city of miami - official websiteegov.ci.miami.fl.us/legistarweb/attachments/56903.pdfdec 17, 2009...

1

City of Miami

Response to

Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Objections, Recommendations

and Comments (ORC) Report, DCA No.10-RWSP1. Addressing the Application to

Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP)

Dated: December 17, 2009

This report contains responses by the City of Miami to the objections referenced in the

Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report issued by the Florida

Department of Community Affairs (DCA) dated February 19, 2010. The DCA issued

objections and comments to the Application transmitted for review by the City of Miami

on December 17, 2009. The objections must be addressed since they form the basis of

potential determinations of compliance by DCA. The DCA objections and corresponding

recommendations are summarized below, followed by the City’s responses.

A. DCA Objections to proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan:

1. Intergovernmental Corrdination Policies IC-1.1.7, IC-1.1.8, IC-1.1.9, and IC-2.1.1, and

Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.3 lack specific, on-going coordination mechanisms and

specific programs for periodic sharing of information to ensure the the County and the

City properly monitor and plan for the City’s future water supply needs.

Citations: 163.3167(13), 163.3177(4)(a),(6)(a, c, d, h), (9), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.003(90),9J-

5.005(6), 9J-5.015(3)(b)1, 2, 3, (c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.

DCA Recommendation: The City should revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policies IC-1.1.7, IC-1.1.8, IC-1.1.9,

and IC-2.1.1, and Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.3 to ensure a meaningful process for

collaborative planning and intergovernmental coordination through specific coordination

mechanisms, on a continuing and ongoing basis, on water supply issues between the City and

the County, to include the following:

i. Share information regarding changes in land-use, population and demand projections,

water supply needs, implementing alternative water supply projects (including reuse and

other conservation measures), establishing level of service standards, and serving newly

annexed areas.

ii. Describe the City’s participation in the County’s concurrency tracking program for

water supply.

iii. Provide information regarding alternative water supply projects that will directly provide

water supply for the City. The current alternative water supply project is the Hialeah-

Preston Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion. The updated schedule,

description of the project, and coordination efforts between the City and the County

concerning the project should be included in the City’s Work Plan.

iv. Revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC-1.1.7 to clarify that the City cannot

direct the SFWMD to comply with City policy in its water planning efforts. Instead, the

policy should focus on collaborative planning and intergovernmental coordination.

2

City Response: i. City of Miami proposes to include additional language to the following Policy PW-1.2.4

to transmit information with the MDWASD to ensure collaborative planning efforts:

Policy PW-1.2.4: The City will continue to coordinate with through the Planners Technical Committee and the Miami-Dade County on annual bases to utilize, expand and pursue the development of new potable water wellfields and alternative water supplies to meet the City’s existing and future water supply needs. Such coordination efforts will include the transmittal of information for large-scale future land use changes, population and demand projections, water supply needs, implementation of alternative water supply projects, establishment of level of service standards, and servicing of newly annexed areas.

ii. MDWASD is currently developing a Water Supply Allocation Program to address

adequate water supply requirements in Florida Statute and ensure compliance with the

County’s water use permit. Policy PW-1.2.3 will incorporate additional language to better

describe the City’s participation in the County’s Water Allocation Program.

Policy PW-1.2.3: The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible with Miami-Dade County to maintain procedures and programs to monitor levels of service of each water supply, water treatment and wastewater treatment facility for use by agencies that issue development orders or permits. Such procedures may include the establishment of water and wastewater allocation processes to assure that adequate water supply, and water and wastewater transmission and treatment capacity is available prior to issuance of development orders or permits pursuant to Chapter 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.

iii. The City of Miami and MDWASD believes Policy PW-1.3.1 identifies the most current

alternative water supply projects. The Policy further references Appendix A (page 22) of

the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies specific projects names,

descriptions, construction timeframes and estimated costs.

Note: The County has requested a permit modification to the Water Use Permit but at this

time has not been issued by the South Florida Water Management District. Please see

Appendix WSP-1 – Application for Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-00017-W

(Exhibit 29 and 30).

iv. The City of Miami proposes to revise Policy IC-1.1.7 to clarify the City’s efforts to

coordinate with the SFWMD planning and permitting process.

Policy IC-1.1.7: It is the policy of the City thatThe City shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall recognize to accommodate its water supply and management planning and permitting process, the City’s adopted population projections, spatial characteristics of the MCNP Land Use Plan map, and policies of the MCNP Land Use, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Coastal Management Elements. It is further City policy to accommodate future population and economic growth by utilizing the range of alternative water supply technologies outlined under MCNP Potable Water Element Objective PW-1.2, including sources from expanded and/or new Florida Aquifer wellfields, Floridian Aquifer storage and recover (ASR) techniques, water

3

conservation methods, water reclamation, water and wastewater reuse and other advanced technologies.

2. Capital Improvments Element (CIE) Policy CI-1.2.2 is inconsistent with the requirmewnt

in Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., that sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water

supplies, and potable water facilities must be available no later than the issuance by the

local government of certificante of occupancy.

Citations: 163.3177(3), (6)(a), (6)(c), and 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(3),

(90),9J-5.006(3)(b)1, (3)(c)3, 9J-5.016(3)(b)3, and (3)(c)6, F.A.C.

DCA Recommendation: Revise CIE Policy CI-1.2.2 to clarify that the sentence which states “Such development

orders may be granted, however, if capital improvements…are programmed to begin within

one year…”does not apply to sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water supplies,

and potable water facilities, consistent with Chapter 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.:

City Response: City of Miami proposes to add additional language to the following Policy CI-1.2.2 to be

consistent with requirement in Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.: Policy CI-1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use will be contingent upon the ability of existing or programmed public facilities to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard for the public facilities listed in Policy CI-1.2.3. Such development orders may be granted, however, if capital improvements which would eliminate any resulting service deficiency are programmed to begin within one year and are included in the current Capital Budget. The public facilities to serve the new development or redevelopment shall be in place and available to serve new development as follows:

a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water facilities and adequate water supply shall

be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The concurrency requirement for sanitary sewer may be met through the use of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department of Health. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the city shall consult with the Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to determine whether the adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. Furthermore, MDWASD shall be responsible for monitoring the availability of water supplies for all water users of MDWASD and for implementing a system that links water supplies to the permitting of new development.

3. The City has not included specific measureable objectives and policies with meaningful

and predictable standards for water conservation.

Citations: 163.3167(13), 163.3177(1), (3), (4)(a),(6)(a, c, d),(8), (9),(10)(e), 163.3180(2)(a),

F.S., and Rule 9J-5.003(82), (90),9J-5.005(1)(c), (2), (2)(b)2, (2)(c)1, 9J-5.015(3)(b)1, 3,

(3)(c)1, 9J-5.016(3)(b)1, 3, 4, 5, (3)(c)6, 8, (4), F.A.C.

4

DCA Recommendation: The City should provide specific and measurable objectives and policies for achieving goals

for water conservation related to the Miami-Dade County Code by doing the following:

a. Amend the text of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) at page 10, section

3.6.1 to note the following: 1.) All future development within the City will comply with

water use efficiency techniques for indoor water use in accordance with section 8-31, 32-

84, and 8A-381 of the Miami-Dade County Code; and 2.) All future development will

comply with the landscape standards in sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami-Dade

County Code.

b. Amend Policies NR-2.1.8 and NR-2.1.9 to note that the City shall comply with water

conservation measures in sections 8-31, 32-84, and 8A-381 and with the landscape

standards in sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami-Dade County Code.

City Response: City of Miami proposes to amend text of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan on page 10

section 3.6.1 and Policies NR-2.1.8 and NR-2.1.9 to include the following language:

Water Conservation Plans and Development Codes Miami-Dade County has developed recommendations for new development that would achieve higher water use savings than currently required by code. The Board of County Commissioners adopted the Water Use Efficiency Ordinance 08-14 which created Section 8-31 of the Code of Miami-Dade County on February 5, 2008, and amended by ordinance on September 2, 2008. In addition, the Landscape Ordinance, creating Chapter 18A and 18B of the Miami-Dade Code of Ordinances was adopted by the BCC on May 5, 2009. These water efficiency recommendations represent an additional 30 percent to the water savings identified in the 20-year Water Use Efficiency Plan. All applicants will be required to comply with these future code requirementsfuture development within the City will be required to comply with water conservations measures as provided through Chapter 8 – Building Code, Chapter 32 – Water and Sewer Regulations, and Chapter 18A and 18B – Landscape Ordinance, of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. The list of recommendations submitted to the BCC and the ordinance relating to water use efficiency standard are presented in Appendix D of the MDWASD Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and are also posted in the Miami-Dade Water Conservation Portal. Policy NR-2.1.8: [Reserved] The City will continue to practice water conservations measures (i.e. new residential and commercial development will be required to install high efficiency plumbing fixtures and appliances) that are enforced through Chapter 8 – Building Code and 32 – Water and Sewer Regulations , Building Code, Section 31 of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances, updated September 2, 2008.

Policy NR-2.1.9: The City will continue to implement the same or more stringent water conservation measures as provided through Chapter 8 – Building Code (updated September 2, 2008), Chapter 32 – Water and Sewer Regulations (updated September 2, 2008), and Chapter 18A and 18B – Landscape Ordinance (updated May 5, 2009), of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances.

5

4. The population projections within the WSFWP are inconsistent with the County’s adopted

WSFWP and the Shimberg Center. Furthermore, the projections are derived from a data

source which is 5 to 6 years old and therefore is not based on best available data.

Citations: 163.3177(1), (2), (6)(a), (h)2, (8), (10)(e), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.003(107), (116),9J-

5.005(1)(c), (2), (5)(a), 9J-5.006(1)(g), 9J-5.015(3)(b)1, 2, (3)(c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.

DCA Recommendation: The City should coordinate with the County to adopt a consistent population projection.

City Response: The City of Miami has coordinated with Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department

to adopt the most resent 2008 TAZ population projections. Section 3.1, Table A and Table B

of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan will be revised to reflect the following:

3.1 Population Information The City’s existing and future population figures as shown in Table A are derived from 2004 2008 Miami-Dade County Planning and Zoning Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ), 2005 BEBR (Shimberg Center of Affordable Housing Bureau of Economic and Business Research) and are consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan. Between 1990 and 2000, the City of Miami population grew from 358,548 to 362,470, an increase of one percent (1.1%)1. Although the City’s 2005 Evaluation Appraisal Report (EAR) predicted an increase in population, in 2005 it was estimated that the City’s population had increased to 386,8792 residents. By 2010, the City’s population is anticipated to increase to 405,341401,2873; 2015 to 412,674431,505; and 2025 to 449,960491,941 (represents an increase of four seven percent over the 2005 2008 population). By all projections, growth will continue to occur in the region, with future development potential and population growth limited by the scarcity of vacant and developable land.

Table A. City of Miami

Population Projection Comparisons

YEAR 2005 BEBR4 MDP&Z

2004 2008 TAZ

20052008 386,879 404,266389,200

2010 405,341 418,508401,287

2015 421,674 442,246431,505

2020 437,213 468,507461,723

2025 449,960 494,769491,941

2030 461,306 521,030522,159

1 Population projections provided by Miami-Dade County Facts, Miami-Dade Department of Planning & Zoning, May 2004 2 Population projections provided by Shimberg Center of Affordable Housing, Bureau of Economic Business Research (BEBR)2005 3 Population projections provided by Miami-Dade Department of Planning and Zoning Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) 20042008

6

Table B. Existing and Projected Potable Water Demand for the City of Miami

WATER SUPPLY UTILITY SERVICE WITHIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT’S JURISDICTION

Million Gallons/day (MGD)

Year Population Projections

Gallons/Capita/Day

Average Demand (MGD)

MDWASD System Demand

Demand as % of County

MDC Alexander Orr Plant Capacity

(MGD)

MDC Hialeah-Preston

Plant Capacity

(MGD)

20052008 386,879389,200 155 59.9760.33 348.90 17 248214.74 225

2010 405,341401,287 155 62.8362.20 354.96 18 248214.74 225

2015 421,674431,505 155 65.3666.88 378.02 1718 248214.74 225

2020 437,213461,723 155 67.7771.57 396.80 1718 248214.74 225

2025 449,960491,941 155 69.7476.25 416.64 1718 248214.74 225

2030 461,306522,159 155 71.5080.93 434.63 1619 248214.74 225

B. DCA Comments to proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan:

1. Table B, Existing and Projected Potable Water Demand – Table B lists the capacity of the

Alexander Orr water treatment plant at 248 MGD. This figure is derived from the County’s

WSFWP at page 3 -14. However, it represents the plant’s installed capacity of 248 MGD,

and should be replaced with its rated capacity of 214.74 MGD.

City Response: City of Miami proposes to amend Table B of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan to reflect

the rated capacity of 214.74 MGD for the Alexander Orr water treatment plant (See OCR

A.4. Response).

2. Population – Page 7 refers to the 2015 population as 412,674 persons. Table A refers to the

2015 population as 421,674 persons. The typographical error should be corrected.

City Response: The City of Miami has coordinated with Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department

to adopt the most current 2008 TAZ population projections. These population figures will be

reflective on page 7 of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (See OCR A.4. Response).

7

3. Reference to Miami-Dade Capital Improvement Schedule – Page 12, Section 4.1 and 4.2

both refer to the Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Miami-Dade County capital improvement

schedule. The references should be updated to refer to the Fiscal Year 2009-10 capital

improvement schedule.

City Response: City of Miami proposes to amend Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the Water Supply Facilities Work

Plan to be consistent with the County’s most recent Capital Improvement Schedule. Please

see Appendix WSP-2 containing the most resent Sewer Facilities (Table 8) and Water

Facilities (Table 12) of the MDCDMP:

4.1 Alternative Water Supply Projects Proposed alternative water supply (AWS) projects are to meet MDWASD’s increase water demands through 2030, which encompasses the proposed 20-year Consumptive Use Permit period. AWS projects have been identified to meet water demands in the MDWASD service area and may be found in the 2007/20082009/2010 Miami-Dade County Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table 8 and 12 of Appendix A), the 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and Alternative Water Supply and Wastewater Reuse Projects Table (Table 1 of Appendix A).

4.2 Capital Improvements Element/Schedule As demonstrated in the previous sections, the Alternative Water Supply Plan being proposed by the County should meet the increased water demands through 2030. As a confirmation that the County is committed to fund these projects, the projects for the 20-Year Work Plan may be found in the 2007/20082009/2010 Miami-Dade County Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table 8 and 12 of Appendix A) and with the 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.

4. Timing of Concurrency Requirement – Page 4, bullet 3 of the City’s WSFWP is

inconsistent with Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S. It incorrectly states that “…This water

supply concurrency is now in effect, and local governments should be complying with the

requirement for all new development proposals. In addition, local regulations as soon as

possible to address these statutory requirements. The latest point at which the

comprehensive plan must be revised to reflect the concurrency requirements is at the time

the local government adopts plan amendments to implement the recommendations of the

Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR).”The underline text should be deleted.

City Response: City of Miami proposes to amend Section 1.2, bullet 3 of the Water Supply Facilities Work

Plan to be consistent with Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.:

3. Ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities area available to serve new development

no later than the date on which the local government anticipates issuing a certificate of occupancy and consult with the applicable water supplier prior to approving building permit, to determine whether adequate water supplies will be available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance date of the certificate of occupancy [s.163.3180 (2)(a), F.S., effective July 1, 2005]. This “water supply concurrency” is now in effect, and local governments should be complying with the requirement for all new development proposals. In addition, local governments should update their comprehensive plans and land

8

development regulations as soon as possible to address these statutory requirements. The latest point at which the comprehensive plan must be revised to reflect the concurrency requirements is at the time the local government adopts plan amendments to implement the recommendations of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR).

WSP-ORC APPENDIX

March 2010

APPENDIX WSP-1

The following data represents the Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department Application for Modification of

the current Water Use Permit No.13-00017-W.

This space was intentionally left blank.

Water & Sewer P.O. Box 33031 6 3071 SW 38th Avenue

Miami, Florida 33233-031 6 T 305-665-7471

Electronic Correspondence1 Original via Certified Maill Return Receipt Requested 70010360000067841048 CCN: 53645 File No. 8DC.18.56

Carlos Alvarez, Mayor

December 21,2009

Ms. Terrie Bates Assistant Deputy Director Regulatory and Public Affairs South Florida Water Management District P.O. Box 24680 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 Email: tbate~~sfwmd.qov

RE: Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) - Application for Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-0001 7-W

Dear Ms. Bates:

As requested in your letter dated October 6, 2009, which addressed earlier discussions on making modifications to the existing water use permit, enclosed is a completed application form and check number 00418530 in the amount of $11,500.00 for processing the proposed modifications.

The proposed modifications are based on current water use reduction, as a result of a very successful implementation of our Water Conservation Plan and water use restrictions, which are now permanent by county wide ordinance. The County's finished water demand is now 35 million gallons per day (MGD) lower than what was anticipated when the 20-year water use permit application was submitted, and this has eliminated the anticipated water demand crisis that was the basis for the very ambitious schedule for several near-term projects. In addition, the adoption of legislation in 2008 requiring phase-out of our ocean outfalls has serious implications for our water reclamation and reuse plans that were not contemplated when the water use permit was developed. As part of those plans we contemplate taking an agreement with Florida Power and Light for reuse of up to 90 million gallons per day of reclaimed water at their Turkey Point complex to the County Commission early next year.

The proposed modifications include the following:

eliminating blending of native Floridan aquifer well water with existing and proposed sources due to water quality issues and using the existing Floridan Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) facilities to reduce dry season pumpage fr originally intended; deferring the implementation of the North and Central District Wastewater Treatment Plants' reuse projects to the compliance date in the Ocean Outfall legislation, adopted in 2008, to facilitate a comprehensive and cost-effective reuse plan that is completely integrated with the Outfall compliance plan; and

L09191SFWMD

Ms. Terrie Bates, SFWMD Page 2 December 21,2009

Application for Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-0001 7-W

delaying the timelines for the Hialeah Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant and Floridan Aquifer wellfield and South District recharge projects, by one year in light of reduced water demands and to provide sufficient time to complete these projects in an orderly and cost-effective way.

Should you have any questions regarding this application, please contact me at 786-552-8086, or Ms. Bertha Goldenberg, P.E. at 786-552-8120. We look forward to working closely with the District to meet Miami-Dade County's water supply needs as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible while contributing directly to enhancement of natural systems.

Sincerely,

k l ~ ~ * Joh W. Renfrow, P.E. Director

Enclosures: Check Number 0041 8530 in the Amount of $1 1,500.00 Completed Water Use Permit Application Form 0645-W01

ec: C. Wehle [email protected] R. Diaz [email protected] M. Elsner [email protected] J. Marshall [email protected] B. Tilles btilIe~~sfwmd.qov K. Smith kar~mith~sfwmd.qov

MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT POOLED CASH ACCOUNT

P.O. BOX 3303 16 MIAMI, FL 33233-03 16

Check Date: 10/06/2009 Vendor Name: SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MGMT DISTRICT Check Number: 00418530 Payment Deductions

Invoice Number Invoice Date Voucher ID Gross Amount Insp Gen Fee User Access Fee Discount Paid Amount

PERMlT 92909 09/29/2009 DP34970 1 1500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1,500.00

Processing Fee ($1 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 ) for Application for Major Modification to Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department Water Use Permit 13-0001 7-W

The attached check represents the amount due you as shown on our records. For additional information. contact (305) 665-7471 . ,

Total Total Total Total Total Check Number Date Gross Amount Insp Gen Fee User Aceess Fee Discount Paid Amount

Form 0645-W01 (08/03) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use 1

WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (RC-1A, RC-1W, RC-1G) For all water uses EXCEPT dewatering for mining or construction

General and Specific Authority, Chapter 373, State Statutes, 40E-20 Florida Administrative Code

and Basis of Review, Vol III, South Florida Water Management District. A. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Name of Owner, Responsible Entity, etc. Name: John W. Renfrow Project Name: Modification of Permit 13-00037-W Address: P.O. Box 330316 City: Miami County: Miami-Dade State: FL ZIP: 33233-0316 Phone: 786-552-8086 Cell Phone: 305-283-5616 Fax: E-mail: [email protected] 2. Proof of Ownership is required, in the form of a Deed, tax certificate, lease, or Articles of Incorporation ATTACH Proof of Ownership to this Form – Previously Submitted 3. Name of Engineer, Contractor or Other. Name: Bertha M. Goldenberg Firm: Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department Address: P.O. Box 330316 City: Miami County: Miami-Dade State: FL ZIP: 33233-0316 Phone: 786-552-8120 Cell Phone: 305-903-9807 Fax: 786-552-8120 E-mail: [email protected]

4. If the above person(s) filling out this form will sign this Application on behalf of the owner, a letter of authorization signed by the owner, stating they are acting on behalf of the owner, must be submitted.

ATTACH Letter of Authorization to this form – Not Applicable

5. Is this a New Permit Renewal/Modification/Expired Permit No.: 13-00037-W

6. Amount of water applied for: gallons per day – Previously Submitted not to be changed

7. Has a Surface Water Management Permit or Environmental Resource Permit from the District been issued for this Project? SWM / ERP Permit No.:

or has a Surface Water Management Permit or Environmental Resource Permit from the District been applied for? SWM / ERP Application No.:

8. A fee of $11,500 is required to process this Application. See Chapter 40E-1.607, F.A.C. for fee schedule.

ATTACH Application fee to this Form – Check Number 00418530 in the Amount of $11,500.00

9. Please Identify any District Staff member you have discussed this Application with: Ms. Terrie Bates, Ms. Karen Smith

B. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY – Previously Submitted

1. General Location of the Property/Project – Previously Submitted

County: Miami-Dade City: Miami Sections – Previously Submitted Township (s) Range (s) (or Land Grant Name) – Previously Submitted

2. It will be necessary to submit two drawings to be used as exhibits for this Permit.

a. Location Map, (81/2 x 11), showing location of the project in relation to major roads. b. Site Map, (81/2 x 11) locating project in relation to adjacent streets, canals and water bodies, and

showing property boundaries, buildings, on-site lakes/ponds and the location of pumps and wells.

ATTACH Location Map and Site Map to this Form – Previously Submitted

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT


C. WATER SOURCE and WATER USE TYPE Please indicate the source of water.

Groundwater from an underground aquifer:

Aquifer Name (if known): Biscayne and Floridan Aquifers

ATTACH Table A for Wells to this form

Previously Submitted

Surface water:

Onsite Lake/Pond Onsite Ditch/Canal

Adjacent Lake/Open Water, Name:

Adjacent Canal, Name:

ATTACH Table B for Pumps to this Form

No Change Proposed

Type of water use (Please check at least one)

Agricultural Irrigation Landscape Irrigation Golf Course Irrigation

Public Water Supply Industrial/Commercial Aquaculture

Aquifer Storage/Recovery (ASR) Other (Please describe): D. IRRIGATION WATER USE Not Applicable

1. Is this permit for irrigation? Landscape Golf Agriculture Crop type: What is the Total Project Acreage: Irrigated Acreage:

ATTACH Table D for Crop Information to this Form Not Applicable 2. Applications for golf or landscape irrigation in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water conservation

plan as explained in Section 2.3.1 of the Basis of Review.

ATTACH, if needed, a water conservation plan for golf or landscape irrigation Not Applicable

E. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WATER USE

1. Is this permit for Public Water Supply? Yes

Maximum gallons per month needed: 13,364 MG Average gallons per day: 418.47 MGD (End of Permit)

Permit Duration requested: 18 Years (remaining amount of time in current 20 Year Permit to expiration)

2. A map of the service area for the utility, (81/2 x 11) showing boundaries of service, water treatment plants, storage facilities, the location of all production and monitor wells is required.

ATTACH Location Map and Service Area Map to this Form Previously Submitted

3. For public water supplies using more than 100,000 gallons per day, applicants must meet criteria and identify the demand for each use/component including number, type and size of service connections; past pumpage, projected population data, future expected pumpage, water treatment method and losses and other specific data as identified in Section 2.1 and 2.6 of the Basis of Review. Tables F (past water use),Table G (projected water use) and Table I (treatment method and losses) must be submitted.

ATTACH water supply demand computations and Tables F, G and I to this Form – Updated Tables F and G Attached

4. For public water supplies using more than 100,000 gallons per day, other necessary information requirements may include if applicable: explanations of per-capita greater than 200 GPD, water supply system interconnections, water received from or distributed to other entities, and aquifer storage and recovery. Please submit Tables H (for per capita use greater than 200 GPD), Table J (ASR), Table K (interconnections), and Table E (water received from or distributed to other entities) if necessary.

ATTACH, if needed, Tables H, J, K and E to this Form 5. Applications for public water supply in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water conservation plan as

explained in Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review.

ATTACH, if needed, a water conservation plan for public water supply to this Form Previously Submitted


F. INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND OTHER WATER USES - Not Applicable

1. Is this permit for Industrial/Commercial? Nature of the Business:

Maximum gallons per month needed:

Average gallons per day needed:

2. Industrial/commercial applicants using more than 100,000 gallons per day must provide information on the water balance for the operation, including all sources of water and losses of water for processes, personal/sanitary needs, treatment losses and unaccounted uses. A flow chart for the water balance should be submitted.

ATTACH water balance and flow chart to this Form – Not Applicable

3. For uses other than Irrigation, Public Water Supply, Industrial or Commercial, but excluding mining/dewatering (Air conditioning, pool heating, mitigation, etc.):

Describe Water Needs:

Maximum gallons per month needed:

Average gallons per day needed:

ATTACH a written explanation and calculations used to determine the amount of water you need – Not Applicable 4. Applications for industrial, commercial and other water uses in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water

conservation plan as explained in Section 2.4.1 of the Basis of Review.

ATTACH, if needed, a water conservation plan for industrial, commercial or other water supply – Not Applicable

G. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IF YOU ARE USING MORE THAN 100,000 GALLONS PER DAY

1. The withdrawal of water must not cause harm to sensitive areas, wetlands or saline water intrusion. It may be necessary to supply modeling to address impacts of the water use.

ATTACH, if needed, modeling or documentation on environmental impacts to this Form – Previously Submitted 2. All applicants withdrawing water in proximity to saline surface or ground water, or withdrawing saline water that

may come in contact with fresh surface or ground water, are required to develop a saline water monitoring program as described in Section 4.2 of the Basis of Review.

ATTACH, if needed, a saline water monitoring program – Previously Submitted 3. Except for Public Water Supply, reclaimed water must be used when readily available, unless it is not

environmentally, technically or economically feasible to do so, as explained in Section 3.2.3 of the Basis of Review.

ATTACH, if needed, an evaluation of the feasibility of using reclaimed water and a letter from your local utility regarding their availability of reclaimed water to this Form – Previously Submitted 4. An aerial photograph of the entire project site is required.

ATTACH an aerial photograph– Previously Submitted 5. Section 4.1 of the Basis of Review requires all wells and pumps be equipped with a calibrated meter or other

acceptable water use accounting method.

ATTACH calibration reports of the water use accounting method for each well and pump – Previously Submitted

H. ATTACHMENTS

Please make sure you have included the following attachments with your Application:

Proof of Ownership Table A for Wells Letter of Authorization (where required) Table B for pumps

I7 Location Map IXj Application Fee - Check Number 00418530 in the Site Map Amount of $1 1,500.00

For Irrigation water use, also make sure you have included the following affachments: - Not Applicable

Table D for crop information Water conservation plan (if needed)

For Public Water Supply water use of more than 100,000 gallons per day, also make sure you have included the following attachments:

Table F for past water use Table I for treatment method and losses IXI Table G for projected water use IXI Table J for ASR well operations (if needed) (PROPOSED)

Table H for projected water use Table K for interconnections (if needed) greater than 200 gpcd (if needed) Table E for water received from or delivered Water conservation plan (if needed) to other entities (if needed) Service Area Map

For Industrial water use of more than 100,000 gallons per day, also make sure you have included the following affachments: - Not Applicable

Water balance and flow chart Water conservation plan (if needed)

For Commercial or other water use that is not irrigation, public water supply, or industrial, also make sure you have included the following attachments: - Not Applicable

1 Explanation of how you determined the amount of water you need Water conservation plan (if needed)

Affachments for additional special requirements

Saline Water Monitoring Plan Feasibility evaluation of reclaimed water use Aerial Photograph Letter from reclaimed water utility Modeling or documentation of impacts of water use Reports of calibration of water use accounting method for wells and pumps

I. CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the total project acreage listed above is owned or controlled by me and encompasses the project referenced in this permit application. In addition, I agree to provide entry to the project site for South Florida Water Management inspectors with proper identification or documents as required by law for the purpose of making analyses of the site. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such inspectors to monitor permitted work if a permit is granted. If I do not use the water for which this permit is issued within two years the permit may be revoked. If this application is not complete within 240 days, it may be denied pursuant to Rule 40E-1.603, Florida Administrative Code.

John W. Renfrow Director, Miami-Dade Water and Sewer De~artment

Form 0645-W01 (08103) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use

!.!.

!.

#* #*

#*#* !.

!.

$1

#*

NMB

FPL

CHI

DF-1

FKAA

ENP-100

WWF ASR MW

SWWF ASR MW

NDWWTP FA-3

SDWWTP FA-5

Proposed Hialeah RO well

SW 8TH ST

FL

OR

IDA

TP

KE

EX

T

NW

27T

HA

VE

SW

177T

HA

VE

BIS

CA

YN

EB

LVD

SR

82

6E

XT

I 195

CO

LLIN

SA

VE

WO

KEECHO

BEERD

SD

IXIE

HW

Y

SR

874

EXT

I75

EX

T

SW

CA

RD

SO

UN

DR

D

SR9

NKR

OM

EAVE

KR

OM

EA

VE

SR 878

SR 836 EXT

I95

EX

PY

NW 36TH ST

NW

2N

DA

VE

SW

27T

HA

VE

SW 392ND ST

ALT

ON

RD

CR

AN

DO

NB

LVD

BR

ICK

ELL

AVE

NE 79TH ST

NW 215TH ST

SR 836 EXPY

I95

EX

PY

I95

EX

PY

NK

RO

ME

AV

E

SR 826 EXT

CO

LLIN

SA

VE

I95

EX

PY

.0 2 4 6 8 10

Miles

Legend

#*existing FA well outside MDWASD network

!.existing MDWASD well

$1proposed MDWASD well

Highway

Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer Department3071 SW 38 AveMiami FL 33146

Figure 13. Floridan Aquifer Monitoring Network Designupdated 12/16/09

EXHIBIT 8L

WELL ID LOCATION LATITUDE LONGITUDEBORE HOLE DEPTH (ft) 2

CASING DEPTH (ft) 2

MONITORING INTERVAL (ft) 2

PRESSURE LEVEL MONITOR

FREQUENCY

WATER QUALITY MONITOR

FREQUENCY

DF-1 1 N. Krome Ave 25 54 35.831 80 28 06.935 1800 TZ516-620, 1140-

1230, 1700-1800ENP-100 1 Everglades National Park 25 22 57.096 80 36 10.71 1333 620 620-1333FKAA 1 Florida City 25 26 36 80 30 31 1500 1067 880-1353

FPL 1 FPL Property 25 21 01.416 80 24 28.204 2304 TZ1120-1330, 1535-1920, 2100-2304

NMB 1 NMB 25 56 58.44 80 12 54.909 1900 1020NDWWTP FA-3N NDWWTP 25 55 05.037 80 08 49.465 1510 1410 1410-1510 Continuous Monthly

SDWWTP FA-5 SDWWTP 25 33 04.976 80 20 49.073 1890 DZ1490-1588, 1790-

1890 Continuous Monthly

ASR MW-1 WWF 25 42 01.374 80 28 29.193 1396 DZ855-1010, 1350-


SWWF MW-1 SWWF 25 69 80 39 1200 DZ845-900, 1110-


CHI Monitoring Well 3 Currently Constructing Well 1900 DZ1000 - 1100, 1400-

1500, Continuous MonthlyHialeah RO New Hialeah RO WTP Continuous Monthly

Highlighted wells proposed for MDWASD Floridan Aquifer monitoring network1. Data for Wells from DBHydro, wells not in MDWASD network.2. Feet Below Land Surface (bls)3. Currently Drilling CHI Monitoring Well, iInformation provided is Proposed only.TZ - tri-zone DZ - dual zone

EXHIB

IT 9E .

Proposed FA Well

Table 5. Floridan Aquifer Monitoring Wells

Maintained by SFWMDMaintained by USGSMaintained by FKAA

Maintained by FPLMaintained by NMB

Exhibit 9E

WELL ID SITE USE NETWORK DATE WELL INSTALLATION COMPLETION

SWWF‐1 Located near SWWF for water elevation well‐wetland monitoring. WQ/WL 12 Months after issuance of CUP

WWF‐1NLocated NE of West Wellfield for water elevation well‐wetland monitoring WQ/WL 12 Months after issuance of CUP

SMH‐1 Located near South Miami Heights wellfield for water elevation well WQ/WL 12 Months after issuance of CUP

Ever‐1 Located near Everglades Labor Camp Wellfield for water elevation well WQ/WL 12 Months after issuance of CUP

Newton‐1 Located near Newton Wellfield for water elevation well WQ/WL 12 Months after issuance of CUP

Hialeah RO Located near new City of Hialeah RO water treatment plant Floridan Monitoring Based on City of Hialeah RO plant construction.

USGS Salt Water Intrusion Line WellsLocations will be determined by the WASD/SFWMD/USGS/DERM to update Salt Intrusion line along County Salt Monitoring 36 months after issuance of CUP

USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 1 Located Near Snapper Creek Wellfield and US‐1* Regional Impact 36 months after issuance of CUP

USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 2Located midway between the Proposed SMH wellfield and the Aquifer Recharge Project.* Regional Impact 36 months after issuance of CUP

USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 3 Located North of SWWF near C‐2 Canal* Regional Impact 36 months after issuance of CUP

USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 4 Located Northeast of Hialeah‐Preston wellfields* Regional Impact 36 months after issuance of CUP

* Exact location to be determined later by MDWASD/USGS/SFWMD/DERM

EXHIB

IT 9F .

New Monitoring Well Completion Schedule

Exhibit 9F

Updated Table F (10/30/09)Miami‐Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD)Past Water Use (2001‐2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

YearPopulationServed*

Per CapitaUsage (gpcd)

Total AnnualUse (MG)

Average AnnualUse (MG)

Max MonthUse (MG)

RatioMax:Average

Month

Total AnnualUse (MG)

Average Month

Use (MG)

Max MonthUse (MG)

RatioMax:Average

Month

2001 2,073,679 151.27 114,493 9,541 9,927.5 1.04 117,159 9,763 10,129 1.04 1.0233

2002 2,103,951 157.06 120,614 10,051 10,961.4 1.09 122,931 10,244 11,163 1.09 1.0192

2003 2,134,223 158.55 123,511 10,293 10,676.1 1.04 125,884 10,490 10,878 1.04 1.0192

2004 2,164,465 156.91 124,301 10,358 10,861.1 1.05 126,685 10,557 11,063 1.05 1.0192

2005 2,194,768 154.91 124,098 10,342 10,734.8 1.04 126,670 10,556 11,031 1.04 1.0207

2006 2,225,040 153.52 124,677 10,390 10,988.6 1.06 127,019 10,585 11,170 1.06 1.0188

2007(b) 2,235,179 142.92 116,602 9,717 10,485.4 1.08

2008(b) 2,213,833 139.59 113,104 9,425 9,786.7 1.04

5‐yearAverage

(2004‐2008)‐ 149.57 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1.05 1.0196

3‐yearAverage

(2006‐2008)‐ 147.74 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1.06 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1.05 1.0198

EX

HIB

IT 12 .

*** From DPZ population projections updated through August 2008 contained in file titled WaterusbyServiceAreaRev11‐14‐08.xlsx

(a) Raw‐to‐finished water ratio is 1.02. MDWASD is in the process of improving its raw water metering/accounting system.

(b) For 2007 and 2008, Population Served represented August 2008 updates January 2007 Population Projections provided by the MDC DPZ, and total annual use represents amounts provided within the service area.

FINISHED WATER HISTORICAL USE RAW WATER HISTORICAL USE(a) RatioFinished:Raw

(Total Annual Use)

TOTAL MDWASD WATER SYSTEM SERVICE AREA**

* Source of Projected Population Information: Miami‐Dade County Planning and Zoning Department (DPZ)

** From MDWASD Raw and Finished Water Historical Data 2001 ‐ 2008

CDMUpdate_Tables_F_&_G_120909.xlsx

10/30/2009

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Elevated Tank/

LeisureCity/

Naranja

Everglades Labor

Camp/

Newton

Transfer from

Elevated Tank/

LeisureCity/

Naranja

Caribb. Park/

Former Plant/

Roberta

Hunter(g)

System-Wide

2009 2,238,700 145.4 325.51 0.86 0.00 324.65 145.02 3.75 2.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 324.41 331.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 331.01

2010 2,263,566 145.4 329.12 1.75 0.00 327.37 144.63 3.80 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 327.09 333.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 333.79

2011 2,288,432 145.4 332.74 2.64 0.00 330.10 144.25 3.85 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 329.77 336.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 336.57

2012 2,321,552 145.4 337.55 3.91 0.00 333.64 143.72 3.90 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 333.33 340.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 340.18

2013 2,347,012 145.4 341.26 5.18 0.00 336.08 143.19 3.95 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 333.54 340.44 2.90 0.00 2.90 343.34

2014 2,372,509 145.4 344.96 5.96 0.00 339.00 142.89 1.83 2.95 2.50 0.00 0.00 333.54 340.82 6.72 0.00 6.72 347.54

2015 2,401,027 145.4 349.11 6.74 0.00 342.37 142.59 0.00 0.00 2.50 5.65 0.00 336.43 344.57 7.41 0.00 7.41 351.98

2016 2,426,789 145.4 352.86 7.51 0.00 345.35 142.31 0.00 0.00 2.50 5.88 0.00 338.73 347.11 8.10 0.00 8.10 355.21

2017 2,452,550 145.4 356.60 8.29 0.00 348.31 142.02 0.00 0.00 2.50 7.84 0.00 339.90 350.23 8.31 0.00 8.31 358.54

2018 2,478,312 145.4 360.35 9.06 0.00 351.29 141.74 0.00 0.00 2.50 13.12 0.00 338.35 353.96 8.31 0.00 8.31 362.28

2022 2,581,358 145.4 375.33 12.12 0.00 363.21 140.70 0.00 0.00 2.50 18.62 7.12 337.34 365.58 9.98 0.00 9.98 375.55

2027 2,710,166 145.4 394.06 15.19 0.00 378.87 139.80 0.00 0.00 2.50 18.62 21.56 337.34 380.02 11.97 0.00 11.97 391.99

2030 2,787,451 145.4 405.30 15.19 0.00 390.11 139.95 0.00 0.00 2.50 18.62 31.21 337.63 389.96 13.97 0.00 13.97 403.93

UPDATED TABLE G (DRAFT 10/30/09)

MDWASD RAW WATER DEMAND BY SOURCE

PROJECTIONS (2009)RAW WATER AADD

(k) (MGD)

Biscayne Aquifer(l) Floridan Aquifer

Total

All SourcesYear Population(k)

Finished

Water

Use

(gpcd)

AADD Finished

Water Use(a)

(MGD)

Water

Conservation(b)

(MGD)

Credit

Reuse/

Reclaimed

Water(c)

(MGD)

Credit

Adjusted

Finished

Water Demand(d)

(MGD)

Adjusted Finished

Water Use

(gpcd)

SW Wellfield

Increase

Hialeah-Preston/

Alexander-Orr

Lime Softening

Total

Biscayne

Aquifer(h)

Hialeah

RO

WTP(i)

Hialeah-Preston/

Alexander-Orr

Blending(j)

Total

Floridan

Aquifer

South Dade(e)

South Miami Heights

Membrane Softening(f)

Update_Table G_102909.xls

11/12/2009

EX

HIB

IT 1

3A

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Elevated Tank/

LeisureCity/

Naranja

Everglades

Labor

Camp/

Newton(j)

Transfer from

Elevated Tank/

LeisureCity/

Naranja

Caribb. Park/

Former Plant/

Roberta Hunter(g)

System-Wide

2009 2,238,700 145.4 325.51 0.86 0.00 324.65 145.02 3.75 2.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 318.05 324.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 324.65 0.00

2010 2,263,566 145.4 329.12 1.75 0.00 327.37 144.63 3.80 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 320.67 327.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 327.37 0.00

2011 2,288,432 145.4 332.74 2.64 0.00 330.10 144.25 3.85 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.30 330.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 330.10 0.00

2012 2,321,552 145.4 337.55 3.91 0.00 333.64 143.72 3.90 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 326.79 333.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 333.64 0.00

2013 2,347,012 145.4 341.26 5.18 0.00 336.08 143.19 3.95 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 327.00 333.90 2.18 0.00 2.18 336.08 0.00

2014 2,372,509 145.4 344.96 5.96 0.00 339.00 142.89 1.83 2.95 2.17 0.00 0.00 327.00 333.95 5.05 0.00 5.05 339.00 0.00

2015 2,401,027 145.4 349.11 6.74 0.00 342.37 142.59 0.00 4.10 2.17 4.80 0.00 329.83 336.80 5.57 0.00 5.57 342.37 0.00

2016 2,426,789 145.4 352.86 7.51 0.00 345.35 142.31 0.00 4.10 2.17 5.00 0.00 332.09 339.26 6.09 0.00 6.09 345.35 0.00

2017 2,452,550 145.4 356.60 8.29 0.00 348.31 142.02 0.00 4.10 2.17 6.66 0.00 333.24 342.07 6.25 0.00 6.25 348.32 0.00

2018 2,478,312 145.4 360.35 9.06 0.00 351.29 141.74 0.00 4.10 2.17 11.15 0.00 331.72 345.04 6.25 0.00 6.25 351.29 0.00

2022 2,581,358 145.4 375.33 12.12 0.00 363.21 140.70 0.00 4.10 2.17 15.83 6.98 330.73 355.71 7.50 0.00 7.50 363.21 0.00

2027 2,710,166 145.4 394.06 15.19 0.00 378.87 139.80 0.00 4.10 2.17 15.83 21.14 330.73 369.87 9.00 0.00 9.00 378.87 0.00

2030 2,787,451 145.4 405.30 15.19 0.00 390.11 139.95 0.00 4.10 2.17 15.83 30.60 331.01 379.61 10.50 0.00 10.50 390.11 0.00

UPDATED TABLE G (DRAFT 10/30/09)

MDWASD FINISHED WATER DEMAND BY SOURCE

PROJECTIONS (2009)ADJUSTED FINISHED WATER AADD (MGD)

AADD

Finsihed

Water

"SURPLUS"

(Col. 19 - Col.

7)

Biscayne Aquifer Floridan Aquifer

Total

All SourcesYear Population(k)

Finished

Water

Use

(gpcd)

AADD Finished

Water Use(a)

(MGD)

Water

Conservation(b)

(MGD)

Credit

Reuse/

Reclaimed

Water(c)

(MGD)

Credit

Adjusted

Finished

Water Demand(d)

(MGD)

Adjusted

Finished

Water Use

(gpcd)

South Dade(e)

South Miami Heights

Membrane Softening(f)

SW Wellfield

Increase

Hialeah-Preston/

Alexander-Orr

Lime Softening

Total

Biscayne

Aquifer(h)

Hialeah

RO

WTP(i)

Hialeah-Preston/

Alexander-Orr

Blending

Total

Floridan

Aquifer


11/12/2009

EX

HIB

IT 1

3B

Footnotes

Phase

SDWWTP

Reclaimed

(mgd)

Facility Recharge Area

Applied

(MGD)

Offset

AADD

(mgd)

Implementation

Year

1 24.3 SDWRP S. Miami Heights 18.6 15.83 2015

2 24.7 WDWRP Alex-Orr 21 20 2022

3 18.8 WDWRP Alex-Orr 16 15 2027

Total (est.) 67.8 55.6 50.83

(j) Becomes standby once SDWRP starts up.

(a) Annual Average Daily Demand (AADD) Finished Water Projections between 2009 and 2030 assume 145.4 gpcd total water

system demand prior to application of credits (e.g. conservation).

(b) WASD is undertaking the 20-year water use efficiency plan and expects reductions in per capita water consumption. Water

Conservation projections were revised based on the 2008 Annual Water Conservation Plan Conserve Florida Redport (March

2009). Real losses in non-revenue water (e.g. unaccounted-for-water) are assumed to remain at less than 10%. The

conservation amounts experienced in 2007 and 2008 were deducted from the 20-year conservation amount and the remaining

conservation amounts were distributed for the remainder of the 20-year period (2009-2027).

(c) Not Used (TBD).

(d) Adjusted after taking credit in finished water demand projections for reductions in finished water use associated with water

conservation.

(k) Population represents August 2008 updates to January 2007 Population Projections provided by the Miami-Dade County

Department of Planning and Zoning.

(e) South Dade (Raw : Finished) Ratio = 1.0 : 1.0

(f) Membrane Softening (Raw : Finished) Ratio = 1.18 : 1.00 (85% Recovery)

(g) Beginning 2015, withdrawals from SMH WTP are considered offsets from Phase 1 GWR near SMH (Metro Zoo)

(h) Base condition raw water use (346.37 mgd) represents values agreed to by SFWMD and MDWASD and demonstrated by

modeling to not cause a net increase in water from the regional canal system. Biscayne Aquifer base condition raw water use

allocation of 346.37 mgd equates to 339.74 mgd of finished water annual average daily demand (AADD) assuming a 1.02 raw-to-

finished water ratio. Phase 1 South District Water Reclamation Plant (SDWRP) Reclaimed Water Projects for Groundwater

Recharge (GWR) and for future West District WRP (WDWRP) for Phases 2 and 3 Canal Recharge as shown in the table below

and assuming a gallon-for-gallon offset. The applied (MGD) amounts represents total Biscayne Aquifer withdrawals to apply a

gallon-for-gallon offset.

(i) RO WTP (Raw : Finished) Ratio = 1.33 : 1.00


11/12/2009

EX

HIB

IT 1

3C

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14

BG (mgd) BG (mgd) BG (mgd) BG (mgd)

Hialeah RO WTP 24.00 7 0 0.00 3.033 8.31 6.311 17.29 6.311 17.29

Hialeah - Preston 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0Blending at Alexander Orr WTP Resulted in Distribution System Water Quality Problems - Project Canceled

Southwest 7.00 2

West 10.50 3

MDWASD System Total 41.50 12

Total Not-To-Exceed Pumpage 0.000 0.00 3.033 8.31 6.311 17.29 6.311 17.29

EX

HIB

IT 14B

(b) New Upper Floridan Aquifer RO WTP (10.0 mgd Phase 1 by 2013); (5.0 MGD Phase 2 by 2027): (2.5 MGD Phase 3 by 2027)

Remarks

See Footnote C

Hialeah - Preston WTP Blending (Project Canceled)

Annual Average

NotesBG = Billion Gallons; MGD = Million Gallons per Day(a) The maximum projected pumpage for the entire MDWASD water service area shall not exceed the annual allocation permitted by SFWMD.

Full Scale Blending Cancelled. Only Minimal Incidental Blending as result of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well Operation

Alexander Orr WTP Blending (Use of Aquifer Storage and Recovery wells for Blending Canceled)

0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00

Table 4 - MDWASD Floridan Aquifer Wellfields Operation Plan Summary (12/09/2009) Pumpage by Wellfield

2023 - 2027WTP Subarea and Wellfield

Wellfield Data Individual Wellfield ANNUAL Pumpage / Allocation (a)

DesignCapacity

(mgd)

Numberof Wells

2007 - 2012 2013 - 2017 2018 - 2022

Permit Permittee Wells Pumpage (mgd)

13‐01556‐W La Gorce CC FL2 0.513‐00059‐W North Miami FL1‐FL3 1613‐00060‐W No Miami Bch F‐1 to F‐4 12Site certification FPL‐Turkey Pt 3‐Jan 1413‐00029‐W Florida City F1 213‐00005‐W FKAA FA‐1 to FA‐5 1013‐00017‐W MDWASD ASR‐1W to ASR‐3W 4.513‐00017‐W MDWASD ASR‐4SW, ASR‐5SW 313‐00017‐W MDWASD Hialeah1RO ‐ 7RO 2006‐00054‐W Miramar F1,F2 2.706‐00120‐W Sunrise Melaleuca 1,2 206‐00120‐W Sunrise Park City 2,3,4,7 606‐00120‐W Sunrise Sprintree1 2.506‐00082‐W Deerfield Beach WF‐22 106‐01474‐W Broward District 2 (2A/NR) F2‐F5 6.606‐00146‐W Broward District 1 F1‐F4 606‐00123‐W Ft. Lauderdale (Prospect) F1 2506‐00123‐W Ft. Lauderdale (Dixie) F2 806‐00038‐W Hollywood F2‐F18 1906‐00954‐W Gulfstream Park 3 0.244‐00001‐W Card Sound Golf Club A(4) 0.644‐00002‐W Ocean Reef Community 2,3,5,6 1.444‐00284‐W Silver Shores MHP WELL 0.02

EXHIBIT 23

Floridan UsersPermitted or Application in‐houseMiami‐Dade, Broward, Monroe

Activity 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

5.3 Recommendations for Real Loss Reduction5.3.1 System Design (Active Review)5.3.2 System Management

5.3.2.3 Asset Maintenance or Replacement5.3.2.4 Reduce Maintenance Response Times5.3.2.5 Active Leakage Control and Sounding Pilot5.3.2.7 Pressure Management5.3.2.8 Speed and Quality of Repairs

Perform Venturi Comparative Tests-WTPsPerform Venturi Comparative Tests-wholesale customersConduct wholesale customer unmetered connection surveyPilot Fixed Network AMR PilotEnhance GIS databaseANNUAL WATER SAVINGS (Million Gallons) 650 1300 1950 2600 3250 3900 4550ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS (Million $) $0.297 $0.595 $0.892 $1.189 $1.487 $1.784 $2.081

Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

5.3 Recommendations for Real Loss Reduction5.3.1 System Design (Active Review)5.3.2 System Management

5.3.2.3 Asset Maintenance or Replacement5.3.2.4 Reduce Maintenance Response Times5.3.2.5 Active Leakage Control and Sounding5.3.2.7 Pressure Management5.3.2.8 Speed and Quality of Repairs

Achieve target real loss of 5 billion gallons per year XAchieve target Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) of 3.0 XANNUAL WATER SAVINGS (Million Gallons) 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200 5200ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS (Million $) $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378 $2.378

EX

HIB

IT 26A .

Table 5-2: Schedule of Real Water Loss Reduction ActivitiesJanuary 2007 through December 2026

Updated 11-16-09

Activity 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

6.3 Recommendations for Apparent Water Loss Reduction6.3.1 Reducing Unmetered Supplies6.3.2 Improved Meter Accuracy6.3.3 Commercial Meter Types and Sizes

6.3.3.2.1 Compound Meters Usage Compared to Same Size Turbine Meters Pilot6.3.3.3 Looking Forward (setting Economic Meter Testing Goals)

6.3.4 Improved Calibration of Wholesale Customer Meters6.3.5 Wholesale Customer Unmetered Connection Analysis

Conduct field accuracy testing of commercial metersPilot AMR to improve data handling and reduce labor cost PilotCharacterize residential water demand patternDetermine economic optimum for residential meter replacementANNUAL WATER SAVINGS (Million Gallons) 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS (Million $) 0.788 1.576 2.364 3.152 3.94 4.728 5.516

Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

6.3 Recommendations for Apparent Water Loss Reduction6.3.1 Reducing Unmetered Supplies6.3.2 Improved Meter Accuracy6.3.3 Commercial Meter Types and Sizes

6.3.3.2.1 Compound Meters Usage Compared to Same Size Turbine Meters6.3.3.3 Looking Forward (setting Economic Meter Testing Goals)

6.3.4 Improved Calibration of Wholesale Customer Meters6.3.5 Wholesale Customer Unmetered Connection Analysis

Conduct field accuracy testing of commercial metersReduce Apparent Losses to 10 billion gallons per year XANNUAL WATER SAVINGS (Million Gallons) 3200 3600 4000 4400 4800 5200 5600 6000 6400 6800ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS (Million $) 6.304 7.092 7.88 8.668 9.456 10.244 11.032 11.82 12.608 13.396

EX

HIB

IT 26C .

Table 6-2: Schedule of Apparent Water Loss Reduction ActivitiesJanuary 2007 through December 2026

Update 11-16-09

11/12/2009

Comparison of WUP Projections and updated Per Capita Projections 103009.xlsRevised Step Chart 103009

420

430MDWASD Finished Water Demands and Water Supply Projections 10/30/2009)

WUP AWS Steps (November 2007)

7 87 8

390.1

360

370

380

390

400

410

420

up

ply

Pro

jec

tio

ns

(M

GD

)

p ( )

WUP Water Demands (November 2007)

Updated AWS Steps (July 2009)

Updated Water Demands (July 2009)

Historical Finished Water Demands

4

6

Biscayne Aquifer Water Use Permit (2012) (Raw = 346.37 MGD)

(Finished Water = 339.74 MGD)

2

54

6

Biscayne Aquifer Water Use Permit (2012) (Raw = 346.37 MGD)

(Finished Water = 339.74 MGD)

2

5 5 7 8

324.6

312.1

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

De

ma

nd

an

d S

u

3

DRAFT

12

3

DRAFT

12

11/12/2009

Comparison of WUP Projections and updated Per Capita Projections 103009.xlsRevised Step Chart 103009

300

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030Year

Project Names (per 2007 AWS program):

1. ASR Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection System for ASR Sys. @ W&SW Wellfields (7.2 MGD ASR/blend, $6.4M)2. Floridan Aquifer Blending Wellfield at Hialeah/Preston (4.7 MGD, $10.3M)3. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 1 Capacity (10 MGD, $93.0M)4. South Distr. W.R.P. Groundwater Recharge Ph 1(18.6 MGD, $357.5M)

5. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 2 (4.5 MGD, $25.0M) (WTP Capacity = 15.0 MGD)6. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 2 (21 MGD, $482.0M) 7. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 3 (16 MGD, $317.5M)8. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 3 (2.0 MGD, $9.7M) (WTP Capacity = 17.5 MGD)

Project Names (per 2007 AWS program):

1. ASR Ultraviolet (UV) Disinfection System for ASR Sys. @ W&SW Wellfields (7.2 MGD ASR/blend, $6.4M)2. Floridan Aquifer Blending Wellfield at Hialeah/Preston (4.7 MGD, $10.3M)3. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 1 Capacity (8.5 MGD, $93.0M)(WTP Capacity = 10.0 MGD)4. South Distr. W.R.P. Groundwater Recharge Ph 1(18.6 MGD, $357.5M)

5. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 2 (4.5 MGD, $25.0M) (WTP Capacity = 15.0 MGD)6. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 2 (21 MGD, $482.0M) 7. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 3 (16 MGD, $317.5M)8. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 3 (2.0 MGD, $9.7M) (WTP Capacity = 17.5 MGD)

EX

HIB

IT 2

8

Project / MilestoneAverage

daily flowMilestone

Completion DateHialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 1 (10.0 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit Completed• Notice To Proceed Construction 12/8/2009• Turnover / Project Completion 12/25/2012

Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 2 (5.0 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit 1/15/2025• Notice To Proceed Construction 7/30/2026• Turnover / Project Completion 10/31/2027

Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 3 (2.5 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit 1/15/2025• Notice To Proceed Construction 7/30/2026• Turnover / Project Completion 10/31/2027

South District WRP Groundwater Recharge Phase 1 (18.6 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit Underway• Notice To Proceed Construction 8/30/2011• Turnover / Project Completion 10/31/2027

West District WRP Canal Recharge Phase 2 (21 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit 1/15/2016• Notice To Proceed Construction 8/30/2018• Turnover / Project Completion 12/31/2021

West District WRP Canal Recharge Phase 3 (16 mgd)• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit 1/15/2021• Notice To Proceed Construction 7/30/2023• Turnover / Project Completion 12/31/2026

EXHIBIT 29

Alternative Water Supply Project Development Deadlines Tied to Increased Withdrawal Above the Base Condition Water Use

Project Reclaimed water generated from and

amount to be treated

Quantity of Reclaimed Wastewater Applied

Reclaimed water used for

Implementation Deadline

1. South District WWTP21.9 mgd

18.6 MGDfinished water assuming 15% treatment loss. The rechargevolume may vary dependingon actual treatment loss.

Recharge South DadeMiami Heights wellfieldsor other project

Dec. 31, 2014

2. South District WWTP89.1 mgd

75.7 MGDFinished reclaimed water assuming 15% treatment loss. The applied volume may vary depending on actual treatment loss.

Biscayne CoastalWetlands or other project

Dec. 31, 2020

3. South District WWTP1 mgd

1 MGD Public access irrigationwater (landfill cap)

Existing

4. West DistrictReclaimed Water Plant24.7 mgd

21 MGDFinished water assuming 15% treatment loss. The recharge volume may vary depending on actual treatment loss.

Recharge Southwest, Snapper Creek, and Alex Orr Wellfields (Alex Orr WTP / Central water system)

Dec. 31, 2021


16 MGDFinished water assuming 15% treatment loss. The recharge volume may vary depending on actual treatment loss.

Recharge Southwest, Snapper Creek, and Alex Orr Wellfields (Alex Orr WTP / Central water system)

Dec. 31, 2026


6.5 MGDminimal treatment losses

Dec. 31, 2025

7. North District WWTP7 mgd

7 MGDminimal treatment losses

Dec. 31, 2025

8. Central District WWTP1.2 mgd

1 MGDminimal treatment losses

Dec. 31, 2025

Dec. 31, 2026

9. South District WWTP Up to 90 MGD* Cooling of FP&Lproposed Units # 6 & 7,and existing Unit #5

Dec. 31, 2026

EXHIBIT 30 .

Reuse Projects and Deadlines

TOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS = 170 MGD

OTHER POTENTIALLARGE SCALE PROJECTS = 75-90 MGDGRAND TOTAL = 245-260 mgdMiami-Dade is committed to providing 170 MGD reclaimed water + 75-90 MGD,contingent on FP&L receiving authorization to construct these power facilities and thefeasibility of the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Rehydration Project.

The scope of these projects will be determined as part of the Ocean Outfall legislation implementation plan due to the Secretary of FDEP by July 1, 2013

TABLE J Aquifer Storage and Recovery

Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR-1-W, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not

done a full recharge and recovery for it. Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table I): Biscayne aquifer water from West Wellfield wells WW-29, WW-30, and

WW-31 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection for storage.

Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table I): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant

Year Actual/

Projected Million Gallons

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Storage Loss

Other Loss*

2012 Projected Stored 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 103.33 103.33 100.00 103.33 100.00 103.33 N/A

2012 Projected Recovered 0.00 67.22 208.39 194.94 208.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A





* Please specify the type of loss: N/A


Instructions for Completing TABLE J, Aquifer Storage and Recovery

Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the raw water source. Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we contact you, this is what you would recognize it as. Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table I): Please tell us the source of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water. Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table I): Please tell us the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water. Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both amounts. Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered. Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on Table I, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.






Year Actual/


Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Storage Loss

Other Loss*










Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR-4-SW, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not

done a full recharge and recovery for it. Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table I): Biscayne aquifer water from Southwest Wellfield wells SW-11, SW-12,

SW-13, SW-14, SW-15, SW-16, SW-17, SW-18, SW-19, SW-20, SW-25, SW-26, SW-27, SW-28, SW-32, SW-33, and SW-34 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection for storage.


Year Actual/


Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Storage Loss

Other Loss*










Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR-5-SW, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not

done a full recharge and recovery for it. Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table I): Biscayne aquifer water from Southwest Wellfield wells SW-11, SW-12,

SW-13, SW-14, SW-15, SW-16, SW-17, SW-18, SW-19, SW-20, SW-25, SW-26, SW-27, SW-28, SW-32, SW-33, and SW-34 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection for storage.


Year Actual/


Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Storage Loss

Other Loss*









WSP-ORC APPENDIX

March 2010

APPENDIX WSP-2

The following data was extracted from the Miami-Dade County 2009-2010 Capital Improvements Program and Multi-

Year Capital Plan. This data presents the Sewer Facilities (Table 8) and Water Facilities (Table 12) as represented in

MDCDMP.

This space was intentionally left blank.

City of Miami Water Supply Facilities Work Plans ___________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________ April, 2010

23

MDCDMP CIE TABLE 8


_________________________________________________________________________ April, 2010

24

MDCDMP CIE TABLE 8


_________________________________________________________________________ April, 2010

25

MDCDMP CIE TABLE 8


_________________________________________________________________________ April, 2010

26

MDCDMP CIE TABLE 12


_________________________________________________________________________ April, 2010

27

MDCDMP CIE TABLE 12

city of miami - official websiteegov.ci.miami.fl.us/legistarweb/attachments/56903.pdfdec 17, 2009...

Documents