children and climate change conference princeton, march 12-13 th 2015 simon dietz, ben groom and...

13
The impact of climate change on children Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Upload: arlene-chapman

Post on 13-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

The impact of climate change on children

Children and climate change conferencePrinceton, March 12-13th 2015

Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Page 2: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Net Benefits of Mitigation (2C)

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)13/03/2015 2

Page 3: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the Social Discount Rate (SDR)

“Positive”: r

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

“Normative”: d

effectwealth preference

timepuregr

13/03/2015 3

0

0 1t

tt cuW

SDR

SWF

Page 4: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Discounted Utilitarianism (DU) and the SDR with uncertainty

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Lower SDR

effect prudence

1

effectwealth preference

timepurevar5.0 txg t

13/03/2015 4

0

0 1t

tt cuEW

2

1

,~

exp

Nx

xcc

t

ttt

Declining SDR with persistence

SDR

SWF

Page 5: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Resource Scarcity and Dual DiscountingE.g. Sterner and Persson (2008)

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Dual SDRs

CHCHHHH

HCHCCCC

gg

gg

13/03/2015 5

0

10 ,1

ttt HCuW

Scarcer H, substitute C: lower SDR

SDR

SWF

Page 6: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Extensions and Alternatives to Discounted Utilitarianism

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)13/03/2015 6

1

11

11

0

t

tSDU

tSDU

t

SDU

cu

W

Wcu

W c

c

Page 7: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Prioritarian SWF Adler and Treich 2012, 2015

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Higher SDR (g>0)

Effect

anPrioritarieffectwealth 1 gg

13/03/2015 7

0

0t

tP cugW

Priority for low well-being

SDR

SWF

0

1

1t

tcu

Page 8: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism Dietz and Asheim (2012)

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Zero weight in the present if unsustainable

13/03/2015 8

n'egalitaria' if

esustainablnot if

e'sustainabl' if 1

11

11

0

t

tSDU

tSDU

t

SDU

cu

W

Wcu

W c

c

Coincides with DU for sustainable paths

SDR

SWF

With catastrophic impacts, damages x 4

Page 9: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

The ‘elephant in the room’: Population ethics(Millner 2012)

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)13/03/2015 9

Page 10: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Average and Classical Utilitarianism (Millner 2012)

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

CU better, but fails: ‘Repugnant’ conclusion: welfare higher

for large subsistence population.

13/03/2015 10

nism)utilitaria (classical

nism)utilitaria (average

uNcu

ucu

t

t

AU fails: Utility Independence Existence independence Negative expansion

principle

Utilitarian SWF

“SDR”+ axioms

Page 11: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Alternatives? Utilitarian and PrioritarianMillner 2012, Fleurbaey and Zuber 2014

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Population enters via distribution of well-being, u

Uncertain population growth13/03/2015 11

uNcu t

CLU better but: ‘very sadistic conclusion’ Doesn’t prioritise ‘lives worth living’

(u>0)

Critical LevelUtilitarianism

ugNgEW niEPEDE

11Expected

PrioritorianEqually

Distributed Equivalent

Page 12: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Conclusion

CBA is a means to an end

DU: a particular welfare framework

DU can be adapted for some intergenerational issues

Beyond “meta ethics”: population, sustainability

Theoretical and practical issues for CBA of our children’s welfare

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)13/03/2015 12

Page 13: Children and climate change conference Princeton, March 12-13 th 2015 Simon Dietz, Ben Groom and Billy Pizer

Thanks!

Dietz, Groom and Pizer (2015)

Ben GroomAssociate Professor in Environment and Development [email protected]

13/03/2015 13