china's liaoning navy aircraft...

2
62 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 63 O n 13 March 2012, the deputy commander of China’s navy, Adm. Xu Hongmeng, announced his country’s first operational aircraft carrier would be commis- sioned by year’s end. The carrier had just finished its fourth set of sea trials, and it initiated its fifth a month later. Referred to at the time as the ex-Varyag (Varangian, after a prominent medi- eval Russ-Viking tribe), many commentators believed the car- rier would ultimately be named after the Manchu admiral who conquered Taiwan in 1683: Shi Lang, but it was commissioned in September 2012 as the Liaoning, after that Chinese province. Essentially a modification of Russia’s Varyag carrier, the Liaoning displaces approximately 70,000 tons fully loaded and can carry an air wing of up to 35 Russian-built Su-30s along with 18 helicopters. Western commentators believe much of the ship’s internal systems are already obsolescent and its capabili- ties are inferior to those of America’s nuclear aircraft carriers. Nonetheless, the carrier will elevate the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) into the status of a global naval power. More importantly, the carrier’s potential to project power eclipses that of all other navies in the Far East with the exception of that of the US. That fact brings with it strategic implications that go beyond the ship’s exact capabilities. Given China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea, and its assertion those waters constitute part of its national territory, few Southeast Asian nations will take lightly the Liaoning’s entry into service. Construction China’s carrier has been a long time coming, and its cre- ation and deployment haven’t been without opposition inside the regime. Though Mao Tse-tung recognized the value of aircraft carriers, while in power he emphasized massive ground forces. Post-Mao PLAN leaders, however, saw carriers as an essential component to their aspirations for a blue water navy. The problem was finding the money to finance such a multi-ship force, and then developing the industrial and technical base to create and support it. China lacked both those things before Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms began to take hold. With a view to the future, the Communist Party approved the study of carriers and their operations in the early 1980s. They acquired the decommissioned Australian carrier HMAS Melbourne in 1985 and studied it intensely. They also purchased the former-Soviet Vertical Take Off & Landing (VTOL) carriers Kiev and Minsk (though both those ships eventually became amusement park attractions rather than operational naval units). China’s offer to buy the decommis- sioned French carrier Clemenceau in 1997 came to naught. Throughout it all, the debate over aircraft carriers’ costs and military utility dominated China’s Communist Party and military media. One school of thought within the navy argued submarines would be the capital ships of the 21 st century, while some party leaders pointed out the USSR had collapsed due, Navy China's Liaoning Aircraft Carrier By Carl O. Schuster 62 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 63

Upload: ngoanh

Post on 06-Feb-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: China's Liaoning Navy Aircraft Carriermodernwarmagazine.com/mwm/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MW18-SA… · operational naval units). China’s offer to buy the ... Air Wing 35 Fighters,

62 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 63

O n 13 March 2012 , the deputy commander of China’s navy, Adm. Xu Hongmeng, announced his country’s fi rst operational aircraft carrier would be commis-

sioned by year’s end. The carrier had just fi nished its fourth set of sea trials, and it initiated its fi fth a month later. Referred to at the time as the ex-Varyag (Varangian, after a prominent medi-eval Russ-Viking tribe), many commentators believed the car-rier would ultimately be named after the Manchu admiral who conquered Taiwan in 1683: Shi Lang, but it was commissioned in September 2012 as the Liaoning, after that Chinese province.

Essentially a modifi cation of Russia’s Varyag carrier, the Liaoning displaces approximately 70,000 tons fully loaded and can carry an air wing of up to 35 Russian-built Su-30s along with 18 helicopters. Western commentators believe much of the ship’s internal systems are already obsolescent and its capabili-ties are inferior to those of America’s nuclear aircraft carriers.

Nonetheless, the carrier will elevate the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) into the status of a global naval power. More importantly, the carrier’s potential to project power eclipses that of all other navies in the Far East with the exception of that of the US. That fact brings with it strategic implications that go beyond the ship’s exact capabilities. Given China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea, and its assertion those waters constitute part of its national territory, few Southeast Asian nations will take lightly the Liaoning’s entry into service.

Construction

China’s carrier has been a long time coming, and its cre-ation and deployment haven’t been without opposition inside the regime. Though Mao Tse-tung recognized the value of aircraft carriers, while in power he emphasized massive ground forces. Post-Mao PLAN leaders, however, saw carriers as an essential component to their aspirations for a blue water navy.

The problem was fi nding the money to fi nance such a multi-ship force, and then developing the industrial and technical base to create and support it. China lacked both those things before Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms began to take hold. With a view to the future, the Communist Party approved the study of carriers and their operations in the early 1980s. They acquired the decommissioned Australian carrier HMAS Melbourne in 1985 and studied it intensely. They also purchased the former-Soviet Vertical Take Off & Landing (VTOL) carriers Kiev and Minsk (though both those ships eventually became amusement park attractions rather than operational naval units). China’s offer to buy the decommis-sioned French carrier Clemenceau in 1997 came to naught.

Throughout it all, the debate over aircraft carriers’ costs and military utility dominated China’s Communist Party and military media. One school of thought within the navy argued submarines would be the capital ships of the 21st century, while some party leaders pointed out the USSR had collapsed due,

n 13 March 2012 , the deputy commander of China’s navy, Adm. Xu Hongmeng, announced his country’s

NavyChina's Liaoning Aircraft Carrier By Carl O. Schuster

62 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 63

Page 2: China's Liaoning Navy Aircraft Carriermodernwarmagazine.com/mwm/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MW18-SA… · operational naval units). China’s offer to buy the ... Air Wing 35 Fighters,

64 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 MODERN WAR 18 | JUL–AUG 2015 65

delayed its delivery for nearly three years. The ex-Varyag arrived at China’s Dalian ship yard in 2003 minus its propulsion and combat systems.

Beijing purchased the ship’s blueprints from the Ukraine that year for a mere USD 2 million. The ship’s modifi cation and refurbishment began in secret two years later. It’s retained its bow “ski ramp,” and China bought four Russian-made arresting wire landing systems for the ship in 2009.

At the time, they didn’t purchase any SS-N-19 anti-ship cruise missiles that would normally equip that class of

carrier. Aircraft deployed on such ships are generally fi ghters for air defense, with missiles providing offensive punch. Helicopters are also normally carried for anti-submarine missions.

Selected PLAN Air Force (PLANAF) pilots had been undergoing shipboard training for possible future carrier deployment since 1987. By 2009 the PLAN had a cadre of over 200 graduates from that program, which included experience aboard surface combatants and training with comput-er simulations for carrier operations.

Work on the ex-Varyag progressed slowly, due to uncertainty about what modifi cations and equipment would best come to suit PLAN requirements rather than to budgetary or security concerns. The wraps fi nally came

off on 7 June 2011, when Gen. Chen Bingde, the PLA’s chief of the general staff, offi cially announced China was “building” an aircraft carrier.

That announcement was followed, on 13 July, by a Hong Kong television report showing the PLAN training ship AXT-88 tying up at the Dalian Shipyard for the purpose of training the carrier’s commissioning crew. The carrier conducted several sea trials in 2012, all reported as successful.

Exercises & Training

Typically, a crew’s pre-commis-sioning training and preparation process is 12 to 14 months for a new carrier, followed by another six to eight months of operational “work up” train-

ing. Given the PLAN’s inexperience with carrier operations and its lack of carrier-capable aircraft, those time frames will be longer. Nonetheless, the publicity about the carrier is indicative of the ship’s present political impor-tance as a symbol of national pride.

Operationally the Liaoning’s early activities have focused on honing the crew’s skills, especially that of the air wing. As the crew and fl eet improve their skills, and the leadership becomes more confi dent, the carrier’s area of operations will expand.

The carrier will also work with the 2nd Artillery Division, which controls China’s strategic and ballistic missile forces, including anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) units. Also, given the ship’s importance as a national

Navy

and launch systems via a spy ring operating from within the Ukraine’s Saki airfi eld, where Soviet carrier systems research had been conducted.

The incomplete and abandoned Admiral Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier Varyag became available when Russia refused to buy it from the newly independent Ukraine. A gambling consortium based in Macao (a “special administrative region” of China) purchased it in 1998 for USD 20 million, ostensibly as a tourist attrac-tion and casino. Turkish objections to its passage through the Bosporus

at least in part, to excessive military spending, especially in trying to create a blue water navy. Though that debate inhibited the PLAN’s pursuit of carriers, China’s rapidly growing economy and global trade provided the funding for further study. That trade also generated a perceived need for expanded PLAN operations.

The PLAN commissioned several design studies on carriers from a vari-ety of countries, including Spain and Russia. China also bought the blue-prints for the Kiev-class while acquir-ing information on Soviet-era catapult

Specifi cations

Displacement 70,000 tons (full load)

Dimensions 1,001 x 116 x 36 feet*

Propulsion Steam Turbine 4 Propellers

Max Speed 30+ knots

Air Wing 35 Fighters, 18 Helicopters

Armament 4 x FL-3000 SAM, 6 x 30mm CIWS**

Crew 1,600 (crew) & 900 (air wing)

Notes*The fl ight deck is 236’ wide

at its widest point.**Close In Weapon System

A jet from the ship's compliment practices takeoffs and landings.