characterization of mars’ scandia tholi...
TRANSCRIPT
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. ???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/,
Characterization of Mars’ Scandia Tholi moated1
domes: possible mud volcanism2
Edwin S. Kite,1,2
Niels Hovius,1
Jonathan Besserer3, John K. Hillier
1, Susan
J. Conway4, Adriano Mazzini
5, Talfan Barnie
6, and Stephane LeMouelic
3
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 2 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
* Correspondence author. Email: [email protected]
1Department of Earth Sciences,
Cambridge University, Cambridge, United
Kingdom.
2Earth and Planetary Science, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
3Laboratoire de Planetologie et
Geodynamique, Universite de Nantes,
Nantes, France.
4Open University, Milton Keynes, United
Kingdom.
5Physics of Geological Processes,
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
6Department of Geography, Cambridge
University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 3
Abstract. Large moated domes near the North Pole of Mars have been4
proposed as the source of the polar gypsum. We carried out a detailed study5
of the domes, showing that they have the following properties:- elliptical, with6
long axes oriented ∼ E-W; 430 ± 90 m high, with average diameter 38 km;7
combined area of 5.4 x 104 km2, and combined volume of 3.6 x 103 km3. The8
dome surfaces appear rough in MOLA and CTX data, with multiple pits and9
peaks. These sometimes define annular crests and slumps, concentric about10
a central peak. High resolution images show mantling and, rarely, boulder-11
rich layers. Azimuthally averaged radial profiles show mean slopes ∼ 1◦. The12
domes region has an excess of relatively steep, S-facing slopes, which is ab-13
sent in a control region mirrored through the pole. This may be related to14
summertime melting of ice-rich, N-facing slopes at high obliquity. Analysis15
of OMEGA and CRISM spectra shows pyroxene signatures, but no unam-16
biguous evidence for hydrated minerals at the optical surface of the domes.17
Explosive igneous volcanism, or mud volcanism, could account for these fea-18
tures. Uniform elevations, subdued relief, geologic context, and Earth analogs19
point to mud volcanism. In particular, large uplifts with jumbled interior to-20
pography and well-defined margins, resembling the domes, are found in the21
offshore S Barbados mud volcano province. On Mars, ice sheet emplacement22
or removal can generate overpressure and is a potential trigger for mud volcanism.23
These results favor the mud volcanism hypothesis of Tanaka [2005]. How-24
ever, it is not known whether gypsum sand could survive saltation over the25
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 4 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
distance (> 100 km) from the moated domes to the area of peak gypsum con-26
centration.27
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 5
1. Introduction
What lies beneath the northern plains of Mars? The basement of the northern depres-28
sion is Early Noachian in age [Frey, 2006], and much of the subsequent infill is compactible29
sediment [Buczkowski, 2007]. The topmost unit mapped from orbit, the Vastitas Borealis30
Formation, is thought to be periglacially reworked [Tanaka, 2005]. Phoenix has confirmed31
[Smith et al., 2009] the indication from GRS data [Boynton et al., 2002] that at least the32
topmost meter poleward of 60N is largely water-ice, probably deposited during ice ages33
≤ 5 Ma [Schorghofer, 2007]. Yet a central question remains unanswered [Tanaka et al.,34
2003]: What process was most significant in filling the basin? Possibilities include basaltic35
flood volcanism [Head & Kreslavsky, 2002], ocean sedimentation and catastrophic flood36
deposits [Fairen et al., 2003], debris flows [Tanaka et al., 2001], ash, impact ejecta, and37
aeolian processes. Near the center of the northern depression, a field of large, moated38
domes scars the otherwise smooth surface of the plains [Tanaka et al., 2008]. The dome39
field is 450 km from the Phoenix landing site at 68.2N, 125.7W (Figure 1). Because40
these moated domes (formally named Scandia Tholi) were formed of subsurface materials41
[Tanaka et al., 2003, 2005], they should hold clues to the nature of the basin fill. For42
example, a phreatomagmatic origin would suggest the presence of an aquifer at depth.43
This paper is the first to focus exclusively on the Scandia Tholi. However, the moated44
domes have previously been described and interpreted during broader mapping efforts: –45
Fishbaugh & Head [2000] interpret the moated domes, and the adjacent ridge-bounded46
depressions, as proglacial deposits formed during asymmetric retreat of Planum Boreum.47
Garvin et al. [2000] interpret the same features (which they termed Martian Pitted Domes,48
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 6 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
MPD) as igneous volcanos, an interpretation followed by Kneissl & Neukum [2008]. The49
lack of clearly-defined craters associated with the domes, together with their blocky, dis-50
rupted surfaces, led Skinner & Mazzini [2009] to propose that violent hydrothermal erup-51
tions (triggered by dyke or sill intrusions) formed the domes. Tanaka et al. [2003] was52
the first to suggest that the moated domes were the result of mud volcanism. This is also53
our preferred interpretation. Other hypotheses, particularly explosive igneous volcanism,54
cannot be ruled out. Throughout this paper, we define mud volcanism to be the spatially55
concentrated surface release of sediment, driven by overpressure associated with a fluid56
or vapor phase or phases. The release may be extrusive or explosive in character. This57
broad definition is designed to include stratified sediment mobilization processes, which58
are associated with mud volcanoes and thought to be driven by the intrusion of mud plugs59
at depth [Deville et al., 2006].60
The purpose of this paper is to give additional constraints on the nature and origin of61
the domes, as a step toward understanding the subsurface stratigraphy of the Northern62
Plains. We show that the domes have a distinctive, jumbled/blocky morphology that has63
not been found outside the northern plains, and identify key morphological characteris-64
tics: moats, central peaks with adjacent pits, disrupted ring structures, overall elliptical65
shape, and subdued relief. We also show that moats and nested, disrupted rings appear66
even in azimuthally-averaged radial profiles of the domes. We show that steep, N-facing67
slopes are underrepresented in the domes region. We suggest this is related to insolation-68
dependent modification. Spectral analysis shows that the optical surface at visible and69
near-infrared wavelengths is similar to that of the background plains, with absorptions70
characteristic of ferric oxide and pyroxene. Our assessment is that mud volcanism is the71
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 7
least unsatisfactory explanation of the domes. In particular, offshore mud volcanism in72
the Barbados Accretionary Prism and Gulf of Cadiz shows all of the structural elements73
we identify for the domes. We show that ice sheet emplacement can lead to near-surface74
overpressures sufficient to trigger mud volcanism. A summary of our evaluation is given75
in Table 2. Because mud volcanism is sourced from overpressured, deep-buried sediments,76
our work supports the inference that the Northern Plains stratigraphic column contains77
a significant percentage of sediments [Buczkowski, 2007].78
2. Description of moated dome field
The features of interest in this paper are rough-topped ovoid rises, with summits at79
least 100 m in elevation above surrounding topography, and which are not centered on80
a crater. Using Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) 256 pixels-per-degree (ppd) and81
512 ppd gridded topography, we have found 29 domes fitting this definition in the region82
72-80N, 180-215E (Table 1; Figure 2). This count is conservative; for example, dome83
12 may be a composite of five structures. Rises less than 10 km in size are not always84
well resolved by MOLA topography, so our catalogue probably excludes several rises that85
meet the definition, but which are too small for diagnostic features to be visible in the86
gridded topographic data. The amplitude of roughness on the dome tops exceeds that on87
the surrounding plains [Kreslavsky & Head, 2000] at 2.4 km scale and especially at 600 m88
scale, making the domes resemble welts. Welt-like features have only been found poleward89
of 70N on Mars, and Kneissl & Neukum [2008] have reported rare welt-like features in90
the 70-100E sector. The domes have a combined area of 5.4 x 104 km2. Referenced to91
the regionally detrended elevation of the Scandia plains, they have a combined volume92
of 3.6 x 103 km3. Some of the larger, more northerly domes have large central collapse93
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 8 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
cavities. Their morphology is transitional to that of two large ridge-bounded depressions94
(formally named Scandia Cavi) that lie adjacent to the domes (Figure 1). This suggests95
that the ridge-bounded depressions and the domes may have formed by the same process.96
The Scandia Cavi region also includes sinuous ridges, often terminating in craters, which97
we interpret to be either eskers, or (perhaps more likely) moraines. If this interpretation98
is correct, it would imply that the polar ice sheet was once more extensive in this sector99
- a history supported by the ice-rich composition of the Olympia Dome [Phillips et al.,100
2008], and the asymmetric distribution of the north polar plateau [Fishbaugh & Head,101
2000; Kite et al., 2009]. Near the limit of MOLA resolution, isolated to clustered conical102
rises are found occasionally within the moated domes region. These rises are especially103
concentrated near 76N, 103W, and have been interpreted as either erosional remnants of104
the formerly more extensive Rupes Tenuis plateau [Warner & Farmer, 2008], or volcanic105
edifices [Fagan & Sakimoto, 2009].106
To the east of 215E, the dome field is mantled by Scandia formation materials, and107
it is difficult to determine whether or not the domes were erosionally modified prior to108
this mantling. Outside of this area, dome outlines are less coherent, and their surfaces109
more pitted, in the north of the domefield. This implies that either: (1) the degree of110
exhumation increases to the N; (2) the more northerly domes were formed by a different111
mechanism than the southerly domes; or (3) that the degree of modification by ice varies112
across the study region. Incomplete preservation of the ring structures present in many the113
domes (Figure 2, Figure 4a) suggests that the domes have been erosionally modified. This114
indicates that the domes are composed of material that is susceptible to either sublimation115
or aeolian erosion. We can exclude glacial erosion, because there is little evidence for116
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 9
extensive wet-based glaciation in the north polar region. Periglacial modification can also117
be excluded as it tends to soften hillslopes, but not reduce base level.118
The Scandia Tholi overly the Interior Unit of the Vastitas Borealis Formation, which is119
Earliest Amazonian by definition [Tanaka, 2005] (3200–2000 Ma using the chronology of120
[Hartmann, 2005]). To the N of the domes, the Olympia Undae are underlain by up to121
800 m of horizontally-layered, relatively light-toned deposits forming the Olympia Planum122
rise (Figure 1; Byrne & Murray [2002]; Tanaka [2005]). Contour lines on the slope of the123
Olympia rise are truncated by some of the Scandia Tholi, implying that emplacement124
of these domes postdated deposition of the materials making up the Olympia Planum125
rise. However, the dark, gypsum- or bassanite-bearing [Langevin et al., 2005] dunes of126
the Olympia Undae embay and so postdate the moated domes.127
High-resolution images show that the domes have been mantled, confirming that they128
predate the last major glaciation 5 – 0.3 Ma. Pedestal (excess-ejecta) craters are found129
throughout the Scandia region. They are very likely to be erosionally-modified impact130
craters [Kadish et al., 2008], and imply at least one cycle of deposition, and incomplete131
removal, of a volatile-rich mantling unit. Because craters formed in the mantling unit may132
have been removed, crater-count chronologies are unlikely to be a good guide to absolute133
ages in Scandia. Context Camera (CTX) images show that the dome surfaces have far134
fewer pedestal craters than immediately adjacent plains. The simplest interpretation135
is that the domes formed after the erosional unconformity that created the pedestals.136
From this we infer that the moated domes are most likely Early Amazonian to Middle137
Amazonian in age (3200–200 Ma using the chronology of Hartmann [2005]). Alternatively,138
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 10 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
the domes may have been emplaced into a unit that has since been stripped back (J.A.139
Skinner, via e-mail).140
We now address the detailed morphology of individual domes.141
3. Characterization of moated domes
3.1. MOLA, CTX and HiRISE observations
Dome diameter ranges from 20 – 50 km (Table 1). Many have annular ridges and rings,142
and moats with a constant width (2.3 ± 0.37 km). MOLA topography shows that dome143
margins have gentle slopes (1 – 5◦). Steeper slopes are found on central peaks and peaks144
in annular ridges: these are almost always accompanied by a pit marginal to the peak145
(‘peak-marginal pit’), and have flank slopes of 5 – 9◦. Dome interiors are rough and146
blocky at the kilometer scale. MOLA topography shows narrow v-profile traces adjacent147
to some of the domes, but CTX resolves these apparent channels as the margins of scabby,148
pedestal bearing terrain; they are not fluvial channels.149
In CTX images, the dome interiors appear as trench-bounded zones of kilometer-sized,150
uplifted and jumbled ridges and blocks, set within scabby, layered plains bearing pedestal151
craters (refer to annotated Figure 4a). In some cases (e.g., MOC NA frame E0302376)152
flows from domes run into the moats. Alignments of blocks sometimes define arcs or153
broken rings. Lineations contouring around blocks and traced by frost or changes in tone154
resemble layers. Alternatively, their ragged planforms are consistent with shallow-seated155
gelifluction of the moderately steep slopes of blocks [Davis, 2001]. If the lineations do156
define layers internal to the blocks, this implies the absence of a mantle. Elsewhere, block157
topography appears softened, and HiRISE (High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment)158
shows boulder clusters (Figure 4c). Mantling by a geologically recent ice-rich material159
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 11
[Mustard et al., 2001] has obscured the detailed morphology of the underlying domes.160
There are exceptions: in the relatively steep E margin of one dome (#13 in Table 1), CTX161
shows approximately horizontal lineations that we interpret as layers. Both blocky and162
smooth appearing layers are present, which may correspond to boulder-rich and boulder-163
poor flows (Figure 4b).164
The domes are elliptical, with long axes preferentially oriented E-W (Figure 3), although165
with considerable scatter.166
3.2. Radial profiles
To quantify the morphometry of the domes, we have generated radial profiles for167
each dome using 256 ppd MOLA topography, using a method outlined in Appendix A1.168
Azimuthally-averaged profiles are shown in overview in Figure 5, and in more detail in169
Figure 6. Moats are present in the averaged profiles for many of the domes, even though170
radial averaging tends to mute and obscure the moats because it includes areas that have171
been modified subsequent to emplacement (for example, by impact ejecta). Many of the172
rings are located off-center within the domes; nevertheless, these are also present in many173
profiles. However, CTX shows that some of the ring structures that appear well-preserved174
in MOLA data are actually dissected/blocky. This is because the MOLA gridded dataset175
contains many interpolated pixels, and so does not capture the true roughness of the dome176
interiors. The vertical extent and average slope of the domes is remarkably consistent.177
The elevation of the summits above the plains ∆z = 432 ± 92 m (1 σ) (Table 1). The best-178
fitting simple cone has an aspect ratio (width:height) ∼ 100:1, confirming the remarkably179
low relief of the domes. Central peaks, which are definitely present in 17 domes, possibly180
present in 4, and absent in 8, have slopes in the range 5 - 9◦ (Table 1). Typical dimensions181
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 12 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
for these central peaks are 7 km (long axis) x 4 km (short axis). Peak-marginal pits or182
annular troughs are definitely present in 10 domes, possibly present in 2, and absent in the183
remaining 5 domes that have central peaks. Ridges defining concentric rings are present184
in 16 domes and possibly present in an additional 4. Inner ridges are always circular, even185
though parent domes are always elliptical. Outer ridges track elliptical dome flanks.186
3.3. Slope-aspect correlations
Many surface processes on Mars are affected by slope orientation. For example, gullies187
form preferentially on pole-facing slopes in the mid-latitudes [Head et al., 2008], and pole-188
facing slopes within spiral troughs on the NPLD are shallower than equator-facing slopes.189
To determine if the Scandia Tholi underwent aspect-dependent modification, we examined190
gridded MOLA data to look for correlations between the probability-density distribution191
of local topographic slope and aspect. We have defined a test region to include as many192
moated domes and ridge-bounded depressions as possible, but at the same time excluding193
areas of high albedo in the MOC WA Atlas of Mars, areas mapped as ice outliers on the194
USGS map of the Northern Plains, moated domes that are embayed by dunes (domes 23-195
25 and 27), and dune fields visible in CTX images and MOLA gridded topography (Figure196
7). A more conservative test region also excluded the ridge-bounded depressions. We also197
defined a control region, at the same latitude but 180◦ away in longitude (Figure 7). The198
region was defined by mirroring the outline of the test region through the 135E - 315E199
line, and translating the resulting polygon a short (< 100 km) distance to avoid the ejecta200
blankets of major craters.The control region has the same dimensions and is located at the201
same distance from the pole as the test region, but does not have dome-like features. The202
length scale of our analysis is 230 m (one MOLA pixel). We did not regionally detrend the203
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 13
data, because our assessment is that the regional slope was established by basin-forming204
impacts, before the Scandia Tholi were emplaced. We used the 256 ppd MOLA polar205
gridded topography for all our measurements, because the 512 ppd grid has only partial206
coverage of the dome field (and a greater fraction of interpolated pixels).207
The test region shows a statistically significant fractional excess of slopes steeper than208
4◦ that are S-facing, and a deficit of slopes steeper than 4◦ that are N-facing (Figure 8a).209
The control region shows no such anomaly; the orientation of steep slopes is consistent210
with a random distribution (Figure 8b). An analysis with smaller aspect bins (not shown)211
indicated that shallow slopes in the control region tend to be E-facing, consistent with212
the regional tilt. Only N-S tilting would affect the slope statistics used here, and the tilt213
values (∼ 0.05◦) are insufficient to change the fractional differences significantly.214
The MOLA ‘count’ file shows that many of the pixels in the 256 ppd dataset are215
interpolated, and, even in pixels that contain a MOLA shot, the data have been migrated216
to the center of the pixel. This begs the question of whether the slope-aspect anomaly is217
the result of the processing steps which translate raw MOLA data to gridded topography.218
To address this concern, we turned to the underlying PEDR (Precision Experimental Data219
Record) data. We used the Mars Orbital Data Explorer (http://ode.rsl.wustl.edu/mars/)220
to generate a shapefile containing all PEDR records in the vicinity of the test region and221
control region. We used ArcGIS to clip the shapefile to the polygons bounding the region222
of interest, and extracted tracks from the resulting database. In subsequent analysis, we223
used only track segments (lines joining two MOLA spot points) of length < 450 m and224
whose 2 neighbouring track segments also had length < 450 m. Because in the absence225
of clouds and instrument problems MOLA spots are seperated by no more than ∼ 300226
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 14 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
m, this procedure excluded areas where MOLA had difficulty gathering data. We then227
converted the latitude and longitude values from the track segments to x and y coordinates228
(approximating Mars as a sphere), and found the slope for each track segment. Because229
the Mars Global Surveyor ground tracks run approximately N-S in both the test and230
control regions, we were only able to compare the steepness distributions of N-facing to231
S-facing slopes. Shallow slopes are equally likely to face N as S (Figure 9). In the test232
region, but not in the control region, slopes steeper than 5◦ are more likely to face S. This233
excess is particularly noticeable for slopes steeper than 6◦ (Figure 9). When the ridge-234
bounded depressions are masked out of the control region, the excess of steep, S-facing235
slopes is less striking but still significant, and is noticeable for slopes steeper than 8◦.236
3.4. Mineralogical analysis using visible and near-infrared imaging spectroscopy
We have investigated the mineralogical composition of the mud volcanoes area using237
OMEGA (Observatoire pour la Mineralogie, l’Eau, les Glaces, et l’Activite, Bibring [2007])238
and CRISM (Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars, Murchie et al.239
[2009]) hyperspectral data. OMEGA has 352 contiguous channels in the wavelength range240
0.38 - 5.1 µm, giving near laboratory-like spectra for each pixel of images acquired with241
a spatial resolution ranging from <350 m to 5 km per pixel. CRISM has 2 overlapping242
detectors with 6.6 nm spectral resolution, a VIS channel in the wavelength range 0.36 - 1.1243
µm, and an IR detector in the wavelength range 1.0 - 3.9 µm. It has a maximum spatial244
resolution of 18m. All images were corrected for atmospheric effects using the standard245
empirical method (the ‘volcano-scan’ correction, using the spectral ratio of Olympus Mons’246
summit and base scaled to the depth of the 2 µm CO2 band; Langevin et al. [2005]). Table247
3 gives details of the analyzed images.248
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 15
Since most mineralogical spectral information is contained in the 0.9 – 2.5 µm wave-249
length range, we focused our analysis on this domain. Figure 10a shows one of the studied250
OMEGA cubes, acquired with a spatial resolution of 4 km-per-pixel. Figure 10b shows251
the average spectra taken above the Scandia Tholi. These spectra appear at first order252
very homogeneous. In order to emphasize subtle and diagnostic spectral signatures, these253
spectra have also been ratioed to a neutral area taken outside the mud volcanoes. This254
technique proved useful in prior searches for phyllosilicates [Poulet et al., 2005; Mustard255
et al., 2008]. However, in our case the ratioed spectra on OMEGA data do not reveal256
any diagnostic band above the noise level. We performed a similar investigation at higher257
spatial resolution using CRISM FRT (Full Resolution Targeted Observation) and HRL258
(Half Resolution Long Observation) data. Three cubes cover welt # 13, a relatively well-259
preserved dome. Two of these CRISM cubes (000093F9 and 0009B30, acquired in January260
2008) display very strong water ice bands, which precludes the analysis of the underlying261
mineralogy. Only one cube (000BACF, Figure 10c) is free of ice. However, as was the case262
for the OMEGA data at lower spatial resolution, no diagnostic absorption bands showed263
up in the spectral ratio analysis of this cube (Figure 10d).264
We have also performed a spectral mixture analysis through by using an improved265
iterative linear unmixing model [Combe, 2005; Combe et al., 2008]. Details of the approach266
are given in Appendix A2. Some spectra could be fit by a mixture of pyroxenes and267
sometimes clays, but our assessment is that the clay components were probably model268
artifacts, as spectral ratio and band depth analysis did not show corresponding diagnostic269
bands above the noise level.270
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 16 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
The question of the bulk mineralogical composition of the welts therefore remains open.271
One possibility is that the domes are made entirely of the material of which we see the272
spectral properties in Figure 10b, with no particular diagnostic band appearing above the273
noise level. Another more probable explanation is that a pervasive dust cover prevents us274
from seeing the underlying materials in this area.275
4. Origin scenarios
4.1. What needs to be explained?
The salient features of the large, moated domes are: internal collapse features; central276
peaks; nested rises and slumps; jumbled interiors with multiple pits and peaks; overall277
elliptical shape with a preferred E-W long-axis orientation (Figure 3); subdued relief278
(summits 432 ± 92 m (n = 29) above the background plains, with central peak slopes279
typically 4 - 7◦); and circumferential moats (Table 1; Figure 4). Spectral analysis shows280
pyroxenes, but strong hydration bands or phyllosilicate signatures are not found. Steep281
south-facing slopes are over-represented (Figure 9), consistent with insolation-dependent282
modification of slopes (e.g., Kreslavsky & Head [2003]). A successful formation hypothesis283
must account for all of these features.284
Alternative explanations for the origin of the domes (Table 2) include that they are285
glacial features (pingos, kettles or kames), igneous features (effusive, viscous ‘pancake’286
igneous domes; tuyas; or the result of explosive igneous volcanism), or the result of mud287
volcanism (mud volcanoes, mud diapirs, or stratified sedimentary uplifts). We now address288
each mechanism in turn.289
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 17
4.2. Glaciation alone?
Pingos (ice-cored domes) and kames (till accumulations against the edge of glaciers) have290
some attributes that overlap with the moated domes, but do not share all characteristics291
(Table 2). They are composed of volatile material; they are common in deglacial and292
proglacial settings; and they form flat-topped or hemispherical structures, often with a293
central pit, consistent with the appearance of the ridge-bounded depressions [Fishbaugh294
& Head, 2001]. However, if the domes are pingos, then their interiors would be primarily295
water ice, and ice-rice deposits of this size would have been detected by MARSIS (Watters296
et al. [2006]) or SHARAD (SHAllow RADar, Holt et al. [2008]) mapping. In addition,297
pingos of the scale of the large, moated domes are absent on Earth. Kames (irregular,298
stratified proglacial sediment wedges) and kettles (depressions formed by the melting of299
calved blocks of ice) are ice-marginal features that form when the ice sheet is losing mass300
by melting. Sustained low surface temperatures (e.g., Shuster & Weiss [2005]) indicate301
that sublimation ablation is likely to have been the dominant loss term for ice sheets302
on Mars throughout the Amazonian. Nested rises and slumps defining large-scale ring303
structures are not expected outcomes of pingo formation, but they arise naturally from304
caldera subsidence during igneous volcanism and mud volcanism. Finally, the consistent305
E-W elongation direction of the moated domes (Figure 3) is not easily explained if the306
moated domes are pingos, but can be understood if the domes are extrusive constructs307
sourced from dykes. Elsewhere on Mars, pingos proposed on the basis of low-resolution308
imagery are – with few exceptions – not supported by (ongoing) HiRISE imaging [Dundas309
& McEwen, 2009; Burr et al., 2009].310
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 18 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
4.3. Igneous volcanism?
Every object in the solar system with a silicate crust and diameter > 1000 km shows311
magmatic volcanism, whereas mud volcanism has only been confirmed on Earth. There-312
fore, when assessing an extraterrestrial construct, a high prior probability should be as-313
signed to igneous volcanism. Andesitic to rhyolitic caldera-forming eruptions on Earth’s314
continents leave large collapse cavities that are often partly filled by resurgent domes. Off-315
shore, basaltic caldera-forming eruptions leave moated depressions [Mueller et al., 2008].316
We do not rule out explosive igneous volcanism. However, the uniform and low peak eleva-317
tion of the moated domes, and their low overall relief with nested rises and slumps, argues318
against caldera-forming magmatic eruptions (Table 2). Insolation-dependent modification319
of steep slopes (Figure 9) suggests that the domes are volatile-rich, which is inconsistent320
with igneous volcanism. Geologically recent igneous volcanism near the North Pole of321
Mars would be surprising (though not impossible) given that the lithosphere was thick322
and cold (Te > 300 km) at the time of Planum Boreum loading [Phillips et al., 2008]. Polar323
cones proposed to be young volcanoes early in the Mars Global Surveyor mission [Garvin324
et al., 2000] have recently been re-interpreted as erosional outliers [Warner & Farmer,325
2008]. Effusive volcanism on the terrestrial planets produces smooth shields [Basaltic326
Volcanism Study Project, 1981], in contrast to the blocky, disrupted dome interiors with327
their multiple pinnacles and pits. Pancake domes on Venus have no good Earth analogs,328
but are interpreted to be basaltic (less likely, rhyolitic) extrusions [Stofan et al., 2000].329
Unlike the moated domes, they have steep sides and cracked interiors, and lack multiple330
peaks and pits. Tuyas (subglacial volcanoes) tend to be flat-topped, ridge-like structures,331
and these are in fact seen in the Hesperian-aged Dorsa Argentea Formation near the South332
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 19
Pole of Mars (Sisyphi Montes; Ghatan & Head [2002]). The eroded appearance of the333
moated domes in MOLA topography is in contrast to the relatively uneroded Sisyphi334
Montes, which are older and at comparable latitudes. The simplest interpretation is that335
the moated domes are composed of material that is more susceptible to sublimation and336
aeolian erosion than that making up the Sisyphi Montes. (Alternatively, the higher at-337
mospheric pressure in the northern lowlands favors transient liquid water, which is an338
effective erosional agent in periglacial environments on Earth [Davis, 2001]). We con-339
clude that the degraded state of the moated domes argues against the hypothesis that the340
moated domes are tuyas.341
4.4. Mud volcanism hypothesis
1. Morphological features of the large, moated domes are hard to explain other than by342
mud volcanism343
Mud volcanoes develop when ‘fluid-rich, fine-grained sediments ascend within a litholog-344
ical section because of their buoyancy’ [Kopf, 2002]. Common attributes of mud volcanoes345
on Earth include collapse cavities, subdued relief, and multiple pinnacles and peaks. Like346
igneous volcanoes, many mud volcanoes develop calderas [Evans et al., 2008], but even347
mature mud volcanoes can lack central vents (e.g., Figure 11).348
The best terrestrial analogs we have found to the large, moated domes are the offshore349
mud volcano provinces of the Norwegian continental margin [Akhmetzhanov et al., 2008],350
Gulf of Cadiz [Somoza et al., 2003; Akhmetzhanov et al., 2008], Eastern Mediterranean Sea351
[Limonov et al., 1994] (Figure 11), and especially the South Barbados Accretionary Prism352
[Deville et al., 2006] (Figure 12). The S Barbados Accretionary Prism shows elliptical353
uplifts (preferentially oriented N-S) with central collapses, dotted with mud volcanoes.354
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 20 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
The uplifts reach elevations of up to 200 m above the adjacent seabed, and have blocky,355
irregular interiors. Seismic imaging confirms that the uplifts are stratified, rather than356
chaotic [Deville et al., 2006]. Their long axes are up to 20 km long, within a factor of 2 of357
the size of the Martian moated domes. The Gulf of Cadiz lacks the elliptical uplifts of the358
Barbados province. However, its mud volcanoes show central peaks, peak-marginal pits,359
moats, and (in the largest structure, 5 km in diameter) hummocky, km-scale roughness360
in the dome interior. The Cadiz mud volcanoes are probably related to elongate diapiric361
ridges of shale and marl [Fernandez-Puga et al., 2007]. These two mud volcano provinces362
are unusually well-imaged, and it is possible that other mud volcano provinces (e.g., the363
South Caspian Sea) will show a similarly close resemblance to the Scandia Tholi once364
multibeam bathymetry becomes publicly available.365
We now turn to individual mud volcanoes that for which high-resolution bathymetry is366
available. The TREDMAR mud volcano in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (Figure 11)367
show multiple pinnacles and pits within a very rough dome interior, bounded by a well-368
defined moat. These attributes make the TREDMAR volcano resemble the Scandia Tholi369
(Figure 4a). High-resolution bathymetry of the Hakon Mosby mud volcano in the Barents370
Sea (not shown; see Beyer et al. [2005] and Feseker et al. [2008]) exhibits nested rises and371
slumps, jumbled, fractured blocks, and a circumferential moat. Like the TREDMAR mud372
volcano, it is morphologically similar to (although significantly smaller than) the Martian373
moated domes shown in Figure 4a. There is no central peak. Interestingly, with the374
increase in resolution from multibeam to ROV maps, nested annular crests and slumps375
are dissected into a complex patchwork of disaggregated blocks. A similar increase in376
complexity is found going from MOLA to CTX maps of the large moated domes.377
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 21
No single mud volcano on Earth reaches the size of the large moated domes. The largest378
known [Davies & Stewart, 2005] is 10 km in diameter, with annular structures traced to379
depth by 3D seismic investigations [Stewart & Davies, 2006]. The sizes and slopes of380
subaerial mud volcanoes on Earth are, however, consistent with the central and marginal381
peaks of the large moated domes.382
Mud volcanism can account for all of the morphometric features seen at the Scandia383
Tholi. In particular, moats and peak-marginal pits are ubiquitous near mud volcanoes on384
Earth and are interpreted as subsidence features. Annular troughs are probable ring-fault385
graben, similar to those seen in high-resolution seismic bathymetry of mud volcanoes in386
the Gulf of Cadiz [Akhmetzhanov et al., 2008]. Central and marginal peaks may be mud387
mounds above localized centers of activity, and outer ridges that track track elliptical388
dome flanks may be flow features. The low relief of the Scandia Tholi is also consistent389
with mud volcanism.390
Circumferential moats may be formed by flexure, extension, sublimation of a volatile-391
rich debris blanket [Hauber et al., 2008], mining by katabatic winds [Warner & Farmer,392
2008], thermal erosion of ice-rich material by magma or lava [McInnis et al., 2007], or393
subsidence after removal of material from an underlying reservoir. Subsidence moats are394
very common around submarine mud volcanoes on Earth. If the moats are caused by395
subsidence, as would be the case for mud volcanoes, then they would be expected to396
have a constant width controlled by the depth to that reservoir and overburden flexural397
rigidity (unless they are faulted). If, instead, the moats are a flexural response to loading398
by the domes, moat depth would be proportional to the weight of dome material within399
an annulus of width ∼ 2.5α inboard of the moat, where the flexural parameter α =400
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 22 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
(4D/∆ρg)0.25 (in which D is the flexural rigidity, ∆ρ is the density contrast, and g is401
gravity) is similar to the moat width [Watson, 2001]. We measured moat width and depth402
for the 13 domes with well-defined moats. Neither showed any correlation with dome403
height. If the density of dome-forming material does not vary between domes, which404
is reasonable, this excludes a flexural origin for the moats. Excluding one apparently405
atypical dome, moat width is (2.3 ± 0.37) km (n=12). This narrow range of values406
suggests that moat width is related to the depth to a shallow reservoir, consistent with407
the mud volcanism hypothesis. If the moats resulted from mining by katabatic winds, we408
would expect the margins of ejecta blankets in the study region to also show moats. The409
ejecta blanket margins are steeper and taller than the moat margins and hence should410
produce stronger katabatic winds. Because they do not, we reject mining by katabatic411
winds as an explanation for the moats.412
Next we consider dome relief. On Earth, offshore mud volcanoes never show more than413
1 km relief, but basaltic volcanoes can be up to 10 km above surrounding topography (Big414
Island, Hawaii). These differences may be related to the depth of the source reservoir: the415
magma making up basaltic volcanoes is sourced from greater depths than the fluidized416
sediments making up mud volcanoes. Therefore, isostatic balance sets only a weak upper417
limit on the height of basaltic volcanoes, but a strong upper limit on the height of mud418
volcanoes. (This assumes that a free connection exists between the source reservoir and419
surface; see Wilson et al. [1992] for an alternative view). Onshore, mud breccia and clay420
are more easily eroded than basaltic lava, so basaltic volcanoes would show more relief421
than onshore mud volcanoes even if the depths to their source reservoirs were equal.422
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 23
In conclusion, mud volcano provinces on Earth offer close morphological analogs to the423
Scandia Tholi; all of the key features of the Scandia Tholi (Table 2) are characteristic424
of mud volcanism on Earth and taken together the suite of features is suggestive of mud425
volcanism. We speculate that the Martian moated domes more closely resemble subma-426
rine mud volcanoes on Earth than they do terrestrial mud volcanoes on Earth because427
terrestrial mud volcanoes are rapidly eroded by rain.428
2. The Scandia Tholi region has undergone insolation-dependent modification429
Mud volcanism brings water to the surface, which under Martian conditions would430
rapidly evaporate or freeze. Icy slopes on Mars are subject to aspect-dependent modifi-431
cation. Aspect-dependent modification generally works through insolation/temperature-432
dependent rates of ablation, accumulation, or ice creep, and produces anomalies centered433
on north or south. If dome composition includes a significant ice component, then aspect-434
dependent processing could cause a slope-frequency anomaly centered on N or S. Such435
an observation would support the hypothesis that the moated domes are the result of436
mud volcanism, because rhyolitic or basaltic volcanoes would not be expected to show an437
anomaly.438
Because the slope anomaly occurs for slopes far shallower than the angle of repose for dry439
materials, dry landslides cannot explain the anomaly. Creep in ice has an Arrhenius-law440
dependence on temperature, so warm ice would flow more quickly than cold ice [Parsons441
& Nimmo, 2009]. Belts of north-south slope asymmetry found at 40-50◦ latitude in both442
hemispheres have been attributed to preferential melting of ground ice on pole-facing443
slopes during periods of high mean obliquity [Kreslavsky & Head, 2003]. At the latitude444
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 24 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
of the moated domes, the tendency for icy pole-facing slopes to suffer melting at high445
obliquity is even greater [Costard et al., 2002].446
If ice were preferentially deposited on cold, N-facing slopes at present-day obliquity447
(∼25◦), this would provide an alternative mechanism for suppressing steep N-facing slopes.448
This introduces a possible problem for interpretation: that the volatile content implied449
by our results might belong to a thin drape compositionally unrelated to the material450
making up the bulk of the domes and ridge-bounded depressions. Some evidence against451
this possibility comes from the control region, which has basketball terrain indicating the452
presence of an ice mantle, but no slope anomaly. Given that it is not associated with a453
slope anomaly in the control region, it is unlikely that the formation of basketball terrain454
is responsible for the slope anomaly in the test region. We conclude that the moated455
domes and ridge-bounded depressions are likely to have a significant volatile content.456
These volatiles are (relatively) deep-seated, in contrast to the superficial seasonal frosts457
picked up by the spectral analysis.458
3. Geological and geophysical context is consistent with mud volcanism459
Mud volcanism requires a reservoir of overpressured, fine-grained sediments. In this460
section we outline indirect evidence that the Scandia Tholi region is underlain by fine-461
grained sediments, and in the next section we suggest mechanisms that could generate462
the required overpressure.463
Quasi-circular depressions visible in MOLA topography, but hard to discern in Viking464
images, are interpreted as buried Noachian impact craters [Frey et al., 2002]. The strong465
correlation between depression depth and depression diameter for quasi-circular depres-466
sions within a single province is interpreted as due to differential compaction of a cover467
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 25
material. Variability in the depth:diameter ratios between provinces is interpreted as468
due to variations in the thickness of that cover material [Buczkowski et al., 2005]. The469
depth:diameter ratio of quasi-circular depressions found in MOLA data for the Bore-470
alis back-basin (which includes the Scandia domefield; Figure 1) is among the lowest in471
the northern plains [Buczkowski, 2007]. This suggests that the thickness of compactible472
sediments is greater beneath the Scandia Tholi than elsewhere in the northern plains473
[Buczkowski, 2007]. However, because compaction is largely irreversible (Ingebritsen et474
al. [2006], p. 66), past overriding of the Borealis back-basin by a thick ice sheet is also475
consistent with the depth:diameter observations.476
After correction for North Polar Layered Deposits (NPLD) density, gravity maps based477
on Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) Radio Science data show a negative Bouguer anomaly478
centered on 77.5N, 192E [Neumann et al., 2004]. This is the largest-amplitude anomaly479
of this type north of 55N. Close to the center of the Borealis back-basin, the ∼ 100 Mgal480
negative anomaly could be generated by substituting 3km ice, or 6km sediments, for the481
same thickness of basaltic crust.482
These observations suggest that low-density, compactible sediments (for example clay-483
stone or mudstone) are unusually thick or unusually close to the surface in the Borealis484
back-basin. Geologic mapping supports this inference [Tanaka et al., 2008]. Because low-485
density fine-grained sediments are required for mud volcanism, this is consistent with the486
hypothesis that the Scandia Tholi are mud volcanoes. Large, moated domes with jumbled487
interiors are not found elsewhere on Mars, suggesting that unusual conditions – such as a488
thick basin fill, or a nearby ice sheet – are required for their genesis.489
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 26 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
4. Ice sheet emplacement and removal produces stresses sufficient to trigger mud490
volcanism491
On Earth, mud volcanism is usually triggered by compressional tectonism or rapid492
sedimentation [Kopf, 2002]. Mars has undergone only minor contractional strain in the493
Amazonian [Okubo & Schultz, 2006], making compressional tectonism an unlikely trigger.494
Although post-Noachian catastrophic outflows from the southern highlands would have495
caused rapid sedimentation, it is not clear that their deposits extend as far as the Borealis496
back-basin, and catastrophic outflow activity had sharply declined by the Amazonian,497
when the Scandia Tholi formed. Although rapid sedimentation from the southern high-498
lands during the Noachian could have generated overpressure at depth, we propose that499
mud volcanism was triggered later through ice sheet emplacement or removal.500
When pore fluids in a sedimentary deposit cannot be expelled fast enough in response501
to further loading, the pressure of the pore fluids increases - a condition known as dise-502
quilibrium compaction. This is one of the most effective ways of generating overpressure503
in basins [Swarbrick et al., 2002], alongside hydrocarbon generation at depth. Shale per-504
meability k in these basins on Earth ranges from 10−22 – 10−18 m2. If sediments were505
rapidly deposited in the Borealis back-basin, the basin fill has a permeability similar to506
shale permeability on Earth, and the annually-averaged surface temperature on Mars has507
been below freezing since deposition, then overpressure generated by disequilibrium com-508
paction can only be relieved by fracturing the cryosphere or lateral diffusion. The lateral509
diffusion timescale τ = L2/k over the radius L of the Borealis back-basin (∼ 500 km)510
is greater than the duration of the Amazonian, provided k ≤ 10−6 m2. The advance of511
the freezing front as the lithosphere cools could also contribute to overpressure [Wang et512
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 27
al., 2006]. Changes in ice loading near the North Pole, driven by chaotic shifts in mean513
obliquity (e.g., Putzig et al. [in press]), could trigger mud volcanism either during ice514
sheet emplacement or removal. Emplacement of an ice sheet in the area of the moated515
domes would cause differential stress (10.4 MPa for a 3km-thick ice sheet) within the over-516
pressured aquifer, favoring mud volcanism just beyond the ice margin. Through thermal517
insulation, it would also gradually thin the zone of frozen ground beneath it. If subsequent518
deglaciation outpaced freezing-front deepening, then the overpressured aquifer would be519
left close to the surface, favoring hydrofracturing of the permafrost during a transient520
period when it is unusually thin.521
This proposal has several attractive features: there are multiple lines of evidence that522
the ice-rich polar plateau once extended further south in the moated domes sector. These523
include sinuous ridges which we interpret as moraines or eskers, the Basal Unit [Fishbaugh524
& Head, 2001], the asymmetry of the present day Planum Boreum [Kite et al., 2009], and525
the presence of ice outliers that may mark the former outer edge of the ice-rich polar526
plateau [Zuber et al., 1998].527
Assuming that the eruption initiates by hydrofracturing, we would expect both the528
initiating dyke, and any resultant extrusion, to be elongated perpendicular to least prin-529
cipal strain. There is a clear preference for domes to be elongated E-W (Figure 3), and530
chains defined by alignments of nearby domes are also oriented E-W. This implies that the531
least principal stress was oriented N-S. A simple explanation is that the lithosphere was532
subjected to regionally extensive N-S stress associated with the Alba Patera dyke swarm533
[Tanaka, 2006]. However, there are two problems with this explanation. The first is that534
the preferred orientations do not line up with the continuation of mapped Alba Patera535
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 28 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
dykes. The second is that there is more scatter in the distribution of orientations than ex-536
pected for a dyke swarm at great distance from its center. Ice sheet emplacement/removal,537
which is often lobate or irregular, can explain both observations. Therefore, we interpret538
the dome elongation data as reflecting a stress field produced by expansion/contraction539
of an ice sheet. Flexural stress due to an ice sheet will depend on the exact distribution540
of ice, and the elastic thickness of the lithosphere. However, for a concentrated (line or541
point) load, there is in general an upper crust zone of extension 1 - 3 α from the load542
(where α is the flexural parameter; Watson [2001]), which would favor hydrofracturing.543
Alternatively, and similar to chaos terrain formation, the required overpressures could be544
generated by a magmatic intrusion at depth [McKenzie & Nimmo, 1999] driving explosive545
hydrothermal activity [Skinner & Mazzini, 2009]. If the gypsum adjacent to the Scandia546
Tholi is sourced from the Scandia Tholi, then hydrothermal activity could also account for547
the formation of the gypsum [Skinner & Mazzini, 2009]. Whatever the ultimate trigger,548
the multi-kilometer scale and obliteration of craters in the moated domes region suggests a549
more violent process than that usually associated with mud volcanism. We speculate that550
on a planet with a thick cryosphere, greater overpressures can accumulate before reservoir551
drainage than for similar tectonic settings on Earth. Therefore, when mud volcanism552
occurs, it has a more explosive character. Preliminary simulations of sediment eruptions553
at high overpressures are reported by Gisler [2009].554
We conclude that compressional tectonism is not required for Martian mud volcanism.555
Summary556
Key evidence in support of the mud volcanism hypothesis comes from (1) a comparison557
of morphological attributes of the large, moated domes to those of mud volcanism on558
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 29
Earth. We also show (2) that the Scandia Tholi region has undergone insolation-dependent559
modification, probably indicating a volatile-rich composition, (3) that the mud volcano560
hypothesis is supported by the geological context, and (4) the existence of at least one561
physical model for the triggering of mud volcanism in the Scandia region.562
The data are insufficient to show that the Scandia Tholi must be the result of mud563
volcanism. Rather, we assess mud volcanism to be the least unsatisfactory of a range of564
origin scenarios.565
5. Discussion
5.1. Relationship to other candidate Mars mud volcanoes
Mud volcano candidates have been reported from other sites on Mars [Farrand et al.,566
2005; Skinner & Tanaka, 2007; Kangi, 2007; Skinner & Mazzini, 2009]. All reported mud567
volcano fields are within the northern lowlands, and almost all are close to the Martian568
dichotomy boundary. However, the other mud volcano candidates have diameters of < 5569
km (compared to 30 - 50 km for the moated domes) and are (usually) morphologically570
simpler. These differences can be interpreted to mean (1) that the Scandia Tholi are571
not the result of mud volcanism, (2) that the triggering process differed between the572
Scandia Tholi and the features at the dichotomy boundary, (3) that the Scandia Tholi573
are more deeply eroded than the dichotomy boundary dome fields, (4) that the source574
layer for the Scandia Tholi was deeper and/or thicker, or (5) that the Scandia Tholi575
include a component of stratified sediment uplift [Deville et al., 2006], or mud diapirism576
[Fernandez-Puga et al., 2007], superposed by mud volcanoes. It is possible that cryosphere577
thickness sets the scale of fluid outflow events; for obliquities < 54◦, equilibrium cryosphere578
thickness is greater at the poles than at the dichotomy boundary. We speculate that579
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 30 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
the differences between the Scandia Tholi and the dichotomy boundary mud volcano580
candidates may be related to ice sheet triggering for the Scandia Tholi, versus triggering581
by rapid sedimentation, volcanic destabiliation or tectonic shortening for the dichotomy582
boundary mud volcanoes [Skinner & Mazzini, 2009].583
On Earth, mud volcanism is most often driven by the production of methane that is584
produced by the decay of buried organic matter [Kopf, 2002]. Methane plumes have585
been detected on Mars [Mumma et al., 2009], although their reported location is not586
correlated with the reported mud volcanoes [Skinner & Mazzini, 2009]. The poor state587
of preservation of the Scandia Tholi indicates that they are very unlikely to be active.588
Nonetheless, mud volcanism on Mars would sample deeper levels in the northern lowlands589
basin fill, probably deposited at a time when rates of physical erosion and formation of590
aqueous minerals were higher than at present [Oehler & Allen, 2009].591
5.2. Gypsum and the Scandia Tholi
The Olympia Dunefield, adjacent to the large, moated domes, is gypsum-rich [Langevin592
et al., 2005], and hydration signatures extend across the dark polar dune belt [Horgan et593
al., 2009]. This detection is startling, because it does not conform to the emerging con-594
sensus on Mars’ aqueous history – that global conditions may have supported extensive595
aqueous alteration prior to > 3.5 Ga, but not since [Mustard et al., 2008]. Researchers596
responding to the discovery of gypsum have either (1) invoked jokulhlaups (glacial out-597
burst floods) discharging from beneath the present-day Planum Boreum [Fishbaugh et al.,598
2007], (2) suggested that sulfate minerals can form within the present-day, cold-based ice599
sheet [Niles & Michalski, 2009], or (3) hypothesized transport of gypsum from depth by600
mud volcanoes [Tanaka, 2006]. This work is important, because if gypsum can form in the601
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 31
present-day Martian environment, it breaks the link between sulfate deposition and past602
environments conducive to life [Catling et al., 2006]. Our results are consistent with the603
mud volcanism hypothesis. However, the closest of the Scandia Tholi is ∼380 km from604
the area of maximum gypsum concentration, and the center of the domefield is ∼500 km605
from the area of maximum gypsum concentration. As we shall now discuss, it is not clear606
whether this is close enough to source the dunes.607
The tight link between the gypsum signature and the girdle of dark dunes around608
Planum Boreum suggests, but does not require, that the gypsum is present in grains that609
are able to saltate. Because there is a minimum for grain mobilization by wind on Mars610
at ∼ 102 µm [Greeley & Iverson, 1985], and because Martian winds are only marginally611
able to move sand [Sullivan et al., 2008], it is possible for gypsum to be broken down612
to sizes too fine to be easily lofted by the wind, and which would remain in suspension613
once airborne. Assuming this to be the case, an important, unconstrained parameter614
is the length scale over which saltating gypsum sand is comminuted to fine grains that615
are unable to saltate. That length scale must be less for gypsum than for quartz sand,616
since gypsum is softer than quartz. This would define the ‘search radius’ for the gypsum617
source region. At White Sands National Monument, New Mexico, gypsum grain size618
data show rapid comminution (e-folding reduction length scale = 6.2 km, including some619
unpublished data supplied by R.P. Langford, via e-mail) with increasing distance from620
the shoreline of Pleistocene Lake Otero, whose deflation sources the dunes [Langford,621
2003]. However, it is not clear how to relate these data to present-day Mars, because the622
rapid reduction in grain-size at White Sands may be a transient associated with increasing623
roundness, and because gypsum grains partly recover from saltational abrasion through624
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 32 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
reprecipitation in wet interdunes (R.P. Langford, via e-mail). Wind-tunnel experiments625
on sulfate comminution at Mars atmospheric pressure have not been carried out. In the626
absence of these data, we cannot say whether the communition length scale for gypsum627
breakdown is:– tens of km, in which case the gypsum must have formed from precipitation628
out of solution very close to or within the dunefield [Fishbaugh et al., 2007]; hundreds of629
km, in which case the veneer atop the polar plateau [Horgan et al., 2009], or the Scandia630
Tholi (Tanaka [2006]; this paper) are both possible sources; or thousands of km, in which631
case the gypsum could have been reworked from ancient crust in the southern hemisphere.632
We conclude that wind tunnel experiments on sulfate comminution at Mars atmospheric633
pressure are highly desirable, because they could set tight constraints on the origin of634
hydrated minerals near the North Pole of Mars.635
5.3. Depth to source reservoir
Isostatic considerations indicate that, if the domes formed subaerially, then their source636
reservoir is unlikely to be the Vastitas Borealis Formation, because the Vastitas Borealis637
Formation is too thin [Kreslavsky & Head, 2002] to engender 400+ m of extrusional relief638
(Table 1). We assume that the maximum height of mud expulsion is set by isostatic639
balance:640
dsρb = (r + ds)ρd (1)
where ds is the depth to the source reservoir, ρb is the density of overburden, r is dome641
relief, and ρd is the density of dome-forming material. If ρd = 1.8 – 2.3 g cm−3 as expected642
for mud, and ρb = 3.0 g cm−3 (basalt), our measurements of r (Table 1) require ds 540-643
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 33
1370 m. This is a conservative estimate of source depth because the overburden density644
is likely to be less. Even if the domes are composed entirely of ice (ρd = 0.9 g cm−3), and645
the overburden is basalt sand with ice-filled pores, ds is still large (290m). This tends to646
support the proposal that ancient sediments are present at depth beneath the Northern647
Plains [Fairen et al., 2003].648
Alternatively, if the dome-forming material is silicate magma with a density of 2.65 –649
2.9 g cm−3, our results indicate a depth to the source layer for an overburden with the650
density of basalt of ∼3.5 km. This might represent a magma chamber at or near the top651
of the buried crater-bearing basement [Frey et al., 2002].652
5.4. Further tests of the mud volcanism hypothesis
Additional high-resolution data could help to constrain the origin of the domes. A653
HiRISE image in the area where CTX shows layers would help to determine whether the654
blocky appearance of some of the layers is due to boulders in a fine-grained matrix (which655
would be consistent with mud volcanism) or meter-scale cooling joints (which would not656
be consistent with mud volcanism). CRISM FRTs of young postglacial craters in the657
domes region might expose material from below the mantling layer. If mud volcanism or658
explosive hydrothermal activity is responsible for the moated domes, hydrated minerals659
would be expected.660
6. Conclusions
1. The Scandia Tholi are characterized by moats, internal collapse features, central661
peaks, nested rises and slumps, jumbled interiors with multiple pits and peaks, sub-662
dued, internally-consistent relief, elliptical margins showing a preferred E-W orientation,663
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 34 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
and susceptibility to sublimation or aeolian erosion. HiRISE shows their surfaces to be664
boulder-rich. A possible exposure of layers in the margin of one dome shows some boulder-665
rich layers.666
2. Azimuthally-averaged radial profiles confirm the existence of moats and indicate667
averaged slopes of ∼ 1 ◦.668
3. Slope-aspect relations show an excess of S-facing aspects (equivalently, a deficit of669
N-facing aspects) among steep slopes in the moated domes region. This indicates climatic670
modification of the moated domes region.671
4. OMEGA spectral analysis, supported by CRISM, shows the presence of pyroxene672
at the optical surface of the domes. Hydrated minerals, if present, are at or below the673
noise level. It is not clear what geological unit is the source of the detected minerals. The674
existence of a mantle suggests recent glaciation, in which case the minerals could form675
part of a lag deposit associated with windblown dust and need not be locally derived.676
5. The elevation of the moated dome peaks above the background plains has a narrow677
range, (432 ± 92)m (n = 29). If the height of the moated domes is related to the depth678
to the source reservoir, isostatic balance requires that the depth sampled by the moated679
domes, D ≥ 290 m. This rules out the Vastitas Borealis Formation as the source of the680
dome-forming materials.681
6. Because the length scale for comminution of saltating sulfate sand is not well con-682
strained, we cannot say whether the large moated domes are a possible source of the polar683
gypsum.684
7. Our assessment is that mud volcanism is a plausible scenario for the origin of the685
large moated domes. Some mud volcanic systems on Earth show all of the salient features686
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 35
of the large moated domes. Ice sheet emplacement or removal is a plausible trigger for687
mud volcanism on Mars. The geological history of the Scandia region is consistent with688
mud volcanism [Tanaka et al., 2008].689
8. However, the moated domes are, on average, 4 times larger than the largest mud vol-690
cano known on Earth, and the overall appearance of the moated domes is more disrupted691
than Earth mud volcanoes, suggesting explosive rather than purely effusive processes.692
These differences may indicate that the moated domes formed by explosive magmatic or693
hydrothermal eruptions, not mud volcanism; or they may include stratified sedimentary694
uplifts as well as mud volcanoes; or mud volcanism on a planet with a thick cryosphere695
may have a more explosive character [Gisler, 2009].696
9. Ongoing CRISM and HiRISE imaging can further test the mud volcanism hypothesis.697
Mud volcanism, if confirmed, would provide near-surface access to fine-grained sediments698
probably deposited early in Mars’ history [Oehler & Allen, 2009].699
Appendix A: Analysis of MOLA and OMEGA data
A1. Radial profiles of moated domes
Our objective was to collapse a three-dimensional dataset (elevation as a function of700
latitude and longitude) into the two dimensions of elevation and radius from dome center.701
The moated domes are 100 - 200 times larger than the pixels making up the gridded702
MOLA data, so it is reasonable to use gridded data. Constructing radial profiles requires703
a) a reliable definition of the dome center; b) a definition of the dome edge; c) given704
that many domes show gross deviations from radial symmetry, a method of normalizing705
to varying distances between centre and edge. Ideally, dome edges and centers would be706
defined automatically, but automatic fitting of ellipses to dome margins produced poor707
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 36 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
(scattered, high inter-profile s.d.) results. A revised method uses a manually defined,708
irregular dome edge/mask, and gives much improved results. For each dome, the mask is709
drawn ∼ 1 moat width from the outer edge of the moat where a moat is present (Figure710
13a), or a constant distance (∼ 2 moat widths) from the dome margin where a moat is711
not present. The simplest approach is to take the center to be the centroid of the mask.712
A better alternative is to optimize the center position, minimizing scatter (Figure 13b).713
We find center coordinates (i, j) such that a penalty function A is minimized714
A = f(i, j) =∑Rn
Rnσ(Rn) (A1)
where Rn is normalized radius from the center, and σ(Rn) is the standard deviation of715
profile elevation over 200 profiles with equal angular spacing (Figure 13c). The factor of716
Rn within the sum accounts for increase in spacing between profiles, which is proportional717
to Rn. This procedure yields well-defined local minima in A near the visually-picked dome718
center, which are often significantly offset from the centroid of the mask. All domes show719
global minima for centers near the mask edge, because many of the profiles cross only a720
single DEM element here and so have zero standard deviation. Therefore, we scanned721
over a restricted range of (i, j) close to the visually-picked dome center. An alternative722
center-finding criterion is to minimize deviation from circularity (the range of centre –723
mask edge distances). This gives similar results to finding the areal centroid of the mask.724
Once the dome edge and dome center have been defined, n radial profiles are drawn725
out from the dome center, each with x points. We used n = 180 and x = 200. To keep x726
constant, the point seperation is scaled to the distance between the center and the mask727
edge. A second-order global polynomial fit to the regional elevation trend is subtracted728
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 37
from all DEMs before processing. Results are shown in Figures 5 and 6 and discussed in729
Section 3.2.730
A2. Analysis of OMEGA data
OMEGA Method 1: Band depths (BDs). BDs were calculated at 1.8 µm, sensitive to low731
calcium pyroxenes (LCP); 2.2 µm, sensitive to high calcium pyroxenes (HCP); and 1.5 µm732
BD, to mask out ice pixels, particularly important for analyses in those northern regions.733
In addition, BD at 1.45 and 1.94 µm was used to map hydrated minerals. Combined, for734
example, with 1.7 µm and 2.2 µm BD, the hydration bands can provide solid evidence for735
gypsum [Langevin et al., 2005]. In several cases, we calculated spectral ratios to enhance736
the spectral signatures. The JGR-Planets Special Section on OMEGA/Mars Express737
[Bibring, 2007] provides more details on these methods.738
OMEGA Method 2: Improved linear unmixing model. One of the strengths of this model739
[Combe, 2005; Combe et al., 2008] is its ability to eliminate unphysical negative component740
mixing coefficients (in case of inexact spectral library for the area observed or non-linear741
intimate mixtures implied by multiple scattering) by iterative processes. Another strength742
is the use of artificial photometric spectral endmembers to take into account, at first order,743
photometric or grain size effects : a flat spectrum to consider pure albedo differences and744
positive/negative slope spectra to account for continuum slope variations. Its important745
to note here that this model gives the contributing percentage of each library mineral746
to the observed spectrum, but this cannot be associated with absolute compositional747
percentages of minerals. Instead, it gives a first idea of the general minerals or mineral748
families which may be present in a given region and of their relative concentrations. The749
spectral library included pyroxenes (hypersthene and diopside), olivine (forsterite and750
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 38 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
fayalite), phyllosilicates (kaolinite, smectite, muscovite, montmorillonite, illite, nontronite751
and chlorite), serpentines (chrysotile and lizardite), sulfates (alunite, gypsum, jarosite,752
kieserite and epsomite), carbonates (calcite, dolomite and siderite), iron oxides (hematite,753
goethite, ferrihydrite and maghemite) and water ice (frost). The image fraction values754
obtained (raw coefficients given by the model) were normalised to the 1.1 µm albedo, in755
order to best represent the spectral contribution of each endmember. We examined both756
normalized image fractions obtained by the model and correlations between endmember757
maps and (simple or ratioed) BD maps. Root mean square (RMS) image fractions were758
used to separate the real endmember contributions (low RMS) from the artificial ones759
(high RMS). We also extracted mean spectra of domes 2-9, 11-13, and 19, and tried to760
model them with various linear unmixings of different numbers of spectral poles selected761
in the library described above to best fit these data. This permitted us to look for spectral762
variations both between different selected domes and between the domes and the plains.763
In this case, the unmixing analysis did not provide significant additional interesting results764
compared to band depth analysis.765
Acknowledgments. We thank M.A. Kreslavsky for his valuable advice on MOLA data766
analysis, and M. Manga for proposing ice sheet removal as a trigger for mud volcanism.767
We are grateful to Eric Deville, who supplied Figure 12. J.A. Skinner provided advice768
on geologic context, and R.P. Langford shared unpublished gypsum grain size analyses.769
Much of this work was carried out while E.S.K. was at the Department of Earth Sciences,770
Cambridge University, and he thanks the Department librarians, Libby Tilley and Sarah771
Humbert, for their kindness.772
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 39
References
Akhmetzhanov, A.M., Kenyon, N.H., Ivanov, M.K., Westbrook, G., & Mazzini, A. (ed-773
itors), 2008, Deep-water depositional systems and cold seeps of the Western Mediter-774
ranean, Gulf of Cadiz and Norwegian continental margins. IOC Technical Series No. 76,775
UNESCO.776
Watson, A.B., 2001, Isostasy and flexure of the lithosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-777
versity Press.778
Beyer, A., Rathlau, R., & Schenke, H.W., 2005, Multibeam bathymetry of the Hakon779
Mosby mud volcano, Mar. Geophys. Res., 26, 61-75.780
Basaltic Volcanism Study Project, 1981, Basaltic Volcanism on the Terrestrial Planets,781
Pergamon Press, Inc., New York. 1286 pp.782
Bibring, J.-P., 2007, Introduction to special section: OMEGA/Mars Express Mars Surface783
and Atmospheric Properties, J. Geophys. Res., 112, E08S01, doi:10.1029/2007JE002935.784
Bibring J.P., and the OMEGA Co-I team, 2004, OMEGA : Observatoire pour la785
Mineralogie, l’Eau, les Glaces et l’Activite, in: Mars Express: the scientific payload. ed.786
by A. Wilson, scientific coordination: A. Chicarro. ESA SP-1240, Noordwijk, Nether-787
lands: ESA Publications Division, ISBN 92-9092-556-6, p. 37 49788
Boynton, W.V. et al., 2002, Distribution of hydrogen in the near surface of Mars: Evidence789
for subsurface ice deposits, Science, 297, 81-85.790
Buczkowski, D.L., 2007, Stealth quasi-circular depressions (sQCDs) in the northern low-791
lands of Mars, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 112, E09002, doi:10.1029/2006JE002836.792
Buczkowski, D.L., Frey, H.V., Roark, J.H., & McGill, G.E., 2005, Buried impact craters:793
A topographic analysis of quasi-circular depressions, Utopia Basin, Mars, J. Geophys.794
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 40 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Res. - Planets, 110, E03007, doi:10.1029/2004JE002324.795
Burr, D.M., Tanaka, K.L., & Yoshikawa, K., 2009, Pingos on Earth and Mars, Planetary796
and Space Science, 57(5-6), 541-555.797
Byrne, S., & B.C. Murray, North polar stratigraphy and the paleo-erg of Mars, J. Geophys.798
Res., 107(E6), 5044, doi:10.1029/2001JE001615.799
Catling, D.C., Wood, S.E., Leovy, C., Montgomery, D.R., Greenberg, H.M., Glein, C.R.,800
& Moore, J.M., 2006, Light-toned layered deposits in Juventae Chasma, Mars, Icarus,801
181, 26-51.802
Combe J.Ph., 2005, Etudes des Surfaces Planetaires par Teledetection Visible Infrarouge803
Hyperspectrale, PhD Thesis, University of Nantes (France), 298 pp.804
Combe, J.-Ph., et al., 2008, Analysis of OMEGA/Mars Express data hyperspectral data805
using a Multiple-Endmember Linear Spectral Unmixing Model (MELSUM): Methodol-806
ogy and first results, Planetary & Space Science, 56(7), 951-975.807
Costard, F., Forget, F., Mangold, N., & Peulvast, J.P., 2002, Formation of Recent Martian808
Debris Flows by Melting of Near-Surface Ground Ice at High Obliquity, Science, 295,809
110-113.810
Davies, R.J., & Stewart, S.A., 2005, Emplacement of giant mud volcanoes in the South811
Caspian Basin: 3D seismic reflection imaging of their root zones, J. Geol. Soc. London,812
162, 1-4.813
Davis, N., 2001, Permafrost: a guide to frozen ground in transition, Fairbanks: University814
of Alaska Press.815
Deville, E, Guerlais, S.-H., Callec, Y., Griboulard, R., Huyghe, P., Lallemant, S., Mascle,816
A., Noble, M., Schmitz, J., & the Caramba working group, 2006, Liquefied vs stratified817
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 41
sediment mobilization processes: Insight from the South of the Barbados accretionary818
prism, Tectonophysics, 428, 33-47.819
Dundas, C.M., & McEwen, A.S., An assessment of evidence for pingos on Mars using820
HiRISE, Icarus, in press, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.02.020.821
Evans, R.J., Stewart, S.A., & Davies, R.K., 2008, The structure and formation of mud822
volcano summit calderas, J. Geol. Soc., 165, 769-780.823
Fagan, A.L., & Sakimoto, S.E.H., 2009, Formation constraints on Martian north polar824
volcanic edifices, Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 40, abstract number 1976.825
Fairen, A.G., Dohm, J.M., Baker, V.R., de Pablo, M.A., Ruiz, J., Ferris, J.C., & Anderson,826
R.C., 2003, Episodic flood inundations of the northern plains of Mars, Icaurs, 165, 53-67.827
Farrand W.H., Gaddis L.R., & Keszthelyi, L., 2005, Pitted cones and domes on Mars:828
Observations in Acidalia Planitia and Cydonia Mensae using MOC, THEMIS, and TES829
data, J. Geophys. Res., 110(E5), E5005.830
Fernandez-Puga, M.C., Vazquez, J.T., Somoza, L., Dıaz del Rio, V., Medialdea, T., Mata,831
M.P., & Leon, R., 2007, Gas-related morphologies and diapirism in the Gulf of Cadiz,832
Geo-Mar. Lett., 27, 213-221.833
Feseker, T., Foucher, J.-P., & Harmegnies, F., 2008, Fluid flow or mud eruptions? Sedi-834
ment temperature distributions on Hakon Mosby mud volcano, SW Barents Sea slope,835
Mar. Geol., 247, 194-207.836
Fishbaugh, K., & Head, J.W., 2000, North polar region of Mars: Topography of the837
circumpolar deposits from Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter Data (MOLA) and evidence838
for asymmetric retreat of the polar cap. J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 105, 22455-22486.839
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 42 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Fishbaugh, K., & Head, J.W., 2001, Comparison of the north and south polar caps of840
Mars: New observations from MOLA data and discussion of some outstanding questions.841
Icarus 154, 145-161.842
Fishbaugh, K.E., Poulet, F., Langevin, Y., Chevrier, V., & Bibring, J.-P., 2007, On the843
origin of gypsum in the Mars North Polar Region, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets 112844
(E07002), doi: 10.1029/2006JE002862.845
Frey, H.V., Roark, J.H., Shockey, K.M., Frey, E.L., & Sakimoto, S.E.H., 2002, Ancient846
lowlands on Mars, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(14), 1384, doi:10.1029/2001GL013832.847
Frey, H.V., 2006, Impact constraints on the age and origin of the lowlands of Mars,848
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08S02, doi:10.1029/2005GL024484.849
Garvin, J.B., Sakimoto, S.E.H., Frawley, J.J., Schnetzler, C.C., & Wright, H.M., 2000,850
Topographic evidence for geologically recent near-polar volcanism on Mars, Icarus, 145,851
648-652.852
Ghatan, G.J., & Head, J.W., 2002, Candidate subglacial volcanoes in the south polar853
region of Mars: Morphology, morphometry, and eruption conditions, J. Geophys. Res.854
- Planets, 107(E7), 5048, doi:10.1029/2001JE001519.855
Greeley, R., & Iversen, J.D., 1985, Wind as a geological process: On Earth, Mars, Venus856
and Titan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.857
Gisler, G., 2009, Simulations of the explosive eruption of superheated fluids through858
deformable media, Mar. Petrol. Geol., in press.859
Hartmann, W.K., 2005, Martian cratering 8: Isochron refinement and the chronology of860
Mars, Icarus, 174(2), 294-320.861
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 43
Hauber, E., van Gasselt, S., Chapman, M.G., & Neukum, G., 2008, Geomorphic evidence862
for former lobate debris aprons at low latitudes on Mars: Indicators of the Martian863
paleoclimate, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 113(E2), E02007, doi:10.1029/2007JE002897864
Horgan, B.H., Bell, J.F., Dobrea, E.Z.N., Cloutis, E.A., Bailey, D.T., Craig, M.A., Roach,865
L.H., & Mustard, J.F., 2009, Distribution of hydrated minerals in the north polar region866
of Mars, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 114, E01005, doi:10.1029/2008JE003187.867
Head, J.W., & Kreslavsky, M.A., 2002, Northern lowlands of Mars: Evidence for868
widespread volcanic flooding and tectonic deformation in the Hesperian Period, J. Geo-869
phys. Res. - Planets, 107(E1), 5003, doi:10.1029/2000JE001445.870
Head J.W., Marchant, D.R., & Kreslavsky, M.A., 2008, Formation of gullies on Mars: Link871
to recent climate history and insolation microenvironments implicate surface water flow872
origin, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803760105.873
Holt, J.W., et al., 2008, Radar sounding evidence for buried glaciers in the southern874
mid-latitudes of Mars, Science, 322, 1235-1238.875
Ingebritsen, S.E., Sanford, W.E., & Neuzil, C.E., 2006, Groundwater in geologic processes,876
2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.877
Kadish, S.J., Head, J.W., Barlow, N.G., & Marchant, D.,R 2008, Martian pedestal craters:878
Marginal sublimation pits implicate a climate-related formation mechanism, Geophys.879
Res. Lett., 35, L16104, doi:10.1029/2008GL034990.880
Kangi, A., 2007, The role of mud volcanoes in the evolution of Hecate Tholus Volcano on881
the surface of Mars, Acta Astronautica, 60, 719-722.882
Kite, E.S., Matsuyama, I., Manga, M., Perron, J.T., & Mitrovica, J., 2009, True polar883
wander driven by late stage volcanism and the distribution of paleopolar deposits on884
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 44 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Mars, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 280, 254-267.885
Kneissl, T., & Neukum, G, 2008, New Investigations of Possible Volcanic Edifices at the886
Martian North Pole - First Results, LPSC 39, 1319.887
Kopf, A.J., 2002, Significance of mud volcanism, Rev. Geophys., 40(2), 1005,888
doi:10.1029/2000RG000093.889
Kreslavsky, M.A., & Head, J.W., 2000, Kilometer-scale roughness of Mars: Results from890
MOLA data analysis, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 105(E11), 26695-26711.891
Kreslavsky, M.A., & Head, J.W., 2002, Northern lowlands of Mars: Evidence for892
widespread volcanic flooding and tectonic deformation in the Hesperian Period, J. Geo-893
phys. Res. - Planets, 107(E1), 5003, doi:10.1029/2000JE001445894
Kreslavsky, M.A., & Head, J.W., 2003, North-south topographic slope asymmetry on895
Mars: Evidence for insolation-related erosion at high obliquity, Geophys. Res. Lett.,896
30(15), 1815, doi:10.1029/2003GL017795.897
Langford, R.P., 2003, The Holocene history of the White Sands dune field and influences898
on eolian deflation and playa lakes, Quaternary International, 103, 31-39.899
Langevin, Y., Poulet, F., Bibring, J.-P., & Gondet, B., 2005, Sulfates in the North Polar900
Region of Mars Detected by OMEGA/Mars Express, Science, 307, 1584-1586.901
Limonov, A.F., Woodside, J. and Ivanov, M.K. (Editors), 1994, Mud volcanism in the902
Mediterranean and Black Sea and shallow structure of the Eratostene seamount. UN-903
ESCO Reports in Marine Science, 64, 173 pp.904
McInnis, D., Sakimoto, S.E.H., & Grosfils, E.B., 2007, Modeling Martian thermokarst905
subsidence with magmatic melting of permafrost, Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 38, 2422.906
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 45
McKenzie, D., & Nimmo, F. 1999, The generation of Martian floods by melting permafrost907
above dykes, Nature 397 ,231-233, 1999.908
Mumma, M.J., Villaneuva, G.L., Novak, R.E., Hewegama, T., Bonev, B.P., DiSanti, M.A.,909
Mandell, A.M., & Smith, M.D., 2009, Strong release of methane on Mars in northern910
summer 2003, Science, 323, 1041-1045.911
Mueller, W.U., Stix, J.B., White, J.D.L., Corcoran, P.L., Lafrance, B., & Daigneault, R.,912
2008, Characterisation of Archean subaqeous calderas in Canada: Physical volcanology,913
carbonate-rich hydrothermal alteration, and a new exploraiton model, in Gottsmann,914
J., & Marti, J., Caldera Volcanism, Analysis, Modelling and Response (Developments915
in Volcanology: Volume 10), Elsevier.916
Murchie, S.M., et al., 2009, A synthesis of Martian aqueous mineralogy after one Mars917
year of observations from the Mars Reconnaisance Orbiter, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets,918
E00D06, doi:10.1029/2009JE003342.919
Mustard, J. F., C. D. Cooper, & M. K. Rifkin, 2001, Evidence for recent climate change on920
Mars from the identification of youthful near-surface ground ice, Nature, 412, 411-414.921
Mustard, J.F. et al., 2008, Hydrated silicate minerals on mars observed by the Mars922
Reconnaissance Orbiter CRISM instrument, Nature, 454, 305-309.923
Neumann, G.A., et al., 2004, Crustal structure of Mars from gravity and topography, J.924
Geophys. Res. - Planets, 109(E8), doi:10.1029/2004JE002262.925
Niles, P.B., & Michalski, J., 2009, Meridiani Planum sediments on Mars formed through926
weathering in massive ice deposits, Nature Geosci. 2, 215-220.927
Oehler, D.Z., & Allen, C.C., 2009, Mud volcanoes in the Martian lowlands: Potential928
windows to fluid-rich samples from depth, Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 40, abstract number929
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 46 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
1034.930
Okubo, C., & Schultz, R.A., 2006, Variability in Early Amazonian Tharsis stress state931
based on wrinkle ridges and strike-slip faulting, J. Struct. Geol., 28, 2169-2181.932
Parsons, R.A., & Nimmo, F., 2009, North-south asymmetry in Martian crater slopes, J.933
Geophys. Res. - Planets, 114, E02002.934
Phillips, R.J., et al., 2008, Mars North Polar Deposits: Stratigraphy, Age, and Geody-935
namical Response, Science, 320, 1182-1185.936
Poulet, F., Bibring, J.-P., Mustard, J.F., Gendrin, A., Mangold, N., Langevin, Y., Arvid-937
son, R.E., Gondat, B., & Gomez, C., 2005, Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for938
early martian climate, Nature, 438, 623-627.939
Putzig, N.E., et al., in press, Subsurface structure of Planum Boreum from Mars Recon-940
naissance Orbiter Shallow Radar soundings, Icarus.941
Schorghofer, N., 2007, Dynamics of ice ages on Mars, Nature, 449, 192.942
Shuster, D.L., & Weiss, B.P., 2005, Martian surface paleotemperatures from ther-943
mochronology of meteorites, Science, 309, 594-600.944
Skinner, J.A., & Tanaka, K.L., 2007, Evidence for and implications of sedimentary di-945
apirism and mud volcanism in the southern Utopia highland lowland boundary plain,946
Mars, Icarus, 186, 41-59.947
Skinner, J.A., & Mazzini, A., 2009, Martian mud volcanism: Terrestrial948
analogs and implications for formational scenarios, Marine & Petroleum Geology,949
doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.02.006950
Smith, P.H., et al., 2009, H2O at the Phoenix landing site, Science, 325, 58-61.951
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 47
Stewart, S.A., & Davies, R.J., 2006, Structure and emplacement of mud volcano systems in952
the South Caspian Basin, Bulletin of the American Associaton of Petroleum Geologists,953
90, 753-770.954
Sullivan, R. et al., 2008, Wind-driven particle mobility on Mars: Insights from Mars955
Exploration Rover observations at ‘El Dorado’ and surroundings at Gusev Crater, J.956
Geophys. Res. - Planets, 113, E06S07, doi:10.1029/2008JE003101.957
Stofan, E.R., Anderson, S.W., Crown, D.A., & Plaut, J.J., 2000, Emplacement and com-958
position of steep-sided domes on Venus, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26757-26771.959
Swarbrick, R.E., Osborne, M.J., & Yardley, G.S., 2002, Comparison of overpressure mag-960
nitude resulting from the main generating mechanisms, in Huffman, A., & Bowers, G.961
(eds.), Pressure regimes in sedimentary basins and their prediction, Memoir 76, Tulsa,962
OK: Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol..963
Somoza, L., et al., 2003, Seabed morphology and hydrocarbon seepage in the Gulf of Cadiz964
mud volcano area: Acoustic imagery, multibeam and ultra-high resolution seismic data,965
Marine Geology, 195, 143-176.966
Tanaka, K.L., Banerdt, W.B., Kargel, J.S., & Hoffman, N., 2001, Huge, CO2-charged967
debris-flow deposit and tectonic sagging in the northern plains of Mars, Geology, 29(5),968
427-430.969
Tanaka, K.L., Skiner, J.A., Hare, T.M., Joyal, T., and Wenker, A., 2003, Resurfacing his-970
tory of the northern plains of Mars based on geologic mapping of Mars Global Surveyor971
data, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 108(E4), 8043, doi:10.1029/2002JE001908.972
Tanaka, K.L., 2005, Geology and insolation-driven climatic history of Amazonian north973
polar materials on Mars, Nature, 437, 991-994.974
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 48 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Tanaka, K.L., 2006, Mars’ North Polar gypsum: Possible origin related to Early Amazo-975
nian magmatism at Alba Patera and aeolian mining, Fourth Mars Polar Science Con-976
ference, abstract no. 8024.977
Tanaka, K.L., Skinner, J.A., and Hare, T.M., 2005, Geologic map of the Northern Plains978
of Mars, USGS Scientific Investigations Map 2888.979
Tanaka, K.L., et al., 2008, North polar region of Mars: Advances in stratigraphy, structure,980
and erosional modification, Icarus, 196, 318-358.981
Wang, C.-Y., Manga, M., & Andrews-Hanna, J., Can freezing cause floods on Mars?,982
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L20202, doi:10.1029/2006GL027471.983
Watters, T.R., et al., 2006, MARSIS radar sounder evidence of buried basins in the984
northern lowlands of Mars, Nature, 444, 905-908.985
Warner, N. H., & J. D. Farmer, 2008, The origin of conical mounds at the mouth of986
Chasma Boreale, J. Geophys. Res. - Planets, 113, E11008, doi:10.1029/2007JE003028987
Wilson, L., Head, J.W., & Parfitt, E.A., 1992, The relationship between the height of a988
volcano and the depth to its magma source zone - a critical reexamination, Geophys.989
Res. Lett., 19(13), 1395-1398.990
Zuber, M.T., et al., 1998, Observations of the North Polar Region of Mars from the Mars991
Orbiter Laser Altimeter, Science, 282, 2053-2060.992
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 49
Table 1. Domes. n.m. = not measured993
994
Dome ID Summit coordinates Area (km2) Volume (km3) ∆z (m) Moat? Central peak? Peak-marginal pit? Concentric rings?
1 74.8N 167.1W 4.1 x 103 2.7 x 101 390 - Y Y Y
2 74.2N 163.6W 1.9 x 103 9.3 x 101 495 Y Y Y Y
3 73.6N 161.0W 1.8 x 103 1.1 x 102 395 - ? - -
4 73.9N 159.4W 1.6 x 103 1.1 x 102 420 - Y Y -
5 73.5N 157.8W 1.9 x 103 1.2 x 102 449 Y Y - Y
6 74.1N 157.4W 1.9 x 103 1.6 x 102 595 ? Y Y Y
7 75.4N 156.0W 1.3 x 103 1.4 x 102 511 ? Y Y ?
8 75.9N 155.0W 1.8 x 103 3.1 x 102 501 - ? - Y
9 76.1N 153.7W 2.4 x 103 3.2 x 102 581 - Y Y Y
10 75.6N 143.1W 5.8 x 103 4.6 x 102 604 Y - - Y
11 74.7N 151.2W 3.6 x 103 2.8 x 102 554 Y Y - Y
12 73.6N 152.2W 2.2 x 103 1.8 x 102 376 Y Y - Y
13 72.8N 151.9W 2.6 x 103 1.7 x 102 432 Y - - -
14 72.6N 150.9W 9.9 x 102 -1.3 x 101 335 Y - - Y
15 73.2N 149.0W 3.0 x 103 1.4 x 102 420 Y Y Y Y
16 72.4N 149.1W 1.2 x 103 1.9 x 101 394 Y Y - Y
17 73.3N 144.0W n.m. n.m. 404 Y - - -
18 75.0N 141.3W 2.5 x 103 2.4 x 102 523 Y - - -
19 71.1N 146.9W 6.2 x 103 1.1 x 101 203 Y Y - -
20 73.8N 169.1W 4.3 x 103 3.6 x 102 516 Y Y Y Y
21 72.1N 172.0W 1.9 x 103 5.2 x 101 407 Y ? - Y
22 79.1N 178.5W 1.5 x 103 3.4 x 101 342 - Y Y ?
23 78.7N 157.3W 1.1 x 103 8.5 x 101 374 Y Y Y Y
24 79.4N 154.3W 8.4 x 102 1.0 x 102 424 ? Y - -
25 79.1N 162.6W 7.7 x 102 6.9 x 101 304 ? - - ?
26 78.0N 176.6W 7.2 x 102 9.8 x 101 418 Y Y ? Y
27 79.2N 174.9W n.m. n.m. 387 - ? ? ?
28 76.0N 172.7W 5.4 x 102 6.9 x 100 333 A A A A
29 75.6N 167.0W 9.3 x 102 6.1 x 101 435 A A A A
Total Σ = 5.4 x 104 Σ = 3.6 x 103 432 16(+4?)/29 17(+4?)/29 10(+2?)/17 16(+4?)/29
s.d. 92 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
995
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 50 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Figure 1. Regional context of the Scandia Tholi, all of which lie within the inner black
box shown in more detail in Figure 2. North polar stereographic projection. Elevation scale
saturates at -4000 m (red) and - 5000 m (white). The ‘Borealis back-basin’ is the lozenge-shaped
depression centered near 200E. White cross labelled PHX corresponds to the Phoenix landing site.
The orange line bounds the gypsum region of Fishbaugh et al. [2007]. It is almost coextensive
with the region of 10% or greater band depth at 1.9 µm mapped by Horgan et al. [2009]. High
gypsum concentrations are only found within the Olympia Undae erg.
Figure 2. The domefield located on Figure 1. Inner black box corresponds to region shown
in more detail in Figure 3. Topography has been detrended by subtracting a 2nd-order global
polynomial interpolation from the region shown. 256 ppd MOLA gridded data. Numbers cor-
respond to the domes discussed in the text and listed in Table 1. Domes 23-29 encircle a large
ridge-bounded depression (one of the Scandia Cavi).
Figure 3. Directions of elongation of all 29 domes in catalogue (blue), and of the subset of
domes with aspect ratios (long axis / short axis) > 1.2 (21 domes, red). Domes are elliptical,
and preferentially oriented E-W. However, some domes are oriented WSW-ESE. The preferred
direction of dome elongation does not correspond to the continuation of the strike of dykes
radiating from Alba Patera as mapped by Tanaka [2005].
a)
b)
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 51
c)
Figure 4. High-resolution images of the domes. a) Context for high-resolution images. Close-
up of Domes 12 and 13 (see Figure 2). Image is 100 km across. Background is MOLA shaded relief
over color topography, with color scale running from -4502m (red) to -4899m (purple). Grayscale
is mosaic of CTX images P22 9515 2535, P22 9581 2531, and P16 007142 2529. Illumination is
from the top, and arrowed features are discussed in the text. b) Mosaic of CTX frames showing
possible layers (black arrows) exposed in E flank of Dome 13. Image is 16.1 km across. Moat
is at lower left, dome interior at upper right. c) HiRISE subframe (PSP 006931 2530) showing
patterned ground, boulder clusters, and frost in a dome interior. Image is 2.1 km across.
Figure 5. Radially-averaged profiles of the large moated domes. Solid lines are the mean of
radially-averaged profiles. Asterisks joined by gray lines to profiles correspond to the highest
point anywhere within the dome, at their correct normalized radial distances. Similarly, open
circles joined by gray lines to profiles correspond to the lowest point anywhere in the dome.
Thick lines highlight moats where these are visible; domes 3 and 4 appear to have moats in the
averaged profiles, but not in the raw data. Profiles are offset from each other by 200 m, such that
2100 m should be subtracted from the highest point on the radially-averaged profile of Domes 1,
11, and 21 to give the true elevation above the background plains.
Figure 6. Azimuthally averaged (median) profiles of domes. The centers of the domes are
on the left, their edges at right. Each horizontal strip corresponds to the azimuthally-averaged
profile of one dome. Warm colors correspond to high elevations, cool colors to low. Elevations
are expressed as a percentage of the total elevation range on each profile. Asterisks correspond
to peak elevation on the averaged profile, and circles to the lowest elevation on the averaged
profiles. Vertical lines are at intervals of 5 % of the total elevation range on each profile.
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 52 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Figure 7. Regions-of-interest for slope-aspect analysis (Section 3.2). Gray flat-toned areas are
ice outliers mapped by Tanaka [2005]. White cross corresponds to the Phoenix landing site. The
orange line surrounds the gypsum region of Fishbaugh et al. [2007]. Background is MOLA 256
ppd shaded relief.
Figure 8. a) Results of slope-aspect analysis for the test region. Blue lines correspond to ±1
standard deviation envelope, calculated for 1◦ bins. Moderately steep slopes are significantly more
likely to be S-facing. b) Results of slope-aspect analysis for the control region. Blue is standard
deviation calculated for 1◦ bins. There is no statistically significant correlation between slope and
S-facing versus N-facing aspect. More detailed analysis (not shown) shows an overabundance of
slopes facing ∼120◦ or ∼300◦ in the control region, consistent with the regional tectonic trend
(wrinkle ridges).
Figure 9. Results of PEDR analysis. Blue symbols correspond to the test region, red symbols
to the control region, and black symbols to the conservatively-defined test region (excluding
ridge-bounded depressions). The solid lines correspond to the number of N-facing slopes, and
the dot symbols correspond to the number of S-facing slopes. All plotted MOLA track segments
have length < 450m.
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 53
Figure 10. Summary of spectral analysis. OMEGA cube 0917-2: a) Regions selected for mean
spectra extraction of the domes, identified by colors, draped over a grayscale MOLA topographic
map (elevation range -5979 m, black, to -3546 m, white). The brown patch near 67◦ N is a control
region. (b) Corresponding mean spectra (colors link each spectrum to a dome), which are very
similar. The main differences can be explained by albedo variations. The spectral ratio of dome
13 to the background plains (brown patch in panel a) is also presented, showing no diagnostic
bands of hydrated minerals above the noise level. CRISM cube 000BACF: (c) 1.1 µm albedo,
cube location is box outlined in white on the OMEGA cube (a)). (d) Spectral ratio of an outcrop
(red) to a reference region (brown patch in panel c). CRISM’s higher resolution does not show
any diagnostic spectral features on the dome, confirming that the spectral homogeneity extends
to small spatial scale.
Figure 11. Sidescan sonar image of TREDMAR mud volcano, the Eastern Mediterranean,
TTR-3 (1993) data (slightly modified from Limonov et al. [1994]). A clearly defined collapse moat
frames the volcano. Note: multiple pinnacles and heights characterize the volcano similarly to
the multiple peaks and rugged surface seen on Mars images. Arrows 1 and 3 indicate the moat,
while arrows 2 and 4 indicate the pinnacles and displaced blocks.
Figure 12. Multibeam bathymetry from the Barbados accretionary prism, Earth. Mud
volcanoes are shown in pink, and stratified sedimentary uplifts are outlined with a white dotted
line. Yellow is shallow and blue is deep, and the stratified sedimentary uplifts have a relief of up
to 150m, measured from the surrounding seafloor. Water depth is ∼ 2.5 km. This is a slightly
modified and corrected version of Figure 5 in Deville et al. [2006]; we are grateful to Eric Deville
(Institut Francais du Petrole) for supplying this figure.
a)
b)
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 54 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
Table 2. Truth table.996
997
Observation Pingos /kames /kettles
Effusive‘pancake’domes
Tuyas Explosivesilicatevolcanism
Mudvolcanism
Moats possible flexural yes, thermalerosion
encirclingresurgentdomes
yes,subsidence
Internal collapsefeatures
yes no no unexpected yes
Central peaks sometimes no yes yes yesNested rises andslumps
sometimes no no rare yes
Jumbled interiorw/ multiple pitsand peaks
yes no no maybe yes
Subdued, consis-tent relief
maybe no no maybe yes
Elliptical shape w/preferred orienta-tion
yes yes maybe yes yes
Susceptible to sub-limation or aeolianerosion
yes not very not very yes, ifunweldedtuff
yes
Volatile content yes no no no yesConsistent withpresent day Te?
yes no no no yes
Formation condi-tions restricted toN Plains
requires pastice
no requires thickice
no yes
Only mafic miner-als in spectrum
maybe yes yes yes hydratedmineralswould beexpected
Boulder-rich layers no no yes yes possible
998
Te = elastic thickness of lithosphere.999
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES X - 55
Table 3. OMEGA and CRISM data used.1000
1001
Instrument Image ID Date Ls (◦) Resolution (km/px) Image width (pixels)OMEGA 0917 2 6 Oct 2004 97.2 3.860 128
0928 1 9 Oct 2004 98.6 1.946 640991 0 27 Oct 2004 106.5 3.454 641007 1 31 Oct 2004 109.5 5.700 128
CRISM 000093F9 7 Jan 2008 14.0 ≥ 0.036 360x32000009B30 29 Jan 2008 24.6 ≥ 0.036 360x3200000BACF 21 Jul 2009 101.5 ≥ 0.018 540x640
1002
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T
X - 56 KITE ET AL.: MARS POLAR MOATED DOMES
c)
Figure 13. To show how azimuthally-averaged profiles are generated for moated domes. A
mask is picked manually around the dome (a), and the center of extracted topography is found
by minimizing the weighted standard deviation of the resulting profiles (b). The long axis and
short axis of the dome are defined using the radial profiles. Finally the mean (solid line) and
median (dotted line) elevations are plotted, together with the 1 standard deviation envelope
(dash-dotted lines) (c).
D R A F T September 30, 2009, 8:22pm D R A F T