class inquiry project: starter, continued astro 289: adaptive optics class session #9 february 7,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Class Inquiry Project:
Starter, continued
Astro 289: Adaptive Optics
Class Session #9
February 7, 2013
Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series of activities
![Page 2: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Purpose of Starter: To introduce existing AO systems and get you thinking about science
goals and design choices
1. Comparing/contrasting several different AO systems and their results when imaging the same extrasolar planetary system (HR 8799)
2. Discussion
3. Goal-driven design: iterative
• Science Case Performance Requirements
4. Expectations for final presentation / mini-CoDR
![Page 3: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
System
AO System/Sci
ence Camera
Special Observational Techniques
λ observed
Other
HR8799
Planets imaged
(b/c/d/e)
SED (Temp of planets)
(Yes/No)
Orbits/ Positions (Yes/No)
Planet masses
(Yes/No)Other
LBTFLAO/
PISCESADI/2D star subtraction
H, Ks b,c,d,e No Yes Discussion80+% Strehl
KeckKeck
AO/NIRC2ADI, LOCI H, K, L S-H b,c,d,e Yes Yes b,c,d
Subaru AO188/IRCS
PSF subtraction, spectroscopy (depending on
target)
J, H, K60%NGS
30%-50% LGS
(2 other giant
planets)No
Yes (for 8799? Other
systems?)
Yes for Hat-P-7b (1.8
jupiter masses)
Now using HiCIAO
MMT MMTAO PSF subtractions3.8mic, 3.1, 4.8
b,c,d Yes Yes
PalomarPALAO/IR
camera
Vector vortex coronagraph+LO
CI
2.2 microns
Inner working angle =2λ/D
b,c,d none b90+% Strehl
VLTNACO/
CONICAc at Lp; b, c,
d at K
Observations Details
Science Results
PSF subtraction, coronagraphs, …
![Page 4: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
SystemTelescopeDiameter
Site/ro DM and dof WFS TypeFrame Rate
WFS Camera
Type
AO Bench location
(Cassegrain? Nasmyth?)
Other
LBT 8.4Mt.
Graham 627 ASM Pyramid kHz E2V
Bent Gregorian
Keck 10 Mauna Kea 249 S-HCCD-39 3 lenslet
arrays
Subaru 8.2 Mauna Kea188
bimorph
Curvature 188
lenslets1 kHz
S-H LOWFS: 16
APDsHOWFS
188 APDs
Nasmyth (IR)
MMT 6.5 336 ASM S-H
Palomar 5/1.5Mt Palomar 30-50cm at
K241
S-H, E2V detector
2 kHzVisible 3x3
S-HCass
VLT 8.2Paranal, 60
cm at K185
S-H, 14x14 or
7x7CCD
AO System Parameters
![Page 5: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Here are what images of HR 8799 with these AO systems look like
5
![Page 6: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
![Page 7: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hubble NICMOS H-band 1.6 microns
7
![Page 8: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
LBT H-band (1.6 microns) and 3.3 microns
8
H band
![Page 9: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MMT AO 3.8 micronsTwo versions
9
![Page 10: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
VLT NACO AOKs band 2.2 microns
10
![Page 11: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Subaru ICRS AOJ (1.2 microns) and z (1.0 microns) bands
11
![Page 12: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Spitzer Space TelescopeDebris disk at 70 microns
12
![Page 13: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Discussion about comparative AO
Which AO system would you use for HR8799? What science would you be aiming at?
Which AO system would you use for finding other types of planets?
Why did they use different DM’s?
Why did they use different WFS’s?
![Page 14: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Where are we going with this?
1. Flow Chart for Goal-Driven Design
2. Defining your Performance Requirements
3. Expectations for your Project at class presentation (“mini-CoDR”)
![Page 15: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15This slide based on flow charts and concepts from O. Guyon’s talk on AO system design: Astronomy at 2009 CfAO AO Summer School at
UCSC, R. Parenti’s chapter 2 in AO Engineering Handbook ed. R. Tyson 2000, and J. Hardy chapter 9 AO for astronomical telescopes 1998.
Goal-driven design: Design AO system/select AO components based on science goals
Field of viewSky coverage PSF quality/Strehl requirement
Residual wavefront errorGuide star Beam size
Fitting errorWavefront sensor noise Time delay
Science CasePerformance Requirements and Science λ
G.S. magnitude bandwidth # subaps
Reference“Star"
WavefrontSensor
ControlSystem
DeformableMirror
Optics
![Page 16: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Performance Requirements: Example
(Step 1) Science Case
(Step 2) Performance Requirements -- Physical Parameters
(Step 3) Performance Requirements -- Observables to Measure
How many brown dwarfs are orbiting stars in the Hyades cluster?
• Parameter space for search: Brown dwarf dist. 5 - 250 AU from parent sta.
• Minimum (and faintest) brown dwarf mass: 0.003 x Msun (L / T dwarf transition)
• Contrast ratio between planet and star: 10-4 at close separations
• Search space: 0.1-10 arc seconds from parent star.
• Sensitivity limit: H-band magnitude~13
• Contrast between planet and star: ΔH~10 magnitudes (factor of 104)
Notes:
1 AU = distance from earth to Sun
H band is centered at a wavelength of 1.6 microns
Magnitude: “Faintness" as viewed from Earth.
![Page 17: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Defining Performance Requirements based on Goal
• Resources:– Advisors
• Your research advisor/colleagues/professors• Or we can put you in touch with an AO instrumentation expert in
your field – ask us!
– White Papers for astronomy teams:• Astro 2010 Decadal Survey:
– Science White Papers:» http://sites.nationalacademies.org/BPA/BPA_050603
– Instrument White Papers:» http://sites.nationalacademies.org/BPA/BPA_049522
• Planetary Science White Papers:– http://www8.nationalacademies.org/ssbsurvey/publicview.aspx
• Iterate with me by email.
![Page 18: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Goal-driven design: Starting with science goal vs. starting with performance requirements
• What if you optimize your AO system to do the best on your science goal?
• Science goal:– Image exoplanets– How frequent are Jupiter-
type exoplanets seen around solar-type stars?
• Leads to:– What might be the
outcome of this design?
• What if you optimize your AO system to get the best performance?
• Performance requirement:– Get best possible contrast
(dynamic range)– What is the faintest planet
we can image next to a bright star?
• Leads to:– What might be the
outcome of this design?
![Page 19: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Goal-driven design: Starting with science goal vs. starting with performance requirements
• What if you optimize your AO system to do the best on your science goal?
• Science goal:– Image exoplanets– How frequent are Jupiter-
type exoplanets seen around solar-type stars?
• Leads to:– Observing hundreds of
nearby stars and counting which ones have Jupiter-type exoplanets orbiting them.
• What if you optimize your AO system to get the best performance?
• Performance requirement:– Get best possible contrast
(dynamic range)– What is the faintest planet
we can image next to a bright star?
• Leads to:– This AO system would need
such a bright natural guide star to measure the wavefront that it could only observe the ~10 brightest nearby stars that exist.
![Page 20: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Expectations for Final Project Presentations: mini-CoDR
(CoDR = Conceptual Design Review)
![Page 21: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Conceptual Design Review (CoDR)
• Basic science goal and performance requirements
• Purpose: Demonstrate feasibility of design to solve problem/answer question
• Describe system and sub-components but doesn’t have to show they’re the best design
• Identify areas of technical risk, for example new technologies or techniques
http://www.ing.iac.es/~docs/wht/naomi/wht-naomi-87/wht-naomi-87.html
![Page 22: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Keck Observatory Development Process
22Conceptual Design
![Page 23: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
mini-CoDR Expectations1. Instrument name
2. Science goals
3. Performance requirements flowing from science goals
4. Proposed telescope/location
5. DM (type, dof)
6. WFS (type, sensitivity, # subapertures)
7. Science instrument (IR imager, optical spectrograph, …)
8. Block diagram of AO system
9. Type and magnitude of reference “star” (natural, laser)
10. Field of view
11. Wavefront error budget
12. Describe the main risks
![Page 24: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Bonus @ mini-CoDR
1. Acronym for your AO system/instrument
2. Logo (!)
3. Roles: Principle Investigator (PI), Project Scientist, Project Manager
4. Optical layout
5. Observing plan/how data will be gathered
6. Plan for data reduction/pipeline
7. Project timeline
8. Estimate total project cost
![Page 25: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Project Due Dates1. Feb 8: Science Case. Finish iterating with me. (But
can re-visit as design proceeds.)
2. Feb 14: Performance Requirements - First draft due. Iterate with me, especially if you need more help than White Papers and local experts. Final version will be due in class for Focused Investigation 2/21.
3. Feb 21: Focused Investigation: In class. We’ll go from Performance Requirements to AO System Design, using spreadsheet tools.
4. March 7: Mini-CoDR In class. 10-minute presentations by each team.
5. March 12: Synthesis discussion in class
6. March 12: Write-up Due
![Page 26: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
FYI
Project Management Overview
![Page 27: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Project Management: Levels of Design Reviews
1. Conceptual Design Review (CoDR)– a.k.a. Feasibility Design Review
2. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
3. Critical Design Review (CDR)
4. Pre-Ship Review
5. Integration and Testing
6. Commissioning
7. Facility-Class Instrument
Note: Terminology and definitions are
approximate, and vary from community to
community
![Page 28: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Conceptual Design Review (CoDR)
• Basic science goal and performance requirements
• Purpose: Demonstrate feasibility of design to solve problem/answer question
• Describe system and sub-components but doesn’t have to show they’re the best design
• Identify areas of technical risk, for example new technologies or techniques
http://www.ing.iac.es/~docs/wht/naomi/wht-naomi-87/wht-naomi-87.html
![Page 29: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Preliminary Design Review
• Detailed science goal and performance requirements• Operational requirements/constraints• Timeline/plan for building• Details about instrument design• Cost/budget• Alternate choices under consideration• Plan for mitigating risks
http://www.ing.iac.es/~docs/wht/naomi/wht-naomi-87/wht-naomi-87.html
![Page 30: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Critical Design Review
• Full designs for individual components
• Full design for system
• Detailed plan for building
• Timelines and Gantt charts
• Budget review
• Scale models
• Simulations
http://www.ing.iac.es/~docs/wht/naomi/wht-naomi-87/wht-naomi-87.html
![Page 31: Class Inquiry Project: Starter, continued Astro 289: Adaptive Optics Class Session #9 February 7, 2013 Thanks to Katie Morzinski for developing this series](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649ebd5503460f94bc6290/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Final Stages• Pre-Ship Review
– Do subsystem components meet spec? Are they ready to ship to telescope?
• Integration and Testing– Put all components together and run performance
tests under realistic observing conditions
• Commissioning– On-sky testing of anything that couldn’t be tested in
lab, and in regular observing mode
• Facility-class Instrument– At this stage, the instrument is finished “engineerin
g” and is now ready for “science” by the wider user community!