classification mr. eric markland deputy director, ngen fleet implementation and transition team...

13
CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network Command and Control UNCLAS

Upload: tracy-tucker

Post on 16-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

CLASSIFICATION

Mr. Eric MarklandMr. Eric Markland

Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT)and Transition Team (FITT)

10 March 200910 March 2009

NGEN and the Future of Navy Network Command and Control

UNCLAS

Page 2: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

Did You Know

Information is the Ammo

Our portfolio:

• IO

• Intel

• Cyber

• Networks

• Communications

• Space

• Fleet C4 and Mod

• COMSEC

• Spectrum Management

Established in 2002, mission has evolved to include many different Echelons

NCMO

2005

NMSC

2005

NCMS

2005

USFF N6

2004

NAVSPACE

2002NAVCOMTELCOM

2002

Fleet Intel

2008

NNSOC

2006

NAVSECGRU

2005

2

Page 3: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

NETWARCOM’s Role

• Man, Train, and Equip for:– Information Technology– Networks– Cryptology– Information Operations– Space– Intelligence

• Lead Network Warfare & FORCEnet Enterprise (NNFE)

• Community Leadership & Management• FFC N6

13,604 personnel with 35 worldwide Commands/Detachments

• Operate, Maintain, and Defend Networks

• Operational Authority for Info Ops (EW, CNO, PSYOP, MILDEC, OPSEC IAW NWP 3-13)

• Conduct Space Operations• Serve as Functional Component

Commander to USSTRATCOM for Space, Info Ops & NetOps

Readiness Operations

3

Page 4: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS 4

NNE Alignment with GIG 2.0

CENTRIXS-M

Excepted Networks

ONE-NetBLII

ISNS

SCI Networks

NMCI

Enterprise networks are key to GIG 2.0

NNEToday

NCES

DKO

Enterprise Portal

Joint Enterprise

Data Strategy

DISA DECCS

Navy DECCS (DECC-N)

DoD DMZ

NNE SOA

Global NavalINTRANET

Attribute basedAccess

Strong AuthenticationSingle DoD Portal

DISN Core & TELEPORTBackbone

Central NNEGovernance under

JTF-GNO C2

Tactical Agility

GIG 2.0 “Top 5”

Common Policies& Standards

GlobalAuthenticationAccess Control

JointInfrastructure

Services“From the Edge”

Unity ofCommand

CANES

NGEN

Page 5: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

Next Generation Enterprise Network

The Next Generation Enterprise Network (NGEN) baseline will include the services currently offered on NMCI. NGEN will be an enterprise network that will provide secure, net-centric data and services to Navy and Marine Corps personnel. NGEN forms the foundation for the DON’s future Naval Network Environment (NNE) that will be interoperable with other Department of Defense (DoD) provided Net-Centric Enterprise Services.

5

Page 6: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

• Navy owned and managed network enables improvements in:

– Security • Compliance with National Security Agency IA Standards

• Ability to combat SIPRNet threats

– Warfighting Capability• Warfighter C2

• Ease of transition to new capability/application requirements

– Governance• Increased accountability for performance• Standardized business rules, infrastructure and architecture

– Adaptability• Enhanced responsiveness to increasingly dynamic requirements• Incorporates new technologies when and as required

– Reliability• Contingency/Disaster Recovery, Path Diversity, Data Storage

NGEN Tenets

6

Page 7: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

• Gain Government C2 of the network

– Initially provides continuity of NMCI-like services

– Employs common DON Enterprise Governance, Standards and Architecture

– Increases responsiveness to changes in DON business rules and operational warfighting requirements

– Re-aligns network capabilities to ensure joint requirements are met

– Enables industry proven, responsive, leading edge network security improvements

– Leverages industry expertise and proven standards (ITSM)

Why Change?

7

Page 8: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

What is Network C2?NetOps Framework

8

Page 9: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

Unified C2Exerting Control over IT Services

9

IT Service Management

NetOps functions are mapped to a framework for IT Service Management. The advantage of mapping the NetOps mission essential tasks into this framework is that processes, functions, and terminology are clearly defined and provide a common lexicon to describe NetOps processes and functions to vendors/contractors.

• IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL). ITIL will be used for individual certifications and to describe NetOps processes.

• ISO 20000. ISO 20000 compliance check sheet will be used to certify a command. ISO 20000 is fully consistent with the ITIL framework.

IT Service Management

NetOps functions are mapped to a framework for IT Service Management. The advantage of mapping the NetOps mission essential tasks into this framework is that processes, functions, and terminology are clearly defined and provide a common lexicon to describe NetOps processes and functions to vendors/contractors.

• IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL). ITIL will be used for individual certifications and to describe NetOps processes.

• ISO 20000. ISO 20000 compliance check sheet will be used to certify a command. ISO 20000 is fully consistent with the ITIL framework.

Network Control

NetOps requires the ability to direct and manage available resources, or allocate them to specific missions. The ability to exert control over these resources enables command functions, which is the ability to direct changes to resources as necessary to achieve a desired result within a specified timeframe.

• Network control is achieved with the ability to:– Prioritize responses to events/incidents/problems

using event/incident/problem management processes– Closure of events and incidents using event and

incident management processes– Establish policies and direct changes in response to

cyber threats or attacks using information security management processes

– Direct move, add, changes (MACs) using change management processes

– Grant/revoke access to IT services using access management processes

– Establish criteria for and/or direct the implementation of continuity of operations activities using IT service continuity management processes

Network Control

NetOps requires the ability to direct and manage available resources, or allocate them to specific missions. The ability to exert control over these resources enables command functions, which is the ability to direct changes to resources as necessary to achieve a desired result within a specified timeframe.

• Network control is achieved with the ability to:– Prioritize responses to events/incidents/problems

using event/incident/problem management processes– Closure of events and incidents using event and

incident management processes– Establish policies and direct changes in response to

cyber threats or attacks using information security management processes

– Direct move, add, changes (MACs) using change management processes

– Grant/revoke access to IT services using access management processes

– Establish criteria for and/or direct the implementation of continuity of operations activities using IT service continuity management processes

Objective:Define critical NetOps control functions within an IT service

management framework

Page 10: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

Shared Situational Awareness

10

Shared situational awareness

Near real time information on the status of IT services and supported commands improves the quality and timeliness of collaborative decision-making regarding the employment, protection and defense of the network

• Situational Awareness is achieved with:– Service level status from service level

management processes– Threat reporting from information security

management processes– Vulnerability assessment from information

security management processes– Event/Incident/Problem status from

event/incident/problem management processes– GIG/Service network status

Shared situational awareness

Near real time information on the status of IT services and supported commands improves the quality and timeliness of collaborative decision-making regarding the employment, protection and defense of the network

• Situational Awareness is achieved with:– Service level status from service level

management processes– Threat reporting from information security

management processes– Vulnerability assessment from information

security management processes– Event/Incident/Problem status from

event/incident/problem management processes– GIG/Service network status

Network Common Operational Picture (NETCOP) synthesizes current performance of IT services, operations, and threats into an integrated picture that supports both NetOps commanders as well as operational commanders by reporting the status, threat, vulnerability, and mission impact of degradation in a manner tailored to their areas of responsibility/interest.

Network Common Operational Picture (NETCOP) synthesizes current performance of IT services, operations, and threats into an integrated picture that supports both NetOps commanders as well as operational commanders by reporting the status, threat, vulnerability, and mission impact of degradation in a manner tailored to their areas of responsibility/interest.

Objective:A common set of reporting

procedures, tools, and standards to share situational awareness

information in near real-time with relevant decision-makers.

Page 11: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS 11

NETWARCOM Role During TransitionNGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT)

• Mission Statement:

The NGEN FITT exists to develop, maintain and promulgate a coordinated executable strategy to ensure effective transition from NMCI to NGEN

• Purpose:

– Support the short- and long-term goals and objectives of the Naval Networking Environment (NNE) 2016 Strategy

– Provide guidance and assistance to transition from NMCI to NGEN

– Act as the NGEN Stakeholder Communications Lead for the Fleet

– Persistent NNWC LNO physically located at the SPO

• Objectives:

– Define detailed Command and Control (C2) functions through Early Transition Activities (ETA)

– Prevent network disruptions during roll-out

– Develop operational and user processes and coordinate training

– Minimize impact on DON warfighter mission and users

Page 12: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS 12

NETWARCOM Role During TransitionNGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT)

• Stand-up Global Network C2 structure for NGEN

• Developing the personnel, processes and tools needed to support NGEN NetOps requirements and capabilities

– Visibility into the health and status of NGEN operations

– Ability to associate performance issues with specific NGEN segment

– Focus on network defense activities

– Development of tools and processes to exercise C2 over NGEN

• Implement global, regional, and local NetOps authorities under NGEN as documented in the signed NGEN NetOps CONOPS

NetOps CONOPS signed by VADM Starling (NETWARCOM), VADM Edwards (OPNAV N6), and BGEN Allen (HQMC C4)

Page 13: CLASSIFICATION Mr. Eric Markland Deputy Director, NGEN Fleet Implementation and Transition Team (FITT) 10 March 2009 NGEN and the Future of Navy Network

UNCLAS

Summary

• Starting with NGEN, DON is working towards implementing the NNE

• NETWARCOM’s FITT is leading operational transition from NMCI to NGEN

• Three major pre-Transition efforts will effect NETWARCOM and its Commanders

– Stand-up of the Global NetOps C2 structure for NGEN

– Development of People, Processes and Tools for operational control

– Implementation of Open Standards for IT Service Management (ITSM) and employment of industry-proven ITIL framework

NETWARCOM and its Commanders will retain Operational C2 of the network under NGEN. Preparation starts now.

13