cirtl event grids summary of findings rique campa & justin micomonaco cirtl network meeting...
TRANSCRIPT
CIRTL Event CIRTL Event GridsGrids
Summary of Summary of Findings Findings Rique Campa & Justin Rique Campa & Justin
MicomonacoMicomonacoCIRTL Network MeetingCIRTL Network Meeting
Tuesday October 27, 2009Tuesday October 27, 2009
OverviewOverview
Review processReview process
Course-related findingsCourse-related findings
Broader program-related Broader program-related findingsfindings
Implications for institutionsImplications for institutions
Implications for NetworkImplications for Network
Process-Spring, 2009 Process-Spring, 2009
Course-Related Course-Related FindingsFindings
Mapped each institution’s CIRTL Mapped each institution’s CIRTL courses on to comprehensive gridcourses on to comprehensive grid
Help identify strengths and gaps Help identify strengths and gaps across Networkacross Network
SS PP FF
ScholarScholarPractitionePractitionerrFellowFellow
Outcomes:Outcomes:
EARLY MIDDLE LATE
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LT
DA
LC
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
LO
WM
ED
IUM
HIG
H
FFSS PP FFSS PP FFSS PP FFSS PPFFSS PP FFSS PPCU-
BoulderMSU Howard UW-
MadisonTAMU Vanderbi
lt
Course-related Course-related FindingsFindings
No courses at low engagement levelNo courses at low engagement level Gap in high engagement courses for Gap in high engagement courses for
students at later stages of careersstudents at later stages of careers Most one-time courses are classified as Most one-time courses are classified as
Fellow-level, and Medium engagementFellow-level, and Medium engagement
Expanded analysis to all programs Expanded analysis to all programs reported in institutional grids:reported in institutional grids: Courses alone don’t tell the whole storyCourses alone don’t tell the whole story Courses don’t seem to be the primary mode of Courses don’t seem to be the primary mode of
programming across the Networkprogramming across the Network Courses tended to have the most limited Courses tended to have the most limited
capacity from institution to institution.capacity from institution to institution.
EARLY MIDDLE LATEL
OW
ME
DIU
MH
IGH T
AR
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
FFSS PP FFSS PP FFSS PP FFSS PPFFSS PP FFSS PPCU-
BoulderMSU Howard UW-
MadisonTAMU Vanderbi
lt
TA
R
LC
LT
DA
Network-related Network-related FindingsFindings
Most institutions have Most institutions have established high established high engagement engagement activities, especially for activities, especially for middle middle and late stagesand late stages
Few low engagement activities at Few low engagement activities at all all stages across Networkstages across Network
Few programs that meet scholar-Few programs that meet scholar-level level outcomes across Networkoutcomes across Network
Implications for Implications for InstitutionsInstitutions
Self-assessment for annual Self-assessment for annual planning & implementation-Can planning & implementation-Can partner institutions help you fill partner institutions help you fill “gaps”?“gaps”?
Adapt programming and Adapt programming and evaluation methods (e.g., Who is evaluation methods (e.g., Who is providing “low engagement providing “low engagement programs?)programs?)
Stages of Student Development
Levels of Engagement low medium high
Early
Mid
Late
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
TAR
Portable or adaptable “program” for an institution
TAR
TAR
“Program” offeringby the Network
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Figure 3. Program planning for the Network.
Implications for Implications for NetworkNetwork
Use resources to fill the most “gaps” Use resources to fill the most “gaps” across the Networkacross the Network
CIRTL Outcomes- “Fellow”, Practioner”, CIRTL Outcomes- “Fellow”, Practioner”, “Scholar”—How do we capture “Scholar”—How do we capture potentiallypotentially
lower levels of engagement with CIRTL lower levels of engagement with CIRTL Programs? “Awareness”? (Figure 3)Programs? “Awareness”? (Figure 3)
Figure 3. CIRTL Outcomes Figure 3. CIRTL Outcomes and Opportunities(?)and Opportunities(?)
Outcome Levels Outcome Levels
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fellow Practioner Fellow Practioner Scholar Scholar
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student- Student-Student- Student-
in school in schoolin school in school
AwarenAwarenessess
Student-Student-in schoolin school
Early Faculty Early FacultyEarly Faculty Early Faculty
Early Faculty Early FacultyEarly Faculty Early Faculty
Time?Time?$$$?$$$?EvaluationEvaluation Methods?Methods?
IMPACTS- IMPACTS- OPPORTUNITIES?OPPORTUNITIES?
Implications for Implications for Network (cont.)Network (cont.)
The future of the Network-rely on The future of the Network-rely on evaluation data to categorize evaluation data to categorize outcomes of programsoutcomes of programs
-Outcome goal- set during planning -Outcome goal- set during planning
-Evaluation-outcome achieved-Evaluation-outcome achieved
-Re-evaluate future program- -Re-evaluate future program- content,content,
delivery (Figure 4)delivery (Figure 4)
Figure 4. CIRTL Outcomes, Figure 4. CIRTL Outcomes, Evaluation & PlanningEvaluation & Planning
Awareness Awareness Awareness, Awareness, FellowFellow
Fellow, Fellow, PractionerPractioner
AwarenessAwareness Fellow, Fellow, PractionerPractioner
PractionerPractioner
Awareness, Awareness, FellowFellow
Fellow, Fellow, PractionerPractioner
Practioner, Practioner, ScholarScholar
Low Level Mid Level High Low Level Mid Level High Level Level Engagement Engagement Engagement Engagement EngagementEngagementEarlyEarly
MidMid
LateLate
Evaluation of Data, Reclassification of Outcomes,Evaluation of Data, Reclassification of Outcomes, Adjust Programs AccordinglyAdjust Programs Accordingly
Awareness Fellow Fellow, Practioner
Fellow Fellow, Practioner Practioner, Scholar
Fellow Fellow, Practioner Practioner