cheniere energy, inc.eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/8208.pdfcheniere energy, inc. 23rd international gas and...

CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.

23rd International Gas and Power Summit, Paris . November 22, 2018

The LNG market: new opportunities and challenges

Eric Bensaude Managing Director – Commercial Operations and Asset Optimization

CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. NYSE American: LNG

LNG MARKET OUTLOOK AND U.S. LNG’S FUNCTIONAndrew Walker – Vice President, Strategy and Communication IEEJ – November 15, 2018

IEEJ：December 2018©IEEJ2018

Safe Harbor Statements

2

Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical or present facts or conditions, included or incorporated by reference herein are “forward-looking statements.” Included among “forward-looking statements” are, among other things:

• statements regarding the ability of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. to pay distributions to its unitholders or Cheniere Energy, Inc. to pay dividends to its shareholders or participate in share or unit buybacks;• statements regarding Cheniere Energy, Inc.’s or Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.’s expected receipt of cash distributions from their respective subsidiaries;• statements that Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. expects to commence or complete construction of its proposed liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) terminals, liquefaction facilities, pipeline facilities or other

projects, or any expansions or portions thereof, by certain dates or at all; • statements that Cheniere Energy, Inc. expects to commence or complete construction of its proposed LNG terminals, liquefaction facilities, pipeline facilities or other projects, or any expansions or portions

then of, by certain dates or at all;• statements regarding future levels of domestic and international natural gas production, supply or consumption or future levels of LNG imports into or exports from North America and other countries

worldwide, or purchases of natural gas, regardless of the source of such information, or the transportation or other infrastructure, or demand for and prices related to natural gas, LNG or other hydrocarbon products;

• statements regarding any financing transactions or arrangements, or ability to enter into such transactions; • statements relating to the construction of our proposed liquefaction facilities and natural gas liquefaction trains (“Trains”) and the construction of our pipelines, including statements concerning the

engagement of any engineering, procurement and construction ("EPC") contractor or other contractor and the anticipated terms and provisions of any agreement with any EPC or other contractor, and anticipated costs related thereto;

• statements regarding any agreement to be entered into or performed substantially in the future, including any revenues anticipated to be received and the anticipated timing thereof, and statements regarding the amounts of total LNG regasification, natural gas, liquefaction or storage capacities that are, or may become, subject to contracts;

• statements regarding counterparties to our commercial contracts, construction contracts and other contracts;• statements regarding our planned development and construction of additional Trains or pipelines, including the financing of such Trains or pipelines;• statements that our Trains, when completed, will have certain characteristics, including amounts of liquefaction capacities; • statements regarding our business strategy, our strengths, our business and operation plans or any other plans, forecasts, projections or objectives, including anticipated revenues, capital expenditures,

maintenance and operating costs, run-rate SG&A estimates, cash flows, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow, distributable cash flow per share and unit, deconsolidated debt outstanding, and deconsolidated contracted EBITDA, any or all of which are subject to change;

• statements regarding projections of revenues, expenses, earnings or losses, working capital or other financial items; • statements regarding legislative, governmental, regulatory, administrative or other public body actions, approvals, requirements, permits, applications, filings, investigations, proceedings or decisions; • statements regarding our anticipated LNG and natural gas marketing activities; and• any other statements that relate to non-historical or future information.

These forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “achieve,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “develop,” “estimate,” “example,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goals,” ”guidance,”“opportunities,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “propose,” “subject to,” “strategy,” “target,” and similar terms and phrases, or by use of future tense. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they do involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and these expectations may prove to be incorrect. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in“Risk Factors” in the Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 21, 2018, which are incorporated by reference into this presentation. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these ”Risk Factors.” These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation, and other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement or provide reasons why actual results may differ, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

IEEJ：December 2018 © IEEJ2018

Today’s Presentation

U.S. Gas Market Overview

U.S. LNG Update

LNG Demand Outlook

Impact of U.S. LNG

3


Cheniere Company Overview

US$16B*Market Cap

US$30BCapital Spend

LNG capacity 18 mtpa Operational

18 mtpa Under Construction

14 mtpa Under Development

1000+ Employees

6 Offices Worldwide− Houston− Washington− London− Singapore− Tokyo− Beijing

Building an industry leading U.S. LNG export platform

* Note: as of 1st Nov 2018

Sabine Pass Liquefaction ProjectLocated in LouisianaEntered service as an import terminal in 20084 Bcf/d send-out capacityConversion to bi-directional facility via theaddition of liquefaction capacityFirst export cargo early 2016

Corpus Christi LNG Terminal Located in South TexasFirst ‘greenfield’ export facility under constructionin the USAFirst LNG expected in late 2018

4


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 20350

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Forecast LNG Industry Growth to 2035

5

Qatar

Australia

Russia Mozambique

mtpa mtpa

Source: Cheniere interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data (Q2 & Q3 2018).

“A new gas order is emerging, with US LNG helping to accelerate a shift towards a more flexible, liquid, global market.”

“The transformation of LNG markets creates a huge opportunity for gas users in Asia.”

IEA World Energy Outlook 2017

Asia Pacific

Asia Pacific is forecasted to remain the top importing region, representing ~65% of total global demand in 2035

Forecast LNG Supply by Country to 2035

Forecast LNG Imports by Region to 2035

Europe & FSU

Americas Middle East Africa


6

U.S. Gas Market Overview


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Rest of US 'shale'

Permian (TX & NM)

Utica (OH, PA & WV)

Marcellus (PA, WV, OH & NY)

Haynesville (LA & TX)

Eagle Ford (TX)

Fayetteville (AR)

Barnett (TX)

Woodford (OK)

Bakken (ND & MT)

Antrim (MI, IN & OH)

US Natural Gas Production

7

US shale production has reached record levels: 56.4 Bcf/d as of July 2018

Source: EIA (2018), BP Statistical Review of Energy (2018)

Shale = 56 Bcf/d in July 2018, or 68% of total US natural gas production

US Shale Gas Production (2004 to date)

600

100

200

400

300

500

Bcfd Bcma

Russian Federation (2nd)

Iran (3rd)

Canada / Qatar (4th/5th)

Marcellus + Utica

US Shale

US shale & Marcellus/Utica cf. ranked producing countries (2017)


($12)

($10)

($8)

($6)

($4)

($2)

$0

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000

Brea

k-ev

en g

as p

rice

($/M

MBt

u)

Commercially recoverable gas resource (Tcf)

North America Natural Gas Cost of Supply Curve

8

An estimated 840 Tcf can be developed at $3 or less, compared to an assessment of 186 Tcf eight years ago

Break-even price at Henry Hub for North American natural gas resources (2018)

Source: IHS Markit July 2018; ‘The Shale Gale turns 10’ , Break-even price required to earn a 10% unlevered return

840 Tcf 1250 Tcf

Resource that can be developed at a HH of $3 or less

Resource that can be developed at a HH of $4 or less

Date of Assessment 2010 2018Tcf @ $3 or less 186 840Tcf @ $4 or less 952 1250

Source IHS Markit


EIA Price Outlook for Henry Hub and WTI

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030

$/M

MBt

u (n

omin

al) WTI IEO 2018

WTI IEO 2017

HH IEO 2018

HH IEO 2017

9

WTI

HH

EIA Forecast Historical

Outlooks for oil shifted upwards in 2018, HH downwards.

Source: US EIA IEO 2018 and 2017


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

US Gas Consumption By Sector

Source: US EIA 2018 AEO Reference Case

US Natural Gas Consumption by Sector

Bcf/d

Dom

estic

Con

sum

ptio

n Ex

ports

Residential

Commercial

Industrial

Transportation

Power

Production Net LNG exports

74 Bcf/d

118 Bcf/d Domestic consumption set to grow by 21 Bcf/d to 2050. Exports set to grow by 23 Bcf/d

49 Bcf/d

10


11

U.S. LNG Projects Overview


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18 Jan-19 Jan-20 Jan-21 Jan-22

MTP

A

Corpus Christi T3 Nov-18

Non-Cheniere Export Project

Cheniere Export Project

U.S. LNG Capacity : Operating and Under Construction

12

U.S. LNG capacity set to reach ~70 mtpa in 2020

Freeport T3

Freeport T2

Freeport T1

Cameron LNG T2

Corpus Christi T2

Cameron LNG T1

Sabine Pass T5

Elba Ph II

Cove Point LNG T1

Elba Ph I

Corpus Christi T1

Sabine Pass T1-4

Cameron LNG T3


Sabine Pass Terminal

1313


Sabine Pass Terminal

1414


Corpus Christi Liquefaction Terminal

15

October 2018


16

US LNG Projects: Permitting Status

74

395

97

14

157

53

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Total No FERC filing Pre-filed Formal filing Approved FID

mtp

a

Alaska LNG Annova LNG Calcasieu Pass LNG Corpus Christi LNG Midscale Driftwood LNG Gulf LNG Energy Jordan Cove* Plaquemines LNG Port Arthur LNG Rio Grande LNG Texas LNG Freeport Train 4

Lake Charles SP T6 Cameron T4/5 Magnolia Golden Pass SP T1-5

Cameron T1-3 Freeport T1-3 Cove Point CC T1-3 Elba

Commonwealth LNG Fourchon LNG

Sources: US FERC, US DOE, and press reports Excludes Delfin LNG, which is outside FERC’s jurisdiction

FERC Status (as of September 2018)

*Previously denied by FERC and had to re-file

~ 23 mtpa online

~ 51 mtpa under construction

Over 300 mtpa proposed

16


17

LNG Demand Outlook


18

Qatar

Australia

USA

0

100

200

300

400

500

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

LNG Trade Forecast

Supply / Demand Forecast Supports Project Growth

0

20

40

60

80

100

Malaysia U.S. Qatar Australia

Production Capacity

2015 2020

mtpa mtpa

Supply: E

xisting and Under C

onstruction

2015 to 2030 CAGR: 4.8%

New Supply

Source: Cheniere Research estimates; Wood Mackenzie for historical figures


0

200

400

600

800

Asi

a P

acifi

c

Mid

dle

Eas

t

N.A

mer

ica

Afri

ca

C&

S A

mer

ica

Eur

asia

Eur

ope

Bcm

a

-5000

5001000150020002500

Asi

a P

acifi

c

Afri

ca

Mid

dle

Eas

t

C&

S A

mer

ica

Eur

asia

N.A

mer

ica

Eur

ope

MTO

EAsian Market Context

A high growth region …

19

Primary energy consumption growth (2015-2040)

Gas consumption growth (2015-2040)

Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2017 – New Policies Scenario

Asia Pacific = 62% of total

Asia Pacific = 44% of total

OpportunitiesDemand for gas in Asia Pacific region expected todouble by 2040

Forecast to become the largest gas consumingregion by 2030

New markets, new buyers and new demandsegments for LNG are emerging

A more liquid and more responsive global LNGtrade will make gas more attractive

But gas demand growth in Asia should not be takenfor granted …..

ChallengesDemand uncertainty a common theme across Asiaas the energy transition and market liberalisationsgather pace

Regional import dependency forecast to increasefrom 23% in 2015 to 39% in 2040

Although barriers to entry for LNG are reducingsome new markets will require help with thecommercial or technical aspects of LNG

Coal likely to remain cheap – and tempting

Gas needs to remain affordable, reliable and secure


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Bunkers - Atlantic

Africa

Europe

North America

Central & South America

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Bunkers - Asia/Middle East

Middle East

Other Asia

China

India

JKT

Forecast LNG Imports by Region

Source: Cheniere interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data (Q3 2018)

C. & S. America

mtpa Asia and Middle East Atlantic Basin mtpa

EuropeJKT

China

India

Other Asia

20


Indonesia

Thailand

Malaysia

Singapore

VietnamPhilippines

ChinaIndia

Pakistan

Bangladesh

Sri Lanka

Taiwan

South Korea

Australia

Japan

(40)

(20)

-

20

40

60

80

mtp

a

5 drivers of Asia Pacific demand growth

Declining indigenous/piped supply

Increased private sector activity

New LNG consuming segments (eg.bunkering & trucking)

Pro-gas energy policies

LNG demand growth: 2017 to 2035

Supplement to renewable generation

Focus on Asia Pacific Markets

21

China continues to dominate the headlines But South East Asia important as a region – in terms of growth and new importers


?


22

Impact of U.S. LNG


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

mtp

a

Commercial Evolution of LNG

23

* Contract duration of 4 years or less (GIIGNL) Source: CEDIGAZ World Outlook for 1965 – 1985 (assumes no spot volume), Poten and Partners (2001) 1985 to 2000, GIIGNL (2018) 2000 to 2018

LNG trade by contract length

Spot & short-term

trade*

Mid & long-term contract

trade

27%

73%

Bilateral deals Slow evolution Growing flexibility

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Spot & short-term trade % of total


U.S. LNG Exports Driving Change in the Industry

Price diversity and greater pricetransparencyDestination flexibility at buyer’s directionGrowing liquidityFOB and DES hub formationSustainable low-cost supply overthe long-run

A more responsive, more competitive, more diverse, and more resilient LNG trade system

24


Sabine Pass Cargo Destinations

Cheniere Office

Cheniere LNG Facility

Portugal,

Kuwait, UAE,

Pakistan India, Thailand

Brazil

Argentina

Houston, TX

Washington, DC

London, U.K.

Singapore

Cargo Delivery Destination

China, Taiwan

Spain

Mexico

Dominican Republic, Panama

Italy, Malta, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Israel

Japan, South Korea

More Than 475 Cargoes (>1,700 TBtu) Exported from Sabine Pass Since Startup Delivered to 29 Countries and Regions Across the Globe

Chile

Tokyo, Japan

France, Lithuania, Poland, Netherlands,

United Kingdom Beijing, China

Colombia

01020304050607080

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018

cargo countmillion tonnes

Asia Latin America ASIA MENA

Sabine Pass Exports by Destination Region

Sources: Cheniere Research, Kpler Note: Cumulative cargoes and volumes as of October 31, 2018. MENA – Middle East & North Africa

25


The LNG Trade is Evolving

JKM Swaps

2 4 3

9

17

28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

mtp

a

2015 2016 2017 2018

Trading House Activity LNG volumes accounted for by the four

commodity trading houses with the largest LNG volumes

10% of total trade in 2017

Equivalent to 9.9% of total trade YTD 2018

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2000 2005 2010 2015

mtp

a

Spot and Short-term*

Short-term

Spot

Spot and Short-term Quantities Spot volumes

(~60 mt) = 21% of total trade in 2017

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Carg

oes

BuySell

Tendered Cargoes

Source: Cheniere interpretation of ICIS Heren GLM publication (2013, 2014, 2015) and Wood Mackenzie LNG Tender Tracker (2016 , 2017) Source: Cheniere interpretation of Platts news reports (2018)

Source: Cheniere interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data (2018) Source: GIIGNL Annual Reports.

Shown by year of cargo delivery – includes multi-

year tenders & tenders not awarded / unknown if

awarded

Equivalent to ~17% of

total trade in 2017*

*assuming 1 cargo = 0.07 mt

*Spot = delivered within 90 days, Short-term = 90 days to 4 years

632015 2016 2017 2018 YTD

Volume (mt) 0.5 2.4 9.8 23.2Cargoes 9 42 169 403% of trade 0.2% 0.9% 3.4% 9.9%Cargoes pd eqv. 0.03 0.11 0.46 1.48

26


27 Note: 2018 YTD = As of Oct. 15, 2018Source: Cheniere interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data (Q3 2018)

Perception that market was well supplied, wider supply choice, plus growing demand uncertainty resulted in increasing buyer focus on shorter-term / smaller volume contracts in recent years.

To what extent is this cyclical versus structural?

01020304050

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018YTD

ACQ of Contracts by Duration

< 5 years 5-10 years 11-19 years ≥ 20 years

mtpa

01020304050

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018YTD

ACQ of Contracts by Volume

<1 mtpa 1 to <2 mtpa 2 to <3 mtpa3 to <4 mtpa 4 to <5 mtpa 5 mtpa and larger

mtpa

01020304050

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018YTD

ACQ of Contracts by Pricing Indexation

Oil European hub Henry Hub/AECO Hybrid

mtpa

01020304050

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018YTD

ACQ of Contracts by Source

Portfolio supply Project specific

mtpa


Contracting Behavior Reacting to Changing Market Environment

Sabine Pass Liquefaction Project (Louisiana) Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project (Texas)

Cheniere’s LNG Supply Projects

Our long-term customers

28

Building an industry leading LNG export platform along the U.S. Gulf Coast


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Qatar Australia U.S. Other

Slowdown in LNG Supply Project FIDs Since 2015

FIDs Per Annum (Total Volume)


mtpa U.S. Hiatus Qatar Hiatus Australia

29


Tortue FLNG

Competing Supply

Non-Cheniere liquefaction project (source Wood Mackenzie LNG FID Tracker Q3 2018 (1)) FID reached in October 2018

Cheniere liquefaction project

Corpus Christi Expansion

Sabine Pass Expansion

Arctic LNG 2

Mozambique LNG (Area 1) Rovuma LNG (Area 4)

Qatar Expansion

PNG LNG Expansion

Other U.S. Gulf Coast projects

Woodfibre LNG Sakhalin-2Expansion

Pluto Expansion

Notes: (1) FID Imminent or Building Momentum, Company FID Target 2020 or earlier, or Wood Mackenzie expect FID 2020 or earlier if no company date given

Multiple LNG Export Projects Competing for 2022+ Market Demand

Fortuna FLNG

LNG Canada

30


U.S. LNG: Changing the Industry

U.S. LNG has already changedthe industry

Price diversification and greater pricetransparency

Destination flexibility at buyer’sdirection

Increased supply availability andgreater market competition

A sustainably low-cost supply over thelong-run

And is set to drive further change

Growing liquidity / hub formation /price discovery

Resulting in a more competitive andmore resilient trade system

31

15

72

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Forecasted U.S. LNG Output to 2022mtpa


U.S. will be the third largest exporter by 2020


32


cheniere energy, inc.eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/8208.pdfcheniere energy, inc. 23rd international gas and...

Documents