claims are debatable or controversial statements/assertions you hope to prove evidence and reasons...
TRANSCRIPT
Toulmin Examples
Claims are debatable or controversial statementsassertions you hope to prove
Evidence and Reasons Claim
A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo
1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims
Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data
ReasonsSo Claim
Since Warrant
Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons
Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is
good OR ___________ is bad
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Claims are debatable or controversial statementsassertions you hope to prove
Evidence and Reasons Claim
A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo
1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims
Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data
ReasonsSo Claim
Since Warrant
Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons
Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is
good OR ___________ is bad
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
A claim answers the question ldquowhat should we dordquo
1048707A surprisingly large number of arguments donrsquot have claims ldquoThe President is dumbrdquo ldquoOur taxes are too highrdquo or ldquoThe war is immoralrdquo are all examples of arguments without claims
Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data
ReasonsSo Claim
Since Warrant
Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons
Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is
good OR ___________ is bad
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data
ReasonsSo Claim
Since Warrant
Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons
Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is
good OR ___________ is bad
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Warrants are the unstated (or stated) assumptions or agreements you can rely on your audience making in order to believe your reasons
Warrants support reasonsThey can be oversimplified to ___________ is
good OR ___________ is bad
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
ExampleVending machines should be removed from
campus because they promote unhealthy eating habits and cause classroom distractions
Warrant 1= Unhealthy eating habits hurt students
Warrant 2= Classroom distractions are undesirable
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
ExamplesADOT needs to widen the I-17 now because
traffic congestion has worsened and fatal accidents have increased
Warrant 1= Traffic congestion is badWarrant 2= People dying is worsebull Everyone should be able to express their
religious beliefs because it is their right to do soWarrant 1= if it is a right we should be able to do it (also-
religious expression is a right)
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
ExamplesThe NBA should accept players out of high
school because players like Lebron James and Kobe Bryant are beneficial to teams
Warrant 1= Talented players who benefit teams are
important enough to society that we can overlook the ageeducation factor
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Warrants tell you what arguments you have to make and at what level you have to make them
The mushroom is poisonous So do not
eat it
Since eating poisonous things is dangerous
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
More examplesSmoking causes serious diseases in smokers and endangers non-smokers as well
So the federal government should ban smoking
Since the Constitution was established to ldquopromote the general welfarerdquo and citizens are thus entitled to protection from the harmful acts of others
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
More examplesI have been drinking since age 14 without a problems
So the legal age for drinking should be lowered
What works for me should work for everyone else
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
BackingAdditional support or proof you might need to
prove your reasons are good if your warrant is shaky or arguable
Example Violent music lyrics cause violent behavior because they cause people to think in violent ways
Warrant= Does the warrant need backingCould the claim be qualifiedHow
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
More examplesFill in the Reasons and Identify the Backing
NASA should launch a human expedition to Mars because Americans need a unifying national goal
What unifies the nation should be a national priority
On a personal level Americans want to be a part of something bigger than themselves (Emotional appeal)
In a country as diverse as the US common purposes and values help make a nation stronger (Ethical appeal)
In the past enterprises such as westward expansion WWII and the Apollo moon program enabled many (though not at all) Americans to work toward common goals (Logical appeal as evidence)
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Fill in the blanks
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
If the federal govrsquot can spend huge amounts of $ on the military it can afford to spend moderate amounts on arts programs
A country that can fund expensive programs can also afford less expensive programs
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Fill in the blanks
In most cases people who donrsquot go to college earn less money than those who do
(Emotional appeal)
(Ethical appeal)
(Logical appeal as evidence)
Vanessa went to NAU and makes $50000year while Jonny went to work right after graduating from SDOHS and makes $20000year
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Using QualifiersFewIt is possibleRarelyIt seemsSomeIt may beMore or lessIn some casesManyRoutinely
MostOne may argueOftenPerhapsPossiblyUnder these conditionsFor the most partIf it were so
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Conditions of RebuttalPotential objections to the argumentclaimClaim- The federal govrsquot should support the
arts because it also supports the militaryWarrant- If the federal govrsquot can support the
military it can also support other programsRebuttal-The federal govrsquot is constitutionally
obligated to fund the military Support for public TV or a local dance troop is hardly in the same league
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
ConcessionAcknowledging a part of the opposing
argument that can not be refutedRebuttal follows the concession but uses it to
build upon or further onersquos OWN claimExample It is true that SB1070 is a deterrent
to illegal immigrants who might cross through Arizona However the additional manpower needed to enforce the law will allow other crimes to go unpursued
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Outline of the Toulmin ModelClaim- The federal govrsquot should ban smokingQualifier- The ban would be limited to public spacesReason- Smoking causes disease in smokers Non-
smokers are endangered by second hand smokeWarrant- The Constitution promises ldquoto promote the
general welfarerdquo And citizens are entitled to protection from harmful actions by others
Backing- The US is based on a political system that is suppose to serve the basic needs of its people including their health
Evidence- 102002 deaths attributed to second hand smoke in 2010 Lawsuit won against Camel Cigarettes citing the need for smoking related health costs
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Authority- Surgeon general Doctor scientistConcession- The ban applies to public places smokers can
smoke in private or designated areasRebuttal- Smokers have rights too Smoking laws should
be left to the individual states
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-
Now read an example passage Read ldquoTesting Speech CodesrdquoAnnotateidentify the Toulmin terms in the
passage
- Toulmin Examples
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Example
- Examples
- Examples (2)
- Slide 9
- More examples
- More examples (2)
- Backing
- More examples (3)
- Fill in the blanks
- Fill in the blanks (2)
- Using Qualifiers
- Conditions of Rebuttal
- Concession
- Outline of the Toulmin Model
- Slide 20
- Now read an example passage
-