chapter

35
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter 10

Upload: carol-york

Post on 02-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Chapter. 10. Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter. Section. 10.4. Hypothesis Tests for a Population Proportion. Objectives. Test the hypotheses about a population proportion Test hypotheses about a population proportion using the binomial probability distribution. Objective 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved

Chapter

Hypothesis Tests Regarding a Parameter

10

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved

Section

Hypothesis Tests for a Population Proportion

10.4

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-3

Objectives

1. Test the hypotheses about a population proportion

2. Test hypotheses about a population proportion using the binomial probability distribution.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-4

Objective 1

• Test hypotheses about a population proportion.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-5

Recall:

• The best point estimate of p, the proportion of the population with a certain characteristic, is given by

where x is the number of individuals in the sample with the specified characteristic and n is the sample size.

ˆ p x

n

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-6

Recall:

• The sampling distribution of is approximately normal, with mean and standard deviation

provided that the following requirements are satisfied:

1. The sample is a simple random sample.2. np(1-p) ≥ 10.3. The sampled values are independent of each

other.

ˆ p

ˆ p p

ˆ p p(1 p)

n

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-7

Testing Hypotheses Regarding a Population Proportion, p

To test hypotheses regarding the population proportion, we can use the steps that follow, provided that:

1. The sample is obtained by simple random sampling.

2. np0(1-p0) ≥ 10.3. The sampled values are independent of each

other.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-8

Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. The hypotheses can be structured in one of three ways:

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-9

Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-10

Step 3: Compute the test statistic

Note: We use p0 in computing the standard error rather than . This is because, when we test a hypothesis, the null hypothesis is always assumed true.

z0 ˆ p p0

p0(1 p0)

n

ˆ p

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-11

Step 4: Use Table V to determine the critical value.

Classical Approach

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-12

Classical Approach

Two-Tailed

(critical value)

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-13

Classical Approach

Left-Tailed

(critical value)

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-14

Classical Approach

Right-Tailed

(critical value)

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-15

Step 5: Compare the critical value with the test statistic:

Classical Approach

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-16

Step 4: Use Table V to estimate the P-value.

P-Value Approach

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-17

P-Value Approach

Two-Tailed

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-18

P-Value Approach

Left-Tailed

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-19

P-Value Approach

Right-Tailed

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-20

Step 5: If the P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.

P-Value Approach

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-21

Step 6: State the conclusion.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-22

Parallel Example 1: Testing a Hypothesis about a Population Proportion: Large Sample Size

In 1997, 46% of Americans said they did not trust the media “when it comes to reporting the news fully, accurately and fairly”. In a 2007 poll of 1010 adults nationwide, 525 stated they did not trust the media. At the =0.05 level of significance, is there evidence to support the claim that the percentage of Americans that do not trust the media to report fully and accurately has increased since 1997?Source: Gallup Poll

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-23

Solution

We want to know if p>0.46. First, we must verify the requirements to perform the hypothesis test:

1. This is a simple random sample.

2. np0(1-p0)=1010(0.46)(1-0.46)=250.8>10

3. Since the sample size is less than 5% of the population size, the assumption of independence is met.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-24

Solution

Step 1: H0: p=0.46 versus H1: p>0.46

Step 2: The level of significance is =0.05.

Step 3: The sample proportion is .

The test statistic is then

ˆ p 525

10100.52

z0 0.52 0.46

0.46(1 0.46)

1010

3.83

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-25

Solution: Classical Approach

Step 4: Since this is a right-tailed test, we determine the critical value at the =0.05 level of significance to be

z0.05= 1.645.

Step 5: Since the test statistic, z0=3.83, is

greater than the critical value 1.645, we reject the null hypothesis.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-26

Solution: P-Value Approach

Step 4: Since this is a right-tailed test, the P- value is the area under the standard normal distribution to the right of the test statistic z0=3.83. That is, P-value =

P(Z > 3.83)≈0.

Step 5: Since the P-value is less than the level of significance, we reject the null

hypothesis.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-27

Solution

Step 6: There is sufficient evidence at the =0.05 level of significance to conclude that the percentage of Americans that do not trust the media to report fully and accurately has increased since 1997.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-28

Objective 2

• Test hypotheses about a population proportion using the binomial probability distribution.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-29

For the sampling distribution of to be approximately normal, we require np(1-p) be at least 10. What if this requirement is not met?

ˆ p

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-30

Parallel Example 4: Hypothesis Test for a Population Proportion: Small Sample Size

In 2006, 10.5% of all live births in the United States were to mothers under 20 years of age. A sociologist claims that births to mothers under 20 years of age is decreasing. She conducts a simple random sample of 34 births and finds that 3 of them were to mothers under 20 years of age. Test the sociologist’s claim at the = 0.01 level of significance.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-31

Parallel Example 4: Hypothesis Test for a Population Proportion: Small Sample Size

Approach:

Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses

Step 2: Check whether np0(1-p0) is greater than or equal to 10, where p0 is the proportion stated in the null hypothesis. If it is, then the sampling distribution of is approximately normal and we can use the steps for a large sample size. Otherwise we use the following Steps 3 and 4.

ˆ p

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-32

Parallel Example 4: Hypothesis Test for a Population Proportion: Small Sample Size

Approach:

Step 3: Compute the P-value. For right-tailed tests, the P-value is the probability of obtaining x

or more successes. For left-tailed tests, the P- value is the probability of obtaining x or fewer successes. The P-value is always computed with the proportion given in the null hypothesis.

Step 4: If the P-value is less than the level of significance, , we reject the null hypothesis.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-33

Solution

Step 1: H0: p=0.105 versus H1: p<0.105

Step 2: From the null hypothesis, we have p0=0.105. There were 34 mothers sampled, so np0(1-p0)=3.57<10. Thus, the sampling distribution of is not approximately normal.

ˆ p

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-34

Solution

Step 3: Let X represent the number of live births in the United States to mothers under 20

years of age. We have x=3 successes in n=34 trials so = 3/34= 0.088. We want to determine whether this result is unusual

if the population mean is truly 0.105. Thus,

P-value = P(X ≤ 3 assuming p=0.105 )

= P(X = 0) + P(X =1)

+ P(X =2) + P(X = 3)

= 0.51

ˆ p

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 10-35

Solution

Step 4: The P-value = 0.51 is greater than the level of significance so we do not

reject H0. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of live births in the United States to mothers under the age of 20 has decreased below the 2006 level of 10.5%.