cigre 2010 santiago de chile · 2017. 3. 20. · -3ap3 fi 550 kv no damage-3ap1 fi 245 kv damage on...

20
Copyright © Siemens AG Energy Sector CIGRE 2010 “Seismic Behavior of Siemens Circuit Breakers during the Earthquake on 27 February 2010 in Chile ” October 19th, 2010

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Copyright © Siemens AGEnergy Sector

    CIGRE 2010 “Seismic Behavior of Siemens Circuit Breakers during the Earthquake on27 February 2010 in Chile ”

    October 19th, 2010

  • page 2 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Siemens circuit breaker sold by factory Berlin andpercentage of CB with seismic requirements

    In the years 2005-2010 round about 22 000 circuit breaker (life tank and dead tank ) have been delivered from the Siemens factory Berlin.

    25% (5500) had seismic requirements from different standards (from 0.3g ZPA – mostly 0.5g ZPA).

    Until the severe earthquake on 27 February 2010 no Siemens circuit breaker did fail caused by seismic action.

  • page 3 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Brief history of seismic qualification of Siemens circuit breakers

    -from 1990 – seismic tests with acc. time history; before 1990 seismic testswith sine beats

    -from 1998 – dynamic calculations; FEM ADINA; before 1998 static calculations only

    -from 2002 – dynamic analysis with ANSYS Classic

    -from 2009 - dynamic analysis with ANSYS Workbench

  • page 4 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Some aspects of the Standards IEEE 693,ETG and IEC 62271-300

    IEEE ETG IEC

    -calculation not excepted 169 kV - -and above

    -switching during seismic test x - -

    -sine beat x x -

    -damping ratio for calculation 2% x x xif not justified other values

  • page 5 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Comparison of calculation and test

    Installation of test equipment

  • page 6 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Comparison of calculation and test

    Natural frequencies

    calculated tested location

    X 4,9 Hz (- 6%) 5,2 Hz Bushing8,7 Hz minor frequency9,7 Hz minor frequency

    19,1 Hz (+20%) 15,9 Hz Frame26,4 Hz minor frequency

    Y 4,8 Hz (- 9%) 5,3 Hz Bushing15,5 Hz (+26%) 12,3 Hz Frame

    23,1 Hz minor frequency

    26,4 Hz minor frequency

    Z not detected 15,8 Hz Control cabinet25,1 Hz minor frequency29,7 Hz minor frequency33,1 Hz minor frequency

    Dire

    ctio

    n

  • page 7 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Mises stress plot

    test results 100%

    Comparison of calculation and test

    133%

    116% 207%

    93%

    91%

    calculated results:

  • page 8 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    frequency: 100% about 140%

    Unprestressed and pre-stressed modal analysis with response spectrum method

    displacement: 100% about 50%

    stress post insulator: 100% about 70%

    F 2000 N0 N

    (IEC 62271-300; 0,5g and 5% damping ration)

  • page 9 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    How many modes are necessary?

    calculation with 3 modes

    stress post insulator: 100% about 96%

    calculation with only 1 mode

  • page 10 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Influence of cable connection

    (example from literature)

    slack span:case 1 - 110 mm

    slack span:case 2 – 490 mm

  • page 11 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Influence of foundation and steel structure

    seismic tests with two different steel structures showed a different of 40% in the bending moment of a life tank CB post insulator

    frequency

    acce

    lera

    tion

    0,5g ZPA

    dampers??

  • page 12 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Some spectrums from Santiago de Chile5 % damping (acceleration not rectified)

    critical frequency of about 2 Hz

  • page 13 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Siemens circuit breaker in Chile

    Behavior of Siemens circuit breakers during 27 of February 2010

    -3AP3 FI 550 kV � no damage

    -3AP1 FI 245 kV � damage on the mechanism housingportland cementation?

    -3AP1 FG 245 kV � damage on some porcelains

    -3AP1 DT FI 245 kV � no damage

    -voltage level under 245 kV � no damage

  • page 14 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    3AP3 FI 550 kV with friction dampers

    no damage occurred

  • page 15 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    3AP1 FI 245 kV

    damage on:-the mechanism housing-portland cementation?

  • page 16 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    3AP1 FG 245 kV

    -dynamic calculation did show a safety factor of more than two according the ETG 1.020

    -cable connection on the terminals seems to be okay

    -Why the porcelain broke?

    -Frequencies and level of seismic motion?

  • page 17 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Seismic analysis qualification by FEMin the past and present

    ANSYS “Classic” ANSYS “Workbench”

  • page 18 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Remedial work

    The reinforcement of the corners of the mechanism housingFoto FE mesh

  • page 19 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Comparison of calculationmechanism housing

    without reinforcment with reinforcement

    Mises stress 100% Mises stress about 50%

  • page 20 October 19 th, 2010Copyright © Siemens AG

    Energy SectorUlf Heinrich

    Future work

    -use more accurate FE-Models (using the models directly from CAD-program in order to prepare the geometrical model)

    -reinforce the mechanism housing with ductil steel parts below the steel frame

    -perform a seismic test according ETG A.0.20 for the 3AP1FI 245 kV

    -where necessary reinforce the porcelains

    -use dampers where necessary