characterizing meat tenderness of finishing steers …

85
CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS FED FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF GAIN BY HUNTER O’NEAL GALLOWAY DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Emeritus Floyd McKeith, Co-Chair Assistant Professor Dustin Boler, Co-Chair Professor Emeritus Tom Carr Assistant Professor Tara Felix Assistant Professor Anna Dilger Nathan Pyatt, Ph.D., Elanco Animal Health

Upload: others

Post on 16-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS FED FOR

DIFFERENT RATES OF GAIN

BY

HUNTER O’NEAL GALLOWAY

DISSERTATION

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Sciences

in the Graduate College of the

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016

Urbana, Illinois

Doctoral Committee:

Professor Emeritus Floyd McKeith, Co-Chair

Assistant Professor Dustin Boler, Co-Chair

Professor Emeritus Tom Carr

Assistant Professor Tara Felix

Assistant Professor Anna Dilger

Nathan Pyatt, Ph.D., Elanco Animal Health

Page 2: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

ii

Abstract

Objectives were to characterize effects of average daily gain (ADG) on Warner-Bratzler

shear force (WBSF) and characterize effects of ADG on postmortem proteolysis in steers.

Thirty-six steers (initial body weight 271 ± 24 kg) were stratified by weight into 6 pens of 6

steers each. Steers were limit fed the same diet to obtain 3 different rates of gain (1.0, 1.5, and

1.85 kg/d). Steers were individually weighed every 2 weeks during the study period. Feed

allocation was adjusted using the mean body weight of the pen, based on the NRC equation for

net energy for gain. Steers were slaughtered in 3 independent slaughter groups after 151, 161, or

167 days on feed. During each slaughter event, the 2 heaviest animals from each pen were

slaughtered. Four steers were removed from the study for having retained testicles. Temperature

decline data were collected during carcass chilling starting 2 hrs postmortem. In addition,

ultimate pH (UPH) of the longissimus muscle was collected. Individual grade and yield data

were collected. Western blot samples and WBSF steaks were collected 24 hrs postmortem from

the strip loin and randomly assigned to an aging time point (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 35 d). Western

blot samples and shear force steaks were vacuum packaged and stored at 4 °C until assigned

aging point, at which time western blot samples along with the corresponding shear steaks were

frozen. Samples were also obtained from the strip loin for collagen quantification and sarcomere

length determination. Sarcomere length was determined using laser diffraction. Soluble and

insoluble collagen content was quantified using acid hydrolysis. Cook loss, percentage of weight

loss during cooking, was calculated for each WBSF steak. Steer served as the experimental unit

for each variable measured. All 32 steers were ranked by ADG and fifteen steers were selected

for western blot analysis (5 steers with the greatest growth rate, 5 steers closest to the mean

growth rate, and 5 steers with the slowest growth rate) were analyzed for desmin and troponin T

degradation at 1 and 21 d postmortem aging time. As ADG increased by 1.0 kg/d, WBSF

Page 3: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

iii

decreased by 1.42 kg in steaks aged for 1 d postmortem (1 d WBSF = 6.38 – (1.42*ADG, kg/d)

Adj. R2 = 0.36). However, ADG did not account for any of the variation in WBSF at other

postmortem aging points. A prediction model using a 4 variable equation accounted for 72% of

the variation in 1 d WBSF (1 d WBSF = -25.28 + (4.30 * UPH) – (0.29 * extractable lipid, %) +

(0.03 * skeletal maturity) + (0.20 * 1 d cook loss, %). Whereas, a 2 variable prediction equation

only accounted for 47% of the variation in WBSF at 21 d postmortem (21 d WBSF = 0.39 +

(0.10 * 21 d cook loss, %) + (0.09 * extractable lipid, %); Adj. R2 = 0.47). Degradation of the 37

kDa troponin T explained 27% of the variation observed in WBSF; however, degradation was

not significant at 1 d postmortem. In conclusion, ADG accounted for 36% of the variation in

WBSF at 1 d postmortem, but was not significant at other postmortem aging points. Multiple

linear regression models were able to account for the variation in WBSF at 1 and 21 d

postmortem.

Page 4: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

iv

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my co-advisors, Dr. Floyd McKeith and Dr. Dustin Boler, for

guiding me through multiple research trials and challenging me every step of the way. Thank

you for allowing me the opportunity to work in many different areas of the meat industry. I

would also like to thank Dr. Tara Felix for her nutritional and cattle management guidance

throughout my studies. I owe a huge thanks to Dr. Anna Dilger for challenging me in non-

applied areas of Meat Science. I would also like to thank Dr. Nathan Pyatt for providing

industry experience in the design of the study, and also thank Dr. Tom Carr and his family for

traveling to help me in my research.

In addition, I would like to thank all of my colleagues: Emily Arkfeld, Arica Bear, Kelsey

Bess, Ben Bohrer, Dr. Daniel Clark, Dianna Clark, Katelyn Jones-Hamlow, Ryan Herrick,

Jenifer Jones, Brianna Keever, Kellie Kroscher, Kelsey Little, Dr. Bradley Lowe, Martin

Overholt, Ben Peterson, and Dr. Marcos Tavárez, for all of their contributions along the way. I

would also like to thank Chuck Stites for his assistance throughout many research trails, and also

Gail Ellis for her assistance with sensory and laboratory analysis.

I would like to thank my wife, Leanne Galloway, for pushing me to achieve my dreams

and providing support through all of the stressful times. I would also like to thank my parents,

Jimmy and Renee Gaylord for supporting me in my career decisions. Most importantly, I would

like to thank God for giving me the strength to continue on during tough times.

Finally, I would like to thank Elanco Animal Health for making this project possible. It

has been an honor to be able to work with many great researchers from Elanco Animal Health

Page 5: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

v

Table of Contents

Chapter 1................................................................................................................... 1

Review of Literature ................................................................................................ 1

Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1

Cattle Management ................................................................................................................... 2

Breed and Genetics .................................................................................................................. 2

Cattle Feeding Programs ......................................................................................................... 3

Energy Source.......................................................................................................................... 5

Time on Feed ........................................................................................................................... 6

Average Daily Gain ................................................................................................................. 6

Meat Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 7

Muscle Proteins ....................................................................................................................... 7

Sarcomere Length .................................................................................................................... 9

Protein Turnover .................................................................................................................... 11

Protein Degradation ............................................................................................................... 12

Rate of pH Decline ................................................................................................................ 15

Muscle Fiber Type ................................................................................................................. 16

Muscle Fiber Diameter .......................................................................................................... 17

Connective Tissue.................................................................................................................. 18

Immunoblotting ....................................................................................................................... 20

Protein Extraction and Solubilization .................................................................................... 20

Protein Separation.................................................................................................................. 21

Western Blotting .................................................................................................................... 22

Statistical Analysis................................................................................................................... 23

Statistical Power Analysis ..................................................................................................... 23

Regression Analysis .............................................................................................................. 24

Multicollinearity .................................................................................................................... 27

Model Selection ..................................................................................................................... 28

Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 29

Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................... 30

Chapter 2.................................................................................................................38

Characterizing the effect of average daily gain and carcass parameters on

shear force in finishing steers ................................................................................38

Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 38

Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 39

Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 40

Experimental Design ............................................................................................................. 41

Diets ....................................................................................................................................... 41

Chill Rate and Ultimate pH ................................................................................................... 42

Page 6: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

vi

Carcass Grading ..................................................................................................................... 42

Sample Collection.................................................................................................................. 43

Moisture and Lipid Determination ........................................................................................ 43

Warner-Bratzler Shear Force ................................................................................................. 43

Western Blotting .................................................................................................................... 44

Sample Selection ............................................................................................................................................ 44 Whole Muscle Sample Preparation ................................................................................................................ 44 Gel Electrophoresis ........................................................................................................................................ 45 Blotting ........................................................................................................................................................... 45

Sarcomere Length Determination .......................................................................................... 46

Collagen Content ................................................................................................................... 46

Statistical Analysis ................................................................................................................ 47

Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 48

Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics ................................................................. 48

Laboratory Analysis .............................................................................................................. 49

Variable Selection and Analysis of Influential Points ........................................................... 49

Pearson Correlation Coefficients and Shear Force Prediction Equations ............................. 50

Prediction Models .................................................................................................................. 52

Proteolysis ............................................................................................................................. 53

One-way ANOVA analysis ................................................................................................... 54

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 56

Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................... 57

Page 7: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

1

Chapter 1

Review of Literature

Introduction Consumers evaluate beef palatability based primarily on their perception of tenderness,

juiciness, and flavor (Voges et al., 2007). Researchers have reported the ability to classify

carcasses based on tenderness would allow producers to manage variation in products to increase

consumer satisfaction (Wheeler et al., 1999). Others reported that consumers are willing to pay

premiums of $1.10/kg for tender beef (Boleman et al., 1997). Nolan Ryan’s Guaranteed Tender

beef uses QualitySpec to measure infrared color and postmortem aging to evaluate each carcass

for tenderness (USDA-AMS, 2011). Even the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

is developing programs to assign USDA tenderness grades to beef. Current proposed absolute

Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) thresholds for USDA-Certified Tender beef are between

3.9 and 4.4 kg; whereas, USDA-Certified Very Tender beef is required to have a WBSF less than

3.9 kg (USDA-AMS, 2012). Researchers reported postmortem proteolysis, marbling or

intramuscular fat content, connective tissue, and sarcomere length are four major factors that

influence meat tenderness (Belew et al., 2003). Many industry professionals are researching the

processes involved in postmortem tenderization because of decreases in tenderness associated

new growth technologies (Ouali, 1990; Claus et al., 2010). Researchers attribute the changes in

postmortem tenderization caused by new growth technologies to changes in calpastatin activity

(Parr et al., 1992). In implanted cattle, calpastatin activity and WBSF at postmortem aging times

less than 7 days are correlated (r ≥ 0.40; O'Connor et al., 1997). Researchers have reported poor

correlations (r = -0.10) between WBSF and total collagen content (Seideman et al., 1987).

However, neither sarcomere length, proteolysis, marbling, nor connective tissue have been able

to fully explain the variations in tenderness across a population of cattle (Light et al., 1985;

Page 8: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

2

Bailey, 1985; Seideman et al., 1987; Smulders et al., 1990; Wulf et al., 1996; O’Connor et al.,

1997; Riley et al., 2003). Many feedlot studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of

dietary treatments (high concentrate compared with forage based) and length of feeding on beef

tenderness (Epley et al., 1968; Tatum et al., 1980; Van Koevering et al., 1995; Mandell et al.,

1998). Other studies have been conducted to examine sarcomere length, muscle fiber area and

muscle fiber type to aid in the explanation of the variation of tenderness (Tuma et al., 1962;

Whipple et al., 1990; Crouse et al., 1991; Shackelford et al., 1994b; Grayson and Lawrence,

2013). However, the effects of average daily gain (ADG) on postmortem proteolysis affecting

WBSF of the longissimus muscle in cattle limit fed identical diets to achieve differences in ADG

have not been well studied. The objectives of this study were to characterize the effects of ADG

on WBSF and postmortem proteolysis and to develop prediction equations using measured

carcass traits to identify carcasses with a greater probability of meeting consumer expectations

for tenderness.

Cattle Management

Breed and Genetics

Two major subspecies of cattle, Bos indicus and Bos taurus, have been developed over

time to meet the demands of different climates. Bos indicus cattle evolved to live in tropical

climates; whereas, Bos taurus cattle evolved to live in more temperate climates. Globally, more

cattle exist in tropical or sub-tropical climates where greater humidity levels and temperatures

are more favorable for Bos indicus cattle (Baruselli et al., 2004). However, Bos indicus cattle

have greater challenges with tenderness as indicated by greater shear force values and are

tougher in sensory panel evaluations (Ramsey et al., 1963; Luckett et al., 1975; Koch et al.,

1982; Ferguson et al., 2000). The difference in toughness between these breeds is due to an

Page 9: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

3

increase in calpastatin activity, calcium dependent protease inhibitor, limiting postmortem

proteolysis (Wheeler et al., 1994; Ferguson et al., 2000) in Bos indicus cattle as compared with

Bos taurus. In addition, crossbreeds of Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle have been developed to

fit geographical or production needs. Crossbreeding of Bos indicus and Bos taurus results in

heterosis; therefore, crossbred cattle have faster rates of ADG and are less susceptible to heat

stress than Bos taurus (Frisch, 1987). In early research, Knapp and Nordskog (1946) reported

that ADG was highly heritable (heritability = 46%). In support, MacNeil et al. (1991) also

reported ADG was highly heritable. However, crossbreeding to increase ADG by introducing

Bos indicus genetics into a Bos taurus herd has resulted in less tender beef herds. Shackelford et

al. (1994a) reported 24 h postmortem calpastatin activity was highly heritable (ĥ2 = 0.65) in

cattle. Other studies have also reported calpastatin activity to be highly heritable (O'Connor et

al., 1997; Smith et al., 2007). Pringle et al. (1997) reported calpastatin activity increased linearly

(P < 0.01) as the percentage of Brahman (Bos indicus) inheritance increased in Angus x

Brahman crosses. In a comparison of British with Continental cattle, purebred Angus (British)

cattle have lower calpastatin activity as compared with purebred Charolais (Continental) cattle

(Shackelford et al., 1994a). In crossbred cattle, Riley et al. (2003) reported sire was the source of

variation in µ-calpain and calpastatin activity.

Cattle Feeding Programs

Cattle management strategies have been adapted to take advantage of the specific

resources in a given area; therefore, cattle management strategies are used to increase production

efficiency or reduce input costs. In North America, 80% of cattle are fed concentrate-based diets

during the finishing phase (Mathews and Johnson, 2013). Globally, 12% of beef is grown in an

intensive feeding system with the remaining 88% of cattle being grown using grazing systems

(FAO, 1996). When cattle are fed concentrate diets (diets with dry matter digestibility greater

Page 10: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

4

than 69%) their intake is regulated by chemostatic means instead of physical capacity, as is the

case with cattle fed forage/roughage-based diets (diets with dry matter digestibility less than

69%; Cheeke, 2005). Chemostatic regulation of feed intake uses receptors to measure the levels

of metabolites in the blood. Researchers reported blood plasma acetate concentration is

correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.01) with total dry matter intake (Quigley et al., 1991). After weaning,

cattle are placed into different finishing programs: such as calf-fed (cattle are fed a high

concentrate diet, diets using concentrates as the primary source of energy, after weaning until

slaughter), yearling-fed (cattle are backgrounded on a roughage-based diet for a period of time

before being fed a high concentrate diet until slaughter), or forage-fed (cattle are fed solely on

roughage until slaughter). In addition to traditional strategies, early weaning cattle, in which

cattle are weaned at approximately 150 days of age as compared to more conventional weaning

of > 200 days, can be employed as a management strategy (Myers et al., 1999). Early weaned

calves may enter the feed lot directly and be fed grain or enter a backgrounding program.

Calf-fed cattle had greater ADG and decreased WBSF, but were approximately 100 kg

lighter and 120 days younger than yearling-fed cattle when fed until the lipid content of the

longissimus muscle was predicted to be 4.5% (based on Angus x Hereford crossbreed breed data;

Dikeman et al., 1985b). When calf-fed cattle, fed on concentrate diet for 217 days, and yearling-

fed cattle, backgrounded on Bermuda grass for 124 days then fed a concentrate diet for 93 days,

were slaughtered at 16 months of age, no differences in WBSF or ADG during the study period

were reported, but calf-fed cattle were 76 kg heavier as compared with yearling-fed cattle (Harris

et al., 1997). In contrast, when calf-fed cattle, fed concentrated diet for 224 days, and yearling-

fed cattle, backgrounded on native pasture for 120 days then fed a concentrate diet for 182 days,

were fed to an equal ending live weight of approximately 505 kg, no differences in WBSF were

Page 11: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

5

reported, but yearling fed cattle had 0.37 kg/d greater ADG compared with calf-fed cattle fed a

high concentrate diet (Harris et al., 1997). Other studies support yearling-fed cattle had greater

ADG than calf-fed cattle during the finishing phase (Dikeman et al., 1985a; Lunt and Orme,

1987; Short et al., 1999; Sainz and Vernazza Paganini, 2004; Anderson et al., 2005). The

increase in ADG during the finishing period may be caused by the quality of forage consumed

during backgrounding.

Compensatory gain is a condition in which animals, that have experienced depressed

growth rates over a long period of time due to restricted dietary intake or inadequate nutrients,

have accelerated rates of gain after the dietary restriction is resolved, or the animal is fed a

properly formulated diet (Lawrence et al., 2012). Cattle undergoing compensatory gain had

increased ADG and feed efficiency when compared with cattle provided ad libitum access to

feed (ADG of 1.56 compared with 1.18 kg/d and feed efficiency of 4.5 to 5.6 DM/kg gain,

respectively; Fox et al., 1972).

Energy Source

In addition to rate of gain, dietary energy sources can affect tenderness. In North

America, cattle are finished predominantly grain-based diets (Vasconcelos and Galyean, 2007).

Forage-based finishing systems are used in other countries where pasture is plentiful, i.e. South

America and New Zealand, or as a niche market alternative in the U.S. No differences in quality

grade were reported for cattle fed to equal ending live, but cattle fed pelletized alfalfa took 35

days longer to reach the target ending live weight and were tougher (less tender) in sensory panel

evaluations than concentrate-fed cattle (Oltjen et al., 1971). Steaks from cattle fed an alfalfa

silage based diet did not differ in WBSF when compared with steaks from cattle fed concentrate

based diet; however, forage-fed cattle had reduced ADG (-0.29 kg/d) and reduced HCW (-44.6

Page 12: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

6

kg), when compared with concentrate-fed cattle, slaughtered at an equal number of days on feed

(Mandell et al., 1998). Overall, forage-fed cattle were slower growing (reduced ADG) when

compared with concentrate-fed cattle; however tenderness results were inconsistent.

Time on Feed

The length of time cattle are fed an increased concentrate diet can alter palatability of the

meat from the animal, particularly tenderness. Warner-Bratzler shear force was reduced by 0.44

kg in yearling-fed cattle fed a concentrate diet for 139 days prior to slaughter compared with

yearling-fed cattle fed for 251 days (Epley et al., 1968). Others reported WBSF for steaks from

calf-fed Hereford cattle decreased by approximately 1.5 kg from 120 to 150 days on feed, but

remained unchanged until 240 days on feed at which WBSF increased by approximately 1.5 kg

(Zinn et al., 1970a, b). Short et al. (1999) reported that steaks from calf-fed Charolais crossbred

cattle were most tender after cattle were fed a concentrate diet for 270 days, however, yearling-

fed cattle reached the same level of tenderness after 90 days on a concentrate diet. Others

reported no differences in WBSF of steaks from yearling cattle fed for 100 to 160 days (Tatum et

al., 1980; Van Koevering et al., 1995). The optimum time on feed for cattle varies greatly

among studies due to starting live weight, genetic potential, or physiological age; however, the

aforementioned indicate that the optimum time on feed to achieve maximum tenderness in

yearling-fed British cattle breeds is within 90 to 160 days.

Average Daily Gain

Altering ADG can affect WBSF by changing the rate of protein turnover. Correlations

between ADG and 7 d WBSF have been reported (r = -0.17; Smith et al., 2007). Other studies

have reported stronger relationships between 7 d WBSF and ADG (r = -0.40; Shackelford et al.,

1994b). Both studies indicated as ADG increased WBSF decreased. However, most studies

have evaluated the relationship between ADG and tenderness were confounded with sources of

Page 13: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

7

energy as discussed in the previous section; therefore, the results are not conclusive. Other

researchers reported cattle fed a high concentrate diet to achieve an ADG of 1.34 kg/d for 210

days produced steaks with WBSF values of 1.84 kg less than cattle fed a low concentrate diet

(ADG of 0.70 kg/d) for 230 days; however, marbling score was greater for cattle with an ADG

of 1.34 kg/d compared with ADG of 0.70 kg/d, small (4.99% extractable lipid) compared with

traces (2.48% extractable lipid), respectively (Savell et al., 1986; Aberle et al., 1981). Other

studies reported Friesian calves fed two dietary energy levels to attain growth rates of 0.77 and

1.20 kg/d until an ending live weight of 250 kg had a WBSF of 1.3 kg less for the faster growing

calves, and also reported a 0.70 correlation coefficient between ADG and sensory panel

tenderness (Therkildsen et al., 2002a, b). However, other studies reported cattle provided ad

libitum access to feed for 120 days with ADG of 0.34, 0.77, and 1.42 kg/d did not differ in

WBSF (Fishell et al., 1985). Another study fed cattle (beginning body weight 280 kg) 4

different dietary energy levels to achieve ADG of -0.21, 0.81, 1.18, and 1.35 kg/d for up to 175

days without finding any differences in WBSF (Burson et al., 1980).

Meat Characteristics

Muscle Proteins

Skeletal muscle contains 3 categories of proteins: sarcoplasmic, myofibrillar, and

stromal. Sarcoplasmic proteins include the glycolytic and proteolyic enzymes along with other

cytoplasmic proteins. Sarcoplasmic proteins comprise 30 to 35% of the protein in muscle tissue

(Goll et al., 2008). Myofibrillar proteins include both contractile and cytoskeletal proteins and

are responsible for the contractile properties of the myofibril. Myofibrillar proteins are the

largest class of proteins in skeletal muscle and comprise 55 to 60% of the protein in muscle

Page 14: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

8

tissue (Goll et al., 2008). Stromal proteins are extracellular proteins, primarily collagen.

Stromal proteins comprise 10 to 15% of the protein in muscle tissue (Goll et al., 2008).

Sarcoplasmic proteins are located in the intracellular fluid and are responsible for

metabolic pathways in the cell (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). Cathepsins, caspases, proteasomes,

and calpains are proteolyic enzymes found in the sarcoplasm of muscle cells (Lawrie and

Ledward, 2006). Cathepsins are lysosomal bound proteases that function at an optimal pH

between 3.5 and 6.5 (Goll et al., 2008). Cathepsins are inhibited by cystatin (Koohmaraie et al.,

1991b). Cystatin is a sarcoplasmic protein in the intracellular fluid; therefore, cathepsin activity

outside of a lysosome is unlikely due to the presence of cystatin (Koohmaraie et al., 1991b).

Caspases are proteases involved in apoptosis of cells. Caspases require signaling from either

extrinsic or intrinsic pathways to become active. Proteasomes are protein complexes that

function to degrade damaged or excess proteins in a cell. Proteasomes are responsible for

targeted protein degradation and require proteins to be labeled with ubiquitin prior to

degradation. Calpains are calcium dependent proteases. Different calpain isoforms require

different concentrations of calcium to become active. Calpain 1 (µ-calpain) requires a calcium

concentration of 50 to 100 µM to become active; whereas, calpain 2 (m-calpain) requires a

calcium concentration of 1000 to 2000 µM to become active (Du and McCormick, 2009).

Calpain activity is mainly regulated by calcium concentration and calpastatin, which is an

inhibitor of calpains.

Myofibrillar proteins comprise the majority of protein in muscle tissue and are

responsible for the contractile function of the muscle cell (Taylor et al., 1995). The location of

the myofibrillar proteins is presented in Figure 1. Myosin (thick filament) is the most abundant

protein in skeletal muscle and is responsible for converting chemical energy to mechanical

Page 15: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

9

energy during muscle contraction. Actin (thin filament) is a globular protein used along with

myosin during muscle contraction. Tropomyosin is wrapped around the actin filament covering

the myosin binding site during the resting phase (Arakawa et al., 1970). The movement of

tropomyosin from the actin binding site is controlled by troponin proteins (troponin I, troponin T,

and troponin C) located on the tropomyosin filament. Alpha-actinin is a cytoskeletal protein

responsible for binding actin filaments to the Z-disk. Nebulin runs the length of the actin

filament and maybe responsible for regulating the length of the actin filament. Titin, one of the

largest proteins in a muscle cell, spans from the Z-disk to the M-line of a sarcomere and

regulates the resting length of a sarcomere. Costameres are structural components of skeletal

muscle that bind the Z-disk to the sarcolemma of muscle cells. Costameres are comprised of

desmin, vinculin, ankyrin, dystrophin, γ-actin, β-spectrin, and talin (Taylor et al., 1995). Desmin

also serves to maintain structural integrity by binding adjacent Z-disk within a muscle cell

together (Taylor et al., 1995).

Sarcomere Length

A sarcomere is considered the basic unit of muscle contraction and is defined as the

distance between adjacent Z-lines (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). A sarcomere is comprised

mainly of myosin filaments (thick) and actin filaments (thin). Myosin filaments are contractile

proteins and are approximately 1.5 µm in length and make up part of the A-band along with actin

filaments. The A-band is the area in which actin and myosin filaments interact during

contraction. In a relaxed sarcomere, the overlap of actin and myosin filaments is reduced

allowing for the H-band to increase in size. The H-band is comprised of myosin and spans the

center of the sarcomere or M-line. The I-band is located on each end of a sarcomere and actually

crosses adjacent Z-lines and is comprised of actin filaments. The I-band contains the structural

attachment of actin filaments to the Z-line at each end of the sarcomere. Actin filaments are

Page 16: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

10

approximately 1.0 µm in length. The length of the actin and myosin filaments along with the

structural proteins of the Z-line contribute to 3.6 µm of a fully stretched sarcomere and to 1.6 µm

of a fully contracted sarcomere. However, studies have reported sarcomere lengths of 1.44 µm

indicating that the myosin filament has ruptured through the Z-line (Grayson and Lawrence,

2013). Sarcomere lengths in the longissimus muscle range from 1.53 to 2.08 µm (Smulders et

al., 1990). Postmortem ATP depletion in muscle causes the formation of permanent bonds

between actin and myosin in the sarcomere; this is termed rigor mortis (Lawrie and Ledward,

2006). Once the rigid actomyosin bonds are formed, the lengths of the sarcomere can no longer

change. Sarcomere length depends on the position of the muscle within a carcass at the onset of

rigor mortis; therefore, muscle in a state of compression will have shorter sarcomeres than

muscles in a state of tension.

The effects of sarcomere length on shear force have been examined in studies comparing

Achilles carcass suspension (carcass is suspended by the Achilles tendon, conventional method

in North America) to Tenderstretch carcass suspension (carcass is suspended by the obturator

foramen). Achilles suspension resulted in shorter sarcomere lengths in the longissimus dorsi as

compared with Tenderstretch suspension, 1.80 µm and 2.31 µm respectively, causing the longer

sarcomeres to have more desirable tenderness scores and reduced Volodkevich Bite

Tenderometer values by 18% at 2 d and 14% at 7 d postmortem (Joseph and Connolly, 1977).

No measurements of proteolysis were performed in the previous study (Joseph and Connolly,

1977); therefore the decrease in magnitude of the difference between the suspension methods at

increased aging time could be caused by proteolysis. Another method to increase sarcomere

length in the longissimus muscle is the Tendercut method in which the vertebral column is cut

leaving the weight of the fore-quarter suspended by the longissimus muscle. Beaty et al. (1999)

Page 17: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

11

reported a sarcomere length increase of 0.18 µm in the longissimus thoracis and reduced WBSF

by 1.85 kg when using the Tendercut method. Others reported that by adding a device to

manipulate the hanging position of the fore shank of the carcass prior to the onset of rigor mortis,

sarcomere length increased by 0.78 µm and reduced 7 d WBSF by 0.69 kg in the serratus

ventralis (Grayson and Lawrence, 2013). Shackelford et al. (1994b) reported a -0.18 correlation

coefficient between WBSF at 7 d postmortem and sarcomere length, reporting as sarcomere

length increased, WBSF was reduced. In summary, changes in sarcomere length impact meat

tenderness; however, sarcomere length can only account 30% of the variability in sensory panel

tenderness evaluations (Smulders et al., 1990).

Protein Turnover

Postnatal muscle growth occurs mainly by an increase in cell size (hypertrophy). As a

result, the relationship of protein synthesis to protein degradation is important to the rate of

postnatal muscle hypertrophy. Hypertrophy occurs when protein synthesis is greater than protein

degradation. Researchers have proposed myofibrillar proteins are degraded causing

myofilaments to be released from the sarcomere (Goll et al., 2008). In this method, calpains

cleave titin, nebulin, desmin and filiman from the Z-disk causing the Z-disk to no longer be

tethered to the sarcolemma (Goll et al., 2003). Calpains facilitate the release of the thin filament

by degrading tropomyosin and troponin (Goll et al., 1992). Calpains cleave the proteins

associated with the M-line causing the release of the thick filament (Goll et al., 2008). Calpains

do not degrade proteins to amino acids (AA); however, the release of the proteins from the

myofibril allows proteasomes to degrade the proteins to AA (Goll et al., 2008). Therefore,

protein turnover may be regulated by calpastatin activity or expression. Beta-adrenergic agonists

decrease protein degradation in most meat producing species (Koohmaraie et al., 2002).

Administration of beta agonists can cause an increase in calpastatin activity and gene expression

Page 18: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

12

(Parr et al., 1992). Decreased protein degradation involved in protein turnover in the animal

during hypertrophy negatively impacts postmortem protein degradation and results in a less

tender product (Koohmaraie et al., 1991a).

Protein Degradation

The degradation of cytoskeletal proteins (titin, nebulin, filamin, vinculin, desmin, and

dystrophin) by proteases is considered to be the main reason meat becomes more tender during

postmortem aging. Three proteolysis systems have been studied, cathepsins, proteasomes, and

calpains. However, none of these proteolysis systems alone can explain all of the postmortem

changes in meat tenderness.

Calpains are calcium-dependent proteases involved in postmortem tenderization.

Calpains do not degrade actin and myosin; however calpains are responsible for Z-line

degradation (Taylor et al., 1995). The calpain system uses different isoforms of calcium-

dependent cysteine proteases to degrade cytoskeletal proteins (titin, nebulin, desmin, and

filamin) in muscle (Rowe et al., 2004). Many different isoforms of calpains have been

discovered over the past few decades. Calpains 1, 2, and 10 tend to cause postmortem

tenderization in meat by degrading nebulin and desmin (Goll et al., 2003), with calpain 10 being

the most correlated with increased tenderization (Ilian et al., 2004). As muscle is converted to

meat, changes in the microenvironment cause an increase in oxidation (Rowe et al., 2004).

Oxidation can affect the activity of µ- and m-calpain (1- and 2-calpain) by oxidizing a cysteine

in the active site (Guttmann et al., 1997). Calpains require the cysteine in the active site to be

reduced for activation. The release of Ca++ ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum causes

calcium-activated sarcoplasmic factors to become active postmortem, i.e. calpains and

calpastatin. Calcium is released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum as postmortem carcass

Page 19: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

13

temperature decreases. Therefore, the concentration of sarcoplasmic free calcium in beef muscle

changes from 16 µM at 40 min postmortem to 210 µM by 4 days postmortem (Ji and Takahashi,

2006). Calpain 1 has maximum activity at a calcium concentrations between 50 and 100 µM;

therefore, calcium concentrations postmortemly allow for maximum activity caplain 1. Calpain

2 has maximum activity at calcium concentrations between 1000 and 2000 µM; therefore,

calpain 2 may not be active postmortem (Du and McCormick, 2009). Calpains do not continue

to function for extended periods of time, since calpains will autolysis (Dransfield, 1992; Du and

McCormick, 2009). Calpastatin inhibits calpains from binding to structural proteins in

myofibrils (Mellgren et al., 1989).

Shackelford et al. (1994a) reported a genetic correlation of rg = 0.50 and phenotypic

correlation of rp = 0.27 between calpastatin activity and 7 d WBSF. O'Connor et al. (1997)

reported calpastatin activity had greater phenotypic correlations with WBSF at less than 7 days

postmortem (r ≥ 0.40); whereas, correlations at 14 d and 21 d were r = 0.27 and r = 0.24,

respectively. Other studies reported a similar correlation between calpastatin activity and 7 d

WBSF; however, the correlation for WBSF at 14 d postmortem was greater (r = 0.44; Riley et

al., 2003). Another study reported a correlation of r = 0.15 between 14 d WBSF and calpastatin

activity (Wulf et al., 1996). The mean calpastatin activity reported by Shackelford et al. (1994a)

was 2.8 units/gram; whereas, all other studies discussed (O’Connor et al., 1997; Wulf et al.,

1996; Riley et al., 2003) had calpastatin activities greater than 3.26 units/gram. Therefore as

time postmortem increases, the correlation between calpastatin activity and WBSF decreases.

Proteolysis of the structural proteins causes a weakening of the myofibril; thereby,

increasing tenderness (Laville et al., 2009). Different species undergo postmortem tenderization

at different rates with pork becoming tender at a faster rate than lamb, and beef becoming tender

Page 20: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

14

at a slower rate than either pork or lamb (Koohmaraie et al., 1991b). Shackelford et al. (1994a)

reported a genetic correlation of -0.52 between ADG and calpastatin activity; whereas, the

phenotypic correlation was -0.15. Another study reported genetic correlation lower than

previously stated (rg = -0.18) along with the phenotypic correlation (rp = 0.03; Smith et al.,

2007). The previously stated correlations support the hypothesis that faster growing cattle

should be more tender, because increased calpastatin activity negatively impacts protein

degradation and tenderness.

Carcass parameters have a role in postmortem tenderization by either affecting pH

decline or enzymatic activity. Calpastatin is better able to inhibit calpains at a greater pH, but as

pH declines and Ca++ ion concentration in the sarcoplasm increases postmortem, the ability of

calpastatin to inhibit calpains is reduced (Purchas et al., 1999). In a study comparing the effects

of electrical stimulation in Bos indicus and Bos Taurus cattle, a faster pH decline along with a

faster chill rate caused calpains to quickly overcome the inhibitory effects of calpastatin, but a

decreased temperature decline and decreased pH levels caused calpains to prematurely degrade

(Hwang and Thompson, 2001). Crouse et al. (1991) reported chill rate was related to both

adjusted fat thickness and loin muscle (LM) area with correlation coefficients of 0.49 and 0.54,

respectively. Carcasses having a greater fat thickness will have a reduced chill rate due to the

insulative properties of fat; whereas, heavier carcasses will also chill at a slower rate than smaller

carcasses due to the amount of heat energy in the carcass. The myofibril fragmentation index

can serve as a method to measure proteolysis, but may not be as accurate in carcasses that have

undergone electrical stimulation (a process in which carcasses are electrically stimulated prior to

the onset of rigor mortis to speed the onset of rigor mortis and increase the rate of pH decline),

since stimulation may rupture myofibrils.

Page 21: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

15

Cathepsins are stored in lysosomes in the sarcoplasmic reticulum, but require postmortem

disruption of lysosomes in order to be released with disruption occurring more readily at greater

temperatures (Dutson, 1983). A review of cathepsins reported no impact on postmortem

proteolysis at a normal ultimate pH of approximately 5.4; however, cathepsins are active at pH

levels between 4.0 and 6.0 but activity increases as muscle conditions become more acidic

(Dutson, 1983; Hopkins and Thompson, 2002).

Proteasomes such as multicatalytic protease complex can degrade myofibrillar proteins

(nebulin and troponin T; Lamare et al., 2002). Proteasomes have significant activity across

normal pH range of postmortem muscle and remain active for approximately 7 days postmortem

(Lamare et al., 2002). However, the size of the multiple catalytic core of the proteasome

complex prevents the degradation of intact myofibrils (Lee et al., 2010). Therefore, proteasomes

may be involved in further degradation after the myofibrils have been disrupted by other

proteases.

Rate of pH Decline

Anaerobic glycolysis uses glycogen to produce ATP and lactic acid causing a decline in

muscle pH (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). The ultimate pH (UPH) can cause denaturation, a

change in quaternary or tertiary structure, of muscle protein and change the rate or degree for

proteolysis (Laville et al., 2009). Changes in UPH may affect the solubility or activity of

proteolyic enzymes. Purchas et al. (1999) found that an UPH of approximately 5.9 resulted in

greater shear force values relative to UPH of 6.8 and 5.6, independent of aging time. Wulf et al.

(2002) reported beef with a pH of 6.00 had a 1.75 kg greater WBSF as compared with beef with

a pH of 5.53. Another study reported a low correlation (r = 0.14, P < 0.01) between 7 d WBSF

and 48 hrs postmortem pH (Shackelford et al., 1994a). Myofibrillar fragmentation decreased at a

Page 22: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

16

pH of 5.9 as compared with pH between 6.4 to 7.0 and 5.4 to 5.6 (Purchas et al., 1999). Calpains

have an optimal pH range between 7.2 and 7.8 with activity decreasing as pH decreases;

however, at pH below 5.7 calpastatin activity is decreased (Kendall et al., 1993). The increased

tenderness at pH levels greater than 6.4 could be associated with increased calpain activity since

the pH is closer to the optimum pH range. Whereas, the increase in tenderness at pH levels less

than 5.7 could be attributed to decreased calpastatin activity. Therefore, UPH may have a role in

rate or extent of postmortem tenderization.

Muscle Fiber Type

Muscle fibers are classified by two methods, either identifying the myosin heavy chain

present in the myofibril or staining to measure myosin ATPase activity and metabolic activity.

When classified by myosin heavy chain, four different myosin heavy chains (MyHC-2a, -2x, -2b,

and -1) are used to differentiate muscle fibers: Type I (MyHC-1) slow red oxidative fibers, Type

IIa (MyHC-2a) fast white glycolytic fibers with intermediate oxidative capability, Type IIx

(MyHC-2x) are similar to Type IIa but have a faster contraction speed, and Type IIb (MyHC-2b)

are faster than Types IIa or IIx but have limited oxidative metabolism (Du and McCormick,

2009; Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). When classified using staining methods, myosin ATPase

activity staining is used to determine rate of contraction either slow β fibers or fast α fibers;

whereas, metabolic staining with NADH dehydrogenase or succinate dehydrogenase is used to

determine oxidative capacity, either R for strong oxidative capability or W for weak oxidative

capability (Du and McCormick, 2009). Different muscles have different ratios of glycolytic to

oxidative muscle fibers; therefore, the ratio of these fiber types could also explain the differences

in postmortem tenderization. Ouali (1990) reported in a review, glycolytic fibers had a faster

rate of postmortem tenderization than oxidative fibers. However, Ouali (1990) reported calpain

concentration was greater in oxidative fibers than in glycolytic fibers, but the calpain activity in

Page 23: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

17

oxidative fibers was reduced or inhibited. In agreement, Whipple et al. (1990) reported a 0.26

correlation coefficient between WBSF and percentage αW fibers and a correlation coefficient of

-0.27 between WBSF and percentage αR fibers. Calkins et al. (1981) reported a 28.85

coefficient of determination (R2) for shear force of cattle with overall maturity score of A when

using percentage of αW fiber, mean αW fiber area, and total αW fiber area; whereas, in all cattle

maturities examined a coefficient of determination of 18.71 was reported when using mean βR

fiber diameter, total αR fiber area, percentage αR fiber area, and percentage α-white fiber area.

Muscle Fiber Diameter

Muscle fiber diameter may play an important role in overall meat tenderness. Each

muscle consists of different fiber diameters based on function of the muscle and fiber types

present. Different fiber types greatly impact muscle fiber diameter with βR being approximately

half the diameter of αW in the longissimus lumborum of cattle (Du and McCormick, 2009).

Muscles that are used for more controlled movements have smaller fiber diameters; whereas,

muscles that are used for locomotion have larger fiber diameters (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006).

An early study by Hiner et al. (1953) reported as cattle increase in age, the diameter of the

muscle fibers increase. Additionally, Tuma et al. (1962) reported as cattle increase in age, the

diameter of muscle fibers increase; however, the standard deviation for muscle fiber diameter

increases with age. The increase in diameter with an increase in age is expected because muscles

increase in size via muscle cell hypertrophy. Many studies have reported correlation coefficients

greater than 0.51 between longissimus shear force and muscle fiber diameter (Hiner et al., 1953;

Tuma et al., 1962), indicating an increase in fiber diameter increases shear force. Crouse et al.

(1991) reported muscle fiber size is important in tenderness of meat at 1 and 3 days postmortem

and becomes less important at 6 and 14 days postmortem. The effects of muscle fiber diameter

agree with the findings concerning muscle fiber type.

Page 24: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

18

Connective Tissue

Collagen is an important means of support and is involved in the transfer of contractile

force in muscles. Twenty-nine different forms of collagen have been identified, with each type

having a different primary structure (Du and McCormick, 2009). Bailey and Light (1989)

reported that four types of collagen, distinguished by alpha chains, Type I ([𝛼1(𝐼)]2𝛼2), Type II

([𝛼1(𝐼𝐼)]3), Type III ([𝛼1(𝐼𝐼𝐼)]3), and Type IV (𝛼1(𝐼𝑉)[𝛼2(𝐼𝑉)]2), are important in meat

tenderness. Collagen in muscle tissue can be classified into four layers: epimysium, perimysium,

endomysium, and basement membrane. The epimysium is the outer most layer of connective

tissue surrounding an individual muscle; whereas, the perimysium surrounds individual groups

of muscle fibers and contains larger blood vessels and nerves (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). The

endomysium surrounds each muscle fiber and is a thin non-fibrous sheath (Lawrie and Ledward,

2006). The basement membrane surrounds the sarcolemma complex of a myofibril and is

composed of less than half collagen (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). Each layer is formed by

different types and amounts of collagen (Bailey et al., 1979; Rowe, 1981; Light and Champion,

1984; Light et al., 1985; Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). The epimysium comprises 1.2% of the dry

muscle weight, and is comprised of 22.2% collagen (Light and Champion, 1984). Type III

collagen is 16.4% of the total amount of Type I and III collagen in the epimysium (Light and

Champion, 1984). The perimysium comprises 4.7% of the dry muscle weight, and is comprised

of 95.3% collagen (Light and Champion, 1984). Type III collagen is 28.0% of the total amount

of Type I and III collagen in the perimysium (Light and Champion, 1984). The endomysium

comprises 0.3% of the dry muscle weight, and is comprised of 42.4% collagen (Light and

Champion, 1984). Type III collagen is 62.3% of the total amount of Type I and III collagen in

the endomysium (Light and Champion, 1984). The connections between each layer of connective

tissue allow for the transfer of force required for movement.

Page 25: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

19

Tropocollagen is formed by individual chains of collagen forming a left-handed helix and

then three left-handed helical chains intertwining to form a larger right-handed helix (Lawrie and

Ledward, 2006). Tropocollagen molecules aggrade together to form a fibril, and with fibrils

aggrade together to form fibers (Lawrie and Ledward, 2006). However, with all the different

forms and types of collagen, the proportion in muscle is only about two percent (Bailey, 1985;

Light et al., 1985). Of the two percent collagenous tissue in muscle, elastin comprises

approximately two to three percent of the total amount (Du and McCormick, 2009). Studies

have reported a lack of relationship between total collagen and tenderness (Cross et al., 1973;

Bailey, 1985); however, research has been conducted to examine the effect of changes in the

ratio of Type III to Type I collagen in muscle tissue on WBSF,

Light et al. (1985) reported no effect of Type III collagen fiber content on the texture of

six bovine muscles. Burson et al. (1986) reported the percentage of Type III intramuscular

collagen in longissimus muscle does not affect WBSF, but as the percentage of Type III

intramuscular collagen increased collagen solubility decreased (r = -0.49). Meat tenderness may

be more related to collagen crosslinking than amount of collagen present.

As an animal ages, the number of collagen cross links increases; however, not all

collagen cross links impact tenderness equally. Lawrie and Ledward (2006) reported the

formation of non-reducible links among three or more chains causing the formation of a three-

dimensional structure greatly increased tensile strength. The formation of these three-

dimensional structures is considered the maturation of collagen. Thus, as the number of mature

bonds in collagen increases, the amount of thermal shrinkage increases when meat is cooked

(Lawrie and Ledward, 2006; Lepetit, 2007). As the number of mature collagen cross links

increases, meat becomes tougher. As meat is cooked, some immature collagen becomes soluble.

Page 26: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

20

Purslow (2005) reported as cooking temperature increased from 20 to 50 oC, the perimysium

strength increased, but decreased at temperatures greater than 50 oC. Lepetit (2007) reported a

0.83 correlation coefficient between the sum of heat stable collagen cross links (Pyridinoline,

Ehrlich Chromogen, and Dihydroxylysinorleucine; µmole per gram of wet muscle) and WBSF.

Also, the rate of collagen turnover has a role in tenderness. As animals age, collagen

must be remodeled to allow for the increase in size of the muscle fibers (Purslow, 2005). Miller

et al. (1987) reported a 1.0 kg decrease in shear force and an increase in soluble collagen in

mature cows fed a high energy diet for 84 days to achieve an ADG of 1.0 kg/d as compared to

mature cows fed a low energy diet to achieve an ADG of 0.1 kg/d. Duckett et al. (2007) reported

an increase in total collagen between yearling cattle finished at two different growth rates;

however, no differences in soluble collagen or 14 d WBSF were reported. These finding indicate

that soluble collagen percentage impacts WBSF; however, yearling cattle do not differ in soluble

collagen percentage.

Immunoblotting

Protein Extraction and Solubilization

Protein identification requires proteins to be extracted from muscle tissue and solubilized

to prevent aggregation. Proteins are extracted by mechanically lysing the cells in a buffer

solution containing a detergent. The buffer solution increases the solubility of proteins by

optimizing the pH or ionic strength of the solution. Detergents disrupt hydrophobic interactions

between proteins to increase the solubility of the protein in aqueous extraction solutions.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is a detergent used to disrupt non-covalent tertiary protein bonds;

therefore, SDS causes disruption of the native confirmation of the protein. The disruption of the

native confirmation causes enzymes in the samples to denature and become inactive. The

Page 27: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

21

denaturing of enzymes prevents further proteolysis from occurring. After extraction, the tertiary

and secondary structures are denatured by heating the samples in the presence of SDS and beta-

mercaptoethanol. Beta-mercaptoethanol aids in breaking of the disulfide bonds. Sodium dodecyl

sulfate causes the proteins to have a negative net charge. The SDS creates a charge to mass ratio

that is approximately the same for all proteins or polypeptide chains in the sample (Switzer and

Garrity, 1999).

Protein Separation

Sodium dodecyl sulfate – polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is used to

separate proteins based on molecular weight. Anionic proteins are separated using an electric

current flowing through a polyacrylamide gel. Protein samples along with a molecular weight

standard are pipetted into the well of a polyacrylamide gel. Molecular weight standard is a

mixture of purified proteins with known molecular weights. Comparison of the molecular

weight standards to the samples protein allows for the determination of relative protein weight.

Proteins will group together based on molecular weight and move through the polyacrylamide

gel toward the positively charged electrode. The mobility of the proteins is regulated by the

friction between the protein and the acrylamide in the gel. Therefore, polyacrylamide gels are

formulated to separate proteins in a specific weight range. Large proteins (45 to 200 kDa) are

separated using polyacrylamide gels containing 7.5% acrylamide; whereas, small proteins (5 to

45 kDa) are separated using gels containing 20% acrylamide (Switzer and Garrity, 1999). The

voltage applied to the gel controls the speed of the interactions between the proteins and the

acrylamide. As voltage increases the overall rate of proteins migrating through the gel will

increase. At high voltages, protein resolution will decrease because of increased temperature of

the gel. Temperature of the gel should not exceed 35 to 40 ºC (Schagger, 2006). Also, high

voltages can cause gels to melt. However, low voltages cause protein bands to broaden and could

Page 28: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

22

result in samples overlapping. After proteins are separated in SDS-PAGE gels, proteins are

electrophoretically transferred to either polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) or nitrocellulose

membranes for protein identification.

Western Blotting

Western blotting uses antibodies to identify specific proteins. The membranes are

incubated in a blocking solution to saturate all of the membrane not already binding sample

proteins. Blocking solutions must not contain any proteins of interest or protein that can bind

with the antibodies used to identify the proteins. Non-fat dry milk is commonly used in a

blocking solution when researchers are working with muscle proteins. The proteins in the non-

fat dry milk bind to the remaining areas of the membrane without transferred muscle proteins.

After blocking, membranes are incubated in a solution containing a monoclonal antibody

(primary antibody) of the protein of interest. Monoclonal antibodies are produced from identical

B-lymphocytes and have the same binding affinity for the same epitope on a protein. Therefore,

monoclonal antibodies are able to bind very specifically to an epitope on a protein. Membranes

are washed to remove any unbound or non-specifically bound primary antibody. A solution

containing a polyclonal antibody (secondary antibody) specific to epitopes on the primary

antibody is applied to the membrane. The polyclonal antibodies are covalently conjugated to an

enzyme, such as horseradish peroxidase (Switzer and Garrity, 1999). Membranes are then

washed to remove any unbound or non-specifically bound secondary antibody. The substrate for

the enzyme on the secondary antibody is applied to the membrane causing the enzyme to emit a

luminescent signal. The luminescent signal is visualized using a gel imaging system. Images of

the gel are subjected to densitometry analysis to quantify the strength of the signal. The strength

of the signal of the sample is compared to the signal strength of a standard on the same gel. The

ratio of the signal strengths is reported as the ratio to reference of the sample.

Page 29: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

23

Immunoblotting has proven to be a valid method used for identification of proteins or

polypeptide fragments from proteins. Immunoblotting allows researchers to measure the percent

change in proportion of an intact protein or polypeptide fragments from a degraded protein to a

reference sample. Therefore, immunoblotting can be used to determine changes in a protein at

specific time points during postmortem aging. One limitation to immunoblotting is direct

comparisons of the values from immunoblotting across studies can be difficult. Reference

standard used to determine the proportion are not standardized among studies.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Power Analysis

Statistical power is the ability to reject a hypothesis that states 2 treatments are the same

and conclude the treatments are different. Statistical power calculations balance the probability

of a Type I error (alpha, 1 – confidence level, concluding two treatments different when the

treatments are the same) and the probability of a Type II error (beta, concluding 2 treatments are

the same when the treatments are different). Statistical power allows for the calculation of

sample size needed to detect a difference between treatments based on a population’s standard

deviation of the term to be analyzed. Consumers are able to discern a 0.4 kg difference in WBSF

of longissimus steaks (Igo et al., 2011). Meyer et al. (2005) reported a standard deviation of 0.74

kg in WBSF at 21 d postmortem (n=6). Power of the test is calculated using the equation,

𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = 1 − 𝛽

𝛽 ≈ 𝑃

[

𝑍 <

[

𝑑

√2𝜎2

𝑁/2⁄]

− 𝑍𝑎2

]

Page 30: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

24

where P is the probability of the Z value, N is the number of animals, σ is the standard deviation,

and d is the mean difference of interest (Ott and Longnecker, 2001). Therefore, a sample size of

32 animals would have a power to detect a difference of 0.32 kg of WBSF. If the mean

difference is increased to 0.75 kg, power would increase to 0.79. Sample size at a desired power

can be calculated using the equation,

𝑁 = 2 ∗2𝜎2 ∗ (𝑍𝛽 + 𝑍𝛼

2)2

𝑑2

Therefore, a calculated sample size of 110 animals would be needed to detect a mean difference

of 0.4 kg, with standard deviation of 0.74 kg at an alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.80. As

demonstrated, power is a relationship between the expected mean difference, number of

observations used, and standard deviation of the population.

Regression Analysis

Regression is a statistical analysis that is used in determining the relationship between

variables to predict an outcome (Kutner et al., 2005). Linear regression coefficients are

determined by the ordinary least squares (OLS) method. Ordinary least squares requires the data

to be unbiased and x variables uncorrelated (r = 0). Ordinary least squares method uses sum of

the squared deviations between the observed values from the expected values (Q). The least

squares criterion Q is calculated as follows,

𝑄 = ∑(𝑌𝑖 − 𝛽0 − 𝛽1𝑋𝑖)2

𝑛

𝑖=1

where, β0 is the coefficient of the intercept, β1 is the coefficient of the slope, Yi is the value of the

ith observation of the dependent variable, and Xi is the value of the ith observation of the

Page 31: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

25

independent variable (Kutner et al., 2005). Therefore, the best estimates of β0 and β1 are

obtained when Q is minimized. The efficiency of regression functions is evaluated based on the

coefficient of determination (R2), the amount of variation in the data accounted for in the fitted

function. The coefficient of determination is

𝑅2 =𝑆𝑆𝑅

𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑂

where,

𝑆𝑆𝑅 = ∑(�̂�𝑖 − �̅�)2

𝑖

and

𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑂 = ∑(𝑦𝑖 − �̅�)2

𝑖

Therefore, the coefficient of determination increases as the sum of squares regression (SSR)

increases in relation to the sums of squares total (SSTO). Multiple linear regression evaluates

the effect of multiple predictor variables on the response variable. For multiple regression, the

model is

𝑌𝑖 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝑋𝑖1 + ⋯+ 𝛽𝑝−1𝑋𝑖,𝑝−1 + 𝜀𝑖

where, p is the number of predictor variables in the model (Kutner et al., 2005). The coefficient

of determination is not an accurate means to determine the efficiency of a multiple linear

regression model. The coefficient of determination will increase as predictor variables are added

to the model even if the added predictor variable does not account for variation in the model.

Therefore, an adjusted coefficient of determination is used to account for the increased

Page 32: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

26

complexity of the model when additional predictor variables are added. The adjusted coefficient

of determination is

𝐴𝑑𝑗. 𝑅2 = 1 − (1 − 𝑅2)𝑛 − 1

𝑛 − 𝑝 − 1

Adjusted coefficient of determination penalizes for the addition of predictor variables to the

model that do not account for variation. However, the coefficient of determination can be

influenced by data points unequally.

Observations made at extremes can have increased influence (leverage) on the fitted

function since no other points are able to mitigate the observations effect. Statistical tests,

DFBETA and DFFITS, are used to measure influence on the fitted function. The DFBETA

analysis measures the leverage of the X(i) observation on the regression function coefficients

when the X(i) observation is removed. An observation is considered to have significant leverage

on the regression function coefficient if the absolute DFBETA value is greater than 1 in small to

medium data sets (less than 30 observations) or greater than 2/√𝑛 for large data sets (greater

than 30 observations), where n is the number of experimental units (Kutner et al., 2005;

Cousineau and Chartier, 2010). The DFFIT analysis measures the difference between the fit

value Yi and the predicted value Yi(i) when ith case is omitted (Kutner el al., 2005). An

observation is considered to be influential if the absolute DFFIT value is greater than 1 for small

to medium data sets (less than 30 observations) or greater than 2/√(𝑝

𝑛) for large data sets (more

than 30 observations), where p is the number of parameters in the regression model and n is the

number of experimental units in the data set (Kutner el al., 2005; Cousineau and Chartier, 2010).

Page 33: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

27

Multicollinearity

In multiple linear regression, correlation between predictor variables, multicollinearity,

can affect the regression coefficients and the fit of the function. Multicollinearity causes the

standard errors to be inflated; therefore, the parameters estimates (b) are not stable. Variance

inflation factors (VIF) are used to measure how variance of the regression coefficients are

inflated by linear relations in predicator variables. When VIF values are greater than 10,

regression coefficients may not be significant due to the inflation of the estimated standard

deviations. Remedial measures to correct for multicollinearity include removing predictor

variables from the model or using ridge regression (Kidwell and Lynn Harrington, 1982).

Removal of one or more predictor variables can reduce multicollinearity; however, removal of

predictor variables has limitations. Dropped predictor variables do not add information to the

model and can affect the estimates of the regression coefficients (Kutner et al., 2005). Ridge

regression uses a modified OLS method to determine the estimates of the coefficients (Kidwell

and Lynn Harrington, 1982). The modified OLS introduces a constant bias (c) to minimize Q.

The value for c is determined using ridge trace and VIF. Ridge trace simultaneously plots

estimated ridge standardized regression coefficients for different values of c (Kutner et al.,

2005). As c increases, the ridge estimated standardized regression coefficients will stabilize and

the VIF values for the predictor variables will decrease. The smallest value for c is chosen based

on when the regression coefficients become stable and the VIF values are small. Therefore, the

estimates are bias estimators of the regression coefficients. Ridge regression limits ordinary

inference procedures and causes the distributional properties to be unknown (Kutner et al.,

2005). Therefore, caution must be taken when considering predictor variables for a regression

function.

Page 34: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

28

Model Selection

For every set of predictor variables, 2p-1 different models can be made (Kutner et al.,

2005). Therefore, the evaluation of each combination of predictor variables is critical in

determining the best model to predict the dependent variable. Many different techniques have

been developed to select predictor variables for regression models. Models can be selected

based on the adjusted coefficient of determination. The adjusted coefficient of determination for

all models is determined and the model with the greatest adjust coefficient of determination is

chosen as the best model. Mallow’s Cp is used in model selection to minimize the number of

predictor variables in the final model. Mallow’s Cp compares the predictive ability of a model

containing a subset of the predictor variables to the predictive ability of the full model, model

containing all predictor variables. Mallow Cp is

𝐶𝑝 =𝑆𝑆𝐸𝑝

𝑀𝑆𝐸𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙− (𝑛 − 2𝑝)

where, SSEp is the sums of squares error for the subset model and MSEfull is the mean square

error of the full model (Kutner et al., 2005). Mallow Cp values are compared to the number of

predictor variables in the model. Therefore, the model with Cp ≤ p is the best model for the

prediction. Three automatic methods of model selection, forward selection, backward

elimination, and forward stepwise regression, have been developed. Automatic selection

methods are used in data sets containing 30 or more predictor variables (Kutner et al., 2005).

Forward stepwise fits a linear regression model for each of the predictor variables. The model

with the greatest t* statistic, test if the slope is different from zero 𝑡𝑘∗ =

𝑏𝑘

𝑠{𝑏𝑘}, is selected as the

first predictor variable added to the model (Kutner et al., 2005). A linear regression model is

then refitted using the first predictor variable and each of the remaining predictor variables. The

Page 35: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

29

selection process continues until none of the remaining predictor variables are less than the

predetermined alpha value. Backward elimination begins with a model containing all predictor

variables and evaluates each variable based on the significance. In each step, the least

significant, greatest P-value, predictor variable is dropped from the model. The model is then

refitted and the process continues until all variables in the model are significant at a

predetermined alpha level. Forward stepwise regression is a method that combines both forward

selection and backwards elimination. Forward stepwise regression develops regression models

by adding and deleting predictor variables one at a time based on a preset alpha level. Forward

stepwise regression continues to evaluate predictor variables until none of the remaining

predictor variables are significant at the preset alpha level and all the terms in the model are

significant at the preset alpha level. A major weakness to stepwise automatic selection methods

is that only one model is developed; therefore, other methods, Mallow’s Cp, should be used to

evaluate the model produced by the stepwise selection.

Conclusions

In general, finishing cattle on grain based diets, or aging beef for a specific number of

days cannot fully guarantee tenderness. Therefore, with the emergence of the USDA Guaranteed

Tender Beef program, research focusing on the relation of growth rate and carcass parameters

and their effect on tenderness is important. Furthermore, understanding how growth rate is

related to postmortem proteolysis may allow for more accurate predictions of beef tenderness to

be achieved.

Page 36: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

30

Literature Cited

Aberle, E. D., E. S. Reeves, M. D. Judge, R. E. Hunsley, and T. W. Perry. 1981. Palatability and

muscle characteristics of cattle with controlled weight gain: time on a high energy diet. J.

Ani. Sci. 52: 757-763.

Anderson, R. V., R. J. Rasby, T. J. Klopfenstein, and R. T. Clark. 2005. An evaluation of

production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter. J.

Ani. Sci. 83: 694-704.

Arakawa, N., D. E. Goll, and J. Temple. 1970. Molecular properties of postmortem muscle. 8.

Effect of postmortem storage of α-actinin and the tropomyosin-troponin complex. J. Food

Sci. 35: 703-711.

Bailey, A. J., and N. D. Light. 1989. Connective tissue in meat and meat products. Elsevier

Applied Science, London, UK.

Bailey, A. J. 1985. The role of collagen in the development of muscle and its relationship to

eating quality. J. Ani. Sci. 60: 1580-1587.

Bailey, A. J., D. J. Restall, T. J. Sims, and V. C. Duance. 1979. Meat tenderness:

Immunofluorescent localisation of the isomorphic forms of collagen in bovine muscles of

varying texture. J. Sci. Food Agri. 30: 203-210.

Baruselli, P. S., E. L. Reis, M. O. Marques, L. F. Nasser, and G. A. Bó. 2004. The use of

hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in

tropical climates. Ani. Repro. Sci. 82–83: 479-486.

Beaty, S. L., J. K. Apple, L. K. Rakes, and D. L. Kreider. 1999. Early postmortem skeletal

alterations effect on sarcomere length, myofibrillar fragmentation, and muscle tenderness

of beef from light-weight, brangus heifers. J. Muscle Foods 10: 67-78.

Belew, J. B., J. C. Brooks, D. R. McKenna, and J. W. Savell. 2003. Warner–Bratzler shear

evaluations of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Sci. 64: 507-512.

Boleman, S. J., S. L. Boleman, R. K. Miller, J. F. Taylor, H. R. Cross, T. L. Wheeler, M.

Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, M. F. Miller, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, and J. W.

Savell. 1997. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Ani. Sci.

75:1521-1524.

Burson, D. E., M. C. Hunt, J. A. Unruh, and M. E. Dikeman. 1986. Proportion of types I and III

collagen in longissimus collagen from bulls and steers. J. Ani. Sci. 63: 453-456.

Burson, D. E., M. C. Hunt, D. M. Allen, C. L. Kastner, and D. H. Kropf. 1980. Diet energy

density and time on feed effects on beef longissimus muscle palatability. J. Ani. Sci. 51:

875-881.

Calkins, C. R., T. R. Dutson, G. C. Smith, Z. L. Carpenter, and G. W. Davis. 1981. Relationship

of fiber type composition to marbling and tenderness of bovine muscle. J. Food Sci. 46:

708-710.

Cheeke, P. R. 2005. Applied Animal Nutrition Feeds and Feeding. Pearson Education, Inc., New

Jersey.

Claus, H. L. et al. 2010. Effects of supplementing feedlot steers and heifers with zilpaterol

hydrochloride on Warner–Bratzler shear force interrelationships of steer and heifer

longissimus lumborum and heifer triceps brachii and gluteus medius muscles aged for 7,

14 and 21 days. Meat Sci. 85: 347-355.

Cousineau, D., and S. Chartier. 2010. Outliers detection and treatment: a review. Int. J.

Psychological Research 3: 58-67.

Page 37: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

31

Cross, H. R., Z. L. Carpenter, and G. C. Smith. 1973. Effects of intramuscular collagen and

elastin on bovine muscle tenderness. J. Food Sci. 38: 998-1003.

Crouse, J. D., M. Koohmaraie, and S. D. Seideman. 1991. The relationship of muscle fibre size

to tenderness of beef. Meat Sci. 30: 295-302.

Dikeman, A. D. Dayton, M. C. Hunt, L. Kastner, J. B. Axe, and H. J. Ilg. 1985a. Conventional

versus accelerated beef production with carcass electrical stimulation. J. Ani. Sci. 61:

573-583.

Dikeman, M. E., K. N. Nagele, S. M. Myers, R. R. Schalles, D. H. Kropf, C. L. Kastner, and F.

A. Russo1985b. Accelerated versus conventional beef production and processing. J. Ani.

Sci. 61: 137-150.

Dransfield, E. 1992. Modelling post-mortem tenderisation—iii: role of calpain i in conditioning.

Meat Sci. 31: 85-94.

Du, M., and R. J. McCormick. 2009. Applied Muscle Biology and Meat Sci.. CRC Press, Boca

Raton, Florida.

Duckett, S. K., J. P. S. Neel, R. N. Sonon, Jr., J. P. Fontenot, W. M. Clapham, and G. Scaglia.

2007. Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: ii. ninth-tenth-

eleventh-rib composition, muscle color, and palatability. J. Ani. Sci. 85: 2691-2698.

Dutson, T. R. 1983. Relationship of ph and temperature to disruption of specific muscle proteins

and activity of lysosomal proteases. J. Food Biochem. 7: 223-245.

Epley, R. J. W. C. Stringer, H. B. Hedrick, A. R. Schupp, C. L. Cramer, and R. H. White. 1968.

Influence of sire and length of feeding on palatability of beef steaks. J. Ani. Sci. 27:

1277-1283.

Ferguson, D. M., S.-T. Jiang, H. Hearnshaw, S. R. Rymill, and J. M. Thompson. 2000. Effect of

electrical stimulation on protease activity and tenderness of M. longissimus from cattle

with different proportions of Bos indicus content. Meat Sci. 55: 265-272.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 1996. World livestock

production systems: current status, issues, and trends. FAO Animal Production and

Health Paper No. 127. Rome.

Fishell, V. K., E. D. Aberle, M. D. Judge, and T. W. Perry. 1985. Palatability and muscle

properties of beef as influenced by preslaughter growth rate. J. Ani. Sci. 61: 151-157.

Fox, D. G., R. R. Johnson, R. L. Preston, T. R. Dockerty, and E. W. Klosterman. 1972. Protein

and energy utilization during compensatory growth in beef cattle. J. Ani. Sci. 34: 310-

318.

Frisch, J. E. 1987. Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos indicus x Bos taurus. J.

Agri. Sci. 109: 213-230.

Goll, D. E., G. Neti, S. W. Mares, and V. F. Thompson. 2008. Myofibrillar protein turnover: The

proteasome and the calpains. J. Ani. Sci. 86: E19-E35.

Goll, D. E., V. F. Thompson, H. Li, W. Wei, and J. Cong. 2003. The calpain system.

Physiological Reviews 83: 731-801.

Goll, D. E., V. F. Thompson, R. G. Taylor, and J. A. Christiansen. 1992. Role of the calpain

system in muscle growth. Biochem. 74: 225-237.

Grayson, A. L., and T. E. Lawrence. 2013. Alternative pre-rigor foreshank positioning can

improve beef shoulder muscle tenderness. Meat Sci. 95: 36-41.

Guttmann, R. P., J. S. Elce, P. D. Bell, J. C. Isbell, and G. V. SW. Johnson. 1997. Oxidation

inhibits substrate proteolysis by calpain i but not autolysis. J. Bio. Chem. 272: 2005-

2012.

Page 38: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

32

Harris, J. J., D. K. Lunt, S. B. Smith, W. L. Miles, D. S. Hale, M. Koohmaraie, and J. W. Savell.

1997. Live animal performance, carcass traits, and meat palatability of calf- and cearling-

fed cloned steers. J. Ani. Sci. 75: 986-992.

Hiner, E. L., O. G. Hankins, H. S. Sloane, C. R. Fellers, and E. E. Anderson. 1953. Fiber

diameter in relation to tenderness of beef muslce. J. Food Sci. 18: 364-376.

Hopkins, D. L., and J. M. Thompson. 2002. Factors contributing to proteolysis and disruption of

myofibrillar proteins and the impact on tenderisation in beef and sheep meat. Aus. J.

Agri. Research 53: 149-166.

Hwang, I. H., and J. M. Thompson. 2001. The interaction between pH and temperature decline

early postmortem on the calpain system and objective tenderness in electrically

stimulated beef longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci. 58: 167-174.

Ilian, M. A., A. E.-D. A. Bekhit, and R. Bickerstaffe. 2004. Does the newly discovered calpain

10 play a role in meat tenderization during post-mortem storage? Meat Sci. 66: 317-327.

Igo, J. L., J. C. Brooks, B. J. Johnson, J. Starkey, R. J. Rathmann, A. J. Garmyn, W. T. Nichols,

J. P. Hutsheson, and M. F. Miller. 2011. Characterization of estrogen-trenbolone acetate

implants on tenderness and consumer acceptability of beef under the effect of 2 aging

times. J. Ani. Sci. 89: 792-797.

Ji, J. R. and K. Takahashi. 2006. Changes in concentration of sarcoplasmic free calcium during

post-mortem ageing of meat. Meat Sci. 73:395-403.

Joseph, R. L., and J. Connolly. 1977. The effects of suspension method, chilling rates and post

mortem ageing period on beef quality. Int. J. Food Sci. & Tech. 12: 231-247.

Kendall, T. L., M. Koohmaraie, J. R. Arbona, S. E. Williams, and L. L. Young. 1993. Effect of

pH and ionic strength on bovine m-calpain and calpastatin activity. J. Ani. Sci. 71: 96-

104.

Kidwell, J. S., and B. Lynn Harrington. 1982. Ridge Regression as a Technique for Analyzing

Models with Multicollinearity. J. Marriage & Family 44: 287-299.

Knapp, B., and A. W. Nordskog. 1946. Heritability of growth and efficiency in beef cattle. J.

Ani. Sci. 5: 62-70.

Koch, R. M., M. E. Dikeman, and J. D. Crouse. 1982. Characterization of biological types of

cattle (cycle III).III. carcass composition, quality and palatability. J. Ani. Sci. 54: 35-45.

Koohmaraie, M., M. P. Kent, S. D. Shackelford, E. Veiseth, and T. L. Wheeler. 2002. Meat

tenderness and muscle growth: is there any relationship? Meat Sci. 62: 345-352.

Koohmaraie, M., S. C. Seideman, J. E. Schollmeyer, T. R. Dutson, and A. S. Babiker. 1988.

Factors associated with the tenderness of three bovine muscles. J. Food Sci. 53: 407-410.

Koohmaraie, M., S. D. Shackelford, N. E. Muggli-Cockett, and R. T. Stone. 1991a. Effect of the

beta-adrenergic agonist l644,969 on muscle frowth, endogenous proteinase activities, and

postmortem proteolysis in wether lambs. J. Ani. Sci. 69: 4823-4835.

Koohmaraie, M., G. Whipple, D. H. Kretchmar, J. D. Crouse, and H. J. Mersmann. 1991b.

Postmortem proteolysis in longissimus muscle from beef, lamb and pork carcasses. J.

Ani. Sci. 69: 617-624.

Kutner, M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, J. Neter, and W. Li. 2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models.

Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Lamare, M., R. G. Taylor, L. Farout, Y. Briand, and M. Briand. 2002. Changes in proteasome

activity during postmortem aging of bovine muscle. Meat Sci. 61: 199-204.

Page 39: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

33

Laville, E., T. Sayd, M. Morzel, S. Blinet, C. Chambon, J. Lepetit, G. Renand, and J. F.

Hocquette. 2009. Proteome changes during meat aging in tough and tender beef suggest

the importance of apoptosis and protein solubility for beef aging and tenderization. J.

Agri. & Food Chem. 57: 10755-10764.

Lawrence, T. L. J., V. R. Fowler, and J. E. Novakofski. 2012. Growth of Farm Animals. Third

ed. CAB International, Cambridge, MA.

Lawrie, R. A., and D. A. Ledward. 2006. Lawrie's Meat Sci.. Seventh ed. Woodhead Publishing

Limited, Boca Raton, FL.

Lee, S. H., S. T. Joo, and Y. C. Ryu. 2010. Skeletal muscle fiber type and myofibrillar proteins

in relation to meat quality. Meat Sci. 86: 166-170.

Lepetit, J. 2007. A theoretical approach of the relationships between collagen content, collagen

cross-links and ceat tenderness. Meat Sci. 76: 147-159.

Light, N., A. E. Champion, C. Voyle, and A. J. Bailey. 1985. The role of epimysial, perimysial

and endomysial collagen in determining texture in six bovine muscles. Meat Sci. 13: 137-

149.

Light, N., and A. E. Champion. 1984. Characterization of muscle epimysium, perimysium, and

endomysium collagens. Biochem. J. 219: 1017-1026.

Luckett, R. L., T. D. Bidner, E. A. Icaza, and J. W. Turner. 1975. Tenderness studies in

straightbred and crossbred steers. J. Ani. Sci. 40: 468-475.

Lunt, D. K., and L. E. Orme. 1987. Feedlot performance and carcass evaluation of heifers fed

finishing diets as weanling calves or as yearlings. Meat Sci. 20: 159-164.

MacNeil, M. D., D. R. Bailey, J. J. Urick, R. P. Gilbert, and W. L. Reynolds. 1991. Heritabilities

and genetic correlations for postweaning growth and feed intake of beef bulls and steers.

J. Ani. Sci. 69: 3183-3189.

Mandell, I. B., J. G. Buchanan-Smith, and C. P. Campbell. 1998. Effects of forage vs grain

feeding on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and beef quality in limousin-

cross steers when time on feed is controlled. J. Ani. Sci. 76: 2619-2630.

Mathews, K. H. and R. J. Johnson. 2013. Alternative beef production systems: issues and

implications. USDA-ERS LDPM-218-01.

Mellgren, R. L., R. D. Lane, and M. T. Mericle. 1989. The binding of large calpastatin to

biologic membranes is mediated in part by interaction of an amino terminal region with

acidic phospholipids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein. Structure and

Molecular Enzymology 999: 71-77.

Miller, M. F., H. R. Cross, J. D. Crouse, and T. G. Jenkins. 1987. Effect of feed energy intake on

collagen characteristics and muscle quality of mature cows. Meat Sci. 21: 287-294.

Meyer, D. L., M. S. Kerley, E. L. Walker, D. H. Keisler, V. L. Pierce, T. B. Schmidt, C. A. Stahl,

M. L. Linville, and E. P. Berg. 2005. Growth rate, body composition, and meat

tenderness in early vs. traditionally weaned beef calves. J. Ani. Sci. 83: 2752-2761.

Myers, S. E., D. B. Faulkner, F. A. Ireland, and D. F. Parrett. 1999. Comparison of three

weaning ages on cow-calf performance and steer carcass traits. J. Ani. Sci. 77: 323-329.

O'Connor, S. F., J. D. Tatum, D. M. Wulf, R. D. Green, and G. C. Smith. 1997. Genetic effects

on beef tenderness in Bos indicus composite and Bos taurus cattle. J. Ani. Sci. 75: 1822-

1830.

Oltjen, R. R., T. S. Rumsey, and P. A. Putnam. 1971. All-forage diets for finishing beef cattle. J.

Ani. Sci. 32: 327-333.

Page 40: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

34

Ott, R. L., and M. Longnecker. 2001. An introduciton to statistical methods and data analysis,

fifth edition. Duxbury Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA.

Ouali, A. 1990. Meat tenderization: possible causes and mechanisms. a review. J. Muscle Foods

1: 129-165.

Parr, T., R. G. Bardsley, R. S. Gilmour, and P. J. Buttery. 1992. Changes in calpain and

calpastatin mRNA induced by β-adrenergic stimulation of bovine skeletal muscle. E. J.

Biochem. 208: 333-339.

Pringle, T. D., S. E. Williams, B. S. Lamb, D. D. Johnson, and R. L. West. 1997. Carcass

characteristics, the calpain proteinase system, and aged tenderness of Angus and

Brahman crossbred steers. J. Ani. Sci. 75: 2955-2961.

Purchas, R. W., X. Yan, and D. G. Hartley. 1999. The influence of a period of ageing on the

relationship between ultimate ph and shear values of beef m. longissimus thoracis. Meat

Sci. 51: 135-141.

Platter, W. J., J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, P. L. Chapman, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith. 2003.

Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to

consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks. J. Ani. Sci. 81: 2741-2750.

Purslow, P. P. 2005. Intramuscular connective tissue and its role in meat quality. Meat Sci. 70:

435-447.

Quigley, J. D., Z. P. Smith, and R. N. Heitmann. 1991. Changes in plasma volatile fatty acids in

response to weaning and feed intake in young calves. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 258-263.

Ramsey, C. B., J. W. Cole, B. H. Meyer, and R. S. Temple. 1963. Effects of Type and Breed of

British, Zebu and Dairy Cattle on Production, Palatability and Composition. II.

Palatability Differences and Cooking Losses as Determined by Laboratory and Family

Panels. J. Ani. Sci. 22: 1001-1008.

Riley, D. G., C. C. Chase, T. D. Pringle, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, T. A. Olson, A. C.

Hammond, S. W. Coleman. 2003. Effect of sire on μ- and m-calpain activity and rate of

tenderization as indicated by myofibril fragmentation indices of steaks from Brahman

cattle. J. Ani. Sci. 81: 2440-2447.

Rowe, L. J., K. R. Maddock, S. M. Lonergan, and E. Huff-Lonergan. 2004. Oxidative

environments decrease tenderization of beef steaks through inactivation of μ-calpain. J.

Ani. Sci. 82: 3254-3266.

Rowe, R. W. D. 1981. Morphology of perimysial and endomysial connective tissue in skeletal

muscle. Tissue & Cell 13: 681-690.

Sainz, R. D., and R. F. Vernazza Paganini. 2004. Effects of different grazing and feeding periods

on performance and carcass traits of beef steers. J. Ani. Sci. 82: 292-297.

Savell, J. W., H. R. Cross, and G. C. Smith. 1986. Percentage ether extractable fat and moisture

content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. J. Food Sci. 51:

838-839.

Schagger, H. 2006. Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nature. Protocols 1: 16-22.

Seideman, S. C., M. Koohmaraie, and J. D. Crouse. 1987. Factors associated with tenderness in

young beef. Meat Sci. 20: 281-291.

Shackelford, S. D., M. Koohmaraie, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, G. A. Rohrer, and J. W.

Savell.1994a. Heritabilities and phenotypic and genetic correlations for bovine postrigor

calpastatin activity, intramuscular fat content, Warner-Bratzler shear force, retail product

yield, and growth rate. J. Ani. Sci. 72: 857-863.

Page 41: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

35

Shackelford, S. D., M. Koohmaraie, and J. W. Savell. 1994b. Evaluation of longissimus dorsi

muscle ph at three hours post mortem as a predictor of beef tenderness. Meat Sci. 37:

195-204.

Short, R. E., E. E. Grings, M. D. MacNeil, R. K. Heitschmidt, C. B. Williams, and G. L. Bennett.

1999. Effects of sire growth potential, growing-finishing strategy, and time on feed on

performance, composition, and efficiency of steers. J. Ani. Sci. 77: 2406-2417.

Smith, T., J. D. Domingue, J. C. Paschal, D. E. Franke, T. D. Bidner, and G. Whipple. 2007.

Genetic parameters for growth and carcass traits of Brahman steers. J. Ani. Sci. 85: 1377-

1384.

Smulders, F. J. M., B. B. Marsh, D. R. Swartz, R. L. Russell, and M. E. Hoenecke. 1990. Beef

tenderness and sarcomere length. Meat Sci. 28: 349-363.

Switzer, R., and L. Garrity. 1999. Experimental biochemistry, theory and exercises in

fundamental methods, fifth edition. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.

Tatum, J. D., G. C. Smith, B. W. Berry, C. E. Murphey, F. L. Williams, and Z. L. Carpenter.

1980. Carcass characteristics, time on feed and cooked beef palatability attributes. J. Ani.

Sci. 50: 833-840.

Taylor, R. G., G. H. Geesink, V. F. Thompson, M. Koohmaraie, and D. E. Goll. 1995. Is Z-disk

degradation responsible for postmortem tenderization? J. Ani. Sci. 73: 1351-1367.

Therkildsen, M., L. M. Larsen, H. G. Bang, and M. Vestergaard. 2002a. Effect of growth rate on

tenderness development and final tenderness of meat from friesian calves. Ani. Sci. 74:

253-264.

Therkildsen, M., L. Melchior Larsen, and M. Vestergaard. 2002b. Influence of growth rate and

muscle type on muscle fibre type characteristic, protein synthesis capacity, and activity of

the calpain system in friesian calves. Ani. Sci. 74: 243-251.

Tuma, H. J., J. H. Venable, P. R. Wuthier, and R. L. Henrickson. 1962. Relationship of fiber

diameter to tenderness and meatiness as influenced by bovine age. J. Ani. Sci. 21: 33-36.

USDA-AMS. 2011. Nolan Ryan's All Natural Guaranteed Tender Beef. In: USDA-AMS,

Washington, D.C.

USDA-AMS. 2012. USDA Beef Tenderness Marketing Claim Standard. In: USDA-AMS,

Washington, D.C.

Van Koevering, M. T., D. R. Gill, F. N. Owens, H. G. Dolezal, and C. A. Strasia. 1995. Effect of

time on feed on performance of feedlot steers, carcass characteristics, and tenderness and

composition of longissimus muscles. J. Ani. Sci. 73: 21-28.

Vasconcelos, J. T., and M. L. Galyean. 2007. Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting

nutritionists: The 2007 Texas Tech University survey. J. Ani. Sci.. 85:2772-2781.

Voges, K. L. C. L. Mason, J. C. Brooks, R. J. Delmore, D. B. Griffin, D. S. Hale, W. R.

Henning, D. D. Johnson, C. L. Lorenzen, R. J. Maddock, R. K. Miller, J. B. Morgan, B.

E. Baird, B. L. Gwartney, J. W. Savell. 2007. National Beef Tenderness Survey – 2006:

Assessment of Warner–Bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from us retail

and foodservice establishments. Meat Sci. 77: 357-364.

Wheeler, T. L., S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie. 1999. Tenderness classification of beef:

IV. Effect of USDA quality grade on the palatability of "tender" beef longissimus when

cooked well done. J. Ani. Sci. 77: 882-888.

Wheeler, T. L., L. V. Cundiff, and R. M. Koch. 1994. Effect of marbling degree on beef

palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. J. Ani. Sci. 72: 3145-3151.

Page 42: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

36

Whipple, G., M. Koohmaraie, M. E. Dikeman, and J. D. Crouse. 1990. Predicting beef-

longissimus tenderness from various biochemical and histological muscle traits. J. Ani.

Sci. 68: 4193-4199.

Wulf, D. M., R. S. Emnett, J. M. Leheska, and S. J. Moeller. 2002. Relationships among

glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability.

J. Ani. Sci. 80: 1895-1903.

Wulf, D. M., J. B. Morgan, J. D. Tatum, and G. C. Smith. 1996. Effects of animal age, marbling

score, calpastatin activity, subprimal cut, calcium injection, and degree of doneness on

the palatability of steaks from limousin steers. J. Ani. Sci. 74: 569-576.

Zinn, D. W., R. M. Durham, and H. B. Hedrick. 1970a. Feedlot and carcass grade characteristics

of steers and heifers as influenced by days on feed. J. Ani. Sci. 31: 302-306.

Zinn, D. W., C. T. Gaskins, G. L. Gann, and H. B. Hedrick. 1970b. Beef muscle tenderness as

influenced by days on feed, sex, maturity and anatomical location. J. Ani. Sci. 31: 307-

309.

Page 43: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

37

Figure 1. A diagram of the structure and protein location of a muscle cell. One sarcomere is

represented as the distance from Z-disk to the adjacent Z-disk. This figure was adapted from

Taylor et al. (1995).

Page 44: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

38

Chapter 2

Characterizing the effect of average daily gain and carcass

parameters on shear force in finishing steers

Abstract The objectives of this study were to characterize the effects of rate of gain on WBSF in

finishing steers, characterize the effects of rate of gain on postmortem proteolysis, and to develop

a prediction equation using measured carcass traits to identify carcasses with a greater

probability of meeting consumer expectations for tenderness. Steers (N = 36, initial BW = 271 ±

24 kg) were stratified by weight into 6 pens of 6 steers (2 pens per treatment). Steers were limit

fed an common basal diet to target 3 rates of gain (1.0, 1.5, and 1.85 kg/d). Steers were weighed

every 14 d week throughout the study period to adjust feed amount, using the NRC equation for

NEg, based on pen mean BW. At study d 151, the 2 heaviest steers from each pen were

slaughtered. The middle two steer were slaughtered on d 161 with the remaining steers

slaughtered on d 167. Warner-Bratzler shear force was determined at 6 aging points (1, 7, 14,

21, 28, and 35 d postmortem). Samples for collagen content, sarcomere length, and western

blotting were obtained at 1 d postmortem. Steer served as the experimental unit for each

dependent variable. Dependent variables were used in multiple linear regression models to

predict loin muscle (LM) WBSF at the aging points of 1, 21, and 35 d postmortem. Dependent

variables included: ADG, stun to chill time interval, LM ultimate pH (UPH), extractable lipid

percentage, fat thickness (FT), lean maturity, skeletal maturity, loin LM area, LM sarcomere

length, LM soluble collagen, LM insoluble collagen, weaning age, birth weight, LM postmortem

temperature at 2, 4, and 8 hrs, and corresponding cook loss percentage for the aging point.

Troponin T and desmin degradation were analyzed on 15 samples (5 steers with the greatest

growth rate, 5 steers closest to the mean growth rate, and 5 steers with the slowest growth rate) at

Page 45: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

39

1 and 21 d postmortem. Average daily gain accounted for 36% of the variation in WBSF at 1 d

postmortem (1 d WBSF = 6.38 – (1.42*ADG, kg/d)); however, ADG was not significant at any

other aging point. For prediction of 1 d WBSF using all parameters, a 4 variable equation was

calculated (1 d WBSF = -25.28 + (4.30 * UPH) – (0.29 * extractable lipid, %) + (0.03 * skeletal

maturity) + (0.20 * 1 d cook loss, %), Adj. R2 = 0.72). Whereas, prediction of 21 d WBSF used

a 2 variable model (21 d WBSF = 0.39 + (0.10 * 21 d cook loss, %) + (0.09 * extractable lipid,

%) Adj. R2 = 0.47). Disappearance of the 37 kDa troponin T band accounted for 27% of the

variation in WBSF at 21 d postmortem. Steers were stratified by feedlot ADG into 3 treatment

groups 1.01, 1.50, and 1.96 with mean ADG and standard deviations of 1.01 ± 0.18, 1.50 ± 0.14,

and 1.96 ± 0.09 kg/d, respectively. Treatment group 1 had greater WBSF values (P < 0.05) as

compared with 1.50 and 1.96 at 1 d postmortem. Treatment groups did not differ (P > 0.17) at

any other postmortem aging point. In conclusion, ADG is not the only factor affecting 1 d

WBSF. Also, average daily gain was not able to account for any variation in WBSF at aging

points after 1 d postmortem.

Introduction Palatability of beef is based on consumers’ perception of flavor, juiciness, and tenderness

(Voges et al., 2007). Other research reported tenderness as being the most important trait

associated with consumer satisfaction (Shackelford et al., 2001). Boleman et al. (1997) reported

consumers are willing to pay premiums for beef cuts labeled with a tenderness guarantee. The

United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA-AMS) has

proposed tenderness grades for beef to standardize tenderness labeling (USDA-AMS, 2012).

These developments justify a need to classify cattle based on predicted tenderness values.

Page 46: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

40

The effect of growth rate on Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) is inconsistent.

Correlations have shown that as average daily gain (ADG) increases, 7 d WBSF decreased

(Shackelford et al., 1994; Smith et al., 2007). In support, others have reported decreased WBSF

in faster growing cattle as compared with slower growing cattle (Aberle et al., 1981; Therkildsen

et al., 2002a, b). However, others have not observed an effect of ADG on WBSF (Burson et al.,

1980; Fishell et al., 1985). Oddy et al. (2001) reported that growth rate has an impact on

collagen crosslinking and proteolytic activity. Other studies have reported that meat tenderness

is determined by sarcomere length and the amount and solubility of collagen (Koohmaraie and

Geesink, 2006). Average daily gain was correlated with calpastatin activity: as ADG increased,

calpastatin activity decreased (Shackelford et al., 1994). Furthermore, an increase in the activity

of calcium dependent protease inhibitors caused decrease postmortem tenderization and an

increase WBSF (Whipple et al., 1990; Shackelford et al., 1994). Increasing ADG could increase

protein turnover by decreasing calpastatin activity and increase postmortem tenderization. Many

researchers have reported ultimate pH (UPH) affecting tenderness (Purchas et al., 1999; Wulf et

al., 2002). However, other studies report the combined effects of pH decline and chill rate have

an impact on tenderness (Hannula and Puolanne, 2004; Hwang and Thompson, 2001). In

addition, multiple postmortem factors may also affect postmortem tenderization; therefore, we

hypothesize that steers with greater ADG will be more tender as compared with cattle with

reduced ADG.

Materials and Methods Steers used during this study were cared for in compliance with the regulations and

guidelines from the University of Illinois Animal Care and Use Committee. Steers were

slaughtered under federal inspection at the University of Illinois Meat Sci. Laboratory.

Page 47: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

41

Experimental Design

Thirty-six Angus crossbred steers were obtained from the University of Illinois internal

herd located in Dixon Springs, Illinois. Steers (initial BW=271±24.0 kg) were stratified by

weight and placed into pens of six steers per pen with two pens per treatment for a total of 12

steers/treatment. Data from four steers were excluded from the data set due to the discovery of

testicles during slaughter (two steers from the slow treatment and two from the medium

treatment). Steers were acclimated to pens for approximately four weeks, while dietary

concentrate inclusion was increased to dietary treatment level. Steers were limit fed to target

three different rates of gain (slow, ADG of 1.0 kg/d; medium, ADG of 1.5 kg/d; and fast, ADG

of 1.85 kg/d). Lifetime average daily gain (LTADG) was defined as gain from birth to slaughter

divided by d of age at slaughter. Feedlot average daily gain (FADG) was calculated as gain

during study period divided by d of study period. The study was divided into two parts. In part

one, individual steer (n = 32) served as the experimental unit for determination of predication

equations. In part two, steers were stratified by FADG and grouped into three FADG treatments

1.01 (n = 11), 1.50 (n = 11), and 1.96 (n = 10) with mean ADG and standard deviations of 1.01 ±

0.18, 1.50 ± 0.14, and 1.96 ± 0.09 kg/d, respectively, and individual steer served as the

experimental unit. After 151 days on feed, the two heaviest animals from each pen were

transported to the University of Illinois Meat Sci. Laboratory for slaughter. The next two

heaviest steers in each pen were slaughtered after 161 d on feed with the remaining steers

slaughtered after 167 d on feed. Hot carcass weight (HCW) and time from stunning to initiation

of chill were recoreded.

Diets

Steers were fed diets to meet or exceed NRC requirements. Diets contained (on a DM

basis) 20% corn husklage, 15% dry distillers grain with solubles, 55% cracked corn, and 10%

Page 48: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

42

vitamin/mineral supplement containing monensin (Rumensin; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield,

IN) and tylosin phosphate (Tylan; Elanco Animal Health; Table 1). Diets were limit fed to

achieve 3 different rates of gain. Steers were individually weighed every two weeks and feed

amount was adjusted based on the mean pen weight using NRC (1996) prediction equations for

medium-framed steers to maintain rates of gain.

Chill Rate and Ultimate pH

Carcass chill rate was recorded using temperature recorders (Multitrip, Sensitech, Inc,

Beverly, MA) placed in the center of the longissimus muscle (LM) between the first and second

lumbar vertebra starting at approximately 1.25 hrs postmortem. Temperature measurements

were recorded every 10 min for 23 h after the carcass was placed in cooler. Longissimus muscle

temperature was reported at 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 23 hrs postmortem. Ultimate pH of the LM was

measured using a handheld pH meter (pH-star, R. Matthaus, Klausa, Thuringen, Germany) at the

13th rib prior to carcass grading.

Carcass Grading

Carcasses were chilled for approximately 24 hrs prior to grading. Carcasses were ribbed

between the 12th and 13th rib and the ribeye face was allowed to bloom for approximately 20 min

prior to evaluation. Fat thickness was measured at 75% of the distance around the ribeye face

from the spinal dorsal processes. Kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH) was evaluated and

reported as a percentage of HCW. Ribeye area (REA) was determined by tracing the ribeye face

on Dura-Lar film (Grafix, Maple Heights, OH). Traced area was measured in duplicate using a

digitizing tablet (Wacom Co., Ltd; Vancouver, WA). Ribeye area was reported as the average of

the duplicates. Marbling and maturity were evaluated according to the USDA grading standards

(USDA-AMS, 1996).

Page 49: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

43

Sample Collection

The right side of each carcass was fabricated following the completion of carcass

grading. Each strip loin was faced prior to being sliced into steaks. The face cut was used for

proximate analysis (lipid and moisture percentage). Aging curves were determined using 6

steaks, 2.54 cm thick, from the rib end of the strip loin (NAMP #180 PSO 4) and randomly

assigned to 1 of 6 aging points (1, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 35 d). Protein degradation samples were

obtained by dividing the seventh steak into 6 sections. Each section was randomly assigned to 1

of the 6 aging points. Aging curve steaks and protein degradation samples were vacuum

packaged and stored at 1°C until assigned aging point. Aging curve steaks and protein

degradation samples were frozen at the completion of aging and stored at -20°C until further

analysis. The eighth steak from the strip loin was used for sarcomere length and collagen

content (soluble and insoluble) determination.

Moisture and Lipid Determination

Steaks were trimmed of subcutaneous fat and homogenized in a food processor (Cuisinart

model CUI DFP-7BC, Cuisinart, East Windsor, NJ) prior to analysis. Proximate composition

was determined as described by Novakofski et al. (1989) in which duplicate 10 g samples were

weighed and dried at 110 °C for 24 hrs to determine moisture content. Dried samples were then

subjected to lipid extraction using an azeotropic mixture of chloroform and methanol.

Warner-Bratzler Shear Force

Steaks were placed in a cooler at 1°C to thaw for 24 hrs. Steaks were trimmed of

excess subcutaneous fat and weighed to determine raw weight. Steaks were cooked on a

Faberware Open Hearth Grill (Model 455N, Walter Kidde, Bronx, NY) until an internal

temperature of 70°C was reached. Internal temperature was monitored using a Digi Sense 12

Channel Scanning Benchtop Thermometer (Model 92000-00, Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL).

Page 50: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

44

Steaks were then allowed to cool to approximately 25°C. After cooling, steaks were weighed to

determine cooked weight. Raw and cooked weights were used to calculate percentage cook loss.

Six 1.25 cm cores, parallel to the muscle fibers, were removed from each steak. Cores were

sheared using a Warner-Bratzler attachment with a blade speed of 3.33 mm/sec on a Texture

Analyzer TA HD Plus (Texture Technologies Corp., Scarsdale, NY / Stable Microsystems,

Godalming, UK). The peak shear force value for each of the 6 cores was averaged and reported.

Western Blotting

Sample Selection

Steers were ranked based on individual FADG. The 5 steers with the greatest ADG were

selected for western blotting, along with the 5 steers with the least ADG and the 5 steers closest

to the mean for ADG. Samples from selected steers were analyzed for troponin T and desmin

degradation at 1 and 21 d postmortem.

Whole Muscle Sample Preparation

Samples were prepared using a modified version of the method described by Huff-

Lonergan et al. (1996). Samples were powdered using liquid nitrogen and 100 mg of sample was

weighed into a 2.0 ml microfuge tube. Then, 1.5 ml of whole muscle buffer containing 2%

(wt/vol) SDS and 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was added to each sample tube. The

samples were tissuelyzed at 30 Hz for 90 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 1,500 * g. Protein

concentration of the supernatant was quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Protein

Research Products, Rockford, IL). Samples were diluted to a final concentration of 4 mg/ml

with 0.50 ml of Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), 0.1 ml beta-

mercaptoethanol, and whole muscle buffer. Samples were then heated for 20 min at 50°C.

Page 51: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

45

Gel Electrophoresis

Seven microliters (28 µg of protein) of each sample were loaded into either 10%

polyacrylamide gels for desmin or 4 to 20% polyacrylamide gradiant gels for troponin T (Mini-

Protean TGX gel, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Gels were electrophoresed in a running

buffer containing 2 mM EDTA, 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 1% (wt/vol) SDS for

approximately 90 min at a constant voltage of 90 v. After electrophoresis, gels were transferred

to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes at 0°C for 90 min at a constant voltage of 90 v in

transfer buffer consisting of 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 15% methanol (vol/vol).

Blotting

Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were blocked for 60 min using 0.5% (wt/vol) non-

fat dry milk in PBS Tween. Membranes were incubated either with monoclonal mouse anti-

troponin T (JLT-12, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or monoclonal mouse anti-desmin (DE-U-

10, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a 1:5,000 dilution in PBS Tween at 4°C overnight.

Membranes were washed with PBS Tween 3 times (10 min per wash). Membranes were then

incubated with polyclonal anti-mouse peroxidase antibody (A9044, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,

MO) at a dilution of 1:50,000 for 60 min at 25°C. Membranes were washed 3 more times (10

min per wash) in PBS Tween. Bands were detected using SuperSignal West Pico

Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Band density was quantified by

densitometry using a ChemiDoc-It 2 Imager (UVP, Upland, CA). Troponin T degradation was

measured by the disappearance of both the 37 and 39 kDa bands (Figure 2) and desmin

degradation was measured by the disappearance of the 56 kDa band (Figure 3). Troponin T and

desmin degradation were reported as ratios to the corresponding band in the reference sample (1

day postmortem beef LM).

Page 52: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

46

Sarcomere Length Determination

Sarcomere length was determined on raw steak samples from the LM using helium neon

laser diffraction as described by Cross et al. (1981). Samples were fixed using the method

described by Koolmees et al. (1986); in which, samples are fixed in a solution containing 5%

glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at a pH of 7.2 and chilled at 4 °C for 4 hrs.

Samples were then washed in a 0.2 M sucrose solution containing 0.1 M sodium phosphate

buffer at a pH of 7.2. Samples remained at 4°C in the wash solution for a minimum of 18 h.

From each sample, 4 sub-samples were collected and placed on a glass microscope slide. From

each sub-sample, 5 sets of diffraction bands were traced on a sheet of paper (20 total

measurements per sample) using helium neon laser diffraction (Model 05-LHR-021, Melles

Griot, Carlsbad, CA). Sarcomere length was determined by the equation:

𝑆𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝜇𝑚) =632.8 × 10−3 ∗ 𝐷 ∗ √(

𝑇𝐷)

2

+ 1

2 ∗ 𝑇

where, D is the distance from the microscope slide to the paper (D was held constant a 100 mm)

and 2*T is the distance between the diffraction bands (Cross et al., 1981). The mean of the 20

sarcomere lengths was reported as the sarcomere length of the sample.

Collagen Content

Collagen content was determined by acid hydrolysis on a raw steak from the LM taken

posterior to the WBSF samples. Soluble and insoluble collagen were separated using a modified

version of the Hill (1966) procedure. Samples were powdered in liquid nitrogen and weighed in

duplicates into 50 ml polyethylene centrifuge tubes containing 16 mg of ¼ strength Ringer’s

solution. Samples were incubated in a water bath at 77°C for 70 min. Samples were then

centrifuged at 5200 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted from the centrifuge tube into a

Page 53: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

47

glass screw top test tube and labeled as soluble fraction. Acid hydrolysis was performed using

the procedure described by Cross et al. (1973), in which each fraction was heated at 110°C and 1

atm pressure in the presence of 6N HCl acid for a minimum of 6 h. Hydroxyproline content was

determined as described by Bergman and Loxley (1963); modified to use a 96 well micro plate

reader. After acid hydrolysis, samples were allowed to cool to room temperature and were

decolorized using 1 g of charcoal powder. The pH of both soluble and insoluble fractions was

adjusted to 6.0 and fractions were then volumized to either 250 ml for soluble and 500 ml for

insoluble. One ml of each sample was pipetted into a screw top test tube along with 2 ml of

isopropanol. One ml of the oxidant solution containing 7% (weight/volume) Chloramine T

dissolved in acetate/citrate buffer was pipetted into each tube. Four min after the oxidant

solution was added to each tube, 4 ml of Elrich’s reagent was added to each tube. Tubes were

then capped and placed in a water bath at 60°C for 25 min. After incubation, sample absorbance

was read at 558 nm in a 96 well micro plate reader. Collagen content was calculated as

𝑚𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑡 = (𝑚𝑔𝑚𝑙

𝑜𝑓 ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑜𝑥𝑦𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒) ∗ 𝑑 ∗ 𝑐

𝑤 ∗ 1000

where, d is the dilution factor, c is the constant (7.52 for soluble and 7.25 for insoluble), w is the

sample weight, and mg/ml of hydroxyproline is derived from the absorbance value of the micro

plate (Cross et al., 1973). Collagen content was reported as mg/g of meat tissue.

Statistical Analysis

In part one, individual steer (n = 32) served as the experimental unit for all dependent

variables. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated using PROC CORR in SAS (SAS

Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Correlations were considered significant at an alpha ≤ 0.05. Regression

functions were analyzed using PROC REG. The STEPWISE selection method, alpha = 0.15 for

Page 54: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

48

entry into model, Mallow’s Cp, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to select the

optimum prediction equations for WBSF at 1, 21, and 35 d postmortem. The STEPWISE

selection method was also used to evaluate proteolysis models at 1 and 21 d postmortem. The

VIF option was used to analyze for multicollinearity among the predictor variables. Excess

multicollinearity was indicated by VIF values greater than 10 and all prediction variables with

VIF > 10 were removed prior to STEPWISE selection. Influential points were identified using

DFFITS and DFBETAS. A point was considered influential if the DFFIT or DFBETA values

were greater than 1.

In part two, steers FADG treatments 1.01, 1.50, and 1.96 were analyzed using a one-way

ANOVA. Individual steer served as the experimental unit (n = 11 for 1.01 and 1.50 and n = 10

for 1.96). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC).

Feedlot average daily gain treatment served as the fixed effect in the model. Treatment means

were calculated using the LSMEANS option and separated using the PDIFF function.

Treatments were considered different at an alpha ≤ 0.05 and trending at an alpha between 0.1 and

0.05.

Results and Discussion

Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Population growth performance and carcass characteristic data are presented in Table 2.

The range in values for feedlot ADG and WBSF were 0.75 to 2.13 kg/d and 2.75 to 6.60 kg at 1

d postmortem, respectively. The range in ADG was dictated by the experimental design of this

study. The mean (± SD) HCW, LM area, KPH, fat thickness (FT), marbling score, lean

maturity, skeletal maturity, and overall maturity were 296 (± 44) kg, 74.4 (± 8.9) cm2, 1.76 (±

0.60)%, 0.60 (± 0.37) cm, 542 (± 92), 150 (± 11), 153 (± 11), 152 (± 8), respectively. In

Page 55: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

49

comparison to the population of cattle represented in the 2011 beef quality audit (Moore et al.,

2012), steers in this experiment had similar maturity scores, reduced HCW, LM area, KPH, and

FT, but greater marbling scores. Steers in this population were expected to have reduced HCW,

LM area, and FT because of the study design. Warner-Bratzler shear force values at 21 and 35

days postmortem were 2.87 (±0.52) kg and 2.73 (±0.50) kg, respectively (Table 3). Carcasses in

this study at 21 d postmortem had 0.24 kg greater WBSF as compared with the 22 d postmortem

WBSF reported by the 2013 National Beef Tenderness Survey (Guelker et al., 2013).

Laboratory Analysis

Population summary statistics for laboratory analyzed data are presented in Table 4.

Mean sarcomere length was 1.74 ± 0.14 µm with a minimum length of 1.31 µm and a maximum

of 2.00 µm. The mean and maximum sarcomere length are in agreement with other published

data (mean 1.77 ± 0.08 µm and maximum 2.01 µm) on sarcomere length of beef LM; however,

the minimum sarcomere length in this study is less than the minimum length (1.68 µm) reported

in other studies (Wheeler et al., 2002). The minimum sarcomere length of 1.30 µm is similar to

the sarcomere lengths reported in cold shortened longissimus steaks (King et al., 2002). The

shorter sarcomere lengths may indicate cold shortening of the sarcomeres in the LM. Total

collagen content was 4.45 mg/g fresh tissue with 11.84 % being soluble. Collagen content was

similar to other studies. Herring et al. (1967) reported similar values for total collagen content

(4.52 mg/g) in the LM of A maturity cattle; however, the percent soluble collagen (10.48 %) was

less. Other authors reported that concentrate finished Angus-cross steers had total collagen

content of 5.34 mg/g in LM with 10.92 % soluble (Duckett et al., 2007).

Variable Selection and Analysis of Influential Points

All measured and calculated variables (ADG, stun to chill interval, ending live weight,

HCW, KPH, marbling score, UPH, extractable lipid, FT, lean maturity, skeletal maturity, overall

Page 56: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

50

maturity, USDA yield grade, LM area, sarcomere length, soluble collagen, insoluble collagen,

total collagen, weaning age, birth weight, postmortem temperatures (2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 23 hrs),

and corresponding cook loss percentage for the aging point) were analyzed for multicollinearity.

Pearson correlation coefficients for carcass and growth measurements are presented in Table 5.

Collinearity was expected between ADG, HCW, and ending live weight since these variables are

highly correlated (r > 0.56; Reinhardt et al., 2012). Collinearity was also expected between total

collagen and soluble and insoluble collagen, because total collagen is the sum of soluble and

insoluble collagen (Table 6). Variables with variation inflation factors (VIF) values greater than

10 (ending live weight, HCW, KPH, marbling score, overall maturity, USDA yield grade, total

collagen, postmortem temperatures at 4, 12, and 18 hrs) were not used as candidate variables.

Seventeen remaining candidate variables were used in the prediction of tenderness at 1, 21, and

35 d postmortem. Using the DFBETA criterion, three steers in the slow rate of ADG treatment

were considered influential points based on DFBETA value for one day WBSF; therefore, data

for the steers were removed for 1 d WBSF analysis. For the WBSF prediction equation at 21 d,

the DFBETA value for UPH for a steer in the slow treatment group exceeded the criterion for an

influential point and the data were removed prior to analysis. No points were considered

influential in prediction of 35 d WBSF.

Pearson Correlation Coefficients and Shear Force Prediction Equations

Pearson correlation coefficients for growth and carcass parameters are presented in Table

5. Average daily gain was correlated with ending live weight (r = 0.87, P < 0.01) and HCW (r =

0.88, P < 0.01). Correlations between ADG and both ending live weight and HCW were

expected. Ending live weight and HCW are dependent on initial BW, ADG, and the number of

days cattle are on feed. Therefore, ADG will be correlated with ending live weight and HCW

Page 57: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

51

when cattle are similar in initial BW (271 ± 24 kg), slaughtered at an equal number days on feed,

and ADG is varied.

Correlations between ADG and laboratory analysis are presented in Table 6. Extractable

lipid and ADG were positively correlated (r = 0.75, P < 0.01). The correlation between

extractable lipid and ADG was expected, since the faster growing steers were slaughtered at a

typical finished weight. Studies have reported that as cattle approach mature weights (25%

empty body fat), protein mass increases at a decreasing rate; whereas, fat mass increases at an

increasing rate (Owens et al., 1995). Owens et al. (1995) also indicated that feed restriction in

cattle resulted in reduced fat mass. Because intramuscular fat depots develop lastly, studies

indicate that cattle would have a USDA quality grade of low Choice at 28% empty body fat (Fox

et al., 1992). Other studies also reported an increase from low select to low choice in USDA

quality grade between pasture finished (ADG 0.85 kg/d) and concentrate finished (ADG 1.23

kg/d) Angus-cross steers slaughtered at equal ages (Duckett et al., 2007; Neel et al., 2007). Other

authors reported an increase in USDA quality grade from low standard to low choice when

Herford x Angus cross steers harvested at equal ages were fed for an ADG of 0.34 kg/d

compared with steers fed for an ADG of 1.42 kg/d (Fishell et al., 1985). Average daily gain was

not correlated with percentage soluble collagen (r = -0.01, P = 0.97) or percentage insoluble

collagen (r = 0.01, P = 0.97) content. This finding is consistent with another study reporting no

difference in percentage soluble or percentage insoluble collagen in the LM between fast and

slow growing cattle (Duckett et al., 2007).

Correlations between predictor variables and 1, 21, and 35 d postmortem shear force are

reported in Table 7. Extractable lipid percentage and marbling score strongly correlated (r =

0.86, P < 0.01). Marbling score was moderately correlated with 1 d WBSF (r = -0.50, P < 0.01)

Page 58: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

52

and extractable lipid percentage (r = -0.54, P < 0.01). Shackelford et al. (1991) reported similar

correlations of -0.50 and -0.51 (P < 0.05) between WBSF and marbling score at 1 and 3 days

postmortem; however, no correlations (P > 0.05) between WBSF and marbling score were

reported at 7 or 14 d postmortem. Other studies have reported reduced correlations between

marbling score and 14 d WBSF (r < -0.33; Platter et al., 2003; Nelson et al., 2004). The

correlations between marbling score and early postmortem aging points indicated that marbling

score has an effect on WBSF only during early aging times. Average daily gain was correlated

with 1 d WBSF (r = -0.53, P < 0.01) along with FT (r = -0.58, P < 0.01) and LM area (r = -0.47,

P < 0.01). It is expected that if ADG is correlated with 1 d WBSF then, FT and LM should also

be correlated because faster growing cattle should have larger LM areas and greater FT when

slaughtered at equal ages. However, ADG was not correlated with WBSF at any other aging

point (P > 0.24). Other studies have reported no difference in WBSF in cattle with different

ADG (P > 0.05; Burson et al., 1980; Fishell et al., 1985). In contrast, other studies have reported

that ADG was correlated with 7 day WBSF (Shackelford et al., 1994; Smith et al., 2007). Aberle

et al. (1981) reported a 1.84 kg difference in WBSF for cattle with a growth rate of 0.70 and 1.34

kg/d. The conflicting effects of ADG on WBSF may indicate other factors are involved in

determining WBSF.

Prediction Models

An objective of the study was to characterize the effect of ADG on WBSF. As ADG

increased by 1 kg/d day, 1 d WBSF decreased (P < 0.01) by 1.42 kg/d (Adj R2 = 0.36; Figure 4).

However, other variables were able to account for more variation in the model using STEPWISE

selection. Two prediction models were calculated for each aging time point. The carcass

parameter model consisted of ADG, stun to chill time, UPH, extractable lipid, lean maturity,

bone maturity, LM area, weaning age, birth weight and, postmortem temperature at 2, 8, and 23

Page 59: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

53

hrs. The complete model used all candidate variables in the development of a tenderness

prediction model. The best carcass parameter model to predict 1 d WBSF was a 3 variable

equation (1 d WBSF = – 8 .10 – (0.97 * FT, cm) – (0.036 * LM area, cm2) + (2.87 * UPH) Adj.

R2 = 0.41). However, the best all-inclusive model equation accounted for 72 % of the variation

in 1 d WBSF (1 d WBSF = -25.28 + (4.30 * UPH) – (0.29 * extractable lipid, %) + (0.03 * bone

maturity) + (0.20 * 1 d cook loss, %), Adj. R2 = 0.72). Ultimate pH accounted for WBSF

variation in both models. The positive coefficient for UPH agrees with other studies reporting

that an increased UPH has been associated with increased WBSF (Purchas et al. 1999; Wulf et

al. 2002). The lack of collagen content or collagen solubility to account for variation in the

model is consistent with other studies reporting that collagen does not account for variation in

tenderness of youthful concentrate-fed cattle (Koohmaraie et al., 1995). Shackelford et al. (1991)

reported an R2 = 0.85 when using a five variable (cystatin activity at 24 hrs postmortem, calcium

dependent protease inhibitor at 24 hrs postmortem, calcium dependent protease II at 24 hrs

postmortem, internal LM temperature at 12 hrs postmortem, and pH at 9 hrs postmortem) to

predict 1 day WBSF. The proteolytic enzymes may have a greater effect on 1 d WBSF as

compared with carcass parameters. No significant carcass parameter model existed to predict 21

d WBSF (P > 0.15); therefore, the best complete model to predict 21 d WBSF used 2 variables

(21 d WBSF = 0.39 + (0.10 * 21 d cook loss, %) + (0.09 * extractable lipid, %) Adj. R2 = 0.47).

Stun to chill time accounted for 11 % of the variation in 35 d WBSF (35 d WBSF = 1.22 +

(0.020 * stun to chill time, min) Adj. R2 = 0.11). The effect of stun to chill time on 35 d WBSF

samples could be caused by increased protein denaturation due to delayed chilling.

Proteolysis

Population statistics for proteolysis ratios to reference values are presented in Table 8.

Correlations between 1 or 21 d WBSF and corresponding 37 kDa troponin T, 39 kDa troponin T,

Page 60: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

54

and 56 kDa desmin values are presented in Table 9. A significant correlation (r = 0.61) existed

between 39 kDa troponin T and 1 d WBSF indicating positive relation. Disappearance of the 39

kDa troponin T accounted for 31.4 % of the variation in 1 d WBSF (1 d WBSF = 1.14 + (4.61 *

39 kDa troponin T, ratio to reference) Adj. R2 = 0.31; Figure 5). The reduction in WBSF as the

amount of intact 39 kDa troponin T decreased (P = 0.02) is indicative of protein degradation

causing a change in WBSF. Degradation of troponin T has been reported to be strongly

correlated with beef tenderness (Montgomery et al., 2000). Koohmaraie (1996) reported that the

variation in tenderness of young grain fed cattle was due to the rate of postmortem proteolysis,

indicating that some cattle are considered tender by 1 d postmortem and others need a longer

aging period. Disappearance of the 37 kDa troponin T explained 26.8 % of the variation at 21 d

postmortem (21 d WBSF = 4.05 – (1.38*37 kDa troponin T, ratio to reference) Adj. R2 = 0.27)

(Figure 6). The negative coefficient was not expected because decrease ratio to reference values

for 37 kDa troponin T should be associated with decreased WBSF. No correlation was reported

(P > 0.5) between ADG and 37 kDa troponin T, 39 kDa troponin T, or desmin at either 1 or 21 d

postmortem (Table 10).

One-way ANOVA analysis

Carcass parameter least square means for feedlot average daily gain (FADG) treatments

are presented in Table 11. Ending live weight, HCW, marbling score, extractable lipid, and

USDA quality grade were the greatest in cattle fed to gain 1.96 kg/d. The greater weights and

quality grades were expected in the 1.96 kg/d treatment. Fishell et al. (1985) also reported faster

growing cattle had greater HCW, marbling score and USDA quality grades. Fat thickness, KPH,

and USDA yield grade did not differ (P ≥ 0.06) between 1.50 and 1.96; however, 1.01 had

reduced (P < 0.01) FT, KPH, and USDA yield grade as compared with 1.50 and 1.96. The

reduced FT and KPH were expected since 1.01 steers were the least finished of the treatment

Page 61: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

55

groups. Quality grade was expected to be lower in 1.01 since the steers had reduced fat

thickness and reduced KPH. Lean maturity color scores were greater (P = 0.02) in 1.01 as

compared with 1.50 and 1.96. Two steers in 1.01 were classified as dark cutters. The darker

lean maturity color score and dark cutters may indicate lower muscle glycogen stores. Ultimate

pH of 1.01 was trending (P = 0.07) to be greater as compared with 1.50 and 1.96. The increased

UPH supports the increased lean maturity color scores being caused by reduced glycogen stores.

Temperature decline data for the LM is presented in Figure 7. The longissmus temperature for

1.01 was less (P ≤ 0.01) than 1.50 and 1.96 at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 18 hours postmortem. At 23 h

postmortem, 1.01 was different (P < 0.01) from 1.96 and trended to be different (P = 0.06) from

1.50. The difference in temperature at each postmortem time point was likely caused by the

reduced FT, HCW, and LM area of 1.01.

Collagen content and sarcomere length data are presented in Table 12. Total collagen

content, percent soluble collagen, and percent insoluble collagen did not differ (P ≥ 0.29) among

treatments. Fishell et al. (1985) reported no difference in collagen content of the LM of cattle

grown at different rates of gain Sarcomere length did not differ (P = 0.13) among treatments.

Cook loss percentage is presented in Figure 8. Cook loss percentage was not different (P

≥ 0.18) at any postmortem aging point. Warner-Bratzler shear force data is presented in Figure

9. Warner-Bratzler shear force was greater (P = 0.05) for 1.01 as compared with 1.50 and 1.96

at the one day postmortem aging point. Warner-Bratzler shear force was not different (P ≥ 0.17)

at any other postmortem aging point. Fishell et al. (1985) also reported no difference in WBSF

at 7 days postmortem. Other studies reported that 1 d WBSF > 6.00 kg resulted in greater WBSF

at other postmortem aging points as compared with 1 d WBSF < 6.00 kg (Koohmaraie et al.,

Page 62: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

56

1995). This data supports the lack of difference at aging points past 1 d postmortem. Average

daily gain may only affect WBSF during postmortem aging times of less than 7 d.

Conclusion Further investigation should focus on the effects of ADG on biological processes that

regulate protein synthesis and protein degradation and the relations to early postmortem

tenderness. The results of this study demonstrate an effect of ADG on 1 d WBSF; however, only

36% of the variation was accounted for by ADG. Prediction of WBSF using measured carcass

parameters may allow for carcasses with the potential reduced WBSF to be identified and

segregated into tenderness classifications. For beef producers, being able to sort carcasses into

predicted tenderness categories could reduce the variation in tenderness in beef products. The

reduction in tenderness variation in beef products could increase consumer preference.

Page 63: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

57

Literature Cited

Aberle, E. D., E. S. Reeves, M. D. Judge, R. E. Hunsley, and T. W. Perry. 1981. Palatability and

muscle characteristics of cattle with controlled weight gain: time on a high energy diet. J.

Ani. Sci. 52: 757-763.

Bergman, I., and R. Loxley. 1963. Two improved and simplified methods for the

spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Analytical Chem. 35: 1961-1965.

Boleman, S. J., S. L. Boleman, R. K. Miller, J. F. Taylor, H. R. Cross, T. L. Wheeler, M.

Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, M. F. Miller, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, and J. W.

Savell. 1997. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Ani. Sci.

75: 1521-1524.

Burson, D. E., M. C. Hunt, D. M. Allen, C. L. Kastner, and D. H. Kropf. 1980. Diet energy

density and time on feed effects on beef longissimus muscle palatabiligy. J. Ani. Sci. 51:

875-881.

Cross, H. R., Z. L. Carpenter, and G. C. Smith. 1973. Effects of intramuscular collagen and

elastin on bovine muscle tenderness. J. Food Sci. 38: 998-1003.

Cross, H. R., R. L. West, and T. R. Dutson. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring

sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Sci. 5: 261-266.

Duckett, S. K., J. P. S. Neel, R. N. Sonon, Jr., J. P. Fontenot, W. M. Clapham, and G. Scaglia.

2007. Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: ii. ninth-tenth-

eleventh-rib composition, muscle color, and palatability. J. Ani. Sci. 85: 2691-2698.

Fishell, V. K., E. D. Aberle, M. D. Judge, and T. W. Perry. 1985. Palatability and muscle

properties of beef as influenced by preslaughter growth rate. J. Ani. Sci. 61: 151-157.

Fox, D. G., C. J. Sniffen, J. D. O’Connor, J. B. Russell, and P. J. Van Soest. 1992. A net

carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and

diet adequacy. J. Ani. Sci. 70: 3578-3596.

Guelker, M. R., A. N. Haneklaus, J. C. Brooks, C. C. Carr, R. J. Delmore, D. B. Griffin, D. S.

Hale, K. B. Harris, G. G. Mafi, D. D. Johnson, C. L. Lorenzen, R. J. Maddock, J. N.

Martin, R. K. Miller, C. R. Raines, D. L. VanOverbeke, L. L. Vedral, B. E. Wasser, and

J. W. Savell. 2013. National Beef Tenderness Survey–2010: Warner-Bratzler shear force

values and sensory panel ratings for beef steaks from united states retail and food service

establishments. J. Ani. Sci. 91: 1005-1014.

Hannula, T., E. Puolanne. 2004. The effect of cooling rate on beef tenderness: the significance of

ph at 7°C. Meat Sci. 67: 403-408.

Herring, H. K., R. G. Cassens, and E. J. Briskey. 1967. Factors affecting collagen solubility in

bovine muscles. J. Food Sci. 32: 534-538.

Hill, F. 1966. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J. Food

Sci. 31: 161-166.

Huff-Lonergan, E., T. Mitsuhashi, F. C. Parrish, and R. M. Robson. 1996. Sodium dodecyl

sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting comparisons of purified

myofibrils and whole muscle preparations for evaluating titin and nebulin in postmortem

bovine muscle. J. Ani. Sci. 74: 779-785.

King, D. A., T. L. Wheeler, M. Koohmaraie, M. E. Dikeman, and C. L. Kastner. 2002. Effects of

cold shortening and cooking rate on beef tenderness. In: Cattlemen's Day, Kansas State

University, Manhattan, KS. p 86-89.

Page 64: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

58

Koohmaraie, M., T. L. Wheeler, and S. D. Shackelford. 1995. Beef tenderness: Regulation and

prediciton. USDA-ARS U. S. Meat Animal Research Center. Clay Center, NE.

Koohmaraie, M. 1996. Biochemical factors regulating the toughening and tenderization

processes of meat. Meat Sci. 43: S193-S201.

Koohmaraie, M. G. H. Geesink. 2006. Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the

delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the caplain system. Meat Sci.

74: 34-43.

Koolmees, P. A., R. Korteknie, and F. J. M. Smulders. 1986. Accuracy and utility of sarcomere

length assessments by laser diffraction. Food Microstructure 5: 71-76.

Montgomery, J. L. F. C. Parrish, D. C. Beitz, R. L. Horst, E. J. Huff-Lonergan, and A. H.

Trenkle. 2000. The use of vtamin d3 to improve beef tenderness. J. Ani. Sci. 78: 2615-

2621.

Moore, M. C., G. D. Gray, D. S. Hale, C. R. Kerth, D. B. Griffin, J. W. Savell, C. R. Raines, K.

E. Belk, D. R. Woemer, J. D. Tatum, J. L. Igo, D. L. VanOverbeke, G. G. Mafi, T. E.

Lawrence, R. J. Delmore, L. M. Christensen, S. D. Shackelford, D. A. King, T. L.

Wheeler, L. R. Meadows, and M. E. O’Connor. 2012. National Beef Quality Audit–2011:

In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and

marketing of fed steers and heifers. J. Ani. Sci. 90: 5143-5151.

Neel, J. P. S., J. P. Fontenot, W. M. Clapham, S. K. Duckett, E. E. D. Felton, G. Scaglia, and W.

B. Bryan. 2007. Effects of winter stock growth rate and finishing system on: I. Animal

performance and carcass characteristics. J. Ani. Sci. 85: 2012-2018.

Nelson, J. L., H. G. Dolezal, F. K. Ray, and J. B. Morgan. 2004. Characterization of certified

angus beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck. J. Ani. Sci. 82: 1437-1444.

Novakofski, J., S. Park, P. J. Bechtel, and F. K. McKeith. 1989. Composition of cooked pork

chops: effect of removing subcutaneous fat before cooking. J. Food Sci. 54: 15-17.

Oddy, V. H., G. S. Harper, P. L. Greenwood, and M. B. McDonagh. 2001. Nutritional and

developmental effects on the intrinsic properties of muscles at they relate to the eating

quality of beef. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 41: 921-942.

Owens, F. N., D. R. Gill, D. S. Secrist, and S. W. Coleman. 1995. Review of some aspects of

growth and development of feedlot cattle. J. Ani. Sci. 73: 3152-3172.

Platter, W. J., J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, P. L. Chapman, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith. 2003.

Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to

consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks. J. Ani. Sci. 81: 2741-2750.

Purchas, R. W., X. Yan, and D. G. Hartley. 1999. The influence of a period of ageing on the

relationship between ultimate ph and shear values of beef m. longissimus thoracis. Meat

Sci. 51: 135-141.

Reinhardt, C. D., M. L. Hands, T. T. Marston, J. W. Waggoner, and L. R. Corah. 2012.

Relationships between feedlot health, average daily gain, and carcass traits of angus steer.

Pro. Ani. Sci. 28. 11-19.

Shackelford, S. D., M. Koohmarie, G. Whipple, T. L. Wheeler, M. F. Miller, J. D. Crouse, and J.

O. Reagan. 1991. Predictors of beef tenderness: development and verification. J. Food

Sci. 56: 1130-1135.

Shackelford, S. D., T. L. Wheeler, M. K. Meade, J. O. Reagan, B. L. Byrnes, and M.

Koohmaraie. 2001. Consumer impressions of tender select beef. J. Ani. Sci. 79: 2605-

2614.

Page 65: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

59

Therkildsen, M., L. M. Larsen, H. G. Bang, and M. Vestergaard. 2002a. Effect of growth rate on

tenderness development and final tenderness of meat from friesian calves. Ani. Sci. 74:

253-264.

Therkildsen, M., L. Melchior Larsen, and M. Vestergaard. 2002b. Influence of growth rate and

muscle type on muscle fibre type characteristic, protein synthesis capacity, and activity of

the calpain cystem in friesian calves. Ani. Sci. 74: 243-251.

USDA-AMS. 1996. Standards for grades of slaughter cattle and standards for grades of carcass

beef. In: A. M. S. United States Department of Agriculture.

USDA-AMS. 2012. USDA Beef Tenderness Marketing Claim Standard. In: USDA-AMS.

Voges, K. L., C. L. Mason, J. C. Brooks, R. J. Delmore, D. B. Griffin, D. S. Hale, W. R.

Henning, D. D. Johnson, C. L. Lorenzen, R. J. Maddock, R. K. Miller, J. B. Morgan, B.

E. Baird, B. L. Gwartney, and J. W. Savell. 007. National beef tenderness survey – 2006:

assessment of warner–bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from us retail and

foodservice establishments. Meat Sci. 77: 357-364.

Wheeler, T. L., S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie. 2002. Technical note: sampling

methodology for relating sarcomere length, collagen concentration, and the extent of

postmortem proteolysis to beef and pork longissimus tenderness. J. Ani. Sci. 80: 982-987.

Wulf, D. M., R. S. Emnett, J. M. Leheska, and S. J. Moeller. 2002. Relationships among

glycolytic potential, dark cutting (dark, firm, and dry) beef, and cooked beef palatability.

J. Ani. Sci. 80: 1895-1903.

Page 66: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

60

Table 1. Diet composition, fed during the finishing phase of the experiment.

Ingredient % of Diet, DM Basis

Cracked corn 55

Dry distillers grains with solubles 15

Corn husklage 20

Supplement

Ground corn 5.488

Limestone 2.689

Urea 1.614

Dairy TM salta 0.108

Fat 0.0718

Rumensin 90 0.0183

Tylan 40 0.0118

a Dairy trace mineral salt contains: 8.5% Ca (as CaCO3), 5% Mg (as MgO and MgSO4),

7.6% K (as KCl2), 6.7% Cl (as KCl2) 10% S (as S8, prilled), 0.5% Cu (as CuSO4 and

Availa-4 (Zinpro Performance Minerals; Zinpro Corp, Eden Prairie, MN)), 2% Fe (as

FeSO4), 3% Mn (as MnSO4 and Availa-4), 3% Zn (as ZnSO4 and Availa-4), 278 ppm

Co (as Availa-4), 250 ppm I (as Ca(IO3)2), 150 Se (Na2SeO3), 2,205 KIU/kg VitA (as

retinyl acetate), 662.5 KIU/kg VitD (as cholecalciferol), 22,047.5 IU/kg VitE (as DL-α-

tocopheryl acetate), and less than 1% CP, fat, crude fiber, salt.

Page 67: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

61

Table 2. Population summary statistics of growth performance and carcass

characteristics.

Item Mean Minimum Maximum

Standard

Deviation N

Growth Performance

Birth weight, kg 37.3 24.9 52.5 6.8 31

Weaning age, d 68.9 38 110 18.9 32

ADG life, kg/d 0.82 0.62 1.01 0.12 32

ADG feed yard, kg/d 1.48 0.75 2.13 0.42 32

Ending live weight, kg 483 384 576 62 32

Carcass Characteristics

Ultimate pH 5.48 5.36 5.73 0.09 32

Fat thickness, cm 0.60 .13 1.65 0.37 32

KPH, % 1.77 0.50 2.50 0.60 32

LM area, cm2 74.3 58.8 91.4 8.9 32

USDA yield grade 2.24 1.44 3.48 0.54 32

Marbling scorea 541 290 700 92.2 32

Extractable lipid, % 5.40 2.29 9.06 1.73 32

Bone maturityb 153 140 180 10.6 32

Lean maturityb 152 140 180 10.8 31

Overall maturityb 152 140 170 8.0 31

a200 = Practically devoid00, 300 = Traces00, 400 = Slight00, 500 = Small00, 600 =

Modest00, and Moderate = 70000

b100 = A00 and 200 = B00

Page 68: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

62

Table 3. Population summary statistics of Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and

cook loss data

Item Mean Minimum Maximum

Standard

Deviation N

WBSF

1 d postmortem, kg 4.35 2.75 6.60 1.00 32

7 d postmortem, kg 3.46 2.17 5.47 0.82 32

14 d postmortem, kg 3.33 2.28 5.38 0.67 32

21 d postmortem, kg 2.87 2.08 4.27 0.52 32

28 d postmortem, kg 2.84 2.02 4.64 0.59 32

35 d postmortem, kg 2.73 1.88 3.63 0.50 32

Cook lossa

1 d postmortem, % 18.14 11.86 25.86 3.26 32

7 d postmortem, % 19.15 12.27 27.24 3.70 32

14 d postmortem, % 19.70 12.30 27.70 3.73 32

21 d postmortem, % 19.63 11.96 27.07 3.56 32

28 d postmortem, % 20.53 10.99 30.88 4.64 32

35 d postmortem, % 17.65 10.25 26.36 3.99 32

a Cook loss calculated as: % cook loss = (raw weight - cook weight) / raw weight) * 100

Page 69: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

63

Table 4. Population summary statistics of temperature decline and laboratory analysis

Item Mean Minimum Maximum

Standard

Deviation N

Stun to chill time, min 76.1 58.0 99.0 9.43 32

Temperature Decline

2 hrs postmortem, °C 35.3 30.7 37.6 1.71 32

4 hrs postmortem, °C 24.9 19.5 27.9 2.43 32

8 hrs postmortem, °C 15.0 9.0 18.0 2.18 32

12 hrs postmortem, °C 10.4 6.4 12.9 1.68 32

18 hrs postmortem, °C 6.4 4.2 8.8 1.22 32

23 hrs postmortem, °C 4.6 2.7 6.8 1.07 32

Laboratory Analysis

Sarcomere length, µm 1.74 1.31 2.00 0.14 32

Soluble collagen, % 11.84 6.17 26.74 4.32 32

Insoluble collagen, % 88.16 73.26 93.83 4.32 32

Total collagena, mg/g 4.45 3.08 5.56 0.69 32

a Total collagen calculated as: total collagen = soluble collagen + insoluble collagen

Page 70: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

64

Table 5. Pearson correlation coefficients among growth performance and carcass characteristics

Item Live weight Hot carcass weight Fat thickness Kidney, pelvic, &

heart fat

Loin

muscle

area

USDA yield

grade

Average daily gain 0.87* 0.88* 0.55* 0.76* 0.78* 0.49*

Live weight

0.99* 0.60* 0.64* 0.85* 0.54*

Hot carcass weight

0.58* 0.63* 0.85* 0.54*

Fat thickness

0.57* 0.38* 0.89*

Kidney, pelvic, & heart fat

0.51* 0.60*

Loin muscle area

0.14

USDA yield grade

* indicates that the r is significant (P < 0.05)

Page 71: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

65

Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients between average daily gain and carcass

parameters and laboratory analysis

Item Average Daily Gain

Ultimate pH 0.30

Extractable Lipid 0.75*

Percent Insoluble collagen -0.01

Percent Soluble collagen 0.01

Total collagen -0.20

Sarcomere length -0.21

* indicates that the r is significant (P < 0.05)

Page 72: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

66

Table 7. Correlation coefficients among prediction variables and 1, 21, and 35 d

postmortem shear force

Warner-Bratzler Shear Force

Item 1 d postmortem 21 d postmortem 35 d postmortem

Birth Weight -0.14 -0.16 0.04

Weaning age 0.05 0.06 0.09

ADG feed yard -0.53* 0.16 0.08

Fat thickness -0.58* 0.23 0.09

LM area -0.47* 0.004 0.09

Extractable lipid -0.54* 0.21 0.04

Bone maturity -0.07 0.24 -0.12

Lean maturity 0.40 -0.12 -0.13

Stun to chill time 0.05 0.23 -0.06

2 hrs postmortem -0.44* 0.09 0.11

8 hrs postmortem -0.56* 0.04 -0.08

23 hrs postmortem -0.41* 0.21 0.25

Sarcomere length -0.07 -0.24 -0.21

Soluble collagen -0.02 -0.03 0.02

Insoluble collagen -0.13 -0.10 -0.05

Ultimate pH 0.40* -0.06 0.09

1 d postmortem cook loss 0.61*

21 d postmortem cook loss 0.65*

35 d postmortem cook loss

0.12

* indicates that the r is significant (P < 0.05)

Page 73: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

67

Table 8. Population summary statistics of proteolysis data

Item Mean Minimum Maximum

Standard

Deviation N

1 d Warner-Bratzler Shear

Force

37 kDa Troponin Ta 0.93 0.65 1.31 0.18 15

39 kDa Troponin Ta 0.73 0.56 1.00 0.14 14

56 kDa Desmina 0.96 0.27 1.35 0.26 14

21 d Warner-Bratzler Shear

Force

37 kDa Troponin Ta 0.83 0.58 1.13 0.18 15

39 kDa Troponin Ta 0.22 0.08 0.33 0.07 14

56 kDa Desmina 0.18 0.07 0.56 0.07 15

a Ratio to Reference

Page 74: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

68

Table 9. Correlation coefficients among proteolysis ratios and 1 or 21 d postmortem shear

force

Warner-Bratzler Shear Force

Item 1 d postmortem 21 d postmortem

37 kDa Troponin T -0.06 -0.57*

39 kDa Troponin T 0.61* 0.25

56 kDa Desmin 0.35 0.12

* indicates that the r is significant (P < 0.05)

Page 75: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

69

Table 10. Pearson correlation coefficients between average daily gain and

proteolysis ratio

Item Average Daily Gain

1 d Postmortem

37 kDa Troponin T 0.30

39 kDa Troponin T -0.37

56 kDa Desmin 0.18

21 d Postmortem

37 kDa Troponin T -0.44

39 kDa Troponin T -0.30

56 kDa Desmin 0.12

* indicates that the r is significant (P < 0.05)

Page 76: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

70

Table 11. Carcass parameter least square means for steers fed for different rates of gain.

Average daily gain, kg/d

Item 1.01 1.50 1.96 SEMw P-value

Ending live weight, kg 419a 493b 542c 12 < 0.01

Hot carcass weight, kg 252a 304b 338c 8 < 0.01

Dressing percentage, % 60.0a 61.5b 62.3b 0.5 < 0.01

Ultimate pH 5.52 5.43 5.49 0.03 0.07

Fat thickness, cm 0.31a 0.69b 0.83b 0.10 < 0.01

KPH, % 1.18a 1.91b 2.25b 0.13 < 0.01

LM area, cm2 67.9a 73.0a 83.3b 2.0 < 0.01

USDA yield grade 1.79a 2.49b 2.46b 0.14 < 0.01

Marbling scorex 459a 544b 631c 19 < 0.01

Extractable lipid, % 3.94a 5.45b 6.95c 0.39 < 0.01

Skeletal maturityy 147a 158b 154ab 3 0.05

Lean maturityy 157a 146b 146b 3 0.03

Overall maturityy 152 153 152 3 0.97

USDA quality gradez 4 5 6 < 0.01

a,b,c Means within a row of experimental treatment with different superscripts differ (P <

0.05).

w Pooled SE of treatment means; n= 10 to 11 steers/treatment. Because of unequal

numbers among treatments, the largest SE is reported.

x300 = Traces00, 400 = Slight00, 500 = Small00 and, 600 = Modest00,

y100 = A00 and 200 = B00

z 4 = select, 5 = low choice, 6 = average choice

Page 77: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

71

Table 12. Laboratory analyzed parameter least square means for steer fed for different rates

of gain

Average daily gain, kg/d

Item

1.01

1.50

1.96 SEM1

P-value

Soluble collagen1, % 12.4 11.2 11.9 1.4 0.83

Insoluble collagen2, % 87.6 88.8 88.1 1.4 0.83

Total collagen, mg/g 4.62 4.54 4.16 0.22 0.29

Sarcomere length, µm 1.76 1.78 1.66 0.04 0.13

a,b,c Means within a row of experimental treatment with different superscripts differ (P <

0.05).

1 Pooled SE of treatment means; n= 10 to 11 steers/treatment. Because of

unequal numbers among treatments, the largest SE is reported.

2 Expressed as a percentage of the total amount of collagen.

Page 78: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

72

Figure 2. Western blots of troponin T at 1 day postmortem (A) and 21 day postmortem (B). Lane MWS is the molecular weight

standard. Lane STD is the 1 day postmortem internal standard. The 39 kDa intact troponin T band decreased in all growth treatments

from 1 day to 21 days postmortem. The 30 kDa degradation band was not present at 1 day postmortem but was present at 21 days

postmortem.

Page 79: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

73

Figure 3. Western blots of desmin at 1 day postmortem (A) and 21 days postmortem (B). Lane MWS is the molecular weight

standard. Lane STD is the 1 day postmortem internal standard. The 56 kDa intact desmin band decreased as rate of gain increased.

The 38 kDa degradation band was not present at 1 day postmortem but was present at 21 days postmortem.

A B

Page 80: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

74

Figure 4. The effect of average daily gain on 1 d Warner-Bratzler shear force. Average daily

gain was able to account for 36% of the variation in 1 d Warner-Bratzler shear force. For every

kg/day increase in average daily gain, Warner-Bratzler shear force decreased by 1.42 kg. The

legend indicates the treatment pens of the steers.

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50

2

4

6

8Slow

Medium

Fast

0.01 P 0.36 R² Adj

6.38 1.42x - y

Average Daily Gain (kg/day)

Warner-BratzlerShear Force (kg)

Page 81: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

75

Figure 5. The effect of the 39 kDa troponin T ratio to reference value on 1 d Warner-Bratzler

shear force. Disappearance of the 39 kDa troponin T band accounted for 31% of the variation in

1 d Warner-Bratzler shear force. The legend indicates the treatment pens of the steers.

0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.20

2

4

6

8Slow

Medium

Fast

0.02 P 0.31 R² Adj

61.4 1.14x y

Ratio to Reference

Warner-BratzlerShear Force (kg)

Page 82: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

76

Figure 6. The effect of the 37 kDa troponin T ratio to reference value on 21 d Warner-Bratzler

shear force. Disappearance of the 37 kDa troponin T band accounted for 27% of the variation in

21 d Warner-Bratzler shear force. The legend indicates the treatment pens of the steers.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.51.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0Slow

Medium

Fast

0.03 P 0.27 R² Adj

05.438.1- y

x

Ratio to Reference

Warner-BratzlerShear Force (kg)

Page 83: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

77

Figure 7. Internal temperature of the longissmus lumborum during chilling. The internal

temperature of the longissmus was lower (P < 0.01) in the 1.01 kg/d treatment compared

with the 1.50 kg/d and 1.96 kg/d treatments at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 18 hour postmortem time

points. The internal temperature of the longissimus was higher (P < 0.01) in the 1.96

kg/d treatment as compared with the 1.01 kg/d at 23 hours postmortem. The legend

indicates the treatment ADG of the steers for the ANOVA analysis.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2 4 8 12 18 23

Internal

Temperature of

the Longissmus

(°C)

Time Postmortem (hours)

1.01 kg/d

1.50 kg/d

1.96 kg/d

*

*

*

*

**

Page 84: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

78

Figure 8. Cook loss percentage at each given aging point. Cook loss precentage among

treatments did not differ (P ≥ 0.18) at any given aging point. The legend indicates the

treatment ADG of the steers for the ANOVA analysis.

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 7 14 21 28 35

Cook loss

Percentage (%)

Aging Point (d)

1.01 kg/d

1.50 kg/d

1.96 kg/d

Page 85: CHARACTERIZING MEAT TENDERNESS OF FINISHING STEERS …

79

Figure 9. Warner-Bratzler shear force at each aging point. Warner-Bratzler shear force

was greater (P = 0.05) for the 1.01 kg/d treatment compared with the 1.50 and 1.96 kg/d

treatments at one day postmortem. Warner-Bratzler shear force did not differ (P > 0.17)

at any other aging point. The legend indicates the treatment ADG of the steers for the

ANOVA analysis.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

1 7 14 21 28 35

Warner-Bratzler

Shear Force (kg)

Aging Point (d)

1.01 kg/d

1.50 kg/d

1.96 kg/d

*