chapter 6 image formation theory · 2019. 11. 6. · chapter 6 image formation theory in this...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 6 Image Formation Theory
In this chapter, we will discuss the mathematical formalism of image formation
process and relevant image resolution issue.
6.1 Intensity Impulse Response
First, let us consider an imaging system as depicted below. The object is
illuminated by an incoherent light source.
Since Maxwell’s equations, which govern the propagation of light in free
space, are linear and the optical system is stationary, the following principles can
be invoked to facilitate the description of image formation:
∎ Linearity: Assuming 1 2( ') ( ')f x and f x are two sources lying on the object plane
and the optical system images 1 1( ') ( )f x into g x , 2 2( ') ( )f x into g x , respectively, then
the system will produce 1 2( ) ( )a g x b g x for the linearly combined source
1 2( ') ( ')a f x b f x .
∎ Stationarity: If the system maps 1 1( ') ( )f x g x , then it will also map
1 0 1 0( ' ') ( )f x x g x x .
Based on the above properties, we can further draw the following conclusions:
(i) Let ( )s x be the image for a point source on the object plane, i.e., ( ') ( )x s x ,
an arbitrarily distributed intensity distribution on the object plane can be
expressed as ( ') ( ") ( ' ") "obI x f x x x dx .
(ii) From the linearity and stationarity of the system, the image distribution
formed on the image plane will be ( ) ( ') ( ') 'imI x f x s x x dx .
Here ( )s x is called as the point spread function (psf), which is the intensity
impulse response, or the point diffraction pattern of the optical system.
6.1.1 The Expression of Intensity Impulse Response
Refer to the figure
.
and recall that the effect of a thin lens is to impose a phase factor
2exp[ (2 )]j k f on the incident wave with a transmission factor ( )A . Based on
the Huygens-Fresnel principle, the optical field on the image plane ( , )x x y can
be expressed as
2
1 2
2
1( ) ( ') ( ) '
j kjkr j k sf
im ob
e eU x K U x A e d dx
r s
.
By using the paraxial approximation at the far-field
2
2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
( ' ) ( ' ) ' 2 ' | | ( ' )2 '
2
'
'
( ) ( ) 2 | | ( )
Rr x x
x
R
x
R
R x R
s x RR
x R x
,
the optical field distribution at the image plane can be simplified to be
2
1 2
1 1 1( ) '
( )'
('
1
2')
( ) ( ') ( ) ''
x xj
jk R R
i
kR
j
R
k
m b
R f
o
ReU x K U x A e e d dx
RR
.
With the paraxial approximation of ' 'x z and x z f , we achieve
2
1 2
1 1 1( )
2 '
'( )
'( ) ( ') ( ) '
j k
z
x xjk
zz f
bz
im oU x K U x A e e d dx
,
where1 1 1
( ) 0'z z f
on the image plane. And finally we have
2 1
'2 ( )( )
'( ) ( ') ( ) ' ( ) ( )'
x xjjk
z z
x
zim ob obU x K U x A e dx d K U A e d
z
,
where 2 ( ) '
'( ) ( ') ''
j xz
ob obU U x e dxz
.
For a point source of ( ') ( ')obu x x , 2 ( ) '
'( ) ( ') ' 1'
j xz
obU x e dxz
, we then
obtain 2
2 ( )
( ) ( )j
zim
x
U x K A e d
.
By defining 2
2 ( )* 2( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
x
zim i
j
ms x U x U x K A e d
, which indicates that
the intensity impulse response s(x) can be determined directly from the aperture
transmission function A(), which is also called pupil function.
6.1.2 Image Formation in Terms of the Intensity Impulse Response
To facilitate further discussion, let us start with an 1-D case with a
rectangular aperture transmission function ( )A
.
Based on the previous result,2 2 2
2 ( )
( ) 4 ( )a j
z
a
x axs x e d a sinc
f
, indicating
that when a bar object of '
( ')0 '
o
ob
I x bI x
x b
is imaged, then its image will be
2 2
22
'( ) ( ') ( ') ' 4 ( ) '
24 (2 ) (2 ) { }
2
x b
im ob ox b
o o
axI x s x x I x dx a I sinc dx
f
f x b x b a Ca I I
a C C
S S S S,
where C denotes the spot size of the intensity impulse response
#2 22
fC f
a , and
2
0( ) ( )
2
x ux sinc du S .
Let us define 2bC
(the ratio of object dimension and image spot size)
.
A series of images taking by an imaging apparatus with different #f (i.e.,
different C ) are shown below
.
6.1.3 Resolution in Terms of the Intensity Impulse Response
Now consider the image of two points ( ') [ ( ' ) ( ' )]ob oI x I x b x b in 1-D case
We calculate the image distribution
2 2
2 2 2
( ')( ) 4 [ ( ' ) ( ' )] ( ) '
( ) ( )4 ( ) ( )
im o
o
ka x xI x a I x b x b sinc dx
z
ka x b ka x ba I sinc sinc
z z
,
where 2 2
2 ( )2( ) 4 ( )
xa j
z
a
kaxs x e d a sinc
z
.
Rayleigh proposed a resolution criterion for an incoherent image by choosing a
separation 2 'rb of the two sinc2 functions such that the central maximum of one
coincides with the first minimum of the other. The resulting image intensity
distribution has a small minimum at the center of the two-point images
,
with #2 '
2r
zb f if z f
a
.
For partially coherent imaging, we can choose the separation of the two sinc2
functions such that
2
02( ) 0
im xI xx
. Note
2 2( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )im
ka x b ka x bI x Sinc Sinc
z z
and ( ) ( )Sinc x Sinc x . The
resulting criterion (i.e., the Sparrow criterion) then becomes
2.6062 '
2s
zb
a
.
For 2-D case, 2 2
1( ) 4 [2 ( ) ( )]kax kax
s x a Jz z
; where a is the aperture radius of
the optical system. The corresponding resolution criteria become
2.9762 ' 1.22 , 2 '
2 2or r s
z zb b
a a
.
6.2 Image Formation Described by the Intensity Transfer Function
Image formation described by the Intensity Transfer Function is usually more
suitable for the imaging analysis of complicated objects. Consider an object with a
cosinusoidal intensity distribution as ( ') 1 cos(2 ')ob oI x A x , where A describes
the modulation amplitude, and o the spatial frequency of the object. In view that
s(x) is a real function, the image distribution formed on the image plane becomes
2 ' 2 ' 2 ( ')
2
2 2
2
( ) ( ') ( ') '
[1 ( )] ( ) '2
[ ( ) ( ) ( )] ( )2 2
(0) [ ( ) ( ) ]2
(0) Re[ ( ) ]
( )(0) 1
o o
o o
o
im ob
j x j x j x x
j x
o o
j x j x
o o
j x
o
o
I x I x s x x dx
Ae e s e d dx
A As e d
As s e s e
s A s e
ss A
cos(2 ( )(0)
o oxs
.
Visibility of the periodic image pattern can be displayed as
( )( )
(0)
o
o
sV A A H
s
,
where ( )oH is the optical transfer function.
Consider a general object, which the object intensity distribution can be described
by 2( ) ( ) j x
ob obI x I e d , with ( )obI being the object spectrum.
Then
2
2 ' 2 '( ')
2
( ) ( )
( ') ( ') ' [ ( ) ][ ( ') '] '
( ) ( )
j x
im im
j x j x x
ob ob
j x
ob
I x I e d
I x s x x dx I e d s e d dx
I s e d
.
Thus, ( ) ( ) ( )im obI I s . Note
22
( ) ( )x
jzs x A e d
2 2 '* 2
*
( ) [ ( ) ][ ( ') ']
( ') ( ' ) '
x xj j
j xz zs A e d A e d e dx
A A z d
,
implying that the un-normalized optical transfer function is given by the
unnormalized autocorrelation of the aperture function with its complex conjugate.
6.2.2 Image Formation in Terms of the Optical Transfer Function
To facilitate further discussion on the optical transfer function, let us consider
the following simple aperture function
1
( )
0
a
A
a
.
*( ) ( ') ( ' ) 's A A z d = the measure of the overlapping area as the
aperture is slided across itself by z : ( ) 2 2 [1 ]2
a z
a
zs d a z a
a
.
By normalizing ( )s , we deduce the optical transfer function to be
#
| ( ) | | | 2 1( ) (1 )
(0) 2
s z aH as
s a f f
.
By defining #
2
zz
a ,
#( ) (1 )H z .
Some examples are given below for further illustration:
∎ Image of a Ronchi Ruling
Consider an image of a Ronchi ruling with incoherent light, the ruling is
described by
1 ' 4
( ') 0 4 ' 3 4
1 3 4 '
ob
x
I x x
x
and ( ' ) ( ')ob obI x I x .
Then,2( ) ( ) ( ') ( ') 'j x
im im obI x I e d I x s x x dx , where ( ) ( ) ( )im obI I H .
For the object with Ronchi ruling
2 ' 22 2( ) ( ') ' [ ] [ ] ( )
4 4 4 4
j x j n
ob ob
n n
nI I x e dx sinc e sinc
and #( ) (1 )H z for
#1 ( )z .
A. If #
1 1
z , only dc terms of the ruling passes through the optical system
described by ( )H , resulting in no intensity variation.
B. If #
1 1 3
z , the resultant image consists of the central order of the sinc
function.
C. #
4 1
z
D. #
6 1
z
The imaging properties were summarized in the following figure:
6.3 Image Formation with Coherent Light
Consider the case that two fields 1( , )U x t and 2 ( , )U x t are superposed on the space-
time point (x, t): 1 2( , ) ( , ) ( , )U x t U x t U x t .
The total intensity becomes *
1 2 12( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( ) ( ) 2Re ( )I x U x t U x t I x I x x ,
where U satisfies the wave equation for a quasi-monochromatic light with
( ) 2 2( , ) ( ) ( )j x j t j tU x t A x e e A x e .
6.3.1 The Imaging Problem with Coherent Light
Note ( , ) ( ', ') ( ') 'im obU x t U x t K x x dx
, where ( ')K x x is the complex
amplitude in the image plane due to a point object, i.e., an amplitude impulse
response of the optical system. The light intensity distribution ( )imI x can be formed
on the image plane
* * *
'( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( ', ') ( ", ') ( ') ( ") ' "im im im ob ob tI x U x t U x t U x t U x t K x x K x x dx dx .
∎ for an incoherent source *
'( ', ') ( ", ') ( ') ( ' ")ob ob t obU x t U x t I x x x ,
* *
2
( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( ') ( ') ( ') '
( ') ( ') ' ( ') ( ') '
im im im t ob
ob ob
I x U x t U x t I x K x x K x x dx
I x K x x dx I x s x x dx
.
∎ for a coherent source,
2
* *( )
(
( ') ( ')
') ( ') '
'( ") ( ") "obm oi b
ob
U x K xUI x K x x dxx
U x K x x dx
x dx
.
6.3.2 Amplitude Impulse Response
Referring to the optical imaging process shown above,
2
2 1
1 2
1 2 1 2
2 1
'
2
.1 1 1
'( ) '( )
( , ) ' ( ) ( ')
' ( ) ( ')
xjks jkr jkf
im ob
paraxial approxi
and yxz z f jkx jky
z z z z
ob
e eU x y K d x d U A x e
s r
K d x d U A x e
.
Let ( ) ( , )obU , therefore
2 2
2
2 [ '( ) '( )]
( , ) ' ' ( ', ')
x yj x y
z z
imU x y K dx dy A x y e
.
In terms of polar coordinates,
2 ( ) cos( )2
0 0
12
00
( , )
22 ( )
22 ( )
2
rja
zim
a
U r K d e d
raJ
r zK J d K araz
z
.
6.3.3 Coherent Imaging Resolution
Consider an imaging process of two point sources ( ) ( )[ ( ) ( )]ob oU U b b
in an optical system
*
1 2 1 2
*
1 2 1 1 2 2
0 1 2 1 1 2 2
( , ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) [ ( ) ( )][ ( ) ( )]
( , )[ ( ) ( )][ ( ) ( )]
ob ob ob
o o
U U
U U b b b b
I b b b b
.
Then *1 1 2 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
2 1 2 1
( , ) ( , ) ( ) ( )im ob
x xx x K K d d
z z z z
, and
2 2 *
1 2 0( ) ( ) ( ') ( ') 2Re ( ' ') ) ), ( (im imI x x x I K x b K x b K x Kb xb bb ,
where 2
1
'z
b b b mz
.
∎ 1-D system
2
( ) 2kax
K x a sincz
.
2 2 2
0
2 2 2 2
( ') ( ) ( ') ( ')( ) 4 [ ] [ ] 2Re ( , )im
ka x b ka x b ka x b ka x bI x a I sinc sinc b b sinc sinc
z z z z
.
(a) Incoherent Limit with ( , ) 0b b
2 2 2
0
2 2
( ') ( ')( ) 4 [ ] [ ]im
ka x b ka x bI x a I sinc sinc
z z
.
Rayleigh Criterion : 2 2
( ') ( ')0,
ka x b ka x b
z z
22 'rb
z
ka .
Sparrow Criterion : 2
2
0
( )0im
x
I x
x
22.6062 's
z
kab .
(b) Coherent Limit with ( , ) 1b b
2 2 2
0
2 2 2 2
( ') ( ') ( ') ( ')( ) 4 [ ] [ ] 2 [ ] [ ]im
ka x b ka x b ka x b ka x bI x a I sinc sinc sinc sinc
z z z z
.
Sparrow Criterion : 2
2
0
( )0im
x
I x
x
24.1642 's
z
kab .
∎ 2-D system
1
22 2
1
2
2
2
( )
ka rJ
z ka rK x a a
ka r z
z
.
4 2 2
0 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
( ') ( ') ( ') ( ')( ) [ ] [ ] 2Re ( , ) [ ] [ ]im
ka r b ka r b ka r b ka r bI r a I b b
z z z z
.
(a) Incoherent Limit with ( , ) 0b b
Rayleigh Criterion : 23.8322 'r
z
kab .
Sparrow Criterion : 22.9762 's
z
kab .
(b) Coherent Limit with ( , ) 1b b
Sparrow Criterion : 24.62 's
z
kab .
6.4 Coherent Imaging: An Example
Consider an edge object such that
0 0( )
0 0ob
II
.
∎ Incoherent Illumination of the Edge
*
2 1 2 1
2 0 0 20
02 1 2
2
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 cos( )
[ ( )] ( )2
im ob
x xI x I K K d
z z z z
kax
I I zx kaxI sinc ka d Si
z z z kax
z
.
∎ Coherent Illumination of the Edge with 1 2( , ) 1
2
*
1 2 1 2
2 1 2 1 2 1
2
2
0
2
( ) ( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1( )
2
im ob ob
x x xI x K K d d I K d
z z z z z z
kaxI Si
z
,
where 0
sin( )
x uSi x du
u . For your reference, the image distribution ( )imI x as a
function of 2x ka z is shown in the following:
The photograph showing the edge patterns with incoherent (a) and coherent
imaging (b) are shown below. The corresponding traces across the edge are
presented on (c) and (d).
(a) (b) (c) and (d)