chapter 7 - rate of return analysis click here for streaming audio to accompany presentation...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 7 - Rate of Return Analysis
Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation (optional)
EGR 403 Capital Allocation Theory
Dr. Phillip R. RosenkrantzIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department
Cal Poly Pomona
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 2
EGR 403 - The Big Picture• Framework: Accounting & Breakeven Analysis• “Time-value of money” concepts - Ch. 3, 4• Analysis methods
– Ch. 5 - Present Worth– Ch. 6 - Annual Worth– Ch. 7, 8 - Rate of Return (incremental analysis)– Ch. 9 - Benefit Cost Ratio & other techniques
• Refining the analysis– Ch. 10, 11 - Depreciation & Taxes– Ch. 12 - Replacement Analysis
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 3
Three Major Methods of Economic Analysis
• PW - Present Worth
• AW - Annual Worth
• IRR - Internal Rate of ReturnIf P = A(P/A, i, n)Then (P/A, i, n) = P/ASolve for (P/A, i, n) and look up interest in Compound Interest Tables
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 4
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)• The interest rate paid on the unpaid balance of a
loan such that the payment schedule makes the unpaid loan balance equal to zero when the final payment is made. Ex: P = $5000, i = 10%, n = 5
Year Principal Prin. Paid Int Paid Payment1 5000.00 818.99 500.00 1318.992 4181.01 900.89 418.10 1318.993 3280.13 990.97 328.01 1318.994 2289.15 1090.07 228.92 1318.995 1199.08 1199.08 119.91 1318.996 0.00 0.00
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 5
Calculating Rate of Return
• The IRR is the interest rate at which the benefits equal the costs. IRR = i*PW Benefit - PW Cost = 0
PW Benefit/PW Cost = 1
NPW = 0
EUAB - EUAC = 0
PW Benefit = PW Cost
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 6
Calculating IRR - Example 7-1
• PWB/PWC = 1
• 2000(P/A, i, 5)/8200 = 1
• (P/A, i, 5) = 8200/2000 = 4.1
• From Table, IRR = 7%
3.9938%
4.1007%
4.2126%
(P/A,i,5)Interest rateFrom Compound Interest Tables
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 7
Calculating IRR - Example 7-2
Sometimes we have more than one factor in our equation. When that happens we cannot solve for just one factor.
If we use: EUAB - EUAC = 0100 + 75(A/G, i, 4) - 700(A/P, i, 4) = 0
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 8
Calculating IRR - Example 7-2 (cont’d)• No direct method for calculating. Use trial and error
and iterate to get answer.• Try i = 5%:
100 + 75(A/G, 5%, 4) - 700(A/P, 5%, 4) = + 11
+ 11 is too high. The interest rate was too low
• Try i = 8%100 + 75(A/G, 8%, 4) - 700(A/P, 8%, 4) = - 6
- 6 is too low. The interest rate was too high
• Try i = 7%100 + 75(A/G, 8%, 4) - 700(A/P, 8%, 4) = 0
Therefore IRR = 7%
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 9
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3• Example 7-3 shows a series of cash flows that does not match any of our known patterns. We must use trial and error. • Using NPW = 0, suppose we start with i = 10% . NPW = + 10.16, which is too high. • Using i = 15%, NPW = - 4.02. IRR is between 10% & 15%• The iterations may be graphed and the true IRR will be indicated at the point where the NPW curve = 0.
Yr CF0 - 1001 + 202 + 203 + 304 + 405 + 40
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 10
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3 (Cont’d)
• We can use linear interpolation to find estimate the point where the curve crosses 0.
• IRR = i* = 10% + (15%-10%)[10.16/(10.16 + 4.02)] = 13.5%
• This is a linear interpolation of a non-linear function so the answer is slightly inaccurate, but good enough for decision making here (after all, the guesswork in our future cash flows introduces uncertainty in the analysis).
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 11
Calculating IRR - Example 7-3 (Cont’d)
-1002030204040
13.47%
• To get an exact answer, we can use the IRR function in EXCEL• Select the IRR function from the fx icon. • Block the column on the spreadsheet that has the cash flows for all years.• The function returns the IRR.
=IRR(A1:A6)
The IRR function in EXCEL allows you to evaluate the return of investments very easily
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 12
Calculating IRR for a Bond - Example 7-4a
Bond Costs and Benefits:Purchase price = $1000Dividends = $40 every six monthsSold after one year for $950
Calculation of Periodic interest rate & IRR:m = 2 compounding periods/year1000 = 40(P/A, i, 2) + 950(P/F, i, 2)By trial and error and interpolation i* 1.5%IRR Nominal rate = 2 x 0.015 = 0.03 (3%)IRR Effective rate = (1 + 0.015)2 - 1 = 0.0302 (3.02%)
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 13
Example 7-4a EXCEL Solution
Period Buy/sell Dividend Total0 -1000 -10001 40 402 950 40 990
1.52% periodic3.04% nominal3.06% effective
• Use IRR function to find periodic IRR (i)• Find nominal using r = i * m• Use EFFECT function to find effective interest rate
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 14
Rate Of Return (ROR) Analysis
• Most frequently used measure of merit in industry.
• More accurately called Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 15
Calculating ROR• Where two mutually exclusive alternatives will
provide the same benefit, ROR is performed using an incremental rate of return (ROR) on the difference between the alternatives.
• You cannot simply choose the higher IRR alternative.
Choose lower-cost alternative
ROR MARR
Choose higher-cost alternative
ROR MARR
DecisionTwo-alternative situation
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 16
The Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR)
• The MARR is a minimum return the company will accept on the money it invests
• The MARR is usually calculated by financial analysts in the company and provided to those who evaluate projects
• It is the same as the interest rate used for Present Worth and Annual Worth analysis.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 17
ROR on Alternatives With Equivalent Benefits
YearCash flow - alternative A (Leaseco)
Cash flow - alternative
B (Saleco)
Cash flow - alternative
B - A
0 -$1,000.00 -$2,783.00 -$1,783.001 $200.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.002 $200.00 $1,200.00 $1,000.003 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $0.004 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $0.005 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $0.00
IRR/period 48.72% 32.60% 8.01%
Example 7-5: Consider the lease vs. buy situation. MARR = 10%• Leasco: Lease for five years for 3 annual payments of $1000 each• Saleco: Purchase up front for $2783• Both alternatives have a $1200/year benefit for 5 years
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 18
Example 7-5 (Cont’d)
• Cannot simply pick the highest IRR if alternatives have different investment costs• Must examine the incremental cash flows!!• Subtract the cash flows for the “Lower First Cost” alternative from the cash flows of the “Higher First Cost” alternative to obtain the “Incremental Cash Flow” or • Compute the IRR on the incremental cash flow. This is the ROR.• For this problem the ROR is 8.01% which is MARR, therefore choose the lower cost alternative.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 19
Example 7-5 (Cont’d)
• Q. Why did we do this?
• A. Both alternatives were acceptable compared only to the MARR. Since either alternative will work, the question is whether we want to spend the additional $1783 to go from the lower cost to the higher cost alternative. The benefit for doing so is the savings of two years of $1000 lease payments. Essentially we are getting an 8.01% return on that $1783 investment. The company can get 10% ROR on its money elsewhere, so reject the increment. That is, spend $1000 now on Leaseco and invest the other $1783 for a higher return.
EGR 403 - Cal Poly Pomona - SA9 20
Analysis Period• Just as in PW and AW analysis the analysis period must
be considered:– Useful life of the alternative equals the analysis period.
– Alternatives have useful lives different from the analysis period.
– The analysis period is infinite, n =
7-10
For an example of that uses a common multiple of the alternate service lives, see Example 7-10. EXCEL would be useful here because of the irregularity of the cash flows.