city of winter park planning and zoning board staff … · 2020-06-12 · city of winter park...
TRANSCRIPT
CITY OF WINTER PARK PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Staff Report
March 5, 2019
SPR 19-03 REQUEST OF PHIL KEAN DESIGN GROUP FOR APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW, TWO-STORY, 9,455 SQUARE FOOT, SINGLE-FAMILY HOME LOCATED AT 181 VIRGINIA DRIVE ON LAKE VIRGINIA, ZONED R-1AAA.
Phil Kean Design Group is requesting site plan approval to construct a new, two-story, 9,455 square-foot, single-family home at 181 Virginia Drive, which is located on Lake Virginia, and is zoned R-1AAA. This property came before the Board on October of last year, and received an approval for an addition to the existing home. Since that time, the owners have decided to demolish the existing home, and construct a new home which is the reason for this subsequent public hearing. The buildable area of this property measures approximately 29,841 square feet. The proposed two-story home will be total of 9,455 square feet, which yields a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 32%. This new home will have impervious lot coverage of 10,735 square feet or 36%. Both the FAR and impervious coverages are within the maximum the code permits, which are 38% and 50%, respectively. TREE PRESERVATION: The Code direction on water front lots is “to preserve existing trees to the degree reasonably possible.” The applicant has met onsite with the city’s Urban Forestry Department to discuss the large 80” oak tree in the northeast portion of the site. The applicant is preserving this tree, and is proposing a wood deck around this oak tree that has been designed to not interfere with its root system. VIEW FROM THE LAKE: The Code direction is to minimize the height and extent of stem walls or retaining walls facing the lake. Generally, the policy is not to permit walls/swimming pool decks facing the lake in excess of three feet in height. This lot does have some grade drop, but the house and rear deck have been designed as to not exceed the three foot height rule. VIEW OF NEIGHBORS: The Code direction is to minimize the degradation of traditional views across properties by new houses, additions, second story additions, etc. alongside property lines toward the lake that may block traditional views. This home will be constructed behind the 50 foot lakefront setback and the average setback of the two adjacent homes as to not block their lake views. STORM WATER RETENTION: The zoning code requires retention of storm water so that storm water flowing over a waterfront lawn area does not carry with it into the lake any fertilizers, herbicides, etc. Typically, this retention requirement is accomplished by the creation of a depressed swale area across the waterfront of about one foot in depth. The amount of impervious surface determines the need for the depth of the swale. The applicant is proposing a storm water swale near the lake that is sized to meet the code requirements.
SUMMARY: Overall, the plans meet the intent of the lakefront review criteria. Staff does not see any significant concerns with the proposed home as presented. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 9/19/2018 14:2 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 9/19/2018 14:2 Aerial 2018 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
D
r
i
v
e
C L
(
5
0
'
P
l
a
t
t
e
d
R
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
W
a
y
)
"BB"
(
B
r
i
c
k
R
o
a
d
)
N 00°00'00" E 184.40'(P)-to Witness Corner
N 00°02'58" W 188.72'(M)-to Witness Corner
N
6
4
°
4
1
'0
0
"
W
7
7
.
0
0
'(
P
)
N
6
4
°
4
1
'0
0
"
W
7
7
.
0
0
'(
M
)
Fnd.
1
2
" R
ebar
"N
o Identification"
4' Chain Link Fence
Lo
t 5
Blo
ck A
1
9
.
7
'
2
0
.
2
'
6
.
7
'
1
.
2
'
2
4
.
2
'
1
7
.
8
'
3
4
.
7
'
0.9'
2
1
.
5
'
2
0
.
2
'
X
N 00°00'00" E 342.91'(C)-Overall
2
4
.
3
'
S
5
9
°
1
8
'
0
3
"
E
8
0
.
9
5
'
(
C
)
P
l
a
t
t
e
d
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
L
i
n
e
S
6
2
°
2
3
'
3
6
"
E
1
5
8
.
4
3
'
(
M
)
S
u
r
v
e
y
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
L
i
n
e
6
.
7
'
Calculated C
orner
Corner N
OT
Located
Platted W
itness C
orner
NW
C
orner of Lot 4, B
lock A
NE
C
orner of Lot 5, B
lock A
Fnd. 1" Iron P
ipe
"N
o Identification"
Witness C
orner
5
'
I
r
o
n
F
e
n
c
e
5' Iron Fence
5' Iron Fence
5
.
5
'
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
W
a
l
k
/
S
e
a
w
a
l
l
W
o
o
d
D
o
c
k
147.1
4' Chain Link Fence
3.6'
N 00°00'00" E 178.50'(P)-to Witness Corner
N 00°00'00" E 177.37'(M)-to Witness Corner
Calculated C
orner
Corner N
OT
Located
Platted W
itness C
orner
NW
C
orner of Lot 5, B
lock A
N 00°00'00" E 404.97'(C)-Overall
1.2'
Fnd.
1
2
" R
ebar
"N
o Identification"
Witness C
orner
4
.
4
'
S
6
9
°
2
0
'1
6
"
E
7
5
.
4
8
'(
C
)
P
la
t
t
e
d
C
lo
s
u
r
e
L
in
e
Calculated C
orner
Corner N
OT
Located
Platted W
itness C
orner
NE
C
orner of Lot 4, B
lock A
E
d
g
e
o
f
W
a
t
e
r
Lo
t 4
Blo
ck A
2.7'
2.2'
X
Fnd.
1
2
" Iron P
ipe &
C
ap
"H
TC
A 2864"
2.96' N
orth, 4.48' W
est
1
7
.
8
'
C
o
v
e
r
e
d
B
o
a
t
H
o
u
s
e
C
o
v
e
r
e
d
B
o
a
t
S
lip
258.0
1
.
0
'
S
e
a
w
a
l
l
N
6
7
°
3
5
'0
0
"
W
7
6
.
4
0
'(
P
)
N
7
0
°
0
0
'0
0
"
W
7
2
.
1
0
'(
P
)
N
6
9
°
4
3
'2
8
"
W
7
1
.
6
5
'(
M
)
X
0.1'
X
X
4
.
7
'
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
u
r
b
I
n
l
e
t
E
d
g
e
o
f
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
E
d
g
e
o
f
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
0
.
5
'
C
u
r
b
67°35'(P)
"BB"
Fnd. X
C
ut
2.9
'
0.3
'
N
6
7
°
3
5
'0
0
"
W
7
6
.
4
0
'(
M
)
N 00°00'00" E 176.00'(P)-to Witness Corner
Approxim
ate Location of
100yr F
lood Line S
caled
from
F
.I.R
.M
.
Are
a =
5
2,5
87
± sq
ft
= 1
.2
1± a
cre
s
"U
pla
nd
" A
re
a =
2
9,8
41
± sq
ft
= 0
.6
9± a
cre
s
0
.
5
'
C
u
r
b
1
0
0
Y
e
a
r
F
lo
o
d
P
la
n
e
(
P
e
r
C
o
n
t
o
u
r
)
E
le
v
a
t
io
n
=
6
7
.
3
'
N
A
V
D
8
8
C
L
#2
8
0
"
O
a
k
1
2
"
P
a
l
m
1
0
"
P
a
l
m
1
4
"
O
a
k
5'± Hedges
5'± Hedges
1
0
"
P
a
l
m
Norm
al H
igh W
ater E
levation
Elevation =
64.5'
Falls in W
ater
Current W
ater E
levation
Elevation =
65.06'
03/09/18
#1
W
o
o
d
S
t
a
ir
s
8
0
"
O
a
k
1
4
"
P
a
l
m
25'-0" SIDE SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)
18'-0" SIDE SETBACK (1ST FLOOR)
18'-0" SIDE SETBACK (1ST FLOOR)
25'-0" SIDE SETBACK (2ND FLOOR)
5'-0" SIDE SETBACK (DETACHED GARAGE)
RE
F
D W
3
5
'-
6
5
8
"
25'-0"24'-0"5'-0"
23'-4"
5'-0"
25'-0"28'-6"
13'-8"
4'-8"
8'-3"
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
TO THE FENCE WHICH SHALL FACE TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE TREE PROTECTION AREA.EACH TREE PROTECTION AREA SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO SIGNS ATTACHED
2.5'POSTS - 2 X 4 ; 4' ABOVE GROUNDOR TEMPORARY ORANGE FENCING
NOTE: FENCING SHALL BE AT LEAST 4' ABOVE GROUND AND MIN. OF 3' BELOW GRADE.
PROHIBITED WITHIN FENCED AREAS.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
ALL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ARE
2" X 4"
FENCING SHALL BE SET IN PLACE
MEDIUM/LARGE TREES:MINIMUM SET BACK
MINIMUM SET BACK SMALL TREE:
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
10' FROM TRUNK
1' DIAMETER FOR EVERY1" OF TREE CALIPER
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN WORKING AROUND SAVED TREES.
2. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE DONE BY HAND
WITHIN TREE ROOT IMPACT ZONE.
3. ALL EARTHWORK WITHIN A TEN (10) FOOT RADIUS
ZONE AROUND SAVED TREES SHALL
N.T.S.
OR OTHER SIMILAR BARRIER THAT WILLLIMIT ACCESS TO THE PROTECTED AREA
DO NOT STORE MATERIALS IN THIS AREA.
EXISTING TREE TO BEPRESERVED
POSTS MIN. (8) FEET APART
BE NON-COMPACTED.
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
AS0.1
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
N.T.S.
CONCEPTUAL SUMMER KITCHEN
N.T.S.
3D CONCEPTUAL REAR ELEVATION
N.T.S.
3D CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
D
r
i
v
e
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
6
5
.
9
9
6
6
.
2
3
6
6
.
4
4
7
3
.
1
9
6
6
.
4
8
6
6
.
2
0
6
6
.
3
3
6
7
.
3
3
6
7
.
3
4
6
7
.
3
1
6
7
.
2
6
7
1
.
5
6
9
.
5
6
9
.
9
7
3
.
5
7
6
.
3
7
7
6
.
4
8
7
7
.
8
7
6
.
9
7
8
.
9
7
9
.
4
78.1
4
7
6
.
7
7
7
6
.
8
2
7
6
.
8
2
7
2
.
8
7
4
.
9
2
7
5
.
0
7
8
.
5
7
8
.
9
4
7
9
.
5
1
7
9
.
8
2
7
9
.
8
6
7
9
.
9
4
8
0
.
0
6
8
0
.
6
3
8
0
.
9
6
8
0
.
5
2
8
0
.
9
8
0
.
8
6
8
0
.
5
9
8
0
.
6
8
0
.
3
7
8
.
0
2
7
8
.
0
2
7
6
.
9
0
7
6
.
7
7
9
.
5
7
9
.
3
7
8
.
7
1
7
5
.
7
7
9
.
0
7
8
.
7
7
9
.
3
7
9
.
4
6
7
9
.
5
4
7
9
.
7
2
7
9
.
8
8
7
9
.
2
0
77.8
5
7
7
.
9
7
6
.
8
4
7
6
.2
6
9
.
2
7
6
.
7
9
7
8
.
5
9
7
8
.
5
5
7
8
.
8
0
8
0
.
2
321
78.410
TRV
7
6
.
6
8
7
6
.
6
8
7
6
.
5
8
7
7
.
3
7
5
.
3
7
2
.
3
7
2
.
2
7
5
.
2
7
6
.
4
4
7
6
.
5
2
7
6
.
7
3
7
2
.
7
0
7
2
.
4
8
7
2
.
4
8
7
6
.
5
3
7
6
.
5
0
7
6
.
5
6
7
1
.
6
7
1
.
8
7
2
.
5
7
1
.
7
7
6
.
4
5
7
5
.
0
30" Mag
80" Camphor Tree
Virginia Drive
100 Year Flood Line
Elevation 67.3' - NAVD 88
Survey Closure LinePlatted Closure Line
Normal High Water Elevation
Elevation = 64.5'
Falls in Water
Edge of Water
1.0' Seawall
Wood Dock
CoveredBoat House
CoveredBoat Slip
Wood S
tairs
5.5' Concrete Walk/Seawall
Approximate Location of 100yr
Flood Line Scaled from F.I.R.M.
Curb Inlet
4.7' Concrete Walk
Edge of Pavement
0.5' Curb
Edge of Pavement
0.5' Curb
Residence
FFE 77.50
80" Oak
14" Oak
12" Palm
10" Palm
50' Lake Front Setback
Lake Virginia
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 18
'
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 7
.5'
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 18
'
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 18
'
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 18
'
Existing Drive
EQ
C
Current Water ElevationElevation = 65.06'
03/09/18
Existing Electrical & Cable
Utilities Per Site Photos
Sid
e S
etb
ack - 5
'
73.0 TW71.5 BW
74.0 FG
74.58 FG
75.5 FG
77.0 FG
(3) 6" Risers
(3) 6" Risers
(5) 7" Risers
(3) 6" Risers
76.0 FG
77.5 FG
77.4 FG
75.9 FG
76.0 PC
73.0 FG
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Garage
FFE - 77.0 - 77.17
(1) 6" Riser
(1) 6" Riser
77.17 FG
77.0 FG
77.17FG
77.0 FG
74.5 PC
74.5 FG
74.5 TW
℄
℄
80.9 FG
71
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
(3) 6" Risers
Pool
Catch Basin
(3) 6" Risers
Wood Deck
Limit of Trunk
Sunshelf
Seat
Weir
Weir
Plinth
77.0
77.0
78.5
80.0
80.9
MotorCourt
Parking
Drive
72
Spa
(1) 6" Riser
77.0 FG
80.0 TW
80.5 TC
80.0 TW
78.5 FG
72.5 FG
G-501
L-201
77.0 FG 77.0 FG
(3) 6" Risers
L-301
L-302
L-302
P-101
P-101
P-102
77.5 FG 77.5 FG
77.5 FG
76.0 PC
(1) 6" Riser
P-103
P-302
P-302
P-401
P-402
P-403
S-401
P-303
P-201
P-202
(1) 6" Riser
77.4 FG
(3) 6" Risers
PLT
PLT
PLT(2) 6" Risers
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
PLT
G-501
73.0 FG
71.5 FG
74.5 FG
Wood Deck
Water
Feature
72.5 FG
72.83 FG
Wood Deck
(3) 7" Risers
S-A
Garage
FFE - 77.0 - 77.17
76.34 FG
73.5 FG
S-101
S-101
REF
DW
2801.54 sq.ft.
Fern
andez R
esid
ence
Winte
r P
ark
, Flo
rida
181 V
irginia
Dr
DA
TE
: D
ate
Seal:
DE
SIG
NE
R:
CO
RE
Y J
. M
ILLS
RLA
# 6
66
68
31
DR
AW
N B
Y:
Scale
:
Pro
ject
Nam
e:
Consultants:
Sheet
No.
Sheet
Title
:
M:\P
ro
je
ct F
ile
s\P
K-F
ER
NA
ND
EZ
-W
P-R
\D
ra
win
gs\L
1.1
1 H
ard
sca
pe
P
la
n.d
wg
,2
01
9-0
2-1
1, ----
Rev:
Date
:D
escription:
By:
Pro
ject
#:
1" =
10
'-0
"
Har
dsca
pe &
Gra
ding
Pla
n
L1.11
AE
, C
SC
M, A
E
20
18-0
8-1
3
20
18.0
50
0
SCALE:
feet10 20 30
1" = 10'
Abbreviations:
BS Bottom of Stairs
BW Bottowm of Wall
CB Catch Basin℄ Center Line
DI Drain Inlet
FFE Finish Floor ElevationFG Finish Grade
E Existing
HP High PointLP Low Point
NHWL Normal High Water LinePC Pool Coping
PLT Planting
SC Spa Coping
TBR To Be Removed
TS Top of Stairs
TW Top of Wall
82 Proposed Contour
Existing Contour
Proposed Spot Elevation
Direction of Slope
Existing Spot Elevation
Normal High Water Line
Building Set Back(s)
Utility Easements
Property Line
Flood Line
Symbols Legend
GRADING LEGEND
95.00
Lot 4 & 5 = Type "C" Drainage Lot
Impervious CalculationsSQ. F.T. %
Overall Lot Area 52,586.0 100.0%
First Floor 4,858.3
Garage 560.0
Summer Kitchen/Bath 416.5
Driveway, Motor Court 1,851.9
Pool & Pool Deck 2,567.3
Front Water Feature 294.1
Front Walk 186.4
Total Impervious 10,734.5 20.4%
Total Pervious 41,851.6 79.6%
Swale Calculations Area Cu. Ft.Total Impervious Area 10,734.5
(Impervious sq. ft. x 0.083 (1st 1" of Impervious Area) = Required Cu. Ft. 0.0830
Required Swale Cubic Feet 891.0
S-A @ 4" Deep2,801.5 924.5
Total 2,801.5 924.5Note: The Swales are not square so Lenghts and Widths are base off of
averages.
MAGNOLIA 1
To Be Remvoed
-
OAK 1
To Be Remvoed
-
PALMS 2
To Be Remvoed
-
Tree To Be Removed
Existing GradeFinish Grade
Bottom of Swale
TYPICAL SWALE
NTSScale:
Varies See Plan
Side Slope
1:3 Max
1
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO BE COORDINATED WITH
CONTRACTOR & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. COPY OF APPROVED
PERMIT TO BE PROVIDED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
ROOT INSPECTION & ROOT PRUNING TO BE COORDINATED WITH
DRU DENNISON, WITH CITY OF WINTER PARK, PRIOR TO
DEMOLITION & CONSTUCTION
AE
Poo
l Lay
ot R
ivew
20
19.2
.30
Drain Fields
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Trench Drain
FENCES, GATES & RAILING
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Railing
COLUMNS
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Column, Finish to Match House - 24"x24"x42"
WALLS
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Landscape Walls - Backyard - Max Height 3`
Landscape Walls - Front Yard
POOL AREA
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Pool Deck
Pool Coping
Wood Deck
MOTOR COURT & DRIVEWAY
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Driveway & Motor Court Pavers
12" Concrete Band
PATIOS & WALKWAYS
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Patio Pavers
Artificial Turf
STEPPING STONES
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
30" x 72" Stepping Stones
36" x 88" Stepping Stone
36" x 60" Stepping Stone in Pool
PLANTING POTS
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
24" Width and 24" Height - Lengh Vaires | Color TBD
Planter Bowl on Plith W/ Gravel Base
FOUNTAIN
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Water Feature
G-501
L-101
L-201
L-301
L-302
P-101
P-102
P-103
P-201
P-202
P-302
P-303
P-401
P-402
P-403
S-101
S-102
S-401
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
Total DBH TBH 44"
L-101
S-102
AE
Lake
Fro
nt R
evie
w S
ubm
ittal
20
19.2
.111
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
FAMILY ROOM
2 CAR GARAGE
1 CAR GARAGE
KIDS STUDIO
MUD ROOM
PANTRY
DINING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
FOYER
LIBRARY
MASTER CLOSET
MASTER BEDROOM
MASTER BATH
OUTDOOR LIVING
LANAI
LUNCH
KITCHEN
STAIRS
GALLERY
GALLERY
SITTING
ENTRY
COURTYARD
COURTYARD
BAR
WINE
SUMMER KITCHEN
W.C.
STOR.
PWDR.
LAUNDRY/
ELEV.
W.I.C.
W.C.
REF
DW
STORAGE
A2.0
LOWER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
DIMENSIONS
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
LOFT
GAME ROOM
EXERCISE ROOM
JUNIOR SUITE
BATH 4
BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
OPEN TO BELOW
STEAM
W.I.C.
W.I.C.
W.I.C.
BATH 1
BATH 2
BATH 3
BALCONY
BEVERAGES
LINEN
PWDR.
BALCONY
BALCONY
LINEN
W.I.C.
ELEV.
LAUNDRY
W/D
A3.0
UPPER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
DIMENSIONS
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
ATTIC
14'-8" x 30'-0"
MECH./STORAGE
ME
CH
.
ME
CH
.
ME
CH
.
ELEV.
ME
CH
./S
TO
RA
GE
MAIN LEVEL
A/C:
2 CAR DETACHED GARAGE
1 CAR GARAGE
LANAI
UPPER LEVEL
A/C:
TOTALS
A/C:
GARAGES:
LANAI AND SUMMER KITCHEN:
TOTAL UNDER ROOF:
AREA CALCS: PROPOSED
4432 S.F.
560 S.F.
343 S.F.
737 S.F.
3072 S.F.
8090 S.F.
903 S.F.
1060 S.F.
9855 S.F.
REAR BALCONIES: 1048 S.F.
OPEN TO BELOW: 388 S.F.
OPEN TO BELOW: 388 S.F.
FRONT BALCONIES: 55 S.F.
ATTIC LEVEL
A/C: 586 S.F.
ATTIC SPACE 586 S.F.
SUMMER KITCHEN 323 S.F.
A3.1
UPPER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FRONT ELEVATION
40
'-8
"
12 :12 PITCH
10
'-6
"
DESCRIPTION
1. STUCCO FINISH
2. TILE ROOF, OVER APPROVED WATER BARRIER,
OVER ROOF SHEATHING.
3. WOOD CORBEL TO MATCH EXISTING CORBELS
4. 4" RAISED STUCCO BAND
5. 8" RAISED STUCCO BAND
6. 6" RAISED STUCCO BAND
ELEVATION NOTES:
#
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
REAR ELEVATION
40
'-8
"
12 :12 PITCH
10
'-6
"
A4.0
FRONT & REAR
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
LEFT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
10
'-6
"
DESCRIPTION
1. STUCCO FINISH
2. TILE ROOF, OVER APPROVED WATER BARRIER,
OVER ROOF SHEATHING.
3. WOOD CORBEL TO MATCH EXISTING CORBELS
4. 4" RAISED STUCCO BAND
5. 8" RAISED STUCCO BAND
6. 6" RAISED STUCCO BAND
ELEVATION NOTES:
#
A4.1
LEFT AND RIGHT
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER
DRAWN BY:
TH
ES
E D
OC
UM
EN
TS
A
ND
T
HE
IR
C
ON
TE
NT
S A
RE
T
HE
P
RO
PE
RT
Y O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
A
ND
A
RE
IS
SU
ED
O
NL
Y F
OR
T
HE
S
PE
CIF
IC
P
RO
JE
CT
N
OT
ED
O
N T
HE
SE
D
RA
WIN
GS
. A
NY
R
EP
RO
DU
CT
IO
N A
ND
/O
R R
ED
IS
TR
IB
UT
IO
N W
IT
HO
UT
T
HE
E
XP
RE
SS
ED
W
RIT
TE
N C
ON
SE
NT
O
F P
HIL
K
EA
N D
ES
IG
N G
RO
UP
IS
P
RO
HIB
IT
ED
B
Y L
AW
. T
O T
HE
B
ES
T O
F T
HE
A
RC
HIT
EC
T'S
K
NO
WL
ED
GE
, T
HE
SE
P
LA
NS
A
ND
S
PE
CIF
IC
AT
IO
NS
C
OM
PL
Y W
IT
H T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
M
IN
IM
UM
B
UIL
DIN
G C
OD
ES
A
ND
T
HE
A
PP
LIC
AB
LE
F
IR
E S
AF
ET
Y S
TA
ND
AR
DS
.
SHEET
DESCRIPTION:
DATA:
DESIGNER:
PROJECT:
ISSUE DATE: _________________
ARCHITECT:
PLAN REVISIONS
# DATE DESCRIPT.
NAME
NAME
CECIL JEFFERSON DAVIS
AR # 98196
912 W. Fairbanks Avenue
Winter Park, Florida 32789
PH 407-599-3922
FAX 407-599-3923
WWW.PHILKEANDESIGNS.COM
ARCHITECTURE
CONSTRUCTION
I N T E R I O R S
FE
RN
AN
DE
Z R
ES
ID
EN
CE
181 V
irginia D
rive
Winter P
ark, F
L 32789
CITY OF WINTER PARK
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Staff Report
March 5, 2019
REQUEST OF Z PROPERTIES GROUP, INC. FOR: SUBDIVISION OR LOT SPLIT
APPROVAL TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY AT 1756 HOLLYWOOD AVENUE, ZONED R-
1A, INTO TWO SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING LOTS. VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED FOR
DIMENSIONS LESS THAN THE 75 FEET OF LOT WIDTH AND 8,500 SQUARE FEET OF
LOT AREA REQUIRED IN THE R-1A ZONING.
Z Properties Group, Inc. (contract purchaser) is requesting subdivision or lot split
approval to divide 1756 Hollywood Avenue into two single-family lots. The zoning of this property is R-1A. The western lot is proposed to be 50 feet wide and 7,250 square
feet in size, and the eastern lot is proposed to be 60 feet wide and 8,700 square feet in size. Both lots will need a variance from the 75 feet of lot width required for an R-1A lot, and only the western lot will need a variance from the 8,500 square feet of
lot area required for an R-1A lot. The eastern portion of the property is currently developed with one single-family home that will be preserved as part of this request.
During the City’s review process of subdivisions or lot split requests, there are two criteria that are reviewed. First is the ‘Zoning Test’ as to conformance with the zoning
criteria. The next is the ‘Comprehensive Plan Test’ which is conformance to the neighborhood character.
ZONING TEST: This existing property is 110 feet wide on Hollywood Avenue, and measures approximately 15,950 square feet in size. The western lot is proposed to
be 50 feet wide and 7,250 square feet in size, and the eastern lot is proposed to be 60 feet wide and 8,700 square feet in size. Both lots will need a variance from the 75
feet of lot with required for an R-1A lot, and only the western lot will need a variance from the 8,500 square feet of lot area required for an R-1A lot.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEST: There are many neighborhoods in the City that are zoned R-1AA or R-1A, but the existing character may be significantly different than
the zoning code minimums. As a result, the practice outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Code (attached) is to look at the surrounding neighborhood
to compare the standard lot sizes. The Code dictates that the review area is within a 500-foot radius of the subject property, and limited to those in the same zoning.
There are 82 homes within this neighborhood with the same R-1A zoning (see attached map). The average lot width is 75.5 feet, and the median lot width is 75
feet. The average lot area from this 82 home survey is 10,437 square feet, and the median lot area is 10,563 square feet.
It appears from this comparison that the requested lot dimensions fall short of the existing neighborhood. The proposed lot widths of 50/60 feet only compare favorable
to 22% of the neighborhood, and the proposed lot areas of 7,250/8,700 square feet only compare favorable to 32% of the neighborhood.
Oftentimes, the Comprehensive Plan test includes a larger area that doesn’t necessarily represent the neighborhood. Because of this, staff also looked at the 15
homes directly on Hollywood Avenue between North Phelps Avenue and North Lakemont Avenue (see attached maps). When looking at the direct homes abutting
this request, which are the most impacted, this request compares favorably. Of these 15 homes, nine of them or 60% currently have lot widths that are 50 to 60 feet wide as the applicant is requesting. Furthermore, of these 15 homes, 12 of them or 80%,
are currently developed with a home that is less than 2,500 square feet, as the applicant is proposing.
APPLICABLE CODES: The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and Subdivision Code section governing lot splits are on the following page.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS: The applicant recognizes that the requested lot sizes are
reduced in lot width and lot sizes from the R-1A and Comprehensive Plan comparisons. As a result, the compromise offered by the applicant is the commitment to preserving the existing house in the eastern portion of the lot. The commitment is
to remodel the interior and exterior of this 1922 cottage bungalow to bring it back to its historic appearance and to place the home on the City’s “Register of Historic
Places” so that the home is preserved and cannot be demolished. The garage and shed in the rear of the lot will be moved to the eastern portion of the lot, so that the
entire 50 feet to the west of the existing home will be clear for construction of new home on the split portion of the lot. The new garage will be constructed in the same character as the existing home.
Thus with the support of the City’s Architect, who is the staff liaison to the city’s
Historic Preservation Board, the applicant commits to designating this historic 1922 home on the Winter Park Historic Register. If this lot split is approved, the applicant will bring the home to the Historic Preservation Board for designation. The applicant
has provided a front elevation for the restored existing home on the eastern lot at 1756 Hollywood that adds a front porch element consistent with the existing cottage
bungalow architectural style. Staff has included a map (see attached) that shows that this area of the city is underrepresented with individually designated properties on the Winter Park Register of Historic Places.
The second commitment by the applicant is to build the new home on the western
50 foot lot in a style and image of cottage bungalow architecture. The third commitment from the applicant is to limit the size of both homes to a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 33% so that both the scale and style are compatible with the existing homes
along Hollywood Avenue. The existing home is now 2,000 square feet and the FAR of 33% would allow up to 2,887 square feet. The new home plans contemplate 2,100
square feet and the 33% FAR would allow up to 2,392 square feet. This is a significant concession, as it reduces the allowable square footage that can be built on the lot by 724-870 square feet. Staff has the ability to ensure that these conditions are met at
the building permit phase, by not issuing the permit for construction or a Certificate of Occupancy if the building plans to not reflect these concessions.
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: This lot measures 15,950 square feet in size. Therefore, if a buyer were to demolish the existing home, under the existing
38% FAR, they could build a home by-right of 6,061 square feet in size. This is out of scale and character of the neighborhood. As previously mentioned, staff analyzed
the current square footages of the homes directly on Hollywood Avenue, and determined that 80% of the street is developed with homes of less than 2,500 square
feet. Only three homes directly on Hollywood Avenue are over 2,500 square feet in size.
SUMMARY: The custom of the planning staff is not to recommend “approval” of lot
splits with variances. However, planning staff notes that while this request requires variances and does not pass the Comprehensive Plan test per Policy 1-3.6.8, the City does encourage the preservation designation of local historic resources per Policy 1-
6.4.2 (referenced below). The applicant is making three significant concessions or commitments. One is to preserve, restore and historically designate the existing
home, the second is build the new home in a similar bungalow architectural style, per the plans presented and the third is to limit the FAR. These are compelling reasons to offer support for the variances versus another tear down and modern
6,000 square foot new home that could be built, which as mentioned and depicted on the attached maps, is out of character for the neighborhood.
Staff Recommendation is for APPROVAL, with the following conditions as mitigation for the lot split variances:
1. That the applicant commit to a historical designation of the existing home at 1756 Hollywood Avenue (eastern lot).
2. That the new home on the split lot be of cottage bungalow style, as presented.
3. That the maximum floor area ratio for both lots shall be 33%.
RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES:
Policy 1-3.6.8: Subdivision of Land and Lot Splits for Non-Lakefront Single
Family and Low Density Multi-Family Property. The City shall consider approving subdivision and lot split applications, which are not lakefront properties and which are not estate lots in areas designated single family, low density or multi-family
residential, when the proposed new lots are designed at size and density consistent with the existing conditions in the surrounding neighborhood within a radius of five
hundred (500) feet. Policy 1-6.4.2: Encourage Designation of Local Historic Resources &
Establishment of Historic Districts. The City shall encourage the designation of local historic resources, and the establishment of historic districts that protect historic
resources and their settings through the Land Development Code regulations.
ARTICLE VI. - SUBDIVISION AND LOT CONSOLIDATION REGULATIONS
Sec. 58-377. - Conformance to the comprehensive plan.
(a) In the City of Winter Park, as a substantially developed community, the review of lot splits, lot consolidations, plats, replats or subdivisions within developed areas of the city shall insure conformance with the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan
as a precedent to the conformance with other technical standards or code requirements.
(b) In existing developed areas and neighborhoods, all proposed lots shall conform to the existing area of neighborhood density and layout. The proposed lot sizes,
widths, depths, shape, access arrangement, buildable areas and orientation shall conform to the neighborhood standards and existing conditions. This provision is
specifically intended to allow the denial or revision by the city of proposed lot splits, lot consolidations, plats, replats or subdivisions when those are not in conformance with the existing neighborhood density or standards, even if the proposed lots meet
the minimum technical requirements of the zoning regulations.
(c) In determining the existing area or neighborhood density and standards, for the consideration of lot splits, plats, replats or subdivision of other than estate lots or lakefront lots, the planning and zoning commission and city commission shall
consider the frontage and square foot area of home sites and vacant properties with comparable zoning within an area of 500-foot radius from the proposed subdivision.
(d) In order to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan, the city commission may also impose restrictions on the size, scale, and style of proposed building,
structures, or other improvements. This provision shall enable the city commission to impose restrictions on the size, height, setback, lot coverage, impervious area or
right-of-way access such that proposed building and other improvements match the dimension and character of the surrounding area or neighborhood.
55
55
2
38
22
50
81504545
45
40 4550
50
10
20 20
81
5050
252525
25
5050
50
50
50
50 50 50
5050
50
2525
2550
2525
505050
5050
25
50 5050
30
40 20
20
12
50
50
4545
72
72
72
73
65
7065
85 85
10
73
50
50
50
502525
502525 75
50
50
50
255050
1250
2575
2575
505050
40
25254550
70 7065
85 85
85
85
70 70
707073
5050
25
25
2525
25 50
5050
2550
4550
5050
3025
2525
10
10
50
38
50
50 48 2250
5050
50
50
70
70
70 73
50
73
50 50
50 50
25
50
75
50
50
2525
50
50
50
5045
40
72
72
75
70
12
50
50
25
4850
50 5050
50 50 50 50 50
40
30
30
40
45 2540
50
50121
1.4
150150
150
150
150
123 123 13
3
150
125
145
105
105
140
125
125
125
125 125
150
150150
150
150
150150
150
150
150
105
105
140
145
133
125
140
150
150
105
137
145
49.4
92.5
92.5
77.777.7
68.8
53.5
53.5
84.4
27.5 22.5
77.7
22.527.5
77.7 77.7
84.4
49.2
72.03
72.03
71.94
52.25
87.27
53.59
153.5
153.5
153.5
153.5
86.26
137.9
70.35
71.94
49.26 49.26
74.95
52.25
74.95
133.8
71.94
71.94
153.5153.5
87.27
87.27
153.5
121.7
85.36
138.8
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
312
4.63
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
3
103.7
9
203.07
134.2
1
133.9
1
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
3
124.6
3
134.1
1
124.6
3
124.6
3
104.5
8
124.6
3
124.6
3
134.0
1
MIZEL L AVES
PHEL
PS AV
E
SLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
RO UN DE L AY L N
N PH
ELPS
AVE
NLA
KEMO
NTAV
EHARR
ISAV
E
HOLTS GROVE CIR
BU RK S CI R
WARD
DR HO LLYWO OD AVE
GRE E NWICH AV E
CA RO L L E E LN
COMPREHENSIVEPLAN TEST
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
1756 Hollywood Ave
Average Lot Width = 75.5 ftMedian Lot Width = 75 ft
Average Lot Size = 10,437 sq ftMedian Lot Size = 10,563 sq ft
NOTES
Single-Family Lots Within 500' of Site(82 total)
LEGENDSubject Site
MIZEL L AVE
NLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
HARR
ISAV
E
N PH
ELPS
AVE
BU RK S CI R
S PH
ELPS
AVE
SLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
HO LLYWO OD AVE
GRE E NWICH AV E
HOLLYWOOD AVEANALYSIS
®
City o f Winter ParkFlorida
Smiley Mini Park
LEGEND1756 Ho lly wo o d AveLot Width 50'-60'Lot Width ≥ 75'Non-residential Properties
MIZEL L AVE
NLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
HARR
ISAV
E
N PH
ELPS
AVE
BU RK S CI R
S PH
ELPS
AVE
SLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
HO LLYWO OD AVE
GRE E NWICH AV E
HOLLYWOOD AVEANALYSIS
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
Smiley Mini Park
LEGEND1756 Hollywood AveHome Size ≥ 2,500 sq ftHome Size ≤ 2,500 sq ftNon-residential Properties
)
LakeSylvan
ALOM A AVE
MIZE LL AVE
SPHE
LPS
AVE
LOC H BER RY R D
GLE NWO O D DR
SYLV
AN D
R
N PH
ELPS
AVE
HARRIS CIR
MORA
Y LN
N PERTH LN
GR OV E T ER
S LAK
EMON
T AVE
LOCH
LOMO
ND D
R
BUR KS C IR
DU ND EE DR
NLA
KEMO
NTAV
E
WARD
DR
HARR
IS AV
E
HALL
AVE
NED I NB URG H
D R
BALM
ORAL RD
GO ODR ICH AVE
RO UNDE L AY LN
LAND
ERRD
GENIUS DR
SHEP
HERD
AVE
FLET
CHER
PL
HOLLYWOO D AVE
ANZLE AVE
GRE ENWI CH AV E
S EDI
NBUR
GH D
R
BENM
ORE
DR
CAR O LLEE LN
GR IN NE LL TE R
HO LTS GRO VE C IR
HOLLYWOOD AVEANALYSIS
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
LEGEND
) Individually DesignatedHome on WP Register of Historic Places
1756 Hollywood Ave
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 2/11/2019 9:59 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 2/11/2019 9:59 Aerial 2018 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Not Included in this Legal D
escription
The R
em
aining P
ortion of Lot 6
N90° 00' 00"E(C)
126.66'(M)
N90° 00' 00"E(M) 50.00'(M) N90° 00' 00"E(M) 59.25'(M)
N00° 02' 11"W
(M
)143.34'(M
)
S89° 34' 38"E(M)
50.00'(M)
S00° 02' 09"E
143.71'(M
)
N89° 34' 38"W(M)
59.85'(M)
S00° 16' 07"E
(C
)
144.16'(M
)
N90° 00' 00"E(C)
721.51'(C)
S0
0° 02
' 00"W
(M
)
290.31'(P
)
N89° 59' 20"E(M)
149.40'(C)175.82'(C)
S89° 52' 05"E(M)N89° 39' 48"E(M)
398.69'(C)
W 1/2 of
Lot 6
Lot 5
Lot 4
Lot 7
Lot 34
Lot 35
Lot 36Lot 37Lot 38
Lot 3
Lot 2
Lot 1
PI of Lots 9 &
10
PI of Lots 12 &
13
Plat C
orner
Plat C
orner
Plat C
orner
Northw
est C
orner
of Lot 1
N00° 02' 11"W
143.71'(M
)
40.00'(P)
West Line of Lot 4
East Line of the W
est 1/2 of Lot 6
(Asphalt Road)
(50' Right-of-Way)
Hollywood Avenue
C
C
L
L
Point of
Com
mencem
ent
(P
roposed P
arcel B
)
Point of
Begining
45.00'(P) 24.85'(C)
Pro
po
se
d P
arce
l A
Are
a: 7
,1
76
.2
6 S
q F
t
Pro
po
se
d P
arce
l B
Are
a: 8
,5
70
.1
9 S
q F
t
Parent Tract Survey
File Number: IS-56079
Legal Description:
-Legend-
_ _
P.B.
ORB
N.R.
N&D
FFE
Conc.
Esmt.
CM
Fnd.
_ _
P
L
CB
C
L
C
IP
DE
D
M
Rad.
Pg.
Rec.
Typ.
WM
P.O.B.
P.O.L.
PRM
R&C
Rfd.
Set
- Official Records Book
- Chain Link Fence- Wood Fence
- Plat Book
- Plat
- Non-Radial
- Nail & Disk
UE
- Length (Arc)
- Finished Floor Elevation
- Drainage Easement
- Concrete Monument
- Concrete Block
- Iron Pipe
- Found
- Easement
- Description
- Centerline
- Calculated
- Concrete
- Measured
R
PC
PI
PP
PT
- Set ½" Rebar &
Cap "LB 7623"
- Utility Easement
- Water Meter
- Delta (Central Angle)
- Roofed
- Typical
- Point of Curvature
- Point of Intersection
- Point of Beginning
- Point on Line
- Power Pole
- Permanent Reference
Monument
- Point of Tangency
- Rebar & Cap
- Recovered
- Radius
- Radial
- Page
>Bearing Basis shown hereon, is Assumed and Based upon the Line
>Building Ties are NOT to be used to reconstruct Property Lines.
>Fence Ownership is NOT determined.
>Survey is Based upon the Legal Description Supplied by Client.
>Subject to any Easements and/or Restrictions of Record.
>Roof Overhangs, Underground Utilities and/or Footers have NOT
>Abutting Properties Deeds have NOT been Researched for Gaps,
>Septic Tanks and/or Drainfield locations are approximate and MUST
been located UNLESS otherwise noted.
Overlaps and/or Hiatus.
be verified by appropriate Utility Location Companies.
Denoted with a "BB".
Rebar
-Notes-
>Use of This Survey for Purposes other than Intended, Without
Written Verification, Will be at the User's Sole Risk and Without
Liability to the Surveyor. Nothing Hereon shall be Construed to give
ANY Rights or Benefits to Anyone Other than those Certified.
- Federal EmergencyF.E.M.A.
Management Agency
Drawn By: TCD
Field Date: 02/07/19 Date Completed: 02/09/19
Fax-407.320.8165Office-407.678.3366
R
IR
E
L
I
C
K
I hereby Certify that this Boundary Survey of the above Described Property is
under my Direction on the Date Shown, Based on Information furnished to Me
as Noted and Conforms to the Standard of Practice for Land
Surveying in the State of Florida in accordance with Chapter 5J-17.052 Florida
Administrative Codes, Pursuant to Section 472.027 Florida Statutes.
True and Correct to the Best of my Knowledge and Belief as recently Surveyed
D
A
P
N
SU
R
V
E
YL
A
N
D
L
A
&
M
A
PP
E
R
A
D
IOR
F
L
NO. 6637
STATE OF
A
T
E
CI
FI
C
E
R
T
O
R
P
R
OF
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
T
FIRM
THE
FOR
This Survey is intended ONLY for the use of Said Certified Parties.
This Survey NOT VALID UNLESS Signed and Embossed with Surveyor's Seal.
Patrick K. Ireland PSM 6637 LB 7623
by NOR given to this Surveying Company at the time of this Endeavor.
affected by Flood Factors and/or other information NEITHER known
is Subject to Final Approval by F.E.M.A. This Determination may be
>Flood Zone Determination Shown Heron is Given as a Courtesy, and
Ireland & Associates Surveying Inc. and the signing surveyor assume
NO Liability for the Accuracy of this Determination.
CERTIFIED TO:
Flood Disclaimer:
Please See Attached Legal Exhibit For Legal Descriptions.
O
1301 S. International Parkway Suite 2001
Lake Mary, Florida 32746
www.irelandsurveying.com
S
E
S
W
S
N
E
EW
N
W
N
0' 20' 40'
Graphic Scale
Scale: 1"=40'
80'
Fnd. 2" Iron P
ipe
(N
o Identification)
Fnd. 2" Iron P
ipe
(N
o Identification)
Fnd. 1/2" R
ebar
(N
o Identification)
Fnd. 5/8" R
ebar
(N
o Identification)
LONNEY JOHNSON AND PATRICIA JOHNSON; Z PROPERTIES.
(P
roposed P
arcel A
)
Northw
est C
orner of
Lot 4
Point of
Begining
24.0'
8.0'
8.0
'
5.4'
9.3
'
2.0'6.7'
3.0
'
3.0'
4.4
'
13.0'
19.6'
22.7'
6.8'
13.2'
20.0'
13.2'
35.9'
4.0'
4.0'
10.1'
12.2'
22.5'
5.4'
5.4'
12.0'
12.0'
22.5'
27.0'
4.3'
7.3'
3.0'
12.4'
11.0'
3'
2'
9
2
.
9
6
9
2
.
3
6
9
2
.
4
0
9
2
.
1
6
9
2
.
1
9
9
2
.
0
9
9
2
.
5
7
9
2
.
5
6
9
2
.
5
1
9
2
.
4
1
9
2
.
2
7
9
2
.
2
0
9
2
.
1
6
9
2
.
1
4
9
2
.
3
9
2
.
4
9
2
.
5
9
2
.
2
9
2
.
0
9
2
.
7
9
3
.
0
9
3
.
1
9
2
.
8
9
2
.
8
9
2
.
8
9
2
.
8
9
2
.
6
9
2
.
0
9
2
.
2
9
2
.
6
9
2
.
6
9
2
.
7
9
2
.
9
9
3
.
0
9
2
.
9
9
2
.
8
9
2
.
9
9
2
.
7
9
2
.
5
9
2
.
6
9
2
.
2
9
2
.
1
9
1
.
9
9
1
.
9
9
2
.
0
9
1
.
4
9
1
.
7
9
1
.
8
9
1
.
6
9
1
.
4
9
1
.
2
9
1
.
0
9
0
.
6
9
0
.
8
9
1
.
2
9
0
.
9
9
0
.
7
9
0
.
6
9
0
.
4
9
0
.
4
9
0
.
5 9
0
.
6
9
0
.
6
9
0
.
3
8
7
.
1
8
7
.
2
8
7
.
4
9
1
.
7
9
1
.
7
9
1
.
8
9
1
.
79
1
.
4
9
0
.
9
9
0
.
7
9
0
.
9
9
1
.
4
9
1
.
9
9
2
.
0 9
2
.
0
9
2
.
0
9
1
.
9
9
1
.
6
9
1
.
5
9
1
.
6
9
0
.
9
9
1
.
0
9
1
.
1
9
3
.
1
9
2
.
0
9
1
.
6
9
1
.
0
9
1
.
0
9
1
.
0
9
1
.
0
9
0
.
5
9
0
.
5
9
0
.
5
9
0
.
5
9
1
.
0
#1
#2
Florida Department of Transportation GPS Network.
(Elevations are based upon NAVD 88 Datum)
FDoT GPS Network
Set Nail & Disk LB# 7623 in Asphalt.
Elevation: 92.28'
-Site Benchmark Information-
Set Nail & Disk LB# 7623.
Elevation: 91.89'
-Benchmark Information-
N90° 00' 00"E(C)
956.7'(P)
Set 1/2" Rebar &
Cap LB# 7623
Fnd. 3/4" Iron Pipe
& Cap PLS #4919
(3.4' N, 0.0')
Fnd. 1/2" Rebar
& Cap (Illegible)
(2.0'N, 0.8'E)
Set 1/2" Rebar &
Cap LB# 7623
Plat Corner
Northwest Corner of Lot 1
Fnd. 2" Iron Pipe
(No Identification)
(0.0,3.1'W)
PI of Lots 6 &
7
Not Located
All Bearing Shown
Hereon Are Assumed
Survey is Based Upon
Field Monumentation &
Occupation
#1
#2
175.82'(M)150.17'(M)
397.87'(M)
N90° 00' 00"E(M)
959.76'(M)
290.33'(M
)
S00° 00' 0
0"W
(C
)
One Story
Residence #1756
FFE = 94.29'
5.4'
143.34'(C
)
Garage
FFE = 91.71'
109.25'(M)
25.00'(D)
Proposed P
arcel Line
121.7'(P)
25.00'(D)
S00° 16' 07"E
(M
)
Fnd. 1/2" Rebar
(No Identification)
24.85'(C)
"BB"
N90° 00' 00"E(C)
Fnd. 5/8" Rebar
& Cap(Illegible)
110.00'(D)
145.00'(P
)
N89° 34' 38"W(C)
144.16
'(C
)
110.00'(D)
40.00'(P) 45.00'(P)
Shed
14
5.00'(P
)
0.0'
0.4'S
0.9'E
0.2'S
Set 1/2" Rebar &
Cap LB# 7623
Tree Note:
Palm - Denotes Tree Type
(18") - Diameter of Tree measured at Chest Height
Palm
(18")
Magnolia
(18")
Oak
(18")
Crepe Myrtle
(18")
Camphor
(18")
Unknown
(18")
Palm
(36")
C
r
e
p
e
M
y
r
t
l
e
(
8
"
)
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
(
1
0
"
)
O
a
k
(
1
2
"
)
Oak
(20")
Oak
(20")
Oak
(10")
Magnolia
(10")
Camphor
(32")
Cam
phor
(8
")
0.0'
0.0'
6.8'
14
.5
'
14.8'
17.6'
34.8'
18.0'
46
.6
'
48.8'
- Back Flow Preventor
- Water Meter
He
dg
e
By performing a search with the local governing municipality or www.fema.gov, the property appears to be located in zone X.
This Property was found in CITY OF WINTER PARK, community number 120188, dated 9/25/2009.
Sheet 1 of 2
ww
w.ire
la
nd
su
rve
yin
g.co
m
La
ke
M
ary, F
lo
rid
a 3
27
46
13
01
S
. In
te
rn
atio
na
l P
arkw
ay S
uite
2
00
1
Office-407.678.3366
Sketch of D
escription
Th
is is N
OT
a
S
urve
y.
Th
is is O
NL
Y a
S
ke
tch
.
Fax-407.320.8165
Sh
ee
t 2
o
f 2
S
E
S
W
S
N
E
EW
N
W
N
NO
T T
o S
ca
le
File
N
o. IS
-5
60
79
Not Included in this Legal D
escription
The R
em
aining P
ortion of Lot 6
N90° 00' 00"E
126.66'
N90° 00' 00"E50.00'
N90° 00' 00"E 59.25'
N0
0° 0
2' 1
1"W
14
3.3
4'
S89° 34' 38"E
50.00'
S0
0° 0
2' 1
1"E
14
3.7
1'
S89° 34' 38"E
59.84'
S0
0° 1
6' 0
7"E
14
4.1
6'
N90° 00' 00"E721.51'
S0
0° 0
2' 0
0"W
29
0.3
1'
N89° 59' 37"E
149.40'
175.82'
N90° 00' 00"EN90° 00' 00"E
398.69'
W 1/2 of
Lot 6
Lot 5
Lot 4
Lot 7
Lot 34
Lot 35
Lot 36Lot 37
Lot 38
Lot 3
Lot 2
Lot 1
PI o
f L
ots 9
&
1
0
PI o
f L
ots 1
2 &
1
3
Pla
t C
orn
er
Pla
t C
orn
er
Pla
t C
orn
er
No
rth
we
st C
orn
er
of L
ot 1
N0
0° 0
2' 1
1"W
14
3.7
1'
40.00'
40.00'
45.00'
24.84'
We
st L
in
e o
f L
ot 4
Ea
st L
in
e o
f th
e W
est 1
/2
o
f L
ot 6
(Asphalt Road)
(50' Right-of-Way)
Hollywood Avenue
CC
L L
Point of
Com
mencem
ent
(P
arce
l A
)
No
rth
we
st C
orn
er
of L
ot 4
Point of
Begining
(P
arce
l B
)
Point of
Begining
45.00' 24.84'
Parcel A
Area: 7,176.26 Sq Ft
Parcel B
Area: 8,570.19 Sq Ft
South Line of Lot 5
ww
w.irelandsurveying.com
Lake M
ary, F
lorida 32746
1301 S
. International P
arkw
ay S
uite 2001
Office-407.678.3366
Ske
tch
o
f D
escrip
tio
n
Th
is is N
OT
a
S
urve
y.
Th
is is O
NL
Y a
S
ke
tch
.
Fax-407.320.8165
Sh
ee
t 2
o
f 2
S
E
S
W
S
N
E
EW
N
W
N
NO
T T
o S
ca
le
File N
o. IS
-56079
Not Included in this Legal D
escription
The R
em
aining P
ortion of Lot 6
N90° 00' 00"E
126.66'
N90° 00' 00"E50.00'
N90° 00' 00"E 59.25'
N00° 02' 11"W
143.34'
S89° 34' 38"E
50.00'
S00° 02' 11"E
143.71'
S89° 34' 38"E
59.84'
S00° 16' 07"E
144.16'
N90° 00' 00"E721.51'
S00° 02' 00"W
290.31'
N89° 59' 37"E
149.40'
175.82'
N90° 00' 00"EN90° 00' 00"E
398.69'
W 1/2 of
Lot 6
Lot 5
Lot 4
Lot 7
Lot 34
Lot 35
Lot 36Lot 37
Lot 38
Lot 3
Lot 2
Lot 1
PI of Lots 9 &
10
PI of Lots 12 &
13
Plat C
orner
Plat C
orner
Plat C
orner
Northw
est C
orner
of Lot 1
N00° 02' 11"W
143.71'
40.00'
40.00'
45.00'24.84'
West Line of Lot 4
East Line of the W
est 1/2 of Lot 6
(Asphalt Road)
(50' Right-of-Way)
Hollywood Avenue
CC
L L
Point of
Com
mencem
ent
(P
arcel B
)
Point of
Begining
45.00' 24.84'
Parcel A
Area: 7,176.26 Sq Ft
Parcel B
Area: 8,570.19 Sq Ft
South Line of Lot 6
N90° 00' 00"E176.66'
1
Allison McGillis
From: DONALD SCHAEFER <[email protected]>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 10:58 AMTo: Allison McGillisSubject: 1756 Hollywood Ave Subdivision Request
Allison McGillis Senior Planner City of Winter Park We do not want the Planning and Zoning Board to approve the subdivision of the property at 1756 Hollywood Avenue as requested by the Z Properties Group Inc. The current owners were fully aware when they purchased this 110 foot property in 1997, that there existed a minimum 75 foot lot width requirement that precluded the further subdivision of their property. The requested subdivision, if approved, would inappropriately result in 2 non‐conforming properties that do not meet the long established 75 foot standard. In addition, the creation of these 2 smaller lots is also in conflict with the quality of life and significant financial investment already made by the owners of 4 homes on Hollywood Avenue that have chosen to purchase lots that exceed the 75 foot width requirement. We also are concerned that the home to be constructed on the 50 foot lot would encroach on the esthetics of Smiley Park and leave little room for the planting of a oak tree that is now required to replace the very large oak that was storm damaged and recently removed by the current owners. Donald and Maureen Schaefer 1770 Hollywood Ave Sent from my iPad
1
Allison McGillis
From: Tim Varan (Tim Talks Wine) <[email protected]>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 11:38 AMTo: Allison McGillisSubject: A pleas against Z Properties to divide 1756 Hollywood Ave.
Follow Up Flag: FollowUpFlag Status: Flagged
Dear Ms. McGillis, As a resident at 1799 Greenwich Ave., I would like to let it be know that my wife, Susan, and I are against the request of Z Properties Group to divide the property at 1756 Hollywood Ave. We purchased our property in 1999 because we loved the feel of this neighborhood, and saw it as a wonderful place to raise our children. Recently we have watched as many of the modest single family homes are being sold, and knocked down to accomodate one oversized mansion after another. We feel these houses look out of place in our neighborhood, and although shiny and new, detract from the comfortable feel of our city. One only needs to look at the nearly 4000 square foot monstrosity next to our own home to see the absurdity of the situation. It is time that the city commission and the zoning board realize that lot sizes and density requirements were put in place for a reason. Street after street in the blocks surrounding our area are slowly taking on the feel of a development, when you allow houses grossly out of proportion to the property to be built. To assume a single family house would fit in our area on a 60 foot lot would be exactly the same thinking as they have in densely populated portions of Orange County, such as Lake Nona, Avalon Park and Windermere, but not Winter Park. We ask that you respect and continue to uphold the zoning ordinances that are already in place for Winter Park, that have made it the charming and unique place it is. Regards, Tim and Susan Varan 1799 Greenwich Ave. Winter Park FL 32789
1
Allison McGillis
From: Evaristo Martinez <[email protected]>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 11:52 PMTo: Allison McGillisSubject: Letter in opposition of variance requested to split lot at 1756 Hollywood Avenue
Follow Up Flag: FollowUpFlag Status: Flagged
February 23, 2019 Allison McGillis Senior Planner City of Winter Park 401 S Park Avenue Winter Park, FL 32789 RE: Opposition to request to split lot at 1756 Hollywood Avenue Dear Allison McGillis: We am writing in opposition to the request to split lot at 1756 Hollywood Avenue, Winter Park, FL
32789.
The change is opposed by the overwhelming majority of our neighbors.
If granted, the variance requested will change the character of our neighborhood and diminish the
value of our properties.
The requester of the variance will not suffer any economic burden is the variance is denied. On the
other hand, if it is granted, the rest of us will suffer loss of property value.
The minimum lot front width and total square footage should be respected.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely, Maria T Garcia Evaristo M Martinez Owners and dwellers of 1745 Hollywood Avenue Winter Park, FL 32789
1
Allison McGillis
From: Kathy Traexler <[email protected]>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:03 PMTo: Allison McGillisSubject: 1756 Hollywood request to divide property
Hello Ms. McGillis I have lived on Hollywood Avenue for the last 14 years and I love my neighborhood - the individual houses have so much character and the ancient trees speak to the history of the area. Occasionally an older house will be bought and demolished (or moved) and a newer, larger house will be built. That seems to be the natural progression of development. What seems unnatural to me is taking a generously sized lot and splitting off a 50-foot sliver to build a new house upon, as is proposed with 1756 Hollywood Ave. Furthermore, the proposed 50-foot wide lot would be next to the Marvin Smiley Park at the corner of Hollywood and Phelps. The park is a lovely corner lot with an ancient live oak and large camellia bushes and the proposed house would abut this peaceful setting, making it not nearly as peaceful. I urge you not to approve the zoning variance to split the lot and create a 50-foot wide lot. Zoning exists for a reason -- to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood. Thank you for your time Kathy Traexler 1820 Hollywood Ave
CITY OF WINTER PARK PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Staff Report
March 5, 2019
REQUEST OF FG SCHAUB CUSTOM HOMES FOR: SUBDIVISION OR LOT SPLIT APPROVAL TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY AT 444 SHEPARD AVENUE, ZONED R-1A, INTO TWO SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING LOTS. BOTH LOTS WILL HAVE 75 FEET OF LOT WIDTH AND 11,250 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA. BOTH LOTS MEET THE 75 FEET OF LOT WIDTH AND 8,500 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA REQUIRED IN THE R-1A ZONING AND NO VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED.
FG Schaub Custom Homes, LLC (contract purchasers) are requesting subdivision or lot split approval to divide the property at 444 Shepherd Avenue into two single-family lots. The zoning of this property is R-1A. Each lot is proposed to be 75 feet wide and 11,250 square feet in size. Both lots will meet the 8,500 square feet minimum lot size and 75 foot lot width requirements of R-1A. The property is currently developed with one single-family home that will be demolished. During the City’s review process of subdivisions or lot split requests, there are two criteria that are reviewed. First is the ‘Zoning Test’ as to conformance with the zoning criteria. The next is the ‘Comprehensive Plan Test’ which is conformance to the neighborhood character. ZONING TEST: This existing property is 150 feet wide on Shepherd Avenue, and measures approximately 22,500 square feet in size. The subdivided lots are proposed to be 75 feet wide and 11,250 square feet in size. The R-1A zoning requires a minimum of 75 feet of lot width, and a minimum of 8,500-square feet of land area. Thus, this request meets the R-1A lot dimension standards, and no variances are requested. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEST: There are many neighborhoods in the City that are zoned R-1AA or R-1A, but the existing character may be significantly different than the zoning code minimums. As a result, the practice outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Subdivision Code (attached) is to look at the surrounding neighborhood to compare the standard lot sizes. The Code dictates that the review area is within a 500-foot radius of the subject property, and limited to those in the same zoning. There are 76 homes within this neighborhood with the same R-1A zoning (see attached map). The average lot width is 82.4 feet, and the median lot width is 75 feet. The average lot area from this 76 home survey is 12,784 square feet, and the median lot area is 12,458 square feet. The proposed lot widths and sizes are slightly smaller than the average and median of the neighborhood, but still compare favorably to the neighborhood. APPLICABLE CODES: The applicable Comprehensive Plan policy and Subdivision Code section governing lot splits are on the following page.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS: The applicant has provided a generalized front elevation for the type of homes that they plan to build, and general site plans for the layout of the proposed new homes. The applicants will comply with the normal single-family development standards, setbacks, etc. DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES: Lot split requests like these give the City an opportunity to provide input to the developers to encourage variety and character in their design to enhance our single-family neighborhoods. As mentioned, the applicant provided generalized front elevations of the types of homes they plan to build, which depict two slightly different architectural elevations for the homes. Staff suggests that the final front elevations of the homes be of varied architectural styles to each other to provide diversity to the neighborhood. SUMMARY: The request meets all of the R-1A zoning requirements for lot sizes, and no variances are requested. This request also passes the Comprehensive Plan test. Staff Recommendation is for APPROVAL, with the following conditions:
1. That the final front elevations of the homes be of varied architectural styles to each other to provide diversity to the neighborhood.
RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY:
Policy 1-3.6.8: Subdivision of Land and Lot Splits for Non-Lakefront Single Family and Low Density Multi-Family Property. The City shall consider approving subdivision and lot split applications, which are not lakefront properties and which are not estate lots in areas designated single family, low density or multi-family residential, when the proposed new lots are designed at size and density consistent with the existing conditions in the surrounding neighborhood within a radius of five hundred (500) feet.
ARTICLE VI. - SUBDIVISION AND LOT CONSOLIDATION REGULATIONS
Sec. 58-377. - Conformance to the comprehensive plan.
(a) In the City of Winter Park, as a substantially developed community, the review of lot splits, lot consolidations, plats, replats or subdivisions within developed areas of the city shall insure conformance with the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan as a precedent to the conformance with other technical standards or code requirements. (b) In existing developed areas and neighborhoods, all proposed lots shall conform to the existing area of neighborhood density and layout. The proposed lot sizes, widths, depths, shape, access arrangement, buildable areas and orientation shall conform to the neighborhood standards and existing conditions. This provision is specifically intended to allow the denial or revision by the city of proposed lot splits, lot consolidations, plats, replats or subdivisions when those are not in conformance with the existing neighborhood density or standards, even if the proposed lots meet the minimum technical requirements of the zoning regulations. (c) In determining the existing area or neighborhood density and standards, for the consideration of lot splits, plats, replats or subdivision of other than estate lots or lakefront lots, the planning and zoning commission and city commission shall consider the frontage and square foot area of home sites and vacant properties with comparable zoning within an area of 500-foot radius from the proposed subdivision. (d) In order to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan, the city commission may also impose restrictions on the size, scale, and style of proposed building, structures, or other improvements. This provision shall enable the city commission to impose restrictions on the size, height, setback, lot coverage, impervious area or right-of-way access such that proposed building and other improvements match the dimension and character of the surrounding area or neighborhood.
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
75
2525
91
45
90
50
15
50
25
35
91
51
75
515151
25
42
3125
75
50
50 50
50
50
5050
50
25
50 2525
14
75 25 50
1455
757575
212914
29
50
70
6060
60 60 60 61 3614
75
50
15
40 40
25
3531
71
7171
717171
717171
50
50
50
64
25
60
45
644848
50
50
50
45
5050
64
5050
51 5151
60
60 60
6060 60
75
50
50
5050
25
25 75
75
7019
70
707070
70 70 70
35
71
7171
6464
16 16
50
50
5050
50
5050
5050
50
75
50
50
50
5050
50
505050
50
5042
4243
2550
75 75
50 25
36
75
36
14
30
30
61
3255
50
2525
25
71
71
71
71
71
50
50 50
50
50
5050
50
50
50
50
50
50
5075
25
5050
54
50
50
50
7536
20
19
70
70
60
50
71
71
64
60
64
5071
43
32
45
2525
50
42
50
100
160
140140
150
150
150146
160
150150
150
150
150
200
200
200
126
140
125
125
125
125
125
125
142
200 200
200
120
150
150
200
200
142
150
125
125
146
126
160
142
150
150
200
140
160
200
127
127
127
127
8.74
29.1
49.7
49.7
34.3
30.1
14.7
18.7
15.4
62.5
29.1
49.7 49.7
49.7
49.7
49.7
49.7
34.3
69.3
49.7
20.6
49.7
62.5
49.7
49.7
93.33
46.42
93.33
41.26
51.2651
.26
78.33
139.3
134.5
41.26
71.95153.5
113.9
113.7
152.6
71.95
196.5
196.5
25.75
99.27
46.42
46.42
46.42
46.42
46.42
113.8
139.2
6
139.2
6
193+/-
237+/-
249.2
6
151.75
151.75
151.7511
3.83
179.34
165.17
175.55
185+
/-
113.7
6
221+/-
230+
/-
178.51
249.2
6
151.75
151.75
176.44
174.67
151.75
142.45
207+/-
234+/-
221.4
5
139.2
6
AL OMA AVE
NPH
ELPS
AVE
BRYAN AVE
MAIDENLN
ANZL E AVE
EDWIN BLV D
SYLV
AN D
R
SHEP
HERD
AVE
COMPREHENSIVEPLAN TEST
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
444 Shepherd Avenue
Average Lot Width = 82.4 ftMedian Lot Width = 75 ft
Average Lot Size = 12,784 sq ftMedian Lot Size = 12,458 sq ft
NOTES
Single-Family Lots Within 500' of Site(76 total)
LEGENDSubject Site
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 2/11/2019 9:58 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 2/11/2019 9:58 Aerial 2018 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Elevation #1
Elevation #2
CITY OF WINTER PARK PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Staff Report
March 5, 2019
REQUEST OF V3 CAPITAL GROUP LLC TO: AMEND THE "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN” FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO CHANGE FROM A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO AN OFFICE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE PROPERTIES AT 1419 AND 1421 TROVILLION AVENUE. REQUEST OF V3 CAPITAL GROUP LLC TO: AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO CHANGE FROM MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) DISTRICT ZONING TO OFFICE (O-2) DISTRICT ZONING ON THE PROPERTIES AT 1419 AND 1421 TROVILLION AVENUE. REQUEST OF V3 CAPITAL GROUP LLC FOR: CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY, 30,000 SQUARE FOOT, OFFICE BUILDING ON THE COMBINED PROPERTIES AT 1424 AND 1428 GAY ROAD AND 1419 AND 1421 TROVILLION AVENUE.
V3 Capital Group, contract purchaser for the properties, is requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use (FLU) designation and to rezone 1419 and 1421 Trovillion Avenue from Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) to Office (O-2). These two properties are part of a larger property purchase contract in the same ownership that are currently zoned O-2, at 1424 and 1428 Gay Road. This action would unify the entire combined property with an Office FLU designation and O-2 zoning. Lastly, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use approval to construct a new two-story, 30,000 square foot office building on the combined properties. Site & Context: The combined properties with requested FLU amendments and rezoning, 1419 and 1421 Trovillion Avenue, measure 56,338 square feet in size (1.3 acres). The other two office properties in the purchase contract at 1424 and 1428 Gay Road measure 17,699 square feet in size (0.41 acres). To the north of the combined site is commercial development; to the east are office and commercial properties; to the south are the Killarney Bay Condos (zoned R-3) and to the west are the Chateau Du Lac Condos (zoned R-3). Therefore, the re-designation from medium density residential to office would match the properties to the east and would be an appropriate zoning for the area. Analysis of the Land Use Request: These properties have had previous requests before the City for land use changes and Conditional Use requests. As the Board may recall, in 2016, a request was made for a Conditional Use approval for a Ladybird Academy daycare/pre-school, keeping the existing R-3 and O-2 mixed zoning on the properties. The City Commission denied the request due to the neighborhood concerns of traffic and noise for this type of use.
Then in 2017, a request was made to unify the zoning of the combined properties to R-3 zoning. This would have allowed for, on the combined 1.7 acres, a total of up to 29 residential units. The applicant at the time, included two possible development plans showing 25 and 28 townhouse units. The request did not include a Conditional Use with an approval of the specific plans. The City Commission denied the request due to neighborhood concerns of dense residential development, and the uncertainty of the proposed project. Proposed Project Plans: As previously mentioned, this combined project site measures 1.7 acres (74,037 square feet) in size. The proposed office building is an approximately 30,000 square foot two-story building that measures thirty (30) feet in height. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) equals 41%. The project is meeting the required setbacks for the site with the exception of the southern face of the building, which is proposing a twenty (20) foot setback in lieu of the required thirty (30) foot rear setback. The applicant is proposing a ten (10) foot landscape buffer and a six (6) foot masonry wall to mitigate this setback encroachment to the adjacent office property to the south. The project meets the remaining code requirements with respect to height, storm water retention, impervious coverage, etc., refer to table below (text in bold indicates a variance request).
O-2 Requirements Project Proposal Property Size 1.7 acres
Floor Area Ratio Max. 45% 41% Lot Coverage Max. 85% 75.8%
Min. Open Space Min. 15% 24.2% Gay Road Setback 10 feet 10 feet
Trovillion Avenue Setback 10 feet 166 feet Rear Setback (southeast) 30 feet 20 feet
Western Side Setback 15 feet 135 feet Eastern Side Setback 5 feet 10 feet
Landscape Protection Zone 8 feet 10-15 feet Bldg. Height 35 feet 30 feet
Site Plan/Architectural Image: The orientation of the building at the front of the lot on Gay Road screens more of the view of the parking lot. This placement also coincides with the urban form that staff has developed for design guidelines along other corridors. Another advantage is that it keeps the building further away from the adjacent residential properties. Perspective elevations are attached, depicting the look of the proposed office building. The City Architect has reviewed the elevations, and has some recommendations to enhance the appearance of the building. These are preliminary elevations, and the applicant’s architect has not yet met with the City Architect to discuss these enhancements in design and material selection. Staff is recommending a condition that the final architectural elevations come back to the P&Z Board at a later date for final approval. This application package does not include the proposed signage. However, staff is recommending a condition that ground signage be restricted to a non-interior illuminated monument sign, which the applicant is in agreement with.
Parking & Traffic Impact: The required parking for the project is one parking space for every 250 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, and then one parking space for every 333 square feet above 20,000 square feet. Based on the 30,000 square feet proposed, the required parking is 104 parking spaces. The site plan shows thee spaces over code requirements at 107 spaces. Bicycle parking is provided to meet code. The applicant is proposing two entrances to the project, one on Gay Road and another on Trovillion Avenue. Currently, Trovillion Avenue is signed as right-in/right-out due to its proximity to the light at Gay Road, and the difficulties of turning left across Orlando Avenue. This connection would allow the residences at the Killarney Bay condos and other business on Trovillion Avenue to have access to the lighted intersection at Gay Road. The only concern with this connection is the direct and straight-through access that the applicant is proposing. Staff has discussed with the applicant, moving the Trovillion Avenue access point further to the east to create more of a curvilinear path to slowdown traffic through the parking lot. The applicant has agreed to this change, but anticipates that one or two spaces would be lost to accommodate turning radii. Since the project is proposing an extra three parking spaces, this would still meet code requirements. Generally, the traffic generation from a multi-family project is lower than from office buildings during the week but higher on the weekends. With the existing Medium Density Residential FLU designation on the Trovillion properties, that land could be used for a 2-3 story multi-family project of up to 22 units. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation rates, that scenario would generate 128 daily trips. The Gay Road properties now zoned Office could be used for a 2-story, 8,000 square foot office building, which based on ITE rates would generate 93 daily trips. This would be 221 total trips between the two uses. Based on the Traffic Analysis provided by the applicant, there will be 302 net new daily trips from this proposed 30,000 square foot office building. Therefore, the difference in traffic from what could be built under current Zoning versus the proposed Zoning and the Conditional Use request is 81 additional trips. The Traffic Analysis states that these 81 additional trips are not expected to adversely affect the traffic operations along Gay Road or at the signalized intersection of Orlando Avenue and Gay Road. Landscaping: The preliminary landscape plan that was provided by the applicant has been reviewed by the City’s Urban Forestry department. They have stated that the protected trees that are being removed are not in the best shape, and would like additional shade trees to be planted within the right-of-ways. This 30,000 square foot building right at the ten foot required setback on Gay Road will set the tone for future redevelopment in this area. Therefore, planning staff is also recommending landscaping above and beyond code requirements to be implemented within the front setback and the areas between the parking spaces and Gay Road, as well as Trovillion Avenue. Other Items from Departmental Review: The Public Works department has requested that the applicant replace the existing sidewalk along Gay Road with a new eight (8) foot sidewalk. With the multiple condominiums, Plymouth Senior Living facility, and commercial shopping center surrounding this project, the there is considerable pedestrian activity on Gay Road. The current sidewalk is only four feet wide, thus requiring the applicant to
implement this upgrade reinforces the city’s Comprehensive Plan transportation policies to give pedestrian mobility the priority. Summary: The two properties, 1419 and 1421 Trovillion Avenue, requested for office land use, are mostly being utilized as parking for the project. This provides the residential properties to the south and west a large buffer to the main operations of the project. It is also logical to the planning staff that this combined property, which is under one ownership and being sold together, have a unified Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation. This office development of 30,000 square feet is significantly less than what could be built under the existing R-3 and O-2 zoning designations. The R-3 zoning portion of the site could yield 22 units with a maximum building size of 61,972 square feet under the maximum FAR of 110%. The O-2 portion of the site could yield 8,000 square feet of office under the maximum FAR of 45%. The combined 69,972 square feet is significantly less building area than the 30,000 square feet proposed. In a location with the same land use and zoning to the east and to the southeast, and office/commercial zoning to the north, the requested land use designations are compatible. Along with the conditions previously outlined and the design of the project with the building at the front of the lot on Gay Road, staff feels that this project will be a compatible transition to the residential properties in the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT, REZONING REQUESTS, AND CONDITIONAL USE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That the final architectural elevations and materials of the proposed office building, be revised in consultation with the City Architect and that such architectural elevations and materials be subsequently approved by the P&Z Board and City Commission after input and dialogue with the City Architect.
2. That the project be restricted to a non-interior illuminated monument ground sign.
3. That the Trovillion Avenue access point be relocated further to the east to create more of a curvilinear path to slowdown traffic through the parking lot.
4. That landscaping above and beyond code requirements be implemented within the front setback and the areas between the parking spaces and Gay Road, as well as Trovillion Avenue.
5. That the applicant replace the existing sidewalk along Gay Road with a new eight (8) foot sidewalk.
1428 14241419
1421
£¤17
£¤92
N OR
LAND
O AV
E
KILLARNEY BAY CT
TROVILLION AVE
W CANTON AVE
GAY R D
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
TROVILLION AVE &GAY ROAD REQUEST
Location Map
1428 1424
14191421
£¤17
£¤92
N OR
LAND
O AV
E
KILLARNEY BAY CT
TROVILLION AVE
W CANTON AVE
GAY RD
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
TROVILLION AVE &GAY ROAD REQUEST
Future Land Use
LegendCommercialOffice ProfessionalInstitutionalMedium Density Residential
1428 1424
14191421
£¤17
£¤92
N OR
LAND
O AV
E
KILLARNEY BAY CT
TROVILLION AVE
W CANTON AVE
GAY RD
®
City of Winter ParkFlorida
TROVILLION AVE &GAY ROAD REQUEST
Zoning
LegendC-1 C-3 O-2R-3
PROJECT LOCATION
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT LOCATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PROJECT TEAM
V3 CAPITAL GROUP, LLC1009 MAITLAND CENTER COMMONS BLVD.SUITE 209MAITLAND, FL 32751CONTACT: TREY VICKPHONE: (321) 663-0454EMAIL: [email protected]
ACCUMAP SURVEYING, LLC2919 MONTFICHET LANEWINTER PARK, FL 32792CONTACT: DONALD A. HORNE, PSMPHONE: (407) 657-2568EMAIL: [email protected]
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES189 SOUTH ORANGE AVE, SUITE 1000ORLANDO, FL 32801CONTACT: JONATHAN A. MARTIN, P.E.PHONE: (407) 898-1511EMAIL: [email protected]
GAY ROAD OFFICE COMPLEX
PARCEL # 01-22-29-4184-02-060
NO
RTH
SECTION 01, TOWNSHIP 22S, RANGE 29E
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHN.T.S.
PROJECT LOCATION
NORTH
PREPARED BY
DEVELOPER ENGINEER SURVEYOR
1428 GAY ROADWINTER PARK, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 5, 2019LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 AND 11, BLOCK B, KILLARNEY SHORES, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLATTHEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK Q, PAGE 135, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA.
AND
THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE VACATED STREET LYING WEST OF LOT 8, BLOCK B, KILLARNEYSHORES, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK Q, PAGE135, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LAND LYING ON THE NORTHTHEREOF EXTENDING TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GAY ROAD, BEING A PART OFVACATED SOUTH BOULEVARD;
AND
THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE VACATED STREET LYING WEST OF LOT 9, BLOCK B, KILLARNEYSHORES, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK Q, PAGE 135,PUBLIC RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL # 01-22-29-4184-02-050
PARCEL # 01-22-29-4184-02-070
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT /CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
PARCEL # 01-22-29-4184-02-090
Sheet List TableSheet Number Sheet Title
DP0.0 COVERDP1.0 OVERALL SITE PLANDP2.0 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLANDP3.0 UTILITY PLANL1.0 LANDSCAPE PLANS-1 SURVEY
ES-10 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
TROVILLION AVENUE
(60' PUBLIC R/W)
GAY ROAD
(60' PUBLIC R/W)
GA
Y R
OA
D O
FF
IC
E
CO
MP
LE
X
OV
ER
ALL S
IT
E P
LA
N©
DP1.0
NORTH
TROVILLION AVENUE(60' PUBLIC R/W)
GAY ROAD(60' PUBLIC R/W)
PROPOSED BUILDING30,000± SFFFE=93.00
EXFILTRATION TRENCHCAPACITY=9,118 CU.FT.
GA
Y R
OA
D O
FFIC
EC
OM
PLE
XP
AV
ING
, GR
AD
ING
,A
ND
DR
AIN
AG
E P
LAN
©
DP2.0
NORTH
DRAINAGE NOTE:
LEGEND
NOTES:
PROPOSED BUILDING30,000± SF
LEGEND
GA
Y R
OA
D O
FFIC
EC
OM
PLE
XU
TILI
TY P
LAN
DP3.0
NORTH
UTILITY NOTE:
NOTES:
UTILITY NOTE:
NOTES:
PROPOSED BUILDING30,000± SF
GA
Y R
OA
D O
FFIC
EC
OM
PLE
XLA
ND
SC
AP
E P
LAN
L1.0
NORTH
Preliminary Drainage Calculations for SJRWMD & City of Winter Park
Gay Road Office Complex Winter Park, FL Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Orlando, Florida 149973000 January 29, 2019
© Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2019
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Gay Road Office Complex
Preliminary Drainage Calculations for SJRWMD & City of Winter Park
Gay Road Office Complex Winter Park, FL
Prepared for:
Gay Road Office Complex
Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Orlando, Florida 149973000 January 29, 2019
Jonathan A. Martin, P.E. © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2019 FL P.E. # 5405
Basin Area = 1.300 acres
AREA SCS SOIL COVER TYPE AND CONDITIONS CURVE SUB
TYPE NUMBER TOTAL
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
A Cover < 50% 68 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 49 0.0
A Cover > 75% 39 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
B Cover < 50% 79 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 69 0.0
B Cover > 75% 61 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
C Cover < 50% 86 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 79 0.0
C Cover > 75% 74 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
D Cover < 50% 89 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 84 0.0
1.104 D Cover > 75% 80 88.4
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
A Cover < 50% 45 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 35 0.0
A Cover > 75% 25 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
B Cover < 50% 66 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 60 0.0
B Cover > 75% 55 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
C Cover < 50% 77 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 74 0.0
C Cover > 75% 70 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
D Cover < 50% 83 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 80 0.0
D Cover > 75% 77 0.0
A,B,C,D Impervious (Pond) 98 0.0
0.196 A,B,C,D Impervious (Pavement, Concrete, Roofs) 98 19.2
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = 82.7
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = SUM (CN*AREA) / TOTAL AREA
CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEETGATEWAY PRE-DEVELOPMENT BASIN "PRE DA-1"
K:\ORL_Civil\149973000-Gay Road\DRAINAGE\SJRWMD Drainage Calcs.xls
Basin Area = 0.394 acres
AREA SCS SOIL COVER TYPE AND CONDITIONS CURVE SUB
TYPE NUMBER TOTAL
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
A Cover < 50% 68 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 49 0.0
A Cover > 75% 39 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
B Cover < 50% 79 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 69 0.0
B Cover > 75% 61 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
C Cover < 50% 86 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 79 0.0
C Cover > 75% 74 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
D Cover < 50% 89 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 84 0.0
0.378 D Cover > 75% 80 30.2
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
A Cover < 50% 45 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 35 0.0
A Cover > 75% 25 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
B Cover < 50% 66 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 60 0.0
B Cover > 75% 55 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
C Cover < 50% 77 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 74 0.0
C Cover > 75% 70 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
D Cover < 50% 83 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 80 0.0
D Cover > 75% 77 0.0
A,B,C,D Impervious (Pond) 98 0.0
0.016 A,B,C,D Impervious (Pavement, Concrete, Roofs) 98 1.6
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = 80.7
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = SUM (CN*AREA) / TOTAL AREA
CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEETGATEWAY PRE-DEVELOPMENT BASIN "PRE DA-2"
K:\ORL_Civil\149973000-Gay Road\DRAINAGE\SJRWMD Drainage Calcs.xls
Basin Area = 1.694 acres
AREA SCS SOIL COVER TYPE AND CONDITIONS CURVE SUB
TYPE NUMBER TOTAL
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
A Cover < 50% 68 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 49 0.0
A Cover > 75% 39 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
B Cover < 50% 79 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 69 0.0
B Cover > 75% 61 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
C Cover < 50% 86 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 79 0.0
C Cover > 75% 74 0.0
Grass (Lawns, Parks, Golf Courses, etc.)
D Cover < 50% 89 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 84 0.0
0.41 D Cover > 75% 80 32.8
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
A Cover < 50% 45 0.0
A Cover 50% to 75% 35 0.0
A Cover > 75% 25 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
B Cover < 50% 66 0.0
B Cover 50% to 75% 60 0.0
B Cover > 75% 55 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
C Cover < 50% 77 0.0
C Cover 50% to 75% 74 0.0
C Cover > 75% 70 0.0
Woods(Forest, Orchard)
D Cover < 50% 83 0.0
D Cover 50% to 75% 80 0.0
D Cover > 75% 77 0.0
A,B,C,D Impervious (Pond) 98 0.0
1.28 A,B,C,D Impervious (Pavement, Concrete, Roofs) 98 125.9
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = 93.6
WEIGHTED CURVE NUMBER = SUM (CN*AREA) / TOTAL AREA
CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEETGATEWAY PRE-DEVELOPMENT BASIN "POST DA-1"
K:\ORL_Civil\149973000-Gay Road\DRAINAGE\SJRWMD Drainage Calcs.xls
Littoral Zone Provided? NO
Discharge Directly to Class I, II, III or OFW? NO
Offline or Online? Online
Basin Area = 1.69 acres
Impervious Area = 1.28 acres
TV = 0.5" of runoff over site = [(Basin Area)(0.5")]/12" = 0.07 acre-ft.OR
TV = 1.25" of runoff from imp. area = [(Imp Area)(1.25") ]/12" = 0.13 acre-ft.
PLUS
Online TV = 0.5" of runoff from drainage area = [(Basin Area)(0.5")]/12" = 0.07 acre-ft.PLUS
TOTAL REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME = 0.20 acre-ft.
8,905 CF
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUMEONLINE DRY RETENTION
K:\ORL_Civil\149973000-Gay Road\DRAINAGE\SJRWMD Drainage Calcs.xls
149973000
Stage (ft) Area (sq.-ft.) Volume (cu.-ft.) Volume (ac.-ft.) Pipe Diameter (in): 18Trench Bottom 88.0 2,511.48 0.00 0.000 Trench Length (ft): 104.00Bottom of Pipe 88 2,511.48 0.00 0.000 Number of Runs: 32
88.2 4,597.31 589.87 0.014 Perimeter Bedding (ft): 0.7588.3 5,292.58 1,336.56 0.031 Stone Porosity: 0.388.5 5,697.64 2,163.53 0.050 Bedding Depth (ft): 088.6 5,917.62 3,036.69 0.070 Cover Stone Depth (ft): 0.5
Middle of Pipe 88.8 5,987.86 3,931.37 0.090 Number of Headers: 188.9 5,917.62 4,826.05 0.111 Bottom of Trench Elevation (ft): 8889.1 5,697.64 5,699.21 0.131 Treatment Volume Required (cu.-ft.): 8,90589.2 5,292.58 6,526.18 0.15089.4 4,597.31 7,272.87 0.167
Top of Pipe 89.5 2,511.48 7,862.73 0.181 Spacing Between Pipes (ft): 1Top of Trench 90.0 2,511.48 9,118.47 0.209 Trench Width (ft): 80.5
Pipe Length (ft): 100.995
Treatment Volume Provided At Elevation (ft.): 90Treatment Volume Provided (cu.-ft.): 9,118.47Treatment Volume Provided (ac.-ft.): 0.21
Gay Road Office Complex
System Designation
January 29, 2019
kimley-horn.com 189 S Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801 407 898 1511
February 6, 2019
Mr. Trey VickV3 Capital Group, LLC1009 Maitland Center Commons Blvd. Suite 209Maitland, FL 32751
Re: Trip Generation Memorandum
Gay Road
Winter Park, FL
This trip generation memorandum has been prepared in support of the Gay Road redevelopment,located on Gay Road, west of the Winter Park Terrace shopping complex in the city of Winter Park,Florida.
The existing site consists of two (2) single-family detached homes, as shown in the Existing Surveyattachment. The proposed redevelop will consist of up to 30,000 square feet of general office space,as shown in the Conceptual Site Plan attachment.
Trip generation rates for the existing and proposed development scenarios were calculated using the10th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Land UseCode (LUC) 210 was used for the existing development and LUC 710 was used for the proposeddevelopment.
Table 1: Trip Generation Comparison
As shown in Table 1, the proposed redevelopment of the site is anticipated to generate 302 additionalnet new daily trips, 48 AM Peak hour trips (45 in and 3 out), and 34 PM Peak hour trips (4 in and 30out).
The additional trips generated by the proposed development are not expected to adversely affect thetraffic operations along Gay Road or at the signalized intersection of Orlando Avenue & Gay Road.
Total Total Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 2 DU 29 15 14 7 2 5 3 2 1
Total Total Total
General Office Building 710 30.0 KSF 331 166 165 55 47 8 37 6 31
Total Total Total
302 48 34
Land UseITELUC Size Units
Daily Trip Generation
In In Out
AM Peak Hour Trip Generation
Out
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
In Out
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
ADDITIONAL NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
In Out
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
OutLand Use
ITELUC Size
AM Peak Hour Trip Generation
In
Daily Trip GenerationUnits
In Out
In Out
45 3
AM Peak Hour Trip Generation
New External Trips
Net Daily Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
151 151 4 30
In Out In Out
Page 2
kimley-horn.com 189 S Orange Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801 407 898 1511
If you have any questions or comments please let me know.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kenneth K. Siu, P.E.
TROVILLION AVENUE(60' PUBLIC R/W)
GAY ROAD(60' PUBLIC R/W)
PROPOSED BUILDING30,000± SFFFE=93.00
GA
Y R
OA
D O
FFIC
EC
OM
PLE
XO
VE
RA
LL S
ITE
PLA
N©
DP1.0
NORTH
CITY OF WINTER PARK
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Staff Report
March 5, 2019
REQUEST OF BILL BRYAN IMPORTS, INC. FOR: CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO BUILD AN AUTOMATIC CAR WASH FACILITY AT 1350 NORTH ORLANDO AVENUE, ZONED C-3, WHICH IS THE SITE OF THE CURRENT BUFFY CAR WASH.
This public hearing is a Conditional Use request to redevelop the current Buffy Car Wash property at 1350 North Orlando Avenue into a new Raindancer Car Wash operation. The property is zoned C-3 and car wash facilities are a Conditional Use. The former Raindancer Car Wash at 633 North Orlando Avenue, next to the Olive Garden and across from WP Village closed in January 2018 and that property is nearing redevelopment completion as a Charles Schwab financial services office. The former owners of Raindancer have partnered with Bill Bryan, the property owner of the “do-it-yourself” Buffy’s Car Wash at 1350 North Orlando to redevelop the property with a new automatic car wash facility. Project Description: The site is 47,173 square feet in size (1.08 acres). The one-story automatic car wash building of 4,000 square feet in size and 19 feet in height is in the rear of the site, 11 feet from the railroad property. Technically a 30 foot rear setback applies but given that it is the railroad, staff is in support of that setback variance. After you pay for the services and stay in your car as it goes thru the car wash, you drive around to the front where you park at the vacuum stations to complete the process. The impervious coverage of the site is 43.2% which is about half of a typical commercial development. There is ample land in two locations on the north end of the site and up front to accommodate the required storm water retention per City and FDOT requirements. The current property has no storm water retention. The following table outlines the project proposal (text in bold indicates a variance request).
C-3 Requirements Project Proposal Property Size 1.08 acres
Floor Area Ratio Max. 45% 8.5% Lot Coverage Max. 85% 43.2%
Min. Open Space Min. 15% 56.8% Front Setback 15 feet 73 feet
Rear Setback (railroad) 30 feet 10 feet Side Setback 5 feet N/A Bldg. Height 55 feet 18.5 feet
A conceptual landscape plan is included showing the layout of new trees landscaping. Again, with ample land in the front of this project, there are opportunities for new trees and other landscape screening including new oak trees shown along the Orlando Avenue frontage.
The only issue for the staff is the appearance and aesthetics of the 23 vacuum stations, canopy and vacuum equipment. Staff understands that this property is a car wash today and not an attractive one. But what we approve today is the image that we will likely see for the next 30-40 years. The City has had great success at the YMCA with a low four foot wall and ligustrum trees to screen the parking lot. The staff will suggest a similar design condition to address the aesthetics of this site. One other topic is the discussion of a long range future bike trail that may use a bike/pedestrian bridge over the FDOT railroad tressle. The car wash property owner has agreed to work with the City if an access easement is needed in that northern undeveloped triangle of the site to connect from the Orlando Avenue sidewalk to the railroad right-of-way. Comprehensive Plan Compatibility: The Comprehensive Plan discourages car oriented businesses in most sections of the City including prohibiting new car sales, car repair, car washes, etc. The exception is this northwest quadrant due to the Holler Hyundai, former Holler Dodge, Volvo Store, (Peacock Ford), etc. The property is already a car wash but the Comprehensive Plan also concurs on the location for this new facility. Staff Recommendation is for Approval with the following conditions:
1. That the final storm water design not intrude upon the front 10 foot setback allowing sufficient land to be used for the oak tree screening.
2. That the project include a four foot tall precast wall screening the vacuum stations with ligustrum trees (8-10 feet in height) on the exterior facing Orlando Avenue, as well as overall compliance with the landscape code and removal of invasive trees along the railroad right-of-way.
3. That the property owner work with the City to provide an easement if a future pedestrian bike trail project is proposed.
Courtesy Rick Singh, CFA, Orange County Property Appraiser
Created: 2/18/2019 10:58 Aerial 2018 This map is for reference only and is not a survey
Proposed Car Wash
RAINDANCER CAR WASH1350 N Orlando Avenue, Winter Park, FL 32789
Proposed Car Wash
RAINDANCER CAR WASH1350 N Orlando Avenue, Winter Park, FL 32789
Co
ns
ultin
g E
ng
in
ee
r
Jo
b A
18
23
Sta
rt 0
5.0
1.2
01
8
Bill B
ryan
C
ar W
ash
Ow
ner: B
ill B
ryan
Proposed C
ar W
ash:
1350 N
O
rlando A
venue, W
inter P
ark, FL 32789
L1.1
Orla
nd
o A
lo
ns
o J
r.
Flo
rid
a R
eg
is
tra
tio
n A
R 1
41
38
NO
T F
OR
P
ER
MIT
U
NL
ES
S
SIG
NE
D S
EA
LE
D &
D
AT
ED
AA
26
00
11
81
12
35
C
ora
l W
ay
, S
uite
1
01
, M
ia
mi, F
L , 3
31
45
3
05
5
95
3
09
5 o
a-a
rc
h.c
om
PROPOSED
CAR WASH
3,969 S.F.
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
CAR
WASH
EXIT
N
O
R
T
H
O
R
L
A
N
D
O
A
V
E
N
U
E
30'-0"
REAR SETBACK
1
5
'
-
0
"
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
30'-0"
REAR SETBACK
1
5
'
-
0
"
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'30' 60' 80'
10'-0"
RAILROAD EASEMENT
10'-0"
RAILROAD EASEMENT
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
SYMBOL USED ON PLAN PLANT NAME NATIVE
SPECIES
CALIPER HEIGHT CANOPY
DIAMETER
QUANTITY
Co
ns
ultin
g E
ng
in
ee
r
Jo
b A
18
23
Sta
rt 0
5.0
1.2
01
8
Bill B
ryan
C
ar W
ash
Ow
ner: B
ill B
ryan
Proposed C
ar W
ash:
1350 N
O
rlando A
venue, W
inter P
ark, FL 32789
SP1.1
Orla
nd
o A
lo
ns
o J
r.
Flo
rid
a R
eg
is
tra
tio
n A
R 1
41
38
NO
T F
OR
P
ER
MIT
U
NL
ES
S
SIG
NE
D S
EA
LE
D &
D
AT
ED
AA
26
00
11
81
12
35
C
ora
l W
ay
, S
uite
1
01
, M
ia
mi, F
L , 3
31
45
3
05
5
95
3
09
5 o
a-a
rc
h.c
om
PROPOSED
CAR WASH
3,969 S.F.
4
10
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
138'-11"
STACKING
DISTANCE
CAR
WASH
EXIT
N
O
R
T
H
O
R
L
A
N
D
O
A
V
E
N
U
E
30'-0"
REAR SETBACK
1
5
'
-
0
"
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
30'-0"
REAR SETBACK
1
5
'
-
0
"
F
R
O
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
0' 10' 20' 40'30' 60' 80'
10'-0"
RAILROAD EASEMENT
10'-0"
RAILROAD EASEMENT
4
3
9
Co
ns
ultin
g E
ng
in
ee
r
Jo
b A
18
23
Sta
rt 0
5.0
1.2
01
8
Bill B
ryan
C
ar W
ash
Ow
ner: B
ill B
ryan
Proposed C
ar W
ash:
1350 N
O
rlando A
venue, W
inter P
ark, FL 32789
SP2.1
Orla
nd
o A
lo
ns
o J
r.
Flo
rid
a R
eg
is
tra
tio
n A
R 1
41
38
NO
T F
OR
P
ER
MIT
U
NL
ES
S
SIG
NE
D S
EA
LE
D &
D
AT
ED
AA
26
00
11
81
12
35
C
ora
l W
ay
, S
uite
1
01
, M
ia
mi, F
L , 3
31
45
3
05
5
95
3
09
5 o
a-a
rc
h.c
om
PROPOSED SITE SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED SITE WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED SITE NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
PROPOSED SITE EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
