chapter 5 communicator characteristics & persuadability copyright © 2014 pearson education. all...
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 5
CO
MM
UN
I CATO
R C
HARAC
T E RI S
T I CS
& P
E RSU
ADAB
I LI T
Y
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D 1
Prepared by Robert Gass & John Seiter
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
Knowing the right buttons to push
2
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
AGE
Children are easy marks “young children — younger than 8 years — are
cognitively and psychologically defenseless against advertising”
(American Academy of Pediatrics, cited by Strasberger, 2006)
Young children cannot distinguish between advertising and programming content.
By 3 months, 40% of children are watching TV or videos (Lindstrom, 2011)
The average child sees 40,000 commercials per year
3
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
ADVERTISERS TARGET CHILDREN
Advertisers take advantage of children’s naivety junk food ads
alcohol and tobacco ads
sexualization of girls
Media messages sexualize girls and younger and younger ages (APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls, 2010)
Abercrombie and Fitch’s risqué wear for kids
Bratz dolls (mini-skirts, fishnet stockings
Tesco’s “Peekaboo Pole Dancing Kit”
4
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Life stages hypothesis: there is a curvilinear relationship between age a persuadability.
children are more vulnerable Middle-aged persons are less
vulnerable elderly are more vulnerable
Age alone does not make people more gullible, however;
Politeness reduces some seniors’ willingness to hang up on telemarketers
Cognitive impairments (dementia, Alzheimer's) make some seniors more vulnerable
Loneliness, isolation make some seniors more vulnerable
Common scams target the elderly
Telemarketing scams
Lottery and sweepstakes scams
Bank examiner cons
5
ELDERLY
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Gender stereotypes affect persuasion more than actual gender differences
Reinforcement Expectancy Theory Female MDs are expected to
be more communal, nurturing
Male MDs are expected to be more assertive, leader-like
Male MDs can employ more negative strategies than female MDs
Individual differences matter more than gender differences Women are as different from
one another as from men
Cross-Sex Effect Women are more easily
persuaded by males, and vice versa
Goals, plans, and resources affect persuasion more than gender
6
GENDER AND PERSUASION
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Gender differences in persuasion tend to be overlapping, rather than “either-or”
7
GENDER
For any given communication trait, such as assertiveness, the curves for females and males tend to be normal and overlapping
females
males
All these females would be
more assertive
than all these males
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Individualistic cultures value personal autonomy Direct, assertive
persuasion strategies Ads that emphasize
individual benefits, personal success
Rational strategies
Collectivistic cultures emphasize fitting in Indirect, cooperative
persuasion strategies Ads that appeal to group
benefits, harmony Coalitions and gift-
giving
8
CULTURE AND ETHNICITY
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
INFLUENCE STRATEGIES MAY BE CULTURE SPECIFIC
U.S.A. Direct request, assertiveness
People’s Republic of China Anshi: hinting, indirect, implicit
Yo she zuo ze: setting a personal example
Tou qi suo: feeding people what they relish
Columbia
Confiaza: trust or closeness
9
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
INTELLIGENCE
Albert Einstein Vs. Forrest Gump In general, less intelligent people are easier to
persuade (Rhode & Woods, 1992)
But…
Less intelligent people may have more difficulty comprehending the message
simple versus complex messages
Intelligence is not synonymous with knowledge or education on a topic
10
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Self-Esteem
The Trade-off between low and high esteem
Low esteem: more likely to yield, but less likely to follow through
High esteem: less likely to yield, but more likely to follow through
Therefore, people with moderate esteem may be the most persuadable
11
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Anxiety
Anxiety disorders affect approximately 40 million Americans (ADAA, 2010)
Persuasion requires attention, comprehension, and yielding to a message
Anxious people may have more trouble attending to a message
Anxiety may be distracting
Anxiety may trigger panic Anxious people may be more likely to yield to a
message
Focus on reducing anxiety and fear so listeners will pay attention
12
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Preference for consistency High FPC’s value consistency,
predictability. Are more susceptible to cognitive dissonance
Low FPC’s value spontaneity, unpredictability
13
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Self-Monitoring
High self-monitors are: More adaptable, sensitive to social cues More responsive to image-oriented ads
Low Self-Monitors are: More independent, less conforming More responsive to product features and
functions
14
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Ego Involvement
Ego involved people tend to have:
Smaller latitudes of acceptance
Wider latitudes of rejection
Ego involved people tend to have narrower views
Assimilation/Contrast Phenomenon
Messages are distorted based on their perceived compatibility with existing beliefs and attitudes
Assimilation:
a message is perceived as being closer to one’s own position than it really is
Contrast:
a message is perceived as being farther from one’s own position than it really is
15
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Naomi is mildly ego-involved on the issue of abortion
Loretta is highly ego-involved on the issue of abortion
16
SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY
large latitude of acceptance
small latitude of rejection
small latitude of acceptance
large latitude of rejection
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Issue Involvement
According to the ELM, a person with high issue involvement:
tend to rely on central processing
tend to be more responsive to good arguments and evidence
A person with low issue involvement:
tend to favor peripheral processing
tend to look for mental shortcuts, heuristic cues
tend to respond better to testimonials
17
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Authoritarian personalities are close-minded and conservative
Dogmatism is a broader construct
Dogmatic people may be conservative or liberal
Dogmatic people engage in rigid, doctrinaire thinking
Dogmatic people are more persuadable by authority figures
“Dogmatism—not religious fundamentalism, terrorism, or fanaticism in general—is the greatest threat to social, political, and scientific progress” (Johnson, 2009)
Social vigilantism Social vigilantes believe
their beliefs are superior to others’
They actively try to persuade others of their rightness
18
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
High “dogs” Prefer clear-cut rules
and order Like status hierarchies Respect authority
figures View the world in black
or white
“Low” dogs: Prefer fewer rules, more
flexibility Place less emphasis on
status and hierarchy Are less obedient to
authority View the world in
shades of gray
19
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Cognitive Complexity and need for Cognition
Need for cognition involves a desire to think about, reflect on things
Cognitive complexity involves the number of constructs people use when thinking
Cognitively complex (as opposed to cognitively simple) people:
are better at perspective taking
are more likely to use central processing
can tolerate more inconsistency
20
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Cognitive complexity People who rely on many constructs are cognitive complex
Their thinking is more nuanced
They are better at seeing things from another’s perspective
They are better at adapting messages to listeners
People who rely on few constructs are cognitively simple
They tend to think of things in black and white , either/or
They tend to have less tolerance for inconsistency, since they don’t see things in degrees
21
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Need for Cognition People who are high in the need for cognition (NFCs) like to
think about things
They enjoying solving problems
They enjoy discussions
They are more likely to engage in central processing
People who are low in their need for cognition (LNCs)
Don’t like effortful thinking
They are more likely to resort to peripheral processing, e.g., heuristic cues
22
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES AND TRAITS
Verbal aggressiveness Is a destructive trait
Relies on name-calling, insults, put-downs
The goal is to damage another’s self concept
Argumentativeness Is a constructive trait
Involves a willingness to argue by focusing issues, not personalities
23
C O PY R I G H T © 2 0 1 4 P E A R S O N E D U C AT I O N . A L L R I G H T S R E S E RV E D
Know your audience Adapt your message
to your audience point of view
Tailor the message to the listener’s frame of reference
Explain how the message is consistent with the other person’s beliefs, attitudes, and values
Pay attention to situational cues
The context or setting matters
Tale cultural values into account
Consider Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
Consider states and traits
Consider audience demographics
24
ANALYZING AND ADAPTING TO AUDIENCES