che 312 portfolio feedback and marking sheet

7/30/2019 ChE 312 Portfolio Feedback and Marking Sheet

1/4

ChE 312 Process Synthesis & Design

Feedback and Marking Sheet for Portfolio

Student name: _____________________________Total mark: ______(max. 100)

Task 1. Information on designated product (20 marks)

Criterion Scoring

Information

content

Mark: ______

Little thought given to

the material; largely

irrelevant information

included

Most topic areas covered

adequately, but some

gaps; selected article (part

c) is more than 2 years old

or is not commercial

All topic areas covered

with appropriate balance;

recent article is

commercially relevant

and well summarised

0 5 10

Choice of

information

sources

Mark: ______

None specified, or main

sources were non-

professional (such as

Wikipedia or student

projects on the Internet)

One or two professional

information sources used

or some lesser quality

sources included

Three or more

professional sources used

(e.g. Ullmanns, ICIS

Chemical Business, news

wires, manufacturers

websites, ...)

0 2 4

Key economic

data

Mark: ______

None specified, or main

sources were non-

professional

Some topic areas given

were covered; used lesser

quality sources; some

evidence of literature

consultation

Covered all topic areas

stated with good breadth

and depth; used

professional and valid

data sources

0 3 6

Subtotal: _______

Additional comments:


2/4

Task 2. Process flow diagram (40 marks)

Criterion Scoring

Justification of

process selection

Mark: ______

None specified, or brief

description given

without much thought

on selection rationale

Procedure employed in

process selection

described; one or two

selection criteria included

Procedure employed in

process selection

described; three or more

selection criteria given

0 2 5

Process flow

diagram (PFD)

Mark: ______

None given, or block

flow diagram or other

type of diagram other

than the PFD provided

Simple PFD provided

with one or more key

components (e.g. piping,

equipment, valves, etc.)missing

Engineering PFD

complete with streams,

major equipment, major

control valves, majorbypass & recirculation

streams, operational data,

stream names

0 6 12Process key

technical and

performance data

Mark: ______

None specified, or other


provided

Few process key

technical and

performance data

provided, or used lesser

quality sources

Sufficient data on reactor

separation and other

discussed (e.g.

effectiveness, efficiency,

quality, productivity,

safety, equipment &catalyst details, and etc.),

with reference to valid

professional data sources

0 6 12

Process details

Mark: ______

None given, or other


presented

One or more required

process data missing, or

with wrong basis of

finished product, or used

lesser quality sources

All required data given

(i.e. raw materials,

catalyst if any, utility),

used valid data sources,

and on correct basis

0 3 6

Additional

information

Mark: ______

No or inadequate

additional informationprovided regarding the

process

Adequate additional

information addressingsome of the topic areas,

but some insight lacking,

some evidence ofliterature consultation

Professional additional

information presented,good breadth and depth,

valid literature used for

reference

0 2 5

Subtotal: _______



3/4

Task 3. Mass and energy balances including HYSYS simulation (30 marks)

Criterion Scoring

HYSYS

simulation

Mark: ______

No simulation

performed, or lack of

evidence that simulation

was performed

Simulation performed on

HYSYS, but with errors;

new flowsheet with mass

balance numbering

scheme & calculation

basis provided; final

mass balance table

presented

Essentially correct

HYSYS simulation; new

flowsheet with

numbering scheme used

for mass balance

presented; basis of

calculation provided;

final mass balance table

presented

0 7 12

Subtotal: _______



4/4

Task 4. Report (10 marks)

Criterion Scoring

Report

introduction

Mark: ______

Introduction presented but with unclear

report structure

Introduction presented along with clear

description of the structure of the report

1 2

Report

conclusions

Mark: ______

Not given Conclusions given but

not clearly linked to the

study

Conclusions drawn are

supported by study

conducted; page limit

respected

0 1 2

Report writing

quality

Mark:______

Many errors in spelling,

grammar and formatting;

structure is difficult to

follow; graphics are

unclear; referencesmissing or missing

essential information

A few spelling,

grammatical and

formatting mistakes;

report structure is

logical; graphicsacceptable, but may be

poorly scaled or similar;

referencing attempted

but with style errors

Essentially free from

spelling, grammatical

and formatting mistakes;

structure is logical and

clear; graphics ofprofessional standard;

well referenced and in

Chicago style

1 2 6

Subtotal: _______


che 312 portfolio feedback and marking sheet

Documents