civil engineering institute of concrete structures an …
TRANSCRIPT
This report contains 14 pages. The shortened or partial reproduction or duplication of this report requires the approval of the Institute of Concrete Structures and Structural Engineering of the TU Kaiserslautern.
CIVIL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AN
STRUCTURAL ENGENEERING
Prof. Dr. – Ing. Matthias Pahn
Paul-Ehrlich-Straße Gebäude 14, Zimmer 570
67663 Kaiserslautern Telephone (0631) 205 – 3083
Telefax (0631) 205 – 3555 e-mail: [email protected]
Project 17059MLK/14511: Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
Client: RABDION LTD. 24 HaMa´as St Jerusalem, Israel
Contact: Stefan Harenberg M.Sc. [email protected]
www.massivbau-kl.de
Date: 09.02.2018
___________________________ ___________________________
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Matthias Pahn Stefan Harenberg M.Sc.
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 2 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
Contents
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3
2. Test program .................................................................................................................. 4
3. Test setup ....................................................................................................................... 5
4. Test specimen ................................................................................................................ 7
5. Evaluation of results ....................................................................................................... 8
6. Fracture state ............................................................................................................... 11
7. Summary ...................................................................................................................... 13
8. Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 14
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 3 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
1. Introduction
The company RABDION LTD. commissioned the Institute of Concrete Structures and Structural
Engineering of the Technical University Kaiserslautern to carry out tensile tests on bars of Glass Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (GFRP). Tensile tests are performed on the nominal diameter d = 32 mm.
During the tests, the force and the change in length are measured and documented to calculate the
force, young’s modulus, tensile strength and elongation.
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 4 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
2. Test program
The test program consists of 3 tensile tests and is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Test program
Test program
Diameter Material Test type Basis Result Number of tests
Sample ID
32 mm GFRP Tensile
test
According to: ISO 10406
young modulus,
Force, tensile strength,
elongation.
3
RABDION _GFRP_32_1
RABDION _GFRP_32_2
RABDION _GFRP_32_3
The GFRP bars are glued in steel tubes. The test specimens are stored and tested under laboratory
conditions at approx. 22 ° C and 60% relative humidity.
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 5 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
3. Test setup
The test setup is according to ISO 10406-1 [1].
Figure 1: Test setup in according to ISO 10406-1 [1]
For the tensile test, the specimens are inserted centrally with clamping wedges in the tensile testing
machine. The force is introduced between clamping wedges and testing machine via spherical calotte
③. As a result, the specimens are freely rotary to the testing machine (see Figure 3).
The testing rate is 15 mm / min [1]. The force is measured by a load cell 1000 kN (MS 1.3.33) and the
length change of the rod with an extensometer ⑤ mounted in the middle of the bar (see Figure 2).
The extensometer (MS 1.7.1) has a clamping length of 50 mm.
① Load introduction frame
② Load introduction element
③ Clamping wedges+ spherical calotte
④ Test specimen
⑤ Extensometer
①
②
③
④
⑤
F
F
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 6 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
Figure 2: Extensometer on the centre of the test specimen
Figure 3: ① load introduction frame, ② load cell, ③ spherical calotte, ④clamping wedges,
⑤ load introduction pipe
②
③
④
①
⑤
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 7 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
4. Test specimen
Figure 4 shows the geometry of the test specimen. The bars are made out of GFRP which have
surface shaped in form of helical ribs. The bars have a nominal diameter ØN of 32 mm and have a
measured core diameter Øc of ≈ 31 mm (see Figure 4). The core diameter is the mean value of three
measurements along the length of the bars.
Figure 4: Geometry of the test specimen
A visual inspection reveals that the bars are straight and have no initial deflection. Figure 5a) and b)
shows on of the bars glued into the load introduction pipe and mounted in the testing machine.
a) b)
Figure 5 a),b): bar mounted in the testing machine
Øc ≈ 31mm
ØN = 32mm
1100 mm 1100 mm 1000 mm
3200 mm
Ø = 57 mm Ø = 57 mm Øc ≈ 31 mm
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 8 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
5. Test results
In according to ISO 10406 the young-modulus is calculated from the difference between the load level
at 20% and 50% of the maximum tensile strength. Because the maximum tensile strength wasn’t
known, the first bar was loaded up to 410 kN on the basis of existing results from other Tensile tests
(see Figure 6 – curve: R.GFRP_32_1-y.m.).
Figure 6: Cylinderforce-stroke behaviour
As the extensometer is a contacting measuring instrument, it must be removed before the specimen
breaks. To remove the extensometer, the bar was relieved to 2 kN. Thereafter the bar was loaded up
to fracture (see Figure 6 – curve: R.GFRP_32_1-fract.). Therefore, the length change is not measured
until failure. It has been shown that the load up to 400 kN is convenient for the test of the young-
modulus. Therefore the other bars were tested in the same way. The non-linear gradient of the young-
modulus test curves (y.m.) results from the slippage of the clamping wedges and the alignment of the
spherical calotte.
The stress is calculated from the force F and the core area A as follows:
𝜎 =𝐹
𝐴 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]
The elongation is calculated from the length change and the initial length of the extensometer (l=50
mm) as follows:
𝜀 =∆𝑙
𝑙∙ 100 [%]
R.GFRP_32_1-fract.
R.GFRP_32_1-y.m.
R.GFRP_32_2-fract.
R.GFRP_32_2-y.m.
R.GFRP_32_3-fract.
R.GFRP_32_3-y.m.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Cyl
ind
erfo
rce
[kN
]
Cylinderstroke [mm]
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 9 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
The young’s modulus is calculated as follows [1]:
𝐸 =∆𝜎
∆𝜀 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]
Unmeasured elongation is extrapolated up to break. The elongation at fracture 𝜀𝑢 is calculated as
follows [1]:
𝜀𝑢 =𝐹𝑓
𝐸 ∙ 𝐴 ∙ 100 [%]
For the evaluation of the results the tensile stress, elongation and young modulus are calculated from
the measured data and the stress-strain behaviour is shown in Figure 7. The young modulus is
calculated from the difference between the load level at 20% and 50% of the maximum tensile strength
[1] (see Figure 7 – curve: Calc. young-modulus). The dotted curves (extrapolated 𝜀𝑢) show the stress-
strain behaviour up to the linear extrapolated elongation at fracture.
Figure 7: Stress-strain behaviour
R.GFRP_32_1 Calc. young-modulus
R.GFRP_32_2 Calc. young-modulus
R.GFRP_32_3 Calc. young-modulus
R.GFRP_32_1 extrapolated εu
R.GFRP_32_2 extrapolated εu
R.GFRP_32_3 extrapolated εu
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Ten
sile
str
engt
h [
Mp
a]
Elongation [‰]
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 10 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
Table 2 shows the results overview of the tensile tests:
Table 2: Results overview
1 Measured with slide gauge (see chapter 4) 2 linear extrapolated value with calculated young-modulus
Results overview
Sample ID Core
diameter 1
Maximum
force
Tensile
strength
Young
modulus
Elongation
at failure 2
[-] [mm] [kN] [MPa] [MPa] [%]
RABDION _GFRP_32_1 30,94 627,6 834,7 54874,4 1,52
RABDION _GFRP_32_2 30,71 591,7 798,9 55509,5 1,44
RABDION _GFRP_32_3 31,08 642,0 846,3 46836,6 1,81
Mean value 30,91 620,5 826,6 52406,8 1,59
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 11 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
6. Fracture state
The fracture of the bars occurred in all of the test specimens in the free length (see Figure 8). The
bonding between the glass fiber and the resin was fractured up to the load introduction (see Figure
9a, b).
Figure 8: Test specimen after test
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 12 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
a)
b)
Figure 9a), b): load introduction after test
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 13 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
7. Summary
The company RABDION LTD. commissioned the Institute of Concrete Structures and Structural
Engineering of the Technical University Kaiserslautern to carry out tensile tests on bars of Glass Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (GFRP). The bars are stressed in a tensile testing machine under centric strain
up to failure. The young modulus, tensile stress and elongation of the GFRP bars are determined from
the recorded data.
The rupture occurred for all bars within the free length.
Table 3: Mean values of the results from the tensile test
1 Measured with slide gauge (see chapter 4) 2 linear extrapolated value with calculated young-modulus
Mean value
Core diameter 1 Number of
tests
Maximum
force
Tensile
strength
Young
Modulus
Elongation
at Fracture 2
[mm] [Piece] [kN] [MPa] [MPa] [%]
30,91 3 620,5 826,6 52406,8 1,59
Project 17059MLK/14511 from 20.11.2017 Page 14 of 14 Tensile tests on GFRP ø 32 mm according to ISO 10406
8. Bibliography
[1] ISO 10406-1: Fibre-reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcment of concrete – Test methods, 2008 [2] ASTM D 7205/D 7205M-06: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced
Polymer Matrix Composite Bars, 2010