chapter fifteen - weebly
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
C H A P T E R F I F T E E N
THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANSTHE GOD OF JEW AND GENTILE
P hilip Mel anchthon, one of the great theological minds of the Reformation, de-scribed Romans as âan outline and com-pendium of all Christian doctrine,â and its in-terpretation has often been driven by theological interests and debates. Indeed, until quite recently Romans had been read primarily as an essay in propositional theology, and in-terpreters often lost sight of the concrete and specific circumstances and interests that called this letter into existence. Attempting to ab-stract the timeless theology of Romans, Chris-tians have repeatedly broken off fellowship with other Christians over the interpretation of minute aspects of this letter, for example, the question of predestination versus free will, the degree of human depravity, the nature of
âsavingâ faith, and so forth. A tragic irony emerges when we consider that in Romans, Paul provides his fullest treatment of the way God has brought people of diverse heritage and practice together into the one body of the church, and he also gives several chapters of practical advice for preserving unity in the midst of this diversity.
Since the reading of Romans has been framed more by theological inquiry and debate than by listening to the text, the reader may have to work harder to hear Romans itself over the cacophony. Many of us have been brought up in a certain tradition of what Romans has to mean; thus we are caught in the endless cycle of reading into Romans what we have been
taught to find there, which confirms in the end that Romans means exactly what we thought all along. But the mystery of God is always more difficult to domesticate than our tradi-tions tend to admit. After Paul has said all he has to say about the mystery of Godâs right-eousness, even he can still only exclaim, âHow unsearchable are Godâs decisions and how un-fathomable Godâs ways! âFor who has known the Lordâs mind? Or who has been Godâs coun-selor?ââ (Rom 11:33-34). It is perhaps more ap-propriate to do as Paul advises and simply
âstand in aweâ (Rom 11:20) rather than presume to systematize and codify this mystery. For Paul, standing in humble awe of God will allow Jew and Gentile to worship together in the one body (Rom 15:7-13), whereas the propositional approach to Romans has contributed to the fracturing of this body.
THE SETTING AND PURPOSES OF ROMANSRomans has long been regarded as a timeless treatise, not an application of the gospel aimed to achieve particular goals (whether to affect the situation in local congregations or to attain its authorâs particular ends). It was viewed almost as the distilled essence of Paulâs thought, as recently as GĂŒnther Bornkamm, who called it Paulâs âlast will and testament.â1 Presumed to
1GĂŒnther Bornkamm, âThe Letter to the Romans as Paulâs Last Will and Testament,â Australian Biblical Review 11 (1963â1964): 2-14 (repr. in The Romans Debate, ed. Karl P. Donfried, rev. ed. [Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1991], 16-28).
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 2: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
the ePistLe to the romans 527
be âPaulineâ in its purest form, Romans became the key to reading all of his other letters. Several breakthroughs have significantly advanced our understanding of Romans. The first of these came when students of the letter began to see that Romans is not without at least some con-tingent purpose and occasion; it seeks to achieve certain goals like every other of Paulâs letters. A second important breakthrough came when scholars began to recapture the cor-porate dimension of Romans, which had long been overlooked in the history of reading Romans as a treatise on how the individual
âgets saved.â2 A third breakthrough came as Romans (along with Galatians) ceased to be privileged above all the other letters in the dis-cussion of Pauline theology, with the result that the theological contributions of the Corinthian and Macedonian letters are now honored equally in recent attempts to ascertain âthe the-ology of Paul.â
The Christian communities in Rome. Rome had a large Jewish population (estimated at forty to fifty thousand),3 in part because the city itself naturally drew people from the prov-inces, in part because Pompey the Great had
2A groundbreaking essay in this regard was Krister Stendahlâs âThe Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the Westâ (HTR 56 [1963]: 199-215), which demonstrated how Western individualism and preoccupation with âinternalâ matters, such as the feelings of guilt and acceptance, have skewed the reading of Romans. Stendahlâs conclusion that Romans was written to explain how two ethnic bodies come together in the new people of Godâhow Gentiles come in without disinheriting the Jewsâhas opened up new vistas into every aspect of Paulâs theology and the exegesis of Ro-mans and Galatians in particular. His insistence that Ro-mans is not at all about how an individual gets saved, how-ever, has been justly critiqued as another instance of a pendulum swinging back too far in the opposing direction. (See Douglas J. Moo, Encountering the Book of Romans [Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002], 28; Peter Stuhlm-acher, Revisiting Paulâs Doctrine of Justification [Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2001], 44-52). A reading that holds together Paulâs interest in people both as individuals and as ethnic groups will achieve the best balance.
3Harry J. Leon, The Jews of Ancient Rome, rev. ed. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1995), 135-36.
Figure 15.1. Two views of the excavations of the Roman Forum, the center of the political and religious life of Rome and her empire. The three columns in the back center of the upper picture are the remains of a temple to Castor and Pollux; the paved ruins studded with the bases of columns are the remains of the Basilica Julia, a major judicial center. In the lower picture, we see eight large columns of the façade of the temple of Saturn and the three remaining columns from the façade of the temple of the Divine Vespasian and Titus. The photos are taken from the archive building, behind and above which sat the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus. (Photos by author)
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 3: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
528 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT
brought many thousands of Jews to Rome as slaves after his military intervention in Jeru-salem in 63 BCE. Many of these were liberated thereafter, with the result that most Jews in Rome would have occupied the status of slaves or freed persons. They were not nearly so large nor so unified as the Jewish community in Al-exandria, but they nevertheless provided an ample seedbed for the Christian congregations.
The origins of Roman Christianity remain largely unknown. Jews converted elsewhere to Christianity, perhaps returning from a pil-grimage to Jerusalem (like those present for Pentecost in Acts 2:10), perhaps moving to the
âBig Oliveâ for business opportunities (like Aquila and Priscilla of Pontus), brought the gospel to Rome, and began making disciples among Jews and Gentile adherents of the syna-gogues.4 Christianity in Rome thus probably had a strong Jewish character and a deep root-edness both in the Old Testament (LXX) tradi-tions and the practice of Jewish customs. It took shape, as elsewhere, in the form of house churches (see Rom 16:5, 14-15), though in the hyperovercrowded city of Rome (whose popu-lation density in some districts exceeded that of modern Calcutta) we might also need to en-vision small congregations meeting in the cramped tenements of Romeâs nonelite renters.5
Since they were so largely intertwined, one event in the life of the Jewish community of Rome no doubt had a great impact on the Christian community there. In 49 CE Claudius expelled at least some segment of the Jewish population from Rome on account of a distur-bance in that community over a person whom Suetonius, a Roman historian of the early second century, calls âChrestusâ (Life of Claudius 25). While it remains possible that someone actually
4Brendan Byrne, Romans, Sacra Pagina 6 (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1996), 10. Paul speaks of Junia and An-dronicus as âapostlesâ (Rom 16:7), perhaps knowing of their role in evangelizing in Rome.
5Special attention to this setting is given in Robert Jewett, Ro-mans, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007), 53-55, 62-69.
named Chrestus (a common-enough slave name) was fomenting riot, it seems more his-torically plausible that Suetonius has misinter-preted Christos, the unfamiliar Greek word for Messiah, as Chrestus. Given the response of Jews elsewhere in the eastern empire to the procla-mation of Jesus as the Messiah of Israel, we should expect many Jews in Rome also to have reacted strongly and openly against mission-aries of the new movement. The disruption of the peace led to strong measures on the em-perorâs part to quell the shameful breach of civic unity in the empireâs capital.6 If the trouble within the Jewish community was brewing as a reaction to the initial proclamation of the gospel, this would point to the beginnings of the Roman Christian community in 47 or 48 CE. If they were responding, however, to later trends in this movementâperhaps the erosion of support for the synagogue among proselytes and God-fearers, perhaps the rise of less law-observant strains of Christianityâthen the beginnings of the Roman church could be pushed back much further. The emperorâs judgment, moreover, pro-vides additional evidence for Christianity being regarded as a wholly intra-Jewish phenomenon by Roman authorities at this point.
The church was strong enough to survive the expulsion of leading Jewish Christians from Rome (this is when Aquila and Priscilla, for example, left Rome and relocated in Corinth; Acts 18:2), and it continued to grow in their ab-sence. After Claudiusâs death the edict of exile was rescinded, and returning Jewish Christians came home to a predominantly Gentile church. There may have been some tension between the returnees and the Christians they left behind (as well as the newer Gentile converts made in their absence).7 For five or more years the church had continued to grow and evolve
6See further E. Mary Smallwood, The Jews Under Roman Rule (Leiden: Brill, 1981), 211-16; James D. G. Dunn, Romans 1â8, WBC 38A (Waco, TX: Word, 1988), liii; Joseph Fitzmyer, Ro-mans, AB 33 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1993), 31-32, 77; Jewett, Romans, 60-61.
7Byrne, Romans, 12; Jewett, Romans, 59, 61.
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 4: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
the ePistLe to the romans 529
without their direct influence and leadership, possibly in directions that some Jewish Chris-tians would oppose (e.g., regarding the level of commitment to Judaistic customs among newer Gentile converts). Both sides now had to adjust: Jewish Christians to a church that was no longer under their direction, Gentile Chris-tians to a group of estranged sisters and brothers whose practices some found difficult to integrate and whose objections were difficult to understand or honor. Paulâs word in Romans would indeed have served as a âword on targetâ to such tensions within the community.
The Roman congregations continued to grow. Neroâs actions against the Christians in 64 CE (see Tacitus, Ann. 15.44) testify to the
size and visibility of this movement in Rome, to the tendency now to view it as something distinct from Judaism, and to the growing ani-mosity felt against this movement by the popu-lation of Rome in general.8 Paul wrote Romans, therefore, at something of a point of transition for this community, and much of its argumen-tation can be understood as an attempt to pre-serve the Roman churchâs unity and internal solidarity through this transition.
Paulâs personal goals for Romans. That Romans was not written to be a âlast will and
8For more detailed discussion of the early history of Roman Christianity, see Fitzmyer, Romans, 25-39; Jewett, Romans, 53-74.
Figure 15.2. The interior of the Roman Colosseum, completed under Titus (emperor 79â81 CE). A floor was originally constructed over the maze of passageways now visible in the center, where gladiators, animals, and other entertainments were prepared prior to their entrance into the arena. The arena could even be flooded for the reenactment of naval battles. (Photo by author)
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 5: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
530 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT
testament,â a closing argument distilling the essence of Paulâs theology, is seen in that Paul does not regard Romans as his swan song but rather as a hinge between one phase of his mission and the next.9 Writing from Corinth or its westbound port, Cenchreae, sometime be-tween 55 and 58 CE,10 Paul sees himself standing at a juncture in his missionary en-deavors. Having successfully proclaimed the gospel from Jerusalem to Illyricum (the province northwest of Macedonia and Greece, reaching as far as northeast Italy), Paul senses that his work in the east is now complete (Rom 15:19) and now looks ahead to new fields for sowing the gospel, namely, westward from Italy through Gaul to Spain (Rom 15:20-24). Perhaps Paul entertained the hope that he might con-tinue thence through North Africa, Cyrenaica, and Egypt, closing the circle of the oikoumenÄ, the civilized world, returning to Jerusalem perhaps just in time for the parousia and the deliverance of Israel at the Last Day, having thoroughly fulfilled his commission as âapostle to the nations.â
Paul therefore wishes to gain the Roman Christiansâ support for the next phase of this mission (to âreap some harvestâ among them and to be âsent onâ by them, Rom 1:13; 15:24).11
9Byrne, Romans, 9.10Paul can be confidently located in Corinth/Cenchreae if
Rom 16 is taken as integral to the letter. Gaius and Erastus, both known from Corinth, are able to send their greetings with Paul to Rome (Rom 16:23), and, moreover, it is Phoebe of Cenchreae who will be delivering the letter to the Christians in Rome and perhaps making herself avail-able for clarifications and answering other questions about this âPaul,â hence also the word of commendation for her, asking that she be accorded an appropriate reception (Rom 16:1). There is a marked preference for a date between 56 and 58 CE. See Dunn, Romans 1â8, xliii; C. E. B. Cranfield, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, ICC (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975), 1:12-16; Byrne, Romans, 8; Fitzmyer, Romans, 85-88; Arland Hultgren, Paulâs Letter to the Romans: A Commentary (Grand Rapids; Eerdmans, 2011), 569-71; Jewett, Romans, 22-23.
11A. J. M. Wedderburn, The Reasons for Romans (Philadel-phia: Fortress, 1991), 43, 92-139; Dunn, Romans 1â8, lv; Byrne, Romans, 10. The Greek verb propempĆ used in Rom 15:24 is often used in the sense of âfacilitate (someone
The well-established Christian community at Rome would make an ideal base of support for beginning a new mission. Paul is therefore at pains to establish a relationship with this church that he has not founded. We can see how Paul begins to construct a âprior rela-tionshipâ with the Roman Christians in Romans 1:8-10, 13. Both in his prayers and his intentions, the Roman Christians have already been very much a part of Paulâs life, a very real presence to him. Thus he subtly begins to lay a foundation for their future partnership with each other. Paul intends to bring âsome spir-itual giftâ to strengthen them, but he also looks forward to being encouraged by their faith-fulness as well (Rom 1:11-12). This provides a politic hint of the reciprocity relationship Paul wishes to initiate with the Roman congrega-tions.12 They cannot contribute now to the col-lection, as did the other Gentile churches that Paul founded, but they can still contribute to the spread of the gospel.
In order to enter into partnership with Paul, they need to know precisely what he stands for. This prompts him to present himself and his message to this congregation, not only to
âremindâ them of the gospel (now given its dis-tinctive Pauline accent) that they accepted but also to âset the record straightâ about his own commitment to a transformed life, his law-free
elseâs) travel,â as in 1 Cor 16:6, 11; 2 Cor 1:16; Titus 3:13; 3 Jn 6 (so Hultgren, Romans, 6). Jewett (Romans, 74-79, 87-91) provides a brilliant analysis of the conditions of the prov-ince of Spain at this time, the challenges these conditions posed to Paulâs mission, and what specific help Paul would have needed from Roman Christians in order to facilitate his work there.
12Romans 1:12 is not a âdiplomatic rephrasing of his relation to them,â correcting Rom 1:11 (Fitzmyer, Romans, 75). Far from being a step backward, it is a step forwardâcalling for a response of faithfulness within the relationship that Paul is initiating. Part of the problem is the persistence of mistranslation of this verse. It is not âto be mutually en-couraged by each otherâs faith, both yours and mine,â but âto be mutually encouraged by our faith in [or trust in, or faithfulness toward] one another.â Faith (pistis) here would have more of its usual meaning of trust or reliability in a business partnership.
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 6: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
the ePistLe to the romans 531
gospel having been subject to misrepresen-tation elsewhere (see Rom 3:8, the clearest evi-dence that Paul knows about prejudice against his message and mission).13 Here is one indi-cation that Romans is not a simple, detached presentation of Paulâs gospel but one designed to overcome potential doubts about the char-acter of Paul and his gospel so that the Roman Christians will accept him as a missionary apostle worthy of their full support. Since the doubts focus on issues such as how the Christian is supposed to live a moral life without becoming Torah observant, this takes Paul more into the topics that arose in the situ-ations in Antioch and Galatia, hence the abun-dance of connections between Galatians and Romans. (Unfortunately, this has also tended to lead to the privileging of these issues as central Pauline concerns, to the detriment of the contributions of Paulâs other letters to a fuller understanding of his âgospel.â)
A second purpose concerns Paulâs more im-mediate travel plans, as he prepares to depart for Jerusalem with the relief funds he has col-lected from his converts in Achaia and Mace-donia (Rom 15:25-29).14 This is an act of charity and kindness, but it also serves as a symbol for the reciprocity and partnership be-tween the Pauline churches and the Jerusalem church: âfor it pleased them [Paulâs Gentile churches], and they are their debtors. For if the Gentiles received a share in their [the Jeru-salem Christiansâ] spiritual things, they [the Gentile Christians] owe it to them to be of service to them in physical thingsâ (Rom 15:25-27). Immediately following this, however, Paul expresses concern for how the collection will be received by the Jerusalem community
13Byrne, Romans, 9, 18-19; Hultgren, Romans, 18-20.14These verses inform us that during his third visit to Corinth
(see 2 Cor 13:1) Paul successfully resolved the remaining tensions between himself and his congregation, and that Paulâs directions in 2 Cor 8â9 had in fact been carried out, since the Christians in Achaia have indeed contributed to the collection for the poor in Judea.
(Rom 15:30-32).15 This collection effort repre-sents, for Paul, the mutual acceptance of and the solidarity between the Diaspora-Gentile churches and the Judean churches. The funds he takes to Jerusalem are the firstfruits of the eschatological pouring in of the wealth of the nations to Jerusalem. The grateful acknowl-edgment and acceptance of this gift from Paul on the part of the Jerusalem and Judean churches would signify an affirmation of peace and unity between the churches he has founded and the churches that emerged as a result of the Jewish mission. In light of the conflicts in Antioch and Galatia, and in light of the growing hostility against Paul in non-Christian Jewish and Jewish-Christian circles (see Acts 21:20-22), Paul was understandably concerned that the unity of the church would be sealed through the acceptance of this of-fering (and fearful of the implications of the rejection of the collection by the leaders of the Jerusalem church). He therefore asks the Roman Christians, who have not had the op-portunity to contribute to this collection, to begin to act as Paulâs partners even before he visits them by supporting him in prayer (Rom 15:30-32), which Paul believes to be truly ef-fective and not just a casual and clichĂ©d re-quest made in religious circles.
Paulâs pastoral goals for Romans. Some scholars have argued that Romans is not con-nected with circumstances or problems in-ternal to Roman churches.16 However, others
15Wedderburn, Reasons for Romans, 37-41; Dunn, Romans 1â8, lvi. See also Dieter Georgi, Remembering the Poor: The History of Paulâs Collection for Jerusalem (Nashville: Abing-don, 1992), 33-42, 117-20; Keith F. Nickle, The Collection: A Study in Paulâs Strategy (Naperville, IL: Alec R. Allenson, 1966), 111-29; Bengt Holmberg, Paul and Power: The Struc-ture of Authority in the Primitive Church as Reflected in the Pauline Epistles (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980), 35-43.
16See, for example, C. H. Dodd, who calls it âa waste of timeâ to try to deduce internal conditions from this letter (The Epistle of Paul to the Romans [New York: Harper & Broth-ers, 1932], xxviii, xxxi); Robert J. Karris, âRomans 14:1â15:13 and the Occasion of Romans,â CBQ 25 (1973): 155-78
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 7: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
532 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT
have argued (I think more persuasively) that Romans is written to address situation-specific circumstances and achieve specific goals within those circumstances. We have already seen how this is the case with regard to Paulâs aspirations and anxieties; it seems likely to have been true also with regard to circum-stances facing the Roman church.17 How would Paul get such information about a church he has not yet visited? The list of greetings in Romans 16, if it was indeed original to Romans, reveals that Paul was not unknown to the church in Rome. Through his own travels he had met quite a few members of the Roman congregation, either while they were living abroad (for example, Priscilla and Aquila, alongside whom Paul worked in Corinth) or before they came to settle at Rome. Paul was also not the only person to travel or write letters in the ancient world, and his personal acquaintances in Rome might easily have pro-vided him with firsthand information con-cerning the condition of the Roman congrega-tions prior to his writing Romans.18
The aspect of the Roman Christiansâ situ-ation most clearly in view is found in Romans 14:1â15:13, where Paul seeks to nurture harmony and mutual respect among the âstrongâ and the
(also 65-84 in Donfried, Romans Debate). More recently, Arland Hultgren (Romans, 16-18, 503) has suggested that Paulâs advice in Rom 14â15 represents not the apostleâs in-tervention in actual divisions within the Roman church but rather his supplying the âcounselâ that the Roman Christians would already know, approve, and follow as a means of further winning their support.
17Thus, rightly, Karl P. Donfried, âFalse Presuppositions in the Study of Romans,â in Romans Debate, 103.
18Dunn, Romans 1â8, 1:xlv. Paulâs advice about paying taxes in Rom 13:6-7, for example, is often read as an indication of such detailed information about current issues in Rome. About the time Romans was written, people in Rome were actively protesting the extortionate collection of âindirectâ taxes by the publicani, such that the matter was brought before the emperor and senate, who eventually intervened to correct this abuse. Paul is thus counseling Christians to provide a model of orderliness and submissiveness to au-thorities in a situation of restlessness and turmoil. (See Tacitus, Ann. 13.50-51; Dunn, Romans 1â8, xliii-xliv, liv; Fitzmyer, Romans, 35-36, 78-79.)
âweak.â19 While it is true that Paul had used these terms to address a specific situation in Corinth, it does not follow that Paul adds this admonition here simply because it might be useful, even though he has no knowledge of a specific tension among Roman Christians, for the discussion concerns not only eating meat versus abstaining from all meats (as potential objects of pagan sacrifice) but also the obser-vation of special days versus the nonobservance of a sacred calendar. The tension reflects the known facts about Roman Christianity, namely, (1) its strong beginnings within the orbit of the synagogue, and (2) with the expulsion of the Jews (and possibly the influx of less Judaistic forms of the Way), the relaxation of Jewish ob-servances among some sector of the population. This is not to say that the âstrongâ are entirely and uniformly Gentile Christians as opposed to
âweakâ Jewish Christians, since Priscilla and Aquila would surely share Paulâs mind with regard to meat and calendrical observances, whereas some Gentile Christian converts who had first been converts to Judaism, or been con-verted through a more Judaistic Christianity, could easily maintain scruples about foods sacrificed to idols and the need to observe the sabbath and other holy days.20
The âstrongâ might scorn the âweakâ for their enslavement to their scruples (or perhaps
âsuperstitionâ), while the âweakâ could accuse the âstrongâ of neglecting piety and not living in line with true religion. Paulâs exposition of
19See further Wedderburn, Reasons for Romans, 44-65; Fitzmyer, Romans, 33. Francis Watson (Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986], 94-98) goes a bit further, suggesting that Paulâs ac-tual intent was to win over the weak to the position of the strong (not to the point of abandoning any distinctive practice but to the point of agreeing in theory that obser-vance of the Torah is now a matter of conscience rather than divine mandate) and thus consolidate Roman Chris-tianity as âPaulineâ Christianity. This has significant merit, as such a theoretical shift seems prerequisite to the âweakâ accepting the âstrong,â which may be just as much an issue as the converse.
20Wedderburn, Reasons for Romans, 64-65; Jewett, Romans, 71.
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 8: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
the ePistLe to the romans 533
the gospel in Romans 1â11 impinges directly on such a situation, as Romans 15:7-13, the scrip-tural celebration of the bringing together of Jew and Gentile in the one church, shows. Paulâs carefully balanced efforts both to negate the ethnic privileges of Jews and to exclude a boastful or superior attitude among Gentile converts come to bear here on nurturing an at-titude of tolerance across the lines of âstrongâ and âweak,â putting Christâs welcome of all persons ahead of personal judgments. Re-solving these tensions is also ancillary to Paulâs personal ambitions, for a unified and harmo-nious churchâespecially one that has been helped along to harmony by Paulâs timely inter-ventionâwill make for a stronger and more committed base of support for his future mis-sionary endeavors.
GENRE AND STRUCTURERomans falls naturally into the major category of âletter.â It has the standard form for an epis-tolary opening (âSender to Recipient[s], greetingsâ), but it is substantially expanded, as Paul was accustomed to do (Rom 1:1-7). The final chapters also include the normal topics covered in a letter closingâindication of travel plans, concluding greetings, and postscript. Within this letter frame the body of Romans incorporates several subgenres21 within a framework commonly called a âdiatribe.â This form is common in popular philosophical teaching in urban centers and is found espe-
21For example, testimony lists (chains of Scripture quota-tions; see Rom 3:10-18; 9:25-29; 15:9-12), hymns, and a miniletter of recommendation (Rom 16:1-2). See further Fitzmyer, Romans, 91-92.
Figure 15.3. Worship of the family lares and genii, the protective spirits of the family line, was a typical feature of Roman domestic religion. Here we see a frescoed lararium with painted depictions of these ancestral spirits from an ancient tavern in Pompeii. (Photo by author)
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.
![Page 9: CHAPTER FIFTEEN - Weebly](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022012020/6168975cd394e9041f70e9d5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
534 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT
cially in the Discourses or Dissertations of Epictetus.22 The speaker would present his or her case in a vivid style, engaging the hearers through direct address, paradoxes, rhetorical questions, asking questions and then providing answers, and dialogues with imaginary third parties (straw adversaries or âstraight menâ whose objections are answered or counterposi-tions dismantled). This form was especially ef-fective because it allowed the speaker to both address likely objections and prevent the hearers from drawing false conclusions. An audience is only won over if the secret objec-tions they harbor in their minds are defused. For this reason an effective speaker will show an awareness of likely objections to what is being said or questions prompted by what is being proposed and answer them up front.
Romans contains a lengthy, coherent, unified argument concerning the relationship of Jew and Gentile to God and each other in the one body of Christ. Within this argument some seams or stages are easily discernible; in other places it is difficult to know where to draw the lines between discrete pieces of the argument. An overall sketch of the letter might resemble the following:
1. Epistolary prescript (Rom 1:1-7), an-nouncing the theme of the letter: Paul preaches to bring about the âobedience of faithâ among the Gentile nations (Rom 1:6)
2. Thanksgiving (Rom 1:8-15), developing Paulâs past and future partnership with the Roman Christians
3. Thesis, or proposition (Rom 1:16-17): The gospel brings Godâs saving power to life in all who trust, whether Jew or Greek, re-vealing Godâs righteousness âfrom faith/faithfulness to faith/faithfulnessâ
22See Stanley K. Stowers, The Diatribe and Paulâs Letter to the Romans, SBLDS 57 (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981); Thomas Schmeller, Paulus und die âDiatribeâ: Eine verglei-chende Stilinterpretation (MĂŒnster: Aschendorff, 1987); Fitzmyer, Romans, 91; Jewett, Romans, 25-27.
4. The solidarity of Jew and Gentile under sin (Rom 1:18â3:20)
5. The solidarity of Jew and Gentile under Godâs favor in Christ (Rom 3:21â4:25)
6. Conclusion and transition (Rom 5:1-21)a. Romans 5:1-11 celebrates Godâs ini-
tiative in bringing human beings back into a state of favor, closing off the theme of wrath introduced in Romans 1:18 with the assurance of future salvation from that wrath in Romans 5:9 on account of the recon-ciliation effected in Christ.
b. Romans 5:12-21 reinforces the ne-gation of the Jew-Gentile distinction before God by viewing all of hu-manity as either âin Adamâ under sin or âin Christâ under righteousness.
7. Clarifications of possible questions (Rom 6:1â8:39)a. What are the ethical implications of
this new life in Christ âunder graceâ and without âlawâ (Rom 6:1â7:6)? This section takes up the slanderous misrepresentations of Paul cited in Romans 3:5-8 that his gospel en-courages sin.
b. What is the role of the law in regard to sin (Rom 7:7-25)? This section ad-dresses questions raised by his treatment of the law in Romans 3:20; 4:15; 5:13, 20; 6:14; 7:6.
c. How does Paulâs gospel uphold the law rather than overthrow it (Rom 8:1-39)? Romans 8 looks forward now through the life in the Spirit of Christ to the redemption of all creation and the glorification of the believers in Christ, thus reversing the condition of wrath (and the promise of eschato-logical wrath) with which the ar-gument began in Romans 1:18.
deSilva, David A.. 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament : Contexts, Methods and Ministry Formation. Westmont: InterVarsity Press. Accessed November 29, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central.Created from dtl on 2020-11-29 15:51:10.
Cop
yrig
ht ©
201
8. In
terV
arsi
ty P
ress
. All
right
s re
serv
ed.