cl presentation vers 2.1

Upload: monkey85222

Post on 03-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    1/25

    EBM Question C/L

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    2/25

    Delirium Definition

    Delirium is a neuropsychiatric disordercharacterized by disturbances of

    Consciousness

    Attention

    Cognition

    Perception

    With an abrupt onset and fluctuating course

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    3/25

    Delirium is Common

    Delirium usually has an underlyingphysiological etiology

    In a general hospital setting the occurrenceof Delirium may approach

    30% in medically ill patients

    40% in the hospitalized elderly

    85% in cancer patients and for those withterminal illness

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    4/25

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    5/25

    APA Guidelines in the Treatment ofDelirium

    (i) the identification of underlying etiologies

    (ii) appropriate medical intervention to treatreversible etiologies

    (iii) initiation of environmental interventionsto provide safety and support

    (iv) relief of distressing symptomswith antipsychotics

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    6/25

    Antipsychotic Delirium TreatmentRecommendations @ URMC

    Haldol (IV or PO) Has historically been the treatment for delirium

    Seroquel Ideally Treats delirium and provides sedation without significant

    EPS

    Abilify (once patient was already onAbilify)

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    7/25

    Case

    Patient with bipolar d/o presenting withhyperactive delirium (but not in a manicepisode).

    Was on Abilify 15 mg

    Recommendation go up to 20 mg

    Patient improved clinically

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    8/25

    Intriguing case?

    Somewhat surprised the intervention ofincreasing Abilify from 15 mg to 20 mgworked

    Lack of experience using or hearing aboutAbilify (specifically) used for delirium

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    9/25

    Intriguing case?

    Abilify differs from all other antipsychoticsby being a partial agonist (not a D2blocker). . .

    Mechanism by which antipsychotics treatdelirium unclear

    By being a partial D2 agonist could there bea difference could there be a difference inefficacy for treating delirium?

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    10/25

    PICO Question

    Patient population: Delirious patients

    Intervention: Abilify

    Comparison: Other antipsychotics (non partial

    agonists either FGA or SGA)

    Outcome: Resolution of Delirium

    In patients with delirium, is Abilify as effective asother anti-psychotics in clearing the delirium?

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    11/25

    Article

    Aripiprazole and haloperidol in thetreatment of delirium

    Soenke Boettger , Miriam Friedlander, William Breitbart

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 45:477 482

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    12/25

    Article Aim

    To further explore the efficacy andtolerability of Abilify (as compared withHaldol) in the treatment of delirium

    Previous studies on this topic include a singlepublished case series and two published casereports examining the safety & tolerability of

    Abilify Results from these studies showed a significant

    reduction in symptoms of delirium

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    13/25

    Methods

    This paper performed a secondary analysison patients with delirium who received

    Abilify and then compared this data to a

    case matched sample of subjects treatedwith Haldol.

    Retrospective chart review

    Essentially they compared reduction inMDAS scores between Haldol / Abilify.

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    14/25

    MDAS - Memorial DeliriumAssessment Scale

    10-item, four-point (0-3), clinician-rated scaleThe MDAS items reflect the diagnostic criteria for

    delirium in the DSM-IV-TR and assess disturbancein arousal and level of consciousness, cognitive

    functioning (memory, attention, orientation, andperceptual disturbances) and psychomotoractivity.

    MDAS scores greater than 10 identified the

    presence of deliriumMDAS scores of less than 10 indicated the

    resolution of delirium in this analysis

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    15/25

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    16/25

    Limitations

    Paper based on retrospective analysis of prospectivelycollected data (Level 4 Evidence).

    Selection of neuroleptic based on psychiatrists preference

    Severely agitated patients were excluded from the analysis

    21 Patients in each medication group (not a large analysis)

    This paper acknowledged the need for further randomized,double blind, controlled studies.

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    17/25

    Evidence Based Strength

    Quality Type of Evidence 1a Systematic review of RCTs 1b Individual RCT (with narrow

    confidence interval) 2a Systematic review of cohort

    studies 2b Individual cohort study 3 Case control studies4 Case Series (retrospective

    chart review) 5 (Worst) Expert Opinion, Editorials

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    18/25

    Strengths

    Authors attempted to case match patientstreated with Abilify to those treated withHaldol with both groups having similar:

    Age

    Initial MDAS Scores

    Similar etiologies of delirium

    Similar ratios of subtypes of delirium:Hypoactive / hyperactive delirium were

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    19/25

    Strengths

    Analysis was not sponsored by apharmaceutical company.

    Although some of the authors had received

    grants from companies such as Lilly andPurdue-Pharma none reported affiliations toBristol-Myers Squibb(Abilify pharmaceuticalcompany)

    The authors alone are responsible for thecontent and writing of the paper.

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    20/25

    Analysis MDAS Scores

    Abilify

    Time 1: 18.1

    Time 2: 10.8

    Time 3: 8.3

    Haldol

    Time 1: 19.9

    Time 2: 9.9

    Time 3: 6.8***No significant difference in MDAS scores ***

    At times 2 and times 3

    Time 2: 48 72 h later

    Time 3: 7 days later

    Time 2: 48 72 h later

    Time 3: 7 days later

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    21/25

    Analysis of Safety: Side effects

    Abilify none

    Haldol EPS (parkinsonism and dystonia).More likely at higher doses

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    22/25

    Article Conclusions

    There was no significant difference in theability of Abilify to ameliorate the symptomsof delirium more effectively than haloperidol

    at time points T2 and T3 in either subtypeof delirium, hypoactive or hyperactive.

    OR

    Abilify may be as effective as haloperidol inthe management of delirium and itssubtypes

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    23/25

    Article Conclusions

    Abilify demonstrated an advantage intolerability by the absence of extrapyramidalside effects.

    This article alluded to the conclusion thatAbilify, in general, is a better choice over Haldolsimply because it has less incidence of EPS.

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    24/25

    My Conclusions

    At this time given the available evidence (althoughof lower grade) it seems reasonable to believethat Abilify and Haldol likely have relatively similar

    efficacies in treating delirium. However, moreresearch is needed.

    Again noting: this study was not strong enough toconclude this definitively (it was not a superiority trial,

    equivalence trial, a non-inferiority trial OR even a trial atall [it was a retrospective chart review])

  • 7/27/2019 CL Presentation Vers 2.1

    25/25