Cheryl GibbsBeth MacRae

July 27, 2011

Office of Postsecondary EducationInternational and Foreign Language Education

Fellow Pre and Post Language Evaluation • The importance of the language evaluation• Results of feedback from Centers• Challenges and solutions• IRIS Enhancements

FLAS Tracking Survey• Why now?• What will the survey cover?• Challenges and concerns• FLAS tracking survey – tentative plan

Carry-Over Funds

Results of the language evaluations will show:• Effectiveness of the FLAS program• Future budget justifications

First year and still a learning process….

FLAS Language Advisory Group• Ray Clifford, Meg Malone & Scott McGinnis

Most Centers currently:

• Use instructors familiar with administering OPI or

ACTFL tests and/or trained as evaluators

• Use instructors of the target language

• Administer the tests through the Center

• Hold the student responsible for identifying the

evaluator

Same vs. different instructors?Same instructor = standardization of testing

Students and language evaluators forget about the post evaluation during the academic yearFLAS Coordinators send reminder one month prior

to final report due date

The test does not fit the clientelePotential future revisions

FLAS fellows tend to be less motivated to participate in the evaluation process after completing the study programCenters can require students sign an agreement

Limited English language skills of the instructor overseasAvailable domestic backup

Not all summer programs are completed by September 1 when reports are due

IFLE will change the date to October 1

Format is challenging because it only tests oral proficiency.IFLE will consider other evaluations in the future

Can IFLE provide the instructors with a standard rubric for determining the language markers? No, it would allow potential predetermination of the

student’s ability.

Can IFLE consider the option of offering a small stipend or compensation to the evaluators?Unfortunately, this is not an option at this time.

FLAS competition import

Guides and FLAS instructor business process document

Language evaluation results

FLAS instructors now have one account

The Congress believed –• That a mechanism for determining program

IMPACT was long overdue.

• All grantees shall administer a survey to determine— Post graduate employment Education Training

• That the federal INVESTMENT has been substantial.FY 2000 – 2002: $56,669,000FY 2003 – 2005: $84,193,000FY 2006 – 2009: $117,903,000

• That thousands of fellows have been trained.FY 2000 – 2002: 4,696FY 2003 – 2005: 6,037FY 2006 – 2009: 8,210

• And that the INTEGRITY and VALUE of the program could best be validated after students had graduated from their area studies and language training programs.

The FLAS tracking survey will solicit the following:1. FLAS Recipient (Alum) Information

• Gender• Age• Race/ethnicity• Citizenship• Location (state, country)

2. Postgraduate employment, education, & training• Employment status• Sector• Year (first) degree with FLAS support is obtained• Additional degree(s) or training obtained & when

3. Foreign language and area studies training• Relevance of area studies training to job

requirements and responsibilities• Frequency for using/applying language skills and

area studies expertise• Usefulness of language and area studies training

These are examples of data elements. The goal is to construct questions that will collect data that can be compared to other national data sets to demonstrate the difference in outcomes between FLAS fellows and non FLAS fellows.

1. Updated email addresses2. Centers’ access to data3. Privacy issues4. Center specific questions5. Security concerns, Survey Monkey vs. Qualtrix6. Alternate format besides email7. ED vs. Center administered survey and effect on

response rate8. IRIS capabilities for administering the survey

1. Select FLAS Tracking Advisory Committee2. Convene FLAS Tracking Advisory Committee3. Send survey to Centers for final comment4. Submit survey for approval5. Request updated email addresses 6. Survey first cohort: AY 2010 and Summer 2011 7. Publish data on program outcomes8. Provide data to Centers

Academic Year to Summer

Summer to next Academic Year with approval from program officer• Only after attempting to use and share summer

funds• Email request must be approved by program

officer

Thank You!