circulating levels of tumor markers

Upload: jagannadha-rao-peela

Post on 03-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Circulating Levels of Tumor Markers

    1/1

    reast cancer is most common malignant disorder in

    ibyan females. It is the most dreadful disease in terms

    f quality of life, in spite of heart disease being more

    ommon cause of mortality here. Benign and malignant

    reast disorders are very common in Libyan women

    milar to other Arab countries and particularly younger

    ndividuals are affected here when compared with the

    western population. This could be explained by the

    ttribution of various factors such as the robust

    pidemiological control of infectious diseases, increase

    n the average life span of the general population,

    igher socio-economic status, smoking, higher

    ncidence of hepatitis B and C, food fads and socio-

    conomic factors. Breast cancer is one of the leading

    ancers, with an earlier age of onset in Libya and 26%

    f all cancers belong to the category of breast cancers

    n Libya as per the Benghazi cancer registry. Almost aecade ago, Singh and Al-Sudani demonstrated that

    reast cancer is one of the top ten cancers responsible

    or high mortality in Libya. In another study conducted

    etween 1981 and 1985, breast cancer was the most

    equent type (29.8%) in females and the majority of

    hese patients were of a younger age group (72.3%

    elow 50 years). Almost all the patients selected for our

    tudy were multiparous and were breast-feeding. A

    ecent literature review by Najjar and Easson provided

    vidence that the average age of onset of breast cancer

    n Arab women is 48 years, almost a decade sooner

    han their western counterparts and this warrants

    ffective screening and management strategies. The

    resent study is a case control study of tumour markers

    CA 125, CA 15-3 and Carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA)

    n serum of patients suffering from benign and

    malignant breast disorders in Libya.

    Introduction

    ata on sex hormone status in 11 cases of

    onfirmed carcinoma of breast patients in the age

    roup ranging from 30 55 years of age have

    een retrieved from the department of surgery,

    th October Hospital, Benghazi, Libya. This data

    compared with 8 cases of benign fibroadenosis

    nd 9 age matched controls free from both

    malignant and benign disorders of breast in this

    tudy. Venous samples from the patients and

    ontrols were tested for serum CA125, CA15-

    and CEA levels by authenticated methods by

    sing Cobas E 411 analyser. Statistical analysis

    as done by SPSS software using Mann-

    Whitney and Wilcoxon tests.

    The present study has shown high levels

    of CA 15-3 and CEA only in malignant

    disorders of breast. This result identifies

    these biomarkers as the diagnostic and

    prognostic markers for carcinoma

    breast. CA 125 has not shown any

    significance in this study proving that it

    has no significance as a biomarker in

    malignant breast disorders.

    Table.1

    Material and Methods

    ResultsReferences

    There is no significant rise of CA 125 in benign

    (p=0814) and malignant (p= 0.676) disorders of

    breast when compared to controls. CA 15-3 was

    significantly high in patients suffering from breastcancer (p= 0.019) when compared to controls

    and also very significantly high when (p= 0.003)

    compared with patients with benign breast

    disorders. However, the levels of CA 15-3 was

    not significantly high in patients with benignbreast disorders (p=0.186) when compared to

    controls. The level of CEA was significantly high

    in patients of breast cancer when compared to

    patients of benign breast (p=0.009) disorders and

    (p=0.017) controls. However, the levels of CEA is

    not significantly high in patients with benignbreast disorders (p=0.634) when compared to

    controls. Results are summarized in table.1

    Circulating tumor markers of benign and malignant breast disorders in Libya

    J. R. Peela1, S. Shakila1, S. J. Dhoipode7 A. R. Said1, H. Beloch2S. Nang2 L. T. Peela3A. M. Jarari4S.O.Alsaeoti5H. El Awamy4N. M. Jarari6M. J. Kadeer4

    1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine,Quest International University Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia

    2. Faculty of Medicine,Quest International University Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia,

    3. Great Eastern Medical School, Srikakulam, India,

    4. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty ofMedicine,University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.

    5. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine,University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.

    6. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty ofMedicine,University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.

    7.Department of Pharmacology, Guardian college of Dental Sciences and research centre,Ambernath,Thane,Maharastra,India .

    Anim JT (1990) Breast cancer in Arab women: A

    review. Emirates Med J 8: 189-195.

    Elattar I (2005) Cancer in the Arab World:

    Magnitude of the Problem. UICC March 21-25.El Mistiri M, Verdecchia A, Rashid I, El Sahli N, El

    Mangush M, et al. (2007) Cancer incidence in

    eastern Libya: the first report from the Benghazi

    Cancer Registry, 2003. Int J Cancer 120: 392-

    397.

    Singh R, Al-Sudani OE (2001) Cancer mortality inBenghazi, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 1991-96.

    East Mediterr Health J 7: 255-273.

    Akhtar SS, Abu Bakr MA, Dawi SA, Huq IU

    (1993) Cancer in Libya--a retrospective study(1981-1985). Afr J Med Med Sci 22: 17-24.Najjar H, Easson A (2010) Age at diagnosis of

    breast cancer in Arab nations. Int J Surg 8:448-

    452

    Bielecka-Dbrowa A, Hannam S, Rysz J, Banach

    M (2011) Malignancy- Associated Dyslipidemia.Open Cardiovasc Med J 5: 35-40.

    Cheung KL, Graves CR, Robertson JF. Tumour

    marker measurements in the diagnosis and

    monitoring of breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev

    2000;26:91102.

    Molina R, Filella X, Alicarte J, Zanon G, Pahisa J,Munoz M, et al. Prospective evaluation of CEA

    and CA 15.3 in patients with locoregional breast

    cancer. Anticancer Res 2003;23:10351041.

    Gion M, Boracchi P, Dittadi R, Biganzoli E,

    Peloso L, Mione R, et al. Prognostic role ofserum CA15.3 in 362 node-negative breast

    cancers. An old player for a new game. Eur J

    Cancer 2002;38:11811188.

    Ebeling FG, Stieber P, Untch M, Nagel D,

    Konecny GE, Schmitt UM, et al. Serum CEA

    and CA 15-3 as prognostic factors in primarybreast cancer. Br J Cancer 2002;86:1217

    1222.

    Duffy MJ, Duggan C, Keane R, Hill AD,

    McDermott E, Crown J, OHiggins N. High

    preoperative CA 15-3 concentrations predict

    adverse outcome in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer: study of 600 patients

    with histologically confirmed breast cancer. Clin

    Chem 2004;50:559563.

    Molina R, Zanon G, Filella X, Moreno F, Jo J,

    Daniels M, et al. Use of serial carcinoembryonicantigen and CA 15.3 assays in detecting

    relapses in breast cancer patients. Breast

    Cancer Res Treat 1995;36:4148.

    Soletormos G, Nielsen D, Schioler V, Mouridsen

    H, Dombernowsky P. Monitoring differentstages of breast cancer using tumour markers

    CA 15-3, CEA and TPA. Eur J Cancer

    2004;40:481486.

    Molina R, Jo J, Filella X, Zanon G, Pahisa J,

    Munoz M, et al. c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA,

    and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer:prognostic value. Breast Cancer Res Treat

    1998;51:109119.

    TypeCA125 CA15-3 CEA

    Carcinoma

    Breast

    No of cases 11 11 11

    Mean 90.97 92.90 12.53

    Std Deviation 232.15 109.58 20.30Controls

    No of cases 9 99

    Mean 19.58 17.76 1.92

    Std Deviation 16.88 6.34 .90

    Fibroadenosis No of cases 8 8

    8

    Mean 17.92 13.38 1.57

    Std. Deviation 15.77 4.36 .387

    Conclusion