china 6.6 6.2 6.0 2.1 1.9 2.5 india 7.4 7.6 7.8 3.8 4.0 4 ... · corporate spreads have become...
TRANSCRIPT
In the US, activity has been buoyant so far, largely thanks to tax cuts For the foreseeable period, a landing is more than a
possibility Interest rates hikes and tariffs increases on worth $300bn of imports will start to weigh on firms profitability, then activity
The downward adjustment could be sizeable in highly leveraged sectors such as energy and IT As a consequence, the monetary
tightening would mark a pause Long term-bond yields would also stabilize, below the 3pct level.
The Euro area, growth is sharply decelerating, with some countries like Italy now in recession Extra and intra EU trade is less
dynamic, in line with fading external demand, in particular coming from EMEs Inflation is expected to come-back below the 2pct
level, as a consequence of falling oil prices The ECB will stop its net asset purchases as off the 1st January of 2019, while keeping
rates unchanged up to the end of year This may cause a (slight) rebound in bond yields as well as in the value of euro.
% 2018 e 2019 e 2020 e 2018 e 2019 e 2020 e
Advanced 2.2 1.5 1.2 2.0 1.5 1.7
United-States 2.9 2.1 1.5 2.4 1.8 2.0
Japan 0.9 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.6 1.4
Euro Area 1.8 1.0 1.1 1.7 1.4 1.4
Germany 1.5 0.9 1.1 1.8 1.6 1.6
France 1.5 1.2 1.2 2.1 1.3 1.6
Italy 0.8 0.1 0.5 1.3 1.0 1.0
Spain 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.7 1.0 1.3
Emerging 5.9 5.9 5.7 2.7 2.7 3.1
China 6.6 6.2 6.0 2.1 1.9 2.5
India 7.4 7.6 7.8 3.8 4.0 4.1
Brazil 1.3 3.0 2.5 3.7 3.8 3.6
Russia 1.8 1.7 1.6 2.8 3.6 4.2
Source : BNP Paribas Group Economic Research (e: Estimates & forecasts,)
GDP Growth Inflation
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
2
Interest rates, % 2018 2019 ######## ######## ########
End of period Q1 Q2 Q3e Q4e Q1e Q2e Q3e Q4e 2018 2019e 2020e
US Fed Funds 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.75 2.75
Libor 3m $ 2.31 2.34 2.40 2.81 2.80 3.05 3.05 3.00 2.81 3.00 3.00
T-Notes 10y 2.75 2.86 3.06 2.69 2.80 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.69 2.80 2.50
Ezone ECB Refi 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Euribor 3m -0.33 -0.32 -0.32 -0.31 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30 -0.30 -0.31 -0.30 -0.25
Bund 10y 0.50 0.31 0.47 0.25 0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.25 0.40 0.40
OAT 10y 0.60 0.62 0.75 0.71 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.70 0.71 0.70 0.70
UK Base rate 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.25 0.75 1.25 1.25
Gilts 10y 1.39 1.33 1.48 1.27 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.10 1.27 2.10 2.10
Japan BoJ Rate -0.07 -0.07 -0.06 -0.07 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.07 -0.10 -0.10
JGB 10y 0.04 0.03 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.05 0.00 -0.05 -0.20
Exchange Rates 2018 2019
End of period Q1 Q2 Q3e Q4e Q1e Q2e Q3e Q4e 20.18 2019e 2020e
USD EUR / USD 1.23 1.17 1.16 1.14 1.15 1.17 1.21 1.25 1.14 1.25 1.34
USD / JPY 106.35 110.77 113.59 109.72 110.00 108.00 105.00 100.00 109.72 100.00 90.00
EUR EUR / GBP 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.90 0.85 0.85
EUR / CHF 1.18 1.16 1.13 1.13 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.20 1.13 1.20 1.25
Source : BNPP GlobalMarkets (e: Estimates & forecasts)
3 Euro-dollar 4 Interest rates
Euro vs Dollar
Spot price
1,13
1,00
1,10
1,20
1,30
1,40
1,50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
11-févr.
▬ United States, 10y Government Bond Yield
▪▪▪ Germany, 10y Government Bond Yield
2,66%
0,12%
11-févr.
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
US-GER Spread
5 Interest rates 6 Oil market
▬ France, 10y Government Bond Yield
▪▪▪ Germany, 10y Government Bond Yield
0,12%0,56%
11-févr.
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Oil Price, Brent
USD per barrel, spot
40
120
80
100
60 61
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
11-févr.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
3
7 US, business climate 8 US, investment cycle vs corporate profits
▬ ISM Manufacturing
▪▪▪ ISM Manufacturing, new orders component
45
50
55
60
65
70
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ Corporate Profits after tax, % GVA [LHS]
▪▪▪ Corporate Fixed investment, % of GVA [RHS]
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
2%
6%
10%
14%
1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
The business climate is now deteriorating. Corporate investment and profits are now relatively far along in
the cycle.
9 US, domestic oil market recovers 10 US, consumption
▬ Oil production, m/bd [LHS]
▪▪▪ Number of drillings [RHS]
0
300
600
900
1 200
1 500
1 800
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▌Private consumption, 3m/3m, ann. [LHS]
▬ Retail sales, vol., 3m/3m, ann. [RHS]
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
-6%
-3%
0%
3%
6%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
car sales (adjusted to scale)
After dropping sharply, the number of drillings is on the rise
again. US oil production is also recovering, matching all times
high.
Very strong in Q3, correcting in Q4.
11 US, housing market on a good shape 12 US, housing market on a good shape
▬ NAHB Index [RHS]
▪▪▪ Housing starts, x1000 [LHS]
0
30
60
90
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
▬ Inventories, Months of sales [RHS]
▪▪▪ Housing starts, x1000 [LHS]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
The NAHB index is down from peak
First signs of peaking. Inventories are up in month of sales.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
4
13 US, non-farm payrolls vs unemployment rate 14 US, labour force participation rate
▌Nonfarm payrolls, monthly change, x1000 [LHS]
▬ Unemployment rate [RHS]
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Participation rate
20-64 aged population
75%
76%
77%
78%
79%
80%
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
The US unemployment rate is below 4%, the lowest since 18
year.
The participation rate among the working age population (20-64
year) has reverted upward, a further indication that the labour
market is in better shape.
15 US, muted tensions over prices 16 US, some tensions over wages
▬ CPI Headline, yy
▪▪▪ CPI Core, yy ——CPI Energy, yy [RHS]
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
XAxis: Unemployment rate
YAxis: Real hourly wage rate
31/12/18
R² = 0,64
-2,5%
0,0%
2,5%
3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%
Energy was largely responsible for the past upturn in headline
inflation. However, core inflation (excluding food and energy) is
now slightly accelerating.
Real hourly wage growth is now accelerating (coming from zero).
However, it is still below the path suggested by a traditional
Phillips curve.
17 US, credit to corporates keeps healthy 18 US, higher leverage in corporate sector
▌Credit to corporate*, net flows, an $bn [LHS]
▬ Banks tightening credit, % [RHS]
-30
0
30
60
90
-600
-300
0
300
600
900
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Corporate debt, % GVA [LHS]
▪▪▪ Corporate profit after tax, % GVA [RHS]
4%
8%
12%
16%
60%
80%
100%
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Thanks to accommodating credit conditions, credit flows to
corporates (loans & bond issues) have returned to healthy pre-
crisis levels.
A cause for future concern? US companies are heavily in debt
again, while their profitability is peaking, a configuration that has
often preceded recessions.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
5
19 US, low corporate spreads 20 US, corporate net debt by sectors
▬ United-States, BBB Corporate Bond Spread, Bps
▪▪▪ Oil Price, Brent, USD per Barrel [RHS]
25
50
75
100
125
150
200
250
300
350
400
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Net debt / EBITDA 2016 2004-06
Corporate spreads have become sensitive to oil prices in the US.
One explanation is the size of the highly-leveraged shale oil
sector.
The energy sector has considerably increased its net debt ratio
since the “revolution” of shale gas and oil took place.
21 US, Fed funds rate and core inflation 22 US, flatter yields curve
▬ CPI Core
▪▪▪ Fed Funds Target Rate
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Yield Curve, 2y-10y
▌Recession periods
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
The Fed funds rate has ticked upwards, coming close to the core
inflation level.
The normalizing monetary conditions are illustrated by flatter
yield curve.
23 US, dollar effective exchange rates 24 US, external accounts
Dollar, real effective exchange rate
1973 = 100
80
90
100
110
120
130
1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Current account balance
% GDP
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Looking at the real effective exchange rate (trade weighted &
adjusted for inflation), the dollar looks to be on the expensive
side.
External deficits have stopped narrowing.
R.ESTATE
UTILITIES
ENERGY
TELECOM
CO.DISCR
INDUSTR.
MATERIALS
CO.STAPLE
HEALTHC.
IT
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
6
25 China, various activity indicators 26 China, change in growth determinants
▬ GDP, yy
▪▪▪ Electr. Output, yy ——Industrial Output
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ US Households Debt Ratio, % GDP [LHS]
▪▪▪ China, Exports, % GDP [RHS]
10%
20%
30%
40%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Electricity and industrial output both in line with GDP growth (at
around 6% annually).
Bent on deleveraging, US consumers are importing less from
China.
27 China, investment has come down 28 China, credit
▬ Fixed investment, % GDP
▪▪▪ Private consumption, % GDP
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Credit outstanding as % of GDP
▬ Total ----Bank lending
100%
150%
200%
250%
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
Bonds, entrusted loans, bank's
acceptances, financial trusts...
Consumption is still relatively low in terms of GDP (less than
40%)
China has the highest internal debt ratio of the emerging
countries.
29 China, trade surpluses remain large 30 China, leading the Commodity cycle
Trade balance (% GDP)
▬Total ▌Excluding Food&Energy ▌Food&Energy
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Cement output in China, yy [LHS]
▪▪▪ CRB World Commodity Prices Index, yy [RHS]
-35%
0%
35%
70%
-15%
0%
15%
30%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
External surpluses are still huge, even though they have
narrowed somewhat since mid-2016 (rebound in oil prices).
The Chinese cement industry seems to edge back toward
recession, which has negative implication for commodity
markets.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
7
31 Euro area, lagging behind 32 Euro area, GDP growth vs business surveys
GDP, vol. (2008 = 100)
▬ United States ▪▪▪ Euro Area
80
100
120
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
▌GDP, q/q, ann. [LHS]
▬ PMI composite [RHS]
45
50
55
60
-2%
0%
2%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Although growth has accelerated, it still lags behind the US. Still down.
33 Germany, GDP growth vs business surveys 34 France, GDP Growth vs business surveys
▌GDP, q/q, ann. [LHS]
▬ PMI composite [RHS] ▪▪▪ PMI Manuf. [RHS]
40
45
50
55
60
65
-2%
0%
2%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▌GDP, q/q, ann. [LHS]
▬ PMI composite [RHS] ▪▪▪ PMI Manuf. [RHS]
40
45
50
55
60
65
-2%
0%
2%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Back to more normal levels after having rocketed. The fall in Q3
GDP is partly accidental and should be corrected in Q4.
However, the global trend appears less favourable.
A downward trend, accentuated by the “gilets jaunes” protests in
18’Q4.
35 France, peaking housing? 36 France, booming car registrations
▬ Housing Starts, ann. x1000 [LHS]
▪▪▪ Home Builders Business Outlook Index [RHS]
-50
-25
0
25
300
350
400
450
500
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
New car registrations
Monthly , x1000
100
150
200
250
1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
After having returned to cyclical peaks (more than 400K annual
starts) the housing activity in France is set to normalize.
A surge in Aug. ahead of more stringent technical standards. A
downward correction occurred last autumn.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
8
37 Italy, GDP growth vs business surveys 38 Spain, GDP growth vs business surveys
▌GDP, q/q, ann. [LHS]
▬ PMI composite [RHS] ▪▪▪ PMI Manuf. [RHS]
40
45
50
55
60
65
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▌GDP, q/q, ann. [LHS]
▬ PMI composite [RHS] ▪▪▪ PMI Manuf. [RHS]
40
45
50
55
60
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Back to zero or even below… Still good, albeit losing some momentum
39 Euro area, fixed investment vs cap. utilization rate 40 Euro area, corporate fixed investment vs profits
▬ Corporate, Mach. & equipt. investment % of GDP [LHS]
▪▪▪ Capacity utilisation rate [RHS]
77%
82%
87%
6%
7%
8%
1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Corporate Mach. & Equipt. investment, % GDP [LHS]
▪▪▪ Corporate profit margin index, 2007=100 [LHS]
94
96
98
100
102
6%
7%
8%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Higher capacity utilisation rates… … and upward profit margins have triggered an upturn in
corporate investment. Now peaking?
41 France, fixed investment vs corporate profit 42 France, fixed investment vs corporate debt
▬ Corporate Fixed Investment, % of GVA (LHS)
▪▪▪ Corporate Operating Earnings, % GVA (RHS)
28%
30%
32%
34%
36%
21%
23%
25%
27%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Corporate Fixed Investment, % of GVA (LHS)
▪▪▪ Corporate Debt, % GDP (RHS)
50%
60%
70%
80%
21%
23%
25%
27%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Investment in France has been rather resilient compared to other
countries, and despite various trends in corporate profits.
Credit has been a support factor for investment in France.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
9
43 Corporate debt ratio, diverging trends 44 Euro area, trend in corporate fixed investment
Nonfinancial corporate debt, % GDP
▬ Germany ▪▪▪ France
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
Investment in Mach. & Equipt., 2008 = 100 (vol.)
▬ Spain ▪▪▪ Italy
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
The French corporate debt has surged over the past decade.
However, this is largely due to big companies, which are also
cash rich. The net debt ratio is not so high.
Corporate investment revives in keeping with profit margins, but
not at the same pace across the board.
45 Euro area, current accounts show large surpluses 46 Euro area, trend in exports
Current account balance
% GDP
-2,0%
-1,0%
0,0%
1,0%
2,0%
3,0%
4,0%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ Intra-EU Exports, vol., 2013=100
▪▪▪ Extra EU Exports, vol., 2013=100
90
100
110
120
130
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
At a record high. Down both inside and outside EU, a further confirmation that
global trade is weakening
47 Euro Area, credit to corporates vs bank lending survey 48 Spain, credit to corporates (<1y, EUR 1mn)
▌Credit to Corporates, EURbn, an. [LHS]
▬ Banks tightening, % [RHS] ▪▪▪ Banks Expected demand, % [RHS]
-30
-15
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
Credit to corporates, EURbn, <1y & EUR 1mn
▬ 12m cumulated net flows ▪▪▪ Monthly net flows (annualized)
-200
-100
0
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
The ECB bank lending surveys are improving as lending
standards return to normal. Corporate credit has slowly
recovered since 2015.
Credit to corporates (under 1 year and EUR 1mn) is stable in
Spain.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
10
49 Euro area, financing conditions have improved 50 Euro area, consumer credit
Bank's lending rates to corporates (<1Y & EUR 1mn)
▬ France ▪▪▪ Italy ——Spain
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Euro are consumer credit
12m cumulated flows, EURbn
-25
0
25
50
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
The convergence of lending rates signals a reduction in
fragmentation.
Consumer credit is firmly back in positive territory.
51 Euro area, base money surge with the QE 52 Euro area, M3 growth vs core inflation
Money base
▌R.Reserves ▌Ex.Reserves ▌D. Facility
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ CPI Core, yy [RHS]
▪▪▪ M3, yy [RHS]
-3%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
0%
1%
2%
3%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
The ECB’s TLTRO programme temporarily inflated the money
base (bank holdings with the ECB), then growing with QE.
M3 growth is decelerating
53 Euro area, inflation still subdued 54 Euro Area, ECB “refi” rate vs determinants
▬ CPI Headline, yy
▪▪▪ CPI Core, yy ——CPI Energy, yy [RHS]
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ ECB Refi
▪▪▪ CPI Core, yy ——Unemployment Rate [RHS]
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
The core inflation rate is trending around 1% per year. The
fluctuation in headline figure is mainly caused by energy.
The refi has held at 0.0% since March 16, 2016, while the
deposit facility rate (DFR) is negative at -0.40%. The decline in
UR normally calls for normalisation, but not this time…
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
11
55 Italian 10 year rates 56 Spanish 10 year rates
▬ Italy , 10y Government Bond Yield
▪▪▪ Italy , 2y Government Bond Yield
2,90%
0,60%
11-févr.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ Spain, 10y Government Bond Yield
▪▪▪ Spain, 2y Government Bond Yield
1,37%
-0,15%
11-févr.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Rebounding, amid political uncertainties. Still relatively low.
57 France, over several maturities 58 Euro-dollar
France, Government Bond Yields
▬ 10y ▪▪▪ 5y ——2y
0,56%
-0,20%
11-févr.
-0,49%-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
▬ Euro vs Dollar, 2017=100
▪▪▪ Euro Nominal Effective Exchange rate, 2017=100
90
100
110
120
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Sources : Thomson Datastream, BNP Paribas Sources : Thomson Datastream, BNP Paribas
Still very low by historical standard, at all maturities. Correcting from the 2017’ rebound.
59 Euro-dollar vs capital flows 60 Euro-dollar vs ECB’s balance sheet
▬ EUR vs USD [RHS]
▌Direct & Portfolio Investments to/from (+/-) EMU, EURbn
1,00
1,10
1,20
1,30
1,40
1,50
-900
-600
-300
0
300
600
2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ ECB's Balance Sheet, Total Assets, EURbn [LHS]
▪▪▪ Euro vs Dollar
1,00
1,10
1,20
1,30
1,40
1,50
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
4 000
4 500
5 000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Net capital outflows from the EMU (direct and portfolio
investments) still important but reducing.
Lower range of fluctuation after QE.
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
12
61 US, S&P500 Trend in Operating earnings 62 US, S&P500 index vs operating earnings
▬ Operating Earnings Per Share, Annual, USD, Trend
▪▪▪ Operating Earnings Per Share, Annual, USD, Spot
140$
60$
80$
100$
120$
160$
2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
▬ S&P500, Index, 1941-43 = 10 [LHS]
▪▪▪ Operating Earnings Per Share, Annual, USD, Spot [RHS]
800
1 000
1 500
2 500
2 000
3 000 156$
2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
40$
Earnings per share are now far above their long-term trend. Correcting at the turn of the year.
63 US, S&P 500 “Fed model” 64 Euro Area, 10y Yield spreads vs public debt…
▬ S&P 500, Price-to-Earnings Ratio
▌S&P 500 Risk Premium
10
15
20
25
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
X Axis: Gross debt as % of GDP (2016)
Y Axis: 10y y ield spread vs Germany (11-2-19)
FR
IT
ES
NL
BE
AT
PT
FI IR 0
100
200
300
50 75 100 125 150
The PE ratio (based on trend EPS) is high, but the risk premium
on the “risk-free” rate (Treasuries) is not so low.
… with some details (European Commission estimates)
GDP Gen. Gov. fiscal balance Interests payment Public debt
Total Primary Struct. Total
2018 €bn €bn %GDP %GDP %GDP €bn %GDP Av. rate €bn %GDP Rating S&P
Germany 3 392 53,3 1,6 2,5 1,4 31,4 0,9 1,5 2 040 60,1 AAA
France 2 352 -61,7 -2,6 -0,8 -2,5 43,6 1,9 1,9 2 321 98,7 AA
Italy 1 767 -34,0 -1,9 1,7 -1,8 64,6 3,7 2,9 2 316 131,1 BBB
Spain 1 213 -32,4 -2,7 -0,3 -3,1 29,1 2,4 2,5 1 176 96,9 A-
Netherlands 773 8,4 1,1 1,9 0,3 6,2 0,8 1,5 411 53,2 AAA
Belgium 455 -4,5 -1,0 1,4 -1,3 10,7 2,4 2,4 462 101,4 AA
Austria 386 -1,3 -0,3 1,3 -0,8 6,2 1,6 2,1 288 74,5 AA+
Greece 185 1,2 0,6 3,9 4,0 5,9 3,2 1,9 338 182,5 B+
Portugal 202 -1,5 -0,7 2,7 -0,9 7,0 3,5 2,9 245 121,4 BBB-
Finland 232 -1,8 -0,8 0,1 -0,8 2,0 0,9 1,5 139 59,8 AA+
Ireland 322 -0,4 -0,1 1,5 -0,2 5,2 1,6 2,6 206 63,9 A+
EMU 11 606 -73,3 -0,6 1,2 -0,7 215,6 1,9 2,2 10 085 86,9
UK 2 391 -30,9 -1,3 1,2 -1,8 58,7 2,5 2,9 2 056 86,0 AA
EU 15 901 -109,4 -0,7 1,2 -1,7 295,4 1,9 2,3 12 945 81,4
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
13
Group Economic Research
EcoCharts// February 19 economic-research.bnpparibas.com
14
OUR PUBLICATIONS
You can read and watch our analyses on Eco news, our iPad and Android application
http://economic-research.bnpparibas.com
© BNP Paribas (2015). All rights reserved.
Prepared by Economic Research – BNP PARIBAS
Registered Office: 16 boulevard des Italiens – 75009 PARIS
Tel : +33 (0) 1.42.98.12.34
Internet : www.group.bnpparibas.com - www.economic-research.bnpparibas.com
Publisher: Jean Lemierre
Editor : William De Vijlder
This document is intended solely for information purposes and is not a solicitation to invest, an offer to buy or sell securities or a contractual document. The information contained herein is based on what BNP Paribas considers to be reliable sources. Since the information is not verified systematically, the information presented in this document is provided without any guarantees and should not be considered exhaustive. Consequently, BNP Paribas and its subsidiaries cannot be held liable for this document in
any manner.
All rights to the translation, adaptation and reproduction of this document, in part or in whole, by whatever means, and in all countries, is prohibited without the consent of BNP Paribas.