characterizing and verifying parameters for two new

20
Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New Mechanical Systems Through the Multiaxial Deformation of Automotive Sheet Metal Daevin Bhathal Hugh Mentors: Thomas Gnäupel-Herold Justin Milner SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 1 / 20

Upload: others

Post on 19-Apr-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New Mechanical Systems Through the Multiaxial Deformation

of Automotive Sheet Metal

Daevin Bhathal Hugh

Mentors: Thomas Gnäupel-HeroldJustin Milner

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 1 / 20

Page 2: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Motivation

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 2 / 20

(Courtesy of WorldAutoSteel)

Rising fuel economy standards

Classes and Properties of Automotive Sheet Metals

→ Methods for determining formability outcomes→ Need for mechanical properties of new metals→ Need for lighter vehicles

Page 3: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Neutron Diffraction Experiments

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 3 / 20

Distance Lattice Moves

+Lattice Geometric

Parameters +Modulus of

Elasticity

Stress

Neutron Diffraction

Strain

Formability Outcomes

Page 4: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

The Mechanical Systems

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 4 / 20

Octo-Strain In-Plane Shearing Device

▪ Capable of stressing a sample along eight directions in a single plane.

▪ Each arm can move independently of the other seven arms.

▪ Load cells on each arm used to measure force.

▪ Sample can be rotated 360o in-plane .

Arm

Load Cell

▪ Capable of shearing samples in-plane.

▪ Top clamp can hold the top of the sample stationary, in tension, or in compression.

▪ Bottom clamp can move in-plane horizontally.

▪ Sample can be rotated 90o in-plane.

Top Clamp

Bottom Clamp

Page 5: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Preparation of Samples

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 5 / 20

1. 2. 3.

Clean Sample

Apply White Coat

Spray Speckle Pattern

Page 6: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Digital Image Correlation Setup

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 6 / 20

Digital Image Correlation Setup

▪ Sample placed in mechanical system.

▪ Cameras positioned to provide an appropriate field of view of the sample.

▪ Lights rotated and positioned to provide even lighting.

Sample

Lights

Cameras

Page 7: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Basics of Digital Image Correlation

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 7 / 20

Typical Number of Subsets in One Image

Movement of a Subset During Tracking

(correlatedsolutions.com)

𝜀 =𝑙𝑓 − 𝑙𝑜

𝑙𝑜

1 2 3

Page 8: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Octo-Strain:Parameters Researched

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 8 / 20

Octo-Strain

Parameters:

▪ Strain Control• Allows more complex strain paths.• No user input required during testing.• More accurate than current control

methods.

▪ Testing Strain Paths

Page 9: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 9 / 20

Two Current Control Methods:▪ Force Control:

• Load cells read forces exerted on each arm.• Computer code changes speed of motors to approach the arm forces that the user

has defined.

▪ Displacement Control:• Computer code sets speed of motors based on user defined strain targets and rates.

Octo-Strain:Control Methods

New Control Method:▪ Strain Control:

• Digital Acquisition (DAQ) setup reads strain from Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system.• Code changes speed of motors based on comparing a user defined strain path to the DAQ strain

readings.

Page 10: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 10 / 20

Strain Control:Results

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12

ε yy

εxx

Equi-biaxial tests

Displacement Control

Force Control

Strain Control

All tests were run to be equi-biaxial.

Equi-biaxial means that at each point:εyy = εxx

%error = 𝜺𝒙𝒙−𝝐𝒚𝒚

𝜺𝒚𝒚* 100%

Strain control has lowest %error.

Page 11: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Maj

or

Stra

in

Minor Strain

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 11 / 20

Octo-Strain:Plane Strain Test Results

Failed

Plane Strain

Page 12: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Maj

or

Stra

in

Minor Strain

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 12 / 20

Octo-Strain:Equi-Biaxial Test Results

x-direction strain

y-direction strain

Page 13: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Maj

or

Stra

in

Minor Strain

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 13 / 20

Octo-Strain:Path Change Test Results

Pure DrawEqui-Biaxial

Page 14: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 14 / 20

Octo-Strain:Pure-Shear Test Results

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Maj

or

Stra

in

Minor Strain

Pure-Shear

Page 15: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 15 / 20

In-Plane Shearing Device

Parameters:

▪ Planar sample geometry with the most homogeneity in strain.

In-Plane Shearing Device:Parameters Researched

Page 16: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 16 / 20

In-Plane Shearing Device:Homogeneity in Strain Results

5mm high sample 9mm high sample

More PulloutLess Pullout

More Homogeneity Less Homogeneity

Page 17: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 17 / 20

In-Plane Shearing Device:Homogeneity in Strain Results

5mm high sample 5mm notched high sample

Less Homogeneity More Homogeneity

Page 18: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Summary of Results

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 18 / 20

▪ A new control method, strain control, has been developed.

• Advantages:o Complex strain paths can be defined easily in Excel.o No user input required during testing.o More accurate strain tests.

▪ Geometric parameters to achieve the highest homogeneity in strain for planar samples have been determined.• Smaller Height = Greater Homogeneity• Notches = Greater Homogeneity

Page 19: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Acknowledgements

Special Thanks To:

▪ Dr. Thomas Gnäupel-Herold

▪ Dr. Justin Milner

▪ Dr. Julie Borchers

▪ Dr. Joseph Dura

▪ NCNR Director Dr. Robert Dimeo

▪ NIST Center for Neutron Research

▪ Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering (CHRNS)

▪ SURF Program

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 19 / 20

Page 20: Characterizing and Verifying Parameters for Two New

Questions?

SURF 2016 Final Colloquium 20 / 20