1

EVALUATION SHEET PURPOSE:

The purpose of this evaluation is to improve the teaching effectiveness of the instructor and the learning experience of the student. Please note that this form and its contents are anonymous and strictly confidential.

PART ONE:

Respond to each of the statements below by checking the box that most accurately represents the degree to which you agree with each statement about the module or instructor. The scale ranges from 5 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree). Please feel free to clarify your responses for this section in what you write for Part Two.

INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS

5 Strongly Agree

4

3 Agree

2

1 Strongly Disagree

Not Applicable

The teacher...

1. supported independent thought and expression throughout the lesson

2. urged students to work cooperatively

3. urged students to use critical thinking and problem-solving skills

4. used ICT to present the project

5. was clear in explaining requirements, assignments and expectations:

6. explained project content clearly and understandably:

Into the LAB

5 Strongly Agree

4

3 Agree

2

1 Strongly Disagree

Not Applicable

1. The lab session was useful in understanding project material:

2. Adequate time was given in order to complete assignments:

3. The guidelines in the lab were clear and precise

4. Materials and lab equipment was sufficient

5. The textbook and/or other project materials were useful learning tools:

OVERALL LEARNING OUTCOME

5 Strongly Agree

4

3 Agree

2

1 Strongly Disagree

Not Applicable

Even I am not so interested in Chemistry lessons, I found this experience quite interesting and

2

stimulating.

I realized that working in the project, I was able to work for the group using the guidelines

Finally, I would rather attend lessons in a more stimulating way than the traditional one.

PART TWO: Briefly respond to the following question below and add any comments you probably have: What parts of this class were most helpful?

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: