ciofi a tti - kek · 2009-09-25 · exp erimen tal study of sr c 6. t w o-and three-n ucleon sr c:...

54

Upload: others

Post on 31-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

C. CIOFI degli ATTIShort Range Correlations and their impa t on nu lear and parti lephysi s and astrophysi s: re ent advan es and possible studies atJ-PARC

KEK Theory Center workshoponShort-range orrelations and tensor stru ture at J-PARC

C. Cio� degli Atti 1 KEK, September 2009

LIST OF CONTENS1. Introdu tion: two re ent "popular" papers on short range or-relations (SRC)2. The standard model of nu lei3. Relevan e of SRC in di�erent pro esses4. Independent and orrelated nu leons: their smoking guns5. Experimental study of SRC6. Two- and three-nu leon SRC: in lusive A(e,e')X pro esses7. Hadron s attering o� nu lei at high energies (HERA,RHIC,LHC)8. Con lusions

C. Cio� degli Atti 2 KEK, September 2009

1 Introdu tion: two re ent "popular" papers on short range orrelations (SRC)

C. Cio� degli Atti 3 KEK, September 2009

C. Cio� degli Atti 4 KEK, September 2009

C. Cio� degli Atti 5 KEK, September 2009

SCIENCE 320, 1476 (2008)R. SUBEDI et al Probing Cold Dense Nu lear Matter

The protons and neutrons in a nu leus an form strongly orrelatednu leon pairs. S attering experiments, in whi h a proton is kno kedout of the nu leus with high-momentum transfer and high missingmomentum, show that in arbon-12 the neutron-proton pairs arenearly 20 times as prevalent as proton-proton pairs and, by infer-en e, neutron-neutron pairs. This di�eren e between the types ofpairs is due to the nature of the strong for e and has impli ationsfor understanding old dense nu lear systems su h as neutron stars.

C. Cio� degli Atti 6 KEK, September 2009

2. THE STANDARD MODEL OF NUCLEI

C. Cio� degli Atti 7 KEK, September 2009

[

− h2

2m

i ∇2i +

i<j v(i, j) +∑

i<j<k v(i, j, k) + . . .]

Ψo = EoΨ0

vij(xi, xj) =∑

n

v(n)(rij)O(n)ij rij ≡ |ri − rj|

O(n)ij =

[

1 , σi · σj , Sij , (L · S)ij , ...]

⊗[

1 , τ i · τ j]

.

short-range repulsion ( ommon to many systems)

•• intermediate- to long-range tensor hara ter (unique to nu lei)

C. Cio� degli Atti 8 KEK, September 2009

THE MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATION[

− h2

2m

i ∇2i +

i<j vij

]

Ψo = EoΨo

⇓[

− h2

2m

i ∇2i +

i V i

]

Φo = ǫoΦoIndependent parti le motion → Shell Model

Mean �eld or Shell Model: nu leons o upy all available states belowthe Fermi level; all states above the Fermi level are empty. Greatsu ess (magi numbers, magneti moments, low ex itation levels,et ). Re ent developments: establish the limits of validity by ad-van ed solution of the nu lear many-body problem.

C. Cio� degli Atti 9 KEK, September 2009

THE "EXACT" MANY-BODY SOLUTIONRe ent developments towards the exa t solution ofHΨo = EnΨo , with vij =

n v(n)(rij) O(n)ijThe same operatorial dependen e appearing in vij is ast onto thetrial fun tion Ψo:

Ψo = FΦowhere Φo is the mean-�eld wave fun tion andF = S

i<j

fij = S∏

i<j

n

f (n)(rij) O(n)ijis a orrelation operator.

Variational monte arlo (Urbana Group)Cluster expansion te hniques ( Here:Alvioli, Cda, Morita)

C. Cio� degli Atti 10 KEK, September 2009

The orrelation fun tions fij: Central, Spin-Isospin, Tensor . . .

0 1 2 3 4 5

-0.04-0.020.000.020.040.060.080.10 f(r)

4 - 5 - S 6 - S

16O - AV8'

r [fm]

1 - fc (/10) 2 - 3 -

SRC → two nu leons at separation shorter than average separation(≃ 1.7 fm)

C. Cio� degli Atti 11 KEK, September 2009

THE NOVEL VIEW OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS

Nu lei onsist also of drops of old high density matterCru ial question: what is the per entage of SRC? Can we measureit? Why it is important to know it

C. Cio� degli Atti 12 KEK, September 2009

3. RELEVANCE OF SRC IN DIFFERENT PROCESSES

C. Cio� degli Atti 13 KEK, September 2009

3.1. Study of ore and tensor orrelationsQuark, gluon or pion des riptions of NN intera tion?

Adapted from: W. Weise, Nu l. Phys. A 805(2008)145

C. Cio� degli Atti 14 KEK, September 2009

3.2 Transition from hadron to quark gluon des riptions of nu lei

Nu leon radius < r2 >1/2≃ 0.8fm−1 ⇒ Nu leon overlap.

3.3 Medium indu ed modi� ations of hadron properties ??

EMC e�e t and SRC

CdA, L. Kaptari, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. C 76(2007) 055206

C. Cio� degli Atti 15 KEK, September 2009

3.4 High energy s attering pro essesThe little bang in the laboratory

Signals depends upon the way hadrons propagated in the medium.SRC do a�e t hadron propagation.

C. Cio� degli Atti 16 KEK, September 2009

3.5 Formation of old dense nu lear matter in the laboratory

How are neutron star properties a�e ted by SRC?

C. Cio� degli Atti 17 KEK, September 2009

!"#$%&'($)*(+,-(+.&/-(0)*)(1)&-(&2)*34)1,5)3&"(&6+7*-("1&2%83"13&

'B4."1+,-(3&0-*&=)<$*-(&!$+*3&

y!)EF)FG%)#&.%)&-)'%"F.&')(FB.(H)/&(F)B##%IF%J)/&J%$()B(("/%)DK@6L)'%"F.&'(H)K6L)I.&F&'()

y!)!%M$%#N'M)FG%)'I2345)0'F%.B#N&'(H)&'%)#B')B(("/%)FO&)(%IB.BF%)P%./0)MB(%()

y!)30'#%)'I)0'F%.B#N&')0()$B.M%)#&/IB.%J)F&)''H)')MB()G%BF()FG%)I)MB()

y!)QG0()#&"$J)%R%#F)FG%)"II%.)$0/0F)&')/B(()&-)'%"F.&')B'J)B$$&O)FG%)'%"F.&'()0')FG%)(FB.)J%#BS))))&

C. Cio� degli Atti 18 KEK, September 2009

4. INDEPENDENT NUCLEONS AND CORRELATEDNUCLEONS: WHICH ARE THE SMOKING GUNS?

C. Cio� degli Atti 19 KEK, September 2009

.

• Repulsive ore and tensor for e generate high momentum ompo-nents (k >> kF ≃ 1.4 fm−1)

• Properties of nu lear matter at short distan es resemblethe properties of the deuteron (T=0, S=1 proton-neutronpairs)("deuteron s aling")•Wide spe trum of ex itation energy of the nu leus(Spe tral Fun tion)

C. Cio� degli Atti 20 KEK, September 2009

4.1 High momentum omponents. The role of the ore and thetensor for e0 1 2 3 4

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

VMC

Mean Field Central Central

+ Tensor

n(k)

[fm

3 ]

k [fm-1]

16O

Tensor for es a ting in T=0 S=1 states produ e the largest amountof high momentum omponents. Mean �eld distributions drop tozero at k ≥ 1.5− 2 fm−1 (Adapted from Alvioli, CdA, Morita,Phys.Rev. C72(2005)054310)

C. Cio� degli Atti 21 KEK, September 2009

4.2 High momentum omponents and deuteron s alingdue to NN orrelations the 1-body momentum distributions a quire pe uliarhigh momentum omponents

The high momentum (k > kF ) part of nA(k) an be viewed as theres aled deuteron momentum distribution: nA(k) ≃ CA nD(k).(Adapted from Cda, Simula, Phys. Rev. 53(1996)1689)

C. Cio� degli Atti 22 KEK, September 2009

Role of orrelations better seen in the2-body momentum distributions0 1 2 3 4 5

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

n(k re

l,KC

M=0

) [fm

6 ]

krel [fm-1]

12C Total p - p p - n deuteron

0 1 2 3 4 5100101102103104105106107

40Ca

krel [fm-1]

Total p - p p - n deuteron

M. Alvioli, CdA, H.Morita, Phys. Rev. Lett, 100, 162503, (2008)The tensor deuteron-like ( T=0, S=1)dominan e at

krel ≥ 1.5− 2 fm−1o urs both in few-nu leon systems and omplexnu lei.

C. Cio� degli Atti 23 KEK, September 2009

4.3 High ex itation energy omponents

P0(k,E) P1(k,E)S M (E = ǫα) : 80% Correlations (E ≃ k2/2mN) : 20%S. Simula, CdA - Phys. Rev. C53 (1996) 1689

C. Cio� degli Atti 24 KEK, September 2009

5. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF CORRELATIONS

C. Cio� degli Atti 25 KEK, September 2009

.CAN THESE RELEVANT DEVIATIONS FROM THE WELLHONORED MEAN FIELD DESCRIPTION OF NUCLEIEXPERIMENTALLY BE DETECTED?YES THEY CAN BY REMOVING THE NUCLEUSCONSTITUENTS AT HIGH ENERGY AND MOMENTUMTRANSFERS

THE A(e, e′N )X and A(e, e′NN )X PROCESSESTHE A(p, p′N )X and A(p, p′NN )X PROCESSESIn double and triple oin iden e experiments the kinemati s isfully determined

C. Cio� degli Atti 26 KEK, September 2009

Example: the (e,e'p) pro ess on mean �eld and orrelatednu leons.Mean Field:

k1 + kA−1 = 0

The double oin iden e ross se tion:

dσd~e′d~p

∝ σep(~q,~k1 ν)× P0(k1, E)

P0(k1, E) =∑

α nα(k1)δ(E − ǫα)

C. Cio� degli Atti 27 KEK, September 2009

Correlations:

k1+k2+k3 = 0 k3 ≡ KA−2Simple model:

{

k2 ≃ −k1 k3 ≃ 0 E∗A−2 = 0

E∗A−1 ≃

A−2A−1

k212mNRealisti model:

k3 6= 0 E∗A−2 6= 0

E∗A−1 =

A−22mN (A−1)

[

k1 +A−1A−2 k3

]2+ EA−2The double oin iden e ross se tion:

dσd~e′d~p

∝ σep(~q,~k1 ν)× P1(k1, E)

P1(k1, E) = {models whi h in ludes orrelations} → Morita'stalk

C. Cio� degli Atti 28 KEK, September 2009

One important aveat

C. Cio� degli Atti 29 KEK, September 2009

The 12C(e, e′p)X pro ess from its birth to present day1966 LNF (Italy) 1988 NIKHEF (Holland) 2006 JLab (USA)

C. Cio� degli Atti 30 KEK, September 2009

Re ent Developments (triple oin iden e experiments)

By dete ting 2 Nu leons in the �nal state the initial pair orrelation an be studiedTriple oin iden e experiment A(a, a′NN )X a = {p, e}BNL and JLAB EXPERIMENTS

C. Cio� degli Atti 31 KEK, September 2009

!"#$%&'($)*(+,-(+.&/-(0)*)(1)&-(&2)*34)1,5)3&"(&6+7*-("1&2%83"13&

/<3$-B"Q)7&G)J)[4=I&L)+3<*)B)($&

•! %";%&NO&$-&B"("B"Q)&Lb/&&&&

•! #fT&$-&3<44*)33&"3->+*&1-($*"><,-(3&

•! +(,94+*+..).&^"()B+,13&$-&3<44*)33&k!'&

H-&3$<78&(<1.)-(&4+"*3&+$&1.-3)&4*-#"B"$8&+(7&$%)"*&1-($*"><,-(3&$-&$%)&.+*;)&B-B)($<B&

$+".&-0&(<1.)-(3&"(&(<1.)"A&

F&4+"*&M"$%&m.+*;)o&*).+,5)&

B-B)($<B&>)$M))(&$%)&(<1.)-(3&

+(7&3B+..&1)($)*&-0&B+33&B-B)($<B&

C. Cio� degli Atti 32 KEK, September 2009

Momentum onservationq = p + PA−1Missing momentumpm = q− p = {IA} = q− (k1 + q− q) = −k1 = PA−1

Dete t k' , p and pla e a dete tor at the dire tion of PA−1. Sin e if2NC model is orre t we have PA−1 = k2 + PA−2 ≃ −k1, we shoulddete t the orrelated partner of nu leon "1" with momentum pm.

C. Cio� degli Atti 33 KEK, September 2009

Correlations:

k1+k2+k3 = 0 k3 ≡ KA−2Simple model:

{

k2 ≃ −k1 k3 ≃ 0 E∗A−2 = 0

E∗A−1 ≃

A−2A−1

k212mNRealisti model:

k3 6= 0 E∗A−2 6= 0

E∗A−1 =

A−22mN (A−1)

[

k1 +A−1A−2 k3

]2+ EA−2

C. Cio� degli Atti 34 KEK, September 2009

BNL p beam 5.9− 7.5GeV/c, 12C targetPhys. Lett. B453 (99) 202; Phys. Rev. C65 (01) 015207; Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(03) 042301

C. Cio� degli Atti 35 KEK, September 2009

pn

Directional correlation

p

n

Pn>220 MeV/c

Pn<220 MeV/c

The EVA/BNL collaboration

(p,2pn)

C. Cio� degli Atti 36 KEK, September 2009

C. Cio� degli Atti 37 KEK, September 2009

C. Cio� degli Atti 38 KEK, September 2009

C. Cio� degli Atti 39 KEK, September 2009

R. Subedi et al, S ien e 320,1476 (2008)C. Cio� degli Atti 40 KEK, September 2009

The orrelation pizza in 12C

R. Subedi et al,S ien e 320,1476 (2008)

C. Cio� degli Atti 41 KEK, September 2009

.

The novel view of the atomi nu leus

C. Cio� degli Atti 42 KEK, September 2009

6 TWO AND THREE NUCLEON CORRELATIONS:INCLUSIVE A(e, e′)X PROCESSES

C. Cio� degli Atti 43 KEK, September 2009

TWO-NUCLEON CORRELATIONS::k1 ≃ −k2 large and k3 ≃ 0THREE-NUCLEON CORRELATIONS:

k1 + k2 + k3 = 0 all three momenta are large

Correlations an be linked to the value of the Bjorken s alingvariable xB = Q2

2mN ν ⇒ 2N CORRELATIONS: a kind of "two-bodysystem"; 3N CORRELATIONS: a kind of "three-body systems"s attering on a single nu leon: 0 < xB < 1s attering on 2 orrelated nu leons: 1 < xB < 2s attering on 3 orrelated nu leons: 2 < xB < 3

C. Cio� degli Atti 44 KEK, September 2009

Measurement of Two- and Three-Nucleon Short-Range Correlation Probabilities in Nuclei

K. S. Egiyan,1,34 N. B. Dashyan,1 M. M. Sargsian,10 M. I. Strikman,28 L. B. Weinstein,27 G. Adams,30 P. Ambrozewicz,10

M. Anghinolfi,16 B. Asavapibhop,22 G. Asryan,1 H. Avakian,34 H. Baghdasaryan,27 N. Baillie,38 J. P. Ball,2

N. A. Baltzell,33 V. Batourine,20 M. Battaglieri,16 I. Bedlinskiy,18 M. Bektasoglu,27 M. Bellis,30,4 N. Benmouna,12

A. S. Biselli,30,4 B. E. Bonner,31 S. Bouchigny,34,17 S. Boiarinov,34 R. Bradford,4 D. Branford,9 W. K. Brooks,34

S. Bultmann,27 V. D. Burkert,34 C. Bultuceanu,38 J. R. Calarco,24 S. L. Careccia,27 D. S. Carman,26 B. Carnahan,5

S. Chen,11 P. L. Cole,34,14 P. Coltharp,11,34 P. Corvisiero,16 D. Crabb,37 H. Crannell,5 J. P. Cummings,30 E. De Sanctis,15

R. DeVita,16 P. V. Degtyarenko,34 H. Denizli,29 L. Dennis,11 K. V. Dharmawardane,27 C. Djalali,33 G. E. Dodge,27

J. Donnelly,13 D. Doughty,7,34 P. Dragovitsch,11 M. Dugger,2 S. Dytman,29 O. P. Dzyubak,33 H. Egiyan,24 L. Elouadrhiri,34

A. Empl,30 P. Eugenio,11 R. Fatemi,37 G. Fedotov,23 R. J. Feuerbach,4 T. A. Forest,27 H. Funsten,38 G. Gavalian,27

N. G. Gevorgyan,1 G. P. Gilfoyle,32 K. L. Giovanetti,19 F. X. Girod,6 J. T. Goetz,3 E. Golovatch,16 R. W. Gothe,33

K. A. Griffioen,38 M. Guidal,17 M. Guillo,33 N. Guler,27 L. Guo,34 V. Gyurjyan,34 C. Hadjidakis,17 J. Hardie,7,34

F. W. Hersman,24 K. Hicks,26 I. Hleiqawi,26 M. Holtrop,24 J. Hu,30 M. Huertas,33 C. E. Hyde-Wright,27 Y. Ilieva,12

D. G. Ireland,13 B. S. Ishkhanov,23 M. M. Ito,34 D. Jenkins,36 H. S. Jo,17 K. Joo,37,8 H. G. Juengst,12 J. D. Kellie,13

M. Khandaker,25 K. Y. Kim,29 K. Kim,20 W. Kim,27,20 A. Klein,27,20 F. J. Klein,27 A. Klimenko,27 M. Klusman,30

L. H. Kramer,10,34 V. Kubarovsky,30 J. Kuhn,4 S. E. Kuhn,27 S. Kuleshov,18 J. Lachniet,4 J. M. Laget,6,34 J. Langheinrich,33

D. Lawrence,22 T. Lee,24 K. Livingston,13 L. C. Maximon,12 S. McAleer,11 B. McKinnon,13 J. W. C. McNabb,4

B. A. Mecking,34 M. D. Mestayer,34 C. A. Meyer,4 T. Mibe,26 K. Mikhailov,18 R. Minehart,37 M. Mirazita,15

R. Miskimen,22 V. Mokeev,23,34 S. A. Morrow,6,17 J. Mueller,29 G. S. Mutchler,31 P. Nadel-Turonski,12 J. Napolitano,30

R. Nasseripour,10 S. Niccolai,12,17 G. Niculescu,26,19 I. Niculescu,12,19 B. B. Niczyporuk,34 R. A. Niyazov,34

G. V. O’Rielly,22 M. Osipenko,16,23 A. I. Ostrovidov,11 K. Park,20 E. Pasyuk,2 C. Peterson,13 J. Pierce,37 N. Pivnyuk,18

D. Pocanic,37 O. Pogorelko,18 E. Polli,15 S. Pozdniakov,18 B. M. Preedom,33 J. W. Price,3 Y. Prok,34 D. Protopopescu,13

L. M. Qin,27 B. A. Raue,10,34 G. Riccardi,11 G. Ricco,16 M. Ripani,16 B. G. Ritchie,2 F. Ronchetti,15 G. Rosner,13 P. Rossi,15

D. Rowntree,21 P. D. Rubin,32 F. Sabatie,27,6 C. Salgado,25 J. P. Santoro,36,34 V. Sapunenko,16,34 R. A. Schumacher,4

V. S. Serov,18 Y. G. Sharabian,34 J. Shaw,22 E. S. Smith,34 L. C. Smith,37 D. I. Sober,5 A. Stavinsky,18 S. Stepanyan,34

B. E. Stokes,11 P. Stoler,30 S. Strauch,33 R. Suleiman,21 M. Taiuti,16 S. Taylor,31 D. J. Tedeschi,33 R. Thompson,29

A. Tkabladze,27,26 S. Tkachenko,27,26 L. Todor,4 C. Tur,33 M. Ungaro,30,8 M. F. Vineyard,35,32 A. V. Vlassov,18

D. P. Weygand,34 M. Williams,4 E. Wolin,34 M. H. Wood,33 A. Yegneswaran,34 J. Yun,27 L. Zana,24 and J. Zhang27

(CLAS Collaboration)

1Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan 375036, Armenia

PRL 96, 082501 (2006)P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S week ending

3 MARCH 2006

,32

22

� �QM

QxB

22 4.1 GeVQ !

The observed “scaling” means

that the electrons probe the

high-momentum nucleons in the

2/3-nucleon phase, and the

scaling factors determine the

per-nucleon probability of the

2/3N-SRC phase in nuclei with

A>3 relative to 3He.

K. Sh. Egiyan et al. PRL. 96, 082501 (2006)

The probabilities for 3-nucleon

SRC are smaller by one order

of magnitude relative to the 2N

SRC.

r(4H

e,3

He

)a)

r(1

2C

,3H

e)

b)

xB

r(5

6F

e,3

He

) c)

1

2

3

1

2

3

4

2

4

6

1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75

New CLAS A(e,e') Result:

3N-SRC Less than 1% of total

K. Sh. Egiyan et al. PRC 68, 014313.

cMeVM

QxB /,. 275P 51

2in

2

t! Q

2N-SRC(np,pp,nn) = 0.20 ± 0.045%

For 12 C:

C. Cio� degli Atti 45 KEK, September 2009

Mezzetti's talkC. Cio� degli Atti, C.B. Mezzetti, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 051302(R); C.B. Mezzetti, C. Cio�degli Atti, arXiv:0906.5564 (2009)

C. Cio� degli Atti 46 KEK, September 2009

7 HADRON SCATTERING OFF NUCLEI AT HIGH ENERGIES(HERA, RHIC, LHC)

C. Cio� degli Atti 47 KEK, September 2009

The total neutron−Nucleus ross se tion at high energies:σtot =

4πk Im [F00(0)] F00(q) =

ik2π

d2bneiq·bn

[

1− eiχopt(bn)]

eiχopt(bn) =

∫ A∏

j=1

drj

A∏

j=1

[1−Γ(bn−sj)] |Ψ0(r1, ..., rA)|2δ

(

1

A

∑ rj) .

The exa t expansion of |Ψ|2 (Glauber, Foldy & Wale ka ):

|Ψ(r1, ..., rA)|2 =

A∏

j=1

ρ(rj) +A∑

i<j=1

∆(ri, rj)A∏

k 6=(il)

ρ(rk) +

+∑

(i<j) 6=(k<l)

∆(ri, rj)∆(rk, rl)∏

m6=i,j,k,l

ρ1(rm) + . . .

∆(ri, rj) = ρ(2)(ri, rj) − ρ(1)(ri) ρ(1)(rj) ;C. Cio� degli Atti 48 KEK, September 2009

|Ψ(r1, ..., rA)|2 =

A∏

j=1

ρ(rj) +A∑

i<j=1

∆(ri, rj)A∏

k 6=(il)

ρ(rk) +

+∑

(i<j) 6=(k<l)

∆(ri, rj)∆(rk, rl)∏

m6=i,j,k,l

ρ1(rm) + . . .

≃A∏

j=1

ρ(rj)

Usual approximation in Glauber-type al ulation: what is itsvalidity?

C. Cio� degli Atti 49 KEK, September 2009

Glauber + Inelasti shadowing(Di�ra tive ex itation of the proje tile)V. N. Gribov, Sov. JETP 29 (1969) 483;V.A.Karmanov,L.A.Kondratyuk, JETP Lett. 18 (1973) 451;B. Z. Kopeliovi h, I. K. Potashnikova, I. S hmidt, Phys. Rev.C73 (2006)034901NN

AA

fNN N

A A

NX XNfN f N N

A A

NX f XNf f XX

(Glauber) (Inelasti Shadowing)total neutron-Nu leus ross se tion

σtot = 4 πk Im

[

FG00(0)

]

+ ∆σin = σG + ∆σinC. Cio� degli Atti 50 KEK, September 2009

M. Alvioli, C.d.A, I. Mar hino, H. Morita, V. PalliPhys. Rev. C78(R),031601(2008) No free parameters!!10 100

125

130

135

140

145 one body correlations correlations + in

tot [m

b]

plab [GeV/c]

4He

10 100320

340

360

380

400

tot [m

b]

plab

[Gev/c]

mean field correlations correlations +

in

12C

10 100

2900

3000

3100

3200

3300

tot [m

b]

plab

[Gev/c]

mean field correlations correlations +

in

208Pb

C. Cio� degli Atti 51 KEK, September 2009

Cal ulations of total, elasti , quasi-elasti and di�ra tionhadron-Nu leus ross se tions at HERA, RHIC and LHC energy,taking inelasti Gribov orre tions and SRC into a ount, are inprogress. (Alvioli, CdA, Kopeliovi h, S hmidt, Potashnikova)Experimental data and theoreti al al ulations of this type wouldbe of great relevan e in the �elds of, e.g., high energy heavy ion ollisions, hadronization me hanism, and other phenomena whi h ould be investigated by using the atomi nu leus as a mi rodete tor of QCD e�e ts.

C. Cio� degli Atti 52 KEK, September 2009

8. CONCLUSIONS

C. Cio� degli Atti 53 KEK, September 2009

• Advan ed solutions of the nu lear many-body problem lead tonu lear wave fun tions exhibiting a ri h SRC stru ture.• The tensor for e plays a dominant role in reating high momen-tum omponents.

• Reliable experimental information on 2NC and, partly, on 3NCbe ame available on�rming the basi stru ture of SRC, e.g. highrelative momenta of the orrelated pair and small pair CM mo-mentum.

• Correlation pizza ooked out only for 12C. Experiments on othernu lei both with lepton and hadroni probes are alled for.

• SRC have relevant impa t on the stru ture of old dense matterand intermediate and high energy s attering pro esses.

C. Cio� degli Atti 54 KEK, September 2009