city of creede meeting agenda creede town hall packet.pdfconsider retreat agenda . viii. new...

OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

CITY OF CREEDE MEETING AGENDA CREEDE TOWN HALL BOARD OF TRUSTEES October 3, 2017, 5:30 PM 2223 N. MAIN STREET

REGULAR MEETING

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

III. ROLL CALL

IV. REVIEW AGENDA

V. CONSENT AGENDA a. Consider September 5th & September 19th, 2017 Minutes b. Review/Consent of September 2017 Check Detail Report c. Consider October 3, 2017 Unpaid Bills Report [Avail. 10/3] d. Consider 2018 Farmer’s Market Private Event Permit

VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED ACTIONS

a. Consider Resolution 2017-13 Variance for the North 35’ of Lots 6, 7, and 8, South of the North 35’ of Said Lots, in Block 6, South Creede [Recommended by PZC 9/12]

VII. OLD BUSINESS a. Consider Municipal Judge Contract with David Thompson b. Consider Retreat Agenda

VIII. NEW BUSINESS

a. Award Proposal Willow Creek Flume Design-Build

IX. MANAGERS REPORT

X. ADJOURN

POSTED 9/1/17

BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY OF CREEDE, COLORADO – A TOWN

September 5, 2017 REGULAR MEETING

The Board of Trustees of the City of Creede – a Town, County of Mineral, State of Colorado, met in regular session in the Creede Town Hall at the hour of 5:30 p.m. There being present at the call of the roll the following persons:

OFFICIALS PRESENT: Lori Dooley [by phone], Kay Wyley, Catherine Kim, Teresa Wall, Dana Brink, Frank Freer

OFFICIALS ABSENT: Jeffrey Larson

Mayor Pro Tem Wall, presiding, declared a quorum present. Those members of staff also present were as follows: Clyde Dooley, Manager

Randi Snead, Clerk/Treasurer

REVIEW AGENDA Permission to move the train in Basham Park was added to the agenda under New Business. Trustee Kim

moved and Trustee Wyley seconded to approve the agenda as amended. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

CONSENT AGENDA The consent agenda contained the following items:

a. Consider August 1, August 2, August 15, 2017 Minutes b. Review/Consent of August 2017 Check Detail Report c. Consider September 5, 2017 Unpaid Bills Report [Avail. 9/5] d. Consider Parade Permit Headwaters Mountain Bike Race 9/9/17 e. Consider Memorial Bench Application Merle Knous

Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Freer seconded to approve the consent agenda as presented. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED ACTIONS CONSIDER ORDINANCE 403 VACATING PORTIONS OF CAPITOL AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY

Mayor Pro Tem Wall opened the public hearing. No one spoke in opposition or support and no correspondence was received regarding the ordinance. Trustee Wall moved and Trustee Brink seconded to close the public hearing. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall closed the public hearing. Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Freer seconded to approve Ordinance 403 Vacating Portions of Capitol Avenue and Authorizing the Conveyance of Property. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2017-08 EGOLF RE-PLAT OF TRACT 1R, BLOCK 46, SOUTH CREEDE Trustee Brink moved and Trustee Kim seconded to approve Resolution 2017-08 Egolf Re-Plat of Tract 1R,

Block 46, South Creede. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2017-09 JACKSON RE-PLAT OF TRACT 2R, BLOCK 46, SOUTH CREEDE Trustee Brink moved and Trustee Kim seconded to approve Resolution 2017-09 Jackson Re-Plat of Tract

2R, Block 46, South Creede. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

OLD BUSINESS CONSIDER MUNICIPAL JUDGE RFPS

One proposal was received from David A. Thompson. Mr. Thompson was present to answer questions and introduce himself. Attorney Lintott was directed to contact the references listed in his proposal. Trustee Kim

moved and Trustee Freer seconded to appoint David A. Thompson as Municipal Judge contingent on positive reference checks. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. CONSIDER 2016 AUDIT – BLAIR & ASSOCIATES Clerk Snead explained that there had been some miscommunication and the extension had not been filed correctly by the auditor, causing the State Auditor to remove the ability to get an extension for the 2017 Audit next year. Making sure its completed in a timely manner will need to be a priority next year. Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Wyley seconded to accept the 2016 Audit as presented. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2017-10 ADOPTING AGENDA POLICY AND MEETING RULES OF PROCEDURE Clerk Snead explained a correction as suggested by Mayor Pro Tem Wall to strike the portion of item 3 of meeting rules of procedure that read “until it is apparent that no other member of the Council will do so” and Trustee Kim requested that agenda approval be removed. It was replaced by language requiring that the agenda be “presented for the meeting absent any objections.” Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Brink seconded to approve 2017-10 Adopting Agenda Policy & Meeting Rules of Procedure as amended. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. CONSIDER DIRECTION - REMOVING 72-HOUR RESTRICTION OF RVS AND EXCESS WEIGHT VEHICLES FROM CREEDE DEVELOPMENT CODE The Council directed the Planning & Zoning Commission to prepare the final recommendation on the ordinance amending the Creede Development Code to legislate tiny homes for review by the January 16, 2018 work session. Trustee Brink moved and Trustee Kim seconded to extend the Krueger Special Exception Use at 111 E Wall Street to September 5, 2018. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. NEW BUSINESS CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2017-11 APPOINTING KAREN E. LINTOTT AS TOWN ATTORNEY Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Freer seconded to approve Resolution 2017-11 Appointing Karen E. Lintott As Town Attorney. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. CONSIDER HARRISON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING ON FLUME PROJECT Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Freer seconded to approve the Harrison Professional Services Agreement restricted to bid review services only and not to exceed $750. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2017-12 AMENDING ACH AGREEMENT WITH DEL NORTE BANK

Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Freer seconded to approve Resolution 2017-12 Amending ACH Agreement with Del Norte Bank. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried.

CONSIDER VCMF PUNCHING BAG INSTALLATION The Council had no objections to installing a punching bag at the VCMF and staff was directed to proceed. CONSIDER TRAIN MOVE Clerk Snead explained that in order to reduce the chance of destroying either the new pavers or the new pavilion in Basham Park, it would be better to relocate the yellow train as soon as the Historical Society Library was relocated. The Basham Park Committee selected a location along the north edge of the park next to Coffee on the Fly. Trustee Kim moved and Trustee Brink seconded to approve the relocation subject to location approval by the adjacent property owner. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. MANAGER’S REPORT

RIO GRANDE STREET Manager Dooley requested and received direction to proceed with the street closures as proposed in the Rio Grande Subdivision Plan with large boulders. Trustee Freer moved and Trustee Kim seconded that the Board of Trustees of the City of Creede, a Colorado Town, hereby declares Rio Grande Street between West Third and West Fifth Street closed to thru traffic and such area shall hereafter be used by the City as common or open ground. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. AGENDA ITEMS The Council directed Manager Dooley to make sure that all items being considered by motion are placed on the posted agenda rather than only being included in the Manager’s Report in the future. RIO GRANDE STREET PARKING LOT Manager Dooley inquired about whether we wanted to start discussing property use and pursuing special exception use for a parking lot in the new subdivision. The Council felt that it would be best to get all the property straightened out first. RIO GRANDE STREET VACTIONS AND PROPERTY TRANSFERS Manager Dooley requested and received direction to proceed with individual property work on Rio Grande Street. CDOT PROPERTY Manager Dooley explained the CDOT request to purchase part of Eleventh Street and would be presenting more information as it is received. SIMON PROPERTY

Manager Dooley requested and received direction to proceed with a proposed land use application and replat process with the Simons in North Creede. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board of Trustees at this time, Trustee Brink moved and Trustee Wyley seconded that the meeting be adjourned at 7:15 p.m. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Pro Tem Wall declared the motion carried. Respectfully submitted: /Randi Snead/ Randi Snead, City Clerk/Treasurer

BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY OF CREEDE, COLORADO – A TOWN

September 19, 2017

SPECIAL MEETING The Board of Trustees of the City of Creede – a Town, County of Mineral, State of Colorado, met

in regular session in the Creede Town Hall at the hour of 5:35 p.m. There being present at the call of the roll the following persons:

TRUSTEES PRESENT: Kay Wyley, Catherine Kim, Jeff Larson, Teresa Wall, Frank Freer, Dana Brink, Lori Dooley

Mayor Larson, presiding, declared a quorum present. Those members of staff also present were as follows:

Clyde Dooley, Town Manager Randi Snead, Clerk/Treasurer

REVIEW AGENDA Trustee Wall moved and Trustee Kim seconded to approve the agenda as amended. The vote

was unanimous. Mayor Larson declared the motion carried.

EXECUTIVE SESSION EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING POSITIONS RELATIVE TO MATTERS THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATIONS, DEVELOPING STRATEGY FOR NEGOTIATIONS, AND/OR INSTRUCTING NEGOTIATORS, UNDER C.R.S. §24-6-402(2)(E) RELATED TO FLUME PROPOSALS

Trustee Wall moved and Trustee Brink seconded to convene into executive session for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. §24-6-402(2)(e) related to flume proposals. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Larson declared the motion carried.

Trustee Brink moved and Trustee Wall seconded to move out of executive session. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Larson declared the motion carried.

OLD BUSINESS SELECT FIRST CHOICE PROPOSAL WILLOW CREEK FLUME DESIGN-BUILD

Trustee Wall moved and Trustee Brink seconded to select Mays Construction & SGM for the Willow Creek Flume Design Build. After discussion, Trustee Wall withdrew the motion, and the council tabled selection to the October 3rd, 2017 meeting.

ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board of Trustees at this time, Trustee Brink

moved and Trustee Kim seconded that the meeting be adjourned at 5:59 p.m. The vote was unanimous. Mayor Larson declared the motion carried.

Respectfully submitted:

/Randi Snead/

Randi Snead, City Clerk/Treasurer

Type Date Num Name Memo Amount

Sep 17Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10087 Anderson Inge Payment 3 of 4 per Independent Contractor ... -3,000.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10088 Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. 17581051/Loader Lease Payment -1,938.71Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10089 Kentucky Belle Market Aug Monthly Charges -153.94Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10090 Muleys Disposal Service Aug Trash Svcs/Accts 116, 1197, 1198, 1962... -825.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10091 Tomkins Hardware & Lumber Aug Invoice/No Statement Issued/See 8/10 ... -417.08Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 10092 Valley Publishing Advertising -60.15Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 10110 Card Services -59.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 10111 Rocky Mountain Home Health Sup... Housekeeping Supplies -231.15Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 10113 Blair and Associates PC 2016 Audit -8,750.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 10114 Monte Vista Cooperative Monthly Propane & Shop Charges -685.34Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 10115 Del Reynolds Tree Removal Basham & Ballpark -350.00Paycheck 09/15/2017 10093 Catherine Kim -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10094 Dana D Brink -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10095 Frank Freer -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10096 Jeffrey A Larson -351.79Paycheck 09/15/2017 10097 Lori G. Dooley -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10098 Merolyn K Wyley -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10099 Teresa Wall -153.92Paycheck 09/15/2017 10100 AnnKate Sledd -854.11Paycheck 09/15/2017 10101 Benjamin J Davis -1,240.42Paycheck 09/15/2017 10102 Charles A Pilant -667.69Paycheck 09/15/2017 10103 Clyde E Dooley -1,826.97Paycheck 09/15/2017 10104 Kristeen M Lopez -579.26Paycheck 09/15/2017 10105 Kristen R Buchanan -607.66Paycheck 09/15/2017 10106 Randi L Snead -1,425.05Paycheck 09/15/2017 10107 Robert B Schlough -1,223.27Paycheck 09/15/2017 10108 Scott W Leggitt -943.14Liability Check 09/21/2017 941-... United States Treasury 84-6000575 -3,366.94Bill Pmt -Check 09/25/2017 10121 Monte Vista Machine Tool 72207/Library and Bridge Move -7,262.50Bill Pmt -Check 09/25/2017 10120 Town of La Jara CML District 8 Meeting Registration Larson -20.00Check 09/26/2017 10116 City of Creede VOID: Printed over check 0.00Check 09/26/2017 10109 City of Creede VOID: Printed Over Check 0.00Check 09/26/2017 10117 City of Creede VOID: Printed Over Check 0.00Check 09/26/2017 10118 City of Creede VOID: Printed Over Check 0.00Check 09/26/2017 10119 City of Creede VOID: Printed Over Check 0.00Paycheck 09/28/2017 10122 Kiera Gibbons -51.94Paycheck 09/28/2017 10124 Benjamin J Davis -1,159.87Paycheck 09/28/2017 10125 Charles A Pilant -685.02Paycheck 09/28/2017 10127 Kristeen M Lopez -420.19Paycheck 09/28/2017 10126 Clyde E Dooley -1,826.97Paycheck 09/28/2017 10123 AnnKate Sledd -854.11Paycheck 09/28/2017 10128 Kristen R Buchanan -517.16Paycheck 09/28/2017 10130 Robert B Schlough -1,117.25Paycheck 09/28/2017 10131 Scott W Leggitt -901.40Paycheck 09/28/2017 10129 Randi L Snead -1,425.07Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10132 Bohannan Huston LOMR Project 20170368/I#99036 -1,572.50Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10133 Ciello Sept. 2017 -294.66Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10134 Mead Building & Consulting Equip Rental/Gym Work -231.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10135 Mineral County Clerk and Recorder Egolf/Jackson Replat Recording -134.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10136 Mineral County Miner Annual Mineral County Miner Subscription -34.75Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10137 Petty Cash Jackson Notarization Replat -30.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10138 Roger Mann, Sr. Reimburse for Cement Material, Capitol Ave ... -2,021.66Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10139 SLVREC Electricity -1,978.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10140 The Sherwin Williams Co. 2517-4/Sidewalk Yellow Hazard Paint -128.35Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 10141 U.S. Postal Service Annual PO Box Fee -116.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 941-... United States Treasury 84-6000575 -3,005.86Liability Check 09/28/2017 10142 CEBT VOID: City of Creede, 32705SG 0.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 CC... GWRS (CCOERA) 98721-01/1220 -669.22Liability Check 09/28/2017 CC... GWRS (CCOERA) 98721-01/1220 -651.36Liability Check 09/28/2017 457-... GWRS (CCOERA) 98721-01/1220 -155.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 10143 Colorado Department of Revenue VOID: 07-01555 0.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 10144 Colorado State Treasurer VOID: 133001-00-6-001 0.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 10145 Colorado Department of Revenue 07-01555 -2,405.00Liability Check 09/28/2017 10146 CEBT City of Creede, 32705SG -4,359.68Liability Check 09/28/2017 10147 Colorado State Treasurer 133001-00-6-001 -235.87Liability Check 09/29/2017 457-... GWRS (CCOERA) 98721-01/1220 -155.00Liability Adjust 09/29/2017 Adjust to remove 12.5k rule 190.34

Sep 17 -64,709.24

10:56 AM CITY OF CREEDE; A COLORADO TOWN09/29/17 Monthly Check DetailAccrual Basis September 2017

Page 1

10110 09/14/2017 Card Services

08/01/2017 -10.0020730 09/05/2017

Monthly Subscription Treasury Mgmt SoftwarePostage/AR -49.00

TOTAL -59.00

Creede Clerk

Line

Creede Clerk

Line

Type Date Num Name Memo Amount

Sep 17Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3550 B & B Construction ... Trackhoe/dug water line/... -570.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3551 CDPH&E Annual Permits -2,195.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3552 Sangre De Cristo L... Bacteria Analyses -30.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3553 Silver Spruce Enter... Refund 8/30 Utility Pay... -59.40Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3554 American Business ... 130824/Annual Billing Pr... -395.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3555 Holman Landscape ... 17-310/Certify Backflow ... -252.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3556 Kentucky Belle Mar... Water Testing -6.87Bill Pmt -Check 09/07/2017 3557 UNCC August RTL Transmissi... -4.35Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 3558 Accutest Mountain ... Sewer Testing -302.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 3559 USA Blue Book Stenner Duckbill/Ferrule -47.97Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 3560 Card Services -801.05Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 3561 CenturyLink 300794269/Aug Phone -118.11Bill Pmt -Check 09/14/2017 3562 Monte Vista Co-op Mar Charges/Water Tank -114.63Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 3563 Accutest Mountain ... Sewer Testing -327.50Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 3564 DPC Industries, Inc. Chlorine -72.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 3565 Randy Watters Reimbursable SWP Gra... -420.00Bill Pmt -Check 09/28/2017 3566 SLVREC Monthly Electric -3,681.00

Sep 17 -9,396.88

11:06 AM Water and Sewer Fund09/29/17 Monthly Check DetailAccrual Basis September 2017

Page 1

Bill... 3560 09/14/2017 Card Services

Bill 273043 08/07/2017 Card Services 0.00Bill 24929 08/07/2017 -76.62Bill 11570 08/11/2017 -32.46Bill 1ZH628TL0... 08/15/2017 -12.90Bill 16188 08/15/2017 -71.94Bill -9.95Bill SWP

08/16/201708/21/2017 -136.54

Bill 45251 08/25/2017 -39.91Bill 03664 -71.94Bill 12278 -88.98Bill -5.01Bill 3815082 -71.77Bill 6093 -89.95Bill 26618-1 -49.00Bill ADJ3271 -18.93Bill 03661

08/25/201708/25/201708/28/201708/31/201709/01/201709/05/201709/14/201709/14/2017

Sewer Testing ShippingSourcewater Protection Signs (Rei...Sewer Testing ShippingWater TestingWater TestingACH Software for DNBCamera for Water Plant/SWP Reim...Water TestingWater TestingWastewater TestingWastewater TestingWater TestingWater Testing/ShippingPostage/ARWastewater Testing ADJWastewater Testing -25.15

TOTAL -801.05

Creede Clerk

Line

Creede Clerk

Line

ame: ~ E (]_,'{/e_y

PRIVATE EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION

City of Creede 2223 N Main Street Creede, CO 81130

(719-)658-2276

Address: «fl/1 &iur-fy fMJ ~ ~ ~ Vi l?eb-if h Business/Organization(ifapplicable): J:;; =m-~ L.ou{=IZh ~ Phone: 719- ~13-5?./ (0 fe, Email: rn ktntfkr,;,,,k <iJ. (tf) l Cdtn

DescriptionofEvent: ..io/9 £eg&"lf- frrJtJu.U, ca.f/6_, i,t;k iU~, ~;-/le Wo hhoP5 a vztl ~·fa,n mchf:

'

D~~TI~~~Up:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~i Dates and Times of vent: 9om - ;lf m .f wry 5 ,? tty , ~u~-~f

Dates and Times ofTear-Down:3pm·ll:pm aer, fi,t/44, .JUMe-5e{I; i-sf- ' I ' I

Location of Event: 1-f ~ .i:.'trfeT b 1 {P.,,,'ttl?J I.vi k c:1,,J: KG 1 AAfl le (attach map if applicable)

Estimated Number of People Expected to Attend this Event: 100 t

II

H "

I have read, fully understand, and agree to the terms of this Private Event Permit anY attached pages, and the City of Creede' s Public Property Event Policy and Procedures:

City Clerk

10 -1~~~ ~ ~~ff'S~~~T~~~~=~~-~7~-·~~-~--~~~--~---------~ Date

ff./Zi/t.7 Date

Pre-Event Site inspection by: City ___ Applicant ___ Date and Tin¢: ________ _

Post-Event Site inspection by: City ___ Applicant ___ Date and T" : ________ _

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY

Application ·vel14f {Z"f (t1 Fee 'S:> /" J Date Paid tf/?f(r--1

License Agreement Attached? Y D N ll Proof of Insurance Atta¢hed? Y D N D

Board of Trustees Meeting Date _________ _

Approved by Board of Trustees this __ day of ___ _ ___ __,, 20 __

Attest: ___ ___________ City Clerk

CREEDE TOWN BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 3. 2017

THE CREEDE FARMERS AND LOCAL ARTISAN MARKET FOR 2018 SEASON

We are submitting the Private Event Permit Application for Karen Mi Iler and Ed Vita to host the 2018 Creede Farmers and Local Artisan Market along with a check for $50.00 to the Town.

The 2017 market started slow but got better and better as the summer progressed and after we moved from the Days of '92 Event area. This area was on a side street in back of Basham Park and slowly but surely we got down to one vendor because there was no activity for the market at that location. Once we moved to 1st street between Centurylink and San Juan Sports, the couple of vendors we had were selling things before they even got set upl!! Soon, word of mouth got out and we ended the season after Crusin' the Canyon Car Show with at least five to seven vendors who were doing quite well! At this event, we were also able to work with the Elks who set up in our area and did hamburgers. We feel that we were very accommodating for last minute changes and we all benefited from our open air market and the other events.

We are asking if we can continue at this location and do have a backup of the RG Triangle should anything occur where we weren't able to be at the Centurylink location. After a town meeting in which Ed, Karen, a couple vendors and Amy and Michael McNeil from San Juan Sports attended, we talked with Amy and Michael in the parking lot and decided all of us can work together for events that the market or San Juan Sports has and we got first hand experience with this on a couple weekends and it worked out very wel I. There were lots of folks for both events in the same area and everybody prospered. The hours will change from 10-2pm to 9-2pm because of customers coming early to buy. We would also appreciate a little flexibility as far as specific days go. We will continue to do every Friday from around Memorial Day to after the Crusin' The Canyon Car Show but people are asking for Saturdays for the bigger weekends rather than Sundays and we feel we might pick up more vendors with Saturdays. We will never have more than two days but would like to add a Saturday if we think it would do well.

We would really appreciate keeping this location, working with the Town, San Juan Sports and Centurylink to have a very successful 2018 season. We appreciate your consideration. If needed, a copy of the market insurance can be provided in May of 2018.

Thank you.

Karen E. Miller, Market Director, Ed Vita, Co-Director 719-873-5466

JANUARY 2018 FEBRUARY 2018 MARCH 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

APRIL 2018 MAY 2018 JUNE 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5

ff 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24@@ 17 18 19 20 21 23 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 30

JULY 2018 AUGUST 2018 SEPTEMBER 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU I SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1234517 1 2 4 CD 8 9 IO 11 12 14 5 6 7 8 9 11 2 3 4 5

6 ~8 15 16 17 18 19 21 12 13 14 15 16 18 9 10 11 12 13 4 15 22 23 24 25 26 28 19 20 21 22 23 25 16 17 18 19 20 1 22 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30

OCTOBER 2018 NOVEMBER 2018 DECEMBER 2018 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31

St. Joseph's Indian School

Resolution No. 2017-13

VARIANCE FOR THE NORTH 35’ OF LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, SOUTH OF THE NORTH 35’ OF SAID LOTS,

IN BLOCK 6, SOUTH CREEDE WHEREAS, Sharon Vick has applied for a variance in accordance with Sec. 9-03-090 of the Creede Development Code (hereinafter “Development Code”) for the construction of a replacement residence on the North 35’ of lots 6, 7, and 8, south of the north 35’ of lots 6, 7, and 8, in Block Six, South Creede; and WHEREAS, this property neither meets the minimum 5,000 square feet requirement for construction of a residence nor meets the minimum lot or frontage widths. However, the property has had a residence on it since the late 1890’s or early 1900’s; and WHEREAS, the front and rear set-backs for a residence per the Development Code are 15’ and 20’ respectively while the replacement residence will be 1’2” from the front property line and 13’10” from the rear property line; and WHEREAS, the north side yard set-back is currently out of compliance with the Development Code. However it will be within compliance with the proposed replacement residence; and WHEREAS, there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to this site that do not apply generally to other properties in Creede; and WHEREAS, the granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity and the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 12th, 2017 and Board of Trustees conducted a public hearing on October 3rd, 2017 after providing notice and after consideration of all information and public comments before taking action on such application.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF CREEDE, A COLORADO TOWN, THAT:

The Board of Trustees hereby grants the following deviations from the Creede Development Code to allow Sharon Vick to replace her current residence:

1. A new residence may be constructed on the lot even though the minimum 5,000 square foot is not met; and

2. The front yard set-back will be reduced to 1’2” instead of the 15’ as stated in the town’s Development Code; and

3. The rear yard set-back will be reduced to 13’10” instead of the 20’ as stated in the town’s Development Code; and

4. The replacement residence will be constructed within one (1) year to ensure that the stated purpose of the variance request is realized.

5. The City Manager shall notify the applicant of this Variance within five (5) days after the Board of Trustees decision has been rendered.

6. This Resolution will be recorded in Mineral County and will run with the property unless otherwise amended by the Board of Trustees for the City of Creede, a Colorado Town.

7. The Variance may be revoked for failure to comply with the conditions stated

herein after conducting a hearing on such revocation and providing written notice to the property owner of the time and date of the hearing at least ten (10) days in advance and describing the nature of the alleged violations.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017.

CITY OF CREEDE: ATTEST: __________________________________ ____________________________________ Mayor: Jeffrey Larson Date Clerk, Randi Snead Date

C:\Users\Creede Clerk\Documents\City of Creede's Documents\City of Creede\Planning & Zoning\Packet Materials\2017\Vick Variance.doc

VICK VARIANCE

TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Clyde SUBJECT: Sharon Vick Variance request DATE: August 15, 2017

Sharon Vick submitted a Land Use Application requesting a variance on her property including front and back yard setbacks. I think once you see the survey and property description you’ll understand.

This has got to be one of my favorite property descriptions – are you ready?:

“THE NORTH THIRTY-FIVE FEET OF LOTS SIX, SEVEN AND EIGHT, SOUTH OF THE NORTH THIRTY-FIVE FEET OF SAID LOTS IN BLOCK SIX, SOUTH CREEDE.”

Gotta love it – don’t ya. Anyway, once it all sinks in, I think you’ll all agree it makes sense under the circumstances. If you look at one of the 1905 pictures of Creede, this house is in it. So is the old Kulyk’s house, but the Dresser house is not. I think crowding people in to tight spots has always been an issue with the housing problems we still face today.

As you can see from the survey these houses were built on the western edge of their lots [the fences actually extend into La Garita Avenue] and situations like this are considered legal non-compliance or more commonly referred to as “grandfathered-in” when new regulations create the problem. I think it’s fair to allow this “grandfathered-in” situation to continue with new construction – again because of the circumstances.

One of the things about the “due process” is it allows neighbor’s and the general public to comment on our thinking prior to the Board of Trustees decision in the form of two (2) public hearings.

And speaking of the two public hearings, I’m planning the public hearing for you to be on September 19th and for the Board of Trustees October 3rd.

2

Randi reminded me yesterday that if all goes according to plan, I’ll miss the next two Planning & Zoning meetings. So I’ve included our Variance regulations and review criteria to help answer any of your questions, followed by a draft of the resolution I plan on presenting to the Board of Trustees for their consideration in October.

9-03-090 Variance.

In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations, or traffic conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. It is not the intent of this section to allow variances in the classification of uses of property.

(a) Review Procedures. Applications for a variance shall follow the general review procedures set forth in §9-03-020, General Procedures and Requirements. Applications for variance may be initiated by the owner of property for which a variance is desired.

(b) Review Authority. The Board of Adjustment shall review and render a decision on an application for a variance after conducting a public hearing. The decision of the Board of Adjustment may be appealed to Board of Trustees [see pg. 70] pursuant to §9-03-130, Appeal.

(c) Review Criteria. The Board of Adjustment shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for a variance:

1. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation andenforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of the Development Code without grant of special privilege;

2. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution ofpopulation, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety;

3. Such other factors and criteria related to the subject property, proposeddevelopment, or variance request as the decision-making body deems applicable to the proposed variance.

(d) Required Findings. The Board of Adjustment shall make the following written findings before granting a variance:

1. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilegeinconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district;

2. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;

3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons:

(i) The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code;

(ii) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone; or

(iii) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone district;

(e) Conditions. A variance granted by the Board of Adjustment may contain limitations as to time or disposition or use of the tract in question in order to ensure that the stated purpose of the variance request is realized.

(f) Action Notice. The City Manager shall notify the applicant for a variance in writing of the Board of Adjustment’s action within five (5) days after a decision has been rendered.

(g) Expiration. The variance approval expires if a building permit is not obtained within one (1) year of the approval.

Reason for Variance Application:

Owner seeks to entirely demolish the existing residence and replace with a new single family residence. The lot is 35 wide by 75' deep and, therefore does not conform to City of Creede R-1 Zoning standards in terms of lot size minimum square footage and minimum lot width or frontage.

In addition to relief from lot size minimum requirements, we seek relief from two setback requirements. The first is relief from the front setback requirement of 15'. We would like to be able to follow the same setback as the existing home, which is currently only 1 '-2· from the existing property line; however this distance is 11 ' -8" from the existing fence line. We are working with our neighbors to put together a group application for a boundary adjustment which, pending approval, will make the fence line the actual property line and, therefore, the resulting front setback would be 11' a· and not 1' 2". Because the structures on both the north and south sides of the subject parcel are set back the same distance (also roughly 1 ') from their respective front property lines, granting relief from this setback requirement will not alter the nature of the neighborhood, and will not cause any harm to the neighbors. The second setback requirement we seek relief from is the rear setback requirement of 20'. We wish to build within 13' 1 O" of the rear setback. The City of Creede does allow accessory buildings or alley loaded garages to be within 5' of a rear setback. This lot is a bit unusual for the City of Creede in that it does not have an alley on the rear lot-line, so an alley loaded garage will not be possible for this parcel. Because the R-1 Zoning standards do allow construction within 5' of a rear setback, we feel that our request to build within 13' 1 O" of the rear setback given the space constraints of the lot is also not unreasonable, and does not change the essential character of the neighborhood. We fully intend to abide by the side setback requirements of 5'. It is worth noting that the existing residence does encroach 1' e· into the north side setback and this setback encroachment will be cured as a result of the construction of the new residence.

The existing residence is in very poor condition and lacks a proper foundation and insulation, making it suitable for summer use only. To remodel the existing residence and bring it up to modern standards would be cost prohibitive. If this variance is granted, the resulting residence, which will be designed for yearround use will have an economic benefit for Creede as the owner intends to use it in the winter. It will be an upgrade to the general housing stock in Creede and it will be an opportunity for the City to have another residence equipped with a water meter. Thank you for your consideration.

- - ~..,.,,.. .. ---- -

MOTi: "°*"'*'W to CWlirodo ... ,.,,., ....... ~ ......... .e.'ltic.id~Ol'ff~ ., .... ......,.., wllW\ ..... .,....°""''°"~er.d\~~ no...,..-.,..,oc:MonbQMcf '4'0"'"'f.._. in ..

.,.,.,.~ ..... "°"'*"'"" trOMh dot•of~~~

;\ 1\ \\ l\

I I I I I

' I I I I

Lot 5

Lot 3

LEGEM) Fol.rdlllarurwd fl»~

lbtoi/laUttJol'r

@ S« l'tt I Cqr.\ IU awl

~,.,,,_aw ..

D ~

IN61lJ/ ,,_ c..,

*lyl'o#

20

Lot Survey

N

~ The North 35 Feet of Lots 6, 7, and 8,

South of the North 35 Feet of Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 6,

w )( E

! s Graphic Scale

10 0

5

~r .. ~

Scale 1° • ')JJ'

~BASIS

C:0..-- ONI - an 0 b9ct1r°Q of ...-M'Sn~lll.M en-Ccpe at IN Nl4 Cor. S.C. 36 and tt.1€ Cor. Sec.~ l9d lo tta~tl\'1"-.

South Creede, City of Creede,

Located In the NE~ Section 36, T ownshlp 42 North, Range 1 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian,

Mineral County, Colorado.

SUWEYOR'S STATEMENT I. Vtm.D.l<Mtrman. o '"1 ~ lol1d~r.h $1!olltofCalorodo,do~~1hoth~wao~ ti\' llW and from llw dolo of 0 --.......- ti\' .... and It tna and corT9Cl to llw bN of rt11 ~and i.o.t.

MONUMENTED SURVEY PLAT DEPOSITING CERTlFlCATE

o.po.tbKI~ doyo.__ ___ , /\.D. 'lf!fl, ot __ O'Cloc:X __M.,ln

tr. Lond St.--y Plots ot Reception No--------Book No-------- • Mcf:>No.

oftlw r.corde of t.tn.rol CD,rl:f, Colorado.

TIU.:

~con Rincon Associates, Inc. P.0. .... 1112$- CO_ Vl'J .,._

Lot Survey

The Nor1h 35 F...t of lot9 6. 7, and 6. SoUth of the Nol1h 35 F...t of Lota 6, 7, orrcJ 8,

etock6. South er..o.. Oty of er..c».

Loc:oted r. IN N£I' 5edlorl 36. T.....-.Np42Nor111.~ l 'W..t. -~Pmq>al~

~Ccu11y •

Cclcrodo. -""- -JobHo.S91 -lofl

To the City Trustees of Creede, Colorado:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide input for the requests for variance.

The city of Creede is a unique and special place for many of its citizens. Most of its homes are small

dwellings on small lots that reflect the unique history of Creede. The lot in question is located on 112 La

Garita Street and sits on a row of small lots and one-story homes.

Construction restrictions on small lots are vital to the quality of our neighborhoods. They maintain the

unique look and spirt of Creede. These restrictions provide a control and balance for new construction in

relationship to the other homes in the area.

We also support the growth of our town and we welcome the economic opportunities for employment

the new construction would provide to our citizens.

With these thoughts in mind, our neighborhood would support the issuing of a variance restricted to a

one-story home. I-

*' J4r l:J ~c..~~J.~ , fZ.<J.> ' ""'T l\fl.l5~t-k.

Respectfully,

Q f{ ~!+Cf ~~Jr R1c_/{ftf<D

Z...c I ~ 2.t\ cL (._l{~ek lo .. .J

J..o )- t

L T~ L \l\l ~

~ ~4T~ _. (J~ .I ,1~ (JU~

RotJ R.oL nds a 0 5 £ . aND ~:fTfl€F:T

cl /

'3lf:S

Y\() 4f{ir c rc n a S 1n1 /) < _ ~'a 1 ,,., S1" . 5? I I ~f)

•

0

PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS IN ORDER OF RECIEPT, LEAST RECENT TO MOST RECENT-RS

'f!,-e,~eriy s. LA~tV !A-~ .~a~N'-"

~v;J . ti~

~ -t'"E~ll'1 A.. )_A «.S'4~(

J~S.J4J4'" J' T

(''1..~€ ~CJ ~/130 I

~kvs~

~/h~P-~ ' J0 11e k. ner

L ( n 1 /h" J {IS£ 2nd' sf

*SEE EMAIL FOLLOWING PETITION

Creede Clerk

Oval

Creede Clerk

Line

1

Randi Snead

Subject: FW: Vick Variance

From: Libby Lamb > Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM Subject: Vick Variance To: Randi Snead <clerk

Randi,

Please remove my name from this petition. I feel Mr. Rickard misrepresented the facts the day I was walking by.

In fact, I thought he was in favor of the variance for the Vick's property.

Sincerely,

Libby Lamb (Elizabeth K. Lamb)

p~>rtCV\ \ V\ 0 FY l c ·r ) ( ' \,W - l,. \- .....

Scott Rickard 201E.2nd

Manuel Zarate 202 E. 2nd

Ann Zarate 202 E. 2nd

Ron Rounds 205 E. 2nd

Kindra Rounds 205 E. 2nd and 1010 S. Main

Stephen Reed 115 E. 2nd

Christine Brandt 115 E. 2nd

John Gary Brown 115 E. 2nd

Susan Madrid 123 E. 1st

Jane McPherson 112 E. 2nd

Stan Lentz 425 S. Main

Julie Lentz 425 S. Main

Elizabeth Lamb 106 E. 2"d

Beverly Larson 305 S Main

Terry Larson 305 S Main

Julie Kushner 115 E. 2nd

Larry Morgan 115 E. 2nd

Gwen Payne 205 E. 6th

Patsy Louth 401 La Garita

Forest Tivey 110 La Garita

Mary Ashley 1006 S. Main

Maya Muse 106 w. 6th

Julie Meiser 110 La Garita

Diane Singer 105 La Garita

Sandra Kroll 107 E. 2nd

Erin Lynn Keech 1323 Rio Grande

Manuel Zarate

From: Sent: To:

scott rickard Thursday, September 7, 2017 10:25 AM Manuel Zarate

Subject: Fwd: Variance Input Attachments: Variance lnput.docx; A TI00001.htm

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: scott rickard < Date: August 14, 2017 at 12:19:45 PM GMT-6 To: Subject: Fw: Variance Input

Clyde, this is a unsigned copy of the proposed input to the variance request we discussed. We also discussed our meaning of single story structure if that needs to be put in writing, let me know. We discussed other aspects of the request that you can convey to whomever you feel appropriate. Thanks for your time and stand ready for further dialogue as needed.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

B gin h n ar<lcd me age:

On Saturday. August 12, 2017~ 12:12 PM, Manuel Zarate wrote:

1

Dear Planning Commission Members,

In response to the City of Creede, Notice of Public Hearing regarding variance's for the middle 35 feet of

lots 6, 7 and 8, Blocks 6 of South Creede:

Lots 6, 7 and 8 are each 100 feet long. The variances request seeks to change only the middle 35 feet of

each of the lots. The remaining 65 feet of the three lots are not included in the variance request.

The request, if granted, would set a precedent for the abandonment of the R-1 zoning standards that

the city and planning commission established for the citizens of Creede. Since the variances would only

be applied to the middle 35 feet of lots 6, 7 and 8, acceptance of the variances request will create a

selective bias and unfair treatment to the owners of the other 65 feet of lots 6, 7 and 8.

We request the variances be amended and applied to the full 100 feet of lots 6, 7 and 8 and applied to

any other middle lot in the city of Creede. This action will terminate the need for R-1 zoning rules.

The variance request should now read: Setbacks will be 7.5 feet from the current western boundary of

lot 6 and eastern boundary of lot 8. North and side setbacks will be 5 feet for each of the 3 parcels.

Setbacks will be applied to all of lots 6, 7 and 8 as well as to any other multiple cross lot ownerships.

Applying this precedent will eliminate varying zoning standards within existing lots.

Manuel Zarate

From: Sent: To:

scott rickard < Thursday, September 7, 2017 10:28 AM Manuel Zarate

Subject: Fwd: More thoughts on variance request

Sent from my iPhone


From: scott rickard <srickl [email protected]> Date: August 14, 2017 at 10:52:01 PM GMT-6 To: manager , Zarate Manuel <m > Subject: More thoughts on variance request

Clyde, The 2 story portion of house on submission is l 6x60x2 stories = 1920 sq ft plus an estimated one story portion of 30x9=270 sq ft. Grand total estimated as 2190 sq ft which completely overpowers a 2625 sq ft residential lot.

Sent from my iPhone

1

Thank you, Clyde, for the schedule. I very much want to work this out with all parties to proceed with the house. It is fine with me if you want to give the neighbors my email address or phone number. I would be happy to talk to any of them.

Regards,

Sharon

On Monday, August 14, 201 7 1:01 PM, Clyde Dooley <mana wrote:

Hi Sharon,

I thought I'd send you the schedule of the process we'll be going thru with the Board of Trustees. As you can see it will be October 3rd, 2017 when the Trustees will make the final decision.

I wanted to send you this because some of your neighbors have approached me about your plans and would like to talk with you if possible. I of course don't want to share your contact information with them without your approval. So, would it be alright with you, if I gave them your email address?

Hope all is well with you,

Clyde

2

Manuel Zarate

From: Sent: To:


Subj ect: Fwd: Creede

Sent from my iPhone


From: scott rickard <sri Date: August 15, 2017 at 9:29:56 AM GMT-6 To: Clyde Dooley <manag Subject: Re: Creede

Thanks Clyde. I appreciate your assistance.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, August 15. 20 17, 8:35 AM, Clyde Dooley <mana > wrote:

Good Morning Scott,

Thanks for your email about the size of the proposed house. As you can see Sharon is willing to talk with the neighbors about their concerns and below is her email address.

Have a good day,

Clyde

From: Sharon Vick [mail Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 4:22 PM To: Clyde Dooley <mana Subject: Re: Creede

1

Manuel Zarate

From: Sent: To:

scott rickard Thursday, September 7, 2017 10:29 AM Manuel Zarate

Subject: Fwd: Request for variances

Sent from my iPhone


From: scott rickard Date: August 15, 2017 at 1 :16:54 PM GMT-6 To: skv Subject: Request for variances

Hi Sharon this is from Scott in Creede. There are numerous concerns regarding the variance application submitted in your behalf. To date most property owners adjacent to or in close proximity have signed a document stating this concern that will be presented to the proper authorities at the appropriate time. There are numerous concerns stated by the signers but the predominant ones stem from the fact that a multiple story structure will be erected if the variances are approved. If you're interested in discussing some of the concerns I've heard please call me and I'll share them with you. Looking forward to hearing from you. Scott Rickard 210-332-2185

Sent from my iPhone

1

Manuel Zarate

From: Sent: To:


Subjed: Fwd: Request for variances

Sent from my iPhone


From: scott rickard Date: August 16, 2017 at 7:32:46 PM GMT-6 To: s Subject: Re: Request for variances

Sharon, Thanks for calling. I tried to give you as honest an opinion about your request for variances status as I could but that is all it was is my opinion based on the information I currently have. As you know there is a meeting with the planning and zoning board on 12 Sept and the one on 3 Oct with the board of trustees that will give the final decision. Again thanks for calling. Feel free to call if you would like further discussions.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 15, 2017, at 1:16 PM, scott rickard < wrote:

Hi Sharon this is from Scott in Creede. There are numerous concerns regarding the variance application submitted in your behalf. To date most property owners adjacent to or in close proximity have signed a document stating this concern that will be presented to the proper authorities at the appropriate time. There are numerous concerns stated by the signers but the predominant ones stem from the fact that a multiple story structure will be erected if the variances are approved. If you're interested in discussing some of the concerns I've heard please call me and I'll share them with you. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Scott Rickard 210-332-2185

Sent from my iPhone

1

1

Randi Snead

From: Jane Macpherson <hanSent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 9:07 AMTo: [email protected]: P&Z Meeting on September 12th

Hello,

I don't believe it would be a good idea to grant variances to build a 2‐story home on the single lot on La Garita. To build a 2‐story home there would require variances on 3 to 4 building codes. There are codes in place for a reason. It would set a very bad precedent. It would open the door to over building throughout the town. While I am all for more housing, it needs to be done on the proper scale.

I don't think anyone has an issue with them replacing the existing cabin with a new 1‐story building, But if they want to build a bigger home, they need to find a bigger, more appropriate lot.

Thanks, Jane MacPherson

September 8, 2017

TO: Planning Comminsion City of Creede

SUBJECT: Variance's From R-1 Zoning

STANDARDS: Block 6 South Creede

COMMENTS:

I, Terry A. Larson do not think it is proper or correct to give or authorize a variance from the R-1 zoning standards in this case. I understand that all the people I have talked to about this, and the people who live in that area are against the change in zoning standard in this case. It is not a standard size building lot, 50 ft. by 100 ft., it has a house already on the property and I think this is a summer home now! The houses on each side of the present house are also on substandard or small lots. If you give a variance to the above case, why have zoning standards?

You will only be doing your job if you go along with the present zoning standard and wishes of the present property owners in the area.

I own residence and a business property in Creede.

rfe ·v..j r .,,e Terry Jf: Larson ~

To the Planning Commission for the City of Creede:

Re: New residence for "north 35' of lots 6,7,8- Block 6, of South Creede

This non-conforming lot was deeded before the existing zoning regulations.

The deteriorating property is of little use to our family as it is. The lot and house

has been in the family for 48 years. It is our desire to build a structure that can be

used year round for multiple family members.

It is our intent that the house will not only be pleasing in appearance, be

functional and safe, but add to the property value of the neighborhood.

Thank you for your consideration,

The Eckert and Vick families

#~-'V~

1

Randi Snead

From: Kentucky Belle <kentucSent: Tuesday, September 12,

.comSubject: Planning and zoning

To the Creede City Council, Mayor and Planning and Zoning Committee, I am favor of the variance brought before you. I feel that the inability to build a better Creede is a detriment to the economic well being of the community. By changing the structure, it increases the valuation of the property. Increasing the tax base of that property and the economic well being of Creede. Also there is no basis for not having a two story structure, as there are a number of them in the area. There are a number of non conforming lots within the city limits. I feel this eventually needs to be re-evaluated by the planning and zoning committee. But this needs to be approved now, as it sets a precedence for the future and building in the City. Without change we stagnate, and I for one would like to see the area continue to grow as we progress into the future. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ron Fief Owner Kentucky Belle Market

1

Randi Snead

From: Kathy Van Gieson <blujeSent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:14 PMTo: clerk@ .com; Van Gieson; Greg VangiesonSubject: Variances for non-conforming lots within the City of Creede without restrictions or conditions

Dear Randi, My husband and I, Greg and Kathy Van Gieson are property owners within the City of Creede (intersection of Wall and Cliff Streets) and would like to request that it be on record that we are in favor of variances for non-conforming lots within the City of Creede without restrictions or conditions. Greg has done construction in numerous cities in Colorado and New Mexico. It is his feeling that the variance process is used on a case by case basis just for these instances as not to restrict or put blanket limitations over a whole city. So basically therefore, it is not necessary to implement guidelines that blanket the whole community. We understand that there is a Planning and Zoning meeting tonight which we are not able to attend. If you have any questions about our position you can contact us at

@yahoo.com or 719- - Thanks much and kind regards, Kathy and Greg Van Gieson

1

Randi Snead

From: Kathy Van Gieson <bluSent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:58 PMTo: maSubject: Approval of the Vick Variance

Dear Randi and Clyde, Greg and Kathy Van Gieson would like to submit our approval of the Vick variance and are in favor of the variance to change the setbacks and be able to rebuild on a nonconforming lot without any conditions. Please contact us at @yahoo.com or 719- have any questions. Thanks much and our kind regards, Kathy and Greg Van Gieson This email is in addition to the email previously sent this afternoon.

1

Randi Snead

From: Kay Van Gieson < @yahoo.com>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:58 PMTo: [email protected]: City Planning and Zoning Public Hearing Variance Request Tonight, September 12, 2017

To Whom it May Concern,

As owners of property in the City of Creede, we are in favor of variance for non-conforming lots within the City of Creede without restrictions or conditions.

Sincerely, JR Van Gieson Kay Van Gieson

To the Board of Trustees of Creede Colarado

Re: Variances for new residence at "north 35" of lots 6, 7,8-

Creede

Ownership of this lot predates lot size restrictions. It has been in the family for

almost fifty years. I A variance is asked for because a set of conditions exist thal we did not create.

It is the desire of the Eckert/McQuatters/Vick family to buil~ a structure on this

property that can be used year round, that is functional, safe and large enough for

the whole family.

Creede Development Code section (d}

3. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the fqllowing reasons:

(ii) There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions

applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply gen~ralty to other

properties in the same zone; or

(iii) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified

regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoye~ by the owners of

other properties in the same zone district *

41~71~-» Sharon Vick "

[) '-i-< 1 ~j +he-. / 1. $e,pl Lo I ~ p ~bl,· c::.... k e.a..v ,·._, j

I 1- W C\ ~ S 1-oi +-e.. J.. +.. ko. t Ko rJ k <:> \A ""d ~ Cj Q. V-C\.d .e.- l S 2 g -Fe. e + +~ \\ \....l k e_ V\ 1' '\I\ .f"c, c_ +

1' f- I S' i 8 .f:.e e 4*- -h. 11 41

IX. ~cf C?Pit,~ !1o 17 &t-1- cf. f2 ()(/ n d?

(l fT.--/.--7 Cf Su 1r f( 1 C..: I< II IZ.O

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES

CITY OF CREEDE, A COLORADO TOWN This CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES (hereinafter “Agreement”) is effective as of October 3, 2017, by and between David A. Thompson (“Judge”) and the City of Creede, a Colorado Town and municipal corporation, by and through its governing body (“Town”). 1. RETENTION Town hereby hires Municipal Judge to render such legal services customarily rendered by such official and as further specified herein. 2. SCOPE OF WORK AND DUTIES A. Judge shall perform all work necessary for the provision of municipal judge services, including, without limitation, the following: (i) Municipal Court: Judge will preside over the City’s Municipal Court as needed and to use

his independent judgment in enforcing violations of Municipal Ordinances or Codes that may come before the Court. The court is generally held once a month or on an as-needed basis.

(ii) Fines: Judge will impose fines in accordance with the City’s fine scheduled and will fulfill

all other duties of a Municipal Judge. (ii) Consultation: Judge will be available for consultation with Town or designated staff as

needed on legal matters which are within his area of operation on an as-needed basis. 3. TOWN DUTIES Town agrees to provide such information, assistance, cooperation, and access to books, records, and other information as is necessary for Judge to effectively render his professional services under this Agreement. Town further agrees to abide by this Agreement and to timely pay Judge as established by this Agreement. 4. COMPENSATION Compensation shall be on an hourly basis at $75/hour. Authorization shall be procured for expenses in excess of $100 that are incurred outside the scope of presiding over municipal court. Invoices for services shall be prepared and submitted on a monthly basis. Payment thereof is due within 30 days. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

Judge shall perform all legal services required under this Agreement as an independent contractor of Town, and shall remain at all times as to Town a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are required under this Agreement. Neither Town nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Judge renders the legal services required under this Agreement, except as otherwise set forth. 6. INSURANCE Judge maintains, at his sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to Town during the entire term of this Agreement, including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance: Professional Liability Insurance: A policy of professional liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than a combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).

7. INDEMNIFICATION Town agrees to undertake its statutory duty and indemnify Judge against, and will hold harmless from, any and all claims or liabilities that may be asserted, or claims by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the work, operations or activities of Judge within the course and scope of her employment hereunder, but nothing herein shall require Town to indemnify Judge for liability arising from his own negligence. A. Town will promptly provide a defense and pay any judgment rendered against the Town, its officers, agency or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of, or in connection with, such work, operations, or activities of Town; B. In the event Judge is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Town for such damages or other claims solely arising out of, or in connection with, the work operation or activities of Town, Town agrees to pay to Judge any and all costs and expenses incurred by Judge in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and Judges’ fees. 8. TERM, DISCHARGE AND WITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on October 3, 2017 and shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by either party hereto. This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time. Withdrawal from any court or administrative proceeding shall be made in accordance with the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure and Professional Conduct. In the event of such discharge or withdrawal, Town will pay Judge professional fees in accordance with this Agreement for all work done through the date of cessation.

9. CONFLICTS Judge represents that he has no present or contemplated employment adverse to Town. Judge agrees that he will not represent clients in matters adverse to Town while serving the Town. However, Judge may have past and present clients or may have future clients, which, from time to time, may have interests adverse to Town and reserves the right to represent such clients in accordance with the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct.

10. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT AND FORUM This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted, both as to validity and performance of the parties, in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. In the event of any dispute hereunder, forum shall be in Alamosa County. 11. INTEGRATED AGREEMENT; AMENDMENT This Agreement contains all the agreements of the parties and cannot be amended or modified except by written agreement. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to the matters covered in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing. 12. CORPORATE AUTHORITY The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that in so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date of execution by the Town. DATED: _______________ CITY OF CREEDE, A COLORADO TOWN By: __________________ Attest: __________________ David A. Thompson By: __________________ David A. Thompson

OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

CITY OF CREEDE RETREAT AGENDA SOWARD RANCH BOARD OF TRUSTEES October 20 & 21, 2017 6164 MIDDLE CREEK ROAD

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2017

9 AM – 10 AM WELCOME & INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS 10 AM – NOON REVIEW MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT

REVIEW ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS FOCUS ON KEY AREAS

MUNICIPAL CODE LAW ENFORCEMENT

NOON LUNCH 12:45 PM-4 PM FOCUS ON KEY AREAS

WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM SPRING MASTER PLANNING FLOODPLAIN PARK IMPROVEMENT PLANNING

SATURDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2017

9 AM – NOON UPDATE ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS GOAL IMPLEMENTATION WITH STRATEGIC PLANNING: PRIORITIZATION, 2018 BUDGET, IMPLEMENTATION

of 2

Manager’s Report

To: Mayor and Board of Trustees Date: October 3, 2017 From: Clyde Dooley 2018 Preliminary Budget – FYI Attached is the preliminary budget for 2018. Randi, Ben, AnnKate and I are going to meet Monday and I may have some changes to report. As you can see from the attached draft we had some confusion on what account numbers we were using and that’s something Randi and I can work our when we both get a breather. Once we get that sorted out, we’ll come up with a schedule of budget workshops to discuss the individual funds as we’ve always done. I’ve emailed Fred a couple times about a law enforcement contract but haven’t heard back from him. We should also discuss and decide what we want to do with the Rio Grande Street Subdivision. Last meeting, we tabled the discussion about going thru a formal process for public parking. Robert Hosselkus got back with me about closing Rio Grande Street to thru traffic and he’d prefer we wait until we develop 4th Street all the way to Loma. His concerns are of course being able to get a fire truck or ambulance to the five homes in the area. He’s okay for putting some rocks at 3rd and 5th Streets, but not at 4th. Rebecca & Caleb Simon – FYI Rebecca, Caleb, and I met with Toby from Davis Engineering last Monday to discuss a boundary line agreement for their and their neighbor’s property in North Creede. Toby is working on the survey of their requests and once I receive it, I will clarify everything for an application to start the process. Zero Error Network – FYI For the record Kenny Swinehart with Zero Error Network got with Ben last month to install the 2’ dish we agreed to back in July and they determined it was more practical and safe to install in on the building instead of the tank. August Finances – FYI Budget YTD General Fund (19,692) 48,717 Capital Improvement Fund (11,938) 45,445 Conservation Trust Fund 1 1,398 Virginia Christensen Fund 58 (177,066) Water & Sewer Fund 1,708 43,560 Net (29,863) (37,946) City Sales Tax: total $114,240 through the end of August. That’s up $14,896 for the same period last year and up $8,566 compared to last August.

of 2

City Funds total $2,749,105 through the end of August. That’s up $199,423 for the same period last year and down $20,204 from last month. [This is the tool I use to keep track of the funds we have in the bank. I use this spreadsheet to not only keep track of our short term financial stability, but also the long term fiscal sustainability. Fiscal sustainability strategies build the capability of a government to consistently meet its financial responsibilities, both in the short term by adjusting spending to revenues and revenues to spending, and in the long term by protecting future capital improvement plans and future generations of fiscal abilities.] Budget Fund Balances: Budget fund balances are provided to us once a year after our audit. Please let me know if you’d like to see the spreadsheets &/or audits.

2018 Proposed Budget 9/29/2017

1 GENERAL FUND 2016 2017 2017 20182 Revenues Actual Proposed Revised-8 Proposed3 General Property Tax 1410.10 82,507 85,000 87,000 90,000 4 Delinquent Taxes 1410.20 105 - - - 5 Delinquent Interest 1410.30 383 300 300 400 6 Specific Ownership Tax 1410.50 7,639 8,000 8,000 8,000 7 1/2 City Sales Tax 1410.61 118,412 100,000 100,000 120,000 8 County Sales Tax 1410.62 165,791 140,000 140,000 160,000 9 Franchise Tax 1410.80 29,509 25,000 55,000 55,000

P & R Program Fees 1420.11 370 1Donations 1420.12 - 1Gym Income other 1420.20 800 1Gym Program Fees 1420.21 20,000 1Gym Rental & Lease 1420.22 1,500 1Gym Donations 1420.24 700 1Misc. Activities 1420.30 4,000 1

14 Liquor Licenses 1440.30 3,438 5,000 4,000 4,000 15 Building Permits 1440.40 4,494 5,000 10,000 5,000 16 Building Use Tax 1440.50 7,608 8,000 11,000 9,000 17 Highway User's Tax 1450.10 20,877 20,000 20,000 20,000 18 Motor Vehicle Sales Tax 1450.20 794 200 200 5,000 19 Cigarette Tax 1450.30 1,168 1,200 1,200 1,200 20 Motor Vehicle Fees 1450.40 3,060 2,500 2,500 3,000 21 Severance Tax 1450.50 6,397 6,000 - - 22 Mineral Lease Royalty 1450.60 231 200 - - 23 Road and Bridge 1450.70 4,003 4,000 4,035 4,000 24 Fuel Tax Refund 1450.80 323 300 300 300 25 Grants 1450.90 - - - 26 Court Fines 1460.00 - - - 27 Interest Income 1470.00 1,585 900 7,000 7,000 29 Recreation Fees 1480.10 6,818 8,000 100 131 Recreation Donations 1480.30 1,262 500 - 135 Miscellaneous 1490.90 25,505 20,000 25,000 25,000 36

37 Operating Revenues 491,909 440,100 503,005 516,900

39 Expenses Actual Proposed Revised Proposed40 Administrative Salaries 1510.10 51,002 56,000 56,000 59,000 41 Payroll Taxes 1510.21 4,039 4,500 4,500 4,800 42 Benefits 1510.23 10,542 11,000 11,000 11,550 43 Operating Supplies 1510.31 2,834 4,000 4,000 4,000 44 Postage 1510.32 284 500 500 500 45 Telephone 1510.33 2,517 3,000 3,000 3,000 46 Dues & Subscriptions 1510.34 190 3,000 3,000 3,000 47 Printing & Advertising 1510.35 1,281 1,500 1,500 1,500 48 Donations 1510.36 5,000 5,000 5,000 49 Building & Plant 1510.40 896 2,000 2,000 2,000 50 Insurance & Bonds 1510.50 6,997 10,800 10,800 5,000 51 Professional Services 1510.60 45,942 35,000 30,000 30,000

1 of 5


52 Training [Travel-Lodging-Fees] 1510.70 883 2,000 1,000 1,000 53 Board of Trustees 1511.00 18,352 18,353 18,353 18,353 54 Judicial 1512.00 - - - 2,000 55 Elections 1513.00 1,295 - 3,000 3,000 56 Treasurers Fees 1514.00 1,660 2,500 2,500 2,500 57 Miscellaneous (+1519) 1519.00 8,879 10,000 10,000 10,000 58 Emergency Management 1520.50 10,000 - - - 59 CMAC ???? - 2,000 2,000 2,000

60 2016 2017 2017 201861 PUBLIC WORKS Actual Proposed Revised Proposed62 Public Works Payroll 1530.10 52,287 70,500 75,000 57,600 263 Payroll Taxes 1530.21 4,155 6,000 6,000 4,570 264 Benefits 1530.23 15,089 16,500 16,500 16,500 65 Operating Expenses 1530.31 3,672 5,000 6,100 6,405 67 Telephone 1530.33 682 1,000 1,000 1,100 68 Repairs & Maintenance 1530.40 1,354 5,000 5,000 5,250 69 Insurance & Bonds 1530.50 6,292 6,500 6,500 5,000 70 Streets & Alleys 1530.70 15,034 20,000 25,000 25,000 71 Cat Lease 1530.71 15,510 24,000 24,000 24,000 72 Electricity 1530.81 14,434 17,000 17,000 17,000 73 Propane 1530.82 1,892 7,000 7,000 7,000 74 Miscellaneous 1530.90 20 5,000 5,000 5,000

75 Parks & Recreation76 Custodial Payroll 1540.10 13,694 - - 18,000 277 Custodial Taxes 1540.21 1,077 - - 1,000 2

Park Supplies/Misc. 1540.50 16,525 15,000 87,000 15,000 3Recreation Other 1550.00 - 1Recreation Salaries 1550.10 44,157 1Recreation Taxes 1550.21 3,600 1Recreation Benefits 1550.23 10,000 1Recreation Expenses 1550.30 16,000 1

78 Recreation Salaries 1580.10 28,439 44,000 179 Recreation Taxes 1580.21 2,229 3,000 180 Recreation Benefits 1580.23 3,155 9,000 181 Recreation Supplies + 1550.30 1580.50 6,348 15,000 182 Gym Utilities 1550.41 15,173 16,000 16,000 183 Gym Miscellaneous 1550.42 10,435 12,000 5,000 190 Donations 1580.60 - - - 91 Hatchery Utilities 1580.80 - - - 92 Operating Expenses 395,089 468,653 544,010 376,628 93

94 Operating Income/Loss95 Operating Revenues 491,909 440,100 503,005 516,900 96 Operating Expenses 395,089 468,653 544,010 376,628 97 Operating Income/Loss 96,820 (28,553) (41,005) 140,272 98

99 GENERAL FUND (Cont.)100 Non-Operating101 Transfer In [Parks -from VC] 1498.00 16,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 102 Transfer in [Recreation - from VC] 1499.00 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 104 Non-Operating Revenues 54,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

2 of 5


105

106 Transfer Out (to CI) 1598.20 - - - - 107 Non-Operating Expenses - - - - 109

110 Total Revenues 545,909 490,100 553,005 566,900 111 Total Expenses 395,089 468,653 544,010 376,628 112 Net Income/Loss 150,820 21,447 8,995 190,272 113 Fund Balance Beginning of Year 1,067,446 1,218,266 1,218,266 1,218,266 114 Fund Balance End of Year 1,218,266 1,239,713 1,227,261 1,408,538

115 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 2016 2017 2017 2018116 Revenues Actual Proposed Revised Proposed117 1/2 City Sales Tax 2410.00 118,438 100,000 100,000 120,000 118 Interest 2470.00 1,614 1,500 3,500 3,500 119 Total Revenues 120,052 101,500 103,500 123,500 120

121 Expenses122 Capital Improvements 2510.00 64,903 75,000 75,000 75,000 123 New Gazebo - 20,000 20,000 20,000 3124 Flume Repair - PER 2501.00 - 465,000 10,000 465,000 125 Total Expenses 64,903 560,000 105,000 560,000 126

127 Operating Revenues 120,052 101,500 103,500 123,500 128 Operating Expenses 64,903 560,000 105,000 560,000 129 Operating Income/Loss 55,149 (458,500) (1,500) (436,500) 130

131 Non-Operating132 Transfer in (VC) 2420.00 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 133 Transfer from Fund Balance + Grants 2497.00 - 465,000 - 465,000 134 Non-Operating Revenues 40,000 505,000 40,000 505,000 135

136 Total Revenues 160,052 606,500 143,500 628,500 137 Total Expenses 64,903 560,000 105,000 560,000 138 Net Income/Loss 95,149 46,500 38,500 68,500 139 Fund Balance Beginning of Year 568,511 663,660 663,660 663,660 140 Fund Balance End of Year 663,660 710,160 702,160 732,160 141

142 VIRGINIA CHRISTENSEN 2016 2017 2017 2018143 Revenues Actual Proposed Revised Proposed144 Required Minimum Distribution 8460.00 74,508 184,000 75,000 75,000 145 Market Adjust / Interest 8470.00 98,523 - 98,000 98,000 146 Operating Revenues 173,031 184,000 173,000 173,000 147 Expenses148 Distributions 8510.00 52,856 70,000 87,749 70,000 149 Management Fee - - - - 150 Operating Expenses 52,856 70,000 87,749 70,000 151

152 Operating Revenues 173,031 184,000 173,000 173,000 153 Operating Expenses 52,856 70,000 87,749 70,000 154 Operating Income/Loss 120,175 114,000 85,251 103,000 156

157 Transfer to Capital Improvement 8520.00 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 3 of 5


158 Transfer to Parks 8540.00 16,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 159 Transfer to Arts & Recreation 8550.00 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 160 Transfer to Activities - - - 161 Non-Operating Expenses 94,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 162

163 Total Revenues 173,031 184,000 173,000 173,000 164 Total Expenses 146,856 160,000 177,749 160,000 165 Net Income/Loss 26,175 24,000 (4,749) 13,000 166 Fund Balance Beginning of Year 4,139,139 4,165,314 4,165,314 4,165,314 167 Fund Balance End of Year 4,165,314 4,189,314 4,160,565 4,178,314

168 CONSERVATION TRUST 2016 2017 2017 2018169 Revenues Actual Proposed Revised Proposed170 Lottery Funds 3410.00 3,167 2,600 2,100 2,500 171 Interest 3470.00 27 35 12 15 172 Operating Revenues 3,194 2,635 2,112 2,515 173

174 EXPENDITURES:175 Park 3500.40 - 10,000 10,000 10,000 3176 Operating Expenses - 10,000 10,000 10,000 177

183 Total Revenues 3,194 2,635 2,112 2,515 184 Total Expenses - 10,000 10,000 10,000 185 Net Income/Loss 3,194 (7,365) (7,888) (7,485) 186 Fund Balance Beginning of Year 12,282 15,476 15,476 15,476 187 Fund Balance End of Year 15,476 8,111 7,588 7,991

188 WATER AND SEWER 2016 2017 2017 2018189 Revenues Actual Proposed Revised Proposed190 Water Lease 6405.00 - - - - 191 Water Revenues 6410.00 190,086 195,000 193,000 199,000 192 Sewer Revenues 6420.00 88,523 91,000 92,500 95,500 193 Drainage Revenues 6440.00 6,950 8,000 8,300 8,500 194 Miscellaneous 6450.00 9,011 6,000 12,000 13,000 195 W/S Finance Charge 6460.00 2,859 2,500 2,800 3,000 196 Water Meters 6480.00 2,550 4,000 100 3,000 197 OPERATING REVENUES 299,979 306,500 308,700 322,000 198

199 Expenses200 W/S Administrative Salaries 6500.11 51,005 56,000 56,000 58,800 201 W/S Salaries 6500.12 52,287 55,000 55,000 55,000 202 Taxes 6500.21 8,200 8,900 8,800 8,800 203 Benefits 6500.23 25,538 25,500 26,000 26,500 204 Office Supplies 6500.31 853 1,500 1,500 1,500 205 Postage 6500.32 1,040 1,500 1,500 1,500 206 Telephone 6500.33 683 800 800 800 207 Sewer Supplies 6500.35 3,264 3,000 3,000 4,000 208 Water Supplies (& meters) 6500.36 9,770 7,000 7,700 8,000 209 Repair & Maintenance 6500.41 3,976 6,500 2,500 5,000 210 Sewer Testing 6500.42 14,519 13,500 16,000 16,000 211 Water Testing 6500.43 1,791 3,000 2,000 2,500 212 Insurance 6500.50 6,292 6,900 6,500 10,000 213 Professional Services 6500.60 12,610 14,000 10,000 15,000

4 of 5


214 Travel 6500.70 889 250 - 300 215 Electricity - Sewer Plant 6500.81 10,916 13,000 13,000 13,000 216 Propane - Water Plant 6500.85 471 1,500 1,500 1,500 217 Electricity - Water Plant 6500.86 33,229 36,000 36,000 36,000 218 Capital Improvements 6540.00 - - - 219 Sewer Miscellaneous 6500.91 2,690 4,000 2,000 3,000 220 Water Miscellaneous 6500.92 1,458 3,000 3,000 2,000 221 Miscellaneous/Contingency 6500.93 3,314 5,000 5,000 5,000 222 OPERATING EXPENSES 244,795 265,850 257,800 274,200 223

224 Operating Revenues 299,979 306,500 308,700 322,000 225 Operating Expenses 244,795 265,850 257,800 274,200 226 Operating Income/Loss 55,184 40,650 50,900 47,800 227

228 NON-OPERATING:229 Capital Contributions (Tap SD fees) 6430.00 19,946 24,000 25,100 20,000 231 Interest Income 6470.00 236 100 500 500 232 Non-Operating Revenues 20,182 24,100 25,600 20,500 233

234 Transfers out (Capital Improvement) 6495.00235 Loans Principal 6515+6.2 38,595 40,000 38,000 38,000 236 Loans Interest 6515+6.1 19,947 23,000 21,000 21,000 237 Non-Operating Expenses 58,542 63,000 59,000 59,000 238

239

240 Total Revenues 320,161 330,600 334,300 342,500 241 Total Expenses 303,337 328,850 316,800 333,200 242 Net Income/Loss 16,824 1,750 17,500 9,300 243 Fund Balance Beginning of Year 586,354 603,178 603,178 60,317 244 Fund Balance End of Year 603,178 604,928 620,678 69,617

1 Acct #'s mixed up2 Custodial in PW this year3 Park Expenses spread out

5 of 5

2017 Acct. No. 1/31/17 2/28/17 3/31/17 4/30/17 5/31/17 6/30/17 7/31/17 8/31/17 9/31/17 10/31/17 11/30/17 12/31/171 ColoTrust 548001 275,920 276,113 276,333 276,561 276,805 277,053 277,323 277,606 2 Conservation Trust xx5357 15,477 16,159 16,158 16,159 16,159 16,869 16,869 16,870 3 Capital Improvement xx21337 658,586 659,595 669,241 663,570 718,476 711,831 747,702 699,282 4 WS Checking xx5350 407,880 411,594 391,197 414,178 423,291 431,301 432,982 422,755 5 WS Savings 108894 22,257 22,257 22,965 22,965 22,965 24,013 24,013 24,013 6 Deep Creek (Res) xx21343 73,900 73,908 76,668 76,676 76,687 76,696 76,706 79,466 7 Virginia Christensen x21340 398,807 388,815 387,165 387,400 227,494 227,550 227,608 227,666 8 WS 2% Savings x21346 54,000 54,951 54,938 55,420 55,902 56,383 56,866 57,351 10 GF High Yield xx21334 843,823 807,069 844,729 841,985 920,844 890,044 888,650 885,790 11 Gen. Fund Checking xx5343 54,048 118,299 (28,496) 9,325 29,673 80,572 20,590 58,306

Total Funds 2,804,698 2,828,760 2,710,898 2,764,239 2,768,296 2,792,312 2,769,309 2,749,105 - - - -

and down $20,204 (2,749,105 - 2,769,309) from last month

Begining Ending2004 446,511 558,464 111,953 2005 558,464 656,467 98,003 2006 656,467 892,639 236,172 2007 892,639 1,008,282 115,643 2008 1,008,282 1,023,796 15,514 2009 1,023,796 1,277,112 253,316 2010 1,277,112 1,497,354 220,242 2011 1,497,354 1,680,710 183,356 2012 1,680,710 1,368,684 (312,026) Paving2013 1,368,684 1,717,812 349,128 2014 1,717,812 2,181,149 463,337 2015 2,181,149 2,498,316 317,167 2016 2,498,316 2,811,090 312,774 2017 2,811,090 2,749,105 (61,985)

2,302,594

446,511 2,749,105

Performance Up 616%

City funds are up $199,423 (2,749,105 - 2,549,682) for the same period last year

2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003

Jan 10,422 8,462 10,214 6,754 7,330 8,814 5,450 6,784 6,726 6,822 11,116 7,728 6,598 5,966 5,012 Feb 10,786 8,144 9,266 10,564 9,102 7,926 8,740 7,028 9,018 9,034 7,682 6,476 7,562 7,598 6,172 Mar 9,332 9,350 6,674 8,114 6,480 6,868 4,832 4,498 7,700 7,454 4,482 4,836 6,100 5,392 4,086 Apr 9,714 8,494 9,430 7,696 6,730 6,838 4,314 5,888 7,804 5,158 4,714 6,624 4,748 4,264 4,172 May 10,974 12,596 6,672 7,814 7,954 6,056 6,314 4,722 4,932 5,886 5,476 4,384 5,826 5,596 4,336 Jun 9,082 9,236 9,284 7,940 6,314 10,718 4,018 4,516 5,108 5,812 4,544 5,648 4,220 4,014 5,562 Jul 17,448 15,146 15,876 16,244 13,944 14,456 10,445 9,422 9,608 12,866 9,922 11,178 8,981 8,764 8,658 Aug 36,482 27,916 28,558 26,416 25,228 35,718 23,934 22,658 21,708 21,214 19,274 15,146 19,688 18,269 16,868 Sep 53,660 46,424 34,026 32,472 47,628 33,657 37,060 35,686 31,794 32,296 29,228 27,946 30,978 25,758 Oct 38,404 32,380 45,006 30,964 32,142 31,996 24,106 23,400 24,112 23,688 20,936 20,536 19,900 22,072 Nov 28,500 27,822 24,622 28,614 33,402 25,118 21,926 23,158 19,268 19,916 20,006 17,232 19,340 21,008 Dec 12,366 11,732 11,184 11,214 10,186 10,028 7,934 6,876 10,360 9,536 6,920 7,928 6,618 6,794

114,240 232,274 214,332 206,380 186,346 220,752 168,846 156,542 161,724 159,780 152,646 139,110 137,365 136,699 130,498

2017 2016 2015Jan. 10,422 9.12% Jan. 8,462 3.64% Jan. 10,214 4.77%Feb 10,786 9.44% Feb 8,144 3.51% Feb 9,266 4.32%Mar 9,332 8.17% Mar 9,350 4.03% Mar 6,674 3.11%Apr 9,714 8.50% Apr 8,494 3.66% Apr 9,430 4.40%May 10,974 9.61% May 12,596 5.42% May 6,672 3.11%Jun 9,082 7.95% 52.79% Jun 9,236 3.98% 24.23% Jun 9,284 4.33% 24.05%Jul 17,448 15.27% Jul 15,146 6.52% Jul 15,876 7.41%Aug 36,482 31.93% Aug 27,916 12.02% Aug 28,558 13.32%Sep 0.00% Sep 53,660 23.10% Sep 46,424 21.66%Oct 0.00% Oct 38,404 16.53% Oct 32,380 15.11%Nov 0.00% Nov 28,500 12.27% Nov 27,822 12.98%Dec 0.00% 47.21% Dec 12,366 5.32% 75.77% Dec 11,732 5.47% 75.95%

114,240 100.00% 232,274 100.00% 214,332 100.00%

City sales tax is up $14,896 (114,240 - 99,344) for the same period last yearand up $8,566 (36,482 - 27,916) compared to last August