utilization with some room left before a maximum capacity of 31.5 hours is met.

d. The 49 ‘non-shared’ classrooms are utilized at 16.6 Average WRH which indicates there may be a surplus of classrooms or the potential for enrollment growth in these rooms. However, some of the ‘non-shared’ rooms have excellent utilization. For example, the seven classrooms in Richards College of Business are used an average of 29 WRH. Rooms such as the nine in the Biology building, are only used at 15.3 Average WRH, the five Nursing classrooms only reporting 8.8 Average WRH, and three in the Education Annex showing no usage during the day, reduce the overall utilization.

4. Station Occupancy: Guidelines suggest, on average, seats in classrooms should be filled to 67% of capacity. This goal allows flexibility in sizes of rooms while efficiently using square feet.

a. Station Occupancy (SO) of 72.8% for the 98 classrooms is above the guideline of 67%. These rates indicate that seats are well filled and the sizes of classrooms fit the sizes of classes.



5. Classroom Needs: Classroom needs are calculated using a goal of 67% Station Occupancy and 28.5 Avg. WRH for the 8am- 5pm timeframe and 25.6 for the 9am-5pm timeframe. These Avg. WRH goal represent 64% utilization of available hours. The SO and Avg. WRH goals determine the number of rooms and seats required to meet classroom demand. An average of 20 square foot per seat is then used to calculate the square footage requirements needed to meet current instructional demand for classrooms. This model is a valuable tool for future planning as it provides the number of rooms, sizes of rooms, seats, and square feet that would optimize utilization of the space.

a. The 8am-5pm calculation resulted in a need of 77 classrooms, 4,232 seats, and 84,631 square feet compared to the current supply of 98 classrooms, 4,970 seats, and 89,782 square feet.

b. The 9am-5pm calculation resulted in a need of 83 classrooms, 4,554 seats, and 91,075 square feet compared to the current supply of 98 classrooms, 4,970 seats, and 89,782 square feet.

c. If desirable, some of the least desirable or least used rooms could be re-purposed. The corollary to removing some rooms is that these excess rooms provide an opportunity for some enrollment growth.

6. USG Classroom Metric: The USG metric does not look at a timeframe. It considers all hours scheduled including weekends. The USG Classroom metric is calculated by dividing the Weekly Student Contact Hours by the product of total seats and a Weekly Room Hour goal of 40 ((enrollments x hours in class) / (total seats x 40)). USG sets the acceptable range for room utilization of .5 to .7 for the metric.

a. UWG’s metric was calculated to be .412 for the 98 classrooms reported, which is slightly below the USG’s acceptable range. The 49 shared classrooms had a bit higher utilization result of .487.

b. To improve the classroom metric, a reduction in seats, increase in Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH), or a combination of both is required. To reach a .5 metric (the minimum bar) would require a reduction of 890 seats or an increase of 17,502 WSCH (21.4% enrollment growth).

c. Overall, to reach the USG range for classroom utilization would require more Weekly Student Contact Hours (i.e., more students and courses) during the evening and weekend. Since USG set a WRH goal of 40, evening and possibly weekend programming is required.

7. Classroom Trends: The table below shows classroom trends for the past four years. Please note that the computer classrooms that were included in the Fall 2011 study have been removed from the table since they are now classified under the lab categories for the USG metrics starting Fall 2012. The Nursing building also added 8,215 classroom square feet (ASF) for Fall 2013.

8am-5pm

Term Rooms Capacity ASF Avg. WRH SO USG Metric

Fall 2014 Total 98 4,970 89,782 22.3 72.8% 0.410

Fall 2013 Total 98 4,867 93,240 23.6 72.5% 0.426

Fall 2012 Total 95 4,652 83,019 23.9 74.1% 0.448

Fall 2011 Total 99 4,841 89,621 21.2 77.9% 0.420

Conclusions

UWG has a good distribution of classrooms sizes to meet its instructional demand. Many of the classrooms have

excellent utilization, however, there are pockets of rooms with very low usage which cause the overall utilization to fall

below expectations (e.g., Nursing, Education Annex, Coliseum, etc.).



The 6 rooms with no usage (see appendix B) should be investigated to determine the actual functional use of these

rooms.

Terms and Classroom Summary

Terms Used in this study

WRH Weekly Room Hours – Total hours a room is scheduled per week.

Avg. WRH Average WRH – Average of hours scheduled per week.

SO Station Occupancy – How well seats are filled while a room is in use. There are times when SO may exceed 100%. This is caused by enrollments in a class exceeding the capacity of the room.

ASF Assignable Square Feet

WSCH Weekly Student Contact Hours (Hours in class times students)

CAH College of Arts and Humanities

COE College of Education

CSM College of Science and Math

CSS College of Social Sciences

NURS School of Nursing

RCB Richards College of Business

VPAA Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs (Interdisciplinary subjects)

Table 1: Classroom Summary

College Name College Abbrev. Rooms Capacity ASF ASF/Seat

College of Arts and Humanities CAH 21 812 14,908 18.4

College of Education COE 19 739 17,855 24.2

College of Science and Math CSM 22 1,545 23,719 15.4

College of Social Sciences CSS 20 932 15,241 16.4

School of Nursing NURS 5 296 7,178 24.3

Richards College of Business RCB 11 646 10,881 16.8

Fall 2014 Total 98 4,970 89,782 18.1

Fall 2013 Total 98 4,867 93,240 19.2

Fall 2012 Total 95 4,652 83,019 17.8

Fall 2011 Total 107 5,167 95,490 18.5

Classrooms with No Use 6 390 12,318

1. The Classroom Summary table shows the supply of classrooms used for Fall 2014 and reported as USG Room

Use Code 110 -Classrooms for the USG classroom metric calculation. These rooms will be used in this study as

a basis for demand, current utilization rates, and time distribution.

2. Changes in supply from 2013 to 2014 included capacity and ASF (square feet) changes to some of the

classrooms as well as the addition and removal of classrooms. The total number of scheduled rooms was 98



for both 2013 and 2014. However, of the 104 total available rooms in 2014, six of the rooms didn’t have any

usage associated with them.

3. Note: The Fall 2011 study included 8 computer classrooms (249 seats, 6,224 ASF) which are now grouped in the USG laboratory metric and are therefore not included in studies after Fall 2011.

4. Note: There are six rooms listed as classrooms but have no scheduled usage. These rooms are listed in Appendix B.

Time by Day Distribution

Tables in this section illustrate how class hours are currently distributed across days and times. This section helps to identify the normal hours of operation to use for utilization and classroom needs purposes and to show how well classes are distributed through the hours and days to maximize utilization of the available rooms.

The hours shown in the Time by Day tables are calculated by summing all individual class hours including class change times. Based on the beginning and end times, the summarized hours for all classes are then distributed into the appropriate bars for the bar chart. For example, a class that meets MWF from 9am to 9:52am will contribute one hour to 9am on MWF. A class that meets TR from 9:30am to 10:50am would contribute ½ hour to 9am on TR and 1 hour to 10am on TR.

Maximum % refers to 86% of the total rooms available. This typically represents the point where classroom demand exceeds the supply. Inefficiencies caused by variant class times, single day classes, undesirable classrooms, etc., drops the 86% Maximum below the available rooms.

Table 2: Time By Day: All Day (98 Classrooms-Fall 2014)

5. The Time By Day table shows hours of classes meeting in classrooms from 8am through 10pm. This graph illustrates an overall picture of how classes are scheduled.



6. The distribution of classes shows that UWG classroom demand is driven by the daytime hours. Distribution of classes is quite good from 9am through to 5pm.

7. 8am usage is minimal. Friday, at best, is half the use of the other days during the morning and reduces to zero usage during the evening.

8. The Max % line is not achieved at any hour or day, indicating a surplus of rooms even during the peak times.

Table 3: Time By Day Percentages: 8am to 5pm Fall 2014

Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Hour Tot Hour %

8am 14.5 15.5 16.5 14.5 7.0 68.0 3.1%

9am 45.7 37.6 47.7 38.0 23.1 192.1 8.8%

10am 66.5 61.7 67.4 63.1 30.5 289.2 13.2%

11am 72.3 72.1 72.3 67.4 32.8 316.9 14.5%

12pm 57.5 66.4 56.7 65.1 17.6 263.3 12.0%

1pm 55.9 66.6 55.2 65.7 18.0 261.4 12.0%

2pm 70.3 70.1 69.7 70.6 12.5 293.1 13.4%

3pm 63.6 65.2 64.5 66.8 5.4 265.5 12.1%

4pm 57.6 57.8 61.0 59.6 2.1 238.0 10.9%

Day Total 503.9 512.8 511.0 510.8 149.0 2,187.4 100.0%

Day Percent 23.0% 23.4% 23.4% 23.4% 6.8% 100.0%

*WRH – Cells are WRH (Class hours) plus class change time

9. The Time by Day Percentage table shows the distribution of classes for Fall 2014 daytime to provide a comparative measure against some “best practice” policies.

10. In order to maximize classroom usage many universities have established distribution policies. Some of the more successful are:

a. No more than 12.5% of classes should be scheduled at any given hour during the time of room scheduling. This policy ensures an equal distribution of classes at the time rooms are scheduled. It is accepted that some of the classes will be cancelled and therefore, a 13.5% rate at census date is acceptable.

b. At least 15% of class meetings on Friday.

11. The acceptable rate of 13.5% (acceptable rate at census date) at any given hour is only exceeded at 11am. The peak of 14.5% at 11am is the result of a surplus of classrooms available.

12. Friday usage of 6.9% falls short of the policy of 15% on Friday. 13. While 8am usage is minimal, a rate of 10.9% at 4pm is exceptional which partially compensates for the lack of

8am usage. 14. This chart shows how UWG is almost exclusively operating on a 9am to 5pm daytime schedule which will

affect the determination of classroom needs.



Table 4: Time Blocks: Fall 2014

Desc Time Begin Time End Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri WRH Sections

MW 800 920 M W 16.0 6

MW 930 1050 M W 93.4 35

MW 1100 1220 M W 90.8 34

MW 1230 1350 M W 98.8 37

MW 1400 1520 M W 144.2 54

MW 1530 1650 M W 112.1 42

MWF 800 852 M W F 7.8 3

MWF 900 952 M W F 46.8 18

MWF 1000 1052 M W F 59.8 23

MWF 1100 1152 M W F 67.6 26

MWF 1200 1252 M W F 39.0 15

MWF 1300 1352 M W F 28.6 11

MWF 1400 1452 M W F 7.8 3

MWF 1500 1552 M W F 5.2 2

MWF 1600 1652 M W F 5.2 2

TR 800 920 T R 24.0 9

TR 930 1050 T R 138.8 52

TR 1100 1220 T R 146.8 55

TR 1230 1350 T R 141.5 53

TR 1400 1520 T R 138.8 52

TR 1530 1650 T R 109.5 41

15. The Time Block table shows the WRH’s and number of sections meeting during the standard time blocks. This

is a supplement to the Time by Day graphic to show details for the MW, MWF, and TR class patterns. The conclusions (e.g., low 8am and Friday usage) are the same as presented in the previous two tables.

Classroom Utilization

Classroom utilization examines the number of hours classrooms are used during a week and how many seats are filled

while the room is in use. Actual usage is compared against guidelines to help determine how well the classroom supply

is meeting instructional demand. For example, if the Avg. WRH is below the recommended guideline this indicates a

surplus of classrooms.

Daytime 8am-5pm, Daytime 9am-5pm, Monday through Friday: This method most accurately measures institutions, such as UWG, where the daytime Monday through Friday hours’ drive the classroom need. This method considers two factors: Weekly Room Hours (WRH) and Station Occupancy (SO). For the WRH measurement, typical state guidelines suggest classroom utilization rates should fall between 60% and 70% of the available hours where 70% is considered maximum capacity. In order to look at daytime versus all day, these percentages need to be applied to a time frame. Defining daytime use as taking the available 45 hours (8am to 5pm, M-F, daytime) multiplied by guideline values, yields an expectation of 27 (60%) to 31.5 (70%) Average WRH (i.e., on average classrooms should be used between 27 to 31.5 hours per week). This calculation also includes class change times so that a 50 minute class will be counted as one hour. Station Occupancy, a measurement of how many seats are filled while a room is in use, is the second measurement for this method.



o Dependent on the institutions scheduling practices adjustments to the time frame, or hours available, may be made to reflect the local culture. These adjustments are then made to expected goals to determine classroom needs. Since the 8am hour has such low usage this study will also use a 40 hour (9am to 5pm, M-F, daytime) timeframe. Multiplied by guideline values, this modified instructional day yields an expectation of 24 (60%) to 28 (70%) Average WRH.

USG Classroom Metric: The USG metric uses all hours scheduled regardless of time or day (i.e., evening classes and weekend classes are included). The formula is Weekly Student Contacts Hours divided by the product of the capacity of all rooms times the expected Weekly Room Hour goal: WSCH / (Seats * 40). This calculation ignores class change times so a 50 minute class is 5/6th of an hour. USG’s metric range for ‘good’ utilization is .5 to .7 for this calculation.

Table 5: Classroom Standards

Daytime: 8am-5pm Daytime: 9am-5pm USG Metric

Hours Avg. % Hours Avg. %

Expected

Avail WRH WRH Avail WRH WRH SO WSCH WRH Seats Metric

45 27.0-31.5 60%-70% 40 24.0-28.0 60%-70% 67% All 40 All .5-.7

Note: Standards used to compare to current utilization rates

Table 6: Classroom Utilization: Summary (Fall 2014) Daytime 8am to 5m 9am-5pm USG Metric

Building Rooms WRH Avg. WRH % WRH SO% % WRH Seats WSCH Metric

Adamson 4 92.0 23.0 51.1% 69.1% 55.0% 219 4,014.3 0.46

Anthropology 3 71.4 23.8 52.9% 64.2% 59.5% 180 2,507.9 0.35

Biology 9 137.7 15.3 34.0% 85.1% 37.4% 465 6,189.4 0.33

Boyd 8 245.0 30.6 68.0% 82.5% 70.8% 402 9,852.0 0.61

Callaway 1 26.0 26.0 57.8% 68.1% 65.0% 63 1,138.9 0.45

Callaway Annex 2 63.5 31.8 70.6% 74.3% 79.4% 126 2,602.6 0.52

Cobb 1 9.0 9.0 20.0% 81.0% 22.5% 14 90.8 0.16

Coliseum 6 61.6 10.3 22.8% 67.2% 24.0% 248 2,005.6 0.20

Education Annex 3 - - 0.0% 0.0% 58 150.0 0.06

Education Center 9 178.6 19.8 44.1% 59.3% 46.6% 433 6,075.2 0.35

Humanities 13 294.9 22.7 50.4% 72.8% 56.5% 452 7,173.2 0.40

Melson 4 77.1 19.3 42.8% 70.3% 48.2% 93 1,397.0 0.38

Nursing 4 35.2 8.8 19.5% 65.2% 22.0% 296 1,566.2 0.13

RCOB 7 203.2 29.0 64.5% 61.0% 69.0% 427 7,719.6 0.45

Social Sciences 16 495.0 30.9 68.8% 71.4% 75.6% 707 15,465.7 0.55

Tech Learn 8 199.2 24.9 55.3% 70.3% 60.4% 787 13,899.5 0.44

Totals 98 2,189.1 22.3 49.6% 72.8% 54.1% 4,970 81,847.8 0.41

*Guidelines for Average WRH: 27 to 31.5, USG Metric: .5 to .7

16. Overall daytime utilization of 22.3 Avg. WRH for the 98 classrooms is below the 27-31.5 WRH guideline range, indicating a surplus of classrooms.

17. The 49 shared classrooms are at 28.0 Avg. WRH which is within acceptable guidelines



18. Daytime Station Occupancy (SO) of 72.8% for the 98 classrooms is above the guideline of 67%. These rates show that seats are well used and that the sizes of classrooms are well distributed to meet demand.

19. The USG metric for the 98 classrooms, at .412 is below the acceptable range of .5 to .7 set by the state. The 49 shared classrooms are at the lower end of the expected range. This shows while the 49 shared rooms are used quite well during the 8am to 5pm hours, there is not enough evening or weekend hours scheduled at UWG to raise the utilization rates much above the minimum set by USG. The 5pm to 10pm time frame yields only 4.0 Avg. WRH which is not enough to increase the total WRH to the USG WRH Goal of 40.

20. The trend from Fall 2012 through Fall 2014 shows a slight drop in Avg. WRH. This drop is caused by a decrease in the total WRH scheduled in the classrooms.

Table 7: Classroom Utilization by Building (Fall 2014) Daytime 8am to 5pm USG Metric

Building Rooms WRH Avg. WRH % WRH SO% Seats WSCH Metric

Adamson 4 92.0 23.0 51.1% 69.1% 219 4,014.3 0.46

Anthropology 3 71.4 23.8 52.9% 64.2% 180 2,507.9 0.35

Biology 9 137.7 15.3 34.0% 85.1% 465 6,189.4 0.33

Boyd 8 245.0 30.6 68.0% 82.5% 402 9,852.0 0.61

Callaway 1 26.0 26.0 57.8% 68.1% 63 1,138.9 0.45

Callaway Annex 2 63.5 31.8 70.6% 74.3% 126 2,602.6 0.52

Cobb 1 9.0 9.0 20.0% 81.0% 14 90.8 0.16

Coliseum 6 61.6 10.3 22.8% 67.2% 248 2,005.6 0.20

Education Annex 3 - - 0.0% 58 150.0 0.06

Education Center 9 178.6 19.8 44.1% 59.3% 433 6,075.2 0.35

Humanities 13 294.9 22.7 50.4% 72.8% 452 7,173.2 0.40

Melson 4 77.1 19.3 42.8% 70.3% 93 1,397.0 0.38

Nursing 4 35.2 8.8 19.5% 65.2% 296 1,566.2 0.13

RCOB 7 203.2 29.0 64.5% 61.0% 427 7,719.6 0.45

Social Sciences 16 495.0 30.9 68.8% 71.4% 707 15,465.7 0.55

Tech Learning Center 8 199.2 24.9 55.3% 70.3% 787 13,899.5 0.44

Totals 98 2,189.1 22.3 49.6% 72.8% 4,970 81,847.8 0.41

* Guidelines for Average WRH: 27 to 31.5, USG Metric: .5 to .7

21. The Classroom Utilization by Building table shows the distribution of classrooms around the campus and how well each building is utilized.

22. This table identifies where there is underutilized space or, perhaps non-reported usage. Also of note are the three rooms in the Education Annex which didn’t report any usage during the day, but were included since there are some evening hours and WSCH which are included in the USG metric. These three rooms, listed in appendix A, should be investigated to determine their actual function.



Table 8: Classroom Utilization by Size (Fall 2014) Daytime 8am-5pm USG Metric

Size Rooms WRH Avg. WRH % WRH SO %

Min WRH Max WRH Seats WSCH Metric

1-19 9 91.8 10.2 22.7% 54.9% - 21.0 138 1,231 0.22

20-29 17 372.9 21.9 48.7% 76.6% - 34.8 437 7,489 0.43

30-39 26 559.3 21.5 47.8% 68.9% - 36.5 901 14,357 0.40

40-59 22 525.8 23.9 53.1% 69.2% 6.1 36.5 1,008 17,346 0.43

60-79 10 253.0 25.3 56.2% 57.1% 13.0 33.7 699 10,972 0.39

80-99 6 157.5 26.3 58.3% 61.9% 6.0 33.3 531 8,682 0.41

100-149 5 133.1 26.6 59.1% 63.0% 15.0 38.9 608 10,744 0.44

150-249 2 66.8 33.4 74.2% 60.6% 31.2 35.6 355 7,019 0.49

>=250 1 29.0 29.0 64.5% 46.1% 29.0 29.0 293 4,007 0.34

Totals 98 2,189.1 22.3 49.6% 72.8% 4,970 81,848 0.41

* Guidelines for Average WRH: 27 to 31.5, USG Metric: .5 to .7

23. The Classroom Utilization by Size table shows the distribution of classrooms by the sizes of rooms and how well each size range is utilized. The Min and Max WRH columns show in each size range the least and most used room (see the room list in the appendix for individual rooms).

24. The smallest rooms, 1-19 seats, have the lowest Average WRH usage, which is typical since class maximum enrollment limits are not usually set low enough to fully utilize these rooms.

Classroom Needs

This section calculates and recommends how many rooms, seats, and ASF (Assignable Square Feet) are needed at

the institution based on the current instructional demand (WSCH-Weekly Student Contact Hours) for classrooms.

The calculations are done using the established goals for Average Weekly Room Hours (Avg. WRH), Station

Occupancy (SO), and Assignable Square Feet per Station (ASF/Seat). A second calculation is done to estimate the

enrollment growth potential with the current supply of classrooms.

Rooms: The total WRH is divided by the expected WRH utilization goals to determine how many classrooms

are needed. The calculation is performed for a daytime standard 8am to 5pm timeframe. The calculation also

is done for a 9am to 5pm schedule since the time by day section of this report shows that UWG largely

operates on a 9am to 5pm daytime schedule.

Seats: The WSCH is divided by the product of the SO Goal (67%) multiplied by the WRH Goal. The result is an

estimation of how many total seats are needed to accommodate the current mix of the sizes of classes taught.

ASF: The seat calculation is multiplied by 20 (an average ASF per seat goal). The result is an estimated total

square feet needed to support classroom activity.

Table 9: Classroom Needs Summary

Potential Factors Used

WRH WSCH Rooms Seats ASF Growth Avg. WRH SO% ASF/Seat

Current 8am-5pm 2,189 80,801 98 4,970 89,782 22.3 72.8% 18.1

Calculated 76.8 4,232 84,631 17% 28.5 67.0% 20

Current 9am-5pm 2,120 78,106 98 4,970 89,782 21.6 72.6% 18.1

Calculated 82.8 4,554 91,075 9% 25.6 67.0% 20



25. At the 64% WRH goal (28.5) for the 8am to 5pm timeframe, UWG could reduce the total classrooms to 77 (76.8 calculated), the total seats to 4,232, and the ASF to 84,631. The classrooms in Boyd, Richards, Callaway Annex and Pafford, are all currently scheduled near 30 Average WRH indicating the ability to achieve these goals.

26. At the 64% WRH goal (25.6) for the 9am to 5pm timeframe, which more accurately depicts current practices, UWG could reduce the total classrooms to 83, and the total seats to 4,554. The ASF calculation of 91,075, which is above the current ASF, is mainly due to the current ASF/Seat of 18.1 being below the goal of 20 ASF/Seat.

27. Another alternative perspective is reflected in the column entitled “Potential Growth”. Enrollment growth potential within the existing classroom supply ranges from 9% to 17% depending on the instructional timeframe being considered.

Table 10: USG Metric Needs

Reduce Seats

Increase WSCH

Capacity WSCH WRH Goal USG Metric

Capacity WSCH WRH Goal USG Metric

4,970 81,848 40 0.412 4,970 81,848 40 0.412

4,080 81,579 40 0.500 4,970 99,350 40 0.500

3,400 81,579 40 0.600 4,970 119,200 40 0.600

*USG Classroom Metric guidelines suggested rates range between .5 and .7

28. The USG classroom metric does not calculate how many rooms are needed; it calculates an efficiency ratio using seats, WSCH, and a WRH goal. A range of .5 to .7 is defined as ‘good’ utilization. To change the metric, seats must be reduced, WSCH must be increased, or a combination of both.

29. Reduce Seats: Reducing seats by 890 to reach 4,080 seats would raise the metric to .5, or the minimum of the USG range.

30. Increase WSCH: An increase in WSCH to 99,350 (21.4% increase in students contact hours) would be required to meet the .5 metric.

31. Overall this table helps illustrate how the USG WRH goal of 40, which doesn’t include class change minutes, , makes it difficult to achieve the .5 to .7 range without a larger evening and weekend program than UWG currently has.

Classroom Needs Detail - How it works:

The room’s columns show how many classrooms exist for each size range for Fall 2014.

Weekly Room Hours (WRH) are summarized by the size ranges. The WRH of all the classes in each size range

are then used for a base.

The Required Rooms columns show how many rooms are needed based on demand (WRH) and expected

utilization goals. The total WRH for classes in each size range (based on actual class enrollment) are divided by

the expected WRH goal to yield the number of rooms needed. The 9am to 5pm timeframe with a goal of 26.5

WRH is used for the detail section since it most accurately reflects the current scheduling practices.



Best Fit: In the detailed computation (not shown) a cascading factor is applied to each size range to allow

some demand for a range to flow into a larger classroom (i.e., a 60% cascade factor is applied to the 1-19 size

range, therefore 60% of the demand for 1-19 seat rooms would be allowed to “cascade” into the demand for

the next range, or in this example, the 20-29 seat classroom range). Cascading factors decrease through the

size ranges so that all demand is met.

Table 11: Classroom Needs Detail: (9am to 5pm, 25.6 WRH Expected)

Current Required Rooms

Cum Required Best Fit

Size Rooms Enroll Limit Cum Rooms Enroll Limit Enroll Limit

1-19 9 14.6 6.9 9 14.6 6.9 5 2

20-29 17 26.7 27.9 26 41.3 34.8 28 24

30-39 26 17.4 20.6 52 58.7 55.4 20 23

40-59 22 14.4 16.7 74 73.0 72.1 17 19

60-79 10 2.9 3.3 84 76.0 75.4 5 6

80-99 6 3.1 3.8 90 79.1 79.2 3 4

100-149 5 3.0 2.8 95 82.1 82.0 3 3

150-249 2 0.7 0.8 97 82.8 82.8 1 1

>=250 1 0.0 0.0 98 82.8 82.8 1 1

Totals 98 82.8 82.8 83 83

32. The Required Rooms columns show how many rooms are needed to satisfy demand by size range with an

expectation of 25.6 WRH (64% utilization of the 9am to 5pm time frame).

a. The 1-19 size range, based on enrollments, shows a demand of 14.6 rooms with only 9 actual rooms available. However, limits for this range showed only a demand for 6.9 rooms which reflects that limits for these classes are typically set at or above 20.

b. The 60-79 seat range has 10 rooms with a demand of only 2.9 rooms based on enrollments and 3.3 rooms based on max scheduling limits. However, this range helps catch up with the demand from the smaller ranges as can be seen under the cumulative columns showing that the supply of rooms has now caught up with the required rooms. The excess in this range also provides flexibility to handle changes made by departments to the configuration of section offerings and class sizes.

33. Comparing the Best Fit column to the Required Rooms column helps to make future adjustments to sizes of classrooms that will be built, remodeled, or repurposed.

34. Overall there is a very good mixture of classroom size ranges to meet the demand of classes.



Table 12: Classroom Needs Detail: By College (25.6 WRH Expected, 9am-5pm, 40 hours available) Size of Room Need

College 1-19 20-29 30-39 40-59 60-79 80-99 100-149 150-249 >=250 Needs Total

Current Rooms

CAH 5.4 16.2 4.1 1.4 0.6 1.3 0.1 0.5 - 29.5 21

CSM 3.6 3.9 3.4 2.9 1.3 0.2 2.4 - - 17.7 22

CSS 2.8 1.8 3.4 3.5 0.4 1.7 0.5 0.2 - 14.3 20

Sub Totals 11.9 21.8 10.9 7.8 2.3 3.1 3.0 0.7 - 61.5 63

COE 1.7 2.2 3.4 0.3 0.2 - - - - 7.8 19

NURS - - - 0.5 0.4 - - - - 0.8 5

RCB 0.6 0.5 3.0 5.7 - - - - - 9.9 11

VPAA 0.4 2.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - - - 2.8 Total 14.6 26.7 17.4 14.4 2.9 3.1 3.0 0.7 - 82.8 Current Rooms 9 17 26 22 10 6 5 2 1 98 98

35. The Needs by College table shows how many rooms are need for each college and compares this against the

current rooms. This helps to make decisions about the future classroom supply denoting where shortfalls and surpluses exist.

Table 13: Room Size Versus Class Size

Class Size Current

Room Size 19-Jan 20-29 30-39 40-59 60-79 80-99 100-149 150-249 >=250 Rooms

1-19 88.60% 11.40% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9

20-29 28.20% 69.50% 1.50% 0.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 17

30-39 22.40% 43.80% 31.30% 2.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 26

40-59 11.80% 24.20% 32.80% 31.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 22

60-79 4.30% 20.70% 35.90% 26.10% 13.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10

80-99 0.00% 7.50% 18.90% 39.60% 11.30% 22.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 6

100-149 0.00% 2.20% 0.00% 33.30% 15.60% 20.00% 28.90% 0.00% 0.00% 5

150-249 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8.70% 0.00% 34.80% 52.20% 4.30% 0.00% 2

>=250 10.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.00% 10.00% 20.00% 50.00% 0.00% 1

*Note: Percentages to the right of the shaded areas are where class enrollments exceeded room capacity

36. The Room versus class size table is a supplement to the detailed needs table. This table shows the percentage of classes scheduled into rooms based on sizes of classes and sizes of rooms. For example, 20.7% of the classes held in 60-79 seat rooms had enrollments between 20-29 students.



Classroom Capacity: USG Graph

Table 14: USG Classroom Graph-Fall 2014

37. The USG Classroom Graph takes the average WRH for all classrooms and fills classes into rooms up to the average WRH (24.6 Avg WRH for UWG, 7am-11pm including weekends) based on enrollment. It plots against the 40 WRH goal and capacities. The space between the bars is excess capacity in each room.

Table 15: Maximize Classrooms



38. The Maximize graph takes an alternative view and looks at the 9am to 5pm time frame filling every room to a goal of 26 WRH where the enrollment is less than or equal to the capacity. The space where no enrollments exist is the excess available space. The graph is hypothetical in that it plots where classes could have been scheduled not where they actually were scheduled.



Class Lab Utilization

Overview

The following section presents a utilization analysis for the University of West Georgia Carrollton campus class labs for

the Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 terms. Both terms have been assessed to capture the use of rooms that may be

scheduled for only a specific term. Since teaching labs are discipline specific, labs have been grouped and the data

summarized by unit/discipline. Note: there is no comparable USG utilization metrics for class labs as there are

classrooms. Therefore, a similar comparison to the USG metrics completed in the classroom section of this report is

not included in this section.

The following data and criteria are used and presented in this analysis:

Space Inventory data for each lab including

o Building

o Room number

o ASF = Assignable square feet

o Stations = number of teaching stations

o Average Station Size = Stations/ASF

Fall and Spring Utilization

o WRH All = Weekly Room Hour All is the total number of hours per week that the lab was scheduled

for use as reported in the class file for the entire day from 8 am to 10 pm, Monday – Friday.

o WRH Day = the number hours per week that the lab was scheduled for use during the day – 8 am to 5

pm, Monday – Friday.

Any difference between the WRH All and WRH day represents the evening use.

o Station Occupancy % = compares the section enrollment to the total lab stations as a percentage.

Guidelines

o Weekly Room Hours: WRH Daytime – the recommended number of hours the lab should be used for

scheduled classes during the week to achieve full utilization. For disciplines requiring lab set up time,

the WRH Daytime recommendation is generally 22 hours. For disciplines where students are

expected to spend significant unscheduled time in the lab, the WRH Daytime recommendation is

between 15 and 18 hours. For disciplines that require no set up time the WRH Daytime

recommendation is similar to that for classroom.

o Station Size = the space, in square feet, typically required for each student in that discipline. Note:

the station sizes do not include an allocation for lab service space.

o Station Occupancy recommendation = 80%

% of Guideline Enrollment

o This compares the actual utilization to the guideline recommendation. For example, if a lab was used

15 hours per week with 60% station occupancy and the guideline recommendation suggests 22 hours

per week with 80 % station occupancy. The % of Guideline Enrollment is then calculated as (15 WRH

x 60%) / (22 WRH x 80%) or 51%. This means that if the lab were scheduled at the guideline

recommendation the lab could accommodate 49% more students.

Note: Average utilization is provided for each discipline and is based on the labs used for that term. Also,

tables which include the guideline factors are shown where the criteria differ between lab types. Otherwise, if

not shown uniform criteria are applied to all labs and are stated in the text.



Class Lab Utilization: Campus Summary The following table presents a summary of the class labs located on the Carrollton campus and their utilization rates for

both the Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 semesters.

Table 16: Class Lab Utilization Summary

Inventory Data

Fall Utilization

Spring Utilization

Guidelines

% of Guideline

Enrollment

Un

it/D

isci

plin

e

Lab

Co

un

t

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ayti

me

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ayti

me

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H D

ayti

me

Stat

ion

Siz

e

Fall

Spri

ng

Art 14 18,098 298 60.7 16.3 12.6 62% 18.1 12.4 59% 18 60 54% 51%

Biology 14 13,404 370 36.2 11.2 8.8 97% 12.4 10.4 87% 22 45 48% 51%

Chemistry 4 7,830 132 59.3 12.8 10.3 72% 17.0 14.5 80% 18 55 52% 81%

Geosciences 5 4,875 148 32.9 7.8 7.4 70% 9.1 8.7 59% 22 45 29% 29%

Physics 4 2,972 88 33.8 17.0 12.2 72% 21.0 15.8 64% 22 50 50% 58%

Music 6 7,368 226 32.6 10.9 9.3 65% 16.6 14.1 45% 15 44 50% 53%

Computer Science 2 2,534 68 37.3 24.0 24.0 65% 24.0 22.5 79% 30 35 65% 74%

College of Education 2 1,502 33 45.5 11.5 8.7 100% 9.3 9.3 61% 22 55 50% 32%

Leadership & Instruction 1 2,550 42 60.7 9.7 9.7 41% 28.7 20.7 47% 22 60 22% 56%

Mass Communication 1 744 20 37.2 31.6 20.7 73% 0.0 0.0 0.0 30 35 63% 0%

Speech 2 1,342 65 20.6 22.6 22.6 80% 19.6 19.6 81% 30 30 75% 66%

Theatre 2 2,024 38 53.3 8.6 8.6 56% 7.5 7.5 55% 15 100 40% 34%

Totals/Averages 57 65,243 1,528 42.7 13.9 11.4 68% 15.5 12.6 66% 20.5 51 46% 50%

Overall Findings:

The 57 labs across Campus have 1,528 stations in 65,243 square feet.

o Average station size = 42.7 square feet

o Guideline weighted station size = 51 square feet

Utilization Average for All Campus Labs

o Fall All Day = 13.9 Hours per week

o Fall Daytime = 11.4 Hours per week / 68% station occupancy

o Spring All Day = 15.1 Hours per week

o Spring Daytime = 12.6 Hours per week / 66% station occupancy

o Guideline Weighted Utilization - Daytime: 20.5 hours per week / 80% station occupancy

% of Guideline Enrollment for Campus labs

o Fall = 46%

o Spring = 50%

Note: Weighted utilization is a composite rate to present a combined average rate of the entire mix of labs

for the entire campus. This weighted averaged is calculated by multiplying the number of labs by the

guideline WRH and divided by the total number of labs.



Conclusions:

o The laboratory supply for the University is sufficient to address the current instructional demand with an

aggregate guideline capacity to accommodate a 54% increase in enrollment for the Fall 2014 semester. Spring

2015 has a guideline enrollment capacity of 50%.

o The Spring 2015 lab utilization is greater than the Fall term. This result deviates from typical instructional

patterns where the fall semester usually is the peak term for an academic year.

o Computer Science and Speech are the program areas with the highest utilization rates spanning both terms.

Chemistry has the highest single term utilization during the Spring semester.

Class Lab Utilization by Department/Program

Art Studios

Art has fourteen studios located in the Humanities Building and Visual Arts Building. The following table provides the

utilization data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015. Where studios are grouped by type, totals and averages are provided for

that studio type. Even if a studio has no reported use in the term it is included in the averages as it is assumed that it is

used to meet the overall need. For example, in Drawing and Painting, Humanities 317 and 320 were scheduled for over

30 hours per week, while Humanities 303 and 304 were not scheduled.

Table 17: Art Studio Utilization

Inventory Data

Fall Utilization

Spring Utilization

Guidelines

Stu

dio

Typ

e

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Siz

e (

sqft

)

Photography

Humanities 227 600 21 28.6 35.0 35.0 56% 29.1 23.3 58% 18 35

Drawing and Painting

Humanities 303 533 19 28.1 3.0 3.0 89%

Humanities 304 530 6 88.3

Humanities 317 1,497 24 62.4 38.8 33.0 77% 44.7 33.0 49%

Humanities 319 1,020 14 72.9 17.5 11.7 68% 23.3 11.7 82%

Humanities 320 1,544 17 90.8 34.0 22.3 99% 34.2 28.2 87%

Totals 5 5,124 80 90 67 105 76

Averages 64.1 18.1 13.4 82% 21.0 15.2 71% 18 70

Art Education

Humanities 230 722 18 40.1 17.0 11.2 39% 8.8 0.0 18 35

Graphic Design

Humanities 207 718 20

Humanities 318 1,020 17 60.0 23.3 23.3 66% 29.1 23.3 66%

Visual Arts 105 1,036 20 51.8 5.8 5.8 95% 11.7 11.7 65%

Visual Arts 105 1,036 20

Totals 4 3,810 77 29 29 41 35

Averages 49.5 7.3 7.3 82% 10.2 8.7 66% 18 70

Sculpture*

Visual Arts 106 1,375 20 68.8 17.5 5.8 65% 17.5 5.8 40% 18 70

Ceramics *

Visual Arts 109-125

4,005 20 200.3 28.2 16.5 50% 28.2 16.5 76% 18 60

Printmaking



Visual Arts 134 2,462 62 39.7 11.7 11.7 20% 23.3 17.5 19% 18 60

Totals – All Studios

Totals 14 18,098 298 229 176 253 174

Averages 1,293 21.3 60.7 16.3 12.6 62% 18.1 12.4 59% 18 60

*Visual Arts Building rooms 109,122,123,124,125 are grouped and treated as a ceramics complex since it includes a kiln and clay mixing and

glazing facilities which are not separately scheduled. All classes are scheduled into Visual Arts Building room 125.

Findings:

The 14 labs have 298 stations in 18,098 square feet.


o Guideline station size = 60 square feet

Utilization Average on Studios Scheduled





o Guideline Utilization: 18 hours per week / 80% station occupancy


o Fall = 54%

o Spring = 51%

Comments:

The following six studios or studio support facilities were not scheduled for Fall 2014 or Spring 2015 term and are not

included in this analysis. Note: although these rooms do not have scheduled use recorded in the class file database

used to conduct this analysis, they directly support all of the other studio areas and are an integral part of the

instructional program. Reclassification of these rooms to support or service functions should be considered.

Studio Type Building Room

No. ASF Stations Avg.

Station Size

Flex Visual Arts 104 592 20 29.6

Wood Visual Arts 113 2,400 20 120.0

Plastic Visual Arts 126 127 4 31.8

Metal Visual Arts 110 2,327 20 116.4

Mold Visual Arts 111 786 20 39.3

Foundry Visual Arts 112 1,010 20 50.5

Totals 6 7,242 104 69.6



Biology

Biology has fourteen labs located in the Biology Building. The following table provides the utilization data for Fall 2014

and Spring 2015.

Table 18: Biology Lab Utilization

Inventory Data Fall Utilization Spring Utilization

Lab

Use

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

SCIENCE FOUNDATION LAB Biology 112 920 30 30.7 8.0 8.0 82% 6.0 6.0 86%

BIO 1010 TEACHING LAB Biology 117 926 30 30.9 24.0 20.0 92% 22.0 15.0 96%


COMPARATIVE ORGANISMAL Biology 130 1,133 26 43.6

9.5 7.5 90%

GENERAL BIOLOGY Biology 141 900 24 37.5 8.0 7.5 102% 12.2 9.0 78%

A & P TEACHING LAB Biology 218 1,139 24 47.5 2.0 1.0 125% 6.2 6.2 94%

A & P TEACHING LAB Biology 225 1,211 36 33.6 14.0 11.0 85% 14.0 10.0 80%

ECO ORGANISM Biology 232 955 24 39.8 CELL & MOL BIOLOGY Biology 237 872 24 36.3 3.0 3.0 104% 9.3 9.3 84%

BIO DIVERSITY Biology 245 806 24 33.6 6.0 6.0 94% 13.0 10.0 63%

BACTERIOLOGY Biology 249 1,080 24 45.0

12.7 12.7 100%



HONORS TEACHING LAB Biology 275 841 24 35.0 8.0 6.0 100% 16.0 14.0 93%

Totals 14 13,404 370 36.2 123.0 96.5 160.9 134.7

Avg. Utilization 11.2 8.8 97% 12.4 10.4 87%

Findings:

The 14 labs have 370 stations in 13,404 square feet



Utilization Average on Labs Scheduled







o Fall = 48%

o Spring = 51%

Comments:

The Biology 1010 lab (room 117) and Biology 1110 lab (room 121) have no reported use for either Fall or Spring terms.

The lab sections meet in Room 113 and Room 118 classrooms. The utilization data reported in the above table is the



same as that for the classrooms since the students move between the classrooms and the labs at various times during

the scheduled lab times. Room 232 was not scheduled either Fall or Spring terms.

Chemistry

Chemistry has 4 labs all located in the Technology-Enhanced Learning Center (TLC). The following table provides the

utilization data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 19: Chemistry Lab Utilization


Lab

Use

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

CHEMISTRY ADVANCED LAB TLC 3104 1,404 20 70.2 4.0 4.0 15% 7.8 7.8 36%

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY TLC 3107 2,558 36 71.1 15.9 15.9 74% 15.9 15.9 92%

CHEMISTRY TEACHING LAB TLC 3108 2,908 64 45.4 25.0 15.1 72% 33.7 23.7 79%

ENVIRONMENTAL LAB TLC 3115 960 12 80.0 6.3 6.3 125% 10.7 10.7 91%

Totals 4 7,830 132 59.3 51 41 68 58

Avg. Utilization 12.8 10.3 72% 17.0 14.5 80%

Findings:











o Fall = 52%

o Spring = 82%



Geosciences

Geosciences has 5 labs located in the Callaway Science Building and the Callaway Building Annex The following table

provides the utilization data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 20: Geology Lab Utilization


Lab

Use

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y

%

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y

%

CLASSRM LAB Callaway 111 1,096 40 27.4 16.0 16.0 72% 10.0 10.0 75%

CLASSRM LB Callaway 119 815 24 34.0 6.0 5.5 75% 10.1 10.1 73%

ROCK LAB Callaway G-07 1,020 24 42.5 2.2 1.5 88% 10.0 9.0 58%

GIS LAB Callaway Annex 156 1,190 40 29.8 11.0 11.0 36% 3.0 3.0 30%

ADVANCED GIS LAB Callaway Annex 242 754 20 37.7 4.0 3.0 40% 12.6 11.6 54%

Totals 5 4,875 148 32.9 39 37 46 44

Avg. Utilization 7.8 7.4 70% 9.1 8.7 59%

Findings:











o Fall = 29%

o Spring = 29%

Physics

Physics has four labs located in the James E Boyd Building (Boyd). The following table provides the utilization data for

Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 21: Physics Lab Utilization


Lab

Use

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

ELECTRONICS LAB Boyd 108 857 13 65.9 7.0 7.0 119%

GENERAL PHYSICS LAB Boyd 201 855 30 28.5 28.1 21.6 82% 15.0 10.0 71%

CLASSRM Boyd 202 400 15 26.7 3.0 2.0 27% 3.0 1.5 13%



GENERAL PHYSICS LAB Boyd 203 860 30 28.7 30.0 18.0 72% 45.0 36.0 63%

Totals 4 2,972 88 33.8 68 49 63 48

Avg. Utilization 17.0 12.2 72% 21.0 15.8 64%

Findings:











o Fall = 50%

o Spring = 58%

Music Studios

Music has six studios located in the Humanities Building. The following table provides the utilization data for Fall 2014

and Spring 2015.

Table 22: Music Studio Utilization

Inventory Data Fall Utilization Spring Utilization Guidelines

Stu

dio

Use

Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Siz

e (

sqft

)

Classroom Humanities 0138 388 8 48.5 5.0 5.0 113% 5.0 5.0 163% 15 40

Midi Computer Lab Humanities 141 390 12 32.5 3.0 3.0 92%

15 30

Piano Lab Humanities 232 416 17 24.5 8.3 8.3 71% 9.2 9.2 50% 15 40

Choir Room Humanities 301 2,124 74 28.7 16.9 14.2 50% 21.4 16.5 46% 15 40

Percussion Studio Humanities 329 560 6 93.3 2.2 0.0

15 80

Band Room Humanities 331 3,878 117 33.1 35 30 20% 36 31 20% 15 40

Totals

6 7,368 226 32.6 66 56

66 57 Avg. Utilization

10.9 9.3 65% 16.6 14.1 45% 15 44

Findings:



o Guideline station size = 44 square feet (excluding service space)










o Fall = 50%

o Spring = 53%

Computer Science

Computer Science has two labs located in the Technology Learning Center (TLC). The following table provides the

utilization data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 23: Computer Science Lab Utilization


Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

Technology Learning Center 1210 910 24 37.9 18.0 18.0 76% 21.0 18.0 72%

Technology Learning Center 1211 1,624 44 36.9 30.0 30.0 55% 27.0 27.0 75%

Totals 2 2,534 68 37.3 48 48 48 45

Avg. Utilization 24.0 24.0 65% 24.0 22.5 79%

Findings:











o Fall = 65%

o Spring = 74%



College of Education

The College of Education has two labs located in the Education Annex (EA). The following table provides the utilization

data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 24: College of Education Lab Utilization

Inventory Data Fall Utilization Spring Utilization B

uild

ing

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

Education Annex 167 666 24 27.8 12.8 12.8 70% 13.3 13.3 46%

Education Annex 170 836 9 92.9 10.2 4.6 170% 5.3 5.3 83%

Totals 2 1,502 33 45.5 23 17 19 19

Avg. Utilization 11.5 8.7 100% 9.3 9.3 61%

Findings:











o Fall = 49%

o Spring = 32%



Leadership and Instruction

Leadership and Instruction has one lab located in the Coliseum. The following table provides the utilization data for


Table 25: Leadership and Instruction Lab Utilization


Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y

%

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

Coliseum 2105 2,550 42 60.7 9.7 9.7 41% 28.7 20.7 47%

Findings:

The lab has 42 stations in 2,550 square feet










o Fall = 22%

o Spring = 56%

Mass Communications

Mass Communications has one lab located in the Anthropology Building. The following table provides the utilization

data for Fall 2014. Spring 2015 shows no use.

Table 26: Mass Communications Lab Utilization


Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

Anthropology Building G-15 744 20 37.2 31.6 20.7 73% 0.0

Findings:

The lab has 20 stations in 744 square feet








o Spring Term – no scheduled use



o Fall = 63%

o Spring = 0%

Speech

There are two Speech Labs; one located in Pafford Social Science Building and one in the Humanities Building. The

following table provides the utilization data for Fall 2014 and Spring 2015.

Table 27: Speech Lab Utilization


Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(sq

ft)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

Pafford 212 918 37 24.8 21.0 21.0 71% 21.0 21.0 71%

Humanities Bldg 212 424 28 15.1 24.2 24.2 93% 18.2 18.2 93%

Totals 2 1,342 65 20.6 45 45 39 39

Avg. Utilization 22.6 22.6 80% 19.6 19.6 81%

Findings:











o Fall = 75%

o Spring = 66%



Theater Studios

There are two Theater studios located in the Martha Munro Hall. The following table provides the utilization data for


Table 28: Theater Studio Utilization


Bu

ildin

g

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

. Sta

tio

n S

ize

(s

qft

)

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y %

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

y

%

Martha Monroe 105 1,114 20 55.7 11.1 11.1 57% 9.0 9.0 38%

Martha Monroe 111 910 18 50.6 6.1 6.1 50% 6.0 6.0 81%

Totals 2 2,024 38 53.3 17 17 15 15

Avg. Utilization 8.6 8.6 56% 7.5 7.5 55%

Findings:











o Fall = 40%

o Spring = 34%



Appendix A: Classroom Listing

Building Room College Assignment Sq. Feet Capacity S. F. /Seat WRH Day SO% WSCH Metric

Adamson 115 RCB DRCB 626 31 20.2 11.0 63.0% 370 0.30

Adamson 117 RCB DRCB 1,621 88 18.4 33.0 52.0% 1,809 0.51

Adamson 217 RCB DRCB 916 50 18.3 21.0 77.0% 893 0.45

Adamson 227 RCB DRCB 916 50 18.3 27.0 70.0% 943 0.47

Anthropology 12 CSS DCSS 981 38 25.8 16.0 68.0% 367 0.24

Anthropology 2 CSS DCSS 1,114 92 12.1 25.1 61.0% 1,333 0.36

Anthropology 7 CSS DCSS 1,067 50 21.3 30.2 61.0% 808 0.40

Biology 113 CSM BIO 586 38 15.4 21.0 73.0% 629 0.41

Biology 114 CSM BIO 836 61 13.7 15.1 67.0% 659 0.27

Biology 118 CSM BIO 522 50 10.4 8.0 47.0% 172 0.09

Biology 144 CSM DCSM 525 36 14.6 15.2 58.0% 334 0.23

Biology 148 CSM DCSM 871 72 12.1 18.1 40.0% 479 0.17

Biology 150 CSM DCSM 618 45 13.7 17.1 51.0% 446 0.25

Biology 151 CSM DCSM 1,837 112 16.4 34.2 87.0% 3,308 0.74

Biology 240 CSM BIO 481 12 40.1 6.0 74.0% 106 0.22

Biology 241 CSM DCSM 473 39 12.1 3.0 54.0% 56 0.04

Boyd 206 CSM DCSM 433 25 17.3 25.3 72.0% 395 0.40

Boyd 230 CSM DCSM 1,731 150 11.5 35.6 69.0% 3,641 0.61

Boyd 301 CSM DCSM 585 40 14.6 29.6 96.0% 1,065 0.67

Boyd 302 CSM DCSM 434 31 14.0 24.4 71.0% 532 0.43

Boyd 303 CSM DCSM 575 41 14.0 32.6 93.0% 1,271 0.77

Boyd 304 CSM DCSM 430 30 14.3 29.5 77.0% 629 0.52

Boyd 305 CSM DCSM 711 49 14.5 31.6 91.0% 1,451 0.74

Boyd 307 CSM DCSM 708 36 19.7 36.5 76.0% 867 0.60

Callaway 205 CSM DCSM 999 63 15.9 26.0 68.0% 1,139 0.45

Callaway Anx 145 CSM DCSM 1,632 78 20.9 33.4 75.0% 1,688 0.54

Callaway Anx 146 CSM DCSM 963 48 20.1 30.1 71.0% 914 0.48

Cobb 130 CAH FLL 373 14 26.6 9.0 81.0% 91 0.16

Coliseum 2100 COE DEDUC 2,370 77 30.8 13.0 63.0% 555 0.18

Coliseum 2120 COE DEDUC 617 26 23.7 0.0 0.0% 50 0.05

Coliseum 2122 COE DEDUC 756 33 22.9 6.6 71.0% 157 0.12




Education Anx 113 COE DEDUC 381 14 27.2 0.0 0.0% 33 0.06



Education Cntr 0200 COE DEDUC 933 46 20.3 13.5 73.0% 573 0.31






Education Cntr 1 COE DEDUC 1,862 72 25.9 30.6 52.0% 1,338 0.46

Education Cntr 2 COE DEDUC 1,862 72 25.9 30.7 40.0% 955 0.33

Education Cntr 3 COE DEDUC 1,857 72 25.8 21.3 47.0% 981 0.34

Humanities 130 CSS DCSS 405 26 15.6 12.2 80.0% 218 0.21

Humanities 131 CAH DCAS 405 25 16.2 34.8 97.0% 715 0.72

Humanities 203 CAH DCAS 1,218 52 23.4 29.8 51.0% 891 0.43







Humanities 228 CSS DCSS 416 30 13.9 15.0 82.0% 328 0.27





Humanities 312 CSS DCSS 2,040 99 20.6 27.0 46.0% 1,442 0.36

Melson 104 CSS DCSS 323 18 17.9 19.5 37.0% 146 0.20

Melson 207 CSS DCSS 413 20 20.6 18.0 58.0% 208 0.26

Melson 213 CSS DCSS 374 17 22.0 14.0 36.0% 78 0.11

Melson 218 CSS DCSS 881 38 23.2 25.5 86.0% 966 0.64

Nursing 106 NURS NURS 3,061 136 22.5 15.0 47.0% 907 0.17

Nursing 110 NURS NURS 942 40 23.6 8.1 79.0% 223 0.14



RCOB 1201 RCB DRCB 1,871 112 16.7 21.0 48.0% 1,148 0.26

RCOB 1308 RCB DRCB 654 41 16.0 31.0 70.0% 816 0.50

RCOB 1309 RCB DRCB 739 52 14.2 32.0 69.0% 1,113 0.54

RCOB 2201 RCB DRCB 729 45 16.2 28.5 66.0% 786 0.44

RCOB 2202 RCB DRCB 723 45 16.1 26.0 85.0% 906 0.50

RCOB 2213 RCB DRCB 1,043 63 16.6 31.0 63.0% 1,488 0.59

RCOB 2214 RCB DRCB 1,043 69 15.1 33.7 57.0% 1,462 0.53

Social Sciences 102 CSS DCSS 1,016 50 20.3 35.7 75.0% 1,452 0.73

Social Sciences 106 CSS DCSS 614 36 17.1 36.3 81.0% 1,149 0.80

Social Sciences 107 CSS DCSS 557 25 22.3 25.0 79.0% 479 0.48

Social Sciences 109 CAH DCAS 557 29 19.2 23.1 72.0% 461 0.40






Social Sciences 302 CSS DCSS 823 48 17.1 36.5 62.0% 1,072 0.56





Social Sciences 309 CAH ENG 445 16 27.8 21.0 73.0% 281 0.44

Social Sciences BONN CSS DCSS 1,716 205 8.4 31.2 52.0% 3,379 0.41

Tech Learn 1103 CSM CHEM 636 18 35.3 6.7 63.0% 131 0.18


Tech Learn 1200 CAH DCAS 1,362 86 15.8 33.3 57.0% 1,519 0.44


Tech Learn 1301 CSM DCSM 1,778 122 14.6 24.0 72.0% 2,295 0.47


Tech Learn 1305 CSM DCSM 4,076 293 13.9 29.0 46.0% 4,007 0.34




Appendix B: Classrooms With No Usage Bldg_Num Bldg_Name_Abbr Room Coll Assignment Room_Type ASF Capacity ASF/Seat

0012 Old Aud 0119A CSS ANTH 110 1,090 38 28.7

The function of this room needs to be

investigated

0032 Nursing 112 NURS NURS 110 797 24 33.2

This is a Multipurpose room adjacent to the

building lobby. It is frequently used for

events and may not be conducive to

instruction based on its location. Thus, the use of this room may need

to be reclassified

0032 Nursing 122 NURS NURS 110 1,037 36 28.8

The room showed 6.0 WRH in 2013 study but 0 in 2014. Investigation

is needed

0044 Murphy 0314 EL EDP 110 1,906 26 73.3

The part of the building this room is located in

is going to be razed and then renovated.

Unsure as to whether instruction will resume

in this building

0060 Education Cntr 4 COE DEDUC 110 1,862 72 25.9

This room showed 7.4 WRH for 2013 study,

but 0 for this 2014 study. The space is

often scheduled for events and may be

restricted to this use, therefore it may need

to be reclassified

0060 Education Cntr 5 COE DEDUC 110 1,855 72 25.8 See note for Ed Cntr 4



Appendix C: Class Lab Utilization Details Inventory Data Fall 2014 Daytime Utilization Spring 2015 Daytime Utilization

Ass

ign

Ro

om

Typ

e

Bld

g.

Ro

om

ASF

Stat

ion

s

Avg

Sea

t Si

ze

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

%

WSC

H

Enro

ll

Sect

ion

s

Avg

Sec

t Si

ze

WR

H A

ll

WR

H D

ay

Stat

ion

Occ

up

%

WSC

H

Enro

ll

Sect

ion

s

Avg

Sec

t Si

ze

ART 211 0024 227 600 21 28.6 35.0 35.0 56% 408.1 70 6 11.7 29.1 23.3 58% 285.7 49 4 12.3

ART 211 0024 230 722 18 40.1 17.0 11.2 39% 77.6 14 2 7.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0 0

ART 211 0024 303 533 19 28.1 3.0 3.0 89% 51.0 17 1 17.0

ART 211 0024 317 1,497 24 62.4 38.8 33.0 77% 608.5 72 4 18.0 44.7 33.0 49% 386.2 43 4 10.8

ART 211 0024 318 1,020 17 60.0 23.3 23.3 66% 262.4 45 4 11.3 29.1 23.3 66% 262.4 45 4 11.3

ART 211 0024 319 1,020 14 72.9 17.5 11.7 68% 110.8 19 2 9.5 23.3 11.7 82% 134.1 23 2 11.5

ART 211 0024 320 1,544 17 90.8 34.0 22.3 99% 377.6 49 3 16.3 34.2 28.2 87% 418.6 61 4 15.3

ART 221 0024 210 735 20 36.8 5.8 5.8 85% 99.1 17 1 17.0

ART 270 0019 105 1,036 20 51.8 5.8 5.8 95% 110.8 19 1 19.0 11.7 11.7 65% 151.6 26 2 13.0

ART 270 0019 106 1,375 20 68.8 17.5 5.8 65% 75.8 13 1 13.0 17.5 5.8 40% 46.6 8 1 8.0

ART 270 0019 125 1,953 20 97.7 28.2 16.5 50% 165.0 20 2 10.0 28.2 16.5 76% 252.3 30 2 15.0

ART 270 0019 134 2,462 62 39.7 11.7 11.7 20% 145.8 25 2 12.5 23.3 17.5 19% 204.1 35 3 11.7

BIO 211 0058 112 920 30 30.7 8.0 8.0 82% 196.0 98 4 24.5 6.0 6.0 86% 154.0 77 3 25.7

BIO 211 0058 130 1,133 26 43.6 9.5 7.5 90% 175.5 69 3 23.0

BIO 211 0058 141 900 24 37.5 8.0 7.5 102% 183.0 74 3 24.7 12.2 9.0 78% 168.0 56 3 18.7

BIO 211 0058 218 1,139 24 47.5 2.0 1.0 125% 30.0 30 1 30.0 6.2 6.2 94% 139.4 68 3 22.7

BIO 211 0058 225 1,211 36 33.6 14.0 11.0 85% 335.0 213 7 30.4 14.0 10.0 80% 287.0 173 6 28.8

BIO 211 0058 237 872 24 36.3 3.0 3.0 104% 75.0 25 1 25.0 9.3 9.3 84% 188.0 60 3 20.0

BIO 211 0058 245 806 24 33.6 6.0 6.0 94% 135.0 45 2 22.5 13.0 10.0 63% 152.0 76 5 15.2

BIO 211 0058 249 1,080 24 45.0 12.7 12.7 100% 304.3 96 4 24.0

BIO 211 0058 256 864 24 36.0 18.0 12.0 101% 290.0 145 6 24.2 18.0 13.0 94% 293.0 158 7 22.6

BIO 211 0058 266 839 26 32.3 22.0 12.0 108% 338.0 169 6 28.2 12.0 12.0 87% 272.0 136 6 22.7

BIO 211 0058 275 841 24 35.0 8.0 6.0 100% 144.0 72 3 24.0 16.0 14.0 93% 314.0 179 8 22.4

CHEM 211 0034 3104 1,404 20 70.2 4.0 4.0 15% 12.0 3 1 3.0 7.8 7.8 36% 56.3 15 2 7.5

CHEM 211 0034 3107 2,558 36 71.1 15.9 15.9 74% 421.6 133 5 26.6 15.9 15.9 92% 523.1 165 5 33.0

CHEM 211 0034 3108 2,908 64 45.4 25.0 15.1 72% 691.3 358 8 44.8 33.7 23.7 79% 1,192.3 432 9 48.0

CHEM 211 0034 3115 960 12 80.0 6.3 6.3 125% 95.1 30 2 15.0 10.7 10.7 91% 116.6 20 2 10.0

CS 211 0034 1210 910 24 37.9 18.0 18.0 76% 327.0 109 6 18.2 21.0 18.0 72% 309.0 103 6 17.2

CS 211 0034 1211 1,624 44 36.9 30.0 30.0 55% 729.0 243 10 24.3 27.0 27.0 75% 894.0 298 9 33.1

CSI 250 0063 220 450 24 18.8 11.0 3.0 108% 78.0 26 1 26.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0 0

CW999 221 0015 208 599 16 37.4 6.0 5.0 109% 87.0 24 2 12.0

DCSM 211 0015 120 595 38 15.7 12.0 12.0 41% 189.0 63 4 15.8 11.1 11.1 29% 120.3 44 4 11.0

DCSM 211 0015 205 999 63 15.9 29.7 26.0 68% 1,115.0 383 9 42.6 30.2 30.2 60% 1,150.5 380 10 38.0

DCSM 211 0015 207 1,002 28 35.8 6.0 4.0 95% 106.0 53 2 26.5 14.7 11.5 72% 231.0 119 6 19.8

DCSM 221 0017 245 1,065 19 56.1 9.7 7.0 77% 102.0 30 2 15.0 3.0 3.0 100% 57.0 19 1 19.0

DCSS 211 0023 212 918 37 24.8 21.0 21.0 71% 549.0 183 7 26.1 21.0 21.0 71% 552.0 184 7 26.3

DCSS 211 0024 212 424 28 15.1 24.2 24.2 93% 629.3 208 8 26.0 18.2 18.2 93% 476.2 157 6 26.2

DEDUC 211 0063 167 666 24 27.8 12.8 12.8 70% 217.0 115 7 16.4 13.3 13.3 46% 148.7 78 7 11.1

DEDUC 211 0063 170 836 9 92.9 10.2 4.6 170% 70.2 34 2 17.0 5.3 5.3 83% 40.1 15 2 7.5

FLL 222 0003 131 751 28 26.8 6.0 6.0 34% 57.0 19 2 9.5 3.0 3.0 29% 24.0 8 1 8.0

GEO 211 0015 111 1,096 40 27.4 16.0 16.0 72% 458.0 229 8 28.6 10.0 10.0 75% 298.0 149 5 29.8

GEO 211 0015 119 815 24 34.0 6.0 5.5 75% 98.5 34 2 17.0 10.1 10.1 73% 176.5 70 4 17.5



GEO 211 0015 G-07 1,020 24 42.5 2.2 1.5 88% 31.5 21 1 21.0 10.0 9.0 58% 124.5 56 4 14.0

GEO 211 0017 156 1,190 40 29.8 11.0 11.0 36% 159.0 47 3 15.7 3.0 3.0 30% 36.0 12 1 12.0

GEO 211 0017 242 754 20 37.7 4.0 3.0 40% 24.0 8 1 8.0 12.6 11.6 54% 124.2 46 4 11.5

GEO 221 0015 0106 571 16 35.7 2.0 2.0 94% 30.0 15 1 15.0 5.7 5.7 140% 127.4 44 2 22.0

LAI 211 0031 2105 2,550 42 60.7 9.7 9.7 41% 165.4 52 3 17.3 28.7 20.7 47% 410.4 139 7 19.9

MC 211 0011 G-15 744 20 37.2 31.6 20.7 73% 302.7 102 7 14.6

MUS 211 0024 0138 388 8 48.5 5.0 5.0 113% 45.0 9 1 9.0 5.0 5.0 163% 65.0 13 1 13.0

MUS 211 0024 141 390 12 32.5 3.0 3.0 92% 33.0 11 1 11.0

MUS 211 0024 232 416 17 24.5 8.3 8.3 71% 99.4 48 4 12.0 9.2 9.2 50% 79.2 43 5 8.6

MUS 211 0024 301 2,124 74 28.7 16.9 14.2 50% 526.3 200 5 40.0 21.4 16.5 46% 561.5 219 6 36.5

MUS 211 0024 329 560 6 93.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0 0

MUS 211 0024 331 1,898 80 23.7 24.8 13.6 33% 363.2 94 4 23.5 27.3 15.0 40% 476.7 136 5 27.2

MUS 221 0024 125 87 1 87.0

NURS 211 0032 214 1,528 36 42.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0

PHY 211 0021 108 857 13 65.9 7.0 7.0 119% 109.2 24 2 12.0

PHY 211 0021 201 855 30 28.5 28.1 21.6 82% 532.4 276 11 25.1 15.0 10.0 71% 214.0 107 5 21.4

PHY 211 0021 202 400 15 26.7 3.0 2.0 27% 8.0 4 1 4.0 3.0 1.5 13% 3.0 2 1 2.0

PHY 211 0021 203 860 30 28.7 30.0 18.0 72% 387.1 222 11 20.2 45.0 36.0 63% 679.0 337 18 18.7

SOC 250 0023 202 434 25 17.4 2.7 2.7 4% 2.7 1 1 1.0 3.7 3.7 32% 29.4 8 1 8.0

THEA 211 0010 105 1,114 20 55.7 11.1 11.1 57% 126.3 48 4 12.0 9.0 9.0 38% 69.0 23 3 7.7

THEA 211 0010 111 910 18 50.6 6.1 6.1 50% 54.9 18 2 9.0 6.0 6.0 81% 87.0 29 2 14.5

THEA 221 0010 102 885 12 73.8 3.0 3.0 58% 21.0 7 1 7.0 2.1 2.1 58% 14.5 7 1 7.0

classroom and class lab utilization study update...university of west georgia classroom and class...

Documents