chapter two: good reasoning review applying ethics: a text with readings (10 th ed.) julie c. van...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chapter Two:Good Reasoning
Review
Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10th ed.)Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent BarryCengage Learning/Wadsworth
![Page 2: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is the purpose of an argument?
To show that the conclusion is true OR
To show that it is reasonable to accept the conclusion as true
![Page 3: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Deductive arguments
What is a deductive argument? – An argument that claims to follow truth-
preserving rules
What is a truth-preserving rule?– If the first two statements (premises)
are true, the conclusion will be true
![Page 4: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Inductive Arguments
What is an inductive argument?– An argument in which supporting
statements, or evidence, aim to show that it is reasonable to accept that the conclusion is true
What is a good inductive argument?– A warranted argument
![Page 5: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Fallacies
What is a fallacy?– an unreliable means of arguing, one that does not
provide good reason for accepting the argument’s conclusion
What is a formal fallacy?– Use of invalid deductive rules
What is an informal fallacy?– Unreliable strategies that people tend to use
![Page 6: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Informal Fallacies
What is an Ad Hominem Argument?– An attack on the opponent rather than the
opponent’s argument
What is a Faulty Analogy?– Misuse of argument by analogy (an argument that
two things alike in some respects must be alike in other respects)
What is Questionable Authority?– Supporting a conclusion by relying on the judgment
of someone who is not a reliable authority
![Page 7: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
More informal fallacies
What is begging the question?– Assuming a premise you want to prove
What is equivocation?– Implicit reliance on two different meanings of the
same word to reach a conclusion
What is hand waving?– Claiming something is true (or false) because
everyone knows it
![Page 8: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
More informal fallacies
What is hasty generalization?– Reaching a general conclusion form a sample
that is biased or too small What is appeal to ignorance?
– Arguing that a claim is true (or false) because we have no evidence proving otherwise
What is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?– “after this, therefore because of this”– Claiming that one thing is caused by another
because it follows the other
![Page 9: Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082518/5697c0201a28abf838cd27fb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
More informal fallacies
What is a red herring?– An irrelevant issue introduced to distract attention
from the issue at hand What is a slippery slope?
– Assuming an action will inevitably lead to an unwanted outcome as a result of the small steps that inevitably will follow
What is a straw man?– A distortion of an opponent’s actual position to
make it easier to attach