city of phoenix employees’ retirement system via city charter ... administration ... average...
TRANSCRIPT
City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement
System
February 22, 2011
2
Topics
Plan History and Participants Governance and Structure Plan Provisions Contributions and Funded Ratio Investment Allocation and Performance
3
Plan History
Defined Benefit Plan
Established via City Charter
Initiated in 1947; revised in 1953
Periodic changes approved by voters
Qualified under the Internal Revenue Code
Includes classified civil service employees and full-time appointed employees, except public safety employees and elected officials
4
Current Plan Participantsas of June 30, 2010
Retirees5,029
Members9,603
5
Plan History - Participants
6,144
7,364
8,758
9,95010,324
1,0811,602
2,1532,603
3,171
3,968 4,133 4,2894,497
4,7635,029
9,60310,06510,408
7,716
5,776
9,659
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Retirees Members
6
Plan History
Excludes Police Officers & Firefighters
Included in Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) authorized by Legislature
COPERS’ staff supports the public safety employees, PSPRS Phoenix Fire and Police Pension Boards
Excludes elected officials
Included in Elected Officials Retirement Plan (EORP) authorized by Legislature
7
Police & Fire Pension Participants(as of June 30, 2010)
868
1,753
12
244128 198
1,472
3,017
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Retirees & Beneficiaries Inactive Vested DROP Employees
Fire Police
8
COPERS’ Governance Retirement Board
Per City Charter is responsible for Plan: Administration Management Operation
Nine Board members Three employee members elected by membership Four ex-officio: Finance Director, City Treasurer,
Human Resources Director and City Manager (or designee)
Citizen member Retiree member
9
Board Committee Structure
Retirement Board
Investment Committee
Charter Amendments/Policies & Procedures Committee
Legal Review Committee
Disability Assessment Committee
Ad Hoc Committees (as necessary)
10
Board Support Staff
Retirement Administrator and 13 staff members Administrative Operations Investments Member Services
Consultants / Advisors Investment Consultant Investment Managers Custodian Bank Legal Counsel Actuary Internal and External Auditors
11
COPERS Plan Provisions –Retirement Eligibility
Active Employee
Age 60 with 10 or more years of service
Age 62 with 5* or more years of service
Rule of 80: age plus credited service equal 80
Deferred Vested 5* or more years of
credited service upon reaching age 62 – must leave contributions in fund
*Vesting period = Five years
12
Benefit Formula Components
Final Average Salary (FAS)
Credited Service
Benefit Ratio
Up to 32.5 years @ 2%
32.5 to 35.5 years @ 1%
Over 35.5 years @ 0.5%
13
Final Average Salary (FAS)
Average of highest 36 consecutive months of retirement applicable earnings within the last 10 years
14
Credited Service Actual time worked in a retirement applicable
position
Service transferred from ASRS / PSPRS
Service time purchased:
Other public retirement system service
Military service (up to 5 years)
Eligible prior City of Phoenix employment
Sick leave conversion (if eligible)
15
Benefit Formula Straight Life Pension amount is calculated as:
(FAS) X (Credited Service) X (Benefit Ratio)
Example:
Monthly FAS is $3,500
Credited Service of 25 years
$3,500 X 25 X 2% = $1,750 monthly pension
There are six payment options, some include survivor provisions
16
Possible Pension IncreasesPension Equalization Program (PEP)
Approved by voters in 1991
Permanent increase (but not a COLA)
Eligible if retired 36 months by January 1st
Lesser of prior year’s CPI (not less than zero) or percentage supported by excess returns reserve
Based on excess investment returns (5-year average over 8%)
17
Possible Pension Increases13th Check
Approved by voters in 1983 One time payment Eligible if retired by June 30th of payment year Paid with December pension payment Lesser of ½ of prior year’s CPI increase or 3%;
minimum of 1%; if excess returns reserve balance sufficient
Based on excess investment returns (5-year average over 8%)
18
PEP
11.40%12.31%
8.64%
13.11%
11.40%
13.70%
11.70%
2.60%
5.00%
8.50%8.30%
12.25%
4.80%
4.90%
12.59%
16.30%
13.10%
2.25%
2.92%
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
1992 19931994 1995 1996 1997 19981999 2000 2001 2002 20032004 2005 2006 2007 20082009 20100.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
Equalization Reserve Balance Average Rate of return (5 cal year)
Actuarial Return Target = 8%
19
Pension Equalization Program(payable in April)
3.8%3.9%
2.1% 2.1%
1.8%
2.9%
2.0%
3.4%
1.7%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
'01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
10 year Average: 2.4%
0.0%
20
13th Check(payable in December)
0.0%
1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.05%
1.00%1.00%1.00%
0.00%
0.30%
0.60%
0.90%
1.20%
1.50%
'01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
21
Membership Statisticsas of June 30, 2010
Average annual pension:$28,042
Average annual compensation for active members:
$61,845 Average age of active members:
45.7 Average years of service of active members:
12.4
22
Contributions
Employee 5% of gross salary Pre-tax deduction Since 1/1/1985
Employer Actuarially determined each year 14.35% fiscal year 2009 - 2010 16.04% fiscal year 2010 - 2011 18.18% fiscal year 2011 - 2012
23
History of Employer ContributionsPercent of Payroll
18.18%
16.04%*
14.35%
11.78%
12.12%
9.17%
7.24%6.13%
7.67%9.14%6.86%
11.66%11.20%
9.97%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
20.00%
98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12Fi sc a l Ye a r
Employee Contribution 5% per Charter
*Included 1.77% increase due to outcome of actuarial audit
24
Contribution Trends
Very level as a percentage of payroll over 30+ years prior to 2002
Prior to 2002, favorable investment experience offset effect of negative experience in other areas
25
Contribution Trends
Significant increases since 2002 reflect the negative investment experience
Increases in 2008 also reflects method adjustments pursuant to actuarial audit recommendations
Funding value of assets smoothes differences between actual and assumed experience (8%)
26
Funded Ratio
69.30%
75.30%79.10%
83.90%81.30%84.20%84.20%88.50%
91.60%
102.50%101.70%101.70%100.10%
95.90%
84.70%
73.30%
87.80%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Aggregate 2009 Funding level for public funds: 79.8% *
* Source: National Association of State Retirement Administrators, Public Funds Survey
27
Target Asset Allocation
Int'l Equity21%
US Equity25%
Long/Short Equity10%Real Return
10%
Real Estate15%
Fixed Income19%
28
Investment Performanceas of June 30, 2010
3.6%3.2%-3.5%14.2%
RVK All Pension Plans $1B – 5B median
1.8%1.0%-6.3%8.6%Target Benchmark
2.4%1.1%-5.9%10.3%COPERS
10 years5 years 3 years1 year
Annualized for periods greater than one year.
Thank you!