chapter 6: validity

18
VALIDIT Y ANTONIO TI PLES ED 450 MS. SOLEDA D CAMACHO

Upload: antoniotiples329

Post on 22-Nov-2014

768 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

This presentation was created for ED 450 Assessment and Evaluation. This is an education course offered at the Northern Marianas College.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 6: Validity

VALID

ITY

ANTONIO

TIP

LES

ED 450

MS. SOLE

DAD CAMACHO

Page 2: Chapter 6: Validity

BELLWORK

True or False:

“This is a valid test.”

Page 3: Chapter 6: Validity

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Students will learn how ‘validity’ is used in reference to assessments

Students will learn about three types of validity evidences

Page 4: Chapter 6: Validity

NORMS

Please ask questions

Page 5: Chapter 6: Validity

WARM UP ACTIVITY

Let’s Take a Test about Me

Page 6: Chapter 6: Validity

My favorite color is red. T F

I don’t know how to swim. T F

I have a dog named Fido. T F

My watch is real gold. T F

Page 7: Chapter 6: Validity

CONTENT-RELATED EVIDENCE OF VALIDITY

Refers to the adequacy with which the content of a test represents the content of the curricular aim

about which inferences are to be made.

Two Approaches:

1.Developmental Care

2.External Reviews

Page 8: Chapter 6: Validity

DEVELOPMENTAL CARE

Employ a set of test-development procedures focused on assuring that

the curricular aim’s content is properly reflected in the assessment procedure

itself.

Page 9: Chapter 6: Validity

EXTERNAL REVIEWS

Assembling of judges who rate the content appropriateness of a given test in relationship

to the curricular aim the test allegedly represents

Page 10: Chapter 6: Validity

THE ISSUE OF ALIGNMENT

Norman Webb of the University of Wisconsin’s Method of Determining Alignment

Categorical concurrence: Are the same or consistent categories used in both curricular expectations and

assessments?

Depth-of-knowledge consistency: To what extent are the cognitive demands of curricular aims and assessments the

same?

Range of knowledge correspondence: Is the span of knowledge reflected in curricular aims and assessments

the same?

Balance of Representation: To what degree are different curricular aims given equal emphasis on the assessments?

Page 11: Chapter 6: Validity

CRITERION-RELATED EVIDENCE OF VALIDITY

Collected only in situations where educators are using an assessment procedure to predict how well students will perform on some subsequent

criterion variable.

Page 12: Chapter 6: Validity

CONSTRUCT RELATED EVIDENCE

Measuring what’s hidden

Gathered through a series of studies

Three Approaches to Collecting Construct Related Evidence of Validity

1.Intervention Studies2.Differential-Population Studies3.Related-Measures Studies

Page 13: Chapter 6: Validity

INTERVENTION STUDIES

We hypothesize that students will respond differently to the

assessment instrument after having received some type of treatment (or

intervention)

Page 14: Chapter 6: Validity

DIFFERENTIAL-POPULATION STUDIES

We hypothesize that individuals representing distinctly different

populations will score differently on the assessment procedure under

consideration.

Page 15: Chapter 6: Validity

RELATED-MEASURES STUDIES

We hypothesize that a given kind of relationship will be present between students’ scores on the assessment device we’re scrutinizing and their

scores on a related or unrelated assessment device.

Convergent Validity (+ +)

Discriminant Evidence (+ -)

Page 16: Chapter 6: Validity

SANCTIONED AND UNSANCTIONED FORMS OF VALIDITY EVIDENCE

Face Validity

• the appearance of a test seems to coincide with the use to which the test is being put

Consequential Validity

• refers to whether the uses of test results are valid

Refer to Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

Page 17: Chapter 6: Validity

RELIABILITY/VALIDITY

Valid score-based inferences almost certainly guarantee that consistent test results are present.

Vs.

Consistent test results almost certainly guarantee that valid score-based inferences are present

Evidence of valid score-based inferences almost certainly requires that consistency of measurement is present.

Page 18: Chapter 6: Validity

WHY DID I JUST SIT HERE AND LEARN ALL THIS?

Give serious thought to the content of an assessment domain being represented by a test.

There is value in having a colleague review your tests’ content.

At least you know about the other forms of validity evidence.

Validity does NOT reside on the test itself.