City of Aliso Viejo pF ALISpG-

Agenda Item

kipIll qui

DATE: May 15, 20194`

c.itiFoR '•

TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Shaun Pelletier, City Engineer

SUBJECT: PRIMA FACIE CITYWIDE SPEED LIMITS — ORDINANCE

Recommended Actions:

1. Find that this Ordinance is subject to CEQA categorical exemption Class 1

pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, respectively, Title 14, California Code ofRegulations Sections 15301; and

2. Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo, California,Amending the Aliso Viejo Municipal Code Declaring Prima Facie Speed Limits onCertain City Streets.

Fiscal Impact:

The only fiscal impact resulting from this ordinance is the cost of replacing speed limitsigns which will be approximately $ 1, 000.

Background:

The California Vehicle Code is specific in its mandate for the performance of

engineering and traffic surveys in regard to speed limits. In particular, Chapter 7 of theState Vehicle Code provides that " prima facie" speed limits established under Sections

22352, 22354, 22354. 5, 22357, 22358, 22358. 3 may not be enforced by radar unlessthe speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last fiveyears. All local agencies must conduct engineering and traffic surveys to provide thefollowing:

1. Raise State dictated " prima facie" limits above 25 miles per hour;2. Lower the otherwise permitted maximum speed of 65 miles per hour; and

3. Enforce speed limits by the use of radar equipment.

The City Council must adopt the results of the engineering and traffic study and mustprovide copies of the study to anyone who requests them.

Aliso Viejo City Council most recently adopted speed limits on City streets by ordinanceon January 16, 2013.

Agenda Item 7-1

Section 22350 is the basis of all speed zone legislation in that it states, "No person shall

drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent..."considering external conditions such as road conditions, weather, and other traffic.Secondly, the Vehicle Code has established certain " prima facie" speed limits ( Section22352), which may not be exceeded unless the operator of a motor vehicle can provethat it is safe to do so under the Basic Speed Law. Specifically, these prima facie limitsare:

1. 15 miles per hour in traversing a railroad grade crossing;2. 15 miles per hour in an alley;3. 15 miles per hour at an uncontrolled intersection with restricted sight distances;

4. 25 miles per hour in business or residence districts;

5. 25 miles per hour in school zones when children are present; and

6. 25 miles per hour when passing a senior center.

The local agency may reduce the standard 25 mile-per-hour school speed zonesbetween 20 and 15 miles per hour, if justified by an engineering and traffic studySection 22358.4), but in no event may it be raised above 25 miles per hour.

Additionally, the local agency may raise speed limits in business and residence districtsto 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 or 65 miles per hour, if justified by an engineering andtraffic survey. Finally, all other speed limits are set by an engineering and traffic studywhich determines the " reasonable and prudent" speeds at which the majority of driverstraverse a given street.

The recommended..posted speed limits are based on CA MUTCD Section 2B. 13 which

states: "When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mphincrement of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the twoOptions below:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from, the\ nearest 5 mph incrementof the 85th- oercentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.3.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed

would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the.nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductionis used."

Discussion:

Staff along with Police Services is recommending adoption of these engineeringand traffic surveys in advance of their expiration date of 1/ 16/20. The speedsurveys were conducted by RK Engineering under contract to the City. In

conducting those speed surveys, vehicle speeds were measured in the field using aspeed- measuring device that had been properly calibrated according to theCalifornia Department of Transportation ( CALTRANS) Traffic Manual. In addition,

the operator of the speed- measuring device was properly trained and operatedunder the direct supervision of a California Licensed Professional Engineer. In all

cases, the City Engineer reviewed and determined that the speed surveys are valid.

Agenda Item 7-2

The existing speed limit, recommended speed limit, 85th and 50th percentile speeds,and 10 mph pace speeds for each segment of roadway studied are shown in Table1. Collision rates for these segments are shown in Table 2.

Three ( 3) existing speed limits are recommended to be raised 5 mph by adoption ofthis ordinance.

1. Eastwing — 35 to 40 mph2. Hopseed —25 to 30 mph

3. Pacific Park Drive (Aliso Viejo Parkway to Alicia) —45 to 50 mph

It should be noted that all allowed rounding reductions were utilized so any furtherreductions would make the posted speed invalid in a court of law. A court could also

rule the City has knowingly created an unlawful speed trap which could bring uponpenalties and unnecessary liability.

There is one ( 1) segment recommended to be reduced from current posted speeds

by 5 mph based upon the measured 85th percentile speeds.

1. Enterprise ( Pacific Park to Aliso Viejo Parkway) —40 to 35 mph

The complete engineering and traffic surveys are available at City Hall.

APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL

un S. Pelletier

City Engineer

David A. r. le

City Manager

Attachments: Table 1 — Speed Survey SummaryTable 2 — 3-Year Collision Rates

Ordinance 2019-XXX

Agenda Item 7-3

ORDINANCE NO. 2019-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL .OF THE CITY OF ALISO

VIEJO CALIFORNIA, DECLARING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN CITY STREETS.

WHEREAS, the City' s arterial, collector and local roadways are intended for thesafe movement of motor vehicles; and

WHEREAS, Sections 22352, 22354, 22354.5, 22357, 22358, 22358.3 of the

California Vehicle Code ( CVC) establish prima facie speed limits on all the roadways inthe State; and

WHEREAS, Sections 22352, 22354, 22354.5, 22357, 22358, 22358.3 of the

California Vehicle Code ( CVC) allows local agencies to post speed limits on city streetswhich are less than prima facie speed limits after completion of an engineering and trafficsurvey; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo last established by ordinanceprima facie speed limits on City roadways in 2013; and

WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic studies used to determine prima faciespeed limits have been recently updated per the CVC, and

WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby approve the revised prima facie speedlimits on certain City streets.

WHEREAS, this Ordinance is subject to CEQA categorical exemption Class 1

pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, respectively, Title 14, California Code of RegulationsSection 15301.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJOORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Declaring prima facie speed limits for the following streets:

Street Section Prima Facie

Speed

mph)

Alicia Parkway City Limits to SR 73 50

Alicia Parkway SR 73 to Pacific Park Dr 50

Aliso Creek Road Alicia Pkwy to Aliso Viejo Pkwy (S) 50

Aliso Creek Road Aliso Viejo Pkwy (S) to Pacific Park Dr 50

Aliso Creek Road Pacific Park Dr to Glenwood Dr 50

Aliso Creek Road Glenwood Dr to El Toro Road 50

Aliso Viejo Parkway Moulton Pkwy to Aliso Creek Rd ( N) 50

Agenda Item 7-4

Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Creek Rd ( N) to Enterprise 50

Aliso Viejo Parkway Enterprise to Aliso Creek Rd ( S) 50

Autumnglen Aliso Creek Rd to Summerfield 30

Boundary Oak Wood Canyon to Pacific Grove 35

Canyon Vista Pacific Park Dr to Silkwood 35

Canyon Wren Westwing to El Toro Road 35

Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr to Da Vinci 30

Cedarbrook Glenwood Dr to Aliso Viejo Pkwy 35

Cedarbrook Aliso Viejo Pkwy to Park 35

Chase Pacific Park Dr to Thistledown 35

City Lights Pacific Park Dr to Grand 35

Columbia Aliso Creek Rd to Aliso Viejo Pkwy 35

Da Vinci Glenwood Dr to Cedarbrook 30

Deerhurst Pacific Park Dr to Wolverine Way 35

Eastwind Briarglen to Amber 30

Eastwing Westwing to Aliso Creek Rd 40

Enterprise Pacific Park Dr to Aliso Viejo Pkwy 35

Enterprise Aliso Viejo Pkwy to Aliso Creek Rd 40

Glenwood Dr - Moulton Pkwy to Aliso Creek Rd 50

Glenwood Dr Aliso Creek Rd to Enterprise 50

Hollyoak Alicia Pkwy to Laurelmont 25

Hopseed Wood Vista to Hollyleaf 30

Journey Pacific Park Dr to Aliso Creek Rd 35

La Paz Road Pacific Park Dr to SR 73 45

Laurelmont Alicia Pkwy to Hollyoak 25

Liberty Aliso Viejo Pkwy to Alicia Pkwy 45

Oakgrove Pacific Park Dr to Wood Canyon 35

Oakview Westridge to Wood Canyon 35

Pacific Park Dr Enterprise to Chase 50

Pacific Park Dr Chase to Aliso Viejo Pkwy 50

Pacific Park Dr Aliso Viejo Pkwy to Alicia Pkwy 50

Pacific Park Dr Alicia Pkwy to Mareblu 45

Peppertree Pacific Park Dr to Knuckle curve 35

Pursuit Liberty to Curve 35

Pursuit Curve to Aliso Creek Rd 35

Sanborn Chase to Wood Canyon 25

Summerfield Aliso Creek Rd to Autumnglen 30

Via Iglesia Moulton Pkwy to Cul-de-sac 25

Westwing Calle Corta to Aliso Creek Rd 35

Westwing Aliso Creek Rd to Eastwing 35

Windsong Aliso Creek Rd to Cedarbrook 30

Wolverine Way Aliso Creek Rd to Cul- de-sac 35

Wood Canyon Thistledown to Grand 35

Wood Canyon Grand to Pacific Park Dr 35

Wood Canyon Pacific Park Dr to Boundary Oak 50

Agenda Item 7-5

Wood Canyon Boundary Oak to Calypso 50

Wood Canyon Knollwood to Hope 45

Wood Vista Hopseed to Canyon Vista 35

SECTION 2. The Public Works Department is hereby authorized and directed to ,install and/ or upgrade any or all immediately appropriate signs giving notice of said speedlimits.

SECTION 6. This Ordinance, is enacted to update prima facie speed limits on

existing streets. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that adoption of this Ordinancewill not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and is therefore exempt fromCalifornia Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301( c) of the_ CEQAGuidelines.

SECTION 3. This Ordinance No. 2019-XXX shall become effective when

appropriate signs giving notice of the new speed limit are posted upon the street affectedby this ordinance.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shallcause the same to be published as required by law.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this _ day of 2019.

Ross Chun

Mayor

ATTEST:

Mitzi Ortiz

City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Best Best & Krieger LLP

City Attorney

Agenda Item 7-6

Table 1

City of Aliso Viejo 2019 Engineering& Traffic Survey

Speed Survey Summary

Existing 85th 50th 10 mph Percent Reason for

Speed Recommended Percentile Percentile Pace within 10 Adjustment from

Loc. Limit Speed Limit Speed Speed Speed mph Pace 85th Percentile

No. Roadway Segment MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) Speed Speed'

Alicia Parkway1 City limits to SR- 73 50 50 54 51 46- 55 86% 5, 7, 14

2 SR- 73 to Pacific Park Dr. 50 50 52 48 45- 54 83%

Aliso Creek Road

3 Alicia Pkwy. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy.( South) 50 50 53 49 46-55 81% 5, 14

4 Aliso Viejo Pkwy.( South) to Pacific Park Dr. 50 50 53 49 45-54 79% 5, 14

5 Pacific Park Dr. to Glenwood Dr. 50 50 52 48 44- 53 84%

6 Glenwood Dr. to El Toro Rd. 50 50 53 49 _ 45-54 81% 5, 14

Aliso Viejo Parkway7 Moulton Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd.( North) 50 50 55 51 47- 56 79% 5, 7, 14

8 Aliso Creek Rd.( North) to Enterprise 50 50 51 47 43- 52 84%

9 Enterprise to Aliso Creek Rd.( South) 50 50 53 49 45- 54 81% 5, 14

Autumnglen

10 Aliso Creek Rd. to Summerfield 30 30 33 29 25- 34 88% 1, 3, 5, 6, 14

Boundary Oak11 Wood Canyon Dr. to Pacific Grow Dr. 35 35 38 34 - 31- 40 77% 5, 9, 14

Canyon Vistas

12 Pacific Park Dr. to Silkwood 35 35 36 32 _ 29-38 88%

Canyon Wren Lane

13 Westwinq to El Toro Rd. 35 35 39 35 32- 41 82% 5, 14

Cedarbrook

14 Glenwood Dr. to Da Vinci 30 30 34 30 26-35 73% 3, 5, 6, 14

15 Glenwood Dr. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 35 35 36 33 29-38 79%

16 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Park 35 35 38 34 31- 40 88% 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14

Chase

17 Pacific Park Dr. to Thistledown 35 35 33 30 26-35 84%

City Lights Drive18 Pacific Park Dr. to Grand 35 35 40 36 32-41 85% 3, 4, 5, 14

Columbia

19 Aliso Creek Rd. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 35 35 37 35 31- 40 93%

Da Vinci

20 Glenwood Dr. to Cedarbrook 30 30 33 29 25-34 79% 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14

Deerhurst

21 Pacific Park Dr. to Wolverine W. 35 35 38 34 ' 31- 40 83% 5, 6, 12, 14

Eastwind

22 Briarqlen to Amber 30 30 35 28i

23-32 69% 3, 5, 6, 14

Eastwing23 Westwing to Aliso Creek Rd. 35 43 39 - 35- 44 72% 5, 6, 9, 14

Enterprise

24 Pacific Park Dr. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 40 37 33 31- 40 91%

25 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 40 40 42 39 37-46 88%

Glenwood Drive

26 Moulton Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 50 50 51 48 45-54 87%

27 Aliso Creek Rd. to Enterprise 50 50 55 50 48-57 86% 7, 14

Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. High accident rate conditions 8. Roadway geometria such as alignment changes, horizontal curves,2. Direct residential access with pedestrian activity railroad crossings, and potential obstructions limiting visibility3. Residential area with pedestrian activity 9. Vicinity to activity area such as park, community center, or hospital4. Commercial area with pedestrian activity and access 10. Lack of sidewalks

5. 10 mph pace speed 11. Open drainage channel

6. On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts 12. Vicinity to school7. Consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit 13. Change due to existing measured 85th percentile trawl speeds

14. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed

would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to thenearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction isused. Refer to CVC Section 21400(h).

Recommended speed limit higher than existing speed limit

Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit

j:r*tabks/RK15/ 82TB Ws1012259.2018-02

Agenda Item 7-7

Table 1( Continued)

City of Aliso Viejo 2019 Engineering& Traffic Survey

Speed Survey Summary

Existing 85th 50th 10 mph Percent Reason for

Speed Recommended Percentile Percentile Pace within 10 Adjustment from

Loc. Limit Speed Limit Speed Speed Speed mph Pace 85th Percentile

No. Roadway Segment MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) ( MPH) Speed Speed`

Hollyaak

28 Alicia Pkwy. to laurelmont 25 25 29 26 22- 31 85% 1, 3, 5, 6, 14

Hopseed

29 Wood Vista Way to HolMeaf 25 35 29 24- 33 68% 3, 5, 14

Journey30 Pacific Park Dr. to Aliso Creek Rd. 35 35 36 32 29- 38 76%

La Paz Road

31 Pacific Park Dr. to SR- 73 45 45 51 45 40-49 73% 5, 14

Laurelmont

32 Alicia Pkwy. to Hollyoak 25 25 31 26 24- 33 76% 3, 6, 14

Liberty33 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 45 45 46 41 38-47 77%

Oakgrove

34 Pacific Grove Dr. to Wood Canyon Dr.( North) 35 35 41 36 33-42 71% 7, 14

Oak View Drive

35 Westridqe Dr. to Wood Canyon Dr. 35 35 40 36 32- 41 75% 5, 7, 12, 14

Pacific Park Drive

36 Enterprise to Chase 50 _ 50 54 50 48- 57 83% 5, 14

37 Chase to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 50 50 1 57 52 48- 57 74% 14

38 Viso Viejo Pkwy. to Alicia Pkwy. 45 4111 51 48 45- 54 85% 5, 7

39 Alicia Pkwy. to Mareblu 45 45 47 43 40- 49 81%

Peppertree

40 Pacific Park Dr. to knuckle curve 35 35 34 30 26-35 81%

Pursuit

41 Liberty to curve 35 35 36 33 28- 37 83%

42 Curve to Viso Creek Rd. 35 35 38 34 31- 40 82% 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14

Sanborn

43 Chase to Wood Canyon Dr. 25 25 31 27 23- 32 84% 3, 6, 12, 14

Summerfield

44 Aliso Creek Rd. to Autumnglen 30 30 32 29 26-35 91%

Via Iglesia

45 Moulton Pkwy. to cul-de-sac 25 25 30 26 23- 32 82% 1, 3, 6, 9, 14

Westwing46 Calle Corta to Aliso Creek Rd. 35 35 39 35 31- 40 83% _ 5, 7, 14

47 Aliso Creek Rd. to Eastwing 35 35 36 33 29- 38 75%

Windsong48 Aliso Creek Rd. to Cedarbrook 30 30 33 30 27- 36 97% 5, 6, 14

Wolverine Way49 Aliso Creek Rd. to cul- de-sac 35 35 36 33 29-38 95%

Wood Canyon Drive

50 Thistledown to Grand 35 35 36 32 29-38 82%

51 Grand to Pacific Park Dr. 35 35 38 35 30-39 82% 5, 7, 12, 14

52 Pacific Park Dr. to Boundary Oak 50 50 51 47 43- 52 73%

53 Boundary Oak to Calypso St. 50 50 52 47 45- 54 74%

54 Knollwood to Hope St. 45 45 49 45 41- 50 87% 5, 9, 12, 14

Wood Vista Way55 Hopseed to Canyon Vistas 35 35 34 30 27-36 82%

Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. High accident rate conditions 8. Roadway geometrics such as alignment changes, horizontal curves,2. Direct residential access with pedestrian activity railroad crossings, and potential obstructions limiting visibility3. Residential area with pedestrian activity 9. Vicinity to activity area such as park, community center, or hospital4. Commercial area with pedestrian activity and access 10. Lack of sidewalks

5. 10 mph pace speed 11. Open drainage channel

6. On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts 12. Vicinity to school7. Consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit 13. Change due to existing measured 85th percentile travel speeds

14. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed

would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to thenearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is

used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(6).

Recommended speed limit higher than existing speed limit

Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit

j' Mebks/RK15182T8 yds15: 2259-2018-02

Agenda Item 7-8

Table 2

City of Aliso Viejo 2019 Engineering& Traffic Survey

Three-Year Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments

Loc. Number of Number of Link Length Collision Caltrans Exceeds CaltransNo. Roadway Segment Collisions Months ( Miles) ADT' Rate' Base

Rates

Rate

Alicia Parkway1 Oty limits to SR- 73 7 38 _ 0. 3 42, 982 0.63 1. 25 No

2 SR- 73 to Pacific Park Dr. 7 38 0. 2 42, 240 1. 16 1. 25 No

Aliso Creek Road

3 Alicia Pkwy. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy.( South) 12 38 0. 8 32,368 0.44 1. 25 No

4 Aliso Viejo Pkwy.( South) to Pacific Park Dr. 6 38 0.4 23,396 0.68 1. 25 No

5 Pacific Park Dr. to Glenwood Dr. 14 38 1. 8 26, 144 0. 27 1. 41 No

6 _ Glenwood Dr. to El Toro Rd. 11 38 1. 1 26, 154 0.36 1. 41 No

Aliso Viejo Parkway7 Moulton Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd.( North) 2 38 0.4 24,955 0.21 1. 25 No

8 Aliso Creek Rd.( North) to Enterprise 3 38 0. 5 16, 160 0.38 1. 25 No

9 Enterprise to Aliso Creek Rd.( South) 0 38 1. 3 10, 951 0.00 1. 25 No

Autumnglen

10 Aliso Creek Rd. to Summerfield 1 38 0. 2 1, 177 5.93 2. 09

Boundary Oak11 _ Wood Canyon Dr. to Pacific Grove Dr. 1 38 0. 3 2, 576 1. 50 2.09 No

Canyon Vistas

12 Pacific Park Dr. to Silkwood 2 38 0. 4 2, 946 1. 81 2. 09 No

Canyon Wren Lane

13 Westwing to El Toro Rd. 0 38 0. 5 2, 263 0.00 2. 09 No

Cedarbrook

14 Glenwood Dr. to Da Vinci 0 38 0. 2 783 0.00 2. 09 No

15 Glenwood Dr. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 4 38 0. 5 1, 653 4.94 2. 09

16 _ Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Park 0 38 0. 7 3, 823 0. 00 2. 09 No

Chase

17 Pacific Park Dr. to Thistledown 2 38 0.4 3, 758 1. 42 2. 09 No

City Lights Drive18 '

tPacific Park Dr. to Grand 0 38 0. 2 4, 250 0. 00 2. 09 No

Columbia

19 Aliso Creek Rd. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 0 38 0. 2 3, 919 0. 00 2. 09 No

Da Vinci

20 , Glenwood Dr. to Cedarbrook 0 38 0. 2 1, 629 0. 00 2. 09 No

Deerhurst

21 Pacific Park Dr. to Wolverine Wy. 3 38 0. 6 5, 280 0.94 2. 09 No

Eastwind

22 Briarglen to Amber 0 38 0. 2 642 0.00 2. 09 No

Eastwing23 Westwing to Aliso Creek Rd. 0 38 0. 5 3, 048 0. 00 2. 09 No

Enterprise

24 Pacific Park Dr. to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 0 _ 38 0. 3 8,469 0.00 1. 71 No

25 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 3 38 0. 5 9, 969 0. 61 1. 71 No

Glenwood Drive

26 jMoulton Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 1 38 0. 7 13, 785 0. 10 1. 41 No _

27 Aliso Creek Rd. to Enterprise 1 38 0. 6 18,337 0. 09 1. 41 No

ADT= Average Daily Traffic

Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled( MVMT)

Based upon Collision Data on California State Highway( Caltrans)

j:rktables/ RK1518278.xhIN: 2259-201 B- 02

Agenda Item 7-9

Table 2( Continued)

City of Aliso Viejo 2019 Engineering& Traffic Survey

Three-Year Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments

Loc. Number of Number of Link Length Collision Caltrans Exceeds CaltransNo. Roadway Segment Collisions Months ( Miles) ADT' Rate' Base Rate' Rate

Hollyoak

28 Alicia Pkwy. to Laurelmont 1 38 0. 1 4,342 8. 30 2. 09

Hopseed

29 Wood Vista Way to Hollyleaf 0 38 0. 3 646 0. 00 2. 09 No

Journey30 Pacific Park Dr. to Aliso Creek Rd. 1 38 0.3 2, 453 1. S 1 2. 09 No

La Paz Road

31 Pacific Park Dr. to SR- 73 0 38 0.2 13, 246 0. 00 1. 25 No

Laurelmont

32 Alicia Pkwy. to Hollyoak 0 38 0. 2 685 0. 00 2. 09j

No

Liberty33 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Aliso Creek Rd. 2 38 0. 7 2, 465 1. 12 1. 41 No

Oakgrove

34 Pacific Grove Dr. to Wood Canyon Dr.( North) 0 38 0.6 5, 358 0. 00 2. 09 No

Oak View Drive

35 Westridqe Dr. to Wood Canyon Dr. 2 38 0. 7 1, 702 1. 63 2. 09 No

Pacific Park Drive

36 Enterprise to Chase 1 38 0.6 18,997 0. 09 1. 41 No

37 Chase to Aliso Viejo Pkwy. 2 38 0. 7 15, 246 0. 18 1. 41 No

38 Aliso Viejo Pkwy. to Alicia Pkwy. 10 38 0.9 38, 769 0. 27 1. 25 No

39 Alicia Pkwy. to Mareblu 0 38 0. 7 32, 350 0. 00 1. 25 No

Peppertree

40 Pacific Park Dr. to knuckle curve 0 38 0.3 1, 201 0. 00 2. 09 No

Pursuit

41 Liberty to curve 0 38 0.3 1, 848 0. 00 2. 09 No

42 curve to Aliso Creek Rd. 38 0.3 4,934 0. 78 2. 09 No

Sanborn

43j

Chase to Wood Canyon Dr. 1 38 0. 3 2, 015 1. 92j

2. 09 No

Summerfield

44 Aliso Creek Rd. to Autumnglen 1 38 0. 2 951 7. 34 2. 09

Via Iglesia

45 Moulton Pkwy. to cul-de- sac ll 38 0. 5 1, 308 7. 80 2. 09 MIIIMIWestwing

46 Calle Corta to Aliso Creek Rd. 1 38 _ 0.3 2, 559 1. 51 2. 09 No

47 Aliso Creek Rd. to Eastwing 0 38 0.4 1, 312 0. 00 2. 09 No

Windsong48 Aliso Creek Rd. to Cedarbrook 1 38 0.2 7,443 0. 94 2. 09 No

Wolverine Way49 Aliso Creek Rd. to cul- de-sac 5 38

j

0.3 5,818 3. 32 2. 09

Wood Canyon Drive

50 Thistledown to Grand 4 38 0.3 5,358 2. 88 2. 09

51 Grand to Pacific Park Dr. 1 38 0.3 4,792 0. 81 2. 09 No

52 Pacific Park Dr. to Boundary Oak 1 38 0.6 6, 505 0. 25 1. 68 No

53 Boundary Oak to Calypso St. 0 38 0.2 7, 132 0. 00 1. 41 No

54 Knollwood to Hope St. 4 38 0.9 8,403 0. 50 1. 11 • No

Wood Vista Way55 Hopseed to Canyon Vistas 0 38 0. 1 2, 451 0. 00 2. 09 No

ADT= Average Daily Traffic

Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled( MVMT)

Based upon Collision Data on California State Highway( Caltrans)

rhtables/RK75182Tax6

IN: 2259-2018-02

Agenda Item 7-10