charm results from cleoiii, cleo-c

19
Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c Steven Dytman Univ. of Pittsburgh OUTLINE: 1. Introduction to CLEO 2. D 3-body decays 3. Semileptonic D decay K - - e + K + (3770)D 0 D 0 D 0 K + - , D 0 K - e + irst results from 60pb -1 LEO-c data set taken all 2003/winter 2004! data

Upload: daire

Post on 02-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

. K -. K +.  -. e +. Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c. data. Steven Dytman Univ. of Pittsburgh. OUTLINE: Introduction to CLEO D 3-body decays Semileptonic D decay. First results from 60pb -1 CLEO-c data set taken fall 2003/winter 2004!. (3770) D 0 D 0 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Steven DytmanUniv. of Pittsburgh

OUTLINE: 1. Introduction to CLEO2. D 3-body decays3. Semileptonic D decay

K-

-

e+

K+

(3770)D0 D0

D0K+ -, D0K -e+

First results from 60pb-1 CLEO-c data set takenfall 2003/winter 2004!

data

Page 2: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

What is CLEO?

•e+e- symmetric collider at cm energy 7-10.6, 3-4.6 GeV•Standard HEP detector•CLEO III had Si vertex detector•CLEO-c has drift chamber•CESR-c has 12 wigglers added for low energy beams.

~4m

e+

e-

Collaboration=Carleton, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, Florida, George Mason, Illinois, Kansas, Northwestern, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Puerto Rico, Purdue, Rochester, RPI, SMU, Syracuse, Vanderbilt and Wayne State.

CLEO III

Page 3: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

New drift chamber (ZD) for vertexing

Page 4: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Techniques

CLEO IIIdata:

•B factories, pp colliders•Tag with D*+→D0 + , D*-→D0-.•Background suppression excellent→poor

•Charm factory, (3770) → D0D0 (~rest)•Tag with common decay, e.g. D0→K-+

•threshold cleaner, smaller cross section•Exploit quantum correlations

CLEO-cdata:

Page 5: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Charm Dalitz Plot Analyses

•New & improved hadronic BF•Study light meson properties•Search for DD mixing, CP violation

x=m/y=2Rmix=√x2+y2CLEO II: D→Ks+-

Page 6: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO II.V: D →Ks0

•First observation of this mode!•Small sample (155 events), but very clean.•With more statistics, will have impact on , puzzle•Accepted for PRL

a0(980)

K0*

0 0 0B(D K ηπ ) = 1.05 ± 0.16 ± 0.14 ± 0.10%

a0(980)

Page 7: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

How do B and D factories compare?e.g. D0→K-+0 (BF=13.0%)

CLEO II pub., PRD 63 (2001)•7070 events/4.7 fb-1

•1 ab-1 1.5M

CLEO-c, first analysis•14590 events/50 pb-1

•3 fb-11.15M

+

K*0

K*-

datadata

Page 8: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO-c status, goals

•~3fb-1 (each) at (3770)→DD, e+e- →DsDs

•Analyses underway or plannedD → Ks+-, Ks00, D+→K-++ D → K-+0, K-+0, K-+K+-D(D)→ K-e+(K+e-)

•GoalsSettle existence of (proposed L=0 K resonance)strong phase, cos< 0.05 √ 2Rmix=√x2+y2<2% (95% c.l.) |y|<0.6% (95% c.l.)

CLEO-cgoal

Page 9: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Big goal is to constrain CKM matrixvarious labs, theory all have a role

Vub/Vub 15%lB

l

D

Vcd/Vcd 7%lD

Vcs/Vcs =11%

l

B D

Vcb/Vcb 5%

Bd Bd

Vtd/Vtd =36%

Bs Bs

Vts/Vts 39% Vtb/Vtb 29%

Vus/Vus =1%

l Vud/Vud 0.1%

e

pn

t

b

W

CLEO-cCLEO-c + Lattice QCD +B factories

CLEO-c + Lattice QCD +B factories + ppbar

( )d c W cX

Page 10: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Lattice QCD

theory

phenom

Phenom is interesting, incompleteLattice QCD (Okamoto, 2004)Interesting interplay of weak and strong interaction!

22 3 2 2F

cd2 3

G|V | p |f (q )|

q 24

d

d

D0 l

D0 l

q2 (GeV2)

For

m f

acto

r

Page 11: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

PDG on D semileptonic decays

•D → K-e+ 3.58 0.18%•D → K-+ 3.19 0.17%•D → -e+ 0.36 0.06% Cabibbo suppr.•D → K*-e+ 2.15 0.35% vector•D → -e+ ???? vector•Data on Form factors sketchy

CLEO3 has new results (final) for D → -e+CLEOc has preliminary results for all channels!

Page 12: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO III D → (K,)e

M=M(shl)-M(hl)

•Best BF ratio meas., first form factor result for D→e•Results subm. to PRL

. (2004) 0.101 0.017vs RPP

0

0

Β(D πeν)= 0.082 ± 0.006 ± 0.005

Β(D Keν)

K

K

D→K-e+

D→-e+

D→-e+D→K-e+

Page 13: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO-c tagging

Modes: K-+, K- +0, K-+00, K-++-,Ks+-, Ks+-0, Ks0, -+0, K-+

BF=44.9%(BF*tag)=2*12.8% =25.6%

Total= 59432±364 tagged events

Beam energyconstrainedmass

Page 14: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO-c has better event definition e.g., D → e

CLEO III: 6.7 fb-1 at (4S)tag slow

Excellent /K with RICH

CLEO-c: 60 pb-1 at (3770)tag 9 hadronic decay modes

M(GeV) Emiss-pmiss(GeV)

D→e

109±11 events

K mistag

D0→e

Page 15: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

CLEO-c D → e, K*e

D→e: 1405±39 events D→K*e: N=88.0 ±9.7

Page 16: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Something new!D→ semileptonic decay

N(D0→-e+)=30.1±5.8

Page 17: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

BF with CLEO-c now (60 pb-1)

mode CLEO-c PDG

B(D→e+) 3.52±0.10±0.25% 3.58±0.18%

B(D→e+) 0.25±0.03±0.02% 0.36±0.06%

B(D→e+) 2.07±0.23±0.18% 2.15±0.35%

B(D→e+) 0.19±0.04±0.02% -

0.070±0.007±0.003 0.101±0.0170

0

( )

( )

D e

D Ke

Β

Β

CLEO III: 0.082 ±0.006 ±0.005

Page 18: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Decay modes

Err

or (%

)

CLEO-c projected (3fb-1)

D →

e

+

D →

e+

D

e+

D →

e

+

D+→

e

+

D+ →

e+

D+ →

e

+

D+ →

e

+

Ds →

e

+

Ds →

e

+

Ds →

e+

•BF improvement dramatic•FF, Vcd, Vcs separated with lattice FF(0).•q2 resolution~0.03 GeV2

• Vcd/Vcd1.7%

q2 dist.now

BF

/BF

CLEO-cgoal

PDG

Page 19: Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c

Summary, Outlook

• New CLEO II.V, III results– Observe D→Ks0 decay BF for first time ( is unusual)

– D→l and D→l form factor meas. (first time for )

• CLEO-c results are coming quickly!!– D→e,Ke, K*e BF measured, accuracy ≈ PDG

– D→eBF measured for first time

– High quality form factor, Vcd, Vcs meas. to come

• CLEO-c and B factories are complementary– Statistics will be similar with 3 fb-1 and 1 ab-1, resp.

– CLEO-c has advantage where bkgd suppression important