child dev lesson plan2

Upload: husteadbetty

Post on 05-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Child Dev Lesson Plan2

    1/4

    TPCK Planning Tool

    Lesson Title: Sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptives

    Duration: 90 minutes

    Audience: 10-12th

    graders

    Lesson Purpose/Objective: Review STD/contraceptive information for test next class

    Question of the Day: Which contraceptive was new to you and why would you choose to use it or not

    use it? Include at least the following: side effects, cost, and ease of use. (5 mins.)

    Students will create a set of questions for a particular topic within the STD/contraceptives chapters to

    enter in the jeopardy review game on the computer. These will be chosen by either first come first serve, or

    by a draw out of the hat. The students will vote to select the method. Once the questions are completed, the

    teacher will demonstrate how to enter them in the computer and then watch and help if needed while they

    complete this task. (Other groups will put away books, and set up tables into team seats as this is done.)

    (30 mins.)

    Game will be played from student questions and then the second round will be played with the

    teacher questions. (The students may not select from the category that they created unless that is all that is

    left.) (35-45 mins.)

    Once the game is over, pass out the prize to the winning team and ask everyone to write down what

    they learned they need to work on to be ready for the test next class. Have the students that did not win say

    what they need to work on and then give them a piece of candy. Put tables back. (10 mins.)

    Supplies/Equipment Needed: Parenting Textbook, computer, projector or Smartboard,

    Teacher Supplies Computer Projector or

    Smartboard

    http://jeopardylabs.com/

    2nd

    round questions,

    created by teacher,

    ready to go

    Prizes

    Student Supplies Textbooks Notes Paper

    Other

    Resources/Materials:

    See attached: TPCK planning Tool Reference page, UDL, Marzano, Theories Breakdown, Information

    Literacy Comparison

    Standards Used:

    Comment [H1]: In the past lesson plan,

    students did not help create questions. The

    teacher made. The game was also done on

    laminated cards with the score kept on the

    board.

    Comment [H2]: Second round was not

    previously done. I thought this would be a g

    to be sure in-depth questions are asked tha

    deduction and reasoning to complete.

    Comment [H3]: I did not do a reflection

    end of the game in the past.

    http://jeopardylabs.com/http://jeopardylabs.com/http://jeopardylabs.com/
  • 7/31/2019 Child Dev Lesson Plan2

    2/4

    Content Standards

    Used

    ISTE Standards for

    Teachers and Students

    21st

    Century Skills

    (NCREL)

    Information Literacy

    Standards

    (AASL, AECT)

    Colorado uses these

    Standards

    http://www.coloradost

    ateplan.com/content_st

    andards.htm

    http://www.iste.org/sta

    ndards.aspx

    http://p21.org/ www.ala.org/aasl/stand

    ards/

    www.cde.state.co.us/ed

    tech/download/st-7.pdf

    N15.1.2 Analyzeexpectations andresponsibilities ofparenting.

    Communication and

    collaboration

    RWC01.01.c - OralExpression andListening - Effectivespeaking in formaland informal settingsrequire appropriate use

    of methods andaudience awareness.Use examples,illustrations, graphics,quotations, analogies,facts, and statistics tofocus and support thecontent of apresentation

    N15.1.3 Analyzeconsequences ofparenting practices tothe individual, family,and society.

    Research and

    Information

    RWC04.06.c - Researchand Reasoning - Collect,analyze, and evaluateinformation obtainedfrom multiple sources toanswer a question,propose solutions, orshare findings and

    conclusions - Identifyand evaluate potentialsources of information

    for accuracy, reliability,

    validity, and timeliness

    Digital Citizenship

    Differentiation Methods:

    UDL Behaviorism Cognitivism Constructivism

    1. Provide options for

    language and symbols

    2. Provide options for

    1. Teacher

    demonstrates process

    for jeopardy, then

    students repeat

    1. Students choose

    information best suited

    for jeopardy game by

    determining what they

    feel are the most

    important facts.

    1. Enter information

    into jeopardy game

    and then play game.

    http://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.iste.org/standards.aspxhttp://www.iste.org/standards.aspxhttp://www.iste.org/standards.aspxhttp://p21.org/http://p21.org/http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/http://www.cde.state.co.us/edtech/download/st-7.pdfhttp://www.cde.state.co.us/edtech/download/st-7.pdfhttp://www.cde.state.co.us/edtech/download/st-7.pdfhttp://www.cde.state.co.us/edtech/download/st-7.pdfhttp://www.cde.state.co.us/edtech/download/st-7.pdfhttp://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/http://www.ala.org/aasl/standards/http://p21.org/http://www.iste.org/standards.aspxhttp://www.iste.org/standards.aspxhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htmhttp://www.coloradostateplan.com/content_standards.htm
  • 7/31/2019 Child Dev Lesson Plan2

    3/4

    comprehension 2. Reinforce

    knowledge with

    rewardswinner

    2. Answers questions

    by using previous

    information

    2. Shows

    comprehension

    through answeringgame questions while

    standing

    Strategies Used:

    Marzanos

    Strategies

    1. Similarities

    and Differences

    2. Summarizing

    and Note Taking

    3. Reinforcing

    Effort and

    Providing

    Recognition

    4. Homework and

    Practice

    Creating questions

    for game

    Winners and good

    questions

    recognized

    Study for test

    5. Nonlinguistic

    Representations

    6. Cooperative

    Learning

    7. Setting

    Objectives and

    Providing

    Feedback

    8. Generating and

    Testing

    Hypotheses

    9. Questions,

    Cues, and

    Advance

    Organizers

    Work in groups to

    come up with their

    questions and to

    play the game

    Importance of

    learning during the

    review game is

    understoodwant

    to be successful on

    test

    Question of the

    Day to start class

    relating to the days

    lesson

    Reflection Used:

    Teacher Students

    Pre-reflectionuse previous information and

    feelings from students to determine future path

    Mid-reflectionevaluate ongoing feedback from

    students

    Post reflectionevaluate lesson and rewrite plan

    with improvements

    Use exit cards, reflection essays, discussion, Q &A,

    or other method

    Pre -

    Mid-

    Post-

  • 7/31/2019 Child Dev Lesson Plan2

    4/4

    Notes:

    Pre-teacher will begin class with a question of the

    day that will relate to this class, but will require

    reflection from the class before.

    Mid-teacher will be sure the students are

    understanding the questions/answers as the game

    progresses by observing confused students and

    explaining answers if the group that chose the

    question cannot.

    Post-teacher will award winning team and have

    each student that did not win reflect on what they

    need to work on/study for homework to be

    successful on their test.

    Notes:

    Pre-students will reflect on what is important within

    their topic as they prepare their questions for the

    game

    Mid-students will reflect and ask questions during

    the game as they do/do not understand answers

    Post-Winners will receive candy prize and losers

    will get candy after telling the class what they need

    to work on the most for improving their knowledge

    to do well on the test next class.

    Other:

    After students leave, review the questions they had the most trouble with. Was it the way they were written?

    Does it need to be re-taught? Was it an obscure question? Evaluate them and see if anything will need

    reviewed at the beginning of next class before the test.

    Comment [H4]: I did not reflect on the sanswers in the past, but I do b elieve after o

    that this would be very beneficial. I have lea

    how all the theories play into learning and r

    that more care needs taken when planning

    and in evaluating them afterwards for pros

    cons.