clare lockhart, the best and the worst of aid

14
The Best and The Worst International engagement and national leadership in fragile/ failed states Clare Lockhart 5 March 2010

Upload: nyu-development-research-institute

Post on 29-Nov-2014

1.613 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

The Best and The Worst

International engagement and national leadership in fragile/ failed states

Clare Lockhart5 March 2010

Page 2: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid
Page 3: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

November 13, 2001

Page 4: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

The Worst

• Afghanistan• Haiti• Kosovo• Pakistan• Sudan• Somalia

Page 5: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

The Syndrome• Thousands of projects, dozens of systems• Technical Assistance vs vocational training• Parallel Bureaucracies• Multiple layers of contracting• Wages Disparities• Double Standards: failure of UN agencies, NGOs

private companies to provide information of accounts

• The so-called “coordination problem”• Stove-piping: security, development, economics,

politics, humanitarian issues all dealt with separately

• The “blank slate” syndrome• Ignoring the balance state/ market: all state or

all market

Fragments rule of lawMarginalize national &

local leadersDuplication, substitution“salami-slicing”Leaching human capitalCulture of duplicity

Imports further layers of bureaucracy

entrenching the problems

Marginalizes citizensPuts domestic companies

at a disadvantage

Page 6: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Root: Double Failure• An international "aid complex" with no accountability either to citizens of

the supposed beneficiary countries or to taxpayer countries

• UN agency contracts and programs do not provide accounts to governing boards, donor countries or citizen-beneficiaries- allowing for cycle of non-delivery: rely on ever-increasing appeals to fund HQ costs

• NGOs fragmented and no agreed upon standards for accountability

• Governments not accountable to their citizens, no agreed upon standards for accountability

Page 7: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

The Best• Singapore• Spain• Portugal• Ireland• US South• Chile• Peru• Accession Countries• Gulf countries• Mozambique• Botswana• Rwanda

Page 8: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Successful transformations

1960 2000

The Singaporean economy has grown by a factor of almost 260 within one generation

Page 9: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Characteristics and Drivers

• Leadership and management

• National Accountability systems

• Investment in vocational training & higher education

• Investment in domestic firm creation and jobs

• Creation of citizenship rights and obligations

• Getting financing flows right

Page 10: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Application to Challenging Contexts

• Leadership: the political process and settlement, creating the space for new leadership

• National Accountability Systems: sequencing the creation of accountability

• Investment in the next generation

• Investment in a few key economic sectors

• Delivering social services through policy frameworks and platforms: National Programs

• Trust Funds and new approaches to financing

Page 11: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid
Page 12: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

sequencemap existing assetsleverage networks + hierarchies

currency

telecoms

rural

Page 13: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Delivering Services • Afghanistan: ARTF, National Accountability Systems and National Programs

• National Programs, elsewhere:– Indonesia– Mexico– Brazil– Nepal

Page 14: Clare Lockhart, The Best and the Worst of Aid

Next steps?

• Movement and standards for accountability (from left and right)

• Scrutinize the aid complex• Scrutinize government budgets• Collect stories on, and codify, what works • Focus on leaders and managers and their

stories • Ask them