chinese oilfield review spring 2000 - schlumberger/media/files/resources/oilfield_review/...elphick...
TRANSCRIPT
Andrew AcockBP Kate Bell Anchala
Ramasamy Sugar Land Leo BurdyloKeng Seng Chang Peter Hegeman Montrouge
Alison Goligher AnchorageDouglas HuppLisa Silipigno David Wylie
FloView FrontSim GHOSTMDT NODAL PatchFlexP LT R S TSqueezeCRETE TPHL USI
WFLExcel MaraSEAL
PrecisionTree Palisade
1 3400
30
Bill BaileyMike CrabtreeJeb Tyrie
Jon Elphick
Fikri Kuchuk
Christian Romano
Leo Roodhart
>
100%
75001190 3 2
1 3340 3
5 5080%
14
312000
>
Capex/Opex
Capex/Opex
Capex/Opex
Capex/Opex
Capex/Opex
Capex/Opex
$0.044$0.050$0.087$0.002$0.034$0.147$0.040$0.147$0.012$0.207$0.033$0.030$0.842$0.074$0.102$0.074$0.589
5.28%6.38%
10.36%0.30%4.09%
17.56%4.81%
17.47%1.48%
24.66%3.99%3.62%100%
8.90%12.16%
8.89%70.05%
$0.044$0.054$0.046$0.003$0.034$0.073$0.041$0.068$0.010$0.122$0.034$0.030$0.559$0.075$0.010$0.075$0.309
7.95%9.62%8.27%0.45%6.16%
12.99%7.25%
12.18%1.79%
21.89%6.01%5.45%100%
13.41%17.87%13.40%55.33%
$0.044$0.054$0.035$0.003$0.034$0.056$0.041$0.047$0.010$0.091
$0..034$0.030$0.478$0.075$0.100$0.075$0.227
9.29%11.24%
7.24%0.52%7.20%
11.64%8.47%9.85%2.09%
19.06%7.03%6.37%100%
15.67%20.88%15.66%47.80%
$0.044$0.054$0.030$0.003$0.034$0.046$0.041$0.030$0.010$0.079$0.034$0.030$0.434$0.075$0.100$0.075$0.184
10.25%12.40%
6.82%0.58%7.94%
10.58%9.34%6.87%2.31%
18.15%7.75%7.02%100%
17.28%23.03%17.27%42.41%
$0.044$0.054$0.049$0.003$0.034$0.081$0.041$0.073$0.011$0.125$0.034$0.030$0.578$0.075$0.101$0.075$0.328
7.69%9.30%8.55%0.43%5.95%
13.92%7.00%
12.63%1.84%
21.61%5.81%5.27%100%
12.96%17.38%12.95%56.71%
20,000 50,000 100,000 200,000
1 7000
1
0.00251.92
1.2$0.028
$1,000,000.00300,000
$1,600,000.00$400,000.00
1,000,0009,000,000
$0.04
3 @ 90% @ 90%
$/
1 7000
1
$600,000.00200,000
$1,000,000.0032,850,000
$0.03
3 3 $/
> Capex Opex20 000 200 000 3181 31810 3
> WORA
WOR B CD
10
1.5
32
1.0
0W
OR
WOR
A
B
C
D
1. Kuchuk F Sengul M Zeybek M Oilfield WaterA Vital Resource 22 1999 11
22 4-13
2. Kuchuk F Patra SK Narasimbam JL Ramanan SBanerji S Water watching 22
1999 11 22 14-23 Kuchuk F
>
WOR
WOR
50%
332000
FrontSim
50%
Sengul M The Challenge of Water Control22 1999 11 22 24-43
3. WOR0 100% 100%
WOR 1 50% WORWOR
>
>
WOR
10
10
WFLTPHL
FlowView
WFL
0.01
kv>0.01Kh
OWC
> > >
34
WOR
>
4. Elphick J Seright R A Classification of WaterProblem Types
1997 8 6-8
5. Hill D Neme E Ehlig-Economides C Mollinedo M8
3 1996 4-17
6.
>
> > >
352000
OWC
OWC
WOR
50 15
OWC
OWC
>
36
6
>
>
•
•
•
>
WOR
WOR
WOR
>
>
372000
10,000
1000
0
100
10
1
0.110 100 10,0001000
1000
100
10
1
0.1120,00080,000 100,00060,0000 20,000 40,000
WOR
WOR
WOR
OWC
WOR
WOR
X590 X950 X180 X290360 110
165 50OWC
GOC
WOR
>
WORWOR 1 10 WOR
WORWOR
38
100
10
1.0
0.1
WOR
WOR
100
10
1
0.0001
0.1
0.01
0.001
WOR
100
10
1
0.000110,0001000100101
0.1
0.01
0.001
WOR
WOR
WOR'
WOR'
WOR
10
1.0
0.1
0.01
0.0011000 2000 3000 4000 5000
WOR
1
2 34
>
1800 2400 2800
X590 X670X204
WOR
X670
MDT
WOR
WOR
>
1800 1 WOR
2100 WOR 2WOR
14% 2400 3
WOR WOR 0.2410%
4
7. Chan KS Water Control Diagnostic Plots SPE30775 SPE
1995 10 22-25
8. Yortsos YC Youngmin C Zhengming Y Shah PCAnalysis and Interpretation of Water/Oil Ratio in Water-
floods SPE Journal 4 4 199912 413-424
392000
X590
X680
X770
X860
X950300025002000150010005000
3000
2000
1000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
100 , 4
20 , 20 14,000 1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
12,000
10,000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0 200 400 600 800 1000
WOR
Liquid rate
7000 1112 3 40064 3
WOR
WORWOR
NODAL
NODAL
NODAL
WOR
355
290004608 3 90%
>
50% WOR
> NODAL NODAL
9. Elphick J NODAL Analysis Shows Increased OilProduction Following Water Shutoff
1996 8 19-21
10.Beggs HD Production Optimization Using NODALAnalysis OGCIPublications 1991
11.
NODALPLT
NODAL
6
40
•
PVT
•
•
•
-5000 0 5000 10,000 15,000 20,000
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
-6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000
L1
L2
L3
L4
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
L3
L4
> NODALNODAL 2 5
1
• PLT
•
NODAL
5
1-42966 4294 471
682 3 26510 127424212 2025 3
>
412000
42
1 2 53 4
4613 733 3
3 0 047 3 4 5
PS PLAFFORM
[12]
[13]
PSPLATFORMGHOST
R S T P r o G H O S TFloView
TPHL WFL
WFL GHOSTTPHL
50%
GHOSTX137>
X200
X300
X400
X500
X600
> 90°
TPHL TPHL
X070 X055
GHOST
1 0
WFL
1 0API20 70
85 95 WFL
0 500 0 1200 0 25,000
USI
432000
X100
X200
X300
508 3
NODAL
MDT RFT
X100
X000
5200 5400 5600 5800 6000 6200 6400
X300
X500
X700
X400
X600
X200
Tarbut
Ness
Etive
Rannoch
12. Lenn C Kuchuk F Rounce J Hook P HoricontalWell Performance Evaluation and Fluid Entrymechanisms SPE 49089 SPE
1998 9 28-30
13. A khnoukh R Leighton J Bigno Y Bouroumeau-fusean P Quin E Catala G Sil ipigno LHemmingway J Horkowitz J Herue X WhittakerC Kusaka K Markel D Martin A
11 11999 30-47
14. Hegeman P Pelissier-Combescure J9
2 1997 16-20
15. Al Shahri Am AL Ubaidan AA Kibsgaard P Kuchuk F Monitoring Areal Vertical Sweep andReservoir Pressure in the Ghawar Field UsingMultiprobe Wire line Formation Tester SPE48956
SPE1998 9 28-30
>
USI
> MDT
PosiSet
PatchFlex
MDT
2.3 0.7
PosiSet
PatchFlex
1 2.5
PatchFlex
> PosiSET PosiSET
> PatchFlex PatchFlex
44
B
C
A
D
D E
E
C
D
B
A
8 5 % 1 0 % P SPLATFORM
1.2RST
RST
PatchFlex
SqueezeCRETE
160
SqueezeCRETE
MaraSEAL OrganoSEAL-R
51000 10000 159
1589 3
M a r c i tOrganoSEAL-F
3
>
>
16.Crombie A Haiford F Hashem M McNeal R ThomasEC Melbourne G Mullins OC
10 31998 26-41
17.Boisnauit JM Guillot D Bourahla A Tirlia T DahlT Holmes C Raiturkar AM Maroy P Moffett CMejia GP Martinez IR Revil P Roemer R
111 1999 16-29
18. 25
19.O.Brien W Stratton JJ Lane RH MechanisticReservoir Modeling Improves Fissure Treatment GelDesign in Horizontal Injectors Idd EI Shargi NorthDome Field Qatar SPE 56743 SPE
1999 10 3-6
452000
ACP
ACP
OWC
>
>
>
46
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
75% 80% 85%
95% 96% 97%
95% 96% 97%
75% 80% 85%
75% 80% 85%
QRA
PalisadePrecisionTree Excel
•
•
•
•
20.Elphick J Fletcher P Crabtree M Techniques forZonal Isolation in Horizontal wells
Reading 1998 11 4-5
21.Hill 5
22.
>
472000
1
2
5
10
WaterCASE
100 20%90% 60%
•156
• 85 20
•
25• 15 15
QRA
50
25%
> FrontSim
105 1 2 510
48
>WaterCASE
WaterCASE
492000
1.0
0.75
0.5
0.25
0.00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
%
A B
95%
38%
58%
9%
13%
17%
15% 5%
27%
27%
WOR
WOR
0.5-1.0%
10 40ppm10-50
20%80%
A
B
17% 13%9% 14%
15% 27% 5%50
6000-80001828-2438 1000 159 3
5000 795 3
>
>
50
Framo
40ppm5ppm
95%
Dacion LASMO PlcApertura
1 9 9 8 4LASMO-
•
50%50% 20000 3178 3
60% 8000012712 3 10000
30000 1589-4767 3
• 36000057204 3 75%
9000014300 3
•
90%600000 95340
3 30000
14% 35%
RH
>
23.Dake Lp The Practice of Reservoir Engineering,Developments of Petroleum Science 36
Elsevier 1994 445-450
24.Crabtree M Eslinger D Fletcher P Miller M JohnsonA King G 11
3 1999 30-45
512000