christmas day 2009: implications for aircrew presented by: philip...
DESCRIPTION
CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010. WHICH WERE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ATTACKS POST-9/11?. DEC 2001: RICHARD REID (FAIL/AIRCREW) NOV 2002: ARKIA (LUCK) MAY 2003: DAVID MARK ROBINSON (AIRCREW) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
GREEN LIGHT LTD.AVIATION SECURITY TRAINING & CONSULTANCY
CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW
PRESENTED BY: PHILIP BAUMWATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010
![Page 2: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WHICH WERE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ATTACKS POST-
9/11? DEC 2001: RICHARD REID (FAIL/AIRCREW) NOV 2002: ARKIA (LUCK) MAY 2003: DAVID MARK ROBINSON
(AIRCREW) AUG 2004: DOMODEDOVO BOMBINGS
(FAIL) SEP 2004: KATO AIR (AIRCREW) OCT 2006: TIRANA HIJACK (AIRCREW) JUN 2007: GLASGOW AIRPORT (FAIL/LUCK) FEB 2008: EAGLE AIR (AIRCREW) MAR 2008: CHINA SOUTHERN (AIRCREW) SEP 2009: AEROMEXICO (FAIL/AIRCREW) DEC 2009: ABDULMUTALLAB
(FAIL/AIRCREW) FEB 2010: AUSTIN (FAIL)
![Page 3: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SCREENING METHODOLOGIES
DESPITE THIS…
COMPARE THE HUGE EXPENDITURE IN SCREENING TECHNOLOGIES vs. INVESTMENT IN AIRCREW TRAINING
![Page 4: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SCREENING METHODOLOGIES
PROBLEM
PROBLEM→SOLUTION
PROBLEM →METHOD →SOLUTION
![Page 5: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SCREENING METHODOLOGIES
SOLUTION FAILS?
YOU DIDN’T UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM
YOU MISUSED THE METHOD
YOU USED THE WRONG METHOD
YOU USED THE WRONG PEOPLE TO USE THE METHOD
![Page 6: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
25 DECEMBER 2009
A “SYSTEMIC FAILURE”…
TO IDENTIFY THE LIKES OF ABDULMUTALLAB
WE DIDN’T UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM
WE USED THE WRONG METHOD
= POOR RISK MANAGEMENT
![Page 7: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
REACTIVE SECURITY
UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB → - BODY SCANNERS- INFLIGHT RESTRICTIONS
- BLACKLISTING CERTAIN COUNTRIES
![Page 8: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT 9/11 COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation:
The TSA and the Congress must give priority attention to improving the ability of screening checkpoints to detect explosives on passengers. As a start, each individual selected for special screening should be screened for explosives. [emphasis added] (p. 393)
![Page 9: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
METAL DETECTION vs. WHOLE BODY IMAGING
COST: AMD: between $5,000 and $20,000Millimetre Wave: around $150,000Backscatter X-ray: between $100k and $200kTransmission: $200,000
THROUGHPUT RATE:AMD: max. 500 pax per hour (no baggage)MMV/Backscatter: approx. 200 per hourTransmission: 150 per hour
![Page 10: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CHECKPOINT COSTTO PROCESS 10,000 PAX PER HOUR
AMD: requires 20 systems, using average equipment
COST: $220,000
In comparison:
MMV/Backscatter: requires 50 systems @ cost of $7,500,000
TRANSMISSION:requires 67 systems @ cost of approx. $15,000,000
![Page 11: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
BODY SCANNING: BACKSCATTER X-RAY
![Page 12: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
BODY SCANNING: BACKSCATTER X-RAY
![Page 13: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
BODY SCANNING: MILLIMETRE WAVE
![Page 14: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
BODY SCANNING: TRANSMISSION X-RAY
![Page 15: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
RADIATION COMPARISON
GROUND LEVEL: 2.4mSv per annum background radiation
FLIGHT:Depends upon altitude and latitude; higher at higher altitudes and closer to the Poles.
Concorde, 12-15 µSv (microsieverts) p/h; Long haul aircraft, 5 µSv (microsieverts) p/h; Short haul aircraft, 1-3 µSv p/h (BA)
![Page 16: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
RADIATION COMPARISON
LIMITS:
20mSv per annum (on average) for Aircrew
1mSv per annum for general public = 200 hours flying per year on subsonic trans-equatorial routes.
AS&E (backscatter) reports 0.09 μSv per scan; the dose for a six hour flight is 200 to 400 times larger at 20 μSv.
1 x SOTER RS (transmission) scan is less than 3 μSv. This is approximately equivalent to a one hour subsonic flight at 10,000 m.
![Page 17: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TRANSMISSION X-RAY COMPARISON
According to a Radiation Metrology Report published in the United Kingdom by the Health Protection Agency’s Radiation Protection Division
Assuming 1 Conpass LD scan = approximately 0.25 μSv
0.25 μSv = 30 minutes of exposure to
naturally occurring background radiation in Cornwall in the UK or Denver, Colorado in the USA = I Conpass LD scan
0.25 μSv = 4g of Brazil nuts ~
consumption of one Brazil nut = 1 Conpass LD scan
5 μSv single dental X-ray = 20 Conpass LD
scans
![Page 18: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
BE VERY AFRAID!!!
![Page 19: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
BODY SCANNING?
IF NOT FOR ALL…
THEN FOR WHO?
![Page 20: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
WHAT IS PROFILING?
A RISK ANALYSIS OF PASSENGERS & SITUATIONS
THROUGH A REASONED APPROACH TO SCREENING
PERFORMED BY A TRAINED STREETWISE WORKFORCE
![Page 21: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DISTURBING FACT
Every day, immigration and customs officials around the world identify people carrying out illegal acts…AFTER they have got off an aircraft.
If we can identify people at that stage, why can’t we do it before they board?
![Page 22: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
DRUG TRAFFICKERS
![Page 23: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CONCEALEMENT EXERCISE:JULY 2009
PROJECT MANAGEMENT:- Green Light Ltd., London, UK
SCREENING TECHNOLOGY:- OD Security, The Netherlands
SCREENING PROPS:- Finnish Security Projects, Helsinki- Quelltex Ltd., UK
![Page 24: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SAUDI SUICIDE BOMBER:27TH AUGUST 2009
Abdullah Hassan al-Aseeri
Assassination attempt on a Saudi Prince during Ramadan
Flown in to attend meeting with Prince
Fully searched
Internal device detonated by mobile phone
![Page 25: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
WHAT IS PASSENGER PROFILING?
APPEARANCE & BEHAVIOUR+
PASSPORT+
ITINERARY+
INTELLIGENCE
+ + +
![Page 26: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
WHAT IS PROFILING?
WE ARE BASELINING...
...and the move towards centralised screening is an impediment to our ability to profile effectively.
![Page 27: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
OBJECTIONS
DISCRIMINATORYSolution: Training
SLOWSolution: It’s not! It’s quicker!
INVASION OF PRIVACYSolution: A necessary evil, just like traffic wardens!
IMPERSONATORSSolution: Far easier to plan to circumvent current checkpoint than pretend to be ‘normal’
![Page 28: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
OBJECTIONS
BUT THE REAL HURDLE TO OVERCOME IS THE REGULATOR...
A REGULATORY NIGHTMARE
![Page 29: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
XMAS DAY 2009:BASIC PROFILING
PAID CASH
TICKET BOUGHT IN GHANA; JOURNEY STARTED IN NIGERIA
ALTERED TICKET ONCE PURCHASED
VISA ISSUED IN UK; UK NOT ON ITINERARY
NO LUGGAGE
PREVIOUS TRAVEL TO YEMEN
![Page 30: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
XMAS DAY 2009:WHAT WENT WRONG?
INTELLIGENCE KNOWN…NOT SUFFICIENTLY ANALYSED
FAMILY CUT-OFF (AND FATHERS REPORT)… NOT LINKED TO TRAVEL HISTORY
OLD VISA IN PLACE…NOT REVOKED
SCREENERS DON’T HAVE ACCESS TO PAX DATA
US AGENTS ON GROUND IN AMSTERDAM… NEVER EVEN SPOKE WITH PASSENGER
SCHEDULED FOR INTERVIEW IN DETROIT
![Page 31: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
BOTTOM LINE:IMPLICATIONS FOR
AIRCREW WILL BE LEFT TO RESPOND TO NEXT ATTACK AS GROUND APPROACH FAILS AGAIN
MORE FRUSTRATED PASSENGERS GOING THROUGH “SILLY SECURITY”
GREATER PROPENSITY FOR AIR RAGE
GREATER FOR PROPENSITY FOR OTHER PASSENGERS TAKING THE LAW INTO THEIR OWN HANDS…AND PARANOID AIRCREW!
AIRCREW BEING REPEATEDLY BODY SCANNED
![Page 32: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
BOTTOM LINE:WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO?
PROVIDE BETTER TRAINING
ALERT CREW TO LATEST THREATS/DEVICES
VALUE THEIR OPINION & ENCOURAGE A REPORTING CULTURE
REMEMBER IT WILL BE DIFFERENT NEXT TIME
![Page 33: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ANNEX 6: DOC 9811GUIDANCE NOTES: CHEM/BIO
“…distinction between the handling of an IED and a chemical/biological weapon.”
“…familiarise crew members with such weaponry.”
“Unexpected exposure to an activated chemical/biological weapon within the confines of an aircraft cabin will require quick identification,clear thinking and swift response.” Is this possible without training?
![Page 34: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ANNEX 6: DOC 9811 2.6.21GUIDANCE NOTES: CHEM/BIO
“Perhaps the most important single factor in assuring a successful outcome to a
CBW incident is for each crew member to consider in advance how he or she would deal with a genuine CHEM/BIO threat in
the airplane.”
![Page 35: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
JUST TO MAKE IT CLEAR...
PROFILING WOULD HAVE IDENTIFIED THIS PASSENGER…BUT NOT ON GROUNDS OF RACE, RELIGION, GENDER, OR COLOUR OF SKIN
NIGERIANS (AND OTHER COUNTRIES) SHOULD NOT BE SET ASIDE FOR SCREENING BECAUSE OF THEIR PASSPORT
…RICHARD REID WAS BRITISH…SO PERHAPS I SHOULD BE SCRENED SPECIALLY!
![Page 36: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
GREEN LIGHT LTD.AVIATION SECURITY TRAINING & CONSULTANCY
CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW
PRESENTED BY: PHILIP BAUMWATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010
![Page 37: CHRISTMAS DAY 2009: IMPLICATIONS FOR AIRCREW Presented by: PHILIP BAUM WATS/SCSI, ORLANDO: 28 APRIL 2010](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062815/5681694a550346895de0e0bd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
GREEN LIGHT LTD.AVIATION SECURITY TRAINING & CONSULTANCY
PHILIP BAUM
MANAGING DIRECTOR, GREEN LIGHT LTD.