chromasun micro-concentratorchromasun.com/images/content/presentations/chromasun cep...page 4 peter...
TRANSCRIPT
Chromasun Micro-Concentrator
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 2
Chromasun Background
Chromasun’s founders designed and installed the Linear
Fresnel Solar Array at Liddell Power Station in the Hunter
Valley. This array still stands as Australia’s largest solar
thermal installation
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 3
Fresnel Reflector Optic
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 4
Chromasun Micro-Concentrator
The MCT is fixed on a rooftop however it has an array of mirrors within
the unit that rotate and track the sun to provide 25X sun concentration
onto two parallel pipes inside.
The result is an industrial grade solar product that is able to efficiently
generate steam up to 200ºC,
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 5
MCT Exploded View
Receiver Pipe (SS 304 A213 Tube)
Parallel Mirrors
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 6
Micro-Concentrator (MCT)
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 7
MCT Tracking
• Closed loop tracking
• Autonomous Plug-and-play
• No need for any optical alignment
• Integrated output temperature sensing
• Solar field can be turned off (no
stagnation issues)
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 8
Chromasun MCT Installation – Simple!
MCT is self-supporting and has an integrated rack.
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 9
Chromasun MCT Installation – Simple!
The MCT product is a modular plug-and-play concentrator.
Installation and execution of the solar array without the
complexities that come with other concentrator systems.
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 10
First look! 2010 Alanod - Intersolar Munich
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 11
MCT Testing: Santa Clara University Solar House
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 12
Santa Clara University Solar House – Yazaki 3 ton.
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 13
SRCC Testing in Menlo Park, California OG600 / EN 12975 Completed December 2010
SRCC= Solar Rating & Certification Corporation
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 14
Testing in Bangalore, India (General Electric)
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 15
Testing in Munich, Germany (General Electric)
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 16
Testing Los Angeles, USA (Southern California Gas Company)
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 17
Solar Concentrators vs Evacuated Tubes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Co
llect
or
Effi
cien
cy [
%]
Temperature Difference (Tm-Ta) [C]
Solar Concentrator Efficiency (with varying DNI)
100 200 300 400 500
600 700 800 900 1000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Co
llect
or
Effi
cien
cy [
%]
Temperature Difference (Tm-Ta) [C]
Evacuated Tube Efficiency (with varying global radiation)
100 200 300 400 500
600 700 800 900 1000
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 18
Solar Concentrators vs Evacuated Tubes
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Co
llect
or
Effi
cien
cy [
%]
Temperature Difference (Tm-Ta) [C]
Solar Concentrator Efficiency
100 200 300 400 500
600 700 800 900 1000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Co
llect
or
Effi
cien
cy [
%]
Temperature Difference (Tm-Ta) [C]
Flat Plate Collector Efficiency
100 200 300 400 500
600 700 800 900 1000
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 19
MCT vs Evacuated Tubes
MCT
• Non-Evacuated Receiver
for 20 year lifetime
• Stainless-steel boiler tube
as receiver. Rated >100bar
• Capacity to throttle array
and stow at any stage.
• Hail/snow resistant
Evacuated Tube
• Vacuum
• Not high pressure rated
• Array cannot be turned off.
Safeguarding against
stagnation required
• Limited hail resistance
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 20
MCT vs Evacuated Tubes
MCT
• More efficient at higher
temperatures/ low DNI
• Direct Steam Generation
capability
• Able to be integrated with
two-stage absorption
chillers. Less roof, less
water.
Evacuated Tube
• Increased emissivity
• HX required
• Limited to single-effect
applications
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 21
Solar Cooling 101
Hot Fluid
Concentrator Panels
Absorption Chiller Cool Building
Sunlight
Heat Rejection
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 22
LiBr Double Effect Absorption Chiller
Generator temperatures above 165C/ 330F are required which is
well above what flat plate / evacuated tubes can consistently supply
Double Effect (or Two-Stage) Chillers are twice as efficient as
single effect. Ie COP = 1.35
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 23
NH3 Single Effect Chiller / Thermally Driven Heat Pump
1 Q
0.6 Q 1.6 Q
Combined COP of 2.2!
Equivalent to a Vapour Compression Cycle with Heat Recovery
1 Q
0.6 Q
1.6 Q
12C
7C 21C
54C
99C 116C
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 24
Application for Advanced Heating & Cooling (Benson)
130C
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 25
Solar Cooling Schematic – 25 ton DMS Showcase Abu Dhabi
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 26
Trigeneration Supplementation
Source: Groom Energy
Incremental cost of oversizing absorption chiller is marginal for large
trigeneration systems
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 27
Chromasun 40MW annum San Jose facility
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 28
First OG600 certificated deliveries – 232KW Benson Project
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 29
Benson first lift
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 30
SCU Benson
Peter Le Lievre PAGE 31
Summary
• Chromasun background in large-scale solar
• MCT = ~220 Celsius.
• MCT = rooftop flat panel simplicity
• MCT = utility scale capability
• Now certified to SRCC OG600
• Showcase projects in build
• Widely available in 2011