church history ii toward a lutheran historical taxonomy may 3, 2008 david corliss church history ii...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CHURCH HISTORY IICHURCH HISTORY II
TOWARD A LUTHERAN TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMYHISTORICAL TAXONOMY
MAY 3, 2008MAY 3, 2008
DAVID CORLISSDAVID CORLISS
![Page 2: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINEOUTLINE
A System of ClassificationA System of Classification
Non-Synodical LutheransNon-Synodical LutheransDoctrinal Lutherans – An Doctrinal Lutherans – An
ExampleExampleDevelopment of Lutheran Development of Lutheran Synods in North America Synods in North America
Current HistoryCurrent History
![Page 3: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Doctrinal:Accepting of the Augsburg Confession, regardless of denomination
THREE TYPES OF LUTHERANS
Congregational:Primarily association is with a congregationthat happens to be Lutheran
Synodical:Identity lies with a specifically named sub-group within the Lutheran community
![Page 4: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Doctrinal Lutherans: An Doctrinal Lutherans: An Example Example
Justification by Faith, not Justification by Faith, not Works – Augsburg Works – Augsburg
Confessions IV, VI & XConfessions IV, VI & XRole of the Clergy – A.C. VRole of the Clergy – A.C. V
The Role of Saints – A.C. XXI The Role of Saints – A.C. XXI
Bishops as Religious, not Bishops as Religious, not Secular, Rulers – A.C. XXVIIISecular, Rulers – A.C. XXVIII
![Page 5: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Finnish becomes a cultural touchstone, not a liturgical reality, by 1920. Cooperation with other denominations begins.
Finnish migration begins in large numbers: 1870.
Suomi Synod founded 1890
Finnish
Founding Synod of the LCA in 1963
Strong roles of women in congregations influenced later synods
![Page 6: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Merge to form NLCA in 1917. Use of Norwegian declines, by 1920. Small, conservative “Little” Norwegian Synod separates in 1919.
Norwegian migration begins c. 1860.
Many small independent Synods 1870 - 1886
Norwegian
Founding Synod of the ALC in 1960
“Low Church” piety and the preference for small independent institutions influenced later synods
![Page 7: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Originally conservative, became increasingly liberal under the influence of Historical Criticism in the 20th century
Swedish migration increases in 1850.
Augustana Synod founded 1860
Swedish
Founding Synod of the LCA in 1963
Strong Organization and “High Church” piety influenced later synods
![Page 8: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
LCMS absorbs other conservative German Synods, including the Illinois and Pennsylvania Synods
Conservative LCMS founded 1847, breaks with Historic Episcopacy; More liberal German Lutherans organized later under the ULCA.
German
Divides over doctrinal issues in 1974; the remaining LMCS becomes more conservative
Break away Center-Left AELC and the ULCA eventually become constituents of the ELCA
![Page 9: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Center-Left Churches merge to form ELCA in 1988. Liberal LMCS members tend to migrate to the ELCA and conservative ELCA members to the LCMS.
LCMS merges with small, conservative denominations.
RE-ALLINGMENT
Center-Left ELCA faces dissent over liberal issues not impacting either more liberal or more conservative churches. Further division cannot be ruled out.
![Page 10: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Martin Marty, A Short History of Christianity, Second Edition, Fortress Press, 1987
Eric W. Gritsch, A History of Lutheranism, Fortress Press, 2002
REFERENCES
![Page 11: CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID CORLISS CHURCH HISTORY II TOWARD A LUTHERAN HISTORICAL TAXONOMY MAY 3, 2008 DAVID](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082709/56649f425503460f94c62660/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A Final Thought -
“Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.”
George E. P. Box
(Norman R. Draper (1987). Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, p. 424, Wiley.)